| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Watch Me Fucked
(1)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have an excellent selection of models.
+You get access to 30 extra sites.
+You can download the videos in multiple formats like MP4, FLV, MKV and WMV.
+Video resolution is offered in low, medium and high quality (medium resolution is 860x480).
+You can download photosets as a complete zip file and pic resolution is 960x1440. |
| Cons: |
-A part of their content is recycled videos from some of their other sites.
-The bulk of the performers on this site already have very similar scenes on the other sites.
-There are only 19 videos at the moment.
-They opened the site in November and they were doing an update every few days and then they stopped updating from early December until early February. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This may be a very good addition to the teen mega world network one day but the owners have to stop using scenes from their other sites as new updates. I can understand if they created this site to regroup all their POV style videos under one banner but they have to be careful and update with a mixture of new scenes as well as recyled scenes and they certainly can't skip updating a brand new site for 2 months.
**Since the site is still quite small and that some of the content isn't really new then I'd recommend that anyone looking to join because of their videos wait a few months. Anyone looking for this type of porn but more the content from the main network will get more than his moneys worth.**
**I gave them a smaller score than I would have if I was including the the content from the entire network**. |
|
02-27-12 11:34am
Replies (4)
|
Review
52
|
Evil Angel
(10)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to over 900 movies or over 6000 scenes.
+They have an excellent selection of EA movies and the bulk of their recent updates are all new releases.
+Scenes can be downloaded in WMV or MPG4 and resolution starts at 240p and can go as high as 1080p but normally goes to at least 720p.
+They appear to have some exclusif scenes/movies.
+They offer better resolution on some of their non-exclusif scenes vs what's available on other sites. |
| Cons: |
-The bulk of the videos are only offered in 240p or 480p resolution.
-Too many of the scenes have no real data.
-I found that many of the scenes from their older movies were not in listed in the proper order and the info on each is usueless.
-The editing on some scenes is off because the scene doesn't begin at the end of the previous one but is a mixture of 2 scenes.
-They may list a movie as being available but not all the scenes are availbale.
-No update schedule.
-Their search options are rather poor because they have very little data on most of their movies and the data available is often incorrect or insufficient. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I had a hard time reviewing this site because I really enjoy EA movies and I wanted to give the site a better score but I found that the site does not meet my expectations when it comes to older movies. It has an excellent selection of movies from yesterday to today and if you prefer their recent movies than you will be thrilled by the quantity and quality of these videos but if you are more interested in their older movies then you're stuck with a disapointing 480p video resolution.
*Be advised that older is not necessarily based on release date but more in reference to the source material. The best example would be Anal Attack 9 which was released this year but the conmtent are scenes from the site Ass Traffic so the source material is older than a couple of years. You'd think that since the movie was released to dvd then they remastered the older content to allow for decent video conversion but I guess they didn't want to bother for their own site.
**The site is worth the cost of a membership because you get brand new releases almost on the same day they are released to dvd and the video quality is at least 720p and you even get some 1080p as well. Id' even be willing to say that it's worth it for those wqho joined videobox's EA studio because the video quality is better on this site than on videbox.**
**I don`t think the site is worth it for anyone looking for decent older EA titles because you will have to do a lot of research to find the movies and the performers and the video quality is just too bad.**
*I gave the site a higher score than I felt it deserved because they offer too many new titles for a cheap price*. |
|
02-14-12 08:25am
Replies (10)
|
Review
53
|
Mofos Network
(4)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to 12 sites with one membership.
+They have over 900 exclusif scenes.
+They offer one very good bonus site that gives you access to over 4000 dvd's.
+They have an excellent selection of young US performers doing some of their first porn shoots.
+They also have a very good selection of models from the US, Europe and South America and they are from different age groups so not limited to just teens.
+Videos can be downloaded in multiple formats. You have PSP, iPad and 3GP for mobile devices. You have MPEG, MPEG4 and WMV in standard resolution and you also have MPEG4, 1080 and 720 for High Def.
+All videos have an accompanying photoset that can be downloaded as a complete zip file. The resolution varies per pic. I saw some at 1333 x 2000 and I also saw some at 1300 x 867. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest con for me is the fact that way too many of the videos are shot in POV and this is one of my least favorite shooting style.
-Since many videos are POV then the lighting suffers and that means that some of the shots are not as bright and clear as if it was shot by a cameran instead of the male performer.
-The fact that many of the videos are POV only then it can get repetitious rather quickly.
-I found that too many of the US performers had visible razor burns and pimples.
-They have copied Brazzer and started filming some Live shows but there are only 3 and they are very poor cousin to Brazzers live shoots.
-I'm adding one con in regards to their preview pages. These guys have one of the worst preview page I have ever seen from a large network. I dare anyone to tell me if they can figure out what's available in the sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I got access to the network with my membership to let's try anal but I've only downloaded a couple of videos from the different sites in the network so this is not a network that has much appeal for me. The POV is in large part why I haven't been able to download more videos. It would be really amazing if they went to a different format but I don't think that's what they want to do with this network. I have actually downloaded a lot more content from the bonus dvd site I got with my membership. They have many dvd available on Videobox so that might not appeal for eveyone but they also have a pretty decent amount of older movies which are not available except on streaming sites. The quality of these vidoes is hit and miss but I'll still take them.
*If you enjoy POV videos than you should find plenty of stuff to satisfy you from the various sites. Otherwise I would recommend you check if some of the other sites in the network appeal to you. Of course I don't know how you'll be able to do that since their preview pages are awful.
**My score is based more on the content they offer than what i got out of the main network of sites. |
|
01-02-12 09:11am
Replies (5)
|
Review
54
|
Double View Casting
(2)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have some of the first anals of girls just starting in porn.
+They have an excellent selection of teen models.
+All their videos can be downloaded in HD and the reslution is 1280x720.
+They have an interactive system that allows viewers to switch camera angles for each of their videos.
+You have an accompanying photoset for each video and they can be downloaded as a complete zip file. Pic resolution varies from 1024x683 to 1280x853 in the sets.
+They at least update with 2 new scenes each month. |
| Cons: |
-Site is rather tiny with only 62 scenes.
-They don't update regularly and you tend to only have 3 or less updates per month. This has dropped to 2 updates per month since August.
-The site has many of the same models as it's sister site "first anal quest" and they perform anal on both sites so might be a problem for some.
-I feel that the double view is more a gimmick than anything else. Not too mention that you have to download both versions to be able to switch camera angles.
-They only have HD videos so it would be great if they offered lower resolutions for guys like me who have a set download limit from their ISP. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This would be an awful stand alone site because the double view is too much of a gimmick and there's just not enough content to make it worth but I think it's a great bonus site for first anal quest. You get more of the models you like and they also have some of the only anals from certain models. Even if you don't like the double view then you still have the opportunity to download the same video shot from different angles and that could be a major plus for some looking for POV style.
*I have always been curious about their double view system but I'd never use it because of my download limit. Having to download 2 HD videos to get those different camera angles isn't worth it for a guy like me but those of you that don't have a limit then it might be worth it.
*I got access through my fuckndrive membership so I can't confirm whether you would get access to all the site other than first anal quest so I recommend that for now you join through only fuckndrive to get access to all the sites.
**To be avoided by those who don't like teens having anal sex** |
|
12-19-11 10:08am
Replies (4)
|
Review
55
|
First Anal Quest
(3)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
They have an excellent choice of teen models and often get one of their first anals.
+Videos can be downloaded in 3 WMV resolution: normal at 580x328, high quality at 800x452 and HD at 1280x720.
+Each video has an accompanying phototset which can be downloaded as a complete zip file. Resolution varies between 1024x682 and 1280x853.
+They update with one new scene each week.
+They currently have 155 scenes.
+You get access to double view casting. |
| Cons: |
-They rarely use the more common name for their models so it's a little hard to identify them without doing some research.
-They have banners adds for other sites on each of their pages.
-They don't have any search options.
-The same model can have similar content on double view casting. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is an excellent anal themed site starring Eastern European models who are in their late teens to early 20's. The videos are all well shot, well lighted and they have great camera angles to show the action. The models are all beautiful and they use just the right amount of makeup to let their natural body shine through.
*A plus in my book is that they often shoot the anal in a standing position or where the model is belly down.
*I got access through fuckndrive so I can't confirm if you'd get the same 4 sites with this membership because the only site that appears on the members page is double view casting. That's why I recommend that you join through fuckndrive if you also want this site.
*This is not recommended for anyone who doesn't like anal or teens because that's all there is on this site and all the others as well. |
|
12-18-11 10:19am
Replies (5)
|
Review
56
|
Let's Try Anal
(1)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have the first anals of many girls just starting in porn.
+You can download videos on mobiles devices in iPad, PSP and 3GP format.
+You can download videos in Mpeg4, Mpeg and WMV and these format are all offered in standard and HD format. HD resolution is 720p and 1080p.
+You can download the photosets as a complete zip file and pic resolution is 1300x975.
+You get access to the Mofo network which offers you 12 extra sites.
+You can search for all videos in the network using keywords.
+They show you the 12 upcoming updates. |
| Cons: |
-Because all the videos are shot in POV style then you're limited to only a few possible shots.
-I found that some of the videos had an amateur look to them with out of focus shots and bad lighting.
-The pics are quite nice but they have one of the biggest watermark I have ever seen. I calculate that it's about 1/10th the size of the image and it's white and blue.
-The models are cute but I really wish they would have used makeup to cover the skin blemishes and pimples on some of the models.
-The site is brand new with only 16 videos so unless you want videos from the other sites then you will be a little disapointed in the content. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I joined the site mainly because they had the first and only anal of Jessie Rodgers. I'm not disapointed because her's is one of the best on the site. This is such a new site that it's hard to tell if they'll always shoot in POV style or if they'll change as time goes by. The site is less than a month old so I'm willing to give them a break for now.
*I hope they go with a cameran and performer so that we aren't limited to only a few possible shots and better camera angles during the action.
There are some really good sites in the network so that's a major plus for anyone joining this site since it gives you access other types of porn than just anal.
**I recommend this site to anyone looking for first anals fro newbies and doesn't mind POV style porn.
|
|
12-13-11 09:34am
Replies (2)
|
Review
57
|
Brazzers
(6)
99.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They update with over a dozen new scenes per week.
+They hire some of the top US performers.
+They now add one live Brazzer shoot every month and you can even purchase live shoots from their other sites like Twisty's, wicked and Mofos.
+You can download the videos in WMV, MPG4, ipod, HD720 and HD1080.
+You can download the photosets as a complete zip file and resolution varies based on the year of release. The ones from 2009 to now are 1600x2500.
+They shoot scenario style porn.
+They show upcoming updates.
+They have a jump to action option on their streaming system where you simply click on the fetish and the viedo will star from there.
+You can use a download manager.
+Download speeds are amazing. I can normally download a medium quality video in less than 2 minutes. |
| Cons: |
-The same performers tend to have multiple scenes on the site and many of them are similar in nature.
-A large percentage of their performers have tattoos and/or implants.
-They often use the same male performers so if you aren't a fan then you won't enjoy many of the videos.
-Their search system could use the option of searching for both the performer's name and a particular fetish. This is more important with performers with multiple scenes since you might have to search over a dozen of different videos to find the one you want.
-They don't hire that many ethnic performers but I don't think it's a question of choice as much as availability. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my favorite site of all time. I wrote a couple of cons but I can't say that they bother me all that much. I wish they would hire less performers with implants and/or tattoos but so many girls have them these days that the pool of all natural performer is getting smaller all the time.
*It's true that many girls have multiple scenes and that they do pretty much the same thing in many of them but that isn't always a bad thing and the number of girls with multiple scenes isn't as large as those with only a few. I guess I must love this site since this is the only one who's membership I have kept for over a year and I don't plan on cancelling it any time soon. The fact that I only pay 10$ a month for it is a part of why.
*I don't know if I can really add anything that other reviews haven't already said so all I'll do is say that if you want to see porn starring most US performers than this is one of the best site for it. If you want to see many US MILF's do porn than this is the site you want. If you want to see US perfromers do anal then again this is one of the best site for it.
*If you prefer to see European performers or you enjoy interracial porn then don't join this site because there is simply not enough content to satisfy your needs. |
|
11-27-11 11:32am
Replies (8)
|
Review
58
|
Mandy Mitchell
(1)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+There's good chemistry between Mandy and the other performers.
+The videos can be downloaded in WMV, ipod and quicktime.
+The medium resolution for the WMV videos is 1280x720.
+Photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution is 1067x1600.
+All content is dated.
+A large part of the content is Mandy with women.
+You can join mandy's site for 20$ or you can join the full TS network for 35$. |
| Cons: |
-There is no specific date for updates and they can be a little long in coming. Mandy seems to be trying to add more content and to make sure that there is at least one update per week.
-If you are looking for TS having sex with men or other TS than you might want to look for another site because a good part of the content is Mandy with women.
-The downloads speeds are not very good when downloading the Hi-Res videos. You average about 180KB/sec.
-Many of the scenes are broken into 2 or more videos so out of 74 HC videos. You really only have 35 or so actual scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is my first time joining a TS site and the only reason I joined this one is because Mandy has a lot of content where he/she has sex with women. I won't get into the debate if a TS is a woman or a man because it doesn't matter to me since the only type of TS porn I watch is when it's a TS with a woman. The reason why I didn't pick the full network access is that most of the other TS in the network mostly work with men or other TS. That's too bad for me because I would have loved to have found more content but that could be a huge plus for those looking for that type of porn.
*Mandy has chosen to stay natural so no breast implants and she is a pretty feminine looking TS with a female sounding voice. Not sure if that is the norm but that was also a plus for me. Mandy is still able to get a decent hard-on so the penetration shots are pretty good.
*This is a pretty fringe fetish so it's hard to know who this will appeal to. If you are like me and enjoy seeing a TS have sex with women than this is a very good site but if on the other hand you prefer to see TS with men or other TS than stay clear because i don't think there is enough content here to satisfy. I would recommend you take the network membership instead since you'll get all of Mandy's stuff and get access to 16 other TS sites. |
|
11-15-11 07:45am
Replies (0)
|
Review
59
|
GFF Members
(1)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+There are currently 210 scenes and they update with one new scene every 2 days.
+Videos can be downloaded in either WMV 768x432 (2Mbps), MP4 768x432 (2Mbps) and MP4 1280x720 (5Mbps).
+They offer a few behind the scenes videos as well as some interview style videos.
+You can search for scenes using the models name, the name of the series or by key words.
+All of their scenes are scenario based. |
| Cons: |
-The site is still quite tiny with only 210 scenes out of more than 1200 possible scenes.
-I expected a lot more content already available when they launched the site based on the number of scenes they have available.
-All the pics are stills from the videos so not worth saving.
**They have very little web only content so be careful if you happen to be like me and have a certain amount of GF dvd's. It's quite possible you have these scenes on your dvd's. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Girlfriend Films has been one of my favorite studios for the last few years because it's one of the few that still does scenario porn. Their scenes always include amazing chemistry between the players, a little story , actual dialogue that helps drive the story, appropriate clothing (with matching underwear), foreplay that starts with great kissing and every thing that foreplay normally entails, well filmed sex scenes with a good mixture of softcore and hardcore.
*The above reasons are why I was really thrilled when they started talking about having their own website. The site is quite good and I'm sure will get better with time as they add members and content. I'm a little disapointed in the site but that's because I already own many GF dvd's so I was only able to get a few scenes from ther site. I didn't use my disapointemrnt in my scoring because this isn't the sites fault. The bulk of the actresses are American with only a small amount of European models.
**If you like lesbian porn then there is no way that you should pass up this site because it won't disapoint you.** |
|
09-09-11 06:08pm
Replies (11)
|
Review
60
|
Jim Slip
(1)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+406 videos of which 106 be downloaded as a complete wmv file. All the other videoss are broken into clips.
+Video quality for the 106 latest videos are offered in at least 720x408 and 1280x720.
+They have a very good selection of French, English and Eastern European performers.
+All pics after October 2009 are offered in either 1200x900 or 2000x1343 resolution.
+They use good lighting and proper camera angles to shoot their videos. |
| Cons: |
-I hoped that they would have remastered their older content and started offering them as complete video files.
-The phototsets must be download one pic at a time and they have to all be renamed since they all use the same name.
-Jim is the only performer so if you don't like him then you won't like any of the videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is my second visit on this site and the only major change is the number of videos that can be downloaded as complete files. Jim is a little older but he's still able to do great scenes. The quality of the model seems to have more well known performers intead of using local amateurs.
**It's a nice site with some good sex scenes and the increase in the number of videos available as full scenes instead of clips is a great thing. now all he has to do is remaster those older shoots into full scenes and he'll be even better.**
*I got access by joining Lara's playground and Lara is the person who was behind the camera for all of his videos and now has her own site (see my other review). |
|
08-29-11 06:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
61
|
Redhead In Heat
(1)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+There are 64 videos which can be downloaded in WMV.
+There are 94 photosets which can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+CCbill is the CC processor. |
| Cons: |
-The videos all fall under bad with crappy 320x240 resolution, bad camera angles, bad lighting, and even a few out of focus shots.
-All the phototsets are 640x480 resolution.
-I'm pretty sure the content is identical to the one found on mandingogirl.
-There is very little info about the videos or phototsets so you have to open the file to find out what you'll get.
-They are still updating with new content but quality is so bad that I'd be willing to bet that it's just recylced content from years ago. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Dawn is not your typical bone thin young woman but is instead a pretty chubby all natural red head woman who has a southern accent and likes enjoy having sex with multiple partners at the same time. She seems to favor IR perfromers.
*This site could have been something good but the videos are so bad that tube sites wouldn' bother using them. There is no reason for anyone else to get taken in by their less than honest preview. Videos in 320x240 resolution should not exist today and any site that offers only this type of resolution should close shop right now instead of stealing money from fools like me.
**I'll post a comment about mandingogirl as well because I suspect that they share content or may even have the exact same content. I can't be 100% sure and I'm not joining them to find out. One bad decision is enough for me. Neddless to say avoid mandingogirl because it's not going to be any better than this one** |
|
08-25-11 06:33pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
62
|
Lara's Playground
(1)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+She's a tall red head with a nice all natural body who likes both women and men.
+You also get access to Jim Slip's site.
+Videos can be downloaded in wmv and they offer at least 720x408 and 1280x720 resolution.
+All pics are offered in 1200x900 or 2000x1343 resolution.
+You can search for specific shoots using certain keywords.
+She updates with one new scene each week. |
| Cons: |
-The site is tiny with only 10 videos or pic sets.
-All the photosets must be downloaded pic by pic and they all have to be renamed because they use the same name.
-All videos with lara prior to October 2009 are broken into 5 clips. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Lara says that she's Jim Slip's wife and that she is the one who's been behind the camera for years and she's decided to get in front of the camera. I don't know if she is Jim's wife but she is definetely the one who was behind the camera because she sometimes makes an appearance in some of Jim's past videos and you hear her voice from time to time.
*She is an excellent performer and brings a lot of heat to her performance whether with men or women. Her site has really only 10 new videos with her but because you get access to Jim' site as well then she actually has a total of 36 videos. it's just that the bulk of her videos can be accessed by joining only Jim's site.
**It's hard to recommend the site at this moment because of the tiny amount available and the cost. You can get access to just Jim's site for 19 Pounds and Lara and Jim together for 29 Pounds. If Lara keeps updating with new content then her site will be worth it within the next 4 months.** |
|
08-25-11 06:53am
Replies (0)
|
Review
63
|
Fried Rice Fuckers
(1)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Access to 25 other sites.
+There are 421 photosets which can be downloaded as complete zip files. Most sets have over 100 pics.
+Resolution varies from set to set but 898x1440 seems to be the lowest one. Many of them are 1000x1333.
+A nice selection of asian models.
+They have 76 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and resolution is 640x480. |
| Cons: |
-The bulk of their content is not exclusif.
-The bulk of their content is solo models only.
-The majority of the models are unidentified.
-The majority of the content is quite old. |
| Bottom Line: |
*The only major advantage for this site is the multiple site access because I can't imagine that any asian fan will find sufficient content to satisafy his or her needs. Not too mention that the content is pretty old and more than likely available elsewhere. Add the fact that most models aren't identified so you will never if you have that pic set or not.
*There are a couple of other nice sites within the network but they aren't asian based so might not appeal to someone looking for that type of content. |
|
08-21-11 08:50am
Replies (6)
|
Review
64
|
Christina Skye XXX
(1)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to 7 other sites.
+26 phototsets and they can all be downloaded as a complete zip file.
+Pic resolution is 800x1200.
+They update with one new photoset every week.
+Content is dated. |
| Cons: |
-There are only 5 videos. 1 BJ, 1 B/G, 1G/G and 2 solo.
-The majority of the videos are about 10 minutes or less.
-The majority of the content is mostly sofcore in nature.
-Last video was in June.
-The majority of the phototsets are solo shoots. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Christina is an attractive blue eyed blond with all natural breast and no tattoos. Her site could be great because it is part of a network of other sites with some impressive content. I actually don't know why her site is attached to a network of extreme porn because the majority her content is softcore. The lack of video updates makes me think that she changed her mind rather quickly about porn or maybe something happenned in her personal life that prevents her from adding content.
*In any case there's no reason to join this site because you will be very disapointed. |
|
08-16-11 05:58am
Replies (5)
|
Review
65
|
Porn Fidelity
(1)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+There are 398 videos and they add a new one every week.
+All the videos after January 2008 can all be downloaded in WMV and Quictime at 960x540 and 1280x720. Videos prior to date are 640x480.
+You can download a solo and BTS video starring the model form each shoot.
+The videos are all extremely well shot with the right camera angles, lighting and an impressive job from all performers.
+There is a photoset for each video shoot and these can be download as complete zip files. Resolution varies from set to set but the medium qulaity are at least 900x600 and 1300x900 for high quality ones.
+You can search for scenes under ethnicity of the model and/or whether she has natural breast or implants.
+Content is all dated.
+You can use a download manager.
++You can get a 3 day full access for 10$. |
| Cons: |
-A large percentage of the models have implants and/or tattoos.
-I wish their search option had more keywords to help members find certain types of videos.
-The only 2 performers appearing with the models are Kelly and her husband. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is my second time at porn fidelity and the site keeps getting better. I had a hard time coming up with anything substantialy wrong with the site. About the only thing that might be nice would be a greater number of natural bodied models. That said they still have 144 models that are all natural.
*Kelly and her husband are amazing performers and they always seem to have great chemistry with the models. It may be talent or they pick models knowing that there'll be great chemistry.
Whatever the reason. Their scenes are always hot.
**To be avoided by anyone who doesn't want to see Kelly or her husband on screen because one or both of them is always in the video.*** |
|
08-10-11 09:30am
Replies (0)
|
Review
66
|
Mrs. Siren
(1)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+All exclusif content that is dated.
+They update about once a week.
+There are 48 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and resolution is 720x480 1500kbps.
+They have 53 photosets and they can be dowloaded as complete zip files. The resolution varies from set to set but the lowest I found was 893x1344.
+Unlike most of the other models in the nework. Her content is less extreme.
+You can access videos from the photos section and vice-versa photos from the video section.
+You get access to 8 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-The site is less than a year old so not that much content yet. Unless one or more of the other sites interest you than you might be a little disapointed.
-The majority of the pic sets are taken from the video shoot so not alot of variety.
-Site lacks the personality that a solo model should have.
-Although less extreme than most other models. Her content may still be a little more extreme than certain people enjoy.
-No search options available.
-Limited to 2 download at a time. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Mrs sirens is a beautiful blond woman in her 30's with an all natural body and some pretty impressive breast. She seems to really like having sex and she's into some pretty intense vaginal and anal penetration. She loves to have more than one patner at the same time and she's willing to offer them all her openings so that there's no waiting.
*She only has one lesbian video but I'd say that she really enjoys women so I hope she'll do more in the future. I didn't find much to complain about except that it would be nice to see more interaction between Mrs Sirens and her members. As it is. All you get are her photosets and videos. The one thing that I enjoyed was that her husband isn't often in the videos and that was a plus for me because he's very tattooed.
*Some may complain that you can't download more than 2 videos at a time but they only take a couple of minutes to download so that wasn't an issue for me. |
|
08-07-11 03:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
67
|
Real Tampa Swingers
(1)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+content is mostly all exclusif.
+There are 299 videos and they can all be downloaded in WMV.
+There are over 400 phototsets and they can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+You get access to 25 other sites.
+Content is all dated they are still be updating. |
| Cons: |
-There are only about 80 videos at 640x480. The bulk are only 320x240.
-Many of the newer videos are actually only part a complete scene and even some of those videos are split into 2 or more clips.
-I found that the cameran does a poor job on many of the videos and you often don't see the action from the right angles.
-The resolution for pics varies from set to set but anything prior to 2009 isn't worth downloading and I have seen some after 2009 that are only at 800x533.
-The large majority of photosets are taken from the video shoot so not very much variety.
-There is no search option. All you have is a choice between the year and whether it's a photoset or video.
-Site is pretty slow to surf because it takes about 4 seconds from the moment you press the icon to the moment somethin happens. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Tracy has been doing this since 1999 and she doesn't seem to be slowing down. She's a pretty attractyive blond woman in her 40's or maybe even in her early 50's with a very active sex life. She has a few lesbian videos but I never got the feeling that she's really into women. On the other hand she is definetely into men, and the age, number or race of these gentlemen is not important.
**The first major problem is that the bulk of the videos aren't worth looking at or saving because they are onlt at 320x240 and that's such a low resolution. The photoset seem to fair ven worse because most of them are from the video shoots and resolution is way below HD.
**I have a personal problem with the site in regards to anal. There is no anal to be found anywhere except if it's from other performers. She took a small toy in the very beginning but nothing since then. I was hoping that she would have at some point done some but I didn't see any on the site.
-It's difficult to give the site a good score because the content could be good but since you can't really see the bulk of it due to poor quality then all you are left with is stuff done in the last 3 years and that's not enough for me. |
|
08-06-11 07:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
68
|
My Sex Life
(2)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusif and you get a sense that Lori is involved in it.
+There is a nice drop down menu for finding pics and videos using certain keywords.
+585 photosets which are boken down into sub-categories. The resolution varies from set to set but 800x1200 is common.
+353 videos which are also broken into
sub-categories. Resolution on many is now offered in 640x480 and you also have some with 720x480.
+You can book Lori for personal webcams.
+You get access to 25 other sites. |
| Cons: |
All the videos that are hardcore, BJ and handjob star Lori and only her husband. These are all shot using a tripod or handcam.
-The length on many of the vidoes is under 10 minutes.
-Resolution on a percentage of the videos is only 320x240.
-Content is not dated so hard to tell how old it is.
-All the pics except for the glamour sets are taken from the video shoots. Those seem to be the ones with the worst resolution. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is Lori Anderson's site and she's a 30+ yrs old blond woman with an all natural body that enjoys being filmed doing the nasty with herself, her girlfriends or mostly her husband. I often complain that solo model sites don't make their site more personal. This is not the case here. It looks like Lori is involved and she has done some really good things inside.
*The problem for a guy like me is that the one thing she does wrong are the videos. I like pics but I don't really collect them. I love videos and unless you have some good ones than I'm going to be disapointed. How much depends on how badly the videos are. The first thing that I noticed about the videos is that she has a lot of the same thing. 91 BJ videos with her husband is overkill. You add 63 handjob videos with her husband. Then there are 92 hardcore videos but again they are with her husband. The only ones that don't include her husband are the G/G videos but there are only 17 of these and a couple are barely 10 minutes long.
*I could have overlooked the fact that she only does hardcore with her husband but shooting all that content using a tripod or handcam is a deal breaker. It made sense that in the beginning they wanted to save money by shooting their own content but at some point they should have hired someone to film them. As it is. All you really have are variation of the same stuff.
***If you like or don't mind videos that are shot using a tripod or handcam than you will be happy with Lori's site. I'd recommend that anybody like me avoid it.***
-My score is based on what they offer and not what I took from it. |
|
08-05-11 07:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
69
|
Roxy Raye
(1)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Roxy is at the top of the list for extreme anal queen of the US.
+She has 86 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and you get low or high quality(resolution for HQ is 960x540)
+There are 56 photosets which can be downloaded as complete zip files. (Resolution is 800x1200).
+They update every day or two and content is all dated.
+You get access to 7 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-There is a lack of variety in the different types of videos shoots because over 50 of them are of Roxy inserting various objects in her ass.
-She loves the extreme side of anal so you see her rosebud quite often.
-All the phototsets are from the video shoots so nothing extra. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Roxy is a such a cute girl that it's hard to believe that she's into extreme anal insertion. That's the good news for me. The bad one is that she's a little too extreme for my taste. I love seeing anal but seeing a girl try to push different size objetcs out of her is interesting but not necessarily sexually stimulating. Then there is the appearance of her rosebud in some of the videos and that's a major problem for me. I can't look at a girls rosebud. I'm glad that they seem to have no problem playing with it and don't seem to have any health issues but I still don't want to see it.
**This is a decent site for anyone looking for a girl that's into pushing different objhects out of her anal cavity and enjoy doing it. I really belive that Roxy loves this. Since m,any of the other sites have similar content than that's also a plus.**
***This site and most of the other whithin the network should be avoided by anyone who's not into extreme porn. Otherwise you will be very disapointed by the content***. |
|
08-04-11 07:26pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
70
|
Alexis Golden
(1)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Alexis is a an attractive 40yrs old woman with a very active sex life.
+There are 105 videos which can be downloaded in WMV(resolution is 640x480).
+You can stream the videos in the Windows player.
+You can stream past web cams shows.
+Sites updates with new content once a week. |
| Cons: |
-There are 105 videos but it's really only about 50 scenes since they've broken the scenes into 2 or more parts.
-Some of the videos is leased material.
-There are 144 phototsets but you can't download them as complete zip files and the quality of pics is average at best.
-Navigation on the site is limited to a couple of icons orand page numbers.
-There is a link to a VOD site with some of Alexis content which still has me scratching my head since you'd have to pay extra money to view the streaming content that you are getting with your membership. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Here is another solo model site that manages to fail because they do so many wrong things that they overshadow the good ones. The first thing a solo model site has to have is a personality. This is afterall the models site and it should reflect her in some way. It shouldn't just be a repository of pics and videos. The site should include stuff that can't be found elsewhere.
*If you are going to offer videos then make sure they are complete scenes and not in multiple parts of a bigger one. It's bad enough that the videos are only 640x480 but to have to download 2 or more parts to get the complete scene is more than a little annoying.
*To make a site seem more personal requires pics that are more than stills from the videos. They should include some glamour shoots and even some day to day stuff that isn't pornagraphic in nature. This helps members feel like they know you better. Of course once you talk pics than please make sure the quality, quantity and most importantly that you can download the phototsets as complete files.
**This isn't a terrible site except for anyone looking for pics but it is really disapointing.
If you want to see Alexis have hardcore sex and down't mind that the scenes are in parts than you should be satisfied. |
|
07-29-11 06:28pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
71
|
Barbi's Slutty Adventures
(1)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
08-19-11 06:27pm (Update History)
Reason: false information given to members
|
| Pros: |
+Content is exclusif, dated and they update with a mixture of pics and videos at least once a week.
+Over 460 photosets which can be viewed online or can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+Over 230 videos.
+Videos can be streamed in Flash.
+Barbi does can shows at least once a week and you get free access to those as well as past archived shows.
+There is a nice search option with pre-selected keywords to help members find a particular video or pic set.
-Barbi post regular updates on her diary so you get to see her day to day life. |
| Cons: |
-Videos cannot be downloaded at this moment.
-You can stream videos in flash player but lag time is horrible.
-The content has a watermark that has changed in design, size and position over the years. I found that the older watermark was hard to miss and in an annoying position. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I've had my eyes on Barbi's site since I saw some leased content on a couple of other sites. She's a beautiful blue eyed blond woman in her 30's with a nice body who likes to do a variety of different sexual things and doesn't mind being filmed or have pictures taken while doing them. Now can you imagine my disapointment when I first joined and realised that you couldn't download any of the videos?
**I'm not sure when they stopped making videos available for download except to say that there was a review done in June and even then the videos seemed to be hard to download. All I can say is that I've been a member for 20 days and I still can't download them. I made inquiries two weeks ago and at the time I was told that it should be a couple more days. There are regular diary updates that say that they are working on a new site and that this should be done soon but these post go back more than 6 weeks and there is still no changes. The strange thing is that you can still download the photosets.
-This is an almost perfect solo model site where you can see that the people involve really care about giving the site a personality. which is why I feel bad about giving them a bad score.
***Serious crappy customer service***
I dropped my original score from 72 to 69 for the following reason. I wrote a comment that the site was going through a transition and that the videos were streaming only. I was never able to confirm otherwise because the new site went online 2 days before my membership expired and amazingly enough. I lost access to the site at the same time. I emailed epoch right away to see if they could see what was happening. They sent me an email with my log in info and said that everything was fixed. Of course it wasn't and my membership expired while we were still exchanginfg emails. Their last one only said they couldn't do anything anymore since my membership expired.she could do but I'm still waiting for an answer and it's now been 2 weeks since I sent my email. I'm quite pissed with the site because of their contined BS info to members that the new site was ready. Their last info to me personally was that the site was going up at least 3-4 days before my membership was expiring and promising that I could download videos.**** |
|
07-29-11 07:13am
Replies (2)
|
Review
72
|
Hottie Hollie
(1)
71.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Holly is a super hot looking 20yrs old woman with no tattoos or implants.
+There are 144 photosets and nearly 100 of these can be downloaded as complete zip files. The resolution on the pics is 1200x1600.
+There are 81 videos which can be downloaded as complete scenes or in smaller clips. Downloads are in quicktime, WMV, MPG and also AVI on some videos as well.
+There is a search system to find pics or videos using typed keywords or pre-selected kwywords.
+Site updates at least once a week.
+You get access to 18 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-There is a small amount of videos and most of them are under 10 minutes. Not too mention that many of them are actually 30 minutes scenes that are split in 2 or more videos.
-The last video update was in may.
-The site lacks personality. You'd think that a site wearing the models name would have info on the model.
-Many of the photosets are taken from the video shoots so they might not be worth saving if you already have the video. |
| Bottom Line: |
-I find Hollie to be a very beautiful young woman who could have a very good site if she cared. This is where the site suffers the most because after all is said and done. I never got the feel that this is a solo model site so much as it's content filmed by a particular model and someone considered that they had enough content to make a site. There is no personality to the site. Nowhere do you sense that Hollie has anything to do with the site. For all I know the content is a few years old and all they are doing is releasing some every week until it runs out.
-If you think that you have to have anything that Hollie has done then go ahead anf join. In any case you will still get access to the other sites. I can't recommend this site for anyone else because there just isn't enough worthwilhe content worth saving. At least i certainly didn't find any.
**My score is based on this site being treated as solo. I would have to give it a higher score because of all the other content you get access to and that would only increase it's score.** |
|
07-28-11 08:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
73
|
Tampa Housewives
(1)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-You get access to 12 sites with your membership.
-A couple of the performers aren't bad looking.
-Navigation is the same for all sites so that makes it easier to find your way.
-There are many video clips to download.
-They use CCbill so easy to cancel. |
| Cons: |
-Just about everything from these sites is a Con. I'm going the list the bigger ones.
1-There are many videos to download but almost all of them are tiny clips of a larger scene.
2-The same videos appears in more than one site.
3-Resolution is a crappy 320x240. I could give you bit rate but who cares with that resolution.
4-Regardless of what is stated about updates. These sites stopped updating 2008.
5-The clips are tiny but what you can see of the action leaves a lot to be desired.
6-There are photosets but since you have to downlaod them pic by pic and resolution is just as bad as the videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
-The only good thing about these sites is that they use CCbill and I got access for 20$ instead of 30$.
***Please stay far away from these sites and I'd even add that if any of these performers are on any other sites then also stay away from those because it's going to be a waste your money. I can vouch for that because two of the sites on this network contain an older lady named Valerie and I got screwed by joining another network with her in it and it was worse than this one.***
I forgot to name the sites included so here is the list:
ambers interracial
ambers sextasy
florida trailer trash
hannahs nasty habits
hannahs hose & toes
julia exposed
julias interracial
kats back porch
pennys passion
valerie exposed
valerie interracial
whore bait hals |
|
07-22-11 08:58pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
74
|
Anjanette Astoria
(1)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Production value on many of the videos is very impressive with the use of soundtracks, scripts, dialogue, visual effects and editing.
+Anjanette is a beautiful 38 years old women with natural 36D breast who does hot sex scenes.
+Videos can be downloaded in MP4. The resolution varies from 640x352 to 848x480 and the bit rate also varies from 2300 to over 4000 kbps.
+There are 24 videos and they update with 1 new video each week.
**I normally don't put cost as a pros but 10$ for one month is hard to complain about. |
| Cons: |
-The lower video resolution means that videos aren't as crisp on full screen.
-The use of a soundtrack is a good idea but not when the music is nso loud that it overlaps the action.
-The use of visual effects in some of the videos can be a plus or a negative for some members.
-There are 24 videos but some of them are parts of a larger scene.
-There are no real search options and navigation is pretty much limited to next page or previous page.
-There are only 11 photosets and the quantity of pics in each set is tiny. not to mention that you can't download the sets as a complete file. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Anjanette is beautiful woman as well as an excellent sex performer and that adds a lot of heat to the scenes. She's not affraid of doing hardcore so that is also a plus. The main drawback for me is the quality on some of the videos. 848x480 is not bad but 640x352 is. This is a new site so they may address this in future videos.
*-Another necessary improvement will have to be the navigation system. As more content is added then it will be harder for new members to find scenes unless they want to scroll through many pages of videos.
**-Not a necessary improvement but one that will garner her more members are the photosets. A key part of good solo model sites are the many different phototsets that are exclusif to their site. If you are going to offer pics than make sure they are of higher quality, that there are sufficient amounts of pics and can be downloaded as a complete set.
-I could say that if you are a fan of Anjanette then you have to join her site but I personaly had never heard of her until I saw her site on TBP. Now that I know who she is and what she does then I will keep track of her work. Her site is only 10$ so if you think she looks good and want to see her do some hardcore shoots then go ahead. |
|
07-22-11 07:37am
Replies (0)
|
Review
75
|
Girls Do Porn
(2)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
08-04-11 11:20am (Update History)
Reason: HD is no longer available
|
| Pros: |
-All exclusif content.
-They currently have 114 videos and these can all be downloaded in WMV 640x480 2300kbps as well as HD 1280x720 5400kbps.
-All the girls appear to be unknowns and they are all cute to drop dead gorgeous.
-You can stream videos in 512x288, 740x405 and 1024x576.
-Most of the videos have a little synopsis of the scene.
-Videos are well filmed with good camera angles and there is actual sex sounds instead of music or silence. |
| Cons: |
-Quite a few of the performers have tattoos and the placement is less than desireable.
-The interview part is sometimes more BS than possible truth.
-Navigation is basically pages at the bottom of the screen. You have a couple of search options but none of them seem to work.
-The male performer(s) are used as stunt cocks because you never see their faces. That limits some of the shots that can be used.
-For whatever reason some of the videos can only be streamed.
-There are no pics on this site.
-Fan mail section of site is disturbing and only makes the site owner appear like a douchebag.
**I'm adding this to the Cons because I can download the videos in HD but the site still states that only premium members are suppose to have access and I'm not one** |
| Bottom Line: |
-The site reminds me a lot of exploited college girls but better filmed, far better sex scenes and better looking girls. Those are all great things but the one thing they have in common is the way they treat the girls in the synopsis of the scenes. There is a certain level of disdain and disrespect in the words used. This is even more obvious in the "fan mail" section of the site because all it is are request from the girls to have their videos removed for different reasons. Of course this disdain is not anywhere in the videos so can be overlooked as being someone idea of a joke.
-This is a very good site for anyone looking for new/amateur girls making their first foray in the porn biz. They may be new to porn but they are definetely not new to sex because the scene are for the most part really hot. Ashley is the only girl on this site that I'm aware that as done other porn shoots.
**I'm again adding a warning about HD videos. I can download them from the site but I don't know if it's a glitch or a change of policy. My hope is that it's a permanent change.**
***I've amended my score to reflect that the HD videos are no longer available. For whatever reason they were available even though they clearly state that these are only available to members with more than one month membership.
When I first joined the site*** |
|
07-21-11 11:31am
Replies (0)
|
