Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (367)  

Feedback:   All (2850)  |   Reviews (173)  |   Comments (35)  |   Replies (2642)

Other:   Replies Received (1277)  |   Trust Ratings (68)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 2883 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Facial Abuse

Facial Abuse
(1)
Reply of pornpundit's Comment

The reason marcus gave seems logical but is it possible that they changed their name because they were having a harder time recruiting women to appear on their FA site because of their bad reputation with talent? Maybe they think that they can fool new girls in appearing on their new site since they won't equate the old FA with the new FF.

I would rather they went out of business but that's just me.


09-01-14  04:58pm

Reply
2
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The thing that most people don't realise is that there isn't anything quite like online porn. Where else can you get hundreds of hours of content for less than 30$? Most mainstream sites require a lot more money to get a lot less content and often most mainstream sites don't allow download unless you buy the individual movie/show and that gets expensive real fast.

09-01-14  09:34am

Comment
3
Visit Porn Megaload

Porn Megaload
(0)

Goodbye ScoreHD

I discovered this week that Score has converted their popular site Score HD into the new site porn megaload and basically changed the content on score video to only large breasted women.

The cost for the new site is 50$. That's a pretty expensive increase when you consider that the other one was only 20$

08-30-14  09:09am

Replies (1)
Reply
4
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Technically I own three since I have a PS3. One is set up on my 55" TV where I watch most of my movies (that's non-porn movies) and the other two are on my 46" TV. I can't be sure if dvd's look better when played on a BluRay but they sound a lot better and that adds a lot to the viewing experience.

I now own a decent quantity of BluRay movies as the price is now about the same as most dvd.


08-30-14  07:01am

Reply
5
Visit Busty Buffy

Busty Buffy
(0)
Reply of HeliosMedia ltd's Reply

You understand that any flame war between you and I is only going to hurt you guys because I know what I'm talking about but since you clearly want to play than let's go. Before I get going I would like to point out that I have been a member of some of your sites in the past so the following is not hearsay but info that can be verified from my review.

You guys own 14 sites and none of them has ever gotten a higher score than Little Caprice's 76.5 (I gave her a 79 scorer in 2011). That was from TBP's review in 2013 which listed her site has having 97 videos. Seeing as my review of 2 years prior listed her site has having 86 videos than you only managed to add 11 videos in 2 years.

Than there is Kiki18 which had 31 videos in 2011 and still has the same number today.

We add Pinky June to the mix. I can't say how many videos she had in 2011 but seeing as her last blog is 2 years old than I guess she is not doing a lot of shooting for you guys.

Kaira18 actually lost one video since 2011 because she now has 26 when she had 27 when I was a member.

The piece the resistance is the lovely Sabrina Blond which I clearly stated is no longer shooting porn because she was escorting in Europe based on a reply by Little caprice on her site. She had 32 videos in 2011 and she has 32 videos today.

Did I miss a memo where you guys offered a discount on your pretty expensive sites given that they are all showing old content and not updating anymore? What your attitude tells me is that you are crooks. You may not have set out to be crooks but you realized that it was possible to fool enough people into believing that the content you guys offer is worth the price you charge. It's not.


08-29-14  06:47pm

Reply
6
Visit Busty Buffy

Busty Buffy
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

I wish I had better news because Lucie is super hot but the site has many of the things that make me nervous. It's nice and crisp but no way of actually seeing what you get for your money. They do claim to have a lot of content but if you look at what is visually on the site than you notice that there really isn't all that much. I think the cherry on the sundae is the offer to join for a 1$. Why offer to join for a dollar if the content is so great and there are multiple updates on a weekly basis.

08-28-14  07:14pm

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I didn't pick hate it because it's not a word that I like to use for something as mundane as porn.

I understand why it still exist today but I don't like pixelated porn and that's why I almost never watch Japanese porn.


08-28-14  06:33pm

Reply
8
Visit Busty Buffy

Busty Buffy
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

It's up to you but I recommend you read the interview in my previous reply to the webmaster. If he lied about one thing than what's the likelihood that he isn't lying about the resty.

08-28-14  06:30pm

Reply
9
Visit Busty Buffy

Busty Buffy
(0)
Reply of pat362's Comment

You probably shouldn't have replied to my comment because all I did was say something without actually giving any proof to substantiate my comment but since you have replied then please read what Lucie said in a recent interview about your site.

http://www.boobsrealm.com/2014/08/22/int...y-sensation-of-2014/


08-28-14  06:29pm

Comment
10
Visit Busty Buffy

Busty Buffy
(0)

Not Lucie Wilde's site

Some of you may recognize Lucie Wilde as being the model on Busty Buffy and you are be correct but Although it does star her. She said in an interview that she only shot for these guys and does not own the site. My guess is that what you see is all that you get and don't expect to see much more (if any).

08-27-14  06:12pm

Replies (11)
Reply
11
Visit Sin Drive

Sin Drive
(0)
Reply of RustyJ's Reply

Thanks. I was really curious. I on the other hand am not remotely interested in 1080p porn so you can imagine what my feelings must be in regards to 4k. I don't think that there is a single piece of porn that can be improved if it is in HD and I think most actually look worse because of it.

08-25-14  01:28pm

Reply
12
Visit Sin Drive

Sin Drive
(0)
Reply of RustyJ's Comment

Are you saying that if you only have 1080p videos than that is no longer sufficient for your porn needs and you won't be satisfied with anything less than 4K?

08-24-14  06:07pm

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I think that no matter if you are a mostly video only site. The moment you offer pics you must also offer zip downloads.

08-24-14  06:03pm

Reply
14
Visit Porn Duty

Porn Duty
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment

I don't know if it's just me but I got a strong sense that this is old content and not just a year old but much older. The interface is crisp but it's still circa mid 2000.

08-22-14  03:49pm

Reply
15
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't mind it but most performers don't stimulate me.

08-20-14  03:44pm

Reply
16
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)
Reply of martinlongbow's Reply

There is recycling and than there is excessive recycling. I am a fan of Sarah or at least I was prior to her desire to show rosebuds in every one of her anal scenes but I don't need or want to see her do another EB scene. I think her first 8 were more than enough. In fact I think that five was already more than I needed.

That's not to say that I don't agree with your statement because I do believe it's getting harder to find women willing to go the extreme anal penetration route. In fact I would say that EB is already there now because some of the last performers to have appeared on EB have had only toys in their asses as opposed to fist.


08-20-14  03:42pm

Comment
17
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)

It's starting to smell bad at EB

I took a look at this weeks EB update and the star of the scene is none other than Sarah Shevon. A very attractive young woman who has an amazing ability to stuff large objects in her anal cavity so that makes her the perfect candidate for an EB shoot. Now that would be a great piece of news if it wasn't for two very important things. The first is that Sarah has for the last few times had the rather nasty habit of showing her rosebud exposing talent. Now I hope that this is because she is happy to do so and not because she can no longer hold her innards inside her body. I don't know which it is but I do know that a rosebud is definitely not something I enjoy looking at and even less see people play with it. The other thing is that this latest shoot is Sarahs 9th appearance in an EB shoot as a one of the participant. I'm glad that she is still getting jobs but I don't need 8 separate EB videos starring Sarah.

I don't know if this is a fluke or if Kink is running out of new blood but I know that I will not pay money to see the same performer do the same thing with more or less the same people for that many times.

08-19-14  06:12pm

Replies (2)
Reply
18
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

Although I agree that 24 hrs is a reasonable time. I think 36 is more acceptable because these people also have to sleep and the problem may be one that requires more time than just a day. That said anyone going above 36 is not doing his or her job properly.

08-18-14  06:45pm

Reply
19
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)
Reply of williamj's Comment

Are you still having some issue because I just tried to download a video and I was getting about 1.6Mb of download speed.

08-16-14  12:04pm

Reply
20
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I said not at all but that is only because there is not any site that I actually care to stay for more than a month. I had a long term membership to Brazzer which got on me and this was a 2 year old membership and I visit the site a couple times a week and there is not a single video that I really want to download and none of the upcoming stuff is any better.

I wish there was at least one site that I could say I want to join long term but there is not.


08-16-14  12:01pm

Reply
21
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I'll second Cybertoad's comments.

08-14-14  03:28pm

Reply
22
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

It's a happened a couple of times and both times it was because someone had supposedly stolen my log in info. I say supposedly because I have no idea how they could have done that but it was resolved so it is now water under the bridge.

08-12-14  06:20pm

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I like what Drooler said and that's why I picked at least 100. The odds are a lot better that you will find enough pics to satisfy your needs and not so many that you will spend too much time finding them.

08-10-14  10:29am

Reply
24
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No but then again I also don't think guys should be allowed topless except on beaches, near pools or in water parks. I seem to remember a similar question being asked in the past but I could be wrong. In any case a topless woman is not the same thing as a topless man because men's breast are not considered sexual objects the way women's breasts are. I'm not arguing whether it's fair or not but it's a reality. Guys enjoy watching topless women. I don't know if the same can be said for women when it comes to topless men.

08-08-14  01:53pm

Reply
25
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)
Reply of elephant's Reply

I have never been a fan of FTV but it's not because of the models they hire or the way they look on their site. It's a question of the type of content they offer. Solo stuff does very little for me. I'm glad they still exist and seem to still be able to make money because you at least get to see how beautiful some porn performers truly are.

08-08-14  01:47pm


Shown : 1-25 of 2883 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.43 seconds.