Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (371)  

Feedback:   All (2979)  |   Reviews (175)  |   Comments (36)  |   Replies (2768)

Other:   Replies Received (1319)  |   Trust Ratings (67)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 1319 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Blacked.com

Blacked.com
(2)
REPLY TO #1 from Pyrenees: (pat362's Reply)

I appreciate your feedback so please allow me to explain. I was not as harsh on this site as I would be a mega site or on a more established site. Lets face it this is a Niche site. This is also a new site with over a years worth of quality updates. I can list on one hand the number of sites with only HD videos (True HD). Only people who are interested in couples IR fantasy are going to go to this site. As such I could find no flaw. To show you I tried to be unbiased please look at my other reviews. Also I am not the only person to give this site a 100 score. About my criticism's they were more of a wish list. I seriously doubt they will alter their site based on any of those criticisms and I did not feel they were of the magnitude that deserved a deduction. I will give you an example one website I used refused to cancel my membership now that is deduction worth for sure IMHO. I will give you some more meaty details. There are 55 scenes almost 300GB of 1080p resolution. I love the contrast of the white scenery with the IR couple. There are BBG, BGB, Anal and the best thing about the site in my opinion is that it features doggy style. I feel it would be mean spirited to deny them a perfect score when they do perfectly what they claim. High production values crisp downloadable scenes. This is my idea of perfection.

02-25-15  02:11pm

Reply
2
Visit Naughty Julie

Naughty Julie
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from charlesincharge: (pat362's Reply)

Pat you didn't see many reviews because the site has been idle for nearly 5 years. It was online but not updated since 2009. Back then it was popular and there were many reviews on it.

I re-joined because i had been a member of this site in the past when it was still actively updated by Julie herself and enjoyed the content, but all the videos were in low resolution so i was hoping in this 2015 relaunch that they were going to be all remastered to 2015 specs, at least 720p, the stills taken from the vids on the tour pages are all in 1920x1080, but alas, that's just a trick. Inside it's the same old vids just recoded to mp3. Not HD and not even downloadable anymore, so yep, compelete waste of 30 bucks!


02-13-15  05:37am

Reply
3
N/A REPLY TO #6 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

I know a guy who specializes in pre-1995 and vintage, VHS, mags, reels, whatever, so hit me up if you are interested.

02-08-15  06:59pm

Reply
4
N/A REPLY TO #4 from Jay G: (pat362's Reply)

Totally agree about being picky.... I already have more porn that I will probably ever view..... now am looking for new & different, interesting and creative.....always looking for that special item that makes the heart race with excitement like it did when I first saw porn so many years ago.

Kind of like mining for gold.... have to look through a lot of mud, clay, and rock to find those glittering objects.


02-08-15  05:04pm

Reply
5
N/A REPLY TO #15 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

Sad but true about the drop off in new content. There were years when there were over a hundred new sites featuring peeing, now last year I don't think I could name ten new ones, and many more closed than opened.

01-27-15  08:20pm

Reply
6
N/A REPLY TO #13 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

The taboo nature is part of the fun too. If it weren't for people opposed to it, and you are entitled to your own opinion, then it wouldn't have quite the same thrill.

01-26-15  07:01pm

Reply
7
N/A REPLY TO #11 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

If only people could keep a more open mind. Anything that can be enjoyed between consenting adults should be able to be portrayed.

01-25-15  06:06pm

Reply
8
N/A REPLY TO #9 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

Dude, I wouldn't touch that stuff with a 10 foot pole, and if I could delete it all with a keystroke right now I would.

Off the top of my head, here's some of the legal stuff that's been censored:

PornstarPunishment.com

This has been beat to death on other forums. Posts supposedly from a Brazzers.com employee have implicated it to VISA, of course, you can take that with a grain of salt. This same poster, who is supposedly charged with reviewing Brazzers content, wrote about some the other criteria for removal which include models in pigtails, because it is too suggestive of underage, and models drinking alcohol on the set.

SickPuppy.com

They constantly posted about all the pressure from credit card processors, now almost all of their content is removed.

WatersportsSluts.com (Hard Glam Network)

Owner wrote in an article on XBiz.com how he was forced to close when his payment processor cut him off. This actually wasn't because the content was too extreme, but he was a UK operator, and he failed to comply with ATVOD. Rather that allow him to work it out, his payment processor just terminated his account, and rather than try to find another processor, he just closed up shop.

Along this note, sites forced to close or remove content by ATVOD could be added to the list, and there are many of those.

YellowDiscipline.com

It is relatively common knowledge that F2M peeing may be permissible in small quantities on US sites, but M2F peeing is off limits. This is one of many US sites that specialized in M2F peeing that have closed over the years. Do I like M2F peeing - not at all - but it still proves my point. Some people do enjoy it though, and these sites shouldn't have had to close.


There's another huge group of sites totaling in the 100's that have categorically been censored by the credit card processors. Sites that featured #2, which I am not into, but also had tons of other content that was legit. I won't list them all, because these sites pushed the limits too much for mention here. I will just mention one.

Veronica-Moser.com

This is the best example, because if you go to her new page on Hightide (ask me if you want the link, but be warned), she explains in detail how credit card processors forced her to take down her site. She did lots of straight up peeing shoots that were legit, but they went down with the ship. We have talked about her peeing content, although not about this idea, but she is an example of someone who might be open to this distribution model.


01-25-15  11:43am

Reply
9
N/A REPLY TO #5 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

Bringing back the older stuff owned by people that left the industry is a long shot as you say, because those people are checked out and unreachable.

My other idea was licensing stuff that was censored by the payment processors though, and that may be an interesting discussion, so I am moving it to the forum.


01-24-15  07:37am

Reply
10
N/A REPLY TO #3 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

I think that you, me, and lots of people feel this way. There are so many posts on all the porn forums looking for this or that video that someone saw 10 years ago that they can't for the life of them find anymore. For lots of porn fans, it seems that these old videos are actually the most sought out content.

It gets me thinking, if only there were a way to purchase the older stuff together with the rights and necessary documents for distribution, or license it, and bring more of it back. Or, for the older stuff that went down due to payment processor restrictions, to find alternative methods of monetizing its distribution. There could be huge potential here, if anyone could figure this one out.


01-23-15  08:49pm

Reply
11
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(4)
REPLY TO #4 from uscue: (pat362's Reply)

Yep it's back to 29.95. No thanks BBros, I prefer to pay for sites with content I like b/c it's the "right thing to do", but it's 2015! No site should be more than $15-20 when the current internet climate makes it so easy to get all of the content for free ... and I'm not talking about pornhub or some other streaming site. I'll keep supporting three of the other major networks that have enticing rates for us peer review aficionados as well as two smaller international networks that I love.

12-31-14  11:16pm

Reply
12
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(4)
REPLY TO #2 from uscue: (pat362's Reply)

That is extremely odd, it now shows up for me too. The join page looks different than normal though (including opening a new browser and just trying to join without clicking through PU) which is slightly disconcerting, but it is interesting nonetheless that the offer came back. Maybe they do read these sites ...

12-30-14  12:40pm

Reply
13
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)
REPLY TO #11 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

Your comment here makes me almost certain that I'll not ever rejoin. The evidence suggests that your theory is correct and if that's the case this will be a really expensive rejoin if there is nothing more 'free' being added.

What a strange business model...


12-28-14  01:18pm

Reply
14
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)
REPLY TO #10 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

Thanks for the comment again pat. And I can say that the trailers reflect the actual scenes.

12-28-14  01:14pm

Reply
15
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)
REPLY TO #3 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

Thanks for the comments pat. Your original comment was a big help to me. I know I'd have been pissed off if I had joined this site without having the information you provided. I'll answer your questions in the order you asked them:

1) A lot of is like that. There are extreme gapes, large toys, hard anal, pee play, stuff like that. DAP seems to be something they pride themselves in. There are even a few TAP scenes with models like Proxy Paige who are known for extreme acts. This isn't normal hardcore porn. You're certainly right that the focus is not usually on the woman's pleasure.

2) Hard to say. They're less 'medical exam' and more 'endurance test.' I'm not sure how to quantify sterile, but the scenes have none of the sexual tension that I like. But I knew that going in.

3) That's really subjective. It does push the boundaries but it isn't unpleasant to look at. Certainly anyone who prefers artcore wouldn't be happy with this kind of porn.

4) I think there is an element of that. I don't find the makeup is often overdone, but the clothes tend to the garish. My preference would be for a more natural look. You can't go wrong with natural.

I'm fairly sure I've missed the mark in some of these answers so feel free to ask anything else. I'll try to be objective in any answers I give you.


12-27-14  12:33pm

Reply
16
N/A REPLY TO #4 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)

Ditto. No interest at all.

12-17-14  09:21pm

Reply
17
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(5)
REPLY TO #6 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

I'm with you. I purged my collection last year but couldn't part with some classics even though they're low resolution. I'm always on the hunt for more.

12-17-14  06:02pm

Reply
18
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(5)
REPLY TO #4 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

Good point. If VB, or any other site, followed your suggestion I'd sign up for a long-term membership to support them.

12-15-14  05:53pm

Reply
19
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(5)
REPLY TO #2 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

While I agree with you that it would be great if VB would licence and upload some older titles I don't know that they'd be better served overall. I'd love to have access to a wider catalogue of titles from good studios from the 1990s and 2000s.

But the problem with that is that's when guys our age started to get access to good porn and it means something to us. And guys like us are creeping into 'old man' category but some standards. So the younger members might not appreciate these older titles like we would.

I would definitely support a site that gave me decent quality old Anabolic/Diabolic stuff. And many other studios. Maybe I could fulfil my dream of owning every scene Tammi Ann or Inari Vachs did.


12-15-14  04:17pm

Reply
20
Visit The Classic Porn

The Classic Porn
(1)
Reply of pat362's Comment from sonofzog:

I was really looking forward to all that vintage porn, including the French stuff but I'm glad I didn't pull the trigger. I started checking the site when I experienced some server errors and for the last several days all I get is a bad gateway error. Sorry, but I'm not handing over money to a website that can't reliably even stay online.

11-08-14  09:34am

Reply
21
N/A REPLY TO #6 from host2626: (pat362's Reply)

"All the time. Thank God I have it because I would stop watching porn right now if I had to watch the bulk of what gets made these days."
^ THIS! :)


11-04-14  11:36pm

Reply
22
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(1)
REPLY TO #4 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

Here's the article where he made the announcement: http://www.xbiz.com/news/186289

They are reviewing shoots and possibly editing or removing some.


11-02-14  11:08am

Reply
23
N/A REPLY TO #3 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)

A brief BJ is OK, but a BJ that exceeds about a minute causes a fast forward. Cunnilingus, not a choice in this poll, is always worth a watch, especially if the labia lips are hanging down and available for nibbling.

Another fast forward situation is too much focus on a guys dick and/or hairy ass during the basic fuck makes me wonder about the sexual orientation of the cameraman.

I came to see the babe(s), not the dude(s).


10-31-14  05:22pm

Reply
24
Visit Lady Sonia

Lady Sonia
(1)
Reply of pat362's Review from Cybertoad:

I have joined this site awhile ago not sure why I didnt do a review. She was hot about 7 years ago but slowly in my opinion turned from older milf to grandma, and I lost interest. She went way off the original site as well. Good review, just doesn't float my boat anymore.

10-27-14  02:34pm

Reply
25
N/A REPLY TO #5 from Jay G: (pat362's Reply)

Soft-core for me always covers everything that is sexy but not explicit. The clips I've downloaded from 21st sextury and several other sites, for example, have several minutes of girls walking sexily, slowly disrobing, etc, before the male walks in.

When the male arrives there are often a few minutes of foreplay that I would also consider softcore until there is an actual hard dick or explicit sexual act. Kissing and fondling before explicit acts I would also consider "soft-core" but may be seen by others as borderline hard-core when the mouth gets near the genitals.

An interesting discussion, at any rate.


10-25-14  05:43am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 1319 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.87 seconds.