Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (373)  

Feedback:   All (3060)  |   Reviews (176)  |   Comments (36)  |   Replies (2848)

Other:   Replies Received (1346)  |   Trust Ratings (67)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 1346 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(2)
REPLY TO #3 from Jay G: (pat362's Reply)

The error reports definitely are not obvious to the uninitiated.

It would be a big improvement if the error reports were seen without having to click a link. I've seen and written error reports, but always think they are weakened by a poor format when they would be much better if they were on the same page as all the other information (just added to the page instead of connected by a link), especially since the wrong information is already there without clicking the link.

I often guessed that no one ever read the error reports I wrote.


05-31-15  03:53pm

Reply
2
Visit Lady Sonia

Lady Sonia
(1)
REPLY TO #5 from Salvo: (pat362's Reply)

Thank you. Yes I did go back and read that after I cancelled but Im not sure what she is talking about in terms of new laws. I subscribed to Jim Slip and Miss Hybrid both in England and they post hardcore content.

05-31-15  03:40am

Reply
3
Visit Lady Sonia

Lady Sonia
(1)
Reply of pat362's Review from Salvo:

Clearly something has happened over the past year. She took down all the explicit hardcore videos and now it is softcore to say the least. CCBill was nice enough to issue me a credit as I called within 15 minutes of rejoining.

05-30-15  05:48pm

Reply
4
N/A REPLY TO #4 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

A nice close-up is like eye candy to me. More detail just "turns up the volume" on the erotic effect.

05-21-15  04:31pm

Reply
5
Visit Blacked.com

Blacked.com
(3)
REPLY TO #7 from BLACKED: (pat362's Reply)

Hi Pat,

The update schedule will be 1 in 5 consecutive days or 6 updates on a 30 day month.

Anal scenes are still on the schedule, it all depends on the performers and we are always willing to film it if they are able to perform it.

Thanks for being a member and let us know if you have any more questions or requests.

Kind Regards,
BLACKED.com


05-15-15  11:13pm

Reply
6
Visit Blacked.com

Blacked.com
(3)
Reply of pat362's Review from BLACKED:

Hi Pat,

Thank you for the very accurate review!

*We have sent some of the bug reports to the developers for investigation and hopefully those are cleared up very soon (new site design is on the way).

** There was a small programmatic error that caused a 1 in 4 day update that has since been corrected to 1 in 5 days. That is correct and will continue to be the schedule going forward.

In terms of pricing, $29.95 is simply more or less what it costs for us to put out a product of this quality. Yes there are sites out there with 'lower' prices or 'more' content (data), but when it comes to value BLACKED reinvests it back into the library. A regular scene is easily twice, if not three times (exclusives), the cost of an average scene put out by some of the competition.

There are definitely special deals out there (limited time, past member, etc.) but given the costs associated with being a small independent studio we cannot simply cut prices across the board without sacrificing what makes the site stand out: QUALITY.

Kind Regards,
Stanley W.

Customer Support
BLACKED.com


05-15-15  01:23pm

Reply
7
Visit Kiara Mia

Kiara Mia
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from bebelover: (pat362's Reply)

I am a huge fan of Kiara Mia. I wish she would bail on that megasite. The images are not of good quality. Minimum at best, not downloadable. Sizes are around 800 x 600

05-12-15  03:40pm

Reply
8
N/A REPLY TO #1 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

2 weeks old. Just upgraded to an HP X360 with an SSD and an Intel core i7 processor. The SSD makes all the difference in response time.

My past PC was an HP Pavillion dv7 that lasted me for almost 7 years. Awesome PC, it actually used the same Intel core i7 processor that is still in the high end PC's like the X360 today. The focus has shifted very much from power to efficiency.


05-11-15  05:38pm

Reply
9
N/A REPLY TO #2 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)

I'm with messmer and with pat362.

05-08-15  01:47pm

Reply
10
Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club
(2)
REPLY TO #4 from hardog: (pat362's Reply)

First joined Teen Core Club in 2006. I know what they use to be and what they are now. Original content (in 06) was allot of the same guy, same scene, different girl. Then eventually a second, then a third guy then a black guy then additional sites... What they've done recently is 1) almost every site offers zip files for the pictures (even the oldest sites you would think would be ignored). 2) almost every site has some newish content (2006, 2009, 2012, now) that I haven't seen since the last time I paid $49.95 to join. 3) About half of the 250 videos on "Try Teens" now offer 1080P video so many of those will be "new" to anyone seeing the higher resolution for the first time. 4) There are 7 new sites (for me) that were not there in 2012. Fab Sluts, Anal Checkup, Teen Gina, Dreams HD, Teen Drillers, Nylon Sweeties. Personally, I think they should be commended for lowering their price for the "Club", adding zip files for 30 of the 31 sites. So far I've had as many as 11 downloads going at one time and have not hit any download limits, barriers or slowdowns. I visit Pornusers to see what is new and possibly discounted for the group. When I first posted the comment a few days ago I did so because this site still showed the price as $49.95. Anyone who has never been a member or has been in the past, this is worth a look. BTW: you can get a decent idea as to the content by clicking the links for each individual website.

04-26-15  11:37am

Reply
11
Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club
(2)
REPLY TO #1 from hardog: (pat362's Reply)

After further review... they have everything set up with zip files now even the oldest material. This used to be a major source of contention. Additionally... where the video format in the past was limited to WMV and the content (6/7/8 years ago) was always 480/540P they've remastered even the oldest videos to MP4 & sites like Try Teens now offer 720/1080P. Video sizes in the past averaged 250/400MB in size are now 1.3/2.2GB at the highest resolutions. The owner(s?)of the site have put a ton of hours into "re-making" the content fresh and the site is the best its ever been. Is it perfect? No because it still lacks a model search engine but I find it hard to believe they put the effort into it this to let it die on the vine. Is the newest content all leased content? Hell, I don't know the answer to that... I do know some of the hottest/latest stars have videos on this group of sites that I have not seen anywhere else. Pat, as far as being a long term member... at 29.97 a month why would anyone want to be "long term"? I know my modus operandi is to join a site for 30/60 days and discontinue the member ship for 6/8/10 months and then come back if the initial experience was worth while. One more thing, I have a 50MB download speed and have seen 4/6 videos at a time downloading at 1-1.5MB each (single videos hitting 6MB plus) so they've spent some money on their servers too.

04-23-15  11:37pm

Reply
12
Visit Dirt Pipe Divas

Dirt Pipe Divas
(1)
REPLY TO #3 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

I have no idea how the clips4sale survives as a business. I've checked it out a few times and the prices are insane. It makes Legal Porno look cheap!

04-05-15  04:27pm

Reply
13
Visit Dirt Pipe Divas

Dirt Pipe Divas
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

Pat - good news or bad news, thanks for posting this. Anyone reading this should follow pat's advice and join through I Worship Anal. Jimmy Hooligan promises some improvements, but for now the DPD site doesn't have any older stuff up. It is a very small site and I suspect that he'll update with some of the older stuff. Pat is correct that the IWA site has everything, and for $5 cheaper.

I follow a ritual before joining most sites. I read any TBP review and then all the reviews and comments here at PU. I'm thinking that I need to email you first too!

Thanks for the tip on this.


04-05-15  04:32am

Reply
14
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(3)
REPLY TO #6 from Dirt D: (pat362's Reply)

1- I don't care whether its WMV or MP4. My only preference is quality by way of the bitrate they offer it in. 1000 bitrates are garbage and comparable to a tube site. I still don't think you get that they were already offering MP4 since the dawn of time. They didn't add any new format.

2- I'm not sure what you are trying to tell me here. Are you suggesting that VB spent over a decade classifying videos into a "High" "Medium" and "Low" quality range when it was completely unnecessary and Medium was indiscernible from High and nobody can tell the difference? There is no difference between a video in 3000+ bitrate compared to 1000 bitrate? This is something I'm not even going to try and convince you otherwise. If you think there is no difference, I'm not going to go any further.

3-Jules Jordan and Evil Angel specifically offer their directors exclusive rights over their own movies. They don't belong to the studio, rather the director. I've read this about both studios already. This is why you will find some directors on VB and not others. IE: you'll never find a Rocco video on Videobox despite the Evil Angel contract, and you won't actually find one Jules Jordan directed video, only from other directors within the "Jules Jordan Video" studio itself. Some directors would rather pimp their videos on 20 different websites and grab every coin they can. Others like Jules has his own website that he is trying to grow and needs no middleman.

4- I used Hotmovies and AEBN for years until simply the quality just wasn't up to par anymore. To try and stream in their highest quality stream causes buffering (even on my 24 Mbps ISP). I actually started to join sites like VB to get much better quality and to OWN the movie rather than "rent" it in a way with PPM streams. Now I use those sites just once in a while only to preview new movies, and figure out which studio site I want to join to download and own the video.

As I said, to each his own how they view porn. If you are into streaming movies, and don't get wrapped up in quality of the video feeds, much of what I'm saying might not matter. If you mainly know exactly what you are looking for and simply want to download to own it in a high quality, VB used to be great, if not the best at this.... but not anymore. They now score low.


03-30-15  11:15pm

Reply
15
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(3)
REPLY TO #4 from Dirt D: (pat362's Reply)

I'm going to answer each point directly:

1) How did they improve when they simply dropped a format and added no replacement? If I'm selling pizzas, my large is 18", my medium is 14" and my small is 10". One day I tell my customers it was hard to bake the 18" pies because its a lot of dough to roll and toss properly and nobody else in town is making 18" pies anymore, and then I rename my 14" pizza "large" on the menu at the same price as the old 18", what exactly did I do?

They previously offered WMV in a high and medium bitrate, around 3000 and 1000 respectively, and an MP4 in a medium and low bitrate, around 1000 and 500 respectively. 4 formats for every video on the site, excluding the 13k videos that had a 5th HD format. Now they elimated both WMV and only offer the two MP4 formats which they've simply renamed "MP4 medium" files calling them "MP4 high".

2) It goes without saying that if a video was not shot in HD it cannot be uploaded in (real) HD. My point is that every video they upload it should be offered in a format that is similar to purchasing or renting the actual DVD, whatever format it was shot in. I think its fair to presume that was their original plan for the site. Something that digitally replaces your neighborhood porn store.

3) Money coming in to a dead studio is almost like free money for junk in your garage you thought was old and useless. Most studios still producing porn have no need for a middleman eating into their profits.

4)I will join Videosz maybe once a year, but most likely go direct from now on. I wont join Videobox again because Im not joking when I say the quality is equal to free tube sites. But that's just me. For those who don't download and look mainly to stream, it might have some value.


03-29-15  02:24pm

Reply
16
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(3)
REPLY TO #2 from Dirt D: (pat362's Reply)

The score is directly related to the significant drop off in quality.

I should add that not only does the dropping of the WMV format signify a loss of download quality, but ALSO a drop of STREAMING QUALITY. The "HQ" button that was available while streaming every video is now greyed out for 88% of their content now (I'll explain this number next). It only remains on the videos available in HD format.

To add some more detail, for those unaware, as of today, 03/25/2015 they have a total of 108424 scenes, but only 13793 (12%) are available in HD. Of those HD scenes, 4396 are Premium-only and not available with the standard membership, leaving you with 9397. So maybe I was speaking in hyperbole before, but the facts are 92% of their content is in the same quality you would find on a free tube site.

The purpose of buying a subscription from VB was for the quality of streaming and downloading, and to support the porn studios in a 3rd party indirect line. We pay VB, VB pays studios, studios can then continue to pay performers and keep producing movies. With VB so nonchalant about such a significant drop off in quality, I would not recommend them at all, so I feel the score is warranted. Its almost as if they are begging me to use free tube sites by their recent changes. I would rather piece meal memberships, a month here, a month there, at all of the studios I like directly. They will offer quality in HD, have more videos than is available on VB, and sometimes cost cheaper than the $15-$35 fee that VB charges for premium channels.

If you are set on a collection site like this, I'd recommend Videosz before this one. They have similar studios and the download quality is (NOW) much better (though that wasn't the case 3 months ago).


03-25-15  07:40pm

Reply
17
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from johnsch8: (pat362's Reply)

Did you actually read my post? I wasn't able to get a login issue resolved due to no reply from support at that site. Which means I was a member. Make sense?

I'd just like others to know that support in my case was nill. Next time read the fuking post.


03-22-15  06:34pm

Reply
18
Visit Blacked.com

Blacked.com
(3)
REPLY TO #3 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

I agree with you on pricing. They need to make it more attractive and offering a discount for TBP/PU members would be a good start.

Of course for you, me and several others here, the shit-kicking that the Canadian dollar is taking these days adds to the price woes.


03-15-15  08:49am

Reply
19
Visit Blacked.com

Blacked.com
(3)
Reply of pat362's Review from elephant:

Nice review again Pat and got me interested about the site but yeah mad I never got any email for $15 as been a member of fame sites a few times myself.

$30 for just one site is just at that point when I start comparing it with what you get for less at other sites and these days I tend to not have so much money to be spending on porn sites so look for discounts. $19.99 would be a better price and I'm sure they would find they make more money. At the $19.99 point I tend to take a punt on a site, $30 has me thinking too much lol.


03-15-15  02:15am

Reply
20
Visit Blacked.com

Blacked.com
(3)
Reply of pat362's Review from rearadmiral:

Thanks for the review pat. I agree that the site needs some growth, especially at the price they're charging. When I joined I got a discount offer in the email but as I stated in an earlier forum thread I stopped getting those email offers from all Fame sites. Maybe they were losing money on me because I took them up on their offers so often... (I'm just kidding, because by using their offers I pretty much retained a recurring membership by cancelling and rejoining on a new discount offer almost immediately so all I was getting were the new updates.) They really need a discount. There was a lot of buzz about the site when it first came out but now that it has died down $30 for this volume of porn isn't a good deal no matter how great the scenes are.

03-14-15  06:44am

Reply
21
Visit Blacked.com

Blacked.com
(3)
REPLY TO #9 from Pyrenees: (pat362's Reply)

Totally understandable ... and yet when you see the new August Ames scene mayhaps there could be a change of heart! lol =)

03-01-15  05:54pm

Reply
22
Visit Blacked.com

Blacked.com
(3)
REPLY TO #7 from Pyrenees: (pat362's Reply)

Of course I will however I suspect your score will be in the 90 range =)

03-01-15  05:48pm

Reply
23
Visit Face Fucking

Face Fucking
(1)
REPLY TO #5 from Pyrenees: (pat362's Reply)

I just hope I did a good job of answering your questions =)

03-01-15  05:48pm

Reply
24
Visit Blacked.com

Blacked.com
(3)
REPLY TO #5 from Pyrenees: (pat362's Reply)

No change. Its totally IR couples type of stuff. It is simply my personal opinion they are the best at it of any website currently at it. They even can boast top models. This weeks update is August Ames a sure win for lovers of IR coupling. I think where this IR website sets itself apart is in the quality of their filming, the contrast of the couples, the excellent doggystyle in every scene and how the women always act like its the best thing ever lol. Not my intention to mislead anyone. It is however my opinion this is the best IR website on the net.

02-28-15  05:24pm

Reply
25
Visit Face Fucking

Face Fucking
(1)
REPLY TO #3 from Pyrenees: (pat362's Reply)

Well Mia Ryder for one knew exactly what she was getting into. Amber Rayne bragged she could handle anything they threw at her. Gaia thought she could handle them (And she did 3 times). It is just my opinion. I am positive some women are 100% shocked at what happens to them. But only because there is a disconnect between what you are told is going to happen, and enduring it when it happens. If you listen to all the interviews (My favorite part) you will see that some women see this site as a badge of honor. On top of that the people who run this site pay VERY little. So why would Tori Lane, Trina Michaels and the other famous women come? About them being thrilled? Well there are a few scenes where the women are really into it Angelina Milee was REALLY into it. Abby was so into it they started spanking her like Daddy used to and that really got her off. My favorite scene is with Mya Mckay its amazing. Having said all of that I believe these ladies are told up front (And there is significant evidence of this in their interviews) what is going to happen. When the rubber meets the road is kind of when the magic happens.

02-28-15  05:21pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 1346 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 4.96 seconds.