Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Naughty America

Naughty America (7)

Active
85
pat362 (367) 10-13-12  11:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +There are over 5000 scene to choose from.
+They have a great mix of mostly US performers from teens to women of varying ages.
+They do an excellent job of tagging all their scenes so it's easy to search by keywords.
+You can stream the videos online.
+All videos can be downloaded in WMV and they started to offer the Quicktime version sometime in 2007. Video resolution from 2007 and onward is at least 720x400.
+Videos from 2009 to today are now also offered in two HD format: 720p and 1080p.
+You can view or download the photosets that accompany each scene.
+All content is dated and they appear to update with about a dozen new scenes per week.
Cons: -They actually have two real time feeds for cam sites running on a couple of their main pages.
-They have two side tabs on the right of the screen that have to be closed each time you change pages and although not that big. they are still a distraction.
-I didn't see a method to scroll back through their library so that you can see all their content. The only way you can view content past two months is if you use the porn finder option and select a tag word. Of course if the scene was not proprerrly tagged then you willnever find it.
-Using the back button to return to your previous page wil always bring you back to the first page no matter on what page you were.
-The site is clutered with advertising for their own sites or for third party stuff.
Bottom Line: ***The 5$ join price was impossible to pass up. Especially for fans of sites like Brazzer, Bangbros and Reality King. There are some variations in the sites but they all pretty much offer the same type of content and they tend to also hire the same performers. This site may be a litttle more geared toward the couples market or at least people interested in scenario driven kind of porn. Now just because it might be more couple friendly does not mean that the sex isn't hot and raunchy because it is.

**If anyone saw my exchange with a webmaster on a recent review in regards to live feeds of cam sites then you can imagine that this site lost a lot more points because they actually have two of these. I'm sorry that sites feel the need to do that to make money but if they must then the least they can do is make sure that it is in a section that must be selected and not on the main pages of the site.

**There is a lot of advertising clutering the site and this takes up a lot of screen space. You even have to close one pop up and skip over an advertising page each time you log in.

**The bottom line is that for 5$ or even the normal 10$. You will more than get your moneys worth and even the annoying advertising and the stupid live feeds shouldn't be such a problem.

***My score would have been in the 90's if it wasn't for the live feeds.***

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

hodayathink (18) The method to scroll through their library is on the front page of the site (technically, the second page you see since the first page is an ad). The tab that says "View Our Latest Fantasies" has numbers on it. Those numbers are page numbers, the arrow is one page back, and that's how you navigate the entire library chronologically. You can also do it for each sub-site.
10-13-12  10:02pm

Reply To Message

2

graymane (31) Comprehensive and informative is the operative words when it comes to your reviews, my friend. You could teach the birth-mother of these sites a few things.
And I think that goes for a lot of others here who derive inspiration and knowledge from your work, prompting perhaps to get on board and emulate your success by following your examples.

This review? unpredictably an applaudable stand-out?

10-14-12  09:15pm

Reply To Message

3

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #2 - graymane :

Thank You for the compliment but I can't actually take all that much credit because my style is actually stuff I stole from all of you guys. All I did is look what others did and the way they did and I incoporated those things into my reviews.

I can't remember which member said that he did his review on a Word perfect spreadsheet and then transfered the info to the site but that was something that I had never thought about doing and which I know always do.

10-15-12  05:14am

Reply To Message

4

marcdc1 (165) Great review Pat. I was also reading the comments and saw what you said about doing the review on a word processor 1st. What's a great idea. I've gotta add that to my workflow.

Thanks for all your support to the PU community.

10-18-12  08:09pm

Reply To Message

5

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #4 - marcdc1 :

I again can't take credit because someone else mentioned doing that and I thought it was an amazing idea.
10-19-12  07:53am

Reply To Message

6

mr3633 (9) Another very good, detailed review. Thank you for your reviews.
10-19-12  02:04pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.