Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
268 videos, many in 1280x720p HD 3000 bitrate, wmv format.
Older Videos at 640x480p 2000 bitrate, wmv or avi are not bad considering the advances made in quality over the years.
Many mature ladies, some for every taste, but don't expect glamor.
All contents are hardcore which is a plus for many.
Cons:
The typical Ferro minimalism. No search engine, no model base, no scene description.
Lack of co-ordination between the various sites. I just received this one as a bonus and once again had to feed it my awkward generated user name and password. Other sites manage to make navigation between their sites easier, why can't Ferro.
The very strong feeling that the network is on cruise control without anyone at the helm. Last update to this site was in October 2011. It looks as if they have given up and just collect money now for what they have accumulated over the years.
Only one download at a time possible. Attempts to download a second one at the same time will fail.
The same HUGE watermarks as in their other sites. This is especially noticeable in the 640x480p videos with their smaller windows.
No pictures.
Bottom Line:
This site might be worth a subscription to you if you like hardcore and reasonably mature women.
The picture quality in most videos is excellent, only spoiled for me by those accursed large watermarks on top and bottom. If you don't mind those then there is enough of what looks to be exclusive material to keep you happy for a while ... especially since one monthly subscription brings four bonus sites with it.
Just be warned that Ferro must be getting ready to leave a sinking ship, judging by the rarity of updates in all sites I have looked at so far, as well as deafening silence when it comes to support.
I won't be back but Ferro might strike a chord with you, so I'll give it a 75. Not great, but tolerable.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
navigation setup
frequency of updates
system to favorite certain stars / scenes
Cons:
content feels outdated / old
much of updated content is old movies / DVD's
much of updated content is from studios I personally don't care for
Bottom Line:
Bottom line is that VideosZ and Xmovies are pretty much the same and I thought updated content was of higher quality. I'm not just talking about the actual video quality, but the content of the videos. For the month I was a member they kept updating from the same lame supposed amateur series.
I think trying to be too broad and fill too many niches waters the whole thing down
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Amateur teen girls in hardcore scenes.
Plain yet simple site navigation.
Lots of past models to watch.
Cons:
Very plain site with lack of options.
Expensive for a site only updated once a week.
Bottom Line:
Exploited teens is nice if you like to see real amateur teens in action. All the scenes are generally the same. They are all shot in pov style and have the same guy/camera man in every scene. It gets redundant but you know what you'll get with every scene but with a fresh new teen model. Scene starts off with an interview, then the girl getting naked, before sucking his dick and taking him in her pussy. Most scenes end with a decent facial and a lot have the girl take the load in her mouth and some swallow. The guy can get annoying and says the same cheesy jokes in evey scene. 'Wow what do I have three nuts,' and 'I was a good squirel and saved up my nuts' he says to every girl while ejaculating on their faces. Every girl. His loads are decent but by no means as large as he tends to brag about in porn world.
There are videos only. There are about ten pages of 'hi-def' videos and 16 of regular past videos. You can doenload the whole video or break it in six smaller parts. The only format is wmv 640X480. There is no search funtion at all. You simply have pages with the models picture and name and click on it to bring up her simple download page. There is no comment or ranking system either for the videos.
This is a fun site to see amateur teens in action but quickly gets boring. For the price of $30 a month its a bit much for only one new model a week but you do get several hundred past updates to check out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Unique fetish content.
+ Creative photography.
+ Good nostalgic value.
+ Low subscription price.
+ One-month non-reccuring costs the same as ongoing monthly subscription rates.
Cons:
- Low resolution images only.
- Primitive site navigation and layout.
- Site does not appear to be growing much.
- Videos are just a novelty.
Bottom Line:
I can give all the reasons why you might or might not find this site attractive. However, If you know who hese models are without Googling, my guess is that there is a high probabilty that you would enjoy viewing the models at this site--Maria Moore, Denise Davies, Bunny De La Cruz.
If you don't know these names but have a breast fetish or enjoy viewing images of women with truly oversized and natural breasts, meaty nipples, and saucer-sized areola, this site would also be worth a one-month subscription.
If none of the above is true, you should look elsewhere. That's it in a nuthsell. This is a very simple site oriented towards photography. There are videos, but they are simply small low-resolution clips. The videos serve more as a novelty of sorts and really are not worth commenting on.
The site is entirely sofcore. Most of the photosets are of the slow tease variety. They start with the model fully clothed and proceed to various states of undress, with the emphasis always placed on the breasts. You see a lot of images of huge boobs jutting through bras, dangling in the air, or spilling out of clothing items. Many of the sets were taken in natural lighting, outdoors and in pools.
I did come across some full nudes, but this is the exception, not the norm. This is conservative, old-school erotic photography. It is the opposite of today's in-your-face erotica, although there is a section called juggs-eye view, where there are many images of breasts dangling in front of the camera, as if in your face.
IMO, the photographer does a wonderful job with posing. You can tell that he is into the subject. He is just not going through the motions. The photographer has a talent for bringing out the best features of the models and does a good job with angles. The natural lighting and the lack of intense post-processing adds to the natrual appeal of the models. Many of the churn-it-and-burn photographers in this genre simply have the model strip nude and take straigh-on shots of breasts. Post-processing is overused and images suffer from harsh artifical lighting. The approach is very forumlatic. If you've seen one photo, you've seen them all. The photographer here is always creative and uses various angles to capture and profile the breasts-- from the side. the rear, the front, arms in the air, etc.. These won't be the most professional-looking images in terms of lighting and studio backdrops. However, this is more than made up for with the way that the photographer deals with the models.
You will see many of the mdoels elsewhere at the classic breast sites. The sets themselves are all unique, howeve. I know many of the models well from my years of viewing this genre and have never come across these images. Many of the photo sets contain images of popular Big Breast models in their younger years-- Maria Moore, Denise Davies, etc. If you are a fan of these models, you might think this is worth the cost of admission, simply for their nostalgic value.
Where content starts to drop in quality is in image resolution, and this is my only beef about the galleries. This content represents a very unique and sometimes nostalgic cdollection. The photographer should offer these images at higher resolutions. They appear to max out at around 11100x710 and many of the older sets appear to be old chrome scans of low resolution around 700x400. As this is primnarily a photo site, there should be high-resoltion images available.
The site design and navigation is very primitive and has an amateur look to it. I never had any trouble getting to content I wanted to view but the site should be cleaned up a bit to supply it with a more modern interface.
This site obviously wont be for everyone. Unless you can find a way to place natural-looking, ten-pound each breasts on the frame of a ninety-pound runway model, you are left with finding them on women of the voluptuous and BBW variety. If this turns you off, you will likely not find the content appealing. Also, if you cannnot live without high resolution images, you also will be dissapointed.
It was somehwat difficult to provide a score as this site doesn't claim to be a slick and professional studio and is basicallty the work of a single photographer displaying a photo collection that has been accumulated throughout the years. Please take this into consideration when viewing the score. I ended up rating it based on what it meant to me as someone with a breast feitsh and lover of voluptuous women. I would rate it even higher if the not for the relatively low resolution galleries. As a one-month only quick stop for those with a fetish for oversized breasts, its worth a try, especially given the modest price and the unique content.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
True amateur girls.
Nice set ups with interviews that help you get to know the girl before the action.
Good amount of videos with different girls.
Cons:
Expensive for only one update a week.
Only one update a week.
Very few options and no search feature.
Lay out is simple but plain.
Bottom Line:
Broke amateurs is a great little amateur porn site. The same guy gets girls to come in and do a porn scene with him. All the girls are newbies and most likely won't be seen anywhere else. Most are younger girls but he does occasionaly have a scene with an older milf. The scenes generally follow the same format. He interviews the girl then has her give him a blow job and gets them to try some deep throating. Some are better than it than others. He then shoots an enormous load of jizz into their mouths and has them swallow it. Suprisingly most can handle it but some have trouble thats fun to see. He then has the girl play with her self using a toy before finally fucking them. Some of the scenes he is able to get the girl to do anal. Then most scene end with another huge load of jizz to the face. Some end with a cream pie. The cum shots are got from different angles and shown in slow motion afterwards. Then an exit interview with the girl. He is very nice and courteos to the girls and though some are pushed to the limit they all seem to have a good time thats nice to see.
There are only videos available. You can stream them or download a high or low quality version. There is also a link to a blog he has the gives some info on the scenes and upcoming girls. The videos come in standard 640X480 wmv format.
Overall a fun amateur site where you can see real amateur girls in action. The downside is for #30 a month you get one update a week and a bare bones kind of site. Worth checking out though especially with access to close to 200 scenes.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge amount of vids with varied content.
Great price for the amount of content.
Excellent search features and options.
Daily updates of 5 new videos.
Cons:
Content is not exclusive, its videos from other porn production companies.
Only offers one hi-def video a day out of the five offered.
Extra charges for certain studios.
Bottom Line:
Videobox is an excellent porn site with a lot to offer. They have daily updates with five full videos a day.
The content focuses on main stream porn though they do occasionally have a fetish video including some trannie porn and bdsm. Most of the content is straight boy/girl sex from big porn companies such as lethal hardcore, vince voyeur studios, and now even jules jordan. Of course they also have lesbian scenes and gang bang videos. The search feature allows you to search for niche content easily and has a porn model search feature but for female porn stars only.
Vivid and evil angel have a seperate chanel with one video added every other day but there is an additional monthly fee for full access. They also have added content for reality kings and kink recently for other additonal charges. How ever the main site has several thousand porn videos you can download, stream, and even make your own custom clips that offers endless hours of porn surfing.
Each day at 8am eastern time they add five vidoes. The videos show up with their covers. You can click on the video and it shows each scene with six screen shots to give you and idea of the content. Most videos also have a description and the names of the femal porn stars in the video and scene. Each scene has the option to download in wmv, at 640X480, 480X362 iphone at 320X240 and H.264 at 640X480. Also one video a day has a hi-def opetion for download. Videos can also be streamed by flash player and you can cut and make your own custom clip if you don't eant to download the whole scene and save disk space on your device. Each scene and video also has a comment section where you can add your thoughts or reviews for the scenes.
Overall videobox has an enormous porn collection of content with something for everyone. For the price and the vast amount of content this site can't be beat.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Huge site
- Excellent quality pictures and videos
- Pictures and videos given equal effort
- Stunning models
- Good mix of North American, European and Russian models
- Some porn A-listers and some relative unknowns
- Many options for downloads
- Well organized site (simple where it doesn’t need to be complex)
- Good mix of softcore, girl-girl and hardcore
- Best search function I’ve ever encountered
- Supports download managers
- Older material appears to have been ‘remastered’ to make it look better
Cons:
- Fairly tame for fans of hardcore
Bottom Line:
Subjectively, this really isn’t my kind of site. Having said that, this is a repeat membership for me since this was one of the first pay sites I joined six or seven years ago. I was impressed then, and I’m still impressed.
Most PU members will know this site, so I won’t spend a lot of time describing it. Nubiles is a huge site featuring a bewildering array of young, beautiful models from around the world. There is enough variation in body type and age that anyone could join the site and find hundreds of models to fit his taste. The majority of the models are American (with some porn girls here too), Eastern European and Russian. But many other nationalities are represented too. The site currently says there are 1030 models, close to 600,000 pictures and over 5400 movies. I have no reason to think they’re making that up.
Most sites seem to fall into either being a picture site or a video site. If they do one well, the other is just a necessary add-on. Not so here. Regardless if you’re a picture guy or a video guy you’ll see the site as exceeding your expectations. One format isn’t dominant over the other and one doesn’t detract from the other. This is a lesson many other large site could learn.
Nubiles has been around since 2004 so you’ll obviously find some variation in picture and video quality. Having said that, it appears that the site has always pushed the limits of technology so even back in 2004 they were better than most. Even the oldest pictures and videos still look good. It also appears that some of the videos have been ‘remastered’ to make them better. If this is true, and I think it is, this underscores the site’s efforts to provide the best quality available.
All but the oldest picture sets on the site are available in two sizes. All sets are available as singles or as a zip. The newer photos in high res come in at 1600x2400 and the low res are 800x1200. The older pictures are 800x1200, which would have been amazing quality in 2004. They may have been updated at some point. Photos sets vary from 60+ photos to 100+ photos. Subjectively, the quality is excellent.
Videos are available in a wide variety of formats and sizes. There aren’t many other sites that offer this many options. Even the oldest videos on the site can be streamed or can be downloaded in multiple formats. Newer videos are available as streams in three different resolutions. Downloads are available in wmv, mpg, mp4 (low and high res), avi and mobile. Older scenes also offer the video in segments. My preference is WMV so that’s what I downloaded. They use codec 9 and the videos are 1280x720 @3600kb/s and 30fps. Subjectively, they look great.
The search function on the site is incredibly complex in its operation but simple to use. It allows a member to sort models by personal attributes. The usual traits are listed, such as breast size, hair colour, race and age, but there are some obscure attributes that can be sorted too, like braces, skin tone (tanned or not) and even by nipple type. You can search by type of outfit, You want to see a model smoking? You can sort by that too. The setting is searchable too. I know I said that Met Art has the best search function I’ve ever seen, but Nubiles is better still.
One thing I’ve never seen before and I wish would catch on is the ability for members to post links to other pay sites where the model has material. This is great for models who change their names a lot. To me, this function demonstrates the professionalism and customer-interest that Nubiles has.
The only negative I can think of is purely subjective: the site is just a bit too tame for my liking. There are lesbian and hardcore scenes here, but they aren’t the main focus. Hardcore isn’t just an add-on, because those scenes are very well done, but the main focus is solo girl and solo masturbation. If you’re a hardcore fan there is enough here to warrant a membership but you won’t find anything that pushes the limits. I only found one anal scene, for example.
The bottom line is that if you’re an active porn buyer you owe it to yourself to check this site out. It doesn’t try to be everything to everyone (the lack of ‘hard’ hardcore, for example), but what it does it does almost perfectly. The models are amazing, the photos and videos are well done and the site is laid out to help you find what interests you. I highly recommend Nubiles. It is definitely on my list of sites for repeat memberships.
(One last thing: I only noticed this on one scene, but I wonder if other older scenes have the same issue. There’s a scene with “Kate,” aka Kathleen Kruz where she gives a blowjob and the scene has been edited to jump right into the event. The original scene had a brief but playful setup that made the scene so much better. I hope this hasn’t happened in many other scenes. In my opinion, the setup is as important as the sex.)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Kiara Mia is a very pretty solo model who is hard to find content of.
- If you try to leave the site after taking the tour you are offered a lower price of $19.75.
- Some pictures have extremely high resolutions, some go near 6000 long end.
- Site is fast
- 13 similar solo sites included in membership
Cons:
- Where to start? First of all the site has no downloads to speak of. You can't download the videos and though some of the picture sets have a download link, it doesn't work.
- Really old style of updates, including up to 10 parts/updates for ONE photoset. Videos are also updated this way and can be streamed.
- From looking at two of the bonus sites, Isis Taylor, Nina Mercedez, those sites also offer no downloads.
- To ask $30 for this group of poor sites with very low quantity counts is borderline criminal. Honestly, I don't even like this model anymore. That's how disgusted this site made me.
- Speaking of criminal, some of the videos and picture sets are from Brazzers and Aziani. I'm sure they have rights to use those, but I already had those videos from Brazzers and Aziani.
- Archived webcam shows are poor. One includes Kiara fully dressed until the last 2 minutes, just sitting and talking. I joined a porn site not a "tell me about your GD life site".
Bottom Line:
I probably could have went on with cons for another 1000 characters or so. I am not kidding when I say this or exaggerating, I cancelled my membership with this site within 9 minutes of joining it, according to my ccbill receipts. I got burnt on some solo sites a few months ago. Made myself write, "I will not fall for those solo sites anymore" 500 times, then fell for it again.
There is a little good. I tell you though, you're going to have to work to get the good. The good is you can use a legal bulk image software downloader to download all the photos in each set.
Every set that has a "download this set in zip" link gives me a 403 Forbidden message when I click it, so using the bulk downloader was the only choice since I'm not going to go back to 1998 and do right click save as on each photo.
Most of the pictures are 1500x1000, but I would say 15-20% are in the 3500x6000 range. The reason I had been drawn to this model was a set I saw on Reality Kings that had her in it for about 1-2 minutes. It was one of those sets that has 15-20 women in it. She really stood out in that video and I had been looking for content of her ever since seeing it. I did a few sets on Brazzers, but haven't had much luck anywhere else.
So these pictures, despite being a pain in the ass to download, are pretty rare. There also are a lot of pictures. The thing is, there isn't a lot of sets. For those that were around porn sites in the early 2000s, you'll know this practice that this group of sites practices.
Here's what you see when you join. There are 20 photo sets per page and there are 15 pages. That's 300 photo sets. Right? Or roughly. Hell, lets say 250 photo sets.
Looking on my hard drive, there are roughly 50 photo sets. These include sets as small as 15 photos of Kiara at a gay/lesbian celebration. I don't have 50, my count is 37, but I grouped most of the candid ones into one folder so I'm giving them a boost when I say 50. I can tell you that there are roughly 4,000 photos. You can do the math. They have 250 or so photo sets listed, 4,000 pictures, there's roughly 15-25 photos in each set. Now for the fun part. You'll find photos that went with a set updated in late 2009, in the late 2010 updates and have to drop them into the right folder.
I can't support that. It's misleading, it's 2012, piece photo sets together over 7-8 updates is a hassle and a cheap way to boost the content count. This wouldn't have been so bad if the videos weren't done the same way, but they are. This gets worse too. Besides only allowing streaming, they release a video in parts, 2-5 on some, then they release the "full" video as a new update.
This site's earliest content is dated 8-3-2009. That means this site is nearly 2.5 years old. It has roughly 40-50 photo sets and around 20 full videos. Based on this pace, the site has been up for 129 weeks, thanks date duration calculator and has roughly 60-70 full scenes or photo sets.
I can't tell you how pitiful that is and it's still updating too. They list their updates now as 3-4 times a week, but they are tiny pieces of full sets of photos or tiny pieces of videos. Plus you have to go through the hassle of using an image downloader and can't download the movies.
On the blog, Kiara has posted one time that I see. On her twitter which is linked to the site, she mostly brags about how much money she is making. That didn't help my perception of her. Oh and lets go back to late 90s, early 2000s again, she has a wish list too of all the things you are welcome to buy her and send her. There's something to be said about models who are satisfied with people willing to pay money to look at them naked.
Technically, the photos are good to excellent. Nice resolutions, colors, settings and poses. The videos vary in streaming quality since some do come from other sites. Some look to be 720p, maybe, others look to be in the 480p range.
The webcam shows are still active, I think. There was one in the last month, but there was a full 6 month lull in these also in the archived section. Sadly, the best ones are the ones of her just talking. The others are webcam recordings of photo shoots. That's exciting, huh? Lets watch photo or video shoots from a blurry camera across on the other side of the room!
Not to worry to the webmaster or Kiara, I'm not making fun of you all. I'm obviously the dumbass here. I will enjoy the pictures though after 6 hours of loading a bulk downloader. Oh and on that, a few of the newer sets have broken image links, so you can't even use the bulk downloader on those. I gave the site 5 points for having a nice looking site and a rare model. That is how my recommendation for this site will work.
If, like me, you just have to have those 4,000 pictures of her and don't mind the hassle of the image downloader then you might not feel too ripped off. Otherwise, unless you just like throwing money down the drain, don't join this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-) Straightforward browsing and layout
-) Has the unique Madison Blush as the only model
-) Bonus access to other solo-woman sites.
-) Image resolution is decent.
-) Image downloading using download-managers is straightforward and easy.
Cons:
-) Server sometimes crashed while I was browsing the site once.
-) Softcore only - be aware of that.
-) Major fault: very very little content considering the hefty membership fee. As of late Januay '12 there are 22 photosets of Madison Blush.
-) about 29 USD for a month
-) no idea how frequent updates are.
Bottom Line:
All in all I am less excited about this website. While I admire the model and try to collect all the content that's around on the web of her, this website should be avoided. 29 USD is a lot for solo softcore content with only 22 photosets so far.
Maybe if the price would be about 19USD and with more content the score would be a lot better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of different women - the non-membership page shows a lot of what you will be able to watch in the members-area
Affordable and cheap!
Lots of content.
Easy to download sets or videos using download-managers
Cons:
Old image content isn't very high-res. (but new content is OK!)
Old videos aren't in particularly high quality (but new content is OK!)
Site navigation is a little bit "creative" but OK overall. No surprises.
Bottom Line:
Very enjoyable considering that the membership fee is in the sub-20 USD range and there is lots of content.
Although keep in mind: there's only softcore, so don't expect more.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Beautifull women
- Girls who seem to enyoy themselfs
- No anoying music
- No scripts, it looks like the girls are just doing what they want to do
Cons:
- The price of the site, but I have to say it's worth the money
- You have to know how to find the older movies
Bottom Line:
Can you improve top quality. I don't know, I love the girls, I love the things they do, but most
of all I love the fun they have doing it...For me this is the standard for others sites, but haven't seen anyone coming close. For me this is the site if you are a lesbian sex lover.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A huge archive of DVDs. Today's count stands at 10441 with five new ones being added daily.
Approximately 350 DVDs are available in HD at present, at 1280x720p. Most are in mp4 format. If you don't like large files there is also the option to download the DVD at reduced quality, again in mp4 or, for the smallest files, in avi format.
Excellent search engine.
Excellent streaming (depending on how many scenes you are downloading while viewing.)
People who like niche content are not forgotten, with studios like Niche and White Ghetto and
others that present the occasional unusual fare being well represented.
No download limits.
Favorite scenes and DVDs can be saved for a viewing or download later on.
Cons:
I really have to stretch to find anything negative to say. Videosz is slightly more expensive than its nearest competitor. It also does not have the capacity to create custom clips, but that's about it for me.
Bottom Line:
I like Videosz, as a matter of fact I like it better than its not-to-be-named main competitor in the DVD business.
I had complained in the past that niche content was being ignored at Videosz in favor of run-of-the-mill mainstream material, and it is true that it still represents only a small part of the whole, but they have way more than, okay I'll name it, Videobox, who are too conscious of the importance of holding on to their target audience to be bold enough to present an update now and then that would most likely be resoundingly rejected by the majority.
I would still like to see more niche material because after long years of porn viewing I do appreciate anything that is different, even if it isn't always pretty, but also understand the law of supply and demand.
I am enough of a realist to understand that if they didn't cater to the majority they would quickly be out of business. So keep on doing what you are doing, Videosz.
Your average update is in no way inferior to anyone else's and I have the feeling you are trying hard to keep everyone happy.
That's good enough for me to give you a high rating.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Mostly attractive mature women.
Latest videos are in HD format at 1280x720p wmv at a bitrate of 3000. Picture is good but could be better.
Videos can be streamed.
Picture sets (All Hardcore) are crisp and come zipped.
Updates are regular.
Cons:
Updates may be regular but are infrequent. As far as I can tell, videos update every three weeks while picture sets update every two weeks, give or take a couple of days.
Content is small with 82 videos. What makes it even worse is that only about twenty of the latest ones are in HD format, the rest are 640x480p.
If you wish to download pictures you are asked for your log-in information all over again. This morning I put in the correct info four times and was rejected all four times. A request for help by support presented me with a captcha that was almost illegible and makes it necessary most of the time to keep changing it until you finally get something you can read.
Only one download at a time, if you attempt more you will get an error message.
Bottom Line:
I got this site as a bonus when I first signed up to Stunning Matures and liked the fact that they at least had streaming where you could check out the videos first.
I also like the fact that they have quality picture sets of the video shoots. I must point out though that the sets are small (50+/-) and that the average picture weighs in at 1500x1000px. Not bad but not exactly cutting edge.
The videos are typically Ferro: The technical expertise is there, but in many the heat is lacking or the premise is improbable.
In one scene, for instance, a “cougar” is attacking a young man with a ferocity that almost amounts to rape while he pretends to be totally disgusted by the whole thing until eventually his juices start flowing and they continue on from there.
In other scenes the couple have barely entered a room when the Mature whips off her clothes, most often behind the surprised “young” man's back. I know these are fantasies but these B grade fantasies are usually only found in erotic stories written by inexperienced boys.
Something that makes more sense leading up to the action would be a great improvement, it needn't be long, just a bit smarter.
One other thing that bothers me is that the “boys” are so often almost of the same age as the matures. Or, to give the site the benefit of the doubt, they appear to be almost as old.
Finally, my biggest beef: The huge watermarks on pictures (lower right hand corner) and videos (lower right hand corner as well as upper left.)
General impression: I suppose if you stay long enough (a month) to accumulate an extra four bonus sites then subscribing to any of the Ferro sites is not a bad deal.
Especially since my criticism of the content quite naturally is highly subjective. I realize that, without a doubt, the videos I pan might be quite erotic and appealing to others, so the site didn't get the same low mark I gave to “Stunning Matures.”
As for me, I have cancelled already after two days because I just can't get warm to their site set-up, the difficulty in obtaining pictures and the incredibly huge water marks. If the videos and pictures I might download from added bonus sites during the month turn out to have smaller water marks I might be nudging the score up a bit.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Mobile version of Porn Pros Network.
- Accessible with main network membership.
- Big buttons, clean layout, simple structure.
- Two layout versions : light and regular.
- Images are 480x320. 8-10 per scene. All landscape.
- Mobile-friendly image slideshow implementation.
- Videos: MP4 400x224 (800 & 300bps), 3gp 352x288 (300bps).
- All videos also available in 8 parts (highest resolution only).
- Video parts have representative thumbnails.
- Links to mobile versions of official blog and twitter.
- Scenes grouped by site, category, stars or date order.
- Ads for other sites don't get in the way.
- No need to login on every visit.
Cons:
- They claim 6,000+ scenes but “only” have around 2,200.
- Fixed 320px site width. May look small on newest devices.
- Only 10 images per scene.
- Older scenes have no pictures or not all video formats.
- No scene trailers but mobile free tour has them.
- Search function doesn’t work for model names.
- On scene page, no info on which site it comes from.
- Video and images resolutions may be too low for newest devices.
- Several minor bugs make the experience less pleasing.
- Pictures don't work in light version.
- Nags as in main site: scene recycling, model identification, etc.
Bottom Line:
This is the mobile version of US reality porn site Porn Pros Network. It’s a simple yet complete site, good for checking new updates and for the occasional viewing. Things go increasingly bad in older scenes: as you go backwards in time, you start finding scenes with no photos, videos or any content at all. As I've said in the past speaking of mobile porn sites from other networks, I don’t think it’s worth signing up just for the mobile site but it's a nice addition to the main membership.
The picture part is remarkable even though they offer 10 images per scene at most. Instead of mimicking what’s usually available in non-mobile sites (hundreds of images, many of them almost identical, in a thumbnail gallery) they go for a slideshow with the most representative landscape ones. A single orientation is good because you don’t have to keep rotating your phone to make the most of your screen real estate. Images don’t seem to be picked at random and I was under the impression that not all images were also available in the main site. Next image is automatically preloaded and clicking next loads image without refreshing page, so getting an idea of what kind of images the scene has is fast. You may get back to the main scene page by a simple back button click. All around, a simple but thought-out functionality.
Video viewing is fairly well done. I’d appreciate getting trailers, tough. Just as viewing 10 images serves great for sampling the pictures from an update, it would make sense if they offered in the members section the trailers that are already available in the mobile free tour. Trailers are also available inside main members area.
Flaws from the main site crept into the mobile version. Scenes that the main site recycles get recycled here too. My pet peeve is the lack of proper model identification. They only have room for one model name; with luck, one of the models gets her name entered but some scenes get just two first names. The mobile site has flaws and bugs of its own, like some weird issues with the numbering in galleries and failing to identify in a scene page what site it comes from.
There are some extras that make sense in a mobile site. There’s a twitter feed of the most recent tweets from PornPros official account, although there’s something wrong with its integration with the official Twitter App. They also have a mobile optimized version of their blog and the BTS videos played without issues on my phone.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Allows download manager (DTA)
- Decent download speeds when accessible.
- Some photo sets are zipped.
Cons:
Some truly unattractive women. 50% or more if I had to guess. Not beer-goggles women. I mean actual homely and/or fat and homely women. It's easy to pick out the (attractive) pros' videos because they're the ones you don't squint and scroll past.
***HORRIBLE VIDEO QUALITY***. The highest setting looks to be 640x426 @ 2700kbps WMV, and most vids are around 100MB. Think 1998. Remember the old free Bang Bus clips you'd find in xxx galleries? Yep, that bad.
Add to that poor lighting, bad angles, etc.
Seriously, the video quality is so bad that sometimes I only knew the guy had orgasmed because I saw a change in the woman's stroking tempo.
Joined on Saturday morning. Their server was overwhelmed and inaccessible by 9am and I couldn't view any pages until that evening. Fortunately:
Very little content available. Divide that by half (unless you like homely women in low-res videos) and you've got an entire network that you can browse and download in less than 1/2 a da
Bottom Line:
Avoid.
Overpriced and outdated. Fortunately I clicked through to the signup page and then attempted to leave. I was offered 10 days for $10 and decided to try it.
I still feel a bit ripped off because one day is all you need. Clubtug has 13 pages with 12 vids each. Cumblastcity, seemomsuck, and over40handjobs have less than a dozen pages total with 12 vids on each page. I'd give you an exact number, but the server is inaccessible again.
UPDATE 1/22/12- Total pages of the four sites mentioned above is 30, with 12 (fewer if it's the last page) vids on each, and many repeats between sites.
My DTA queue has just over 200 videos lined up for download and I've seen every page. If I saturated my DSL line I could've had the entire network (well, all I wanted) downloaded in a few hours.
BTW, many of those other sites have repeats. Maybe only 35% of the videos are worth getting after you factor in the ugly girls and the redundancies.
I can only go on my opinion, and no one can account for personal taste. I like clavicles, tan-lines, and almost-invisible hair in backlit photos of thighs. Other people won't find that appealing. But dang there are some unattractive women on this site. More power to you if that's your thing, but I'm guessing you could find an ugly woman site with higher quality videos and photos.
That said, the photos are occasionally decent, although they're web-viewing size only. It doesn't redeem the site, but it should be mentioned. Unfortunately not every video has photos, and those that do aren't always zipped and available for downloading unless you're willing to click and save each individual photo.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Nice looking mature women
+ Latest videos in HD (1280x720p) in wmv., most of them are approx. 10 - 15 minutes long and look nice and crisp.
+ Fair download speed. My normal speed with most sites is at my maximum of 2.3 MB/s while this site gave me 1.2 MB/s. Not too shabby, though and since most files are around 300 - 400 KB it's not really an issue. However, be aware that this was done with Firefox' DownThemAll, while with Firefox' native downloader the speed was more like 250 KB/s.
Cons:
- The most "bare minimum" member's page I have ever seen.
- Only updates once every two weeks.
- A total of 90 videos ONLY starting in 2008.
- Huge Watermarks in videos in lower right and upper left of videos! Very distracting and unnecessary.
- Allows only one download at a time.
- No streaming.
- No pictures.
- No search engine.
- No information on videos.
- No model list.
Bottom Line:
First let me say that the ugly grandma on their tour page does not represent the majority of the mature women, most of whom are actually quite good looking if you like them a tad older than thirty-five.
Having said that, that's almost the only really positive thing I can say about the site.
The member's page is a joke with four small thumbnails of the latest updates shown plus a section below containing page numbers, if you click on those you are taken to another page featuring another 4 small thumbnails, there's no description of the scenes themselves, simply the names of the actors and that's it ... really, really bare bones navigation.
The earlier videos (and you don't have to go back very far) are in 640x480p avi format at a 2000 bitrate. Actually, in all fairness, they don't look too bad, but could be better.
The videos themselves are typically Ferro and lack heat. They are well lighted and filmed but something is missing. The samples I have watched seemed too posed for my liking.
Upon subscribing you are being given an impossible user name and password. I copied and pasted one and wrote down the other just to get into the site where I was promptly informed that I would need further authorization before I could proceed with downloads. So back to G-Mail to click on the authorization link and I was finally a member in good standing.
One bonus site of your choice (from the Ferro network) can be added at this time, but you are once again asked for your user name and password. If you get a site that also contains picture sets (zipped) you have to sign in to that one separately as well. Awkward to say the least.
In order to encourage you to continue to subscribe you are being given an extra bonus site for every week you are a member.
Stunning matures would get no more than 70 from me*** if it weren't for the extra sites that are being added at the time of subscription and in the weeks to follow.
As I can tell by my first bonus, not all Ferro sites are as poorly set up as this one. That's a relief because this site would never survive on its own.
*** This may look a bit confused but I gave the site originally a seventy-five but reduced it to seventy because of their super-sized water marks. This major change was explained in the bar heading the review but then was wiped out by further small corrections I made to the review.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Unique as well as exclusive amateur stuffs. They have some of the amateur girls, whom you are not just going to find anywhere else. They are doing everything from masturbation to complete hardcore.
Regular updates in their websites: They keep updating their stuff, which is what I personally loved about them.
Excellent quality: I know some have complained about the video quality being average. However, I feel their video quality is top notch to say the least. And the interactive nature of some of their videos are simply amazing.
And I love their models, especially Ally. She knows how to turn the viewer on in a very short time
In my time with them, I even loved their communication about the updates in the site.. Don find much of that elsewhere
Cons:
The only issue, which I find at the site is that the navigation option can be further improved. Yes, finding a random video is fine, but the ones with the naughtier shoots are what I would love to find at a single click ;)
Bottom Line:
Its a site to be, if you want something new almost all the time and that too from fresh faces :) ....
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-- Good amount of content.
-- High video quality
-- Nice range of models.
-- Decent camera work.
-- Intros and elements of tease.
Cons:
-- Download Speeds could be better
-- Poor image quality on stills.
-- Cameraman can be chatty and sometimes the background noises are annoying.
-- Older content lacks in quality.
-- Some models are overused.
Bottom Line:
Background:
My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.
I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I have this site as part of my BangBros subscription. It is worth a seperate review.
This is my favorite site from the Bangbros collection and was worth the price of admission to the BangBros network. There is a large collection of videos and photosets and the updates seem to appear weekly.
The models range from thin and stacked to voluptuous, with a bias towards the latter. There are a number of well-toned runway model types but the emphasis on this site seems to be more along the lines of curvy women, not thin and petite. If you are looking for the latter, you will likely find the site lacking. My two favorite models are Selena Starr and Jazmyn. Although the site is named Big Tits, Round Asses, the emphasis here is definately on the former.
There is enough content to keep the breast lover happy for a while. Site updates appear to happen weekly. Older content does suffer from quality issues, but in fairness, you have to go pretty far back.
The quality of the videos is generally very good to excellant. HD videos are pretty stunning, even viewed on an Ipad. Camera work is fine for my tastes. This is an amateur studio and it is not a professional studio setting so if you are looking for the spiffy lighting effects and all that, you might be dissapointed. If you just want high-quality video feeds of action, you won't be dissapointed.
The composition of the XXX video action tends to be of the up-close and personal variety--not POV, but there is a large use of wide angle perspectives from relatively close distances. Camera movements are not frequent enough to be annoying, as can often happen with some directors. The are intros to the clips and an element of tease. The models don't jump right into the action.
The only gripe I have about the videos is that the directors and cameraman can sometimes go overboard with dialogue. You can often hear the cameraman giving directions or engaging the actors in what most would consider to be cheesy conversations. Background sounds can also sometimes be present.
DL Speeds are nothing to write home about. I have seen better and I have seen worse. There is definately room for improvement here, however.
As far as the still images, this is not what this site is really designed around, IMO, and is where it is lacking. There are plenty of galleries with loads of images. The actual content and compositions of the galleries is not all that bad. The actual quality of the images, however, can be just OK in a bright sunlight setting to terrible indoors. The site should shore this up and use equipment for stills that deals adequately with the noise present at high ISO settings.
Although I am using this as my primary video site, I wish they would offer more quality in terms of the photo galleries.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IMO, who would enjoy this site: Video fans, breast-lovers, and those who salivate over curvy women with a little bit of meat on their bones.
IMO, who won't enjoy this site: Those who prefer slim and petitie figures, prefer extreme hardcore action, or photo-hounds not interested in videos.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Grades(obviously subjective):
Amount of Content: B+
Video Image Quality: A
Video Composition: A-
Photo Image Quality: D
Photo Composition: C+
DL Speeds: C-
The Models: A
XXX Action: B
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suggestions for improvement:
-- Pick up the DL speeds a bit.
-- More attention to photo quality. This site is excellant for high-quality videos. It would be an outstanding ste if the photos were up to the same standards.
As with any review, these are just my subjective opinions and YMMV.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- She's very hot and a great hot-wife
- Great attitude and personality
Cons:
- Site is just crap. Navigation is bad and just Looks very cheesy.
- Thought I was joining a site, and it looks more like some kind of social networking/forum crap. Not interested in seeing uploaded photo's from some other members fat ugly cow wife..
- Video's are ok but not particularly compelling.
- Photo's are just screen sgrabs
Bottom Line:
I wish this site was better. I have been thinking of joining for a couple of years and was immediately disappointed.
Didn't know it was a members oriented site with lots of junk and posts from other members uploaded. Mostly fat unattractive women.
What I wanted was video/photos of a great hotiwfe brandi... what I got was disappointing...
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Jackie is and has always been my ideal hotwife
- Pretty and sexy, great fun personality
- Good role play...
Cons:
- Lots of very old and low res content
- Web site organization and navigation is just a complete utter disaster
- Seems that quite a bit of content has been removed that used to be available.
- Not updated very often, sometimes the supposed updates are things I remember seeing several years ago. I'm not completely sure it is being updated with new content. sorta seems reject stuff from log ago dug up.
- Sometimes it can go a couple of months without even a token update. (i.e. small incremental update to existing post)
- The photography is not good. Lots of out of focus stuff posted.
- Forums are rarely if ever updated...
Bottom Line:
You know I used to love this site. And I've been subscribing on an off since about 1999. I want it to be good, since I love her. but I've just been very disappointed and cancel before the first month is up.
Jackie is Hot and sexy and by far my favorite hotwife out there. But the site blows and seems to have degraded quite a bit over the last few years...
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
The scenes on hardcoreyouth.com are made by the same crew who makes scenes for firstanalquest.com and some other Euro teen sites. They have the same filming style, same sets, same actors, etc....so my review of this site will be essentially the same as my review of firstanalquest.com.
-As with a lot of these European sites, the best thing about this site are the gorgeous, young girls. Just about every girl on this site looks to be 18 or 19. If you're familiar with Euro teen porn, you'll recognize all the regular girls from that world.
-some good anal action if you like anal (about 45 percent of the scenes have anal).
-downloadable files are consistent and good quality WMV (960x540, 3129 kbps, 29 fps)
Cons:
-Like all of the scenes made by this group, the camera work is not great. They waste too much time on closeups and don't show the girl's whole body enough. Too often the camera will be zoomed in on just her face or just or vag. I find myself thinking "ZOOM OUT! SHOW HER WHOLE BODY!" I prefer camera work like that found in the scenes at tryteens.com - very zoomed out to show off the girl's whole body.
-small site. not many scenes, and not many updates
-Simplistic, outdated site design. Not as easy to navigate as some others
-they use mostly one male actor. I belive he is known as "Timo Hardy" in the industry. There is sometimes another male actor who looks similar to him. Unfortunately, Timo Hardy often can't keep his dick hard, and he is in a lot of the scenes.
Bottom Line:
I got access to Hardcore Youth as a bonus site included with tryteens.com.
Although hardcoreyouth.com is included as part of the Teen Core Club network, it is simply a bonus site and it is not run by the same people as the Teen Core Club. Hardcore Youth uses a different filming style than the scenes made by the Teen Core Club crew.
The Hardcore Youth scenes are made by the same crew who makes the scenes for firstanalquest.com, and some other European teen sites (I have seen some of the scenes from this crew on the Teen Mega World network as well). I have been looking at the Euro teen sites for a while now, and you can easily spot the scenes made by this crew based on the camera work and actors. As a result, the scenes on Hardcore Youth look exactly the same as their other scenes - for me that is a bad thing since I'm not a fan of their filming style (see my comments in "cons" section above).
The crew that does these scenes often uses the same male actor known as Timo Hardy. This guy seems to be the most frequently used male actor in Eastern European porn. I have seen him in a lot of scenes on various Eastern European networks. Unfortunately he can't get his dick hard very often. Google his name and you'll instantly recognize him if you're familiar with European teen porn. It seems Timo is in pretty much every scene filmed by this crew.
There are a few decent scenes on this site, but I would not pay just for this site alone. This site is intended to be just a "throw away" bonus site that you get when you join one of the main sites in the Teen Core Club network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Choice of billing companies. Available choices are CCBill, Segpay and Zombaio.
-True high definition videos at 1280x720.
-Works with download managers. Downloads were fast as the file sizes are under 100MB for at most five minutes.
-No download limits.
-New videos every day and recently a new set of around 30 photos are also being posted daily. As of today there are 239 videos and 1439 photos.
-Mostly very attractive women with nice legs. Even the paid models seem very natural and not glam. The feeling you get is that you may see these women in the street.
-The site offers a way to communicate with other members, invite a friend, create a profile and upload your own videos and photos. Nice features that so far are not being used.
Cons:
-Only one download choice, MP4. Maybe it is my computer, but I have trouble with that type of file. I converted the videos to AVI using AVI Media Converter.
-The photos do not have the option of being zipdownloaded.
-The most recent photos are only 1200x800. Not quality in todays porn.
-Practically no variety in the models. Nearly every one is white, thin and in their early 20s.
-Very softcore. Until recently the most you would see is a view of panties under a skirt.
Bottom Line:
This site has changed its focus over the nine months it has been online. The oldest videos show a cameraman following women on the streets around town. At some point he gets a camera into position close to the model and gets film of what the woman is wearing underneath. The feeling that comes across is of an invasion of privacy on unknowing women. I feel that the issue of consent is important and these scenes made me feel a bit uncomfortable. How the cameraman kept from getting hit by his victims or even arrested is a mystery. If these scenes were staged, they did a really good job of making them seem unscripted and unrehearsed.
Most scenes were filmed in Russia, as you can clearly see writing in their alphabet. Some scenes were filmed in Guatemala as well. I suspect they were filmed for another site as they often have watermarks for Spyguate, a name I don't recognize. The photos from this time are similar in theme and style.
More recently, there is a distinct change in style. Professional, non glam Russian models play up to the camera in unabashed exhibitionism. The models are attractive and create a good sexy show. There is some nudity, a lot of tease, making nice videos that make me want to watch them over and over. There is a pleasing balance of whole body and closeups. Many of the models have multiple videos, with different levels of tease and different locales.
The photo sets also have been featuring professionals in scenes that can only be described as exhibitionist. There is a feeling of sexiness, even in photos that are not totally nude.
My overall impression is of a site that has found its place as tease, with some partial nudity. The sexiness is undeniable. With daily updates, and a winning formula, I can see myself resubscribing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Over 500 amateur models featured.
They do mean amateur too. There is everything here from petite boyish to BBW, barely legal to mature, stunningly pretty, through 'next door' to downright scary!
+ Models seem to enjoy themselves. Always a plus to me.
The Webmaster seems to be directly involved in the shooting & whilst encouraging going to full body nudity, does not press the models to do anything they are not comfortable with.
The flip side of this is that he doesn't stop them if they are enjoying themselves. ;)
+ The models are treated with respect
+ Full strips to nude appears to be the norm, sometimes a variety of outfits are featured(..briefly).
+ Zips available
+ HD Video available.
Not being a video guy I really can't give a view on this other than they look OK to me.
+ Site is nicely presented & functional, especially so given this is not a big budget operation.
+ Friendly & communicative Webmaster, who also does the photography.
+ Comprehensive FAQ page
Cons:
-Some info. seems fragmented & conflicts. At writing, the header on the Amateur page says 44985 pics/651 videos/402 Amateurs. Very out of date. Same page lower down 581 Sessions 76337 Images 2237 Videos. No mention of the currently 517 models.
-Sets seem rushed, there are very few fully clothed shots, often even the fleeting one or two often are not full body shots. It would be nice to to have ten or a dozen or so fully clothed shots before the stripping just to assess & build up anticipation.
-When the model has come with a variety of outfits, there is very little material featured of each. That rushed feeling again.
-Not a lot of material of each model available. A few return for another shoot, but not many. The studio location is something to do with that. Thumbnails crop the full image. Sometimes a vert. format thumbnail hides a hor. format shot.
-Only 1 pic res. available typ.1200x800
-Zip files need renaming, they come with a sequential number only.
-Barely any model bio
Bottom Line:
Well, owing to a neat trial deal I took the plunge & thought I would share my findings.
Updates are 2 - 3 a week.
Split between photoset & video is roughly 50/50
Possibly because of the specific naming & targetting of this site it had slipped under my radar. Whilst the material is almost exclusively softcore, it features quite a bit more than the just topless material the site naming implies.
I am pleased I tried it, because it is pretty much on topic for my FC2N fetish! ;)
( Fully clothed to nude...An acronym coined by my friend Auxilia )
For me, the style needs to be expanded. Specifically, the rushed feeling needs to be addressed.
The Webmaster is aware of it and has lengthened the shoots from 1 hour to 3 IIRC
I do feel, the uploaded sets still need editing more benignly though, as I mentioned above.
As it stands there are only a few shots in each set which hit the spot for me.
They are there, in ones & twos but I just need a lot more of that style in each set.
If you are looking for anything other than solo softcore then really this site is not for you.
If however, you like me, like seeing geniune amateurs strip naked....it is certainly worth a punt.
I should also mention that some of the models featured are in advanced stages of pregnancy, in some cases I quite like that, but know others don't.
It is so near.
Another nearly, but not quite for me.
In case you didn't realise, both the pros & cons would have been longer but in both cases I ran out of space! :0(
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-- A large amount of content.
-- Easy site navigation
-- Diverse sub-site niches.
-- Decent video work for an amateur studio.
-- Very sexy amateur models with varying body types.
Cons:
-- Terrible photo image quality--lots of noise and color issues.
-- DL Speeds seem to be a bit lacking.
-- Older videos can drop off in quality.
-- There is often small-talk or audible directing in videos.
-- Did I mention they could use a proper camera for stills?
Bottom Line:
Background:
My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.
I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Good:
I decided to try BangBros as I have rented some of their videos in the past and enjoyed their work. Although I primarily prefer photos, I do enjoy their video presentations more than most of the stuff I have come accross out there in pornland. Part of this is due to the models themselves--pretty, natural amateurs from young amateur girls of college-age all the way to chesty MILF. I also really like the video work. It is down-to-Eqarth and they don't go overboard with lighting or other elements you find in the professional studios. There are intros to the videos and a bit of an element of tease to many presentations. They don't jump right into the action.
I found the site navigation to be very easy and straightorward. As far as content, the site should appeal to many interests and fills a number of niches. The subsites include subjects such as handjobs, feet, breasts, buns, latin, afro--a lot of bases are covered. The women also are generaly very beautiful, amateur models. There are few of the plastic runway model-types with softball shaped implants. The theme here trends towards shapely, natural beauty. BangBros has some of the best natural, amateur models I have come accross.
The Bad:
DL Speeds are a bit hit-or-miss.I never timed-out but there were periods where things slowed to a crawl.
As far as video content, there are a number of things to be annoyed with. The audio feeds often contain annoying noises and sounds such as dropped equipment, active vocal directions to the models, and general small-talk that can border on the rediculous. I understand that this is an amaetur studio and not a Hollywood production set with a soundstage. However, more care could be used in this regards, IMO.
The Ugly:
It is obvious from the image quality that the photographer is either using a cheap digital camera or using the video recorder itself to take stills. Images seem to unviersally suffer from white balance issues, purple fringing, and noise is often prevalent. The truth is, I could get better quality by taking images with my IPhone. The actual compsoitions are not terrible, just often repetitive and it is obvious by the style that they were composed by a videopgrapher, not a photographer.
Dedicated SLR kits are not terribly expensive these days--Hint, Hint. Please go down to Best Buy or Target and get something on sale from last year's discount bin. Even with the cheapo plastic lenses that come with the kit, you will find the produced image quality is light-years ahead of what is currently available in the image galleries.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
With all that being said, I do enjoy the videos and although I prefer still images to video, I plan on sticking around for a while and making this my dedicated video site. I have always enjoyed BangBros videos.
As a video site, I wouldn't hesitate to reccomend it. If you are going there for the photos, you can do a lot better and my advice is look elsewhere.
As with all opinions, just my two cents.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Grades:
Quantity of Material: A
Site Navigation: A
Video Quality: A
Video Compositions: A
Photo Image Quality: D-
Photo Compositions: C
DL Speed: C-
The Models: A
The XXX Action: B+
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Good looking site, easy navigation for me. quality videos.
Cons:
IT'S A CLONE SITE!!! You can get all the same videos and a hole lot more at TEEN MEGA WORLD
Bottom Line:
I'm a current member at Teen Mega World and have been for over six months. When i joined that site, I didn't know they were all the same movies as Teen Mega World. Better choice would be to enter Teen Mega World, A hole lot of more videos, and just as good quality.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
RSS Feed
