| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(2)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+A network of 28 sites.
+You can access all the sites from the main page.
+They update with about 12 new scenes per month which are broken among their 6 active sites.
+Over 2600 scenes to choose from.
+The vast majority of the scenes have an both a video and photoset.
+Videos are in WMV and most of them are in a single WMV file.
+All photosets can be downloaded in a single zip file. Resolution is 1200x800 for most of these.
+All content is dated and they show upcoming updates. |
| Cons: |
-21 of the sites are no longer updating and the other six don't update on a weekly basis.
-It is hard to tell how much of the content is leased but there appears to be a significant amount that is.
-Most of the videos are not in HD and full downloads are only available in WMV.
-A percentage of the older videos are split in multiple video files.
-Many of the sites content could be under one banner since the content is the same as other sites.
-Scenes have no tags so no way of doing a search using tag words.
-There is no real search system since you can only look under the performer's name or the site itself.
-Most of the performers are not known under the name they are given on this network. |
| Bottom Line: |
This network has a lot of content and I don't know if it matters that a percentage of it is leased because it's stuff you might not have anyway. The bigger issue is that a lot of this content is getting old because 2 of the sites stopped updating in 2010-2011, 4 sites stopped in 2009 and 15 stopped in 2007-2008. That only leaves 7 sites still active and these update with only 2-3 scenes per month.
*I have posted a review of almost all of their active sites and these are only about a year old. I know that others have reviewed some of their sites so I'm instead posting info on some of the other sites that aren't active anymore or those that don't have or deserve a full review.
**They've added a new anal themed site called young anal tryouts but it only has 34 scenes and a percentage of these are leased. That wouldn't be so bad but some of the exclusif scenes are shot using a tripod so you get shots from the same angle and no zooming or paning during the scene. The girls are really cute but I would never join this network for their scenes because you can either get them elsewhere or they suck.
**You will notice that TBP doesn't post one of their sites called horny thief tales. I don't know why but I can guess so I will simply say that they have 46 scenes, it's exclusif content and they are still updating with about 2 scenes per month. I've never actually downloaded any of their scenes so couldn't do an honest review anyway
**young porn home videos is a site where I know that some of the content is leased because I recognize the scene. They have 84 scenes and the quality in most of them is bad to awfull. Most of the videos have an amateur feel to them with tripod only shots, night-vision cameras, bad lighting, fuzzy shots and so on.
**young lesbian porn appears to be all leased content with 69 scenes to choose from. The scenes are next to impossible to review because the content is too ecletic, quality varies a lot and only 15 of the scenes have an accompanying video.
**drilled mouths is appears to be an oral sex themed site with 46 scenes but where a large percentage of the girls also have sex with the guy so why call the sites makes no sense. Content appear to be partiallt leased and qulaity varies from scene to scene.
**creampied sweeties is exactly what it sounds like. They have 40 scenes, some of them are probably leased and quality varies.
**They have many other sites that could probably have been under one of two different site names but the recuring theme among all of them is that they are no longer updating, a lot of leased material, quality of the content varies a lot and most of the sites have very little content.
***I don't know if anyone should join the network for any of these sites because you might already have the content and even if you don't then you might not want it anyway. You should join the network for the active sites and use these as a bonus instead.***
My score is for the entire network and not based on these sites. |
|
05-22-12 08:30am
Replies (4)
|
Review
2
|
18 Pussy Club
(1)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+A nice selection of 251 Eastern European models between the ages of 18 and 20 years old.
+Nearly 950 photosets to view online or dowloand.
+All photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution varies from 800x1200 to 1067x1600.
+All the content is dated. |
| Cons: |
-Only 195 videos and most of these are broken up into 3 or more small clips.
-The vast majority of the content is solo with the odd toy use and a few b/g scenes.
-Site is now dead because the last update is in 2008.
-I'm not sure how much of the content is exclusif (if any) but I know that some of it is leased.
-Most of the models are given a name that is not the one they are usually known under.
-There is a search box but I tried different things and the results were not very good.
-Some of the models have only photosets while others have only videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Let me first say that I got access to this site through my teens analyzed membership and I am glad that I didn't actually fork any money over for this unimpressive site.
*Here are the things they do right. They have a wide selection of mostly teen models that should please most peoples taste. The bulk of the content is solo teasing with a very nice mix of clothed to all nude with an emphasis on showing the entire body rather than concentrating on just a few parts. Some of the models have more than one set or video so that can be great if she is one of your favorites.
*Here are the things they do wrong. Most of the models only have one or two phototsets and/or videos so unless you luck in then you are not going to get much out of this site. Part of the content is leased material and quite old now. Renaming models is so annoying because it makes finding their more common name much harder.
**The bottom line is that this is a very poor stand alone site even for the most ardent fan of softcore porn and this is made worse by the fact that it's pretty old and contains some leased material.
**I can't recommend to anyone unless the content from the other sites you get appeals to you and my score is based on that reason. |
|
01-20-13 09:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
3
|
18 Stream
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-You get access 2 2 other sites.
-You get a large part of the content from the sites owned by tony bucks CO.(see Cons)
-Videos can be dowloaded in quicktime, mpeg and WMV but only the wmv allows low, medium or high quality videos.
-Phototsets can be downloaded as a complete zip file. |
| Cons: |
-Their navigation system has many holes in it from some models name not being listed or some files being misleading. They have to do some major clean up because it's a mess.
-Their dating system makes no sense because they claissify their scenes by the number of days, weeks or months when it was added.
-The content of this site is almost exclusively taken from all the other sites under the tony bucks Co banner so why join this site when you can get it all with the spunky bee membership? |
| Bottom Line: |
-This site is the perfect example of what annoys me about some internet companies. They created this site so that customers could get access to a large of the content on their other sites without having to join another site but you aren't really getting anu exclusif material. you simply have it under one roof.
-Since the navigation is such a mess and I have access to almost all the content with my membership to spunky bee then it was really hard for me to give a proper score.
-There is plenty of content to be had so many people will be satisfied but avoid this site if you have been a past member of any of the other sites under the tony bucks banner or better yet just join spunky bee and you'll get it all. |
|
03-21-11 09:21am
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
18 Virgin Sex
(1)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to a total of 28 sites.
+Content is dated and the update with 2 new scene each month.
+Their selection of performers is excellent and includes many of the popular European models.
+They have 226 videos that you can download them in WMV and resolution is a decent 832x464
+The videos each have their accompanying photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file. The pic resolution is 1200x800.
+Most of the performers have a tleast one scene on the other sites of the network. |
| Cons: |
-There's a synopsis for each scene but the info is not very accurate and that's annoying because they don't assign any tags on their scene to do a search.
-They don't have a real search option except using the performers name or the name of a site.
-I can't tell just how much of the content is leased but the the bulk of the updates after 2009 are mostly all leased.
-This site suffers from the renaming syndrome so most of the performers on this site aren't under the name they are normally know by.
-Only 6 of the actual sites in the network are still updating. All the others stopped updating in 2009 or before.
-There is a pretty large amount of leased material within the entire network with only some sites having all exclusif content.
-You can only download the videos in WMV and less than a dozen of these are in HD. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is one of the better sites in the network and the second one with the most content. The videos are all pretty well shot and the action is also very good. There is a wide selction of young European performers and they all look lovely. My biggest annoyance is that since they don't have a proper scene breakdown in the synopsis and they don't have any tags then you either download the entire network or you do like me and check part of the content for each video to see if it's worth downloading.
*I think anyone that likes to watch young Eastern European women have sex on video should be statified with the content. There isn't enough content hear to justify the join price unless you plan on downloading content from some of the content on the other sites.
**Some of the people that should be nervous about joining this site are those that have been members of teen mega world, 18x girls and smack my bitch because I'm pretty sure that some of their leased content is on this site.** |
|
05-17-12 11:26am
Replies (2)
|
Review
5
|
4 Real Swingers
(1)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-All exclusif content.
-Over 500 videos of which 200 are now offered in 1280x720 and 20 in 1920x1080.
-They are still updating with new content.
-They offer a search option that allow members to find a specific video or photoset using niche or keywords.
-Access to 10 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-Too many of the videos are of short duration with barely more than 10 minutes of action.
-Too many of the videos have bad camera angles in them.
-Too many of the videos are cam shows.
-Photos cannot be downloaded as a single file.
-A small part of the bonus sites is leased material. |
| Bottom Line: |
-I was anxious to see what was offered on this site based on past reviews but it must be one of those cases where taste vary because I found very little to like about the content offered on this site and most of the others in the network.
-I didn't really buy the swinging couple that like to film their little parties angle because many of the other players have their own website so it becomes more like a bunch of solo amateur that get together and film themselves having sex.
-I didn't find enough content worth downloading and most of that will never make my keep list so I'm not going to be able to offer a suggestion on who will enjoy their content. |
|
06-25-11 10:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
6
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Decent selection of natural and enhanced models to choose from.
-Photosets can be dowloaded in 800 x 600 and 1600 x 1200 resolution.
-They are still updating.
-Content is dated.
-You can search by models name, body type hair color and type of shoot. |
| Cons: |
-The bulk of the videos are streaming only.
-They only have 270 videos.
-They only have 150 photosets.
-They only have 13 magazines.
-There is a large logo on each pic.
-Their preview pages are serioulsy misleading.
-Their pages are clutered with offers from other sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
-There must have been some serious changes at 40something since January of this year because TBP gave this site an 82 and claimed that videos were downloadable. In my book 10 downloadable videos out of 270 is not enough to claim that the site allows downloads.
-This is one of the worst case of half truth and lies that I've seen a site do in many years. I joined based on the TBP review and the sites own preview pages. First lie. They claim that you can get access to every 40something magazine ever printed. Yes, you do but you will have to buy them so not free. Second lie: They mention all the videos and pic sets that the model has and they do say x number of videos from other sites but if they aren't availbale on your site then why bring them up. The only conclusion I see is that they know that people like me will assume that these videos are available on their site but content can be also be found on those other sites.
This site belongs to the score group which owns a huge amount of other sites but because of this site I don't think I will ever join any of their otrher sites for fear that they are lying on that site as well.
***This site is to be avoided at all cost or you will regret wasting your 20$ like I am at this very moment.*** |
|
04-17-11 06:50pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
7
|
50Plus MILFs
(2)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They offer content from a niche that is rare to find on the net.
+They offer all exclusif content.
+They have a surprisingly wide selection of models who for the most part look natural.
+These women handle some pretty huge dicks and a fair amount of them even do anal with said dicks.
+The sex is often quite good but(see con).
+There are 133 videos that can be streamed online with a resolution of 480p and 720p.
+All the videos have an accompanying photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution is at least 1200x800.
+They are still updating and it appears that it's anything from two to four updates per month.
+All content is dated.
+Many of the performers are unknowns so this is probably the only place you'll see them do this kind of stuff.
+You also get access to 60plus milfs. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest con against this site is that it's for all intense and purposes a streaming only site. You can only download videos released in the last six weeks.
-The sex is hardcore and quite good but there is no kissing at all which I found disapointing.
-The navigation could be improved with the addition of keywords but then again the site is so small that this isn't such a problem.
-The load time for streaming is inconsistent so that it will sometime load quickly and stream well and other times it takes a while for the video to load and you can forget skipping ahead or suffer slow load time.
-The same performer will sometime have more than one scene so that may or may not be a problem for some.
-These women are in their 50's and although they don't always look their age. They also don't look like young women anymore.
-Videos can only be downloaded in one resolution which is 640x360. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This site offers content that is badly underrepresented and therefore it is nice that it exist. It would be a lot nicer if all the videos were made available for download. They have their reason why they aren't but I've never really understood them.
*The important thing to know about this site is that you are watching women in their 50's have hardcore sex with men that are often half their ages and who plow into them like there is no tomorrow. This is not vanilla porn so if that is what you want then you'll want to stear clear because hard pounding vaginal and often anal sex is on the menu on this site. A significant amount of the male performers are Latino and African American so if interracial isn't your thing then you'll also want to stay away.
*The one thing that I wanted to see and which is lacking is kissing before and during the scene and strangely there isn't a single instance where you see this. Kissing would go a long way in increasing the heat factor and since there isn't any then that's make the scene less appealng than it could be.
**Of course making videos available for download would be nice and they lose points because they don't but not as many as some other sites might because their content is too rare to excessively penalize them for a business decision.** They probably already lose customers due to their no download policy anyway. |
|
12-27-12 08:14am
Replies (4)
|
Review
8
|
60 Plus MILFs
(1)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They offer content that is rare to see on the net and even more so when you consider that it stars North American women.
+The sex is surprisingly good considering the age of the performers.
+Content is dated and they appear to still be updating.
+Many of the performers look good for their age and seem to still be all natural. Not too mention that they appear to be mostly unknowns.
+You can see the age of each performer in the photo section of the site.
+You can download the photosets of each video as a single zip file and resolution is minimum 1200x800(but many of the pics are 1600x1063).
+You also get access to 50plus milfs. |
| Cons: |
-This site like it's sister site 50plus does not allow members to download videos that are older than 6 weeks.
-The site is quite tiny with only 72 videos and they don't update regularly or with any kind of schedule so that number does not grow by much each year.
-Many of their performers have more than one video on this site and on 50 plus so you are getting some similar content.
-Since these women are in their 60's then they don't look like women under 40 or let alone under 30. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I debated whether I should do a seperate review of this site or simply add the info on my 50plus review since the transition from both site is seemless to members but I decided to do a seperate one just in case Score decides to split the sites. This way each site will have it's own review and that is important because this site is so much smaller than the olther one.
*The thing to know about this site is that it's women in their 60's having hardcore sex with men that are definetely half their age or younger and don't let the gray ins ome of their hair fool you because they can give as good as they take. Sadly the site also doesn't have any kissing between the performers which is too bad because that would add a lot more passion and heat to the scenes.
*They don't allow downloads other than those released in the last six weeks but because they don't update as often as their 50plus site then you actually get less for your money.
**Bottom line is that there are almost no sites that cater to this type of fetish so even though it's mostly a streaming only site then it could be worth joining at least once to see what it offers and since you get access to 50plus milfs then that's not a bad deal. Of course if they seperate both sites then it will probably take years before they have enough content to make a visit worth it. that is unless more 60 years old start doing porn.** |
|
12-27-12 06:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
9
|
Alanna Thomas
(1)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Alanna is a rather cute 30+ yrs old blond woman with a penchant for swinging.
-There are more than 200 videos.
There are over 400 photosets and they can all be downloaded as a complete zip file. The resolution varies a lot from set to set so it's difficult. I can confirm that many of them are at least 1152x864.
-You get access to the TAC amateur and chickpass networks. |
| Cons: |
-Their updates are dated but those dates are not worth anything since the content found on it is often much older than the date posted. I found videos from 2007 that are dated 2011.
-Their navigation system is a little confusing. You can search for videos and photosets by different categories but if that scene includes interacial, anal, and a cumshot than it's going to be located in all of these locations. Members have to be carefull not to download the same content multiple times.
-Too many of the videos are broken into 2 or more parts and they aren't huge files.
-They claim that some of their videos have dvd quality but that false. They barely qualify for moderate qulaity. I found that many videos had below average quality.
-Some of their content are scenes from swinging parties that star other internet performers so its also available on their site as well as Alanna's. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Maybe my expectation are too high for these types of sites. I mean this is suppose to be an amateur site but then again can you really call yourself an amateur if you've been doing this for more than 5 years. I think that Alanna is a cute above 30 woman with a nice body that suits her age. If only the content on this site was as good as her than she would have something special.
-I found far too many videos that were filmed using a lower quality video camera and poor lighting so that most of the videos cannot be watched full screen and often the action is difficult to make out. Then you add a less than stellar camera guy and you get a video that's blurry, semi-dark, bad camera angles and the always pleasant swinging camera because we don't want to edit that from the video.
-I downloaded about half a dozen videos but I'll only keep about 2 of those. The rest aren't worth the hard disk space.
**The only reason I gave the site a higher score than my review seems to imply it deserves is in large part because of the bonus content and the join price is less than 20$.** |
|
07-04-11 09:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
10
|
Alexis Golden
(1)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Alexis is a an attractive 40yrs old woman with a very active sex life.
+There are 105 videos which can be downloaded in WMV(resolution is 640x480).
+You can stream the videos in the Windows player.
+You can stream past web cams shows.
+Sites updates with new content once a week. |
| Cons: |
-There are 105 videos but it's really only about 50 scenes since they've broken the scenes into 2 or more parts.
-Some of the videos is leased material.
-There are 144 phototsets but you can't download them as complete zip files and the quality of pics is average at best.
-Navigation on the site is limited to a couple of icons orand page numbers.
-There is a link to a VOD site with some of Alexis content which still has me scratching my head since you'd have to pay extra money to view the streaming content that you are getting with your membership. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Here is another solo model site that manages to fail because they do so many wrong things that they overshadow the good ones. The first thing a solo model site has to have is a personality. This is afterall the models site and it should reflect her in some way. It shouldn't just be a repository of pics and videos. The site should include stuff that can't be found elsewhere.
*If you are going to offer videos then make sure they are complete scenes and not in multiple parts of a bigger one. It's bad enough that the videos are only 640x480 but to have to download 2 or more parts to get the complete scene is more than a little annoying.
*To make a site seem more personal requires pics that are more than stills from the videos. They should include some glamour shoots and even some day to day stuff that isn't pornagraphic in nature. This helps members feel like they know you better. Of course once you talk pics than please make sure the quality, quantity and most importantly that you can download the phototsets as complete files.
**This isn't a terrible site except for anyone looking for pics but it is really disapointing.
If you want to see Alexis have hardcore sex and down't mind that the scenes are in parts than you should be satisfied. |
|
07-29-11 06:28pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
11
|
All Over 30
(2)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They have nearly 530 models to choose from.
-They have over 2150 videos.
-They have over 5900 phtosets.
-Movies can be streamed online with flash player
-All the videos can be downloaded as a complete file in either WMV or MPG. They also have some videos.
-All photosets can be downloaded as a complete file. They all offer pics 1024 and 1536 format and some of the newer ones also come in 2400.
-They have an active forum for their members.
-They have a calender showing the updates for the next 7 days.
-Update are a mixture of 5 photosets/videos.
-Content is all dated. |
| Cons: |
-The majority of photosets and videos are mostly softcore to midore so very little hardcore to choose from.
-There are nearly 3 times more photosets than videos.
-The majority of models are 41 or less so you might want to look elsewhere if you were looking for older ladies.
-They don't update with the models photoset and corresponding video at the same time. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is an impressive site with a large library of content but I can't help but feel disapointed that there is so little hardcore to be found inside and also that there are so few videos. I may have gottent my hopes up thinking that there would be much more than there really is.
-The site should update with a photoset and the video that goes with it instead of doing it over a certain period of time.
-This is a hard site to recommend because I'm not sure exactly who they are trying to cater to. It's a mature site but since most of the models are in their 30's then that might not be what some of us consider very mature. There is hardcore but again not that much so that might not be enough to satisfy those people. There weren't too many glamour videos or photosets so again that cuts another group. I guess if you want to see women from the age of 30 to 41 do solo shoots and some fetich and hardscore then this might be the site for you. I suspect most others will be a disapointed like me. |
|
05-29-11 09:57am
Replies (5)
|
Review
12
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to the Evil Angel network.
-Special price of 20$ through TBP/PU.
-Large library of material(based on newtwork).
-Early access to scenes from just released dvd's.
-Some exclusive material.(based on network).
-Good Dowload speed.
-Videos can be streamed in flash or downloaded in WMV and some in Quicktime as well.
-The videos all come in at least medium or high
quality. |
| Cons: |
-The navigation speed within the network is quite bad. Clicking on an icon and waiting 10 seconds or more for a response is quite common.
-The search engine is a mess. Good luck trying to find a specific scene or actress.
-This is mostly non-exclusive material. This is more important for members of videobox that also took the EA option. |
| Bottom Line: |
-In many ways the network feels more like an EA promotional tool than an actual stand alone site.
It makes sense since EA is possibly the top porn studio at the moment and having a site that showcases some of their material is sure to attract more buyers to their dvd's.
-The network has potential and if one day they decide to improve it then I would recommend it.
The way it stands at this moment. I would stay away. The satisfaction you may get is not worth the frustration you are sure to receive.
-I think EA should decide if they need or want a stand alone network or simply make their entire library available to sites like Videobox. It's less profitable through Videobox, but you get far more traffic.
-I debated what score to give them. I love most of EA's stuff and any site gives me acces to their content is great. That would be worth a high 90 score, but the navigation speed kills it for me. I don't have the patience needed to find what I want. |
|
11-01-09 08:53am
Replies (2)
|
Review
13
|
Anal Teen Angels
(1)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They have some of the first anal scenes from many of the newest Eastern Europeans girls.
-They currently have over 70 scenes.
-Videos can be downloaded in wmv or h.264 and both come in multiple levels of quality.
-Acess to 30 sites with this membership and I'd say that at least half of those are worth it.
-A reward program that allows you access to more sites whithe the network for each subsequent month you remain a member. |
| Cons: |
-The new site design is still hard to get used to. This is more for returning members.
-Surfing speeds are still a little slow but seem to be imporving.
-The names of the models are not always those seen on other sites.
-The choice of some of the males could be a little better. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site that I started keeping track off when it was added to the 21Sextury network. I was tempted to join but I didn't like the bundle of sites offered with the membership. I got access through the reward program for my pix and video membership.
They have some gorgeous models doing anal for the first time and some of them were met-art models. Even the models that have done anal on other site seem to look better here or at least the quality seems to be better.
I highly recommend this site if you like teens getting analyzed. |
|
02-06-10 08:48am
Replies (4)
|
Review
14
|
Anjanette Astoria
(1)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Production value on many of the videos is very impressive with the use of soundtracks, scripts, dialogue, visual effects and editing.
+Anjanette is a beautiful 38 years old women with natural 36D breast who does hot sex scenes.
+Videos can be downloaded in MP4. The resolution varies from 640x352 to 848x480 and the bit rate also varies from 2300 to over 4000 kbps.
+There are 24 videos and they update with 1 new video each week.
**I normally don't put cost as a pros but 10$ for one month is hard to complain about. |
| Cons: |
-The lower video resolution means that videos aren't as crisp on full screen.
-The use of a soundtrack is a good idea but not when the music is nso loud that it overlaps the action.
-The use of visual effects in some of the videos can be a plus or a negative for some members.
-There are 24 videos but some of them are parts of a larger scene.
-There are no real search options and navigation is pretty much limited to next page or previous page.
-There are only 11 photosets and the quantity of pics in each set is tiny. not to mention that you can't download the sets as a complete file. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Anjanette is beautiful woman as well as an excellent sex performer and that adds a lot of heat to the scenes. She's not affraid of doing hardcore so that is also a plus. The main drawback for me is the quality on some of the videos. 848x480 is not bad but 640x352 is. This is a new site so they may address this in future videos.
*-Another necessary improvement will have to be the navigation system. As more content is added then it will be harder for new members to find scenes unless they want to scroll through many pages of videos.
**-Not a necessary improvement but one that will garner her more members are the photosets. A key part of good solo model sites are the many different phototsets that are exclusif to their site. If you are going to offer pics than make sure they are of higher quality, that there are sufficient amounts of pics and can be downloaded as a complete set.
-I could say that if you are a fan of Anjanette then you have to join her site but I personaly had never heard of her until I saw her site on TBP. Now that I know who she is and what she does then I will keep track of her work. Her site is only 10$ so if you think she looks good and want to see her do some hardcore shoots then go ahead. |
|
07-22-11 07:37am
Replies (0)
|
Review
15
|
Back Room Casting Couch
(1)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusif.
+there are more than 190 scenes.
+The vast majority of the girls are amateurs and this is one of the few places you'll see them do hardcore.
+They have a wide variety of teen models. |
| Cons: |
-They don't seem to updating very often but I can't say how often they do because they don't put dates on their content.
-The videos can only be downloaded in WMV and resolution is a rather poor 640x360.
-All the videos are shot in POV and the guy doesn't really know how use a camera.
-The interview part of the video is a complete waste of time and pure BS.
-All the scenes are shot in the same office and on the same couch and desk.
-There is no editing so a good chunk of the video is the guy moving the camera or tripod around the room.
-The sex is mediocre at best.
-Still no pics of any kind. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I only joined this site because I got a deal when I joined exploited college girls because you also get this one. This is my second time on this site and it will also be my final time.
*The premise for the site is very interesting and someone with talent should be able to make a killing but the guy responsible for this mess either doesn't have any talent or simply doesn't care about the final product. You would think that someone who's been doing this for as long as he has would get better with time but I did not see a difference between the newer videos and the older stuff.
*All the flaws that were there in 2010 are still there. You have the stupid interview where it's hard to believe the BS being said. You have his hiden face whenever it's in the shot. The videos are all POV and tripod shot so that's already a negative. There are many bad camera angles, weird cut in the action, bad camera position during the action so that the shots are wasted, he likes to talk during the video.
*Shooting in an office environment with a chair, desk and the typical casting couch is such a bad idea because the room is small, the performer is never really made comfortable and this nis especially true during the sex because she will either be on her back on the hard desk(no padding of any kind), bent forward over the desk or having sex on the sofa which happens to be a few feet in front of the sofa whcih means that you can't really use the tripoid appropriately during what should be the most comfortable part of the video for the girl.
**It's hard to recommend this mess to anyone but anyone who wants to see amateurs have sex and don't really mind if the sex is badly shot, not very intense, where the male is not a good sex performer and where each video looks like the previous one might get something out of it. Everyone else should stay far away.** |
|
03-16-12 06:11am
Replies (11)
|
Review
16
|
Back Room Casting Couch
(1)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They have a nice mix of female body types.
-Many of the girls are amateurs or new to the porn biz.
-Nearly 150 videos.
-Videos appear to all be wmv.
-You can use a download manager. |
| Cons: |
-No photos of any kind.(screencaps would have been nice).
-Only one page so you have to keep scrollig down to find the next videos.
-You can only download 4 videos and that's with or without a download manager.
-All the scenes are POV and he uses a couple of cameras to give you different perspectives but the editing is so bad that some of the shot are of the guy playing with the camera while many of the others ones show bad angles of the action.
-All the scenes are filmed in the same office the desk or the floor.
-The guy never stops talking and that's fine in the interview part but you would hope that once the actions starts that he'd shut-up.
-The guy doesn't want to be identified so you have a pixelated circle whenenever there is a chance that we might see his face. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site has some good looking girls and most of these have never made it unto my porn radar so I was curious to see them in action. After having joined this site then I can honestly say, that I'm still curious to see them in action.
I'm glad that this guy has money to get girls to have sex with him on camera and his choice of girls is very good but I wish he cared enough about his customers to allow us to see them in action. Get a camera man or get a performer but don't try to be both.
If you want to see some really cute amateurs have sex and don't mind talking during the sex and the less than stellar camera shots then you might enjoy this site. |
|
12-11-10 07:09pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
17
|
Bang My Teen Ass
(1)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have some cute Eastern European models.
+Part of their content is exclusif.
+Videos can be dowloaded in 1280x720 resolution. |
| Cons: |
-Site is tiny with only 32 videos and not really updating with new content.
-The content is dated but they must change the date on a regular basis because the oldest scenes is dated in 2012 but the site has been active since 2009.
-A percentage of the content is leased material that is available on amny other sites.
-They have a search option but since they don't have tags or do not name any of the models so I'm not sure what you would search.
-The site is cluttered with third party advertising and there's no way to escape it no matter on which page you are. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I got access to this site with my teen analyzed membership and am I glad I did because this was always a site on my possible join list and I would have been royally pissed if i had paid any amount for this unimpressive site.
*This is not a very good site but they do have some nice videos and the girls are all pretty cute. of course you probably already have them if you are member of Eastern European pon sites but even if you don't then you probably have a similar scene with the same girl.
**There is very little to recommend this site. If you like the girls on the preview section than join TMW and you will probably get the same videos or very similar for less money and better quality.** |
|
01-16-13 05:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
18
|
Bangbros Network
(7)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They update with 2 or more scenes per day.
+They currently have over 5000 scenes to choose from.
+They have a wide selection of performers and they tend to lso have a slightly greater variety than the other sites with similar content.
+You can download the videos in WMV and MP4 and all videos since 2009 are offered in HD.(The HD is 1280x720)
+All the videos have an accompanying phototsets that can be downloaded as a single zip file. The resolution is 1200x800 on the last. the others appear to be 800x550.
+They have started to remaster some of their older scenes. |
| Cons: |
-A percentage of their updates are in fact remastered older scenes so not really new content.
-A percentage of their content is either only BJ or footjobs.
-They tag anal on many scenes but the only anal is maybe a finger
-They have some pop up adds on their main screen.
**-These following cons are in reference to the new site design and not the older site(see bottom line for info on old site).
-An annoying site design where it feels more like advertising for their other products and less about offering the best acces to this sites content.
-Search option are rather limited and results cannot be accessed chronologicaly.
-I always had to double click to get back to the previous page once I had selected a specific scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is the second best reality porn site after Brazzer. I guess they equal or surpass Brazzer depending on the type of porn you like. I still prefer the type of porn Brazzer does but I like scenario porn and this is not what these guys really do. Their idea of scenario porn is mostly the fake amateur girl agreeing to do porn right off the street.
*I think Bangbros shoots in Florida so they have access to a different group of performers than their West Coast counterparts. I think that's the reason why they have more interracial content vs the other sites. The interracial aspect may be a plus or a negative based on your preferences. They appear to employ some unknown male performers and that can sometime be a plus but I found it slightly negative because the guys are either not very good and sometime they aren't able to keep wood.
*It's nearly impossible for anyone that likes the type of porn that Reality king, Naughty America or Brazzer do to avoid joining Bangbros at least once. I know that I've done it more than once because they still have certain exclusif types of scenes not found on any of the similar sites. my last time on this site was a couple of years ago and scrolling through the past updates was bitter sweet for me because I noticed so many performers that shot only a couple of scene for thse guys and then disapeared from the industry.
*They currently have 96 remastered scenes so anyone that wanted to see some of their older content but wanted better quality may be satisfied butI mostly avoided those because most of them didn't appeal.
**In regards to the new design. My suggestion is that you simply log in to the old members sarea. It opens into another window and you will not have to deal with any of the issue found in the new site design.**
**The only people that might want to avoid this site are those that don't like interracial porn, BJ only and footjopb only stuff. If you remove those 3 things then you may find the pickings a litle small.** |
|
05-10-12 07:00am
Replies (17)
|
Review
19
|
Bangbros Network
(7)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-An excellent selection of models to choose from that cover most ethnicity, age groups and body type.
-They seem to have some exclusive models or at least some that have little to nothing elsewhere.
-A gigantic library of videos.
-Surfing and download speeds are pretty decent.
-The search engine allows to search by using multiple parameters like hair color, body type, fetish and many others.
-They update regularly. |
| Cons: |
-They give titles to each video but more often than not it doesn't include the models name. You have to enter the vid page to see her name.
-Their content is more like semi-pro porn than actual reality porn with little scenarios. I'd compare their content to Reality Kings.
-You can only download a full scene in WMV. You can choose MPG or WMV if you want to dowmload the scene in sections.
-The quality of the newer vids is pretty good but the older stuff is rather poor.
-They do not offer a preview of upcoming updates.
-The photosets aren't very good and screencaps are worse. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm groing through most of the top rated sites joined this one first then my score might have been higher but after seeing Brazzer & Naughty America then this one pales in comparaison.
They lost a few points right at the beginning when I had to click the video page to find the name of the model. You'd think that with a search engine like they have. They'd realise that we want to know the name of the model and we really don't want to click twice to get it.
The fact that they have such a large content and the cost of joining is so low helps them.
They might consider offering more video download options and higher resolution as well. |
|
12-05-09 12:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
20
|
Barbi's Slutty Adventures
(1)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
08-19-11 06:27pm (Update History)
Reason: false information given to members
|
| Pros: |
+Content is exclusif, dated and they update with a mixture of pics and videos at least once a week.
+Over 460 photosets which can be viewed online or can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+Over 230 videos.
+Videos can be streamed in Flash.
+Barbi does can shows at least once a week and you get free access to those as well as past archived shows.
+There is a nice search option with pre-selected keywords to help members find a particular video or pic set.
-Barbi post regular updates on her diary so you get to see her day to day life. |
| Cons: |
-Videos cannot be downloaded at this moment.
-You can stream videos in flash player but lag time is horrible.
-The content has a watermark that has changed in design, size and position over the years. I found that the older watermark was hard to miss and in an annoying position. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I've had my eyes on Barbi's site since I saw some leased content on a couple of other sites. She's a beautiful blue eyed blond woman in her 30's with a nice body who likes to do a variety of different sexual things and doesn't mind being filmed or have pictures taken while doing them. Now can you imagine my disapointment when I first joined and realised that you couldn't download any of the videos?
**I'm not sure when they stopped making videos available for download except to say that there was a review done in June and even then the videos seemed to be hard to download. All I can say is that I've been a member for 20 days and I still can't download them. I made inquiries two weeks ago and at the time I was told that it should be a couple more days. There are regular diary updates that say that they are working on a new site and that this should be done soon but these post go back more than 6 weeks and there is still no changes. The strange thing is that you can still download the photosets.
-This is an almost perfect solo model site where you can see that the people involve really care about giving the site a personality. which is why I feel bad about giving them a bad score.
***Serious crappy customer service***
I dropped my original score from 72 to 69 for the following reason. I wrote a comment that the site was going through a transition and that the videos were streaming only. I was never able to confirm otherwise because the new site went online 2 days before my membership expired and amazingly enough. I lost access to the site at the same time. I emailed epoch right away to see if they could see what was happening. They sent me an email with my log in info and said that everything was fixed. Of course it wasn't and my membership expired while we were still exchanginfg emails. Their last one only said they couldn't do anything anymore since my membership expired.she could do but I'm still waiting for an answer and it's now been 2 weeks since I sent my email. I'm quite pissed with the site because of their contined BS info to members that the new site was ready. Their last info to me personally was that the site was going up at least 3-4 days before my membership was expiring and promising that I could download videos.**** |
|
07-29-11 07:13am
Replies (2)
|
Review
21
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Membership gives you access to 14 other sites.
-Download speed is quite good using I.E and no dowmload manager.
-They have over 1000 videos in the network.
-The sex is all interracial going from mild to intense.
-There are quite a few videos with a little scenarios which adds to the fantasy aspect.
-A good choice of models with a greater emphasis on milf.
-Blacks on Blonde appears to still be updating. |
| Cons: |
-Blacks on blondes and Glory Hole seem to be the only 2 sites still releasing new content. It's difficult to tell because although they give you the release dates on the sites. I don't believe that they are accurate.
-The quality from site to site or from older to newer material is of varying quality.
-The more recent videos can be downloaded whole or in 3 parts but quite alot of the older material on the other sites is in multiple parts.
-Some of the sites do not have the option of downloading the complete set in one file. |
| Bottom Line: |
The main reason why I joined was because you got access to Spring Thomas and Katie Thomas with the membership. I've had my eye on the 3 sites for a long time. I wouldn't have joined them individually but in a package it was difficult to pass up.
I think this a very good join, download all the content you want and then don't comeback for a long time. I'm pretty sure Spring and Katie are no longer updating and most of the other sites are variations of black on blondes.
If you like IR, gangbang, milf, cum swallowing style of sex than you should give these guys a try. |
|
09-27-09 09:30am
Replies (2)
|
Review
22
|
Bound Gangbangs
(4)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Very well filmed scenes with intense multiple guys on one girl sex.
-All the videos have a little scenario which is explained by the performer during the interview at the beginning of each video.
-They have a good selection of models that cover different body types and age group as well.
-Videos can be downloaded in WMV Med or HD as well as MP4 Med or HD.
-The content is dated and they update with one new scene each week.
-There is a calendar for all upcoming Kink site shoots.
-You can use a download manager. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest issue with Kink sites as always been in regards to the photos. Kink sites brake photo sets into 3 or more sections. You can still download each section as a complete zip file but it would be nice to offer a complete photoset in one file.
-The site is still pretty small with only 19 videos. Mind you that wasn't a problem for me.
-Videos are all over an hour long so some might find them a little long. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is a departure for Kink and in my opinion a pleasant one. Here they have created a site where the the sex is center and BSDM is almost non-existant. When you couple that with the quality of porn produced by Kink and you have the best gangbang site on the net. The only thing that is holding it back is the size of the site. 19 videos is a tiny number and that might put some people off but the quality of what's availabe should more than satisfy anyone who's into this type of sex.
-The selection of models is about the only place where I`d like to see some improvement. They have a good selection but many of the models have done gangbangs elsewhere so they aren`t necessarily new to this type of sex. Of course it`s not every performer that is willing and able to film these types of scene.
-I highly recommend this site to anyone who loves well filmed multiple guys on girl scenes.
**To be avoided by anyone who's looking for gangbang scenes with a BSDM theme. You won't get enough to satisfy you.**
-My score is only because of the size of the site. I would have given this site an above 95. |
|
07-19-11 09:42am
Replies (7)
|
Review
23
|
Brazzers
(6)
99.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They update with over a dozen new scenes per week.
+They hire some of the top US performers.
+They now add one live Brazzer shoot every month and you can even purchase live shoots from their other sites like Twisty's, wicked and Mofos.
+You can download the videos in WMV, MPG4, ipod, HD720 and HD1080.
+You can download the photosets as a complete zip file and resolution varies based on the year of release. The ones from 2009 to now are 1600x2500.
+They shoot scenario style porn.
+They show upcoming updates.
+They have a jump to action option on their streaming system where you simply click on the fetish and the viedo will star from there.
+You can use a download manager.
+Download speeds are amazing. I can normally download a medium quality video in less than 2 minutes. |
| Cons: |
-The same performers tend to have multiple scenes on the site and many of them are similar in nature.
-A large percentage of their performers have tattoos and/or implants.
-They often use the same male performers so if you aren't a fan then you won't enjoy many of the videos.
-Their search system could use the option of searching for both the performer's name and a particular fetish. This is more important with performers with multiple scenes since you might have to search over a dozen of different videos to find the one you want.
-They don't hire that many ethnic performers but I don't think it's a question of choice as much as availability. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my favorite site of all time. I wrote a couple of cons but I can't say that they bother me all that much. I wish they would hire less performers with implants and/or tattoos but so many girls have them these days that the pool of all natural performer is getting smaller all the time.
*It's true that many girls have multiple scenes and that they do pretty much the same thing in many of them but that isn't always a bad thing and the number of girls with multiple scenes isn't as large as those with only a few. I guess I must love this site since this is the only one who's membership I have kept for over a year and I don't plan on cancelling it any time soon. The fact that I only pay 10$ a month for it is a part of why.
*I don't know if I can really add anything that other reviews haven't already said so all I'll do is say that if you want to see porn starring most US performers than this is one of the best site for it. If you want to see many US MILF's do porn than this is the site you want. If you want to see US perfromers do anal then again this is one of the best site for it.
*If you prefer to see European performers or you enjoy interracial porn then don't join this site because there is simply not enough content to satisfy your needs. |
|
11-27-11 11:32am
Replies (8)
|
Review
24
|
Brazzers
(6)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Porn with actual little stories that have good camera work, some hot sex, a decent run time, and dialogue.
-A good variety of women from young to cougars. I'd say that they have an emphasis more toward milfs and large breast(quite a few implants).
-Videos can be downloaded in multiple formats as a complete scene or in multiple sections.
-Navigation is user friendly with many different methods to find a certain scene or fetish.
-The surfing inside the site and download speed is very good to excellent.
-Regular updates(about 3 per day).
-The ability to see some of the upcoming updates.
-The price is amazing for all that you get. |
| Cons: |
-too many women with fake breast and a few with some scary sizes.
-They tend to use the same actress all the time.
-The stories are hit and miss with some of the premises not being to everyone's taste
-Some of the navigation highlights don't always match the content inside the scene.
-The comments attached to each scene could use a good moderator. I found the language used in some of them to be lacking in good manners. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been aware of this site for years but kept putting off joining. I don't know why I didn't join sooner. I was pleasantly pleased with just about everything that this network offers.
I really liked the little stories. There are some that are good and quite afew that are really bad, but not necessarily in the ses as much as the corny dialogue or storyline.
My major complain is all the fake breasts. I prefer small breast but I can enjoy women that have larger breast. It's just that some of the performers have near blimp sized implants.
The male performers seem to come from a small
pool of talent. That is problem if a particular
actor annoys you because the scene is ruined, regardless of how hot the woman is.
They offer HD videos to long term members with
6 months or more. I'm glad for those willing to take the offer but that's not me. Not too mention but HD can be a real downer on some of their performers. I suspect that HD makes your small imperfections much larger. If your main perfomers have breast implants with minor scars well HD can make those scars quite large. |
|
10-29-09 07:32pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
25
|
Brutal Dildos
(2)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+414 videos and they add a new one each week.
+All videos can be dowloaded in multiple formats like WMV and MP4 and resolution is at least 640x360.
+They started offering HD quality videos in 2010 so you can now download the 100 most recent ones in 1920x1080.
+They have 414 photosets and they can all be downloaded as a complete zip file. Resolution for the last 100 sets is 1200x800.
+They have a surprisingly wide variety of models.
+You get access to 8 other sites.
+Content for this site appears to be all exclusif. |
| Cons: |
-Resoution for 300 of their videos is at best 640x360.
-Resolution for 300 of their phototsets is 560x840.
-Although you get access to 9 other sites. Only 3 of them are still updating.
**Many of the toys are huge so less a con and more a warning for anyone looking for midcore style penetration.** |
| Bottom Line: |
*I got a special offer to join for 20$ so it was hard to pass up. It's not that 30$ is a high price to pay but the content is on the extreme side of things and I'm not always in the mood for that kind of porn.
*The most surprising thing about this site and some of the other in the network is that you don't expect all of their models to do such extreme penetration and I'm not just talking about vaginal either. They use some really big toys which is a plus for me but I have to be in the mood otherwise the content is too extreme and I don't enjoy it. The only sites that are still updating are brutal fisting and huge strapon lesbians. These sites share many of the same models so it's not unusual to see a model on all 3 sites. I'm also pretty sure that the content on the sites that are no longer updating is not exclusif.
*If you are in the mood for extreme penetration than this site and 2 of the other in the network should more than satisfy your needs but if you like midcore style penetration then stay away because you will really hate what you see.*
**I think they should really work on the preview sections because this would greatly help anyone visiting for the first time to see that they are still upodating and what you get for your money.** |
|
03-26-12 09:01am
Replies (0)
|
