| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
What's the old expression. And Alexander wept because there were no more worlds to conquer. I'm starting to weep because there is almost no more porn to be found and the one that I would love to find is no longer in circulation.
|
06-17-13 03:33pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I didn't mention it in my last post because I hope the trend is going to change but I'm finding that even my old faithful sites are making
less and less the kind of porn that I want to watch so even I may one day get to a point where I won't have any kind of porn that I want to see.
|
06-17-13 03:59am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
The money was always a bonus so that's not the main reason why I do so few reviews these days. The sad truth is that I'm finding less and less of the kind of porn I'd like to see getting made so I keep going back to the same sites that I have already reviewed.
|
06-16-13 06:17pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I picked PPV porn but I don't actually use that except sites from the net. The more important thing is that there is no mention of dvd's. Maybe I'm the only one who has a decent collection of porn dvd's.
|
06-14-13 04:55am
|
Reply
5
|
X-Art
(10)
|
Reply of
streamingeagle's Comment
I think your first big mistake was taking a one year membership. It's true that the prices on those is often quite amazing and there was a time when I would have recommended them but the porn industry is in such dire trouble that paying for a one year membership now is like playing Russian roulette with your money. The chances that this site goes under in the next year are slim but stranger things have happened. You should bought a one month membership first to test the site and see if it has any bugs that you find hard to overlook.
Hopefully those mistakes get taken care of soon.
|
06-12-13 06:17pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've never actually watched a live webcam show but I have seen a few minutes of a recorded one. The only part of a live show was the pre free stuff where I could hear the woman moaning that there weren't enough people signing up for her to bother doing one. In any case. Cam shows don't appeal to me. I'm not into solo only stuff, I want more than one camera angle, I want the camera to zoom in and out so that I can see more of the action, I want some decent resolution, I want decent lighting and frankly I can't afford the amounts of money the vast majority of cam girls want for their time.
|
06-12-13 03:37am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
I wish there was a choice for other but since there isn't then I picked normal clothes. That said. I like variety so differences are great.
|
06-08-13 06:11am
|
Reply
8
|
The Classic Porn
(2)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
I agree that the quality on a lot of their movies is not very good but this is one of the few sites that offers them for download. I'd also like to add that many of them are 20 years and older so it's no wonder that they haven't aged well.
|
06-07-13 06:15pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I don't know the origin but I think jberryl69 has the right etymology of the expression but Capn is also correct that it has grown over time to mean different things than it used to.
One of the reasons why that expression might be used with a girl getting r@ped or her losing her virginity is that she might get pregnant from these things and there was a time when unmarried women who had babies were considered pariahs and their children were considered bastards.
|
06-06-13 02:28pm
|
Reply
10
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
thaavi's Reply
The comment section is not where you should be posting this info but on your review. The people interested in the site probably won't read comments if there is a recent review.
|
06-04-13 06:41pm
|
Reply
11
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
thaavi's Reply
If you think that because TBP has done a review and offered technical info that you and almost everyone else who has done a review doesn't need to add anything then you have completely missed the point of PU and the people who post reviews.
Here's a list of things that you might want to consider.
1-TBP's review is already 4 months old so there could have been some changes since that review.
2-We all see things a little differently so it's important that a review have as much info from the reviewers point of view so that we can see the site through his or her eyes.
3-None of us would have had an issue if only one person had posted a less than decent review but there are have been 5 reviews in the last four days and only one had the decency to write an unbiased review.
4-Do you realise that 2 of the reviews had zero cons and the other 2 had lack of BTS content as the con. I sometimes have a hard time finding cons in some sites but I still try to add some because there is no such thing as a perfect site.
5-Almost everybody said that she is artistic and creative as a pro. That sounds nice but what does that mean? If you had at least written more info talking about the content then those words would have had some meaning.
|
06-03-13 06:42pm
|
Reply
12
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I like Jo and I also like Eve but ChaseGC's review gave me the info I needed to make an educated choice and her type of content is not going to be enough to satisfy me. I'd rather join a site that has both Jo and Eve videos but also other models and more importantly a little bit of variety. The only thing that seems to vary in her stuff is location and partner. I guess for a super fan or Jo that is enough but I would have wanted her to use toys in some of the videos.
Ah well. I'm sure some people are happy with her site and I really hope we stop seeing useless reviews of her site. There are now 5 reviews and only one is any good.
|
06-03-13 03:52pm
|
Reply
13
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I can't accuse them of the crime and I don't want to but we wouldn't be talking about this if it had been only one review. We got 4 new reviews of a site that had none and 3 of them were so bad that the info and score are not to be taken seriously.
At least the last review is dead on and that's the one I will use to make a decision.
|
06-02-13 06:21pm
|
Reply
14
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I checked your first review in 2007 of AW and the one you did in 2011 and they aren't comparable because they are like night and day. The original one had no data. There's nothing wrong per say but is that really a review or just a fan talking about his favorite site.
I would have been fine if one person had made a review of Jo's site and picked a score that was at least close to what TBP gave the site but you got 3 people in a row who scored the site at 95, 98 and 100 and none of them could actually say anything except that the content is artistic(what does that even mean?). There is now a 4th review but we finally see a score that makes sense and there is info that is important to someone who wants to make an educated choice.
I don't know if the reviews were planted by someone associated with the site but 4 reviews in a 3 day period of a site that had none looks suspicious.
|
06-02-13 12:05pm
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've done it a few times and I even suggested it to a couple of other people. I can't remember most of them but pricing was involved in one or more of my reports.
|
06-02-13 09:00am
|
Reply
16
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
None of the reviews are of any value because the reviewers are either trolling for traffic or simply can't get a clue that this is not how you do a review. In any case. Maybe someone(other than TBP) who can do a decent review will join her site and then we will actually know what the site is about. For now I'm out of here. I won't post any other comments.
|
06-01-13 05:46pm
|
Reply
17
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
I don't know but the really sad part here is that her site looks decent. Of course you wouldn't know it based on the 3 recent reviews because there is nothing in them to excite a possible fan in joining.
I think the opposite is likely to happen because some people like me will feel that a site with such high scores and no hard data to support them is either a fraud or not a very good site at all.
|
06-01-13 10:44am
|
Reply
18
|
Evil Angel
(10)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Reply
Obviously it won't let you join with the same card since the card has been declined. Did you by chance check with the bank to see if what EA is saying is true. I'm a current member of EA and I've never had one problem with them and this is at least my third time with them.
|
06-01-13 10:41am
|
Reply
19
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
Elmien's Reply
Tell you what. Take a look at the reviewers with the most reviews and see what their reviews have in common. Then look at all of the recent reviews for Jo's site and you will notice that they don't have any of the important stuff needed to make a good review. What you basically have right now are a bunch of fans fawning over a porn performer and who cannot remove their feelings from their reviews.
The people who might be interested in joining want to know what they will find inside the members area and not that Jo is a girl next door type. They want to know if she does solo, b/g and g/g. What quantity of each. They want to know video resolution and photo resolution.
Let me see if I can make this simple. They want facts first and then fawning.
|
06-01-13 10:38am
|
Reply
20
|
Teen Fidelity
(1)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
That is an excellent question but I don't think my answer will be as good but here goes. I don't think that there's a single site on the net today that's perfect and therefore none of them deserve a perfect score. Both porn fidelity and teen fidelity are very close but they are not there yet. I've ever given a site a 100. I gave Brazzer a 99% in large part because they offer so much porn that you are bound to find enough of what you like to warrant that score. If PF and TF ever release more scenes per week then I might give them a 99% and if those scenes are as good as the ones they do now then I might give them a 100%.
|
05-31-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I chose sometimes because I do it from time to time but I must confess that I didn't really understand the question.
|
05-31-13 03:54pm
|
Reply
22
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
All I'll say is that a high score with no supporting data except for the insane adulation of the reviewer is a sure way to make the review useless. Case in point the two reviews for I dream of Jo. Sorry but you lose me when you describe a 32 year old woman has having a girl next door look. Jo/Monika is still an amazing looking woman but she has not looked like a girl in a very long time.
This may be a great site but none of the most I'll even go so far as to say that I'm now a little more nervous about content because of the reviews.
|
05-31-13 03:51pm
|
Reply
23
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I checked the site out and I count 50 updates this year. That's 50 if you count videos and pic sets separately. Otherwise there have been only 25 updates this year. What I found interesting is that some of the new updates are actually from the future because they are dated Nov 2013. I think the webmaster should use that for promo because they are the only site that is able to release content ahead of it's being done.
I think Jo is a very attractive woman and I may one day join her site but it certainly won't be from any of the recent reviews or comments because these don't appear to be impartial and that in my opinion does not help the site but actually make me weary of joining.
|
05-31-13 03:40am
|
Reply
24
|
Girls For Old Men
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I don't doubt it. I once bought a full network access at something like 80 plus dollars and I didn't save a single scene from any of the sites. These days I would only try one of their trial memberships because I don't know if there is anything that I truly care to save for a rainy day.
|
05-29-13 06:23pm
|
Reply
25
|
Girls For Old Men
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I don't know if you are aware but ferro came up with a blog site where you can view the more recent updates. I often use it to see which sites might be worth joining based on the amount of recent updates.
|
05-29-13 06:04pm
|
