Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (367)  

Feedback:   All (2858)  |   Reviews (173)  |   Comments (35)  |   Replies (2650)

Other:   Replies Received (1279)  |   Trust Ratings (68)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 2650 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I got one when I was 18 and I don't necessarily regret it but not having it would not be a issue.

The moral of the story for me is don't get one because it's not going to add anything to your life
and I could have spent that 72$ on something more interesting


09-17-14  05:55pm

Reply
2
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

I could have picked the option all of the above if there had been one but in truth it is impossible for a model to no longer be fresh or too popular. us but anyone stumbling on her for the first time would probably be as thrilled as us when we first saw her.

There are plenty of active performers who I used to love watching but don't anymore because I own so many of their scenes that I don't really care to add more. I still keep track of their stuff in the hope that she will offer something worthwhile but most rarely do.


09-13-14  11:54am

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Rarely these days but there are so few new sites to join that I mostly join established ones. That's not to say that I'm not partially disappointed in their content but that's another subject.

09-09-14  05:30pm

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

The face is always the first thing I look at and than it's the body.

09-07-14  09:10am

Reply
5
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

The bigger they are. The more important it is for them to have a search option but it has to be a well functioning one. I'd rather there not be one than one that gives out the wrong info

09-05-14  05:55pm

Reply
6
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I used to say that I don't mind it but these days I prefer to see a condom because otherwise I know that one of the scenes I'm enjoying involved the transmission of an STI. In fact probably many of the scenes I watch have that same problem.

09-03-14  06:09pm

Reply
7
Visit Euro Pornstars

Euro Pornstars
(0)
Reply of jook's Reply

I can't be certain but my guess is that they still list it because it is still active and they offer a significant discount to TBP/PU members so although you did not like the site. Someone else might be satisfied with content that is 3 years and older. Especially if they aren't too picky about screen resolution which appear to be only 640x480 for the videos.

I highly recommend you take a look at many other sites listed on TBP/PU and you will notice that quite a few of them haven't updated in many years. Just look at my back and forth with the webmaster for busty buffy and you will see that their sites have old content and aren't updating anymore.

I joined the Claudia Marie site because of the TBP discount and do you know what my 10$ got me. Videos that can only be downloaded in 428x240. You can stream them in HD but I don't join a pay site that allows downloads to stream in HD but download in crappy resolution.


09-02-14  06:34pm

Reply
8
Visit Euro Pornstars

Euro Pornstars
(0)
Reply of jook's Comment

I'm sorry you got fooled and maybe there should be more warnings but I think you are partially to blame here. I think you did what most of us have done at least once in our life and went with your heart rather than your brain. You clearly noticed that the TBP review was three years old which should have been your first clue that something might be wrong but your second clue and in my opinion the more obvious one is that the site facts have not been updated in 2 years which means that the review is for all intense and purposes null and void as the site could be completely different. The third clue and you can be forgiven for not looking at it is that if you look at The bottom of the TBP page for this site. You will notice that Rabbit did a review this year and the site got a 58%. I rarely look at other review sites but this is a case where I would only because I prefer to have the most up to date info.

09-02-14  06:01pm

Reply
9
Visit Facial Abuse

Facial Abuse
(1)
Reply of pornpundit's Comment

The reason marcus gave seems logical but is it possible that they changed their name because they were having a harder time recruiting women to appear on their FA site because of their bad reputation with talent? Maybe they think that they can fool new girls in appearing on their new site since they won't equate the old FA with the new FF.

I would rather they went out of business but that's just me.


09-01-14  04:58pm

Reply
10
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The thing that most people don't realise is that there isn't anything quite like online porn. Where else can you get hundreds of hours of content for less than 30$? Most mainstream sites require a lot more money to get a lot less content and often most mainstream sites don't allow download unless you buy the individual movie/show and that gets expensive real fast.

09-01-14  09:34am

Reply
11
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Technically I own three since I have a PS3. One is set up on my 55" TV where I watch most of my movies (that's non-porn movies) and the other two are on my 46" TV. I can't be sure if dvd's look better when played on a BluRay but they sound a lot better and that adds a lot to the viewing experience.

I now own a decent quantity of BluRay movies as the price is now about the same as most dvd.


08-30-14  07:01am

Reply
12
Visit Busty Buffy

Busty Buffy
(0)
Reply of HeliosMedia ltd's Reply

You understand that any flame war between you and I is only going to hurt you guys because I know what I'm talking about but since you clearly want to play than let's go. Before I get going I would like to point out that I have been a member of some of your sites in the past so the following is not hearsay but info that can be verified from my review.

You guys own 14 sites and none of them has ever gotten a higher score than Little Caprice's 76.5 (I gave her a 79 scorer in 2011). That was from TBP's review in 2013 which listed her site has having 97 videos. Seeing as my review of 2 years prior listed her site has having 86 videos than you only managed to add 11 videos in 2 years.

Than there is Kiki18 which had 31 videos in 2011 and still has the same number today.

We add Pinky June to the mix. I can't say how many videos she had in 2011 but seeing as her last blog is 2 years old than I guess she is not doing a lot of shooting for you guys.

Kaira18 actually lost one video since 2011 because she now has 26 when she had 27 when I was a member.

The piece the resistance is the lovely Sabrina Blond which I clearly stated is no longer shooting porn because she was escorting in Europe based on a reply by Little caprice on her site. She had 32 videos in 2011 and she has 32 videos today.

Did I miss a memo where you guys offered a discount on your pretty expensive sites given that they are all showing old content and not updating anymore? What your attitude tells me is that you are crooks. You may not have set out to be crooks but you realized that it was possible to fool enough people into believing that the content you guys offer is worth the price you charge. It's not.


08-29-14  06:47pm

Reply
13
Visit Busty Buffy

Busty Buffy
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

I wish I had better news because Lucie is super hot but the site has many of the things that make me nervous. It's nice and crisp but no way of actually seeing what you get for your money. They do claim to have a lot of content but if you look at what is visually on the site than you notice that there really isn't all that much. I think the cherry on the sundae is the offer to join for a 1$. Why offer to join for a dollar if the content is so great and there are multiple updates on a weekly basis.

08-28-14  07:14pm

Reply
14
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I didn't pick hate it because it's not a word that I like to use for something as mundane as porn.

I understand why it still exist today but I don't like pixelated porn and that's why I almost never watch Japanese porn.


08-28-14  06:33pm

Reply
15
Visit Busty Buffy

Busty Buffy
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

It's up to you but I recommend you read the interview in my previous reply to the webmaster. If he lied about one thing than what's the likelihood that he isn't lying about the resty.

08-28-14  06:30pm

Reply
16
Visit Busty Buffy

Busty Buffy
(0)
Reply of pat362's Comment

You probably shouldn't have replied to my comment because all I did was say something without actually giving any proof to substantiate my comment but since you have replied then please read what Lucie said in a recent interview about your site.

http://www.boobsrealm.com/2014/08/22/int...y-sensation-of-2014/


08-28-14  06:29pm

Reply
17
Visit Sin Drive

Sin Drive
(0)
Reply of RustyJ's Reply

Thanks. I was really curious. I on the other hand am not remotely interested in 1080p porn so you can imagine what my feelings must be in regards to 4k. I don't think that there is a single piece of porn that can be improved if it is in HD and I think most actually look worse because of it.

08-25-14  01:28pm

Reply
18
Visit Sin Drive

Sin Drive
(0)
Reply of RustyJ's Comment

Are you saying that if you only have 1080p videos than that is no longer sufficient for your porn needs and you won't be satisfied with anything less than 4K?

08-24-14  06:07pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I think that no matter if you are a mostly video only site. The moment you offer pics you must also offer zip downloads.

08-24-14  06:03pm

Reply
20
Visit Porn Duty

Porn Duty
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment

I don't know if it's just me but I got a strong sense that this is old content and not just a year old but much older. The interface is crisp but it's still circa mid 2000.

08-22-14  03:49pm

Reply
21
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't mind it but most performers don't stimulate me.

08-20-14  03:44pm

Reply
22
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)
Reply of martinlongbow's Reply

There is recycling and than there is excessive recycling. I am a fan of Sarah or at least I was prior to her desire to show rosebuds in every one of her anal scenes but I don't need or want to see her do another EB scene. I think her first 8 were more than enough. In fact I think that five was already more than I needed.

That's not to say that I don't agree with your statement because I do believe it's getting harder to find women willing to go the extreme anal penetration route. In fact I would say that EB is already there now because some of the last performers to have appeared on EB have had only toys in their asses as opposed to fist.


08-20-14  03:42pm

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

Although I agree that 24 hrs is a reasonable time. I think 36 is more acceptable because these people also have to sleep and the problem may be one that requires more time than just a day. That said anyone going above 36 is not doing his or her job properly.

08-18-14  06:45pm

Reply
24
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)
Reply of williamj's Comment

Are you still having some issue because I just tried to download a video and I was getting about 1.6Mb of download speed.

08-16-14  12:04pm

Reply
25
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I said not at all but that is only because there is not any site that I actually care to stay for more than a month. I had a long term membership to Brazzer which got on me and this was a 2 year old membership and I visit the site a couple times a week and there is not a single video that I really want to download and none of the upcoming stuff is any better.

I wish there was at least one site that I could say I want to join long term but there is not.


08-16-14  12:01pm


Shown : 1-25 of 2650 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.04 seconds.