Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (365)  

Feedback:   All (2753)  |   Reviews (172)  |   Comments (30)  |   Replies (2551)

Other:   Replies Received (1237)  |   Trust Ratings (68)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 2551 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Anal Educator

Anal Educator
(0)
Reply of Freax Media Gro's Reply

Sorry for not having replied sooner. I never got your PM but I think I can offer tell you what I think is wrong with your site(s).

1-Changing the dates on content to make it appear as though it's new and not a couple of years old is a big problem because it makes you look dishonest right from the start. If you can't offer brand new content then simply say so.

2-Offering any membership longer than one month is not a good thing for someone who has already cheated his customers twice in the past few years.

3-Charging more than 20$ for what is essentially old content is just not a nice thing to do.

4-A banner which links to your join page claims 30 updates per month which is a blatant lie since gags girl has only 2 videos, pupil teens won't be online until April 23 (if then) and dildo and fisting links back to anal educator so you aren't really getting seven bonus sites.

My theory is that you suspected that almost no one was going to pay money to join no rest for the ass because you screwed too many past members so you came up with a new site which contains all of your old scenes with maybe some new ones and this was another quick cash and grab scam where you won't be updating with actual new content and charge customers a premium price.

If you think that anything I wrote is incorrect then please tell me where and offer proof to validate your claim.

4-


04-18-14  09:35am

Reply
2
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

I have never seen this so I can't comment.

04-18-14  08:54am

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I have never seen a model with an instrument so I can't say if I would or wouldn't.

04-16-14  05:59pm

Reply
4
N/A Reply of graymane's Reply

It didn't turn out so well for the guys in Westworld. Call me weird but sticking my dick in any machine just doesn't sounf very appealing or safe.

04-14-14  05:31pm

Reply
5
Visit Bree Olson

Bree Olson
(1)
Reply of marcdc1's Reply

Some of the women on this network used to be prolific performers but they are now all retired. The only ones that still shoot the odd scene are Allie, Aaliyah, Ashley, and Anissa.

04-14-14  05:29pm

Reply
6
Visit Wow Porn

Wow Porn
(1)
Reply of Pedrote's Comment

I don't know how honest any site is when it comes to making sure that your personal info remains personal. All I know I that I get tons of spam emails on a weekly basis so someone at some point sold my email to someone else and now it's out there. I don't care because if I wanted to change tat an all I would have to do is create an email address for just my porn and another for everything else.

04-13-14  09:31am

Reply
7
Visit Bree Olson

Bree Olson
(1)
Reply of marcdc1's Review

Bree has been retired for at least 2 years so any content on her site must be that old or older. In fact I believe most of the performers on the network are semi-retired to completely retired.

I think the fact that the entire network is available for 15$ is why I don't really mind that you are getting old content but I can't see too many people coming back for more since there won't be much.


04-13-14  09:21am

Reply
8
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I usually download in order of most recent to older.

04-12-14  10:09am

Reply
9
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

I thinks it's even more impressive when you consider the type of porn she has done in those 9 years. I think the only stuff that Amber hasn't done is stuff that is illegal to do.

04-12-14  10:08am

Reply
10
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

There are actually two different and yet accurate answers to this poll question. In the first place a performer's shelf life can be many decades long as proven by performers like Nina Hartley 30 years and Lisa Ann 20 years. There are a few more that are getting close to 10 years and many that are over 5 years. Of course there is the opposite of the spectrum which can be proven by choosing almost any performer that started doing porn in last 5 years. The average shelf life for almost every performer today is less than a year. It's to the point where if you blink then you will miss their blip on the porn radar.

04-10-14  05:55pm

Reply
11
Visit Anal Educator

Anal Educator
(0)
Reply of TheSquirrel's Reply

I hope not because if you join through no rest for the ass then you also get this one. I'm pretty sure you will get the entire network and I hope you don't regret it.

I know I'm not joining because Girgio's past business practices pissed me off so now I refuse to give him my money.


04-10-14  01:56pm

Reply
12
Visit Anal Educator

Anal Educator
(0)
Reply of TheSquirrel's Comment

I think Duke and probably anybody else associated with TBP and PU can be forgiven for any lack of current news on this site and any other associated with the No Rest For... network. Here is what I can tell you. Giorgio Grandi is the man responsible for all the content on the network and he posted on the EBI forum on April 5 that he would again start to update the network with new stuff and this site is now part of the network.

On the surface this sounds like great news and maybe it will but let say a few words about Giorgio for one minute. This is the man who in 2011 stopped updating his sites but never told anyone that he was doing that and certainly never stopped offering year long memberships to his customers. He sort of came back in 2012 with some new stuff and some sweet words that he was back but that was BS since the sites stopped updating only a couple of months after the announcement. Now he's saying that he's back and will update the network with some new content (were did I read that story before?) and if you are a newbie and visit his sites then you would believe that it's true because there is some content dated 2014. The first problem is that the dated is a complete lie since the content is a lot older and worse is stuff he already had released in years past but probably removed for just this kind of occasion.

It's your money and you can do what you like with it but don't come crying to me if you feel cheated and please do not buy a membership longer than one month because you will definitely regret it for at least 365 days.


04-09-14  06:29pm

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I once joined the 90$ Ferro network and I have not seen another site that is more expensive so my porn budget is as high as I'm willing to spend. That said. I find that any site that charges more than
30$ is overpriced.


04-09-14  10:52am

Reply
14
N/A Reply of roseman's Poll

This is a tough one to answer because I've got many years of experience surfing for porn and maybe more knowledge than most surfers and therefore I may know that a site is being dishonest while another person wouldn't and would think the site is great.

Trust is, after all, a two way street. If you are lying to me and I don't know than I will trust you until I hear otherwise.


04-06-14  07:32am

Reply
15
Visit 1 By Day

1 By Day
(0)
Reply of kanaka's Review

This should be in the comments section and not a review since I don't think you can post a review if you haven't actually been inside the site.

04-05-14  05:34pm

Reply
16
N/A Reply of Woodruff's Poll

I haven't but I see no point in joining a site that has only BJ scenes of any performer. I enjoy a BJ like the next guy but I need a lot more than that in my porn for me to be happy with the scene.

04-02-14  05:48pm

Reply
17
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I took the question to mean in my private life as opposed to on the net so I consider myself to be very social. If the question was in regards to any kind of social media like Twitter, Facebook or any other than the answer is the complete opposite because I refuse to use these platforms. I'm a member of 3 forums and I am a pretty active member of two of these and a partial one on the other.

03-31-14  05:22pm

Reply
18
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

I can't comment too much about the looks on the girls face because I simply haven't seen enough of any of their scenes to have a decent sample but these guys aren't trying to shoot porn where the girl is having a good time so it's probably next to impossible for the girls to fake it. I guess their formula works so why change it? I won't say anything else on their method of billing but their ticket based system is a guaranteed cash cow. I mean how can it be anything but that when a 30$ membership only gives you 35 tickets which will get you a maximum of 35 videos but only if you pick old content newly updated. I would say that 35 tickets gets you about 7 to maybe 9 scenes but that's it.

03-31-14  05:18pm

Reply
19
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

The main reasons why I wanted to join this site is because they hire all the really hot new Euro girls and they make them do some truly hardcore stuff. Their choice of models is amazing. Just look at Lucie Wilde: http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/luciewilde.html
for a good example. You would think that good looking girl having hardcore sex would be a great recipe for success and I suppose to some people it is but I've come to the conclusion that the stuff LP does is so bad that they prove that it's possible to screw up a great recipe.

The reason I've come to the above conclusion is that whenever I watch a preview (obviously a full scene is impossible since I got shafted) of any of their scenes then there are recurring themes that ruin the scene. Here is the list in no articular order.

1-Hot girl is made to look as skanky as possible.

2-White sofa, white wall, bright lights make all the scenes look like they were meant for some kind of documentary rather than porn.

3-The sex is mostly all circus porn so you get weird positions, pile driving penetration of the girls orifices and a general disregard in regard to the model.

I'm kind of glad that I didn't actually get to download anything because I would have had to delete it all from my drives sooner or later.


03-30-14  09:40am

Reply
20
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I picked thrilled but this is often an after the fact comment since I rarely follow softcore models.
I keep track of new models so I'm usually aware of some of them prior to them making the jump to HC but it's not like I was following their softcore career and than saw that they were doing HC.

I suspect that most people who enjoy softcore feel a little(if not a lot) cheated when they see one of their favorite go to the dark side of the force.


03-29-14  09:40am

Reply
21
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I've only had few exchanges with webmasters but a bad attitude guarantees that I will never rejoin a site that I might have if he hadn't been a dick.

03-27-14  05:40pm

Reply
22
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(10)
Reply of Abel Semen's Reply

I never said that people didn't like them but only that facials can't be considered glamorous. The act of ejaculating on a girls face is not one that I would call respectful and it's certainly not something you do to a person you adore. I equal facials with spitting in the face and no one likes to get spit in the face. I don't care what you have read or heard from porn performers in regards to cum shot to the face but none of them enjoy getting sperm all over their face and they certainly don't like it in their eyes. It's just that they know that a certain percentage of fans like yourself like them and they try to sell the fantasy. That's why glamour sites can't do facials because facials never equal glamorous no matter how good the camera operator is.

You'll have to give me the names of the movies where you saw post facial kissing between the man and the woman because I can't think of one where I have seen it. That's not to say they don't exist but strangely enough guys don't want to eat their own sperm.


03-25-14  06:36pm

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No and why would you?

03-25-14  06:19pm

Reply
24
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I picked that I'm smarter but a large part of that is because I'm older and have accumulated a lot more info than many other surfers.

03-23-14  07:42am

Reply
25
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of Schirm's Reply

The bulk of the content on VB and VideosZ is many years old and it's not getting any younger. The quality of the print the sites used was not necessarily the best and they never bothered to remaster them so the final product is often of passable video quality. Their problem is compounded by the fact that so many studios have died in the last 5 years that it's getting harder and harder for them to find new material to update on a daily basis. In fact the bulk of the new stuff is actually content taken from porn sites as opposed to actual porn studios. The rest is a mixture or older titles and content from the few remaining active studios but that last one now means that it's not exclusive to VB and/or VideosZ.

That doesn't mean that both sites aren't worth joining because they are if for no other reason than they have such a huge library of content that it's well worth a month long membership. Likely longer if you want o truly find everything that you want.

The bulk of the content on both sites is best appreciated if the video resolution is 640x480. I wish I could say the newer stuff can be downloaded and viewed in 720p or 1080p but stated above that both sites still update with older content so no way of telling you which new movie is actually recent and which one isn't without seeing their library.


03-23-14  07:41am


Shown : 1-25 of 2551 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.02 seconds.