Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Teens Analyzed

Teens Analyzed (0)

pat362 (375) 02-11-13  06:54pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +You get access to about 19 sites.
+A large percentage of the content is exclusif.
+You can downoad the videos in WMV and MP4.
+They offer each video in HD 1920x1080.
+Most of the videos have an accompanying photoset which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution appeas to be about 1200 x 800 fo most pics.
+Each scene is tagged with some key words so it's possiible to search using those one or more of those keywords.
Cons: -Each page on the site is loaded with third party advertising.
-The site isn't really updating all that often anymore.
-A large part of the content is leased material which is available on many other sites.
-They mention access to first anal date but if you try the site then you are sent back to teens analyzed because they used all the content on first anal date to fill this site.
-They have a general search system but I tried using different keywords or names of performers and the results were bad to awful.
Bottom Line: *The reason why I joined this site is because my membership gave me access to a bunch of sites that I've had my eye on for a few years now and there was no way I could pass up the opportunity to try them. Of course what often happens is that anticipation is never really satisfied and this time was no different. The vast majority of the sites have either badly shot, badly lit or downright crappy porn. There is an abundant amount of leased material aas well. Some of the sites don't have all that much content and they haven't actually updated in years.

*Now it's not all bad because I did find a few videos that were worth keeping and maybe someone else who is maybe less picky can find stuff that they want but be forwarned that expectation may need to be lowered.

*It's hard to say who will be happy with the content on this site or the other ones because it's quite possible that you already have some of their scenes from similar sites out there. I think that if you aren't too picky and prefer a certain amateur feel to your porn then you might find some nice gems here.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


elephant (67) Nice review Pat

Yeah some sites you think, looks kinda good, you save it and when you do eventually join often never quite what you had hoped it would be or really low res and no updates, loads of sites like still taking peoples money but never update.

02-12-13  01:14am

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #1 - elephant :

The good news is that I have now joined every Eastern European anal themed site at least once so I know which sites are worth joining again and which are to be avoided. Another good news is that I didn't have to spend as much money as I would have had to if Teens Analyzed didn't exist. I don't think any of the sites offered with my membership were ever less than 29$ each and that meant I would have spent over 100$ to join the ones I was interested in.
02-12-13  03:36am

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) I just joined this network today, because, like you, I have been interested in a few sites in the network, and this seemed like a cheap way to get access. Since I just joined today, I have to get used to navigation at these sites. I click on a thumbnail, and instead of loading a video I want to see, I am re-directed to a site that I can sign up for. You weren't kidding when you wrote that: -Each page on the site is loaded with third party advertising.

I signed up through the Young Sex Parties site, but it's all part of the same network, I assume.

I think your description of the network/site is very accurate, from what I've seen so far. I've only watched 2 videos, but they both have a very amateur feel to them.

But I do believe there are more professionally shots videos at this network, because I've seen some of them in the past.

Do any of these sites have a simple model listing with nice-sized thumbnails to show what the models look like?

02-16-13  04:07pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone :

The content often feels amateurish but the girls are all pros because I recognized almost all of them. of course the names they have here are not the same as they are known under but that is way too common with Eastern European porn sites.
02-16-13  06:41pm

Reply To Message


joekramer08 (12) REPLY TO #4 - pat362 :

I've been wanting to join this network for a while and I probably will in the next month or so. I like the look of their scenes. The lighting is kind of amateurish, but I like how they shoot their scenes zoomed out to show off the girl's body. I can get over an amateurish look if the scene does a good job of showing me the girl.
02-18-13  04:55pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #5 - joekramer08 :

Be advised that if you have been a member of teen mega world then you may find that they share part of the same content.
02-18-13  05:47pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.