Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings (4)

Active
92
pat362 (367) 10-25-12  06:29pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Over 7500 scenes to chose from.
+They have an excellent mix of North American, South American and European performers.
+They have over 500 interacial scenes and over 1100 lesbian scenes.
+They do an excellent job of tagging all their scenes so it's easy to search using keywords.
+All the videos from 2006 to now can be dowloaded in WMV and MP4 and the resolution is at least 768x432.
+All videos starting in late 2010 are now also available in MP4 1080p HD.
+They update with about 10 new videos per week and all content is dated
+The main pages aren't clutered with a lot of third party advertising.
Cons: -The most annoying thing about this site is that you only see the performers full name on the main page. So if you do a search by keyword then all you see is the models first name which isn't always correctly spelled.
-They do a lot of scenario porn but a lot of it is not as well done as it I'd like it to be.
-The content from sometime in 2004 and before is only available in multiple clips.
-The resolution for most of the videos may be 768x432 but the quality for the videos made from 2008 and before is average at best.
-Their preview section is one of the worst one for this type of site.
Bottom Line: **This is the top rated reality porn site and I can see why it is. They try to hit almost every type of porn and they to do a pretty decent job with most of them. They have a few faults but these are rather minor and are probably not much of an issue for most people.

*If you have been a member of Naughty America, Mofos, Brazzer or bangbros than you know what to expect since tese guys offer about the same type of content. The most obvious difference seems to be in the selection of models. Most sites prefer to stick with models from one or two Countries but these guys try to cover the whole world. They have over 900 scenes with European models, 350 scenes with Brazilian models and so many more with American models of different nationality. The only ethnic group not really represented are Asians.

*Their choice of models is a slight problem for me because I'm not generally a fan of Brazilain models or Brazilian porn so that's 350 less porn scene for me. Then there are the 900 Europeans scenes. They are for the most part good but I've been a member of so many great European sites that I already have many similar scenes starring these same girls so that means that I didn't really bother downloading most of their videos.

*The only thing that I wouldn't mind seeing is an improvement in the acting for the scenario driven scenes. The other sites do a much better job. The other improvment is in making sure that the models full name is visble on every screen so that you don't have to check out a different page to see if it's the correct model.

**If you have tried the other sites like this one then you have to try this one because there is so much content that you are bound to get your money's worth.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (11)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Monahan (40) I'm good with all of Pat's observations, especially the identification issues and the low quality of the older stuff. Those two aspects are what makes me score this site at 85 (I reserve 90+ for superb sites with no significant shortcomings.

Identification - What's the problem with the site here? There's no legitimate reason these people can't maintain a consistent naming convention and make it easy on those of us who pay the bills to find what we want when we want. My only conclusion is pure laziness.

Older stuff - At least the site could tie the multiple clips together for Pete's sake. It isn't that hard to do. Then consider doing what Bang Bros has been doing; remastering the really good stuff in the archives.

I have one additional significant beef with this site; they don't do a decent job supporting Fire Fox Mozilla browsers. While a member I was forced to switch over to IE to access the site, a real pain in the ass because my download manager is a Fire Fox add-in.

Three significant issues (with a few minor ones at well) make this a low 80's for me.

10-26-12  08:11am

Reply To Message

2

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #1 - Monahan :

I was surprise about the name thing. I think you are right and they are just too lazy to fix it. Although it's true that the older stuff is not very good. I can't give them a score below 90 plus because they have so much content that you do get your money's worth.
It would be nice if they trie to remaster their older stuff like Bangbros and Dogfart do but we have already established that they are lazy so doing that would really be too much work.

10-26-12  01:52pm

Reply To Message

3

elephant (65) Nice review Pat as usual, I always like reading your views and reviews.
I will join this site again soon as some of the latest we live together updates look really up there with the best lesbian porn being made today, yeah like less tats but we know that's never gonna happen lol.

Also impressed with the Mom Bangs Teens series looks awesome, since watching a few older woman and younger woman have sex with a guy on the sweetsinner site and it's now my fav niche, some of these look nice.

Milf next door, pure 18 and euro sex parties are Okish too but none of the other interest me too much to be honest, I will join though soon, probs a Christmas join with elegant angel.

10-28-12  05:56am

Reply To Message

4

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #3 - elephant :

It's a very good network of sites to join and the price is excellent.

Here is some info for you.

Moms Bang Teens is a nice addition since they have only been online since January. The downside is that they don't update on a regular basis so you have some months where there are 2-4 new scenes and then you have months where there are only 1. At least you have 31 scenes at the moment.

Milf Next Door suffers from low updating. They only have 6 scenes this year and 7 for last year. Basically it all went to hell in 2009 because that's when you saw a significant reduction in their upates.

10-28-12  09:00am

Reply To Message

5

elephant (65) REPLY TO #4 - pat362 :

Cheers for the extra info.

Yeah I guess this is a problem these big sites have when they have so many sub sites they tend to get updated less on some of the sites and it's a shame but some are more filler sites I guess. Yeah 31 scenes isn't too bad, I'm quite picky though, the older woman has to be attractive, that's when it becomes slightly harder to find real gems, I also like them to be of a difference in age, sometimes you get scenes like say older and younger and they look hardly any different. Still its great when you find a perfect pairing. The Zoe Kush and Ray Veness one looks out of this world, I really like Ray Veness she is one of them great dirty talkers I love.

I wish a site would do this and this only and loads of updates a week, I'd join in a shot, I've got so many b/g sex sometimes it does become predictable and I'm finding more and more these days I like the group scenes better more though the GG/M than G/MM.

10-28-12  09:51am

Reply To Message

6

messmer (137) REPLY TO #4 - pat362 :

Sorry for butting in, Pat, but how many scenes in "Moms Bang Teens" would you say contain enhanced breasts? This is a niche I like very much but, as you know, bolt-ons turn me off ..COMPLETELY!
10-28-12  12:45pm

Reply To Message

7

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #6 - messmer :

I don't know if they took people like you into consideration when they filmed the scenes but many of milf in the scene seem to always keep their tops on or they shoot in such a way that it's hard to be certain whether they have implants or not. I'm pretty sure that at least 4 to maybe 6 of them have natural breast as I'm also sure that at least 9 have implants. The last 4 or so are uncertain but I tend to lean in the direction of implants.
10-28-12  05:57pm

Reply To Message

8

messmer (137) REPLY TO #7 - pat362 :

Thanks, Pat. I was hoping the percentage of natural vs. enhanced was better at Reality Kings. Somebody must have told all The MILFs some time ago: either have surgery or we can't use you.
10-28-12  06:09pm

Reply To Message

9

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #8 - messmer :

I'm less inclined to think that they were told to do that then that they chose on their own. As women age so does their body and breats seem to be of particular interest to women. Actually they are of interest to men as well.

I'm far more bafflked when a 19 years old gets huge implants because she definetely can't use age as the reason.

10-28-12  06:30pm

Reply To Message

10

messmer (137) REPLY TO #9 - pat362 :

Ah, as Shakespeare would say, there's the rub! You see I love breasts that sag and droop a bit with age. I love women who look their age and who don't try to imitate Barbies. To me a woman in her forties or fifties, with firm breasts, is an anachronism. Those firm cones just don't belong!!! :-)
10-28-12  06:50pm

Reply To Message

11

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #10 - messmer :

I still prefer natural to implants so I'd take the droopping ones if the women chose to stay natural but I can understand the reasoning for why they do it and accept that these older women often have huge mellons on their chest. At least they have the the wear and tear of time but a 20 years old with implants is mind boggling...Not really but that's for another discussion.
10-29-12  04:15pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.