Nice little review. Having checked the tour, I agree, it does seem a little bit of 'same old same old', much as I like these veteran models, and hope to go on enjoying them as they mature further (assuming they don't all retire soon, which many probably will).
I'm not really a 'fisting fan' as such, but am definitely a fan of Euro babes, lesbian and solo, who unlike their American counterparts, seem to be genuinely enjoying having dirty sex, rather than just acting at it and speaking corny lines ('just like that', 'right there', 'look at that' etc etc etc). This site appears to offer more exclusive material of European porno babes, and if that happens to include fisting, that's fine by me too. I think I'll check it out.
I answered 'by model', but the operative word in the question, is 'new'.
The first time I become a member, I see what's on offer from my favourite models, and browse around for the most beautiful models.
But after a short while I will just grab everything that is available on the site, movie and picture, and generally do this in date order, starting from the oldest up to the most recent, wanking myself stupid as I go.
I was initially attracted to this site by the many sexy ass gaping images in the tour section. I like to see gapes and women just flaunting their assholes, but I hate to see men in porn, so this mainly-solo site looked promising.
But none of the sets are even zipped! Come on! Zipping the sets is pure textbook! To not do this is just plain negligence.
Plus, the full-size photo previews show the low-res of the pics too.
Plus, according to TBP and other users, you can't even access all the pics - it's on some kind of rotational system. How on earth TBP still saw fit to rate this site in the 70s based on all this, I'll never know.
Actually, good point Messmer. We have referred to it as an ass site because that is how it is promoted (i.e. the 'crack' refers to the ass crack, not the pussy).
But you're right - a great many videos and photo sets aren't centred around the ass at all. For people (like me) who really appreciate proper girly back door action, and with no men featured, I recommend Lez Cuties a lot higher than this site. :)
Very useful review man, thanks. The comments about the large file sizes and gynaecological close-ups really struck a chord, as I had exactly the same problem with In The Crack.com - it ceases to be sexy when it gets so close up and internal, and becomes more like a biology lesson. And the file sizes are massive.
I actually gave In The Crack a good review originally as it was so different, but it became boring very fast, and I'm guessing Give Me Pink will be the same, so I will avoid it and save my time and money.
OK, keep your hair on! I wasn't taking a serious shot at you. I knew exactly what your original comment meant, and was basically saying "Yes, obviously that's the case" - because, to be blunt, you were stating the obvious. Take a chill pill!
I recently took my PC in for a major upgrade (new motherboard and processor). And although I keep all my porn on external drives now, I still have all my firefox bookmarks saved on my main system drive - and there are a few links to various porn sites, (e.g. this site, a lesbian porn torrent site, 21 Sextury's Porn For All that I'm currently signed up to) so the guys in the shop knew very well what my porn tastes were.
And that's fine - it's not illegal, I'll probably never see those guys again (so I don't have to be embarrassed), and I also know in reality they will have seen it a million times before on PCs that get taken in to the shop, given that porn is far and away the number one biggest viewing activity on the internet.
The only people that need to worry are the sickos like Garry Glitter (famous in the UK - google the name). Not only is he a paedophile who kept millions of images of kids on his PC, but he was also stupid enough (luckily for society) to take it in for repair with those images on an internal drive, hence his arrest and incarceration.
The rest of us who enjoy consensual legal porn, have nothing to hide.
Hi Elephant, just seen your comment, been away for a while (using a girl on girl torrent site!)
Yeah, I completely agree. There's something cold and soulless about using dildos. It's so much hotter to see flesh on flesh. S.E. went through a crap period where the girls just weren't up to standard, but now there are loads of fantastic threesomes and foursomes starring Eufrat (for example) with lots of anilingus, and some tribbing too. The occasional turkey still gets through, but there's definitely enough A-One stuff to justify getting your annual update. :)
Well, you're not the only one my friend. I had to deal with some seriously childish arguments from the webmaster of 1 by Day after I gave some constructive criticism that he couldn't handle (even accused me of being a plant from another porn site, because of course no one could possibly genuinely dislike his site) - but happily I got LOTS of support from fellow PUs (even those that disagreed with my points) and he showed himself up for the petty little man he was.
I agree - we can make a difference!
Just been reading through your unpleasant argument with asmith12 - let me add my support to your side! You gave your own opinion, based on verifiable facts, and so don't deserve to be 'mistrusted' based on that!
I found asmith's arguments ludicrous - comparing unlimited downloading to 'filling up a plate with food, then having to leave it to be thrown away'. Jeez, talk about tenuous. Downloads aren't perishables! They are there to be saved and accessed at ones leisure!
I went for 'No I'm faithful' also. My missus is such a great girl, I have no desire whatsoever to do that to her, much as I might be tempted. I know I would feel too guilty to be the same with her afterwards.
Having said that, she has no idea I watch porn, so I already feel guilty enough about that (you never know how a woman will react if she discovers something like that) - but my love of lesbian porn predates our relationship by many years and I ain't about to give it up now. But as for actually fucking another girl - nah, that's a whole other ballpark and I wouldn't do that.
And like Jay G said - I agree, porn is actually better than promiscuity. It's physically safer (no STDs) it's cheaper, and in my case the women in porn are hotter and nastier than anything I would ever find in real life! Having said all of that - I'm reminded of the phrase: chance would be a fine thing! Easy to be moralistic about gluttony when your pantry's bare!
In moderation though! I read of a Chinese guy (I think it was) who was in therapy for sex addiction. He was wanking something like 10 times a day! That guy must've been in pain man! But he couldn't stop himself!
OK, that's an extreme, but sometimes I give myself a break from daily porn and 'self abuse' (!) cos too much can definitely sap your energy.
Yeah - sometimes a site get's plugged following a radio interview. That's how I got onto the likes of iceagenow and climateaudit, from hearing the people who run them in interviews that inspired me to look further.
I don't believe any of them would really. One thing (of many) that I really respect about American people, is their awareness of the importance of freedom, and the real value of it.
(I should mention that most Americans are blissfully unaware of the undemocratic political processes going on now, to join in political union with Canada and Central America, much like the EU - there will be no vote on this when it eventually happens, just as with the EU).
But to get back on topic - I reckon to ban porn (by and for consenting adults) would be unconstitutional, and none of that rubbishy selection of politicians (just as bad as ours) would risk the controversy of attempting to ban it. They'll stick to safer ground, like propagating 'human induced global warming' bullshit (that most people seem to believe in, despite the science saying it's bullshit).
So, er, in short I say: none of 'em.
Sandra Shine is one of my all time favourite porn stars.
She's sexy, with a beautiful face, and a gorgeous curvaceous body. She always seems to engage in sex scenes with a genuine passion for what she's doing. There's never any sense that she's faking, she has an unmistakable lust for female flesh. Along with Sandy and Peaches, there are not too many girls you can say that about.
I occasionally have a look at her site's promotional pages, but there never seems to be enough content to tempt me to hand over my money. The video trailers look very hot, but there are only a pitiful 16 trailers on there. This suggests there are only 16 decent movies on the whole site. Compare this with Sandy's site, which has literally several hundred movies, every one available in the gallery to be browsed by visitors.
One thing I've done before - and I'm sure many of you out there have done this too - is pretend I want to cancel in order to get another month much cheaper.
Many sites, if you go to cancel and select "no problem, just moving on" they will then try and bribe you to stay for a very cheap fee.
It's not often I do this though. Usually I am happy to leave after one month because I have downloaded all the content and it's not worth staying, even for a cheap fee. But a couple of times I haven't had a chance to get all the content, so I pretended to want to cancel, and got the 2nd month much cheaper (about $10).
Most. Undoubtedly. But I'm not going to present my opinions as some pseudo-scientific analysis with percentages and 'margins of error'.
This is because (and this is FACT) 83.6% of such analyses are not accurate. That's with a margin of error of 4.
But seriously, I reckon that for every top class site like Club Sandy (IMO of course) or 1 By Day (which I think is crap, but is obviously very popular so must have something good that I'm missing) there are a dozen or so absolutely shit sites that exist only to rip off their customers. You can spot most of them a mile off if you have any experience, but most of us only gained that experience by being ripped off in our green days.
I went for 'extremely important' as it's the first thing I look at, and generally determines if I'm likely to look any further.
I do put this in the context of the number of votes though. If the score is only in the 70s, but it has 3 reviews in the 90s and one extremely low score, I will take that low one with a pinch of salt. Ditto the other way round (one high score, several low scores).
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.