Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Davit (46)  

Feedback:   All (220)  |   Reviews (25)  |   Comments (8)  |   Replies (187)

Other:   Replies Received (134)  |   Trust Ratings (29)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 134 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit In The Crack

In The Crack
(1)
REPLY TO #15 from messmer: (Davit's Reply)

And so do you and others have a good point. If the site itself promotes the "crack" in its name then, that's what it has to be, an ass site. I went by the material I downloaded and by the assumption that a pussy can be a crack too. :-)

09-14-08  09:27am

Reply
2
Visit In The Crack

In The Crack
(1)
REPLY TO #13 from messmer: (Davit's Reply)

Davit wrote:

"It also annoys me to read 'We must warn you that the lighting isn't very good/the orgasm looks fake/the girl has no passion' or whatever. If it's that bad (and generally when the movie has a warning like this it *is* bad) then why bother putting the movie up there? Happily, these are still in a very small minority."

There are negative comments like that about the latest model (#187 in their catalog): that her skin isn't as smooth as that of others and that she's not as passionate about the shoot as she could be. Not one of the best videos, etc. etc. To me, that's a slap in the face of the model and makes me wonder what she did to cheese off the videographer / webmaster! Why not let us make up our minds on what's attractive and what isn't. I hate to see models insulted like that and won't resubscribe despite the high praise I gave the site in my remarks.


09-13-08  01:32pm

Reply
3
Visit In The Crack

In The Crack
(1)
Reply of Davit's Review from messmer:

Good review, Davit. I agree with most of what you wrote. The only thing I don't understand is that not only you but other reviewers as well refer to this site as an "ass site." I've downloaded tons of video segments since subscribing and very few contain pure "ass" material.

Could it be it's because I might be using the "search" button more frequently than others? It gives you clear choices there. I steer clear of "ass" because it's not my thing and still have loads of videos to pick from. I'm starting to develop a panty stuffing fetish! :-) One other point, when it comes to some of the models being too detached, there's plenty of evidence in the close-up pussy shots that not all are left indifferent!


09-11-08  08:02am

Reply
4
Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica
(0)
REPLY TO #7 from elephant: (Davit's Reply)

Yeah Davit, sorry this reply is so late, I've too been away and just getting through what porn I already have, I have to agree with you as been a member too just lately , had to, usually just once a year but heard it had improved and had some mix of better stuff, love the new hot girls like Channelle, Nicole, Bethany and Kelsey they are very hot girls and yeah it needs more anal, love the fact now you can see if a movie has anal beforehand. Only thing the site now needs is more older/younger lesbians, I still love that movie Kimberly, Nicole & Anna where they do anal too at the end, awesome vid. Theres nothing sweeter than an older woman getting sucked and licked by two younger women.

less toys , no boys, more joys

take care.

ps have you seen any of the boundheat.com stuff, soft stuff but does look tempting, wish you could subscribe and get all the movies. theres plenty older/younger their and all hotties.


08-16-08  01:34pm

Reply
5
N/A REPLY TO #9 from MargulisAZ: (Davit's Reply)

What's with this comment Davit? I was responding to indybt30 commenting on the idea of them trying to make money off the trials. Why don't you leave your sarcasm at the door and add something to the discussion instead?

08-10-08  11:30am

Reply
6
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(4)
REPLY TO #6 from BostonPJR: (Davit's Reply)

Agreed. Although I don't know about "artificially high" seems like on the sites I like, I am consistently 5 points higher than TBPs reviewer. And I'm sure not getting any kickbacks.

07-26-08  11:15am

Reply
7
Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from elephant: (Davit's Reply)

Great to hear the site is back on track, I'm so glad, I usually join once a year at christmas time and although I loved it last time still I did think it lacked in some scenes and too much dildo use, I hate dildo use, just so boring. Good to know theres some more analingus about to. Yeah I love the orgy scenes but they need to do more like the old orgy scenes, the foursome with simone, elaine, angelique and could be monique (I can't remember her name) but it was a great foursome on sofas and they all joined in on one girl, giving her pleasure, all gorgeous too, still my fav vid.

07-03-08  06:28am

Reply
8
Visit Ultimate Surrender

Ultimate Surrender
(1)
REPLY TO #15 from exotics4me: (Davit's Reply)

Hey Davit,

Yeah, that was a pretty ugly argument that I finally just gave up on. I don't know what was going on with asmith at that time, he seems to be a good member these days. I don't know if it was one of those moments where he tried to make himself better known by refuting an established member or what. Either way, his view never changed towards my reviews, even after I wrote the follow-up and gave the points back since the DL limit was lifted on Ultimate Surrender.

I do notice that our comments are read on here by sites. Less than a month after my review of US, they lifted the DL limit and less than a week after my comment on Viv Thomas's video site not letting Teen Dreams members download his content as bonus content, but only letting them stream it, he has gone back and started letting the Teen Dreams members download his movies, though they are only 750 bitrate, compared to 2000 on his site.

Thanks for the support on this one!


06-22-08  03:54am

Reply
9
N/A REPLY TO #11 from mr smut: (Davit's Reply)

:o) the other hand is most impressive. Masturbation is healthy none of us doubts that!

Behold ... I'm getting blind ...


06-07-08  06:36pm

Reply
10
Visit Sandra Shine Live

Sandra Shine Live
(0)
Reply of Davit's Comment from exotics4me:

By my last count, Sandra's site had over 60 movies on it. When I was on it last year, about 11 months ago from my review, there was 20, so they have been updating pretty regularly. It is a great site if you are a huge Sandra fan, but even then, one month is all you need.

05-27-08  03:42pm

Reply
11
N/A REPLY TO #20 from asmith12: (Davit's Reply)

> This is because (and this is FACT) 83.6% of such analyses are not
> accurate. That's with a margin of error of 4.
Sure. But my analysis doesn't fall within these 83.6%. Undoubtedly. :-)


05-16-08  05:01am

Reply
12
Visit Club Dorothy Black

Club Dorothy Black
(0)
Reply of Davit's Review from matyko:

Hello Davit,

Sorry for the late reply, but we are buried in the work - as always :)

Your review is very rich in details, Thumbs Up!

This time I'll react just for the negs:

Updates: we are thinking of making the smaller sites into a network. We know about the update problems, but Dorothy is busy with other projects, its hard to book her these days.

Bad content: we definitely need to select and sort out the LQ content... task scheduled!

DL manager support: contacted our coder about this; he replied: with "Free Download Manager" it works flawlessly on all our sites.

Login problems: This is not the first review/comment mentioning this problem. Task scheduled, I will report you on changes.

Small archive: it can be improved by making the network mentioned above...

Old content: we are thinking of making an exclusive archive and a separate non-exclusive archive for all the sites. This could solve the disappointing problem.

I am very impressed by the comment on our support. I know that I made promises in the name of the company which were never realized. I am doing my best to make a pressure on the leaders, because I am not the one who is making the decisions, most of the time I am just transmitting information between members and the head of the company.

Thank you again for taking the time to make your very well detailed review!

Have a Nice Sunny Day :)


05-09-08  03:54am

Reply
13
N/A REPLY TO #15 from Drooler: (Davit's Reply)

Some things are going to be kept secret .. we'll never know for sure. Remember, we're the ones who have to reveal all, in order to pass the qualifying interviews and the numerous other "tests."

04-15-08  09:22pm

Reply
14
N/A REPLY TO #10 from Drooler: (Davit's Reply)

A bowl of Frosties! I wonder if I can get my mitts on a big box of Frosties here on the other side of the pond. Thanks for the tip!

04-15-08  05:01pm

Reply
15
Visit Lesbians From India

Lesbians From India
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from bbiillyy: (Davit's Reply)

yes is it just you. Can you tell me how well you know indians :) mother tongue of india is Hindi / Sanskrit not ENGLISH

04-13-08  11:56am

Reply
16
Visit Babelicious

Babelicious
(0)
Reply of Davit's Comment from Monahan:

I agree about natural sounds being audible. If there are no natural sounds, I'm fine with a bird chirping in the background or something like that just to make sure my speakers are operative.

I like music where the girl is dancing in the video but the music must be part of the content and not just dubbed in. Out of synch music is totally not good.


04-03-08  11:36am

Reply
17
N/A REPLY TO #21 from badandy400: (Davit's Reply)

I would have to say that quality is very important. I know that was not the pole question, but it is out of the bag now so we might as well consider it because it is a valid point. For $30 a month on a new site there better be some great looking stuff. After all they did not have a update deadlines to meet before the site would launch so they should have plenty of time to plan the scenes and get the quality that is becoming standard. A new site should not even consider doing anything that is not shot in HD.

03-19-08  09:02pm

Reply
18
N/A REPLY TO #13 from jd1961: (Davit's Reply)

I agree, it does seem degrading, unless it's spontaneous with the girl doing it. But doing it for shock value alone seems forced. Of course, nowadays these girls will do anything for money.

03-13-08  04:31am

Reply
19
Visit Only Cuties

Only Cuties
(0)
Reply of Davit's Review from visor:

Agree totally. They're pretty, but it ends up being sort of antiseptic. Could do with more variety (eg more m/f, some hairy pussies, some anal etc)

03-12-08  10:06am

Reply
20
N/A REPLY TO #39 from messmer: (Davit's Reply)

Apologies, I meant to answer days ago but didn't get around to it until now. Thanks for the tip. Sapphic Erotica sounds great. Does it have any solo photo/video sets or does it stick strictly to its niche. I like a mixture of both. I suppose I could have gone to the site to find out for myself but am really rushed these days. F/F and F/solo, all of it as natural as possible, without the exaggerated yelps and screams of "Oh YESSS!" "Oh God!!" of imitation orgasms, that's my ideal site. AND without enhanced breasts, please. Should have added that to tattoos and piercings as a big turn-off. I could kill the first guy who told his girlfriend, wife that she would look good with inflated breasts. Who wants to play with bags of silicone? :-)

03-11-08  11:55am

Reply
21
N/A REPLY TO #3 from RagingBuddhist: (Davit's Reply)

Sure you don't mean 1958? : - )

03-08-08  11:58am

Reply
22
Visit In The Crack

In The Crack
(1)
REPLY TO #11 from Drooler: (Davit's Reply)

Yes, I agree that the repeated lines, whether they're hyperbole or hypoperbole (?), can get a bit tiresome. Guess I'm so jaded that I just gloss over them.

And I also prune down the sets when things get to being too much the same, or too pre-med, or of course when the girl has a weird or pissy look on her face. That last one doesn't happen often at The Crack, fortunately. (Twistys is another site that suffers from excessive similitude in photosets.)

Well, there's hardly ever a set that I don't toss pics from, wherever it comes from. Blurriness, what-were-they-thinking croppings, big-ass babe covered by bigger-ass watermark, etc. Those are directed to the bin.


03-08-08  11:14am

Reply
23
Visit In The Crack

In The Crack
(1)
Reply of Davit's Review from Drooler:

One thing I'd like to add to Davit's comprehensive review is the amount of annotation done for the videos. Those notes have really helped me to decide which videos I wanted to download. And they're very frank, such as the notes on the ass massage of Michaela Fenclova (Evelin at TheCrack) being done with male hands, which some may not like.

Very few sites include this much in the way liner notes, tune by tune.


03-08-08  04:35am

Reply
24
Visit Only Cuties

Only Cuties
(0)
Reply of Davit's Review from Drooler:

Nice review, Davit. You make your points eloquently on the subject of "disinspiration," if I may coin a term. I agree with everything you said here. It's rare that a review so completely matches my own experiences and opinions of a site.

03-08-08  04:26am

Reply
25
Visit In The Crack

In The Crack
(1)
REPLY TO #7 from RagingBuddhist: (Davit's Reply)

That getting pixelly, as you call it, is called ghosting - something I've yet to see eliminated on any LCD monitor. Damn shame the powers that be (capitalist marketing) won out and sold us all on flat screens. I tried like hell to find a large CRT monitor that's hi-def but they just don't seem to make 'em anymore. Maybe someone following this thread has seen one online somewhere?

03-07-08  06:45pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 134 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.28 seconds.