Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Exploited College Girls

Visit Site
Exploited College Girls Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Amateur Girls
2. Hardcore Sex
3. Young Adults

DSL Media, LLC
2 Sites Listed
Partner: FcukCash - ExploitedCollegeGirls

Monthly: $29.49 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $59.49 (3 months, non-recurring)

View all Exploited College Girls Site Facts at TBP.

N/A
Feedback History  (6)

Active Reviews 0
Newbie Reviews 4
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 1
Review by TheBestPorn:

77.0
TBP Review

Date: 04-04-08

Type: Express

Spencer
+  Exclusive content.
+  Looks like real amateur material.
+  Updates come weekly.
+  Most scenes shot from two angles.
-  Site is pretty plain.
-  Quality is just average.
-  Only MPG videos offered.

User Reviews (5)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Newbie
80*
OMF456 (4) 11-30-08  11:12am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Cute Girls
Variety of Cum Shots and Types of Intercourse
Very Long Video Length
Weekly Updates
Cons: Blurred Guy Faces
Girls Aren't Real College Girls or even Amateurs
Too Many Scenes Of The Same Girl Doing The Same Thing
Bottom Line: Overall, I enjoy this site. I've been a member in the past and joined up again about a month ago and I'm going to go another month and see how it goes from there.

I really like that the girls are cute. That's the main selling point to this site. They really don't have any ugly girls.

You get a nice variety of sexual acts too. In addition to the main stuff in every porn video you get some rimming, some anal, some 2 guys on one girl.

My biggest Con with the site is that they're just using semi-established porn girls that you'll find on lots of sites. I wish they were real college girls or at last amateur girls but I can see where finding 4 real amateur college girls per month would be pretty hard to find so I'm give them a pass on that.

I'm not a big picture guy but I've noticed some of you are. They do offer nice picture sets of the scenes.

I kinda like the long length of the videos. They cut very little out of each shoot which can be cool but can also be sort of annoying so I just fast forward thru the boring stuff :-)

They offer two different versions of each shoot. One in POV format and one in .....ummmmm....not POV format. Not sure what to call that.

They charge $29.49 for a monthly membership. Fair deal in my book. They have 90+ scenes total so for $30, can't beat it as far as I'm concerned.

Hmmm, let's see, what else????????????? I think that just about covers everything. If you have any questions about anything I forgot to mention, just ask.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Newbie
67*
biguy77 (1) 08-06-08  03:39am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Easy navigation, well labeled update schedules, no hidden costs, real amateurs, and a solid amount of back cataloged updates are all excellent pros about this site. It is just ok and could really be something outstanding in the future.
Cons: I was very irritated to see the same woman repeated in certain updates with very little difference in the scenes. All the scenes follow the same formula which gets boring. It goes talk, toys, bj, standing on the side of the bed, doggie, anal, facial. I agree with other reviewers except I also find that the male actor is blurred out. I'm not annoyed about the guy needing the blur but it does become distracting, especially when it appears/disappears over the girls naughty parts simply because they dont know how to shoot the video from better angles and it takes me out of the moment watching the video. Would like there to be other males doing the fucking (for variety) and would like to see some creativity to the updates/girls/locations/camera angles/positions.
Bottom Line: Its great for about a month, or until you get bored. If you like the girls on the update pages a little bit its not worth it, if you think they are really hot then it is. This site feels like it is made for the man doing the fucking, he is doing the exploiting, filming, talking, everything, and it would be interesting if they brought back girls to get degraded more/worse if they are updated/featured again, or if the guy made faces about the girls behind there backs, or fucked in a different location then that one bed, and maybe without showing the lighting equipment in the background. I like the pro/am style but it gets boring after the two months that I've been a member.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Newbie
80*
pornagain (2) 07-10-08  07:06pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Exclusive material, very pretty girls, no ugly girls. He pulls out the sex toys and plays with the girls in many ways before the sexual intercourse. The guy is a good personality. Some anal scenes top off the site. It was better then my expectations.
Cons: Too many none intercourse scenes, not enough racial diversity. Still a small number of girls. It some times have the same girl updates in the same week ie. POV on monday and bj scene on friday. It does not have a network of other sites included.
Bottom Line: This is a good amuater site. expensive for a site with no network. But better then expected. It has great anal play and anal scenes which is a must for me. The preview section gives a good example of what you'll find. I'd sign up again its on my rotation now.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
89
qualsite34 (29) 10-09-07  11:30am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (2)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
85*
Pinche Kankun (Disabled) 08-05-07  04:17am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (4)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (3 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (1)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Pinche Kankun (Disabled) 05-09-07  11:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (4)

PREVIEW AND VISUALS

This website seems interesting because of all the gorgeous college girls you have. However the one thing that I cannot stand is the fact you have to bust you load on their faces!! Basically, the only reason I would join this website is for one scene with 18 year old Alex, because it appears to me that she felt so good to the guy that was having sex with her that she made him have to pull out and empty his load all over her very sexy body. WHAT A CUMSHOT, THE KIND I LIKE!! Then they go again, and when he unloaded again, he unloaded on her butt!! See, those are the kind of cumshots that any website, adult film, or porn video should have!! I CANNOT STAND FACIAL CUMSHOTS AND I BET YOU THAT I AM SPEAKING FOR A NUMBER OF OTHER PORN VIEWERS WITH THE SAME CONCERN!!

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

RSS FeedsAll Exploited College Girls Activity - Exploited College Girls Reviews - Exploited College Girls Comments - Exploited College Girls News

Visit Exploited College Girls

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  None Registered

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Back Room Casting Couch (1) 89.0 74.0
2. Exploited College Girls (0) N/A 77.0

RSS Feed : DSL Media, LLC Activity

View All: Company Sites (2)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.