| User Reviews (4) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Easy navigation, well labeled update schedules, no hidden costs, real amateurs, and a solid amount of back cataloged updates are all excellent pros about this site. It is just ok and could really be something outstanding in the future. |
| Cons: |
I was very irritated to see the same woman repeated in certain updates with very little difference in the scenes. All the scenes follow the same formula which gets boring. It goes talk, toys, bj, standing on the side of the bed, doggie, anal, facial. I agree with other reviewers except I also find that the male actor is blurred out. I'm not annoyed about the guy needing the blur but it does become distracting, especially when it appears/disappears over the girls naughty parts simply because they dont know how to shoot the video from better angles and it takes me out of the moment watching the video. Would like there to be other males doing the fucking (for variety) and would like to see some creativity to the updates/girls/locations/camera angles/positions. |
| Bottom Line: |
Its great for about a month, or until you get bored. If you like the girls on the update pages a little bit its not worth it, if you think they are really hot then it is. This site feels like it is made for the man doing the fucking, he is doing the exploiting, filming, talking, everything, and it would be interesting if they brought back girls to get degraded more/worse if they are updated/featured again, or if the guy made faces about the girls behind there backs, or fucked in a different location then that one bed, and maybe without showing the lighting equipment in the background. I like the pro/am style but it gets boring after the two months that I've been a member. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Exclusive material, very pretty girls, no ugly girls. He pulls out the sex toys and plays with the girls in many ways before the sexual intercourse. The guy is a good personality. Some anal scenes top off the site. It was better then my expectations. |
| Cons: |
Too many none intercourse scenes, not enough racial diversity. Still a small number of girls. It some times have the same girl updates in the same week ie. POV on monday and bj scene on friday. It does not have a network of other sites included. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a good amuater site. expensive for a site with no network. But better then expected. It has great anal play and anal scenes which is a must for me. The preview section gives a good example of what you'll find. I'd sign up again its on my rotation now. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent selection of authentic looking college girls - All never before seen.
Videos are extra long
Viewer offered choice of camera angle. POV or off to the side (One file for each angle)
Videos can be streamed or downloaded by individual scene or in total. |
| Cons: |
Video quality is only average by todays standards
No photos
Style and format of videos is copied from Exploitedteens.com which may bother some individuals |
| Bottom Line: |
I highly recommend this site to anyone looking for fresh faced amateur college girls. I counted 45 with no familiar faces. They all look and sound like they just stepped off of campus. Supposedly the girls are all from Arizona State. Anyway, I really need to mention something strange about this site. It seems the style and format is almost exactly like that of Exploitedteens which is one of my favorite sites. The only thing different is the guy behind the camera and the girls. The script is almost word for word
from Exploitedteens which by the way is very unique. I'm thinking either "Mike" from Exploitedteens is franchising his schtick or this is a blantant ripoff of another site. I don't have the answer, but I can say this is a great site and well worth the price of admission. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
I would say 90% of these teen college girls are actually teens and they are hot looking girls!! I joined this site for a month, that was only because I saw a preview of 18-year-old ALEX, her tummy got smothered in cum! I had to see how that happen!! Good Missionary sex positions!! |
| Cons: |
In my opinion, too many facials, not enough body cumshots!! The same guy doing the same thing that I don't like can get a little a boring, to the point where one month of my money is all it will get!! |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like college girls and plenty and facial cumshots, join the site!! |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Exploited College Girls Activity - Exploited College Girls Reviews - Exploited College Girls Comments - Exploited College Girls News
