Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Exploited College Girls

Visit Site

Exploited College Girls

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Amateur Girls
2. Hardcore Sex
3. Young Adults

DSL Media, LLC
2 Sites Listed
Partner: FcukCash - ExploitedCollegeGirls

Monthly: $24.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $75.00 (3 months, non-recurring)

View all Exploited College Girls Site Facts at TBP.

86.0
Feedback History  (29)

Active Reviews 2
Newbie Reviews 8
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 12
Review by TheBestPorn:

84.0
TBP Review

Date: 01-28-14

Type: 2.0

Duke
+  Exclusive Hardcore Episodes, Hot Amateurs & Scene Variety.
+  100's of Scenes & Models, Lengthy Shoots, Intros/Interviews.
-  Lower Level Older Videos, Viewing Options Vary.
-  Lots of Content but Limited Search/Filter Tools.

User Reviews (14)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Shown : 1-10 of 14 Next Page >

Active
88
rearadmiral (328) 08-12-13  04:28pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (70), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large site
- Mostly unknown models
- Models very good looking
- Lots of opportunity to see the modelís personality
- Includes two other sites
- Supports download managers
- No obvious time-outs
- Scenes are available as a single download or as clips
Cons: - Could offer more HD
- Could offer niche tags
Bottom Line: This site is a recipe for disaster in many ways: it is simplistic, formulaic, mostly POV-based and uses only one male talent. But in this case the site is much greater than the sum of its parts. The simple layout works in this case since the site is based around the female talent, the formula may be the same in every scene but I found that formula added to the heat in the scenes. While POV can be annoying, the male talent here must have some serious practice because this is some of the best POV work Iíve ever seen, and finally, that male talent doesnít fall into the trap that so many other one-man-shows do Ė he doesnít ever lose site of the fact that members are joining to see the girls, not him.

The glue that holds this site together is the quality of models that get recruited. While there isnít a lot of variety, the choice of model is something that aims for the biggest chunk of the market: young, fit, petite, and usually Caucasian. Iím one of those people who like the siteís choice of models and I really like what the site has to offer. To further the appeal, the models are never caked with heavy makeup and dressed in slutty clothes. The site accentuates each modelís natural beauty rather than covering it.

A sharp contrast between this site and the sites I normally join is that the sites I normally join use the better known porn models working at the time. I have little experience with amateur sites but with very rare exceptions these are models Iíve never seen before or since. I have no idea how the site recruits the models, but whatever theyíre doing they should keep doing it because it works.

The scenes all have a common theme: a Ďcollege girlí is enticed to dip her toes into the world of porn. The girlís youth and appearance certainly lends credibility to the overall theme. A viewer could really get lost in the fantasy that this is an otherwise innocent college student who is about to do something nasty for our viewing pleasure.

Many of the scenes start with the cameraman / male talent picking the model up. As they drive an interview in conducted which is usually pretty interesting. In many of these scenes the interview progresses to some nudity in the car and is often followed by some road head. In rare cases the girl will actually ride the guy while he drives. Sure, itís dangerous, but itís great to watch!

Other scenes begin in a hotel room but there is still an interview process.

The scenes then transition to some posing, usually some oral on the girl, oral on the guy, sex in multiple positions and finally a money shot, usually on the face. Most of the scenes then have some footage shot after the scene, which is also interesting to watch.

The site layout is simple, but simple works here. The scenes all have the same theme so the biggest difference is the model herself. I do wish that there were some tags offered, though there really wouldnít be many. A tag for anal scenes (there are a few) would be great, and maybe even a tag to sort by the modelís age would be a good addition.

One feature that I like a lot is that while a lot of the camera work is POV, there are also two or three fixed cameras set up too. Thatís good to provide some variety but the site uses split-screens to capture two views at once. Half the screen might be a shot of the model getting fucked in the doggy position while the other half is a close-up of her face. This is a great effect and really works well.

Iím not sure if this is a pro or a con, but many of the older shoots arenít edited to vary the shots between POV and the fixed camera. Instead, they offer the full scene from either viewpoint. Iím glad they dropped this practice and started editing, but it does offer an option for viewers who prefer one or the other.

The site is large, offering about 320 scenes and it updates with one scene being added per week. Each scene is available as a single download or in clips if youíre only interested in a segment. The site supports download managers with no obvious time-outs.

Download resolutions vary. The best is 1280x720, 3000kb/s, many are 768x432 at 1800kb/s and the lowest are 640x360 at 1800. All are 30 fps. The older scenes donít look great by todayís standards, but they arenít bad. The medium resolution looks pretty good even though the specs would suggest otherwise. I think the biggest flaw is that the site could offer higher resolutions. Also, WMVs are pretty much all that are available.

Photos are available as singles or zips. I didnít download much, but what I saw was relatively low resolution at 1400x788.

The bottom line is that this site could have been a total mess if any part of it was badly done, but since all the elements are well done the site is very good on the technical bits. Once you factor in the newness and apparent innocence of the models this is an amazing site that I both highly recommend and have already added to my list of sites to come back to regularly.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Active
84
TheSquirrel (53) 06-19-13  06:23pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: No DRM, download limits, or pre checked cross selling.
Beautiful amateur girls in a good variety of shape size and colour.
Genuinely amateur and individual content with its own style.
Exclusive material and most of the girls will not be seen elsewhere.
Good lighting considering the niche.
Good streaming.
Good download speed.
Zipped pics.
Named files.
Girls listed chronological and alphabetically.
Inviting home pages and easy navigation.
Still updating.
Easy log in, site remembers your details, with only an easy to see word to copy.
Good customer oriented feel.
Cons: Poor rip off exchange rate with CCBill sign up.
Male lead can be a bit irritating at times.
One type of material.
No network of bonus sites.
A few too many fake breasts, and especially tattoos.
Condoms becoming more common.
Blurred face of male can sometimes spoil action.
Some bad camerawork and views at times. Can be amateurish.
New pics look like screencaps.
A polarised niche, you either love it or hate it.
Bottom Line: It's just an opinion but Exploited College Girls, takes this niche and nails it brilliantly. The girl next door types are the type you wish really were living next door instead of that rottweiler, but you know you'll never get that lucky.

There is a real amateur feel here and a lack of gloss, but the girls are so beautiful they don't need much gloss, they just need someone competent enough not to fuck up capturing them on video, and merely need to look their natural gorgeous best. This is where ECG scores. It is professionally lit, edited, and photographed well enough to be erotic, with the girls looking stunning. For me it's an excellent blend of professionalism and DIY amateurism, which isn't easy to do, because so many times you see beautiful girls being made to look unbelievably unsexy, by lousy lighting, bad excessive makeup, awful camerawork with awful unflattering angles, shot by morons you wouldn't trust to shoot a rock without blurring the picture.

The recent shoots are dated and I counted 286 girls a few weeks ago. Membership gives bonus access to Backroom Casting Couch, (on a quality par with ECG), and Net Video Girls plus some free movies. This isn't a network, it's a standalone DIY site, with quality material, and beautiful girls. Given the one man and his camera thing, it's done in a professional enough way to show off the girls to maximum effect, plus you get plenty of build up, dressing, undressing, and walking around naked and semi naked.

This is just my opinion, but I think the guy does a great job, even though he may not win any humanitarian, or upstanding church goer of the month awards...or maybe he might, we don't know who he is, as his face is blurred out, something that is annoying and can detract from the action. Backroom Casting Couch is the same.

New video spec is 768x432 at 4000-6000 kbps and slightly older ones are 640x360 at 3000-5000 kbps, with the oldest being 576x324, but this isn't about HD pristine quality with models looking like they've been dipped in bronze, it's about one man and a camera, and at it's most high tech, one man and two cameras, with occasional help from a mate.

Old pictures sometimes look better than the new ones, because the new ones are screencaps rather than genuine photos. Old ones are genuine photos, and some of the bonus video footage was behind the scenes, where you could see these being taken. I love that sort of stuff, but sadly newer updates don't have any of that, although the main videos always have a certain behind the scenes flavour due to the nature of the content.

If you're a pic fan, this is not the strongest side of ECG. Examples of picture spec are 1400x930, 1600x1200, 1280x857, 1280x720, and 1400x788.

Some PU'ers have referred to the male lead as a douch bag, but given the abuse, both verbal and physical, some girls receive on mainstream sites, this is relatively mild by comparison, and there are no dirty tricks on sign up or cancellation, no drm, dl limits, regional discrimination, or pre checked cross selling. What you see and are led to expect is very much what you get. In fact the whole site is easy to use and is customer friendly. You can't say that about many.

The login is easy, and your membership details plus password are remembered, with an easy to see simple word to copy. Models are listed both chronologically and alphabetically and navigation is easy, with quite detailed previews of what an update is like, plus a long written summary about the shoot. You may not like the main man's tone, but you can't say he doesn't put in the effort. Photos are zippped, download speeds are fast, and files are numbered.

I found streaming facilities to be excellent even at peak times, when on other sites (VideoBox for instance) it's impossible to get a picture. A recent addition is the split screen view, where you see both the model's face and the other end at the same time, which is okay, but sometimes the two screens seem to get in the way of one another. There are a few scenes with condoms which are becoming more common.

When I recently visited the sign up page then closed the window, I received a $5 off offer if I joined now. That worked out at £17.44 for 30 days, which I accepted. When I went to cancel my subscription I received another cut price offer, which I was unable to accept as I currently don't have the time to download.

If this is the future of porn, with semi amateur girls, and semi professional shooting, done on a budget, I would be happy with that. I don't think it is, but what he is doing, with the niche, style of shooting, reality behind the scenes feel, lighting, camerawork, number of updates, price, and personalisation of site, works for him, and for me too as a customer. This is very close to how I would want to see reality porn with sexy looking amateur girls, I don't believe for one moment that is easy to do. Even the pros get it wrong more often than not, so hats off to ECG.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply

Newbie
63*
bestimmt (2) 11-10-12  02:00pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - New, fresh, beautiful women.

- High quality video.

- Long videos with LOTS of sex.

- Videos contain a large degree of variety - different sex acts (blowjobs, vaginal, anal) and lots of different angles.
Cons: - Most videos force these poor women to lick - for a long time - this disgusting guy's disgusting butt-hole. I don't know who finds that sexy, but I think it is absolutely disgusting. Gross.

- The male "talent," (i.e. prop) who is also the camera guy, talk throughout the entire video. And not what you'd expect like asking the girl to talk about herself, etc. They ask stupid questions like "does that feel good?", "am I better than your boyfriend?" and "have you ever had one that big before?" It is constant and is a complete distraction and turn-off. Its gotten to the point where I have to completely mute the videos to watch them or I can't stomach it. Recently, they started using a new prop, whose voice is not quite so whiny, nasal and annoying as the guy who used to do this before, but the new prop still won't shut up and its a big problem.

- Site navigation is very difficult. 5 or so videos per page, in date order, that's it.
Bottom Line: This site's (lone) redeeming quality is, without a doubt, the girls. They are new, they are young, and they are beautiful. Usually I have never seen them before, or this is the first time I've seen them and I see them again later on. They do a lot of different sex acts (more on this later), sometimes do anal, etc. (The people who complain that the anal is not sexy because the girl is in obvious pain are absolutely correct. I like anal but I completely avoid it on this site).

There are two major problems with this site that make it not worth the $35 to join - first, the constant inane talking out of the male prop. As I mentioned before, its comments like "is that a big dick?" and "tell me you're my little whore". The talking is constant and appears designed to stroke the performers' fragile egos rather than designed to contribute to the video. Originally, they had a guy doing all the videos who not only talked CONSTANTLY, but had the single most annoying voice on the planet. Thankfully, they seem to have replaced him (no doubt after constant complaints from members), but the new guy, while he does not have as annoying of a voice, is no better in the constant blathering department.

But the one thing that drives me absolutely nuts about the videos is these guys' obsession with their own ass holes. I am convinced they are actually homosexuals (not that there's anything wrong with that). The video will be going along nicely, and then all of a sudden, out of the middle of nowhere, its "lick my ass hole baby." Disgusting. Absolutely disgusting. Not to mention degrading to these women. And it lasts a LONG time too - its not just one lick and they're done - no - "more," "stick your tongue in there, baby." How these beautiful models can allow themselves to be subjected to sticking their tongues inside the butt hole of a disgusting guy is beyond me. I hope they're getting paid piles and piles of money for this. This absolutely ruins their videos for me. I mean, if it were in one predictable place, you could at least know to fast forward through it - not that that would redeem the fact that they do it. But it appears at random and there is no way to predict when you're going to get a long, detailed close up of man anus and scrotum. Without this act in their videos, I give the web site a 75. This just ruins it for me - there are no redeeming qualities to this despicable act. I feel so sorry for the models who are subjected to these animals.

Lastly, as others have pointed out but it merits repeating, these guys are chicken to have their faces shown on camera (of course, no problem putting the women on camera, but you get their faces in the shot and they run screaming like little girls). This severely limits the angles (its pov/mounted camera shot, so the angles are already severely limited). While I think they do an ok job editing the videos together, it is still a problem.

All in all, the videos are long, lots of sex, and the quality is decent. But, the incessant talking and the lengthy close ups of disgusting hairy man anus ruin it completely. Not worth the money and I would not recommend spending your hard-earned money on a membership to this train wreck of a web site.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
77
pat362 (369) 03-15-12  12:25pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (7 Replies)

Expired
89
dracken (246) 10-23-11  05:10pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (65), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
80*
bently (3) 02-24-11  07:26am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
79
slutty (111) 09-01-10  11:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (48), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (8 Replies)

Expired
98*
coneyman (0) 05-02-10  03:35am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
90*
guhe (1) 04-19-10  06:15pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (4)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
80*
OMF456 (4) 11-30-08  11:12am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-10 of 14 Next Page >
User Comments (12)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Shown : 1-10 of 12 Next Page >

joeblow0102 (Unverified) 08-01-14  10:46pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Cute young girls too many facial

The girls are cute and young. The casting,fucking, and anals are amazing but how can u fuck such a cute young girl and not cum inside of her? It seems like every girl is a facial.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

rearadmiral (328) 06-02-14  04:45pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (70), NO (0)

Quality of models has slipped in past months

Iím on my third membership here and find that since the last time I was here the quality of the models has diminished. Most of the recent updates have had models that arenít up to the standards that Iíve seen in earlier uploads. If youíre a first-time member this wonít be an issue, but if youíre coming back to the site after a while you may want to look carefully at the preview pages. The same is happening with the sister site, Back Room Casting Couch.

This was one of my favorite sites and I hope they get their groove back soon.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

dracken (246) 11-20-11  11:38am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (65), NO (1)

Great news!

Bacroomcastingcouch is now available as a bonus if you join exploited college girls.

Not sure if you get ECC as a bonus for joining BCC but either way this is great news. These two sites go together like peanut butter and jelly, and it's awesome to see this package deal.

No reason not to join these two great sites now.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

slutty (111) 10-15-11  09:35pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (48), NO (0)

Back-out discount

Not sure if you are supposed to post this stuff here, but they give you a back-out price of $25 in a popup when you leave.

Just in case anyone was going to be joining here, might be worth trying.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

lk2fireone (194) 06-06-11  01:28pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)

What are the 23 bonus sites included in membership?

In PU reviews, bently and slutty mention the sister site, backroomcastingcouch, is not included in a membership to this site. And also that the membership price is too high.
So what are the bonus sites that are mentioned as included in a membership on the sign-up page, but not listed?

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

bjorn7 (19) 01-02-11  01:19pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)

Price increase?

I was looking to join today so I clicked on the join link. TBP lists the monthly membership at $24.95. Today I was shocked to see $34.97 per month on the join page. Anybody else notice this? Is there another link to get the $24.95 price?

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

slutty (111) 08-28-10  02:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (48), NO (0)

Poor download speeds

I have been averaging less than 200 KB/sec (total DL speed) since joining this site, hopefully it is just a technical problem, but certainly not promising. Also since logins timeout, download managers haven't been working so well (path disappears).

On the plus side, the content I have been able to download is pretty decent.

Also, in response to dracken's question, no network access from this site either - there are bonus sites but they all appear to be streaming only.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

dracken (246) 07-02-10  10:43pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (65), NO (1)

Network access

I really like the feel of this site, but does anyone know if it comes along with a subscription to back room castings? I would love to get those two for the price of one, yet no one is really clear about what your subscription includes.

Anyway, expect a review on this one shortly :)

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

guhe (1) 04-18-10  12:51am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (4)

GREAT SITE

I LIKE THIS SITE A LOT, PRETTY GIRLS AND HARD CORE MATERIAL, THIS IS WORTH THE MONEY.

STILL UPDATING!

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Capn (28) 02-18-10  03:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)

Poor Tour

So far as I can pick up, it offers no samples of full size photos or videos?

Or am I missing something somewhere?

Cap'n. :0/

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Shown : 1-10 of 12 Next Page >

Visit Exploited College Girls

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Exploited College Girls (2) 86.0 84.0
2. Back Room Casting Couch (1) 85.0 79.0

View All: Company Sites (2)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.45 seconds.