| User Reviews (5) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cute Girls
Variety of Cum Shots and Types of Intercourse
Very Long Video Length
Weekly Updates |
| Cons: |
Blurred Guy Faces
Girls Aren't Real College Girls or even Amateurs
Too Many Scenes Of The Same Girl Doing The Same Thing |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, I enjoy this site. I've been a member in the past and joined up again about a month ago and I'm going to go another month and see how it goes from there.
I really like that the girls are cute. That's the main selling point to this site. They really don't have any ugly girls.
You get a nice variety of sexual acts too. In addition to the main stuff in every porn video you get some rimming, some anal, some 2 guys on one girl.
My biggest Con with the site is that they're just using semi-established porn girls that you'll find on lots of sites. I wish they were real college girls or at last amateur girls but I can see where finding 4 real amateur college girls per month would be pretty hard to find so I'm give them a pass on that.
I'm not a big picture guy but I've noticed some of you are. They do offer nice picture sets of the scenes.
I kinda like the long length of the videos. They cut very little out of each shoot which can be cool but can also be sort of annoying so I just fast forward thru the boring stuff :-)
They offer two different versions of each shoot. One in POV format and one in .....ummmmm....not POV format. Not sure what to call that.
They charge $29.49 for a monthly membership. Fair deal in my book. They have 90+ scenes total so for $30, can't beat it as far as I'm concerned.
Hmmm, let's see, what else????????????? I think that just about covers everything. If you have any questions about anything I forgot to mention, just ask. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Easy navigation, well labeled update schedules, no hidden costs, real amateurs, and a solid amount of back cataloged updates are all excellent pros about this site. It is just ok and could really be something outstanding in the future. |
| Cons: |
I was very irritated to see the same woman repeated in certain updates with very little difference in the scenes. All the scenes follow the same formula which gets boring. It goes talk, toys, bj, standing on the side of the bed, doggie, anal, facial. I agree with other reviewers except I also find that the male actor is blurred out. I'm not annoyed about the guy needing the blur but it does become distracting, especially when it appears/disappears over the girls naughty parts simply because they dont know how to shoot the video from better angles and it takes me out of the moment watching the video. Would like there to be other males doing the fucking (for variety) and would like to see some creativity to the updates/girls/locations/camera angles/positions. |
| Bottom Line: |
Its great for about a month, or until you get bored. If you like the girls on the update pages a little bit its not worth it, if you think they are really hot then it is. This site feels like it is made for the man doing the fucking, he is doing the exploiting, filming, talking, everything, and it would be interesting if they brought back girls to get degraded more/worse if they are updated/featured again, or if the guy made faces about the girls behind there backs, or fucked in a different location then that one bed, and maybe without showing the lighting equipment in the background. I like the pro/am style but it gets boring after the two months that I've been a member. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Exclusive material, very pretty girls, no ugly girls. He pulls out the sex toys and plays with the girls in many ways before the sexual intercourse. The guy is a good personality. Some anal scenes top off the site. It was better then my expectations. |
| Cons: |
Too many none intercourse scenes, not enough racial diversity. Still a small number of girls. It some times have the same girl updates in the same week ie. POV on monday and bj scene on friday. It does not have a network of other sites included. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a good amuater site. expensive for a site with no network. But better then expected. It has great anal play and anal scenes which is a must for me. The preview section gives a good example of what you'll find. I'd sign up again its on my rotation now. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (3 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Exploited College Girls Activity - Exploited College Girls Reviews - Exploited College Girls Comments - Exploited College Girls News
