Nice review John. Got the point across with out being too wordy.
I think, though, that I must agree with Elephant, in that I too enjoy seeing girl-girl pee. Don't ask why, everyone's personal selection of why they like one genre of porn is different. Multiple girls pissing is just something that I would like to see. I would really like it if instead of just 2 girls, they had scenes of 3 or 5 or 10 girls all peeing together and on each other...
Are there any "associated sites" that are included or does one only get VIPissy? I see they are part of the Epoch network, and just wondered if there are any "bonus" sites included in the price of admission.
What LPee said - double his comments. I love it. Especially watching women pee. It is so hidden and forbidden, that just makes it all the more exciting. Yes it is a fetish that some are not interested in. But it is also a fetish that some of us can not get enough of. One of my fantasies would be almost like reverse bukkake, to have a whole bunch of women stand around and over me, and then pee on me until I am soaking wet.
Like Jberryl69's comments, I too have no clue as to what I am supposed to have. Suffice to say that usually I can watch HD videos on youtube with no problem, but I notice that in the evening, prime time, the speed is slower, and yt can not provide streaming video without pausing.
So next I tried the link that like2fireone suggested, and I found that its speed test shows 9043Kb/s download, 783 Kb/s upload and 38ms latencey.
But that was in the middle of the day, I bet it goes to hell at 7pm. And I bet it would be even better at 4 in the morning.
I would gladly trade 10% of my download speed for a doubling of my upload, as I try to post video to YT, and it can be very frustrating to have what I think of as a 10 minute (HD) video take 2 or more hours to upload.
Well that did it, between reading your blog on here about AO30, and having not subscribed to any sites for a month or two, I figured what the hell. So I became a member of AO30 yesterday. This was a blog of yours about AO30 wasn't it? Sure seemed like one.
Anyway, first impression of the site is good, THANKS!
I will try to write a proper review in a week or two.
I am deeply saddened that your results with Wet and Pissy, were not as good as mine with Wet and Puffy. I had tried my best, it was my first review, to be as accurate as I could at the time that I wrote my review. I had joined Wet and Puffy, and was able to access all three of their sites. Yes, I did have to sign into each one separately, if I remember correctly, but I did access all three, and was happy with my results.
I see that after 7 comments you were able to resolve your issues with the web host and it appears that things have been worked out. That is good, and I hope long term that you are not upset with my having given what I believed then, and still believe was my honest opinion of the Wet and Puffy site.
20 TB ! Wow, I thought I had collected a bunch and I'm just under one TB. I may have to go buy another external disk drive, but then I would have to organize my collection, and that would seem too much like work.
My collection of porn, is currently growing more in the video area, although for years, I went mostly for photos. As the quality of video has improved in the last couple years I have gone more that way, although I still very much enjoy, and often go back to look at, photos.
This pretty much echos my thoughts on FTV. I had a membership about 2 years ago, and found some very nice videos, etc, but felt that there was just too much repetition of the scenes and I lost interest. It's too bad, because at first I was really enthusiastic about the site. Don't think I would spend the $ to "re-up" unless there was a significant discount. But it might be fun to take one more look, I will have to give it some thought.
Talking by the camera person may be good or bad depending on the situation, a bit of chat about the model can sometimes help the video. It probably shouldn't overshadow the whole scene, but if it can enhance and help to draw one in or set the scene, then it is good.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
- She is cute.
- Videos avail in at least 720p (h264 or wmv)
- Photo sets download in Zip files
- Updates about 1 or 2 times per week.
- Navigation & Use of web site is easy.
- SHE is cute - the operative word is SHE, this site is based on one young lady only.
- Updates, appear to always be a set of photos as a “movie teaser” followed by a video. Thus maybe 2 updates per week.
- not much variety here.
This is the “bonus” site which one receives with a subscription to Young Legal Porn. Both of these sites are controlled via Dieselaccess.com. Their advertising suggests that the longer one keeps re-subscribing, the more bonus sites that will be added, I have not been a member long enough for that to happen, and following my usual pattern I am dropping my subscription after only one month. Nothing wrong with the two sites, but I just want to move on.
As of Nov 2012 there were 77 videos available on this site, all featuring Gloria, a cute and quite skinny young lady. Most vids are Solo, Striptease. There are 87 photo sets, also of Gloria. A few videos were lesbian, and I found one photo set with Gloria and a man.
The site also links to the same live shows that one can access from Young Legal Porn. While they are live shows, I found the video of the shows to be very small, and difficult to see.
Billing for this (as for Young Legal Porn) is through CCBill, and as I have found with other sites using CCBill, signup and cancellation proved easy.
Diesel Access provides you with a password of their choice at signup, 16 random characters and numbers, so you must save the email or password somewhere, as it is virtually impossible to memorize. This does provide good security, but is difficult to remember if you don’t let your pc remember passwords for you. There has been discussion of this topic in the Porn Users Forum.
Over all thoughts and score: As a bonus site, this is worth looking at for a day or so, but that is the end of it. As a stand alone site, I wouldn’t find it worth the price of admission. There is just too little content here to make it valuable. I am giving it a 60 because it is technically good. The lack of variety and content cause it to get a low score.
Yes! I too use a word processor for my initial building of a review. It usually takes me 3 or 4 days to write everything, even though they are short reviews. I need to think about what I want to say, and then I need to remember more before I post.
But I always find that I need to edit my thoughts all the way to the final point of posting.
Met-Art is on my list of sites to try someday. I just can't try all sites at one time. So many good sites, so little time to really enjoy.
Anyway, my thoughts go to your suggestions for a photo naming convention. I fully agree that the model's name should be the first part of the photo name! Then some intermediate data, your suggestion of the date is excellent, or possibly a short description of the set, and finally ending with a photo number within the set.
Now if only more sites would use a longer name, or a convention like this, rather than renumbering all photos to 001, 002, 003, etc within each downloaded, system generated zip file.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
- Very high quality video and photos - extremely clear.
- Most recent videos (2012) are 1080p, either h264 or WMV format.
- Videos also avail in sd480 and ld360 format
- Variety: Solo, Boy-Girl, Girl-Girl
- Daily updates - usually both video and photo set, although occasionally only one or the other.
- Fairly fast downloads (this depends so much on your ISP that I can only say it felt fast to me.)
- Very cute girls
- Search by “topic”, for example - 69, Bathroom, Dildo, Hardcore, Small Tits, allows selection of multiple criteria.
- Photo sets download in zip files.
- I could not get download to work with Free Download Manager.
- Vids have advertisement, short but annoying, for another site.
- Older content, as one might expect, is lower quality / resolution.
- The “ratings” tabs at very top of screen are confusing.
- Photo sets in zipfiles all have the same file names. 001.jpg, 002.jpg, etc.
Where to begin? The girls are lovely, beautiful, young! The name of the site is a clear indication of what you may expect. A quick review of the model list shows virtually all are 18 or 19 years old, and European.
In those videos where it is a “boy/girl” scene, even some of the boys are very cute, although I don’t usually focus on the guys, the ones here are worth watching.
- I counted 12 videos listed in a single screen, with the ability to step through 91 screen loads, so that would be about 1092 videos available.
- "The Girls" section had 21 models listed per page, and 17 pages, so about 147 models.
- Photo galleries were 12 per page, and 106 pages so that's about 1272 photo sets or galleries.
I like to save the photo sets in a single directory after downloading, since each file set re-uses the file names of 001, 002, 003 etc within each set, it is an extra bother to have to batch rename each set so that I can store multiple sets in a single directory. I have seen this type of naming at other sites as well, and it may discourage photo set downloads. I would prefer a naming convention of “girls-name, shoot-id, then photo number. For example Karen-02-001.Jpg. But every site has their own methods, this is just a pet peeve of mine.
Another reviewer commented on the relative scarcity of anal sex, and listed this as a negative, it may well be for some viewers, but for others of us this is a positive. Therefore I have listed it in my comments section, as I believe such things are much more in the eyes, or should I say fantasies, of the beholder, rather than attributes of the site. I personally prefer less anal action and more “pussy”.
This site also has live shows, which are clearly scheduled and easy to access. However the video that goes with the live shows if SMALL. If you enjoy the banter and chat, with a number of other guys and the one lady, then you may like this. I found it less than exciting.
I don’t have a very objective scoring system for sites, maybe someone else can suggest a consistent scheme for scoring, so I am going to give this site a good rating simply because I like the videos and found the site fairly easy to navigate. The only real problem that I have had has been the inability to use FDM to control my downloads. BTW it seems to work, but then downloads a very short video that says I am not authorized to download.
The site lists one "bonus site", which contains one girl. There are comments to the effect that the longer you keep your membership, the more bonus sites you will get, but at this point I don't have the benefit of this feature. And if the other sites are like the one bonus that one gets initially, it may not be of particular benefit.
Billing for this site is through CCBill.
Bottom line: The site holds my attention with high quality videos and photo sets. I can let my mind wander, enjoy the beauty of the models, daydream myself into being with them, enjoy a long slow porn watching session. What more could an old guy expect from any site with lovely young ladies.
Maybe, since I was a newbie at this site, I didn't focus as much on the volume of updates. And since my subscription was to 21Sextreme only, not to 21Sextury, I did not realize that their other site (suite of sites) was updated more frequently.
In any case, as I found that I was not enjoying the site, nor its content, the rate of updating did not seem particularly important to me.
I will however keep your concerns about updating somewhere in the back of my mind, and hopefully remember it in any future reviews that I may write.
Thanks for your comments, it is only by constructive comments that my reviews will improve with time.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Large number of videos
Multiple sites included in a single membership (list below in comments)
Regular updates (on some of the included sites - others are stale)
Recent videos are HD
category ( I counted 136 categories to choose from )
Some of included sites have not updated for a couple years
Download choices are not clear about size of video - what do the following really mean:
Low Quality H.264
Medium Quality WMV
Medium Quality H.264
High Quality WMV
Ultra High Quality WMV
Ultra High Quality H.264
The older - no longer updated sites - have very low quality video
There are also “bonus” sites, which appear to be even older and not updated.
Was it just me, and my tastes in porn, or did I just get bored with this site (network of sites) very fast. The older guys in the Grandpas Fuck Teens, really were old turn offs for me. (of course if I ever had a video of my own - I am sure I would be even worse than any of them were - so who am I to complain)
I have long had an interest in pee fetish, and was very hopeful about the Zoliboy site. There are some interesting videos there, and I did like some of them very much, but there were also too many videos of old guys pissing on younger women, which just didn’t quite work out for me. 3 guys standing on a platform showering a girl below in pee, just isn’t what I wanted. But I do understand that pee videos are a small niche, and everyone has their own preferences. You might really like this.
It took me a while to figure out that when one selects to view a video, there are a number of short clips from each video presented, as well as the entire video as a single clip.
Net result of being a member for the past three weeks is that I realized that this site is just not what I wanted. I can’t exactly describe what it is about it that does not match my thoughts, but something which I had hoped for, something nebulous, just wasn’t there, so I have canceled my membership.
The fetishes were maybe a little to “strong” for me. The “use” of women, for example in the Teach me fisting site just wasn’t for me.
If you like this site great! I just felt uncomfortable with it. I have tried to be objective - in that the site does what it says - and if you like what this site offers, then it is well built and works fine - it just didn’t work for me.
The question here in this poll, as one notices lately also with political polls, is "what is the polling methodology, and how are the questions asked?".
The methodology here, is to ask members to respond, that requires some effort on each members part so is somewhat limiting on who will participate, only those of us who want to contribute will answer.
And then there is the measurement issue, of how to decide what it means to "stay over one year", is that to "never use your login id again for a year"? The site, if it keeps records of a user's last login, could track how many users have a last login date over one year old, and compare that to the total number of users. But even that can be misleading, as it would probably be best to limit the total user count to those where their initial sign up date was more than a year in the past, it certainly would not be valid to count someone like me who only signed up a bit over a month ago.
Come back in a year from now to see if I stay active.
I was able to access each of them. I needed to re-key my user id and password for each site, but both did let me access them. I downloaded video from each of them, but found the weliketosuck less interesting than the wet and pissy. Of course that is based on my interests and desire to see pee videos. I found the sucking ones just somewhat boring.
This comment added 3 weeks after I signed up for Wet and Puffy . . . I have since downloaded many videos from both wet and puffy and wet and pissy. I have canceled re-bills, as I have as many videos as I found interesting downloaded, and see no need to continue to pay for the few additional that may be added over the course of a month, although I may come back in a year or so for more.
Overall, it was a good site (sites) for pissing videos, which is what I wanted. I realizethat this is a niche market, and that I fall into that small group who want to see peeing, but for us it is good clear pee video with lots of close ups. For others, it would certainly be a waste of hard earned money.
Thanks for your comments. Yes pissing is certainly a small niche market, but between the "wet and puffy" and their related "wet and pissy" site, you will see a bunch of it here. There is some of the drinking and pouring you mentioned, not in all cases, but maybe 10 to 20 % of the videos do include those things. What I like are the clear closeups of pissing, some with lips spread wide so you can really see it streaming (steaming) out.
And I also agree with you on the big taco and juicy cherry stuff. Maybe because SWMBO has a peachy pussy.
It certainly is mostly a solo site, there are a few lesbian vids, and even a few where a guy is in there, but these (from what I have seen) are few and far between.
Ya know, I'm new at reviewing sites, at least at writing down my reviews. Been reviewing in my head for ages. I will try to watch for internal inconsistencies like this more carefully in the future. I agree "many" would probably have been a better choice of words.
Anyway I was more interested in the pissing than the toys. Have always liked watching girls pee. Don't know why, and have long since given up on trying to figure it out.
Thanks for your comments, I will try to improve my internal consistancies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.