| User Reviews (19) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1183 Videos, 856 girls
Weekly updates, usually on Thursdays
Videos range from 1 hour in length to sometimes over 2 hours. 90 minutes is about average
Some of the 18 year olds are still in high school when posing
No stupid story. The girls are here to get paid for having sex on camera. The action is all real. And we are here to enjoy that.
All newer videos are available in 4K, 1080, 720 and 480 for downloading. The streaming is done at 720.
Includes access to Backroom Casting Couch and BBC Surprise |
| Cons: |
Very few thunderous orgasms, although plenty of regular orgasms
Almost every scene ends with a facial. Cream pies are rare. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a sister site to Backroom Casting Couch, BBC Surprise, ExCogiGirls and Hot MILFS Fuck, although only the first two are included in this membership. This site started up in 2006 and has had weekly updates since that time, usually on a Thursday.
This review will focus on Exploited College Girls, not BCC or BBC Surprise. As KatyBuffs mentioned in her review, the site is now going by ExCogGirls, and is de-emphasizing the “Exploited” part. Even from the beginning, the Exploited part probably referred mostly to “college girls need money” than “we’re going to make her do stuff she doesn’t want to do.”
Most scenes have 1 boy and 1 girl performing. There are also some Boy-Girl-Girl and Boy-Boy-Girl. Most of the time there is a single studio guy doing the boy duties. For the past 3 or 4 years that dude has been Tyler Nixon. The two previous studio cocks were Jake Adams and Tim Cannon, both of whom passed away suddenly. The site creator, Steve, served this function for the first several years.
The formula starts with an interview with the girl. This usually lasts 5 to 10 minutes, and is almost always clothed. Of course there’s no need to be truthful when answering the questions, but I get the feeling that all of them really are. Especially for any girl that is first sex on camera or shy, there is a lot of giggling during the interview.
Then they get naked, with plenty of giggling to accompany the jiggling. This part usually takes only a minute or two before the girl is totally nude.
There follows the main event, and the sex is quite hot. Each scene since about 2023 has a helpful orgasm count with time stamps in the description, and there is even a count displayed in the video as each one happens. As I noted in the Cons, few of these are thunderous orgasms – some you might hardly notice. They are both self-reported by the girls after the fact, or sometimes reported by one of the members. But since they are not of the Meg Ryan at lunch variety, there is probably less acting going on and more actual releasing.
Finally comes the After Glow and a Shower. With lots of after-action reporting and the girls reliving the best parts of the scene. There is also a zipped photo set with each video.
The tag system is really good. If you go to the advanced filters, all of the tags are displayed so you can easily select one (and also see what options there are). Out of the 1183 videos, here are the counts for some of the tags:
First Anal Ever – 58; First Orgasm – 15; First Sex Toys – 91; Shy – 191; Fisting – 5; High School – 68; Tall – 26; Crying/Tears - 40
They reserve the right to throttle downloading, but I never ran into any restriction, and they don’t specify any. If you sign up via Porn Users, A 2-day trial goes for $1.00. One month is $19.99, rebilling at $19.99. 3 months non-recurring is $75, and one year recurring is $149.99 via PU. ccBill is the payment processor. The addition of two bonus sites makes the value here quite good. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (6 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (5 Replies)
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (7 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (14) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
