Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Exploited College Girls

Exploited College Girls (0)

pat362 (375) 03-15-12  12:25pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 03-15-12  07:07pm  (Update History)
Reason: I completely screwed up my reviews because this is for backroom casting couch. and not exploited college girl
Pros: +The content is all exclusif.
+The majority of the models are amateurs and this is one of the only places where you'll see them do porn. (although a few of them have had porn careers after this)
+There are some truly good looking models and there is also a good variety.
+They update with one new video a week.
+All updates are dated.
+Videos can be downloaded a sa complete file or you can download certain sections.
Cons: -The shooting style is very similar to backroom casting couch so it's all handheld POV, on a tripod or on the bed.
-Because the performer doesn't want his face to be seen then all the shots either avoid shooting above a certain height or his face his hidden.
-Videos can be dowloaded in MP4 or WMV but resolution is still only 640x360.
-The girls attempting anal tend to all be trying this for the first time so it's more often than not a fail or hard to watch because of pain.
Bottom Line: *I chose to join this site because you got access to backroom casting couch(see my next review). It's my second time here and it will be my last. The content still has potential but it can't overhsadow the unapealing ponr inside.

*The site is similar to backroom casting couch and girls do porn. It is superior to BCC but it is inferior to girl do porn. The problem is that the guy has to be in the videos so he has to be both cameraman and performer. I can see the appeal for any guy to want to have sex with these girls but that also means you mostly get handheld POV shots with less than steallar angles and that's when the camera isn't moving from left to right or being dep[osited on the bed to get a face shot.

*The one positive about this site vs back room casting couch is that the guy appears to want to make the girls happy and comfortable and that helps with the scene but not if anal is in it.
I only saw a couple of the girls appeared to be enjoying themselves during the anal. The bulk of the other videos are hard to watch or listen to because you can see and hear the gilrs in pain.

**If you like POV shot porn and you also like to see amateurs and can overlook the errors in the way the videos are shot then you might enjoy the site but be advised that it's 35$ and that is not a cheap amount to pay. It would be a lot easier to recommedn if it was in the 20$ to 25$ dollar range.**

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Cybertoad (Disabled) Nice review as always Pat, can not say I have ever heard of the site maybe good thing :-)
03-15-12  02:21pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #1 - Cybertoad :

Hi Cybertoad. Take a look at the review because you'll notice that it has completely changed since I screwed up my review. I used the info for backroom casting couch for exploited college girl. I have corrected my error and made a review for the other site. You will see that exploited gets a better score and review than it's sister site.
03-16-12  06:14am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) No stills here either then?

Cap'n. :0/

03-16-12  09:01am

Reply To Message


elephant (67) Some decent looking girls here looking at the models list, I like sometimes a more amateur feel.
03-18-12  07:21am

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #4 - elephant :

I know of a couple of these girls went further in their porn career so it's kind of interesting to see them in their beginning. The thing that kills it for me is the POV. I prefer when the porn is shot by someone other than the performer himself.
03-18-12  09:08am

Reply To Message


elephant (67) REPLY TO #5 - pat362 :

Yeah for sure that is a major annoyance having a crap angle or shaking cam zooming all over the place, needs a separate person to film it which for an amateur shoot isn't always a possibility I guess.
03-18-12  02:32pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #6 - elephant :

I can't say that I noticed too many problems in regards to zooming but the crappy angles and shaking is all there to be disliked by people like me. Mofo's let's try anal does a kind of similar types of videos and yet the guy at Mofo still manages to do a better job than this one. It's still POV and still crappy but there are levels of crappiness.
03-18-12  05:39pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.