Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Niche - Hardcore The category portal for a specific niche.

Hardcore Sex Reviews & Comments

Top Sites

Top rated and most active sites in the niche.

Top Rated

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. Blacked.com (3) 94.4
2. Nubiles.net (3) 90.5
3. 21Sextury.com (6) 90.5
4. Brazzers (3) 90.0
5. Wow Girls (3) 88.0
6. Bangbros Network (4) 87.4
7. X-Art (3) 83.7
8. DDF Network (3) 83.0
9. Team Skeet (3) 80.0
10. Babes Network.com (6) 79.2

Requires minimum of 3 reviews. This changes periodically.

View All: Top Rated Sites
Most Active

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. 21Sextury.com (6) 90.5
2. Babes Network.com (6) 79.2
3. Bangbros Network (4) 87.4
4. Blacked.com (3) 94.4
5. Nubiles.net (3) 90.5
6. Brazzers (3) 90.0
7. Wow Girls (3) 88.0
8. X-Art (3) 83.7
9. DDF Network (3) 83.0
10. Team Skeet (3) 80.0

Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.

View All: Most Active Sites

New Reviews

Latest 3 user reviews in this niche.

Visit Passion HD

1. Passion HD (1)

Pay
Active
70
Pyrenees (26) 08-18-15  08:20pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There are some pros for this site.

1) 124,000 + HD photos usually 200+ per scene
2) The photos can be downloaded all at once in a zip
3) 302 + scenes
4) Updates multiple times a week
5) Some of the greatest talent in the industry
6) Each scene has a nice trailer and screen caps
7) Multiple site discount savings of over 50% this is a great deal if you want all their material.
Cons: This site has some cons.

1) Can be hard to log in the first time.
2) Only 31.4% of the scenes are in 1080p MP4 HD. Those scenes are up to 2 GB in size but average 1.20 GB.
3) Does not take advantage of Talent
4) Some scenes have washed out look
5) Massage scenes and bondage scenes are very brief on the massage and bondage.
6) Only 4% of the scenes have anal.
7) About 20% of the scenes are threesomes with only a couple of DP's (Featuring Holly Michaels).
8) I hope you like Holly Micheals she is in 46 scenes or over 15% of the site.
9) A lot of the material here is from the site PornPros only it is not in nearly as good of HD. You may consider just going to PornPros.
Bottom Line: So this site (And its entire network) have been on my radar for a long time. I know what your thinking but you like brutal sex. Well I enjoy Heart core as well =). I was excited to join but had log in problems as soon as I attempted to log in. Then I was blocked for multiple log in attempts. I had to contact support but in fairness they responded very fast fixing the issue.

I am one of those people who like to download for my own collection. I was very excited because of the level of talent on this site. I was instantly disappointed in Passion HD. Even their most recent scenes are only 1.4 GB large in 1080p MP4 HD. This is a far cry from the quality I am used to. The greatest sin of this site is BOTH Sensi Pearl scenes (The MAIN reason I joined) are only in 480p MP4. This is one of the biggest let downs I have ever experienced. Combined her solo scenes are 450 MB ... I am horrified.

I mentioned earlier they have some of the best Heart core talent ever assembled. This includes August Ames, Riley Reid, Sensi Pearl, Alexis Adams just to name a few. But the problem is they do not direct them properly to show off their talents. There are scenes with super flexible girls but you would NEVER know it after watching the scene, likewise with big breasted girls they usually do not let em get shown properly in doggy style and that is a crime against humanity. About 10% of the scenes on this site are massage but it is the briefest massage you ever saw. This site could have been so much more.

Lets talk about scene quality. I downloaded all of their quality options for their 68.6% of scenes that are not in 1080p MP4 HD. The 1080p WMV and MPG options may as well not exist. They are much more bleached than the original scenes, slightly grainy and have periods of terrible pixelation caused by HORRIBLE encoding. On top of that these scenes have visual lag and distortion when you skip.

In my conclusion I cannot at this time suggest anyone place membership here. I even turned down the exceptional discount offer to their other sites which tells you just how disappointed I am in their work. I got in for $9 and the bottom line is it was not worth it.

Now if you just want to stream or enjoy pictures you may be VERY happy with this site.

What needs to change before I can suggest this site?

1) Release ALL of the content in 1080p MP4 HD. Even if it is only 1.25 GB in size I want that HD MP4 file.

2) In the future make use of the talented performers known assets. If they love anal DP those ladies, if they are flexible then highlight that for 10 mins in every position if they have great tata's then show them bounce in multiple positions. Use what is right in front of the camera.

3) I would like for every scene to be re-encoded to at least 3 GB of quality especially the Sensi Pearl scenes but I know this will never happen.

For a site with so much potential it is all for naught if none of these changes are made.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Erotica X

2. Erotica X (2)

Pay
Newbie
80*
hugow (4) 08-03-15  12:54pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Attractive women
Quality photography and videos.
"Women-friendly"
Cons: Performances are ultimately rather ho-hum.
Website navigation and UI is so bad that I felt that I was back at some Russian site 10-15 years ago, but with bigger, prettier photos. ie. Lipstick on a pig. It was so bad that it hastened my departure from this site.

Examples include not being able to go back to search results once you click on one of the results; losing your place in the model pages if you click on any particular model, etc.; baffling dead-ends.
Bottom Line: In the scheme of pornsites, I suppose this one rates a "Very Good." However, I found it quite disappointing compared to other top shelf erotic sites like X-Art. The models are beautiful and the quality of the photos and videos is technically good, but the performances themselves were, for the most part, pretty ho-hum standard fare. Overall, disappointing considering the good press this site has received elsewhere.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Girls Do Porn

3. Girls Do Porn (1)

Pay
Active
75
rearadmiral (380) 08-03-15  06:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - True amateurs
- Many stunning young models
- Nearly 300 scenes
- Multiple viewing options
- Fast downloads
- Bill through reputable billers
Cons: - Terrible site design
- Expensive if you want HD
- No model names or info
- No unique identifiers for scenes
- Site defaults back to page one
- Better porn options are available
Bottom Line: GDP is a site that reviewers either love or hate. Itís a site that has squandered its potential. The problem with the site is that it has some beautiful amateurs in some pretty good porn let down by one of the worst site layouts on the internet. If anyone can learn anything from this site itís how not to design a webpage.

The real value of the site is in the models themselves: they are true amateurs and most of them are really quite beautiful. That depends on a bit of a subjective assessment of course since most of the models are Caucasian, young (18-22) and fairly petite. The porn itself is very good, if somewhat formulaic. Most of the scenes follow the same formula of interview, blowjob with the model clothed, some sex in specific positions, more oral, usually more sex and finally finishing with the guy jerking off on the modelís face as she kneels in front of him.

There are currently close to 300 scenes available and the site does update. I canít be specific about the update schedule because the scenes aren't dated but it appears that at least one new scene is added per week.

The scenes are available in streaming at resolutions called high, medium, low and mobile. The downloads are available in 720x405, 1280x720 and mobile. Paying for a premium membership adds downloads in 1920x1280 and 4K on the newer scenes. I downloaded the 1280x720 versions and they come in at 6000 kb/s and 29fps. They look good on a 24Ē monitor and 50Ē TV.

Where things start to fall apart for the site is the site design itself. Describing the issues that the site has seems a bit overwhelming because there are just so many but Iíll hit the highlights:
ē The models aren't named and there is no biography given
ē The scenes have no unique identifier at all. Iíve read on other forums where members will refer to a scene by a shoot number but Iíve never seen any unique information for a scene.
ē Scenes canít be opened in a new tab so you have to open them in your main browser window, but when you click to go back you get taken to the first page again and have to re-select the page you were on. To make matters worse, when you do finally get back to the page you just left the eight thumbnails are all in different order. I ended up downloading several scenes more than once.
ē Only eight anal scenes.

The membership options aren't simple either. In the past you were required to stay for a second month to download HD files but now you can just pay to get the additional access immediately. I opted for the base membership because Iím happy with the 1280x720 files but to access the behind-the-scenes and Ďdeletedí scenes you need pay the additional amount. I figured it would be worth it but there are only 38 BTS scenes and five deleted scenes.

The site bills through Epoch or CC Bill so you can join with confidence that your information will be secure and you can cancel easily.

The site had some of the fastest download speeds that Iíve seen from porn sites. It was rare for me to see less that 20MB/s and most times I was seeing 25MB/s. I downloaded a lot in my first few days and if there is a download limit (which I donít think there is) itís high enough that only a serious porn glutton would hit it.

So is it worth joining or not? The site itself is deeply flawed and could be easily improved; the improvements would be like picking low-hanging fruit so that leads me to the conclusion that the site owners aren't really interested in improving things. To be fair to the site owners though, they might be putting their efforts into recruiting the models. The models are really the true value of this site: most of them are true amateurs and are really good looking. They appear to be having fun too. So when I balance the good and the bad I have to give this site a cautious recommendation: the porn is very good but the site is very bad. But, if you go into the deal with your eyes open armed with knowledge of the flaws youíll be okay. Unless you absolutely must have HD or 4K or have a big thing for BTS or deleted scenes you can save yourself some money and take only the basic membership. So the recommendation is a definite maybe. I likely wonít rejoin and hereís something Iíve never done in a review before; Iíll suggest a better alternative: you can get very similar porn on a much better site at Exploited College Girls.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

View All:  New Reviews

New Comments

Latest 3 user comments in this niche.

Visit Porn Mastermind

1. Porn Mastermind (1)

Network
Goldfish (67) 08-22-15  10:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)

Lack of new content

I join this site at least once a year. I noticed there wasn't much new content this time around.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Reality Kings

2. Reality Kings (2)

Network
exotics4me (463) 08-18-15  03:19am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)

Much clearer download limit

I joined Reality Kings a few days ago for the first time in several years. After nearly downloading the entire, Moms Bang Teens site, I received the message saying I had exceeded my 24 hours download limit. They even have a full explanation of what you can download every 24 hours.

You can download 50 "full" scenes. These are the biggest scenes on the site. The HD versions are in the 2-3 GB range, I didn't download those though. I just downloaded the full scenes in 480p.

You can download 100 "clips" in 24 hours and 300 "one minute clips".

I think this is a lot better than the old 10 GB per day limit, if for no other reason, it's explained clearly now. My folder for the previous 24 hours has right at 20 GB in it. I should be able to get most everything I want.

The numbers add up to 30 days at 50 full scenes per day = 1,500 scenes in a month.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Old Farts Young Tarts

3. Old Farts Young Tarts (0)

Pay
LPee23 (24) 08-16-15  03:06pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)

Site down?

Redirecting to BeautyandtheSenior.com now. Wonder if it is down for good? Anyway, glad I got all their peeing scenes already ;-)

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


View All:  New Comments


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Related Niches
1. Anal (4)
2. Cum Shots (4)
3. Gangbangs (2)
4. Group Sex (1)
5. Extreme (0)

View All : Niches


Hardcore @ TBP
1. 21Sextury.com 92.0
2. 21 Sextreme 91.5
3. Porn Pros Net... 91.0
4. Dog Fart Netw... 90.0
5. Pix and Video 89.0
6. My XXX Pass 89.0
7. Hustler 86.0
8. Killer Gram 86.0
9. Hustler Mega ... 84.5
10. 18 Passport 83.0
11. Private.com 83.0
12. Pack Of Porn 83.0
13. I Have A Wife 83.0
14. Premium Pass 82.0
15. Massage Creep 82.0

View All : Hardcore Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.96 seconds.