Hardcore Sex Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 3 reviews. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Spoiled Virgins (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to a total of 28 sites.
+They've got a very good selection of popular young European performers.
+Content is dated and they appear to update with 2-3 new scenes per month.
+You can download all the phototsets in a single zip file and resolution is 1200x800.
+Navigation from site to site is usually about two clicks of the mouse.
+You can see all of the videos a model has by looking at the bottom of her video page.
+Most of the models have at least one video on some of the other sites. |
| Cons: |
-You get 28 sites but only 6 of those are still updating. All of the others stopped updating 3 or more years ago.
-The performers name are not the ones they are normally known under.
-The use of HD isn't helping in the quality of the videos since you see all the skin blemishes, pimples and razor burns. |
| Bottom Line: |
*The setup of this site is that it tries to make the viewers believe that all the girls are true virgins and that this is their first sexual experience. They fail miserably at it because the acting is not very good, all of the girls are well known European performers and whenever they have a doctor to verify that the girl still has her hymen then he or she comes into the room already wearing a complete surgery outfit with a mask on their face. They currently have 215 videos(only about 12 are HD) so this makes it the second biggest site of the ones that are still updating.
*I think I saved about one or two videos from this site because the virgin gimmick doesn't do much for me. I might have a different idea if the dialogue was in English and the acting was a little better but I doubt it. The choice of models, the setup and everything else would have to be changed for me to get interested and this is not something these guys appear able to do.
*I guess that if you care more about the idea that the girls might be virgins and you can overlook bad acting and a mediocre setup then you might enjoy the content on this site. The others that might enjoy the site are those that want to collect all the content a certain model has done. If that's the case and you collect European models then you have to join this site.
**If the above do nothing for you then stay away from this site. You mnight find one of their other site more to your interest.** |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Teeny Pass (1)
Network |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- This is the main access page to a pretty large network of young adult sites. (check out my older review on Casting couch teens for more details about my favorite site in the network)
- In total across all sites you get around 2500 exclusive movies and another 1500 or so scenes from other sites and DVD's
- Some very very cute girls, a lot of unknown girls and some pretty realistic sex scenes along with some of the best pre-sex interviews I've seen.
- Mostly regular sex, a handful of threesomes and no anal, DP or any other crazy stuff.
- Scenes have images to go along, but no zip files
- Easy navigation and streaming works well.
- No technical issues over the past 3 years when I've been a member on and off. It's always easy to cancel, no hidden fees, no log-outs or site down issues. |
| Cons: |
- No recent updates. The archive is there and I always find some videos I missed before, but as far as I can tell the entire network is dead.
- The big downside of the entire network is the quality of the video and images. The highest video size offered is 480x360 and none of the images have zip archives.
- The web design is stuck in the late 90's with no model search features, no way to navigate all the scenes available on all network sites and generally just a old fashioned feel to it (strange cartoons in the banners of the sites, especially for Horny Spanish fly...)overall the whole network just feels like it had better days.
- They have a daily download limit that doesn't allow you to download more than a handful of videos (I believe this is a recent development, but it's very disheartening) |
| Bottom Line: |
I like to join this network every 6 months of so, every time hoping that things have improved since I last visited, sadly that is not the case. This network is old and shows it's age: videos have poor resolution, web design is very basic and the scenes remind one of the lighting and style of the 90's. That being said, I still join every once in a while so there is some reason to give these sites a second look.
The big bonus of the network is that the girls are all very cute (they have Lexi Belle, Sandy Sweet, Proxy Paige along with a bunch of girls I've never heard off but they all look incredible) and the action while pretty standard is interesting enough. Almost all sites follow the formula of either an interview with the girl then a standard sex scene or the guys drive around and find a girl stranded for some reason in a parking lot. They give her a ride, we get to hear some ridiculous story and then we get about 20 minutes of sex.
The formula is pretty standard, and even sites dedicated to blow jobs like the big swallow of big league facials follow this trend with a healthy dose of interview and regular sex thrown in for good measure.
Overall I'd say that despite the names and supposed different focuses of the sites pretty much all scenes in this network could have been on one site. Even the ethnic focused sites like Spanish fly feature several girls that could be at home on any other area of the network. When you join you basically get around 2500 scenes that are very similar and pretty standard.
Now, that being said the guys behind this network got the formula down to an art. The models are all incredibly hot and I have yet to see an awkward or uncomfortable interview. Even if the girl is shy at first within a few minutes she is giggling and seems at ease. Even better at no point do the director or male actor seem disrespectful or insulting. All scenes look and feel like fun, classic porn.
If I'd have to compare the network to anything exploited college girls comes to mind, but I'd say the average model on here is a lot more attractive and experienced, making for some very hot videos.
That's the good part. The models and the directors involved. The downside is pretty much everything else from the poor video quality to the download limits that make it almost impossible to get all the videos you want during one or two membership cycles. Add to that the lack of recent updates and the network looses a lot of points.
What it comes down to is a preference choice, are realistic interviews and hot models that you probably haven't seen on the other big networks worth putting up with the technical downsides? For me the action is often more arousing than an insane DP, but with so many choices out there it's hard to truly recommend this network.
If you're on the fence about joining I'd recommend checking out videobox where they have several (if not all) of the teeny bopper club scenes. That way you can get a feel for the kind of scenes you'd be getting here with basically no risk (videobox will most definitely have something that is worth the 9 bucks subscription fee.) |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. X-Art (6)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The girls here are all absolutely beautiful. If you like Met-Art or FemJoy, you will also really like this site. Although many of the same girls are here, most of them seem a little less inhibited and this is the only place I've seen were so many of them agreed to do sex scenes. Most sets include both images and videos (listed separately under each model's profile) and the videos are not just video of the photo session, they are all well done, dedicated videos. Both images and videos are some of the best quality I have seen on any site. The girls are natural, trimmed or shaved, and solid 9s on the combo body-face scale. Every image and every video is high quality, with no older shoots or videos to dissappoint. Even the music selection and timing in the videos seems well done. |
| Cons: |
Well...yes, there could be a little more content. The site, it seems, has only been around since 2008 or so. But in the balance between really good imagery and volume, I'm pretty happy here. I couldn't find a single set or even an image in a set that was just added to create filler. Quality beats quantity every time in this case. For the money, the site is well worth it. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a VERY well done site. The photographers and videographers do a spectacular job of focusing on the girls..and I don't just mean keeping them in focus. The sets, lighting and overall environment combine to create exceptional imagery. The videos seem pretty genuine and there are some really excellent videos both of solo girls, couple and girl-girl scenes. They've managed to tap every single exceptional European and American model. Go look at the model list and you may recognize many of the girls. Most are among the most beautiful in the industry. And, as I said, the crew here brings out the best in them...in every single set. Several of the models look far, far better than I've ever seen them on other sites. Perhaps it is, judging from the fact that many of the sets are in the sun or on an island someplace, that it seems these folks have a decent budget and can afford to take the models someplace really fun for the shoots.
Navigation on the site is good, allowing you to list by update, model names or model rankings. Downloads are fast. Image selection once in a set is good. Select the image size you want, click on the images tab and then any image you click on will open in the size selcted. You can then choose larger or smaller from within each image page (nice feature). Zips are available in several sizes, usually up to 2500x4000 pixels.
The images are all focused, lit and cropped nicely with no odd or distorted angles, giant panoramas or distractions in the images. Perhaps the only personal thing is that there is a slight shortage of images showing the entire model in a natural position (i.e. without the legs or feet cropped). I'm not a foot fetishist, but I do think several complete images of each model once she is undressed would be nice.
If you have been to to the top-tier photography sites like Femjoy, Met-art, Met-Models, Errotica-Archive, Earl Miller, Ron Harris, etc., then you owe it to yourself to check out X-art. If it isn't among the top-tier sites now, I sincerely believe it should and will be soon. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
 Niche RSS Feeds |
|
|
| You may need to copy the links above to your favorite RSS reader (like Google Reader). |
|
