Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Niche - Amateur The category portal for a specific niche.

Amateur Girls Reviews & Comments

Top Sites

Top rated and most active sites in the niche.

Top Rated

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. Teen Fidelity (2) 91.2
2. My Free Cams (2) 91.0
3. ATK Natural & Hairy (2) 89.0
4. Amateur Allure (2) 89.0
5. Bella Pass (2) 88.0
6. Bryci (2) 88.0
7. Exploited College Girls (2) 86.0
8. ATK Premium (2) 78.4
9. Nextdoor Models (2) 69.0
10. Ann Angel XXX (2) 67.5

Requires minimum of 2 reviews. This changes periodically.

View All: Top Rated Sites
Most Active

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. Teen Fidelity (2) 91.2
2. My Free Cams (2) 91.0
3. ATK Natural & Hairy (2) 89.0
4. Amateur Allure (2) 89.0
5. Bella Pass (2) 88.0
6. Bryci (2) 88.0
7. Exploited College Girls (2) 86.0
8. ATK Premium (2) 78.4
9. Nextdoor Models (2) 69.0
10. Ann Angel XXX (2) 67.5

Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.

View All: Most Active Sites

New Reviews

Latest 3 user reviews in this niche.

Visit Extasy Cams

1. Extasy Cams (1)

Cams
Active
90
jook (16) 12-11-14  04:48pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: * Cheap, cheap, cheap

[Just trying to make a point and probably the best reason for joining. At 49 cents a minute (if you spend $100), this is a fraction of the price of other cam sites, not that I am an aficionado of this stuff.]

* A good number of amateurs which is a plus and minus.

* Customer support is much improved. I've had several legitimate complaints about the girls over the years. I often get an apology, a credit and they kick the girl off the site.

* Mostly Eastern Europeans, Latinas and Filipinos - I never came across anyone from the US. I consider that a plus.

* A rating system that mostly works along with comments made by users. You have to take the comments with a grain of salt though, since some are bogus. But as a whole, they're helpful. There's also a 5 star rating system which is useful.

* Uses CC for credit cards - I never had an issue

* Half price specials every so often
Cons: * It is not private chat and you start paying the moment you enter the girl's room. Some models ignore you (or don't notice you're there).

* Many of the models will drag on chatting as long as possible to maximize profits, no matter what you say, i.e., TAKE IF OFF B!THCH -- just joking. I can understand that but some are unreasonable. All the while, you're paying.

* Some models will only chat and it might take 5 minutes or more to realize that.

* The majority of models are 6 or under though there are 9+'s on there also.

* I've heard that management is late with payments to the models and is not a primary concern of theirs. This is an unsubstantiated rumor. The women only get half, the site gets the other half. And they get less if they're going through a sponsor's computer, which seems to be common. The low payments to the models may affect the quality of women and explain why there are no Americans.
Bottom Line: To be clear, the high score given by me is based on both value and quality. If I had to break it down, it would be 100 for value and 70 for quality.

This site is modeled differently than other sites and I think it works. With other sites, at least the ones I'm aware of, you get to chat with the model before entering the room and start paying. But it's difficult to chat with a model when there are umpteen other people trying to do the same. There could be a dozen or so guys chatting along with you.

On Extasy, you go right into the room and start paying. Since it doesn't seem to be a very popular site, the models are often alone or with one other person. This is particularly true at off times, i.e., not the weekend. You generally get the same interaction here when you enter as you would if you entered a room in another site. The drawback of course, is that you don't have the opportunity before you start paying to judge the model. All in all, I think the system works as long as you keep in mind you're paying from the moment you enter the room and you take a few moments to look at the rating and reviews of the model.

I've been a member of this site for many years. I don't use it very much cuz as I said, cams aren't really my thing. So bear in mind, I am not all that familiar with the competition. However, I do enjoy it every so often. Usually, $100 worth of minutes will last a month or two or more.

Before entering a room, you get photos to look at and a quick live blurb. There's also a description written by the models which should be completely ignored. Many of them just use the same one the girl who occupies the room during the other shift uses. The best indicator if a model is good is the number of stars that users have given her and how many ratings she has. You get all this info before entering. For example, if someone has 5 stars and has only 1 rating, it's meaningless. It could be the sponsor who gave her the star. But if she's got 4 stars and 20 or more ratings, than you're chances are excellent of having a good experience.

I have mostly good things to say about my experience. I've come to understand the ratings which minimizes my chances of having a bad experience. I also have a rule of thumb that I give the woman no more than 5 minutes to show me she's serious. However, sometimes I don't mind just chatting and getting little exposure. I figure for the price, it's not a big deal.

I notice that many cam sites charge upwards of $1/minute. I would constantly be watching the clock if I was paying that. Here, I don't worry about it so much.

There is also the option of tipping (in minutes). Some models are aggressive about it saying they'll only do such and such for a tip. Mostly though, I rarely get asked for a tip though I make it a habit to leave one if deserved.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Streamate.com

2. Streamate.com (1)

Cams
Newbie
90*
Jeff1987 (0) 12-10-14  01:03pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: slick and easy-to-use interface
lots of performers online at all times
high-quality HD cams
Cons: some expensive cams
Watch out for Fake Cam-girls, they won't do what you ask them to do and you can easily tell its a recorded vid that loops
Bottom Line: Streamate is an excellent cam site. Besides the high-quality cams and variety of performers, the prices are generally decent and the various options (many performers have sound and cam2cam options) provide a complete experience. Serious cam-girl fans need an account here and any beginners should start here in order to appreciate what a great experience a cam site can be.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Melissa Pass

3. Melissa Pass (1)

Network
Active
60
rearadmiral (340) 12-08-14  03:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Five sites of four good-looking amateurs
- Supports download managers
- Bills through CC Bill
Cons: - Site is dated
- Videos low resolution
- Most videos are broken into parts even though theyíre very small
- Photos not available in zips
- Undated uploads but doesnít appear to be updating
Bottom Line: I joined this small network based on the tour pages and the sample videos that I was able to download and watch. The problem with this approach is that I figured that the size and resolution of the videos were low and small precisely because they were previews. After joining the site I learned that the quality in the memberís pages was no better.

I joined primarily because the sites in the network seemed to have a public nudity theme and thatís a niche Iím interested in. For fans of that genre there is a fair bit here but the networkís shortcomings likely outweigh any advantages. To be fair, this is some decent public nudity. Where it loses marks in my measure is that they trade off brazenness for heat. Val, for example, makes a lot out of her arrest and 30 days in jail for public nudity and then flaunts that by wearing pasties and panties that match her skin tone to attract more police attention. There isn't a lot of sexual heat in those shoots.

There is some girl/girl and very little boy/girl (oral only) so donít join expecting to see these models in hardcore action.

The network has five sites but one of them is a cam site and I didnít check it out. Iím not really into those and I donít want to risk additional charges for something I donít want. So this review is of the four solo girl sites on the network. The four models are all young, petite and attractive. They all have a wholesome look popular in many amateur models. The girls and their sites are:

ē Val Midwest Ė 45 videos and photo sets
ē Melissa Midwest Ė 40 videos and 96 photo sets
ē Foxy Jacky Ė 20 videos and 76 photo sets
ē Sweet Adri Ė 12 videos and 79 photo sets

The site has some fairly serious flaws for both video and photo collectors. For video collectors the biggest drawbacks will be the low resolutions used and the fact that even short videos tend to be broken into parts. The highest resolutions I saw were 720x480 which are marginal at best. But when you consider that some of these videos have bitrates below 1000kb/s those are well below current standards. The best of the videos arenít that good and the worst are badly pixilated. Some of the videos are 640x480.

I canít give you photo guys much information here. I donít normally collect photos but I certainly donít if I have to download them one at a time. Yes, this site doesnít offer zipped photosets.

You may be thinking that the reason for these problems is that these videos and pictures were made many years ago. Thatís a fair question but since one model has videos and photos of her 2013 appearance in Hustler magazine it seems that the site does have newer content. Much of the material here could be older though based on a comment that exotics4me made in 2013 about having been a member there Ďyears ago.í

I canít provide any clear answer on whether any of the sites updates or not as they donít date any of the uploads. Iíve been a member less than a week and my plan is to cancel my membership today and not bother going back. Even if there were new uploads the resolutions are so low as to not have me too interested in getting them. The good news about cancelling is that the site bills through CC Bill so that wonít be a problem. My educated guess, however, is that none of the sites are updating on any regular schedule.

The site supports download managers but the file sizes are so small that they arenít really needed.

I canít say if this will be an issue with other users and Iíll be cancelling my membership and have no reason to go back, but while it is true that you get access to 5 sites with your network membership you must sign in through the site you joined through. Once in that site you have access to all the sites. What I donít know is if the content on the additional sites is limited in any way. I have no way to check that.

If you do choose to join youíll note that they offer a three-month membership. My advice is to avoid that. I downloaded 90% of the videos from the four girlís sites in less than an hour.

The bottom line is that unless you must have photos and videos from these specific models youíre best to spend your porn dollars elsewhere. The monthly fee is $30 and thatís very high for what you get. The models are hot, and there is definitely some interesting stuff for fans of public nudity, but the videos are too low resolution to have any real collectable value. And if you need the photos be prepared for a lot of clicking on your mouse. My advice is that if youíre interested you should consider this carefully: itís a lot of money for some not-very-good porn.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

View All:  New Reviews

New Comments

Latest 3 user comments in this niche.

Visit Amateur Allure

1. Amateur Allure (2)

Pay
2 Free K (11) 12-17-14  11:20pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)

Slowly became 'Dick Allure'.

These guys need to zoom out.

This site has a lot going for it: hot girls, hot outfits, great blowjobs. But the camerawork ruins the potential. Over the years, the camera has focused more and more on dick. Often, the top of the girl's head is cut off while the full dick is in the shot. Why get these girls all dolled-up then leave them out of the shots?

To put it another way: I want to see a hot girl sucking dick; not just a dick getting sucked.

Also, the camera moves around like Blair Witch Project. Sometimes, the chick is sideways, no joke.

It used to not be this way at Am Allure. The older scenes were HOT. But then the cameraman got an ego.

Please, AmAllure: zoom out, quit the fussy editing and angle changes, and let us see these beautiful women!

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Galleria

2. ATK Galleria (0)

Pay
2 Free K (11) 12-17-14  10:48pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)

Beware - server constantly offline.

These guys need to fix their server issues pronto or just close up shop. It's as simple as that.

They keep saying it's DDOS attacks, but honestly, after the Nth time - why should we care? Just fix the problem.

If Wendy's never has fries, but always has a good excuse, at some point I'll just give up on Wendy's, right?

Usually, behind such problems lie greater problems. Maybe a management change has resulted in less spending on security?

Potential subscribers - consider yourselves warned.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Club Sweethearts

3. Club Sweethearts (0)

Pay
Monahan (42) 12-15-14  05:37pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)

It's About Time

I'm happy to see that reason prevailed with the management of this website by creating a much better site name that won't attract the authorities.

As I said in another post, I was unwilling to have a porn site that calls itself Club Seventeen on my computer in any form. While it's very unlikely that my computer would ever be taken from me and searched by the authorities, can you imagine how hard it would be to convince them that Club seventeen does not contain child pornography. Child porn includes any person younger than 18 years who appears nude and/or in sexual situations.

Cloning the Club Seventeen site into a more generic name like Club Sweetheart was the right thing to do.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


View All:  New Comments


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Related Niches
1. Solo Models (56)
2. Young Adults (36)
3. Webcams (6)
4. Non-Nude (0)
5. Swingers (0)

View All : Niches


Amateur @ TBP
1. abbywinters 93.5
2. Girls Out Wes... 88.5
3. I Feel Myself 88.0
4. Yanks.com 87.0
5. Suicide Girls 87.0
6. Karup's PC 86.5
7. Homegrown Vid... 86.0
8. Petites Paris... 86.0
9. ATK Exotics 86.0
10. PJ Girls 86.0
11. ChickPass Net... 85.5
12. Karup's Homet... 85.5
13. ALS Angels 85.0
14. ChickPass Ama... 85.0
15. Teen Fidelity 85.0

View All : Amateur Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.6 seconds.