Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Niche - Amateur The category portal for a specific niche.

Amateur Girls Reviews & Comments

Top Sites

Top rated and most active sites in the niche.

Top Rated

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. Teen Fidelity (2) 90.0
2. Chaturbate (2) 88.8

Requires minimum of 2 reviews. This changes periodically.

View All: Top Rated Sites
Most Active

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. Teen Fidelity (2) 90.0
2. Chaturbate (2) 88.8
3. Haze Her (1) 95.0
4. Karup's Hometown Amateurs (1) 94.0
5. ATK Exotics (1) 94.0
6. Elli Nude (1) 93.0
7. ATK Natural & Hairy (1) 93.0
8. My Free Cams (1) 91.0
9. Faith 69 (1) 90.0
10. Trike Patrol (1) 90.0

Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.

View All: Most Active Sites

New Reviews

Latest 3 user reviews in this niche.

Visit Chaturbate

1. Chaturbate (2)

Cams
Active
91
Marcus (47) 08-16-15  09:56am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Includes hardcore cam shows
- You can enjoy it for free
- Typically cheaper than MFC
- Models can set their own private rate-per-minute
- Easy to see which models you follow are online
- More refined than MFC with things like video/gallery purchases
Cons: - Some models hold back best stuff for Ďcrazy ticketí shows
- Like all cam sites can be expensive/addictive
- Some cams are poor quality
- A few shows seem to be pre-recorded
- Not as respectful community as MFC
- Not all privates can be recorded
Bottom Line: Iíve been on My Free Cams for a couple of years now, but joined Chaturbate to broaden my horizons and really love how it offers something different.

The biggest difference is that itís not just girls, but guys, transexuals and most importantly COUPLES who can chat.

This is banned on MFC, so on CB you get a lot of live hardcore action ranging from blowjobs to threesomes and everything in between. I have to say some of the modelsí talents are incredible and could hold their own against the pros.

The interface is similar to MFC in that you can filter by region, however it doesnít automatically refresh as it does on MFC, and the thumbnail update frequency isnít as good. However, one huge advantage over MFC is the Ďfollowed modelsí tab which shows thumbnails for models who are online that you follow. This makes it so much easier to browse than MFC.

Once in the rooms there are a few differences. Models can set chosen members as moderators if they wish. This means they can get on with the show rather than have to moderate too. Another difference is that models have certain plug-ins that help them run a room. These include tools to keep track of targets, tip jars, Ďcrazy ticketí shows where you can buy tokens to see a show when it is hidden etc. Many of these tools mean it can be more expensive than MFC if you arenít someone who normally tips, but I think the pros outweigh the cons here.

Another difference is that models can set their private cam rates. This is generally a good thing in that most are cheaper-per-minute that MFC. Iíve seen some models charge as little as 18tpm, and typically the most expensive is 60tpm which is the same as MFC. I have seen a couple of models charge more, though.

One big negative is that the model can also choose whether members can record private shows. This leaves one huge benefit of privates in the hands of models. When you go to start a private, it will tell you their rate and whether you can save the show or not.

All models I have encountered are polite and willing. Like MFC there can sometimes be bit of a language barrier, but itís nothing that use of animated GIF emojis canít overcome! The members on CB seem a lot less respectful than on MFC, however, and seem a lot more inclined to bark orders/instructions at models - and this is despite moderators who can mute and/or boot members out of rooms.

Overall I think I prefer Chaturbate to My Free Cams, although MFCís advantage is the sheer number of models. The interface is more refined, the content is more varied as it includes hardcore, the plug-ins models can use really make a difference and overall it is better value than MFC.

Please let me know if you need any model recommendations or have any questions.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Drone Hunter

2. Drone Hunter (1)

Pay
Active
75
rearadmiral (380) 08-10-15  11:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Mofos network
- Innovative and unique concept
- Most scenes have an outdoor theme
- TBP discount
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Small site
- Hasnít updated in four months
- Typical Mofos / Brazzers model look
- Site will log you off after an hour
Bottom Line: I suppose that with the popularity of drones it was only a matter of time before someone started using them in porn. The concept is unique and it does add to the scenes but for whatever reason the concept seems to have died since the site hasnít added a new scene since April 2015.

In all of the scenes the drone footage is just edited into footage shot by a regular camera. The one possible exception to that is the one lesbian scene which may be all drone footage. In all of the scenes the drone is played up as being surreptitious video that the female model doesnít know of.

The most common scene setup is where the male talent is bringing a girl back to his place and he contacts the Ďdrone hunterí to shoot some secret video of them having sex. There is usually some fake communication between the male talent and the drone operator. A few of the scenes use the scenario where neither the male or female talent know theyíre being viewed by the drone.

The site is quite small with only nine videos uploaded and it looks like it will stay small because it hasnít updated in months. Given that each scene has to be set up to allow access for the drone there is an outdoor or voyeur element to each scene. Perhaps that part of it caused some problems in filming. It seems reasonable to think that a drone hovering over a rooftop patio or looking in a hotel window might attract some unwanted attention. On the other hand, if you like outdoor or public scenes this site certainly has that.

The biggest advantage to the site is the fact that itís part of the Mofos network so youíll have access to a lot of other sites. Also, because Mofos is one of the leading porn sites you can expect their level of quality in the site. There are tags on the scenes but with only nine scenes that really doesnít add anything.

The downside to this being part of the Mofos network is that many of the scenes feature models with the signature Mofos/Brazzers look: big breasts (often fake) and other body mods. One of the models had enough collagen injected into her lips that she looked pretty silly, and to my eyes anyway, not very sexy.

The scenes can be streamed and downloaded. The streaming is available in three resolutions (up to 1080p) and there are six options for downloads: 272p, 368p, 480p, 720p and 1080p in MP4 format and a 480p in WMV. I downloaded the 720p and those come in at 1280x720 at 8000kb/s and 29fps. With those specs youíd expect them to look good and they do, on both a 24Ē monitor and a 50Ē TV.

I used Internet Download Manager and didnít have any issues with the links timing out. If they do time-out that happens after a reasonable delay. One annoyance is that the site itself will kick you out approximately once per hour and require that you sign in again.

I canít say that Iíd recommend this site unless you really have a thing for drones because itís just too small and looks to have gone dormant already. But if youíre interested in the site and you join the network to get it then the real value is in the network itself which has over 2000 videos available. When you consider that you get 2000 scenes for the low TBP discount price of $15USD it really is a good deal.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Girls Do Porn

3. Girls Do Porn (1)

Pay
Active
75
rearadmiral (380) 08-03-15  06:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - True amateurs
- Many stunning young models
- Nearly 300 scenes
- Multiple viewing options
- Fast downloads
- Bill through reputable billers
Cons: - Terrible site design
- Expensive if you want HD
- No model names or info
- No unique identifiers for scenes
- Site defaults back to page one
- Better porn options are available
Bottom Line: GDP is a site that reviewers either love or hate. Itís a site that has squandered its potential. The problem with the site is that it has some beautiful amateurs in some pretty good porn let down by one of the worst site layouts on the internet. If anyone can learn anything from this site itís how not to design a webpage.

The real value of the site is in the models themselves: they are true amateurs and most of them are really quite beautiful. That depends on a bit of a subjective assessment of course since most of the models are Caucasian, young (18-22) and fairly petite. The porn itself is very good, if somewhat formulaic. Most of the scenes follow the same formula of interview, blowjob with the model clothed, some sex in specific positions, more oral, usually more sex and finally finishing with the guy jerking off on the modelís face as she kneels in front of him.

There are currently close to 300 scenes available and the site does update. I canít be specific about the update schedule because the scenes aren't dated but it appears that at least one new scene is added per week.

The scenes are available in streaming at resolutions called high, medium, low and mobile. The downloads are available in 720x405, 1280x720 and mobile. Paying for a premium membership adds downloads in 1920x1280 and 4K on the newer scenes. I downloaded the 1280x720 versions and they come in at 6000 kb/s and 29fps. They look good on a 24Ē monitor and 50Ē TV.

Where things start to fall apart for the site is the site design itself. Describing the issues that the site has seems a bit overwhelming because there are just so many but Iíll hit the highlights:
ē The models aren't named and there is no biography given
ē The scenes have no unique identifier at all. Iíve read on other forums where members will refer to a scene by a shoot number but Iíve never seen any unique information for a scene.
ē Scenes canít be opened in a new tab so you have to open them in your main browser window, but when you click to go back you get taken to the first page again and have to re-select the page you were on. To make matters worse, when you do finally get back to the page you just left the eight thumbnails are all in different order. I ended up downloading several scenes more than once.
ē Only eight anal scenes.

The membership options aren't simple either. In the past you were required to stay for a second month to download HD files but now you can just pay to get the additional access immediately. I opted for the base membership because Iím happy with the 1280x720 files but to access the behind-the-scenes and Ďdeletedí scenes you need pay the additional amount. I figured it would be worth it but there are only 38 BTS scenes and five deleted scenes.

The site bills through Epoch or CC Bill so you can join with confidence that your information will be secure and you can cancel easily.

The site had some of the fastest download speeds that Iíve seen from porn sites. It was rare for me to see less that 20MB/s and most times I was seeing 25MB/s. I downloaded a lot in my first few days and if there is a download limit (which I donít think there is) itís high enough that only a serious porn glutton would hit it.

So is it worth joining or not? The site itself is deeply flawed and could be easily improved; the improvements would be like picking low-hanging fruit so that leads me to the conclusion that the site owners aren't really interested in improving things. To be fair to the site owners though, they might be putting their efforts into recruiting the models. The models are really the true value of this site: most of them are true amateurs and are really good looking. They appear to be having fun too. So when I balance the good and the bad I have to give this site a cautious recommendation: the porn is very good but the site is very bad. But, if you go into the deal with your eyes open armed with knowledge of the flaws youíll be okay. Unless you absolutely must have HD or 4K or have a big thing for BTS or deleted scenes you can save yourself some money and take only the basic membership. So the recommendation is a definite maybe. I likely wonít rejoin and hereís something Iíve never done in a review before; Iíll suggest a better alternative: you can get very similar porn on a much better site at Exploited College Girls.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

View All:  New Reviews

New Comments

Latest 3 user comments in this niche.

Visit Old Farts Young Tarts

1. Old Farts Young Tarts (0)

Pay
LPee23 (24) 08-16-15  03:06pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)

Site down?

Redirecting to BeautyandtheSenior.com now. Wonder if it is down for good? Anyway, glad I got all their peeing scenes already ;-)

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Amateur Allure

2. Amateur Allure (1)

Pay
rearadmiral (380) 08-16-15  05:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)

Update on Amateur Allure

For those who are Amateur Allure fans I thought Iíd mention that starting a few months back they changed the scene formula that they use. Some people see any formula as a negative but Iím okay with a formula if it works and in this case it did (and still does).

The old formula was the girl arrives, there is a brief chat, she drops to her knees while dressed and gives head, there is usually head in a few positions, there is sex on the couch while sheís clothed, then the guy pops in her mouth for a swallow. After that she usually got naked, there was more head, more sex and a second pop and swallow.

The new formula seems to be that there are two scenes per update now with different models. Instead of having a second scene with the same model while sheís undressed there is an entire second scene with a different model. The formula with each scene is essentially the same with head and sex while clothed followed by a pop and swallow and then on to a scene with a different model. Complete nudity is far less frequent now.

I donít dislike the new formula because it really does give a lot more value in getting two distinct scenes per weekly update but I do prefer the old formula. I have a thing for clothed male/nude female scenes and Amateur Allure had been a good site for seeing this but is less so now. Itís still a favourite site of mine, but now just a little bit less so.

In a recent update the male talent (and site owner) noted that they were filming in 4K but that hasnít translated to uploads yet.

If I have one complaint about the site itís that they donít offer a discount to recurring members. The site is expensive at $40USD per month for four updates (and more so for us Canadians at $50CDN since our petro-dollar is tanking on low crude prices) so I join a few times a year when it is a fair value. But if the site offered a discount for a continuing membership Iíd likely just stay forever.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Dreams

3. Teen Dreams (0)

Pay
Vito (0) 08-12-15  02:26pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

content

Don't bother with this site. Most, if not all, recent contents are from amkingdom, twistys, teenmegaworld, etc etc.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


View All:  New Comments


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Related Niches
1. Young Adults (24)
2. Solo Models (16)
3. Webcams (4)
4. Non-Nude (1)
5. Swingers (0)

View All : Niches


Amateur @ TBP
1. abbywinters 93.5
2. AT Kingdom Ne... 89.0
3. Girls Out Wes... 88.5
4. I Feel Myself 88.0
5. Suicide Girls 87.0
6. Yanks.com 87.0
7. ATK Exotics 86.5
8. Karup's PC 86.5
9. Petites Paris... 86.0
10. Homegrown Vid... 86.0
11. PJ Girls 86.0
12. ChickPass Ama... 86.0
13. ChickPass Net... 85.5
14. Karup's Homet... 85.5
15. ALS Angels 85.0

View All : Amateur Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.36 seconds.