1. Public Flash (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Newer videos 720x480, many older ones 640x480.
-Nice archive, presently 117 video shoots.
-Many natural, attractive girls who seem to really enjoy flashing. Most of them are very enthusiastic.
-Attractive price through the link from TBP.
-Member forum. Provides news about future updates and you can post suggestions and comments. |
| Cons: |
-Many videos do not have photo shoots and many photo shoots do not have videos.
-Videos do not have a link to download the entire video at once. In the member forum the webmaster recently promised to add a link.
-Updates may take as long as two weeks for an entire shoot. Updates a few clips at a time.
-Photos cannot be downloaded as a zip file. Many photos poor quality. Apparantly not adding new photo shoots.
-May not be all exclusive as the main photographer has videos on other flashing websites.
-Bonus sites streaming only with poor quality videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
Most of the videos were a lot of fun and better than I expected. I counted three with oral sex and a few with a little masturbation, so not only skin. A lot of the videos were quite explicit. A variety of races and ethnicities as well as body types, although most were thin. Most appear to be amateurs, although the shoot of Hannah Hilton was good. I would definitely sign up again in a few months. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Homemade Paysite (7)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Genuine amateur content.
Girls are good looking.
Videos are available for download in many different options.
Counted 56 exclusive movies on the site.
A few bonus movies to sift through as well.
Updates are pretty regular. Not on a set schedule, but at least 8-10 a month with a lot of videos.
Variety of scene types. |
| Cons: |
Picture sets are just a hodge podge of pics, not separated by scene.
No vidaps for the movies.
Site design and navigation could use an overhaul.
Scene location tends to be the same bed. Not a big deal to me, but perhaps to some it could be monotonous.
Not a huge variety of girls. |
| Bottom Line: |
First point to make: My score is reflective of comparing this site to other similar amateur sites. I am not making the score of 88 be equal to a score of 88 I would give for a massive full blown site such as Karups, ATK, or 1by-day, as I believe that it would be unfair to compare them side by side in that way.
This is a pretty good site overall and I'm glad I joined for the change of pace. There have been a few other true amateur sites I've joined over the years and most of them are fairly horrendous. Was curious about this site after seeing the high ratings and ultimately decided to join after seeing Penelope was in it a lot. I find her VERY sexy, so that pushed me over the edge to join and I'm glad I did. On to some facts:
1. The girls here seem to really enjoy what they are doing. From what we're led to believe, and seems legit, they are a group of female friends who just wanted to start a website together. Good for us I say. Perhaps the flip side of the coin is that you're basically going to be seeing the same few girls over and over in the scenes. If you're attracted to them that's fine, but if not, then you may want to pass.
2. The movies are good quality, and you can download them in mpeg, wmv, and higher quality wmv files. The DL speeds are decent, and I averaged around 400 kbps. Not blazing, but definitely better than others where I'm under 200 kbps. The movies are typically pretty enjoyable to watch, and there is some variety as well ranging from solo masturbation scenes, lesbian content, hardcore, and pov blowjobs. There is also a fetish menu with random vids of, well, fetishy stuff. I believe the addition of some screencaps for the videos would benefit the site, as currently you only have 1 pic to represent the whole video.
2. Picture section needs organizing. Currently there are 15 "sets" of pics but they are not what you would typically think of when it comes to a set. Once inside a set it's just random pics, they are not organized according to scene or anything. If you're looking for something in particular it would be inconvenient.
3. Girls are good looking, at least in my opinion. I read the review of the other who labeled them poorly, so that's why I preface the statement as an opinion. Judge for yourself based on the preview area, but it's hard for me to think many would be turned off by them, that's for sure.
4. Updates are very frequent for an amateur site, at least from my experience with others. And of course all the content is exclusive so that's good.
One of the better amateur sites I've joined, and based on other's reviews it seems my opinions are shared for the most part. It's pretty cool to see these girls getting this thing going and running it on their own for the most part. At least, that's what I believe the deal is. It's also nice to see the interest they have in their members, Penelope posting here is an example of that. Keep up the good work girls |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Exploited College Girls (2)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Easy navigation, well labeled update schedules, no hidden costs, real amateurs, and a solid amount of back cataloged updates are all excellent pros about this site. It is just ok and could really be something outstanding in the future. |
| Cons: |
I was very irritated to see the same woman repeated in certain updates with very little difference in the scenes. All the scenes follow the same formula which gets boring. It goes talk, toys, bj, standing on the side of the bed, doggie, anal, facial. I agree with other reviewers except I also find that the male actor is blurred out. I'm not annoyed about the guy needing the blur but it does become distracting, especially when it appears/disappears over the girls naughty parts simply because they dont know how to shoot the video from better angles and it takes me out of the moment watching the video. Would like there to be other males doing the fucking (for variety) and would like to see some creativity to the updates/girls/locations/camera angles/positions. |
| Bottom Line: |
Its great for about a month, or until you get bored. If you like the girls on the update pages a little bit its not worth it, if you think they are really hot then it is. This site feels like it is made for the man doing the fucking, he is doing the exploiting, filming, talking, everything, and it would be interesting if they brought back girls to get degraded more/worse if they are updated/featured again, or if the guy made faces about the girls behind there backs, or fucked in a different location then that one bed, and maybe without showing the lighting equipment in the background. I like the pro/am style but it gets boring after the two months that I've been a member. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
