Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Exploited College Girls

Exploited College Girls (0)

bestimmt (2) 11-10-12  02:00pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - New, fresh, beautiful women.

- High quality video.

- Long videos with LOTS of sex.

- Videos contain a large degree of variety - different sex acts (blowjobs, vaginal, anal) and lots of different angles.
Cons: - Most videos force these poor women to lick - for a long time - this disgusting guy's disgusting butt-hole. I don't know who finds that sexy, but I think it is absolutely disgusting. Gross.

- The male "talent," (i.e. prop) who is also the camera guy, talk throughout the entire video. And not what you'd expect like asking the girl to talk about herself, etc. They ask stupid questions like "does that feel good?", "am I better than your boyfriend?" and "have you ever had one that big before?" It is constant and is a complete distraction and turn-off. Its gotten to the point where I have to completely mute the videos to watch them or I can't stomach it. Recently, they started using a new prop, whose voice is not quite so whiny, nasal and annoying as the guy who used to do this before, but the new prop still won't shut up and its a big problem.

- Site navigation is very difficult. 5 or so videos per page, in date order, that's it.
Bottom Line: This site's (lone) redeeming quality is, without a doubt, the girls. They are new, they are young, and they are beautiful. Usually I have never seen them before, or this is the first time I've seen them and I see them again later on. They do a lot of different sex acts (more on this later), sometimes do anal, etc. (The people who complain that the anal is not sexy because the girl is in obvious pain are absolutely correct. I like anal but I completely avoid it on this site).

There are two major problems with this site that make it not worth the $35 to join - first, the constant inane talking out of the male prop. As I mentioned before, its comments like "is that a big dick?" and "tell me you're my little whore". The talking is constant and appears designed to stroke the performers' fragile egos rather than designed to contribute to the video. Originally, they had a guy doing all the videos who not only talked CONSTANTLY, but had the single most annoying voice on the planet. Thankfully, they seem to have replaced him (no doubt after constant complaints from members), but the new guy, while he does not have as annoying of a voice, is no better in the constant blathering department.

But the one thing that drives me absolutely nuts about the videos is these guys' obsession with their own ass holes. I am convinced they are actually homosexuals (not that there's anything wrong with that). The video will be going along nicely, and then all of a sudden, out of the middle of nowhere, its "lick my ass hole baby." Disgusting. Absolutely disgusting. Not to mention degrading to these women. And it lasts a LONG time too - its not just one lick and they're done - no - "more," "stick your tongue in there, baby." How these beautiful models can allow themselves to be subjected to sticking their tongues inside the butt hole of a disgusting guy is beyond me. I hope they're getting paid piles and piles of money for this. This absolutely ruins their videos for me. I mean, if it were in one predictable place, you could at least know to fast forward through it - not that that would redeem the fact that they do it. But it appears at random and there is no way to predict when you're going to get a long, detailed close up of man anus and scrotum. Without this act in their videos, I give the web site a 75. This just ruins it for me - there are no redeeming qualities to this despicable act. I feel so sorry for the models who are subjected to these animals.

Lastly, as others have pointed out but it merits repeating, these guys are chicken to have their faces shown on camera (of course, no problem putting the women on camera, but you get their faces in the shot and they run screaming like little girls). This severely limits the angles (its pov/mounted camera shot, so the angles are already severely limited). While I think they do an ok job editing the videos together, it is still a problem.

All in all, the videos are long, lots of sex, and the quality is decent. But, the incessant talking and the lengthy close ups of disgusting hairy man anus ruin it completely. Not worth the money and I would not recommend spending your hard-earned money on a membership to this train wreck of a web site.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Claypaws (44)
What you describe is certainly not something I would ever want to see. I would be equally disgusted. However, surely the clue is in the title of the website. What else would you expect from a site with such a name?
11-10-12  02:34pm

Reply To Message


bestimmt (2) REPLY TO #1 - Claypaws :

A decent point, for sure. But to tell you the truth, names are exaggerated all over the internet, and I certainly did not expect to see a girl licking a guy's butt when I joined. Wish I'd known!
11-10-12  03:45pm

Reply To Message


Claypaws (44)
REPLY TO #2 - bestimmt :

I agree about exaggerated site names. But I took a browse around the tour of Exploited College Girls. There are previews of many of the models there. Every preview that I read mentioned licking a man's ass, e.g. Kelli (Zoey Kush), April (Avril Hall). So it should not be a surprise.

Also, I recognise very many of the girls on the site although they have different names here from their more usual aliases. Some of them might have appeared here first but I doubt that is true of many of them. If it is any consolation to you, most of them appear in other hardcore too and they are rather good actresses. Models do not usually do things that they do not want to, especially the good-looking ones who can work easily.

So, although I would not like the content of the site and I do not like exploitation of models, even when it is simulated and consensual, I think that it is unfair to criticise the site for what it shows. To me, its tour is comprehensive enough to make its content clear.

It is difficult to give a site a rating which differs greatly from one's personal like or dislike of it but I feel that a rating should be based on how well a site achieves what its tour describes.

11-11-12  02:00am

Reply To Message


littlejoe (23) you probably should have done the site tour 1st because every complaint you have is very obvious from the tour. its like buying a 23" tv and then giving it a bad review saying its not 40"
11-11-12  07:02am

Reply To Message


slutty (111) Interesting review,

I agree with your opinion of the ass licking, and I also made the same mistake you did, but more importantly the camerwork here was shit and the mosaic over the guy's face is just stupid.

11-26-12  11:36pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.