Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : turboshaft (24)  

Feedback:   All (636)  |   Reviews (11)  |   Comments (13)  |   Replies (612)

Other:   Replies Received (227)  |   Trust Ratings (42)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 51-75 of 227 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
N/A REPLY TO #12 from Monahan: (turboshaft's Reply)

Given the quality of the makeup job and her attire, I'm guessing she was on her way to a shoot nearby.

When she left the Starbucks, she was walking with two other babes (not nearly as attractive but also well made up) in the direction of a rather staid looking high rise office building. The Starbucks has a large parking area so I have a hunch there may be a studio buried somewhere in that building and they were killing time waiting for the stunt dick to arrive.


08-19-11  08:02am

Reply
52
N/A REPLY TO #15 from lk2fireone: (turboshaft's Reply)

There was a federal law passed recently that requires all ISPs to keep a record for one year plus on all accounts. That record is basically freely available to law enforcement agencies in the investigation of criminal activity. So your complete browsing history is basically available to law enforcement, in case they want to investigate you or any group you might be related to.

The "supposed justification" of the new law was this was a measure against child porn. But all ISPs are required to keep a complete record of all clients' internet activity, with bank account and credit card payment history, as well.


08-13-11  07:45pm

Reply
53
Visit ALS Angels

ALS Angels
(0)
Reply of turboshaft's Comment from Monahan:

Turboshaft, I'm giving serious thought to taking the plunge on a 3 month membership to ALSScans, especially after reading rearadmiral's review of ALSScans today.

The ALSScans site has been on my bucket list for years but I'm tiring of the suck, fuck and jerk stuff and want to return to my real interest, looking at superbly attractive models in professionally produced videos while enjoying themselves.

Can you tell from the site if ALSAngels is still available at the $9.95 add-on price and if that deal is permanent with longer term memberships?


08-07-11  09:57pm

Reply
54
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(2)
REPLY TO #7 from messmer: (turboshaft's Reply)

"Of course, in ALS' case they can all come back!"

Oh, yeah!! :-)


08-07-11  07:24pm

Reply
55
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(2)
REPLY TO #5 from messmer: (turboshaft's Reply)

Turboshaft, my sincerest apologies. I never realized that I had failed to respond to your question. I just came across it today as I looked in on the site because of a new review. And four months later: The BTS selection process was published after the fact so I don't think there was any voting! :-)

08-07-11  01:59pm

Reply
56
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(2)
REPLY TO #4 from messmer: (turboshaft's Reply)

LOL. I wish it were totally free. I'd stay forever. As it is I think this will be one of the few times that I'll let a subscription go on into a second month. Lots to see and select from since the last time I was there.

07-27-11  09:12am

Reply
57
N/A REPLY TO #21 from lk2fireone: (turboshaft's Reply)

Where I live, people are supposed to pick up after their dogs poop. But that rule seems to be ignored quite often. Like most rules, I suppose, the rules are meant for "other" people. Lol.

07-02-11  04:36pm

Reply
58
N/A REPLY TO #18 from Denner: (turboshaft's Reply)

Your're right there, turbushaft...small dog: Temper, temper!!!
Most times we (the dog and I) meet special kinds of small dogs they go crazy - normally only males - towards another and bigger male - somewhat also connected to their fear, I guess.
But a lady with two small terriers said to me often: These two small guys have an urge to provoke other and bigger male dogs....some David and Goliath thing, maybe.....LOL.


07-02-11  09:09am

Reply
59
N/A REPLY TO #12 from anyonebutme: (turboshaft's Reply)

"Just be thankful we don't have Smell-O-Vision..."

Oh they most definitely have this in the pipeline. Just wait, it's closer than you think.


06-10-11  07:28pm

Reply
60
N/A REPLY TO #11 from BadMrFrosty: (turboshaft's Reply)

There are sex shops on every street corner here Prague so they must be going swift business. Funny thing is I dont think I have ever seen anyone entering or leaving one, spooky...

06-10-11  06:10am

Reply
61
Visit Simon Scans

Simon Scans
(1)
Reply of turboshaft's Review from williamj:

The review about sums it all up. The video are average at best. Its a fun one month site to visit every few years.

06-03-11  11:31am

Reply
62
N/A REPLY TO #18 from HeatherMcXxx: (turboshaft's Reply)

Ha! I can assure you that you're accurate on that point. :) Thanks for the reply -- I appreciate it! :)

05-19-11  12:08pm

Reply
63
N/A REPLY TO #12 from Drooler: (turboshaft's Reply)

Hey, you forgot old refrain, "And if you order in the next 10 minutes, we'll double the offer! That's right, you get TWO SuperTool-in-1 Police-Radar Detector/Ab-Cruncher/E-Zone-Stimulator/Car-Wash Sprayers.

Just pay separate shipping and handling!

And we're not done yet ..."

That made me think of new tag line, btw.

I'll bet the day will come when sex toy companies go public on the exchanges. Right now, maybe they're already trading on the "Pink Sheets" yuk-yuk-yuk ...


04-28-11  04:35pm

Reply
64
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(2)
REPLY TO #18 from messmer: (turboshaft's Reply)

LOL. It is a hefty site indeed, turboshaft and I have made full use of the download speeds to add tons of videos to my stash. Time for a new external drive! I really find myself surprised by this site, it contains so many elements I usually don't find all that attractive: shower / bath tub scenes, outdoor shoots, behind the scenes material, and I ask myself what did I ever see wrong in these things because ALSSCAN is doing a really great job of producing exciting material.

As a matter of fact, I am tempted to up my score a notch or two. And just what's wrong with shaved? I love shaved! :-)

Oh, yes, I also had forgotten all about my love of "puffies" until I subscribed to this site. Between the videos of Faye Reagan and Blue Angel I can gorge on puffies! Now I will have to find a web site that features puffies! I wonder if there is such a thing? :-)


04-28-11  03:07pm

Reply
65
N/A REPLY TO #13 from RustyJ: (turboshaft's Reply)

Well, the truth is that DRM does not protect against piracy. It just prevents fair use. Same applies to most copy protection methods. They are just an extra trouble for the one who bought his stuff fair but it all gets removed by pirates letting those who just download for free enjoy better product than those who paid.

04-20-11  09:34pm

Reply
66
N/A REPLY TO #12 from tangub: (turboshaft's Reply)

LOL....i wish it was as easy as accidental discharges....it's bloody hard work getting there at my age.

02-24-11  02:48am

Reply
67
N/A REPLY TO #10 from jberryl69: (turboshaft's Reply)

Exquisite Films has completed shooting "Charlie Shein's Vegas Porn Star Party," a recreation of one TV actor's long, lost weekend.

"Charlie Shein's Vegas Porn Star Party" is an original parody, composed of entirely new scenes recreating Charlie's vacation of pleasure and porn stars.

Directed by Jordan Septo, the film stars Bobbi Starr, Rebecca Blue, Tara Lynn Foxx, Lexi Belle, Breanne Benson, Sienna West, Ashli Orion, Anthony Rosano, Danny Mountain and Barry Scott.

The three-disc DVD set distributed by Exquisite Films will be available on March 22. The eight hours of footage includes bonus scenes and extras, such as Charlie's Girls's on Disc 3 which consists of XXX scenes with the real porn stars linked to Charlie Sheen.

Nuff Said?


02-22-11  08:24am

Reply
68
N/A REPLY TO #20 from pat362: (turboshaft's Reply)

I think that it's women who find breast milk discusting. At least that's what I got from a conversation up with a pregnant co-worker. Her general attitude was more of discuss than anything else. I'd be of the opinion that most guys would have no problem with sharing momma's milk with their baby or any baby for that matter.

01-27-11  07:12pm

Reply
69
N/A REPLY TO #5 from graymane: (turboshaft's Reply)

Touch, my fellow poll-dweller. Head's up call.
Indeed, "hands-down" is an incompatable term. But if you think about it, depending on one's body position ......the term could still be a valid one after all.. :=)


01-14-11  04:20am

Reply
70
N/A REPLY TO #17 from jberryl69: (turboshaft's Reply)

The entire topic of respectful porn seems like an oxymoron.

I see this interview and sex act by Brandi Lyons who talks about getting out of the business cause she thinks her 10 year old will find out what she does, then gets fucked sucked and analized as a finale.

It just seems crazy.

I try not to over think it, but am willing to pay to watch sex acts without thinking badly about the performers. Seeing a two GF's fist each other, or a married couple screw, or a female degrading herself at Facial Abuse, I realize that this is what they've chosen as a venue. I can only take so much of any of these, but I could watch Rebecca Blue, Gracie Glam, Jesse Jordan or Kasey Chase choke down deep throat all day.

But in the end, whatever a person uses to justify watching is okay. If they think the make it okay with themselves as the type of porn is respectful well, who's to say. Not me, though I still feel it's an oxymoron.


11-30-10  07:03am

Reply
71
N/A REPLY TO #15 from lk2fireone: (turboshaft's Reply)

Masturbation used to be called self-abuse. Maybe it still is. The idea behind that is that you are injuring yourself (psychologically?) if you masturbate.

So if you masturbate, you are not respecting yourself as a "normal" person would.

Then again, homosexuality was considered a mental disease when I was growing up. Plenty of people still think of it that way.

And regarding porn, I'm sure many people would consider all porn "degrading and objectifying." Objectifying seems to be some kind of curse word that labels whatever I don't like as "poo poo".


11-30-10  03:23am

Reply
72
N/A REPLY TO #14 from slutty: (turboshaft's Reply)

not to start any kind of fight, but movie companies have been using aspect ratios larger than 4:3 for decades. I'm no film historian or anything, but I believe most movies starting in the 70s were shot in 2.4:1 panavision. I'm sure there are some films that have been shot in 4:3, but I doubt it is very many. Just because a movie was 4:3 when it originally came out on VHS or Betamax or whatever doesn't mean that was the aspect ratio that it was shot in.

You have it a bit backwards, in that most films were "pan and scanned" to fit the 4:3 aspect ratios of televisions, the widescreen releases of older films are not cropping the original film, they are actually returning to something closer to the orginal aspect ratio, it is the 4:3 film that has been cropped.

In fact Blu-rays of modern movies still have black bars on the top and bottom because they are preserving the original aspect ratio which is greater than 16:9. A full screen HD hollywood movie has likely still been cropped to conform to 16x9, although somewhat less than it would have to be for 4:3.

I looked around for a bit for a resource on this and this is the closest I could find:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect_ratio_(image)

They even note Ben Hur was shot in 2.76:1 - crazy-ass widescreen. doubt they'll be releasing TVs in that ratio anytime soon...

Sorry for the longwinded response, no disrespect, just trying to clarify.


11-26-10  11:10pm

Reply
73
N/A REPLY TO #13 from graymane: (turboshaft's Reply)

Doggone well said, Turbo. One certainly couldn't argue the merits of anything about that anology. The combinations even turned around my thinking on the matter.

11-23-10  09:55pm

Reply
74
N/A REPLY TO #12 from slutty: (turboshaft's Reply)

yeah I saw that, pretty funny. and you never know, the pat down might put some folks in the mood for porn.

a friend of mine swears he saw porn playing on the TV of some SUV in bumper-to-bumper traffic.


11-23-10  09:44pm

Reply
75
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Jay G: (turboshaft's Reply)

Really good point about the potential "bait and switch" of some tours. Any info I can get before joining a site is helpful to me.

10-25-10  07:20am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 51-75 of 227 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.64 seconds.