Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit abbywinters

abbywinters (0)

messmer (137) 07-26-11  06:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 08-21-11  04:03pm  (Update History)
Reason: Split movies in g/g section plus .. see below!
Pros: 1384 beautiful, natural models.

Latest movies are available in Lo, Regular, High and HD. High is very good at 1024x576p while HD is at 1280x720p and also very nice and crisp.

Pictures are available in two sizes, 3888x2592px and 1470x980px, zipped. The sets are huge but for those who think less is more there are also “the best of” reduced sets available of the same models.

I love the fact that so many pictures and videos are heavily tagged, it really encourages one to browse and I've come across some incredible material via the tag method already.

Homepage layout is a joy, even giving one a preview of what's to come for the whole month ahead complete with samples.

Download Manager friendly, plus ample bandwidth given to the user. I downloaded 5 videos at a time and was still able to move freely around the site and even watch smooth streaming while downloading.

Download speed for me was over my max at 2.3 MB/s, either for one file or for the five combined.
Cons: I am looking hard for one! Oh, yes, b/g content .. I hate it. Will be a plus for others so will not count against the site.. In any case there is not THAT much of it, so I'll find it easy to avoid it.

I'm also not particularly keen about the “rump” shots found in many of the picture sets. I would prefer to see more of the model than just a picture of hip down to top of upper thighs.

When considering the first 100 I ever gave a site please be kind and remember that TBP states that site "could do little to improve" and I agree with that wholeheartedly.
Bottom Line: I know that a lot of us were discontent and disappointed a while ago because many movies took too long to get to the point, but I don't find this to be the case this time around.

All the videos I have looked at so far take me back to my first subscription, and to the awe and delight I felt in connection with this site. Except that this time around the videos are in one piece and in HD and the picture sets are awesome in their Ultra High Resolution size.

AW appear to keep improving with age and don't look (judging by the updates) as if they have any intention of slowing down in the foreseeable future.

The girls look and act so incredibly natural and appear to enjoy themselves so much that I am almost reluctant to describe this site as a porn site even though it was given an award by AVN.

It was my favorite site then and is in danger of quickly becoming so again.

What happened to my love of older women and fine lingerie, you may ask?

Well, this site is so enchanting that I don't find it hard at all to forgive them the lack of the above mentioned, and give AW the highest mark I've ever given anyone.

No glamour, no excessive make up, no porn star mannerisms here, just young women of all stripes and sizes who are highly erotic to me because of the fact that everything they do seems so unstaged and natural.

If the discount through TBP is still valid I would strongly recommend the “three pack” of Abby Winters to all of our users who prefer wholesome and natural.

August 21, 2011: Have reduced my score of 100 by five points because,

a) as I found out in the meantime, not all movies are in one part. In the girl-girl section they are still as a rule in four parts: "before, part 1, part 2, after." I would like for at least the main action to be in one part only. Before and after I can do without.

b) this past week's updates were exceptionally bad, in MY eyes I agree, but that's the only way I can judge a site.

Because of these two factors I have reduced my score slightly from 100 to 95.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (20)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


slutty (111) Ooooh, a 100! From a reputable user no less. Don't see those too often. Nice review.
07-26-11  10:36pm

Reply To Message


turboshaft (24) A 100?! For that rating it'd better be all that you say it is and be totally free. ;-)

Good review.

07-26-11  11:58pm

Reply To Message


Jay G (67) From messmer a 100 really means something! I'm impressed.
07-27-11  05:28am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - slutty :

Thank you slutty. I was expecting flak over the 100 especially since many of our regulars do like glamour so it's nice to see your positive response.
07-27-11  09:10am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #2 - turboshaft :

LOL. I wish it were totally free. I'd stay forever. As it is I think this will be one of the few times that I'll let a subscription go on into a second month. Lots to see and select from since the last time I was there.
07-27-11  09:12am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #3 - Jay G :

YOU'RE impressed? I'm impressed with myself! I've had to write so many negative reviews lately that I didn't think I would ever give a site anywhere near a hundred. I'm really pleased that I could do so with a clear conscience.
07-27-11  09:15am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) Have they got their lighting issues sorted?

They always used to have photosets with excessive contrast shadows.

Cap'n. :0/

07-27-11  09:28am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #7 - Capn :

The sets I have downloaded so far look fine to me, Capn. Nice lighting, nice contrasts and "cool" colours rather than the over-saturated ones one sees so often in other sites . Can't speak for all of the sets of course.
07-27-11  09:37am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #8 - messmer :

Perhaps it is an issue they addressed a while back then.

Cap'n. :0)

07-27-11  09:39am

Reply To Message


abbywinters (29)
REPLY TO #7 - Capn :

cap, we had a phase pf poor lighting a few years back that was fixed up pretty quickly. You can see a fair bit as a non-member from this page if you want to see for yourself: http://www.abbywinters.com/members
07-27-11  12:12pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #10 - abbywinters :


Thanks for the update.

Cap'n. :0)

07-27-11  12:14pm

Reply To Message


otoh (54) I share everyone's previous impressed-ness with your score of 100 here, messmer :) Another site which I've been tempted by but not yet joined... although I see you've given the possibly comparable Girls Out West a high score, a while back. It possibly seems a little raunchier? I may be tempted to try it before AW.
07-28-11  07:32am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #12 - otoh :

Thanks, otoh! Here's the low-down on Girls Out West. I was tempted to subscribe to that site first because my experience with AW wasn't so great with my last subscription. I really did, along with others, find their videos too overloaded with talk with only a few minutes left for some sort of strip. Now there is a nice balance, the girls still take their time but nevertheless get where you want them to go faster. It is a nice, natural, charming progression and I love it.

Now to get back to GOW. That site is indeed rawer and raunchier but their latest sample picture sets disappointed me greatly because they have switched to a much warmer color than I like in the meantime. I love "cool" color temperatures on my TV and in my videos and pictures. If you like deep, vivid colors GOW might still be a good choice. The models in both sites are refreshingly natural and amateurish which is their strongest selling point for me. AW beats them for looks overall, though. At least I think so.

07-28-11  10:55am

Reply To Message


williamj (9) Top reviewer must have been impressed. Great review I agree its a good site if the niche is your thing. But when I saw 100 I and saw it was messmer I had to read it.
07-28-11  03:08pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #14 - williamj :

Thanks, williamj. And you are right, of course. You would have to love the niche of "natural" as opposed to "glamor" in order to see why I gave it a 100. Reviews will always reflect one's personal taste and therefore tend to be subjective. :-)
07-28-11  03:18pm

Reply To Message


otoh (54) REPLY TO #13 - messmer :

Many thanks, sir messmer, for the direction :) Much appreciated - still undecided but one or other will reach the top of my list soon!
07-30-11  12:25am

Reply To Message


graymane (33) Well, Pardner, you sold me.
I can't begin to sing enough praises to a site that's finally provided you with a complete and satisfactory offering.... being so powerful as to seize front and center from your " love of older women and fine lingerie."
A score of 100????? Boy! I gotta go for this one!
Webmaster ought to take you and family out to dinner, cuz this'll produce a windfall they'll unlikely forget.
I just opted for a three month sub. to Figure girl. The price is right and the content might also be right down your alley.
You might want to catch some recent reviews on this site.

08-07-11  11:31pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #17 - graymane :

Thanks, graymane. I'll have to take a look at Figure Girl. As to AW, just remember that its charm for me is in the "innocence" of most models. It is very refreshing to see the girls act so naturally and without all that excessive make up. If you do like glamor or something a bit "harder" it wouldn't appeal to you. Were you a member previously? If you weren't it might also prove to be very costly to get all three sites. Of course it the TBP discount for all three sites is still valid it would still be a good deal. I don't want to scare you off, it's just a heads up in case you are not into "natural!"
08-08-11  10:52am

Reply To Message


BradlyH (Disabled) This site didn't impress me too much, but that's me and my taste. It obviously impressed you which is good ! I'm glad to see some one honest put up 100, It's how you felt about the site and although it shouldn't have to be heavily justified i think you did a great job on everything.

All these reviews are all about Opinion and how we liked it. So if some one loves it and feels it shouldn't be anything under 99 then who is to say they are "wrong"

Keep up the good reviews Messmer !

08-20-11  01:21pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #19 - BradlyH :

Thanks BradyH! I do agree that it's all subjective. What's the greatest site ever to one can be ho-hum to another. I simply love the fact that the girls are so natural and are acting so natural, compared to most other sites. Because I have developed a fondness for videos and subscribe to all three sub-sites I have found tons of good material to download. I especially love g/g material as well as Intimate moments .. so, perfect for me.

BTW, I was tempted to join Girls Out West myself, but in their latest emails to me I found their latest sample pictures had become too warm for my taste (too much color, too much of an orangey cast) while I prefer my color temperature on the cool side as in AW. If you join GOW I would appreciate if you clued me in on this subject because I was always fond of that site as well! Was too colorful just a fluke or are they all like that now? Thanks.

08-21-11  10:59am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.