Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan (1)

messmer (137) 04-25-11  10:39am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (1)

Audition Videos!

I really like this site's audition videos. I usually don't care for "Behind The Scenes" material but there's something about all those hopeful young beauties getting undressed, and their reaction to the audition, that makes these videos some of my favorites. Just thought I would mention this because the videos aren't featured under the main updates and might be missed by some. And as an aside, I'd accept every one of the hopefuls! I am glad I didn't have to make the eliminations because to me they'd all look good in ALS SCAN.

There are also High Resolution Picture sets of the auditions available but I found quite a few of the pictures out of place and deleted those sets until their editors straighten things out.

I might have kept them, flaws and all, but one set weighed in at a hefty 3 Gigs plus. So, beside the problem of models ending up in each others audition there was also the problem of having to go through a huge number of pictures to correct the mistakes. As well as the loss of 3.3 Gigs memory on an ever more crowded external hard drive.

P.S. Just came across some audition videos in the main section of the site so if you look long enough you will find them there as well.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (8)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Sarah (13)
Webmaster
Hi Messmer. I was unable to identify any issues with the numbering in our casting sets. Could you please tell me exactly where you saw this problem so I can fix it?
04-26-11  06:04am

Reply To Message

2

messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - Sarah :

Hi Sarah, thanks for taking an interest in our comments and concerns. I can't really tell you which zip file I found the mixed up pictures in because I deleted all of them, all I remember is that this particular zip file might have been the one that was over 3 Gigs big. You would show a number of pictures of one model, then all of a sudden an unconnected picture of another model would pop up, then back to the original one and this kept repeating itself. There were also pictures of a model getting dressed after the audition of what appeared to be a startlingly short set, a new model would come on for a few pictures and then there would once again be a return to the previous model who had just got finished dressing, but this time she was still in the middle of her audition.

I didn't check the whole set because I got annoyed, so you should find the culprits fairly early in the set(s). I watched the sets with the viewer that's built into my zip utility rather than unzipping them, maybe that could be the problem but it would be the first time this sort of thing has happened to me.

Love your site.

04-26-11  10:00am

Reply To Message

3

Sarah (13)
Webmaster
Thanks Messmer!

We fixed the problem. I believe you ran into issues because of the numbering of our pics in the latest casting. When downloaded all together in the zip pack, certain pictures may have appeared out of order. Thanks for pointing this out and we'll make sure this doesn't happen again.

04-27-11  12:05pm

Reply To Message

4

messmer (137) REPLY TO #3 - Sarah :

Thanks for the prompt fix, Sarah!
04-27-11  02:21pm

Reply To Message

5

turboshaft (24) Messmer, I couldn't remember from when I was a member but do they allow member voting for these mass auditions, or is it just BTS long after the audition?

It'd be pretty cool if they allowed a democratic audition selection but I bet the webmasters would have some serious disagreements. Hell, they've been selecting ALS-approved models for well over a decade I'm sure they have a more finely tuned wow-factor meter. ; - )

04-28-11  01:18pm

Reply To Message

6

messmer (137) REPLY TO #5 - turboshaft :

Turboshaft, my sincerest apologies. I never realized that I had failed to respond to your question. I just came across it today as I looked in on the site because of a new review. And four months later: The BTS selection process was published after the fact so I don't think there was any voting! :-)
08-07-11  01:59pm

Reply To Message

7

turboshaft (24) REPLY TO #6 - messmer :

No worries, I didn't even realize I had asked a question! :-)

I sort of knew the answer anyway as I think Alex had mentioned on ALS' blog that they wouldn't allow members to actually choose the models. I think we've also discussed it here in the reviews or in the forum somewhere that ALS doesn't do this, and basically no site lets its members make hiring decisions.

The only "voting" that goes on is in e-mail correspondence, and possibly sites like this as well, where a model is popular enough to come back for a second shoot. Of course, in ALS' case they can all come back!

08-07-11  07:10pm

Reply To Message

8

messmer (137) REPLY TO #7 - turboshaft :

"Of course, in ALS' case they can all come back!"

Oh, yeah!! :-)

08-07-11  07:24pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.