No thank you; I find it about as nice as feet sucking--not at all!
And I assume it has to be done where the lickee (sp?) hasn't put on any deodorant/antiperspirant, since you really shouldn't be licking that stuff, and I'm guessing the natural body odor/fragrances of people, or at least their armpits, is part of the turn-on.
Love it! But then again I find bukakke excessive, striptease glacial, feet unattractive, and Maxim bordering on the obscene, so my tastes may be a different from what the average porn viewer finds acceptable.
One of things I can actually account for my weird love and fascination with "pee content"/golden showers is this: I figure that since fewer women in porn will ever do it on camera, it's more exclusive. (Same is true in real life, but you might have to broach the subject with caution.) Beyond that, I figure it could be anything from interest in something considered taboo to mixed up brain chemistry.
Slow and sensual blowjobs can be lots of fun in real life, but they get old quick on camera. Plus really sloppy, drooly BJs; stupid dialogue/forced "dirty" talk; and too much kissing all bore me pretty easily.
And, I would say most importantly, the girl rimming the guy. These are like blowjobs; way more fun to receive than to watch (and possibly perform, depending on the adventurousness of the girl), and almost always look way more forced than then when performed on a female. Like to the point where the guy is holding her head down there...and the audience doesn't want to be there either.
"Other," since it depends so heavily on what the scene is going for; artistic, "reality"/gonzo, parody, etc. Obviously, something like a scene that starts in a shower should begin fully nude. You know: innocent girl already taking shower, boyfriend/stranger/passerby wanders in, strips almost instantaneously, coupling commences (door locks rarely seem to be functioning in the world of porn).
But I'm okay with those starting off fully dressed as long as the striptease is not overdone, or it's something other than one of those sites like Fully Clothed Pissing where they're wearing most of the items throughout. Also, my porn wardrobe pet peeve is the scenes where the obligatory high heels never, ever come off. I honestly don't find them that sexy to begin with, and at some point in the scene they just look silly, not to mention eye-gouging to the nearest co-perfomer.
They have definitely refined (even if I have not!), especially as I become increasingly picky about quality in this age of broadband speeds and HD videos. They have somewhat narrowed in the sense that I'm even more focused on my preferred niche, with occasional diversions into other ones when the mood strikes me.
Sadly, as mine have refined the sites that I used to love have not. ALSScan is the most prominent example, as I use to really love it and its whole approach to solo/girl-girl material. Then I went elsewhere for a while and it jumped the shark into boy-girl material...for shame! Oh well, you don't get everything you want in life. :-/
Love how this site takes this fetish seriously, if that's the right word to use when discussing golden showers. Normally it's relegated to something only done at the end of scene so webmasters can just add another tag, and rather clumsily at that. Even better, it has long, hot, and enthusiastic girl-girl scenes which can be kind of rare within this genre. It's one thing to watch a pretty girl do a standard boy-girl or solo scene, but quite another to discover she's done work for this site.
As far as I'm aware this site is totally exclusive, if also appearing to be the hardcore side of Wet and Pissy, though the companies are different. A model seems to do W&P and/or Wet and Puffy, and then move on to this. Those sites' solo scenes are well done, but again, add a second girl and it becomes even better, IMHO.
Also, there has been at least one American performer on here, Tiffany Fox, who's also done solo scenes for both Wet & Pissy and Wet & Puffy. Still wish they did have more American performers though.
But, somehow, even worse is the sleazy heavy breathing when the camera mic is set a little to high and you can just hear the guy's wheezing throughout the scene--think Phillip Seymour Hoffman in Happiness, and sometimes with much the same dialogue. But at least there it was funny.
One of those lazy porn tropes I don't care for at all.
I guess some are into it; like it makes the scene truly "hard" or something, but I find it unnecessary and disrespectful. You can easily make a scene hot and nasty without so blatantly hating the women in it. And rough sex in general doesn't actually require such contrived name-calling to make it entertaining.
For my money, Kink.com is the biggest culprit of this practice, especially when they have a mini interview at the beginning where everyone comes across as happy and friendly...followed by an hour of stilted slurs and put-downs. Their whole schtick is consensual nastiness yet can't seem to give up the verbal abuse.
CDs already gone this way have for serious data and video storage.
Audio CDs have been around since 1982, but they aren't impervious to the effects of time and environment. The aluminum alloy used isn't exactly the most corrosion-resistant material available--if at least being considerably cheaper than gold--but it's pretty amazing to think that CDs are still around after three+ decades. (LaserDisc is, of course, older, but it's not truly digital nor has it ever been that popular.)
True, in the sense that you kept an "old shoot" because it had some value to it, beyond what a new shoot may only have in pixels. I've kept (and backed up) plenty of old material that's not HD and frequently delete newer stuff.
I think I first heard "landing strip" in middle school (probably the only knowledge I still retain from then, go figure), so I thought it was American vernacular. I generally think of landing strips as narrower than the "rectangle" the poll is referring to--though to say it could always use more study is an understatement!
Supply and demand; plenty of both, so a lot of people don't feel the need to pay for what they see as a nearly bottomless well of smut. And everything is digital, so pirating takes almost no effort, arguably easier than even subscribing to a site.
Outside of porn, I have a hard time being totally sympathetic to larger companies that can afford some pirating and don't work to make it more attractive for viewers to pay. HBO is the best example at the moment. A premium cable channel that offers no online-only subscription because of current infrastructure and provider agreements. They don't want to piss off the cable monopolies, and way more Americans' homes are wired for cable TV than high speed Internet. So they figure it's not yet time for standalone Go service yet--and they are well aware that lot of people pirate their most popular content.
I prefer things full screen, so if the offending photo/vid doesn't pass this test reasonably well then it's straight to the trash bin.
I have plenty of old 640x480 vids that besides being smaller aren't unwatchable, and it's not like the content was ever secretly shot on Imax or something. But I was recently going through stuff I had downloaded from VideosZ and eventually I just started deleting whole folders; the content was just not worth the space.
Yes, always; but fortunately that's not too often. Compared to iTunes--which seems to offer updates every couple of days--my preferred browser (Firefox) isn't too frequent, though I inevitably lose an add-on or two for a couple of updates.
Outside of my computer, my PS3 can be a real pest for updates; it basically doesn't let you use certain games or online apps (like Netflix, for example) if you don't sign in and go through a system or game update. Nothing more irritating about the system than sitting down to watch something on Netflix or play a game and wait ten or fifteen minutes for an update to download, install, and restart. :-(
Put it into a holding area, though this had been suffering from overcrowding recently. I get lazy and don't bother to organize and upload it to a hard drive.
It's good to review things before just arbitrarily saving it to an external drive. A boring thirty minute video can be an incredible waste of space. Of course going through a few of these just to find out they're all trash/recycle bin worthy can feel like an incredible waste of time. Tags have been helping some cases, especially if I want to quickly find a certain actress or act and avoid duplication (especially due to something stupid like having an older version I saved at a different resolution).
I'll add a qualifier to this that would make me love bukkake--albeit in person more than onscreen--a reverse bukkake! :-0
You know, one of those crazy scenes were some "poor" guy is surrounded by a bunch of women who stand over him and then "squirt" on him. Of course part of my fantasy is just being able to remember all their names, but a man can dream...
Or an all-girl bukkake, though those can be kind of rare. JM Productions was producing some pretty entertaining ones in their all-girl gangbang "Violation of" series from mid-1990s to the late 2000s.
I don't really care about it, in that I don't go seeking it out and it's pretty easy to avoid in porn, since it's a genre that by name alone is an automatic trigger warning.
I find that with lots of guys and one girl on the receiving end it becomes less sexual and more stunt-like. So you really just end up watching it for the spectacle (spunktacle?) of seeing a woman handle that many "splashes" rather than seeing much semblance of any real enjoyment on her part.
The only time I might seek it out is if there is a certain performer who I thought of as "innocent" of such boy-girl acts and wanted to watch her perform in something outside her usual comfort zone. But once is more than enough in even those rare cases.
I feel that several times a week--spread across multiple days, of course--can qualify as "frequent." Even pornographers need the weekends off. ;-)
There are a few blogs I follow that update multiple times per day and can't even keep up with them, and these are ones written by a single person. I don't expect a reasonably sized porn operation (a handful of people) to update more than once a day. All those 'shopped photos, edited videos, and childishly dirty scene descriptions/terrible translations take time.
I'd say in the B to C range, really depends on the individual woman. C cups can look silly on some smaller-framed women and starts to look like evidence of enthusiastic implanting--the "top-heavy" look, if you will.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.