Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Excellent site in a relative under-served niche
- 165 scenes
- Updating regularly
- Many good looking models
- Most models are ‘amateur’
- ome porn stars early in their careers
- Now uploading in 1280p
- Packaged with another excellent amateur site
- Male talent who never tries to upstage the models
- Excellent camerawork and editing
- Innovative use of split screen and picture-in-picture
- Supports download managers
- Bills through CCBill
Cons:
- Only the most recent updates are HD. Older scenes can be low resolution
Bottom Line:
Lately I’ve developed an interest in ‘casting’ videos and this is one of the better sites in that niche. A membership here includes a membership to two other sites: Exploited College Girls and Net Video Girls. ECG is a great site and makes a membership here better. NVG isn’t terrible, but, in my opinion, it is the weakest site of the three. I should point out that the TBP review doesn’t say anything about the additional sites but I’ve joined twice now and both times that was the deal. I just checked again and it is still being offered.
The site’s premise is that a guy passes himself off as a porn agent and has women come by to talk about getting into the business. The setting is an office and the scene is recorded using two cameras on tripods and a handheld POV camera. The ‘agent’ explains the business to the model and then she is encouraged to make a demo tape that the agent will then use to get work for her. The demo consists of the model getting naked, masturbating, performing oral on the agent and then getting fucked. Many of the scenes have some anal sex but it is usually short. Even if you aren’t as big a fan of anal as I am, the anal isn’t obtrusive. Some may criticize the site as being too formulaic. It is that, but in my opinion, the formula works so why fix what isn’t broken?
Most of the models are unknown to me, though there are a few who went on to porn careers. Tanner Mayes (as Evangeline), Kacey Jordan, Shawna Lenee (as Kara), Amia Miley and Chastity Lynn are here, early in their careers. While there is no way that the premise could be real (given the paperwork involved to do porn), the models play the role well and really add to the feel of the scene. There is some variety in models with different body types, though the majority are Caucasian and petite. Most of the models are very good looking. There are a few videos with pregnant models if you’re into that.
There have been negative comments about the male ‘agent.’ I don’t share those opinions because I find that he knows that members aren’t joining to see him so he is unobtrusive.
Using two stationary cameras and a POV camera could be the site’s weak point, but it isn’t. The camera work and editing are great and really work well for the atmosphere. One feature that I really like is the use of split screen or picture-in-picture. For example, the model may be bent over the desk in a standing doggy position and one half of the screen is a camera pointing at her face while the other half is the POV camera held above the model’s ass.
There are currently about 165 videos on the site with most being about 30 minutes long. The site does update regularly, but since my membership expired four days ago I can’t confirm the update schedule but my recollection is that it is at least one new scene per week.
The scenes are only available in one file type, WMV, but they are available as clips or as the full scene. There are usually two resolutions available (labelled as high and low). I only downloaded the highest resolution full scenes so I can’t comment on the lower resolution or clips.
Speaking of resolution, there is good news and bad news. The good news is that the site appears to have undergone a re-work and at the same time it looks like the last 12-15 uploads are available in 1280x720 at 3500kb/s and 29 fps. These look great. File sizes are between 500-800MB, though there are a few that hit a gigabyte. The bad news is that before the site started uploading HD the resolutions were lower. With a lot of the older scenes on the site that can be pretty low. Most are 768x432 (which still look good), some are 576x324, some are 640x360 and some 480x360. Obviously the smaller resolution files were uploaded a long time ago and don’t look good by today’s standards.
The site supports download managers and I had no issues with links timing out. I didn’t encounter any speed reductions or download limits. The site bills through CCBill.
The bottom line is that this is an excellent site if you like this niche. It’s packaged with another excellent site (and a mediocre one too). The models are good looking and the scenes are fun to watch. The production values are good with good camerawork and editing. While the site has started uploading HD videos that was only recently so most of the videos are of lower resolution. Not only do I highly recommend this site but it is on my list of sites to regularly rejoin to download new scenes.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- about 130 videos and a new one every Tuesday evening. Unfortunately the videos are all different sizes, quality and can either be mpg or wmv, some of them only one or the other.
- some seriously hot girls. Look through the tour to see some very cute girls, and if you look on the porn tubes you can usually find one or two previews to his videos (only the highlights, for the good stuff you have to join)
- the scenes seem very unscripted, it's just a dude with a camera and a girl. Which means that sometime he runs around setting stuff up or he chats with the girl while she lubes herself, if you like that kind of real, pierre woodman-like stuff that you'll love this site. If you prefer perfect light, professional zoom-ins and generally more mainstream stuff, this might put you off. On the other hand seeing a girl hold a camera and then seeing how it shakes as she cums (and either they are incredible actors or they really cum) makes this site very unique.
Cons:
- Download speeds can be slow at times. I got anywhere from 50kb to 900, no clue why or how.
- Whole site is very amateur-ish, just like the content. There is one video were he even says he accidentally forgot to turn on one camera so we just get one angle. I thought it was funny, but other people might feel cheated out.
-Some girls only do solo (only one or two, but still a tag system would have been nice) Unfortunately the site has no search and the descriptions are not always very clear. I remember for one girl he says he can't believe she does anal, well she doesn't :)
-Some girls are not first time on video. Nicole Ray and Chastity are both professional models and I bet a few more of the girls are too, kinda shame really since the amateurs are so much cutter. There is one read head soccer mom who tries anal and her scene is incredibility hot.
- No photos, really a shame.
- No bonus sites. I understand a year or two back the site came in a package, no more
Bottom Line:
This site has two very big bonuses going for it. Hot amateur girls. Many of the models are truly shy and a bit uncomfortable and it shows, also the guy is not a huge douche like other porn models. I think I mentioned this before but he closely resembles Pierre Woodman, he is there to convince these girls to have sex on camera, but he won't abuse them more than they want to be abused and that makes the whole video a lot more enjoyable. Going back to that hot read-head soccer mom I mentioned before, she tries anal and is clearly uncomfortable and he immediately stops the scene instead of pushing it. The whole moment along with the look on her face lets you know this is real, unscripted sex, but with much better camera work than a truly amateur scene.
Oh and there is also the twitter, which the guy uses to posts future interviews and ask for feedback, very nice usage of the web 2.0 media.
Unfortunately, here is where the good things stop and I have to mention the very plain site design, the lack of bonus features, the lack of a decent search button and the fact that we don't get photo-sets. For the same price I pay here I can get a Nubiles or Little Mutt subscription and get three times the content. It's true those sites don't have the interviews and the whole "real" setting, but then again you can join woodmanX and get similar content and a lot more of it (then again woodman is more expensive and not all scenes are in English).
So, the bottom line? I love the site, but I can see how many people wouldn't feel the same way. It lacks in features and if you don't LOVE the pov, interview, reality kinda videos these will leave you feeling a bit cheated. I for one will download a bunch of the videos and probably join back in a year or so for the updates, in the mean time I am following the twitter feed and will enjoy that incredibly hot read-head (did I mention here already ? I feel like I did :).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Content is all exclusif.
+there are more than 190 scenes.
+The vast majority of the girls are amateurs and this is one of the few places you'll see them do hardcore.
+They have a wide variety of teen models.
Cons:
-They don't seem to updating very often but I can't say how often they do because they don't put dates on their content.
-The videos can only be downloaded in WMV and resolution is a rather poor 640x360.
-All the videos are shot in POV and the guy doesn't really know how use a camera.
-The interview part of the video is a complete waste of time and pure BS.
-All the scenes are shot in the same office and on the same couch and desk.
-There is no editing so a good chunk of the video is the guy moving the camera or tripod around the room.
-The sex is mediocre at best.
-Still no pics of any kind.
Bottom Line:
*I only joined this site because I got a deal when I joined exploited college girls because you also get this one. This is my second time on this site and it will also be my final time.
*The premise for the site is very interesting and someone with talent should be able to make a killing but the guy responsible for this mess either doesn't have any talent or simply doesn't care about the final product. You would think that someone who's been doing this for as long as he has would get better with time but I did not see a difference between the newer videos and the older stuff.
*All the flaws that were there in 2010 are still there. You have the stupid interview where it's hard to believe the BS being said. You have his hiden face whenever it's in the shot. The videos are all POV and tripod shot so that's already a negative. There are many bad camera angles, weird cut in the action, bad camera position during the action so that the shots are wasted, he likes to talk during the video.
*Shooting in an office environment with a chair, desk and the typical casting couch is such a bad idea because the room is small, the performer is never really made comfortable and this nis especially true during the sex because she will either be on her back on the hard desk(no padding of any kind), bent forward over the desk or having sex on the sofa which happens to be a few feet in front of the sofa whcih means that you can't really use the tripoid appropriately during what should be the most comfortable part of the video for the girl.
**It's hard to recommend this mess to anyone but anyone who wants to see amateurs have sex and don't really mind if the sex is badly shot, not very intense, where the male is not a good sex performer and where each video looks like the previous one might get something out of it. Everyone else should stay far away.**
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some attractive ladies
-Interesting concept, videos typically provide both a "regular" scene and either POV or behind the scenes
-Newer videos pretty decent quality, 640x360 4150 kbps WMV was the best I saw
-Zip downloads of photosets, although photosets are pretty limited
-Decent sized collection, 156 models at time of review. A lot of the models that appear here also appear on their sister site: backroomcastingcouch.com. Most models only have 1 scene (with a POV and regular video) some have multiple.
-Better navigation than their sister site, have model index, but no search function.
-Provide model information
-Exclusive content
-No DRM
-Download managers work
Cons:
-Model attractiveness is pretty variable
-Download speeds are not great, best I have seen is 400 KB/s
-Older videos are poor quality, 480x360 1600 kbps MPG was worst I have seen so far
-Camerawork isn't the best
-Photo quality is mediocre
-Price is a little high given the quantity of content
-Too many tattoos
-The guy in the scenes is sort of a douche
-Guy censors his face, which can be distracting in the scenes
-1 update per week
-No real bonus content, some non exclusive steaming sites is all you get.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site primarily because they have a few models I liked from backroomcastingcouch, and I figured this site was bigger so it'd probably also be better. While the site does have some good content, and I like the concept of providing the POV and the regular scene, I found it to be sort of lacking compared with backroomcastingcouch. I can't really put my finger on why, perhaps the models weren't as good (although the two sites have many of the same models), perhaps I am now realizing that the dude is a pretty standard porn douchebag. He seems to get off much more on humiliation than on the other site. Edit: Just realized its a different dude than the other place.
I don't get what is sexy about having the ladies lick his ass, perhaps this is a turn-on for some, but certainly not for me. I plan on editing all that crap out of the videos - and this is not a rare occurence, I'd say almost half of the videos have this type of content.
There is definitely more anal on this site than on their other site, for those that are interested in that kind of stuff. Although I would say it is still not super-common, maybe 15-25% of the videos or so.
There are definitely some videos from this site I will keep, and there are a couple that may become favorites, so I wouldn't say this site is a total waste of money, but it definitely isn't great, and definitely could use some work. Get rid of the dude, if he doesn't want to show his face, find someone that will, or at least teach him some manners. He is starting to sound an aweful lot like those jackasses on the BangBus.
Also, merge these two sites for the same price. There are tons of sites out there that are cheaper with 10x the content, 60% of the price of these two sites combined. If they still have to source material, they really should re-encode the old stuff, that bitrate is just totally unacceptable these days.
Bottom Line, a site worth joining if you see some models you like in the preview. Although don't count on being overly impressed with the material. Certainly not worth joining for more than a month given the infrequent updates.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-He seems to have the first video from some of todays rising stars.
-He gets the first anal scene from some girls coming into the biz.(see cons)
-The average length of the videos is about 30 minutes to an hour.
-There are over 200 scenes.
Cons:
-Some of the girls are doing their first anal scene and frankly the looks they have on their faces and the sound they make may leave some uncomforatble.
-All the scenes are in POV format and some of the angles are annoying and the camera has a tendency to move since he;s holding it in his nads as he's screwing. As far as I can tell the guy uses 1-2 cameras and edites the scene to show a couple of different views.
-You can only download 4 scenes at a time and it takes about 10-20 min to download a scene.
-The video quality is average at best and you can only download one format(WMV).
Bottom Line:
This site has the potential to be so much better than it is. I think the POV thing has limited appeal. I don't mind some of the scene in POV but at some point I want to see the action from different angles.
This is a one man show and he likes to hear is own voice during the scene. He saves money since he doesn't have to hire any male talent.
The downside is that it's always his tool in each scene. On the plus side. He makes mine look good.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
03-15-1207:07pm (Update History) Reason: I completely screwed up my reviews because this is for backroom casting couch. and not exploited college girl
Pros:
+The content is all exclusif.
+The majority of the models are amateurs and this is one of the only places where you'll see them do porn. (although a few of them have had porn careers after this)
+There are some truly good looking models and there is also a good variety.
+They update with one new video a week.
+All updates are dated.
+Videos can be downloaded a sa complete file or you can download certain sections.
Cons:
-The shooting style is very similar to backroom casting couch so it's all handheld POV, on a tripod or on the bed.
-Because the performer doesn't want his face to be seen then all the shots either avoid shooting above a certain height or his face his hidden.
-Videos can be dowloaded in MP4 or WMV but resolution is still only 640x360.
-The girls attempting anal tend to all be trying this for the first time so it's more often than not a fail or hard to watch because of pain.
Bottom Line:
*I chose to join this site because you got access to backroom casting couch(see my next review). It's my second time here and it will be my last. The content still has potential but it can't overhsadow the unapealing ponr inside.
*The site is similar to backroom casting couch and girls do porn. It is superior to BCC but it is inferior to girl do porn. The problem is that the guy has to be in the videos so he has to be both cameraman and performer. I can see the appeal for any guy to want to have sex with these girls but that also means you mostly get handheld POV shots with less than steallar angles and that's when the camera isn't moving from left to right or being dep[osited on the bed to get a face shot.
*The one positive about this site vs back room casting couch is that the guy appears to want to make the girls happy and comfortable and that helps with the scene but not if anal is in it.
I only saw a couple of the girls appeared to be enjoying themselves during the anal. The bulk of the other videos are hard to watch or listen to because you can see and hear the gilrs in pain.
**If you like POV shot porn and you also like to see amateurs and can overlook the errors in the way the videos are shot then you might enjoy the site but be advised that it's 35$ and that is not a cheap amount to pay. It would be a lot easier to recommedn if it was in the 20$ to 25$ dollar range.**
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
No DRM, download limits, or pre checked cross selling.
Beautiful amateur girls in a good variety of shape size and colour.
Genuinely amateur and individual content with its own style.
Exclusive material and most of the girls will not be seen elsewhere.
Good lighting considering the niche.
Good streaming.
Good download speed.
Zipped pics.
Named files.
Girls listed chronological and alphabetically.
Inviting home pages and easy navigation.
Still updating.
Easy log in, site remembers your details, with only an easy to see word to copy.
Good customer oriented feel.
Cons:
Poor rip off exchange rate with CCBill sign up.
Male lead can be a bit irritating at times.
One type of material.
No network of bonus sites.
A few too many fake breasts, and especially tattoos.
Condoms becoming more common.
Blurred face of male can sometimes spoil action.
Some bad camerawork and views at times. Can be amateurish.
New pics look like screencaps.
A polarised niche, you either love it or hate it.
Bottom Line:
It's just an opinion but Exploited College Girls, takes this niche and nails it brilliantly. The girl next door types are the type you wish really were living next door instead of that rottweiler, but you know you'll never get that lucky.
There is a real amateur feel here and a lack of gloss, but the girls are so beautiful they don't need much gloss, they just need someone competent enough not to fuck up capturing them on video, and merely need to look their natural gorgeous best. This is where ECG scores. It is professionally lit, edited, and photographed well enough to be erotic, with the girls looking stunning. For me it's an excellent blend of professionalism and DIY amateurism, which isn't easy to do, because so many times you see beautiful girls being made to look unbelievably unsexy, by lousy lighting, bad excessive makeup, awful camerawork with awful unflattering angles, shot by morons you wouldn't trust to shoot a rock without blurring the picture.
The recent shoots are dated and I counted 286 girls a few weeks ago. Membership gives bonus access to Backroom Casting Couch, (on a quality par with ECG), and Net Video Girls plus some free movies. This isn't a network, it's a standalone DIY site, with quality material, and beautiful girls. Given the one man and his camera thing, it's done in a professional enough way to show off the girls to maximum effect, plus you get plenty of build up, dressing, undressing, and walking around naked and semi naked.
This is just my opinion, but I think the guy does a great job, even though he may not win any humanitarian, or upstanding church goer of the month awards...or maybe he might, we don't know who he is, as his face is blurred out, something that is annoying and can detract from the action. Backroom Casting Couch is the same.
New video spec is 768x432 at 4000-6000 kbps and slightly older ones are 640x360 at 3000-5000 kbps, with the oldest being 576x324, but this isn't about HD pristine quality with models looking like they've been dipped in bronze, it's about one man and a camera, and at it's most high tech, one man and two cameras, with occasional help from a mate.
Old pictures sometimes look better than the new ones, because the new ones are screencaps rather than genuine photos. Old ones are genuine photos, and some of the bonus video footage was behind the scenes, where you could see these being taken. I love that sort of stuff, but sadly newer updates don't have any of that, although the main videos always have a certain behind the scenes flavour due to the nature of the content.
If you're a pic fan, this is not the strongest side of ECG. Examples of picture spec are 1400x930, 1600x1200, 1280x857, 1280x720, and 1400x788.
Some PU'ers have referred to the male lead as a douch bag, but given the abuse, both verbal and physical, some girls receive on mainstream sites, this is relatively mild by comparison, and there are no dirty tricks on sign up or cancellation, no drm, dl limits, regional discrimination, or pre checked cross selling. What you see and are led to expect is very much what you get. In fact the whole site is easy to use and is customer friendly. You can't say that about many.
The login is easy, and your membership details plus password are remembered, with an easy to see simple word to copy. Models are listed both chronologically and alphabetically and navigation is easy, with quite detailed previews of what an update is like, plus a long written summary about the shoot. You may not like the main man's tone, but you can't say he doesn't put in the effort. Photos are zippped, download speeds are fast, and files are numbered.
I found streaming facilities to be excellent even at peak times, when on other sites (VideoBox for instance) it's impossible to get a picture. A recent addition is the split screen view, where you see both the model's face and the other end at the same time, which is okay, but sometimes the two screens seem to get in the way of one another. There are a few scenes with condoms which are becoming more common.
When I recently visited the sign up page then closed the window, I received a $5 off offer if I joined now. That worked out at Ł17.44 for 30 days, which I accepted. When I went to cancel my subscription I received another cut price offer, which I was unable to accept as I currently don't have the time to download.
If this is the future of porn, with semi amateur girls, and semi professional shooting, done on a budget, I would be happy with that. I don't think it is, but what he is doing, with the niche, style of shooting, reality behind the scenes feel, lighting, camerawork, number of updates, price, and personalisation of site, works for him, and for me too as a customer. This is very close to how I would want to see reality porn with sexy looking amateur girls, I don't believe for one moment that is easy to do. Even the pros get it wrong more often than not, so hats off to ECG.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They have a nice mix of female body types.
-Many of the girls are amateurs or new to the porn biz.
-Nearly 150 videos.
-Videos appear to all be wmv.
-You can use a download manager.
Cons:
-No photos of any kind.(screencaps would have been nice).
-Only one page so you have to keep scrollig down to find the next videos.
-You can only download 4 videos and that's with or without a download manager.
-All the scenes are POV and he uses a couple of cameras to give you different perspectives but the editing is so bad that some of the shot are of the guy playing with the camera while many of the others ones show bad angles of the action.
-All the scenes are filmed in the same office the desk or the floor.
-The guy never stops talking and that's fine in the interview part but you would hope that once the actions starts that he'd shut-up.
-The guy doesn't want to be identified so you have a pixelated circle whenenever there is a chance that we might see his face.
Bottom Line:
The site has some good looking girls and most of these have never made it unto my porn radar so I was curious to see them in action. After having joined this site then I can honestly say, that I'm still curious to see them in action.
I'm glad that this guy has money to get girls to have sex with him on camera and his choice of girls is very good but I wish he cared enough about his customers to allow us to see them in action. Get a camera man or get a performer but don't try to be both.
If you want to see some really cute amateurs have sex and don't mind talking during the sex and the less than stellar camera shots then you might enjoy this site.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- New, fresh, beautiful women.
- High quality video.
- Long videos with LOTS of sex.
- Videos contain a large degree of variety - different sex acts (blowjobs, vaginal, anal) and lots of different angles.
Cons:
- Most videos force these poor women to lick - for a long time - this disgusting guy's disgusting butt-hole. I don't know who finds that sexy, but I think it is absolutely disgusting. Gross.
- The male "talent," (i.e. prop) who is also the camera guy, talk throughout the entire video. And not what you'd expect like asking the girl to talk about herself, etc. They ask stupid questions like "does that feel good?", "am I better than your boyfriend?" and "have you ever had one that big before?" It is constant and is a complete distraction and turn-off. Its gotten to the point where I have to completely mute the videos to watch them or I can't stomach it. Recently, they started using a new prop, whose voice is not quite so whiny, nasal and annoying as the guy who used to do this before, but the new prop still won't shut up and its a big problem.
- Site navigation is very difficult. 5 or so videos per page, in date order, that's it.
Bottom Line:
This site's (lone) redeeming quality is, without a doubt, the girls. They are new, they are young, and they are beautiful. Usually I have never seen them before, or this is the first time I've seen them and I see them again later on. They do a lot of different sex acts (more on this later), sometimes do anal, etc. (The people who complain that the anal is not sexy because the girl is in obvious pain are absolutely correct. I like anal but I completely avoid it on this site).
There are two major problems with this site that make it not worth the $35 to join - first, the constant inane talking out of the male prop. As I mentioned before, its comments like "is that a big dick?" and "tell me you're my little whore". The talking is constant and appears designed to stroke the performers' fragile egos rather than designed to contribute to the video. Originally, they had a guy doing all the videos who not only talked CONSTANTLY, but had the single most annoying voice on the planet. Thankfully, they seem to have replaced him (no doubt after constant complaints from members), but the new guy, while he does not have as annoying of a voice, is no better in the constant blathering department.
But the one thing that drives me absolutely nuts about the videos is these guys' obsession with their own ass holes. I am convinced they are actually homosexuals (not that there's anything wrong with that). The video will be going along nicely, and then all of a sudden, out of the middle of nowhere, its "lick my ass hole baby." Disgusting. Absolutely disgusting. Not to mention degrading to these women. And it lasts a LONG time too - its not just one lick and they're done - no - "more," "stick your tongue in there, baby." How these beautiful models can allow themselves to be subjected to sticking their tongues inside the butt hole of a disgusting guy is beyond me. I hope they're getting paid piles and piles of money for this. This absolutely ruins their videos for me. I mean, if it were in one predictable place, you could at least know to fast forward through it - not that that would redeem the fact that they do it. But it appears at random and there is no way to predict when you're going to get a long, detailed close up of man anus and scrotum. Without this act in their videos, I give the web site a 75. This just ruins it for me - there are no redeeming qualities to this despicable act. I feel so sorry for the models who are subjected to these animals.
Lastly, as others have pointed out but it merits repeating, these guys are chicken to have their faces shown on camera (of course, no problem putting the women on camera, but you get their faces in the shot and they run screaming like little girls). This severely limits the angles (its pov/mounted camera shot, so the angles are already severely limited). While I think they do an ok job editing the videos together, it is still a problem.
All in all, the videos are long, lots of sex, and the quality is decent. But, the incessant talking and the lengthy close ups of disgusting hairy man anus ruin it completely. Not worth the money and I would not recommend spending your hard-earned money on a membership to this train wreck of a web site.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
I would say 90% of these teen college girls are actually teens and they are hot looking girls!! I joined this site for a month, that was only because I saw a preview of 18-year-old ALEX, her tummy got smothered in cum! I had to see how that happen!! Good Missionary sex positions!!
Cons:
In my opinion, too many facials, not enough body cumshots!! The same guy doing the same thing that I don't like can get a little a boring, to the point where one month of my money is all it will get!!
Bottom Line:
If you like college girls and plenty and facial cumshots, join the site!!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Easy navigation, well labeled update schedules, no hidden costs, real amateurs, and a solid amount of back cataloged updates are all excellent pros about this site. It is just ok and could really be something outstanding in the future.
Cons:
I was very irritated to see the same woman repeated in certain updates with very little difference in the scenes. All the scenes follow the same formula which gets boring. It goes talk, toys, bj, standing on the side of the bed, doggie, anal, facial. I agree with other reviewers except I also find that the male actor is blurred out. I'm not annoyed about the guy needing the blur but it does become distracting, especially when it appears/disappears over the girls naughty parts simply because they dont know how to shoot the video from better angles and it takes me out of the moment watching the video. Would like there to be other males doing the fucking (for variety) and would like to see some creativity to the updates/girls/locations/camera angles/positions.
Bottom Line:
Its great for about a month, or until you get bored. If you like the girls on the update pages a little bit its not worth it, if you think they are really hot then it is. This site feels like it is made for the man doing the fucking, he is doing the exploiting, filming, talking, everything, and it would be interesting if they brought back girls to get degraded more/worse if they are updated/featured again, or if the guy made faces about the girls behind there backs, or fucked in a different location then that one bed, and maybe without showing the lighting equipment in the background. I like the pro/am style but it gets boring after the two months that I've been a member.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large site
- Mostly unknown models
- Models very good looking
- Lots of opportunity to see the model’s personality
- Includes two other sites
- Supports download managers
- No obvious time-outs
- Scenes are available as a single download or as clips
Cons:
- Could offer more HD
- Could offer niche tags
Bottom Line:
This site is a recipe for disaster in many ways: it is simplistic, formulaic, mostly POV-based and uses only one male talent. But in this case the site is much greater than the sum of its parts. The simple layout works in this case since the site is based around the female talent, the formula may be the same in every scene but I found that formula added to the heat in the scenes. While POV can be annoying, the male talent here must have some serious practice because this is some of the best POV work I’ve ever seen, and finally, that male talent doesn’t fall into the trap that so many other one-man-shows do – he doesn’t ever lose site of the fact that members are joining to see the girls, not him.
The glue that holds this site together is the quality of models that get recruited. While there isn’t a lot of variety, the choice of model is something that aims for the biggest chunk of the market: young, fit, petite, and usually Caucasian. I’m one of those people who like the site’s choice of models and I really like what the site has to offer. To further the appeal, the models are never caked with heavy makeup and dressed in slutty clothes. The site accentuates each model’s natural beauty rather than covering it.
A sharp contrast between this site and the sites I normally join is that the sites I normally join use the better known porn models working at the time. I have little experience with amateur sites but with very rare exceptions these are models I’ve never seen before or since. I have no idea how the site recruits the models, but whatever they’re doing they should keep doing it because it works.
The scenes all have a common theme: a ‘college girl’ is enticed to dip her toes into the world of porn. The girl’s youth and appearance certainly lends credibility to the overall theme. A viewer could really get lost in the fantasy that this is an otherwise innocent college student who is about to do something nasty for our viewing pleasure.
Many of the scenes start with the cameraman / male talent picking the model up. As they drive an interview in conducted which is usually pretty interesting. In many of these scenes the interview progresses to some nudity in the car and is often followed by some road head. In rare cases the girl will actually ride the guy while he drives. Sure, it’s dangerous, but it’s great to watch!
Other scenes begin in a hotel room but there is still an interview process.
The scenes then transition to some posing, usually some oral on the girl, oral on the guy, sex in multiple positions and finally a money shot, usually on the face. Most of the scenes then have some footage shot after the scene, which is also interesting to watch.
The site layout is simple, but simple works here. The scenes all have the same theme so the biggest difference is the model herself. I do wish that there were some tags offered, though there really wouldn’t be many. A tag for anal scenes (there are a few) would be great, and maybe even a tag to sort by the model’s age would be a good addition.
One feature that I like a lot is that while a lot of the camera work is POV, there are also two or three fixed cameras set up too. That’s good to provide some variety but the site uses split-screens to capture two views at once. Half the screen might be a shot of the model getting fucked in the doggy position while the other half is a close-up of her face. This is a great effect and really works well.
I’m not sure if this is a pro or a con, but many of the older shoots aren’t edited to vary the shots between POV and the fixed camera. Instead, they offer the full scene from either viewpoint. I’m glad they dropped this practice and started editing, but it does offer an option for viewers who prefer one or the other.
The site is large, offering about 320 scenes and it updates with one scene being added per week. Each scene is available as a single download or in clips if you’re only interested in a segment. The site supports download managers with no obvious time-outs.
Download resolutions vary. The best is 1280x720, 3000kb/s, many are 768x432 at 1800kb/s and the lowest are 640x360 at 1800. All are 30 fps. The older scenes don’t look great by today’s standards, but they aren’t bad. The medium resolution looks pretty good even though the specs would suggest otherwise. I think the biggest flaw is that the site could offer higher resolutions. Also, WMVs are pretty much all that are available.
Photos are available as singles or zips. I didn’t download much, but what I saw was relatively low resolution at 1400x788.
The bottom line is that this site could have been a total mess if any part of it was badly done, but since all the elements are well done the site is very good on the technical bits. Once you factor in the newness and apparent innocence of the models this is an amazing site that I both highly recommend and have already added to my list of sites to come back to regularly.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very few to think of. One good thing is that the women are pretty hot. That's about it.
Cons:
I don't want to re-hash what others have said. The real con, I think, is that this guy is the biggest, most pathetic two-pump chump in porn. You'd think that after having sex with hundreds of women on camera, he'd be able to last more than 30 seconds inside a girl without going off, but nope. The most recent video, he does a girl anally, spends about 17 seconds inside her butt, then gets ready to pull out. She really likes anal and basically has to beg him to stay in. This guy is really, really pathetic. This basically means that the actual sex part of the scenes are extremely short. Its like 90% stupid interview, 5% sex, and 5% him trying to keep from ejaculating. He also shrieked like a little girl when a girl squirted on him. Ridiculous. Get another stunt cock because you are really, really pathetic. Oh yeah, and as the other posters have mentioned - he needs to shut the fuck up. No one wants his inane voice in the background when they're trying to rub one out.
Bottom Line:
Bad site with talent who can't last more than 30 seconds without ejaculating. Not worth the money.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some attractive ladies
-No DRM
-Reasonable sized collection, 128 scenes at the time of review
-Interesting concept, most of the talent plays around pretty well
-Newer stuff is good video quality, 620x360 WMV with 4500 kbps total bitrate
-Download speeds are good if you use a download manager, not so great through browser (300 KB/sec browser, 900 KB/sec with manager)
-Bills through CCBill, didn't have any experience with customer service
-Exclusive content, including some ladies I hadn't seen before anywhere
Cons:
-No real navigation to speak of, just a list of the sets. However, pretty much every model only appears once.
-Site is very very bland, nothing really there except the long list of scenes (unsortable) and a link to friends' sites.
-No photosets at all
-Camerawork can be iffy, since it is mostly filmed with the combination of POV and a tripod, the angles aren't always good - and the guy sometimes gets up to move the camera around (they don't edit this part out)
-Sort of expensive given the amount of content
-Not all download managers work (DTA did, GetRight didn't)
-No bonus content
-The video quality of the older sets is pretty poor - worst I saw was 480x360 1800 kbps.
-Infrequent updates, only one per week
-Oddly the guy blurs out his face with a big blurry Japanese mosaic kind of thing, which can be a bit distracting.
-Model attractiveness is variable, and there are LOTS of tattoos.
Bottom Line:
For what this site is I think it is pretty decent. Its main drawbacks are the older content's quality, the price, and the size of the site. If they merged this site with their sister site (Exploited College Girls) for the same price, the site would defintely become more reasonably priced.
The site has an interesting concept, and there are even a few scenes where the girls decide to back out, which adds some realism I suppose. The concept for the most part is that he tells the girls they can make 1k-5k per day doing private videos for his customers that only the customer will ever see - but of course he has to kick the tires on the ladies first.
Considering the style of site, I didn't find the dude to be that much of a jackass, compared to similar sites like BangBros - where you want to strangle the dude behind the camera.
If you aren't into this kind of setup, you will probably find the site to be lacking, as the camerwork is pretty bad in places, but if you do enjoy this kind of thing it might be worth joining - but just for a month, I don't know why anyone would get their multi-month membership, I don't think you get any bonus sites with that membership either.
Basically a decent site, and he certainly got some attractive ladies - too bad about the tattoos in many cases (what is with that huge fucking teddy bear on Danni Cole's back, shit!). The ladies are mostly American from what I can tell, and not a lot of ethnic diversity here - almost all white. I downloaded about 25 scenes that I plan to keep, amongst those there are about 5 that will be added to my favorites (including the Danni Cole scene, and a Rilee Jensen scene that were both pretty good).
If you are into casting call type scenes, this is definitely a site to consider. Although it could certainly use some improvements, and perhaps a lower price, I'd say it is worth a one month membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Most of the models have a very natural "girl next door" look to them
-The acting is pretty good for a porn site
-Free access to exploitedcollegegirls.com if you remain a member for a second month
-The site sticks with their theme
-Site navigation is very easy
-Good download speeds (I got between 700Kb and 800Kb per second without using any sort of download manager or speed accelerator)
Cons:
-It costs $29.49 per month, but there are currently only 61 scenes posted
-Video quality is slightly lower than the steller quality vids that most good sites are putting out these days
-No pictures or vid caps (All videos)
Bottom Line:
This site a lot like the backroomfacial.com site that was part of the bangbros network about 6 years ago (Except this site is a little lighter on the degradation aspect).
What really makes this site great in my opinion is that they go the extra mile to sell you the illusion that the girl is just some chick looking into an add she saw and ends up getting tricked into having sex on camera without getting paid for it.
First off, most of the models look no different than the average college girl. Also, the acting was sufficient enough for me to buy into the idea that the girl does not know exactly what she is getting herself into when she shows up for the interview.
Second, sticking with the site's theme, every scene is shot in the same room, with the same guy, and he gives every girl the same spiel about how she can make $1,000 to $5,000 a day doing porn, but she has to prove she can take directions well and perform on the spot before she gets the job. What is NOT the same in every scene is how the girl reacts to this dude's sales pitch. Some girls are eager to prove they are the perfect girl for the job, some reluctantly go through with his demands, and a few even walk out on him.
Last, but not least, is the quantity and quality of videos. As stated in the cons, this site only has 61 videos as of today. The wide majority of scenes are between 20 and 40 minutes long and are between 200MB and 300MB in size. The visual quality is not bad, but not the steller quality that most sites are putting out these days. In my opinion, the slightly lower visual quality helps feed into the amateur feel of the scene. However, below are some stats from one of the vids that I downlowded to help you decide for yourself whether the quality is acceptable or not. Also, the quality of the sample vids on the preview page are representative of the quality of the members area vids.
Audio: Windows Media Audio 44100Hz stereo 96Kbps [Raw Audio 0]
Video: Windows Media Video 9 576x324 29.97fps 1100Kbps [Raw Video 1]
Bottom line, in my opinion, as far as content goes, this is my favorite site on the net today. The only reason I gave it an 89 is because I just can't justify giving a score of 90 or higher to a site that has a price tag of $29.49 but only provides 61 scenes. However, if they keep up with their weekly updates, and the quality of content stays the same as it is right now, it will be in the high 90's on my scale within a year from now.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- There's a backroom, a couch and girls wanting money or to become pornstar. What could go wrong?
- The girls are mostly attractive.
- Nearly 600 videos.
- Download speeds are good (80% of max)
- CCBill is the biller
- Some of the scenes feature good personalities.
- An update each week
Cons:
- Well, as I enter my third month with this group of sites, they've decided to take a few sites away from me. I no longer have access to Net Video Girls or Casting Couch HD, thanks guys, there's you a 15 point deduction. No explanation needed. You don't remove access to sites you were previously including. You did and that's why I removed points.
- A lot of these scenes are dull. ExCoGi was much better.
- No pictures. Why does an amateur site not have pictures?
- It doesn't feel like they put as much into this site as ExCoGi and definitely not as much as Net Video Girls.
I even made sure by trying to sign in to Net Video Girls with my credentials and it wouldn't sign in. I won't be reducing the Exploited College Girls school as I think it's a very unique and interesting site. This Backroom Casting Couch gets to start out with a -15 deduction. I don't want to go too far into the reasoning other than saying I chose to do business with these sites for 3 straight months, even allowing the membership to recur at $29.95 in the last two months of it. I could have just canceled it in month one and signed up with a promo with a different email address for month two. Their appreciation is to remove my access to the best site they have, Net Video Girls.
I'm really tired of having to write negative reviews because of terrible business practices. See, Backroom Casting Couch is not a bad site at all but now, I'm in a bad mood and feel like I can't trust them. It makes me see the faults.
My first pro says a lot. There's a couch in a backroom. The guy casts a willing amateur woman for porn. The enjoyable, entertaining style of Exploited College Girls isn't found here. The women look bored, not all but most of the recent ones, they roll around on the couch showing their 46 tattoos and it feels just as cheap as the recent women look. I'm going to be as fair as possible and say 1/2 of the women are okay. The other 1/2 should be paying me to watch them get naked.
The good looking ones are in the 8-9 range on an amateur scale.
There are no pictures. I try not to be too old-fashioned about porn but pictures of amateurs is one of the top reasons to join an amateur site. Would it really be that much to ask? I think anyone would agree the interview section of these scenes is not near as good as Exploited College Girls, another of their sites. Use that time to take 50-75 pictures. It has been a long time since I said this and maybe I should apologize before saying it. Some of these women look a lot better dressed.
If you think I'm being too harsh on the models go look for yourself. Of the last 15, Chanel is cute, Summer is cute with an even better personality, Leya and Jasmine are pretty, the other 11 are average or below. I think baseball is the only profession where 4 out of a 15 isn't terrible.
The video quality is very good with up to 1080p. The videos are long as I have explained before these long videos at a high resolution make for huge file sizes. One I downloaded earlier was 4.3 GB for the 1080p version. They also offer 720p and an unspecified resolution version that is smaller in file size. The ones I tested in the unspecified group were 768x432, so below 480p. Those can even be as big as 1 GB.
With no photos there is nothing to list about their quality.
I'm taking this directly from their site. This is one of transcribed conversations they list from one of the scenes:
Rick: I'm going to have you start by licking his ass.
Kim: What.. What??!! Are you serious?! Are you fuckin' serious?... ok, whatever..God... I don't wanna do that. I really have to do that?
Rick: That's what we do here. Welcome to porn.
We're back to way to go, guys. I think I would have edited out the part where she said she doesn't want to do that and asked again if she really has to. You walk a fine-line in this business. Holding money over someone's head to get them to do something they don't want to do isn't on the right side of that line.
I'm still not going to give it a terrible score. It has its good moments but I won't be back.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Cute Girls
Variety of Cum Shots and Types of Intercourse
Very Long Video Length
Weekly Updates
Cons:
Blurred Guy Faces
Girls Aren't Real College Girls or even Amateurs
Too Many Scenes Of The Same Girl Doing The Same Thing
Bottom Line:
Overall, I enjoy this site. I've been a member in the past and joined up again about a month ago and I'm going to go another month and see how it goes from there.
I really like that the girls are cute. That's the main selling point to this site. They really don't have any ugly girls.
You get a nice variety of sexual acts too. In addition to the main stuff in every porn video you get some rimming, some anal, some 2 guys on one girl.
My biggest Con with the site is that they're just using semi-established porn girls that you'll find on lots of sites. I wish they were real college girls or at last amateur girls but I can see where finding 4 real amateur college girls per month would be pretty hard to find so I'm give them a pass on that.
I'm not a big picture guy but I've noticed some of you are. They do offer nice picture sets of the scenes.
I kinda like the long length of the videos. They cut very little out of each shoot which can be cool but can also be sort of annoying so I just fast forward thru the boring stuff :-)
They offer two different versions of each shoot. One in POV format and one in .....ummmmm....not POV format. Not sure what to call that.
They charge $29.49 for a monthly membership. Fair deal in my book. They have 90+ scenes total so for $30, can't beat it as far as I'm concerned.
Hmmm, let's see, what else????????????? I think that just about covers everything. If you have any questions about anything I forgot to mention, just ask.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Billing is via CCBill.
I counted 487 individual girls listed, a few of them have 2 or 3 scenes, but most only one scene.
For each girl there is a short biography / description of the scene.
For each girl there are 8 to 10 large thumb-nail pictures to give an idea of what will be in the video.
Most of the girls are quite attractive.
The photos are downloaded in Zip files.
Mostly first time models.
Download manger worked (until Firefox updated and then disallowed DTA).
Cons:
The largest video format (MP4) is 1280x720, and older videos are 640x360 in WMV format.
The photos are usually just clips from the video, and are small.
The format of the videos gets repetitive.
There is only one male who is in all of the scenes.
Not a very advanced web design.
Bottom Line:
Most of the females on this site are in the age range of 18 to 21, with a few going up into their mid 20s. And many of them are small breasted, girls who are short and light weight. If this is the demographic that you like, then this is a great site to see these girls. Most of the girls are ethnically white, with a few Latinas and a few African Americans.
The man who is the male talent does a good job of focusing on the girl, his goal is to make her the real star of the show.
The format of almost all videos is an introduction section where we get to know a bit about the girl, what she likes, what her sexual experience is like, and what she likes to do. Many scenes start with the girl being picked up in the car at the airport, and often giving road head and they drive to a motel room for the video filming. We often see the girl applying make up, and changing clothes. Then some time sitting on the bed showing her boobs. The scenes usually proceed to a the male using a dildo or vibrator to get the girl off, often a BJ is next, and finally full sex in multiple positions. There is a mix of “money shots”: the guy jacking off on her face, the girl jacking him on her face or in her mouth, and some of them end with cream pies.
I think for me what I like best is that the models appear to be real first timers who either want to get into the porn business, or more likely are doing this for some extra cash. We get to see young, pretty, semi-innocent girls, and we get to know them a bit.
I could not decide if this is a pro or a con, but many of the videos are quite long in the 45 minute and over range. With many of the girls this is a plus, but sometimes it gets a bit slow and I wanted to skip ahead.
The male talent always has his face hidden and out of focus, but for me that was quite ok, as I am watching this for the lovely young ladies.
He usually has three cameras going at all times, two are fixed on tripods to get a bit longer view, and one is for POV and close ups. At time the girl will hold one camera.
Four linked (bonus) sites are included with this site, but can only be accessed through ExCoGi via a link. The sites are:
Backroom Casting Couch
Black Ambush Net Video Girls Casting Couch HD.
This site assigns a random letter/number user ID and Password at sign up time, be sure you save this as it is difficult to remember and you must use the assigned values, you can not change them. The sign in screen also requires that you enter an “I'm a real person” string of numbers each time you sign in.
If a site with this format, young innocent college girls doing their first porno, interests you, as it does me. Then I can recommend this quite highly. I even renewed my membership for a 2nd month, something I seldom do.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Large collection (Over 400 scenes)
All college aged models
Mostly attractive models
Mostly exclusive models
Access to a couple of other sites with similar themes.
Cons:
Photo images sizes are small
Identical format for each video can be monotonous.
Seems like one guy just recording his conquests...
Navigation is very basic
Bottom Line:
I apologize, but I cancelled my membership here before I had a chance to collect stats and do a review. Here's is what I do have.
This is obviously a "college-girls paying for tuition" site, real of fake, I can't tell. The videographer/blurred out male star of the scenes travels to different colleges and records his meeting with, conversing with, squeezing, fingering, often jamming a sex-toy into and ultimately fucking and then coming all over the young, relatively attractive girl in each scene. Being relatively attractive is kind of easy when you are in the most admired demographic on the planet (18-22 female), but a few of these girls are truly beautiful. There are many scenes, although only the recent ones are in HD (720p) and the oldest ones are an unwatchable resolution like 640x480.
The newer scenes alternate between POV and fixed camera off to the side. Some of the POV and POV-like (i.e. camera at foot of bed recording a reverse cowboy) material is quite good, but much of it is jittery and the field of POV view is limited.
Some of the scenes have a split video (POV and from another angle) which I personally dislike a lot. I do not recall any issues downloading the videos or zip files. Images are small, like 1200-1400 pixels on the wide-side small.
The network includes a "casting couch" site, and a "broke model" site. Both of these sites followed a similar, narrow scenario which made me immediately fast-forward in search of the good stuff. There was also a site called "net video girls" which just seemed like a lot of unrelated amateur nude-model stuff thrown together like a slightly pornographic subreddit.
Bottom Line: There are a lot of sites that use this format but this one is as good as any of the others that I've seen, perhaps a little better. So if you like the format, you have nothing to lose by signing up for a month...well...except for $25 if you really hate the site.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Over 150 models.
Most of the models appear to be real amateurs.
Many of the models are very attractive.
Exclusive content.
Some of the models were recorded with two different cameras at the same time allowing you to see both views.
The newer videos or good quality
Cons:
Many of the older videos are very poor quality
Camerawork is poor
Price too high
Whenever you see the guys had he blurs of his face which is distracting
Had a hard time downloading some of the videos
Poor download speeds
Bottom Line:
I join the site primarily because of the simultaneous multiple camera angles. Lots of the newer stuff had that option, but a lot of the older stuff did not. Overall, I enjoyed the content and most of the girls were attractive. I was disappointed in the amount of models not available in multiple camera angles. I was disappointed in the video quality of most of the older models. I did not like mind that some models are available in one download format, while other models are available in a different download format, and other models available in multiple download formats.
The price of the site should have been either a lot less or should have included the sister site backroomcastingcouch.com.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Been a fan since before they went on a hiatus. Since they've been back they have been the best site out there IMO.
Jovan Jordan is a stud and the girls they bring on are in shock when they unpack him but are immediately turned on and all the scenes are amazing. Not to mention he creampies almost every one of them. All amateurs, some better looking than others, but the sex, reactions, bts is all real and amazing.
Overall amazing site, best out there.
Cons:
Bi-weekly updates. Before the hiatus, updates were weekly, its hard to wait that long for more when the girls seem to keep getting hotter.
Bottom Line:
This site is hands down my favorite and if you like interracial surprises, creampies, and amateurs this is the best mix of them all!
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
The concept of the site is cool as hell, the intros add to the general feel and add a touch of realism.
Updates especially when the site launched were absolute fire. The Layla scene is still one of my fav scenes period. The female talent is more hit than miss which is great.
Cons:
Overuse of Jovan in all new scenes. I get they had male talent issues before but they need fresh male talent on the site to keep it going.
For me what’s makes blacked/blacked raw /dogfart/ brothalovers awesome is they use different male talent with the females.
Alternatively rename the site Jovan Ambush.
Bottom Line:
This site has so much potential! All other reviews feel the same, little tweaks here and there BUT definitely one of the better IR websites on the market.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 500 videos in total with updates coming in about once a week. That said a lot of the older scenes are pretty poor quality, so I'd say you get around 200-300 good quality HD videos. Around 350-370 of the scenes have some anal if you care about that.
- Almost entirely amateur models, some of the girls in teh first videos have gone on to shoot other stuff but lots of girls I have not seen on any other site.
- For the most part really attractive girls with a very distinct "girl next door" look. The models clearly do their own hair/ makeup and choose their outfits because it ranges from really sexy well put together outfits to girls that look like they rolled out of bed and threw together whatever they had around. Overall it's kind of a nice change from the polished look of some sites.
- Network access to a handful of similar sites, most notable ExCoGi and Black Ambush.
- Decent preview, that gives a decent idea of what you get when you sign up.
Cons:
- The premise is really not that interesting. The whole spiel is that the girls come in for an interview and they get "tricked" or lured into having hardcore sex with the promise of "high paying porn jobs". The models don't seem to buy it (most just go "ok, whatever"), the guy running the interview isn't particularly convincing, you, as the audience roll your eyes and skip forward in the interview. I don't get why they keep it up instead of just doing regular casting videos. I feel like at this point it's just annoying.
- No photos of any kind
- Site is pretty bare bones. I have been an on and off member since 2010 and the site looks the same now as it did back then. Actually I think they added some more ads for other sites. You only have an option to download videos in 2 sizes, the category section is pretty simple and while everything works there's not a lot of extra features.
Bottom Line:
If you are considering this site and are really concerned about the price I would strongly recommend you read pat362's expired review, while there are more videos now, a lot of his negative comments still hold true. The site still has the silly premise of "tricking" girls, the interviews can be hit or miss depending on the girl, the videos are still shot in the office with the black couch and so on. (Although for the last few years they started using another male model "Vince" who seems to be doing a much better job switching positions and fucking the girls energetically).
IF you are looking for really professionally shot videos of dolled up models this is not the best site for you. The girls here are clearly amateurs and sometimes the interviews are painfully awkward (on the flip side you get some really cool girls that are very open and uninhibited) The camera work is really good for a small site, but it's clearly not the elaborate production of a large network, and on the technical side the site is alright, but won't win any design awards.
All that out of the way, this is still one of my favorite sites. The models are absolutely awesome, even the awkward ones :) they don't put on fake porn moans, they are wearing their regular clothes, sometimes they get into the sex, sometimes they are clearly not that interested. As far as unscripted sex it's some of the best stuff I've found. Sometimes a girl really gets into the anal action and sometimes they end the scene pretty quickly after that since she clearly said she's not interested, almost every scene has a different vibe and while pretty silly the interviews before and after the action are sometimes awesome at showcasing the girl's personality.
Now, before my final paragraph I have a final disclaimer. As some other people mentioned the action is a bit formulaic and I honestly wish they had a bed so they could get more creative, but generally each scene follows the following format: 8-10 minute interview and intro, the girl strips and masturbates (depends on the girl how long) Vince usually helps her insert an anal toy or eats them out. Then she gives a blowjob for a few minutes and they have sex on the table in doggy or with the girl on her back, then there's a pause while they get ready for anal and the video shows a side-by-side view of the insertion and the girl's face. They move to the couch and either go at it in anal or have a cream-pie. The last 2-3 minutes are the girl dressing and/or an exit interview. All in all each scene is about 30-50 minutes. For me this is not a downside, but it depends on what you're looking for. It's definitely not focused on long blowjobs, rough sex or intense anal. If you're looking for one of those niches there are better sites out there.
So overall, while the site is clearly not for everyone there are some awesome scenes here with some very natural models and unscripted moments. What sold me on it were all the anal scenes, but what kept me subscribed were the great models and genuine reactions.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Black Ambush is an amazing site, with frsh talent never before seen on the internet.
The girls are convinced they are there to have sex with the producer/cameraman, but at around the 20 minute mark, they are introduced to the talent they will be working with: a big black guy with a big black cock!
Usually the scene then goes to dick sucking, licking out, then sex in various positions.
Most scenes end in a creampie, which I love.
Cons:
Sometimes there's not enough post-creampie pushing and cum eating.
Sometimes the angles and scenes can look a bit similar. A bit of variety in how they are shot, and what gets done with the creampie would be great.
Sometimes the looks of the girls can be a bit hit and moss. There are some "bigger" girls on the site, but at least they are fresh and you'll never have seen them do porn before.
Bottom Line:
Bottom line, this site is awesome. It is unique and a great place to see never-before seen amateurs who are dirty! Watching a small white girl take her first black cock is something special, especially when he cums inside her.
Definite amateur models and a black couch that’s in the backroom.
Models are mostly pretty and a lot of them, especially newer ones, are funny and cute. There are over 700 models.
Scenes are full featured, is that a term? Interview, tease, sex, it’s all in one scene.
Updates a little more than once per week, I’m counting around 6 per month.
Good blend of models (race, body types, kinkiness level)
Cons:
It's similar to Exploited College Girls, there’s really not a lot they are doing wrong. They do have a download limit listed, but I haven’t hit it. It looks high to me with 25GB per day. I’m not a hoarding downloader. I download what I know I can watch.
Shouldn’t it be repetitive if the women are amateurs and new to the porn field? There seems to be a line you can’t cross with newbies to porn modeling. I think the viewer accepts that to get to see new, fresh models.
Bottom Line:
These two sites – Backroom Casting Couch and Exploited College Girls are a real find for me. I seem to only want to stay in my comfort zone of mostly glam, softer content and it’s not for lack of trying. I have tried many hardcore sites and wished I hadn’t. These sites walk that fine line between, “You’re trying to see how much of her innards you can pull out” and “That’s just two people have fun, passionate sex.” It may be because I’m a woman. This site does it as well as Exploited College Girls.
The models are probably a bigger deal to females than males. I know that sounds dumb since I’m not a lesbian, but it’s not just about looks. I think as a woman, I want to think young women just kind of stumble into porn. Like I did the backseat of that guy’s car in college. These scenes give me that feeling. The ladies do a good enough job of showing up in what looks like a casual outfit for a job interview. The guys are not enough asshole to make me feel like they’re really trying to exploit these young women. As I told in the Exploited College Girls review, the girls wear the guys in the newer scenes. It’s nice to see the shift happening in porn. It didn’t have to be a major shift. It could be progressive to show women can be horny too. It does make me laugh since these guys are handing money out. Maybe someone could make a porn site where they have a bet with the woman. If they can get her to have sex without pay, then she won’t ask for pay. You know the webmasters would be all for that. They’re placing personal ads for smooth-talking men. I have always believed that pay takes away from the realism in porn. Maybe everyone does have a price. That is where typical hardcore does not do well with me. I start thinking there’s no way she agreed to this. She’s just doing it to get her money. That loses me. This site and Exploited College Girls, don’t give me that feeling.
The scenes can be downloaded in HD. There are pictures. The navigation is basic and simple as it should be for a site like this. I find looking at each woman to be one of the most interesting parts. A lot of these women do not look like they have plans to be in 10,000 porn scenes. I do believe the most interesting is when you get the woman that looks like she shouldn’t be in porn, and I mean that in the way that she looks like a potential Hollywood actress. You also get the other side of that woman would probably shoot a new scene every week.
The tags work well even though I don’t use them. I just start at the beginning and pick 6-10 scenes to download and watch over a week period. I think considering they give you this site and Exploited College Girls this could be a long term join for me. If you combine the sites, they are updating 12 times a month and have over 1,500 scenes between the sites. They do give you a third site too. I haven’t checked the third site out just because of the name. It’s Black Ambush. That has the sound of every site that has turned me away from hardcore. I will eventually check it out, but for now I’m happy with Exploited College Girls and Backroom Casting Couch.
I would definitely recommend joining either and getting both to any porn fan. I did score Exploited College Girls a little higher, but you get both sites so there’s no reason to prefer one of the other when you can have both.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
