Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Back Room Casting Couch

Back Room Casting Couch (1)

Active
68
pat362 (367) 03-16-12  06:11am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Content is all exclusif.
+there are more than 190 scenes.
+The vast majority of the girls are amateurs and this is one of the few places you'll see them do hardcore.
+They have a wide variety of teen models.
Cons: -They don't seem to updating very often but I can't say how often they do because they don't put dates on their content.
-The videos can only be downloaded in WMV and resolution is a rather poor 640x360.
-All the videos are shot in POV and the guy doesn't really know how use a camera.
-The interview part of the video is a complete waste of time and pure BS.
-All the scenes are shot in the same office and on the same couch and desk.
-There is no editing so a good chunk of the video is the guy moving the camera or tripod around the room.
-The sex is mediocre at best.
-Still no pics of any kind.
Bottom Line: *I only joined this site because I got a deal when I joined exploited college girls because you also get this one. This is my second time on this site and it will also be my final time.

*The premise for the site is very interesting and someone with talent should be able to make a killing but the guy responsible for this mess either doesn't have any talent or simply doesn't care about the final product. You would think that someone who's been doing this for as long as he has would get better with time but I did not see a difference between the newer videos and the older stuff.

*All the flaws that were there in 2010 are still there. You have the stupid interview where it's hard to believe the BS being said. You have his hiden face whenever it's in the shot. The videos are all POV and tripod shot so that's already a negative. There are many bad camera angles, weird cut in the action, bad camera position during the action so that the shots are wasted, he likes to talk during the video.

*Shooting in an office environment with a chair, desk and the typical casting couch is such a bad idea because the room is small, the performer is never really made comfortable and this nis especially true during the sex because she will either be on her back on the hard desk(no padding of any kind), bent forward over the desk or having sex on the sofa which happens to be a few feet in front of the sofa whcih means that you can't really use the tripoid appropriately during what should be the most comfortable part of the video for the girl.

**It's hard to recommend this mess to anyone but anyone who wants to see amateurs have sex and don't really mind if the sex is badly shot, not very intense, where the male is not a good sex performer and where each video looks like the previous one might get something out of it. Everyone else should stay far away.**

Reply To Review

Review Replies (11)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

rearadmiral (316) Pat - I normally follow your advice and I'd probably avoid this site but it is a niche I'm interested in. You say that you got a deal through your membership at Exploited College Girls. What is the deal and does it look like it is something offered all the time?

Thanks

Excellent review!

03-16-12  08:30am

Reply To Message

2

Capn (28) A great shame there are no stills here as it is a topic that is of interest to me.
That said, I have to commend a site for specialising either to video or still photography as they are 2 entirely different areas of skillsets.

Cap'n. :0)

03-16-12  08:58am

Reply To Message

3

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #1 - rearadmiral :

It used to be that you had to join both sites seperately if you wanted to get access to both but they increased the price on ECG by about 10$ and gave their members access to both sites. If you enjoy the content on both sites then it's a great deal because it's 35$ instead of the 50$ you'd have spent a couple of years ago. I don't know if it's a temporary thing but the deal has been there fr a few months already.

I'll answer your other questions at the same time and say that there are no pics on any of the sites. All the videos on BCC are shot by himself so the best you could get would be screen grabs from the video camera but the quality would be awful and the reason is the same as for why you will never see HD content. The cameras he uses look like models you can buy at Best Buy so I don't think they are professional models needed for quality pic grabs. It's about the same thing on ECG but I think the guy could still take a few pics because the content is a little different. Mind you ECG uses the same type of cameras so quality is not likely to be any better.

03-16-12  09:50am

Reply To Message

4

rearadmiral (316) REPLY TO #3 - pat362 :

Thanks pat. I see the price is listed as $35 at TBP but they don't say that includes an addition site. It makes sense that it does because otherwise that seems like a high price for ECG.
03-16-12  10:05am

Reply To Message

5

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #4 - rearadmiral :

The only way to see the backroom casting couch offer is on the sites join page. I checked my past charges and that's why I know that it used to be 25$ for jus this site. of course it would be better if they offered the two options so that you can get just this site for 25$ and 35$ if you want both.
03-18-12  09:06am

Reply To Message

6

rearadmiral (316) REPLY TO #5 - pat362 :

Thanks again, pat. I know your don't rate these sites too highly, but I think I'll give them a try soon.
03-19-12  02:51pm

Reply To Message

7

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #6 - rearadmiral :

I hope you enjoy them and I look forward to reading your review.
03-19-12  06:09pm

Reply To Message

8

bestimmt (2) Very well written and reasoned review. Couldn't agree more with everything you say. Not worth the money.
10-28-12  06:16am

Reply To Message

9

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #8 - bestimmt :

This site has two things going for it. It features girls that would normally never get seen if it wasn't for this site and a tiny amount of them will shoot a few more scenes for other sites/companies.
10-28-12  08:30am

Reply To Message

10

bestimmt (2) REPLY TO #9 - pat362 :

Oh I don't disagree at all. The women are beautiful and are, in my opinion, the one good thing about the site. I have to wonder how many promising young porn actresses we lost, though, because this two-pump chump was their first and only porn experience.
10-29-12  10:26pm

Reply To Message

11

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #10 - bestimmt :

Probably very few and only because I believe he shoots girls from the mideast or midwest. These girls probably never planned to go to the East Cost or West Coast anyway. The site is designed to make it look like he's a kind of dick but the shoots themselves aren't very hard for the girls. I mean it's a one-on-one sex scene with no one else in the room and the guy isn't carrying a deadly weapon in his pants.

If you want to see a site that has managed to destroy possible porn careers then check out facial abuse. Many a girls made the mistake of thinking that these guys are on the up and up and the claim of abuse is just for show. They are in many ways what Max Hardcore was in the last few years before he went to jail.

10-30-12  03:59pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.