Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Updated:
02-02-1207:48am (Update History) Reason: I have had my "fears" confirmed. there is nothing waiting for me in the near future. I felt that I should close the review. It saddened me.
Pros:
- Content is (mostly) original (although some of the material appears to be taken from DVD releases).
- Material is uncensored.
- If you are keen on BBW Asians, the models are genuine BBWs, and most are from Asia, generally Thailand.
- ~35 High Res Photo-sets (1339x2000px) - All available as zipped archives for easy downloading.
- Website is quite professional looking, and slick.
- Signing up with XL Asians gives access to the AsianWhorePass (Siam Slam, Asian Baby Makers, Bangkok Street Whores) and AllAccessJapan (Forbidden Tokyo, Jgirl Adventures, Japanese Juggs) sites.
- Most videos may be downloaded as WMV in reasonable quality (not HD but im fine with that).
- The Thai BBWs are really something, if you are keen on that kind of thing, as SSBBW/BBW Asians are not that common outside most of the (*irritatingly censored*) Japanese material. Its good stuff.
- Some of the material on some of the affiliated sites is also excellent.
Cons:
- Images are all watermarked.
- Updates presented as "upcoming" are iffy at best (I watched some of the "upcoming updates" at a friends place in January 2011). They are simply a ploy to attempt to cover up the fact that new material is not being generated, and has not been for some time (as evidenced by an old review (of over a year ago) reporting almost exactly the same content as I am seeing currently).
- Small number of videos available (fewer than 20) with only 14 available at initial sign up.
- Japanese material appears to be DVD ripped.
- Most of the video material at signup (10/14 videos) is breast play/groping (not my thing), the hardcore material seems to be mainly in pictures.
- The softcore does not contain any masturbation scenes, which I find dissappointing.
- Videos are, primarily, streamed and watermarked However there appears to be a problem when using Firefox/Aurora, IE works fine.
- Videos are 620x416 and do not "blow up" brilliantly.
Bottom Line:
I have attempted to be as even handed as possible with this website so first up there are good points. Most of the BBW material is to the best of my knowlege, genuinely original and of good quality. And if you are keen on Thai BBWs, they are worth it. Although there is little hardcore, and the site's marketing seems to have relied heavily on hardcore pictures rather than actual hard-core video content. Personally I would absolutely love to see more content of all of the models on the site if it were available. I should also say that the affiliated sites also have some high quality, good content as well.
On the down side, however, I do not like being decieved by a website, and while I cannot be 100% certain that the owners and moderators of this network are being deceptive, I get the *feeling* that they are. It seems that rather than producing new high quality content, they have put down an initial investment, and then once people have been convinced to join, they are encouraged to stay by the slow drip of already made material. It appears to me that In order to get the full gamut of material from this network, one needs to remain a member for at least three months (If the "release" dates of the "updates" are to be believed. Some being listed as not to be released until *exactly* three months from sign up).
I also have a bit of a beef with the watermarking system in the videos. The watermarks in the video shift around the corners throughout the course of the video. I find it quite distracting, as well as every so often, a screen saying "XL Asians" pops up in the middle of the action. Also quite distracting.
The videos themselves are of reasonable quality, however they are not high definition. Many are quite short, and while they look good at their standard windowed resolution, when full-screening them, the effect is not as pleasant, there is a degree of pixellation. There being only 4/14 hardcore/Softcore ((NOTE: see above for a current number)) videos was a real blow.
The picture-sets ARE of high quality. If the images are downloaded individually, they are also individually watermarked with your IP Address, Username, and date of download (to prevent sharing). However this is not the case in the zip archives.
I was disappointed by the content over all. While I am happy with the Softcore stuff, groping really is not my thing. It may be someone elses thing, although sadly, it is not mine.
I would only recomend this site if there were specific things that you wanted from the affiliated sites as well as XL Asians as a whole.
Final verdict - Caveat Emptor, these guys have sold the sizzle and the sausage is rather mediocre. This site (and the network as a whole) seems to have been designed to milk paying customers not to provide new and exciting content.
((PLEASE NOTE: in response to a reply))
In the interest of fairness to a reply. Some of the photo updates are now from October of 2011 (as of 9/Dec/11) according to my EXIF reader. Although there is still a better part of 6 months where nothing has been published. And I still stand by my original review in spite of comments. At several months in I have not seen the upcoming updates. I will also accept that new material is being produced NOW. We are up to 24:49 Vids:Photosets (9/12/11) for those who would be interested (As of 3 months of membership). Of these 9 are hardcore, and of those, 4 hardcore vids are DVD material (see the entire content of: "Japanese Whale Hunt" from Third World Media.)
I do note that I have removed a comment about cams as they function, not that I care. HOWEVER: I stand by my review: Having spent 3 months at the site. The hardcore is really few and far between: none in the forseeable future according to the site future. If you like "groping", go for it. For me: I am not keen. I am going to remove my subscription. I like video updates, a site that provides a puttload of photo updates is not something I'm so keen on particularly not if they sell it (or seem to) as videos. I am certainly not keen for this site for the amount that the site is charging.((/NOTE))
((NOTE: Upon resigning from site)) At four months in: The content is exhausted (not one *single* update pending for several weeks now. I had been holding out for the "updates" on the other affiliated sites which also now have no pending updates). I honestly feel fleeced, however I decided to obtain the whole set in spite of some of my comments above. The site is Shonky IMHO. I have decreased my initial rating on the basis of feeling cheated. And I do so sadly. The site concept is great, there is a niche out there, believe me. There are plenty of people who would love to see heavier women from Asia enjoying themselves fifty-seven ways from Sunday. This site does not deliver in the long term. Nor do its affiliates. They thrive on attempting to squash porn piracy (all against it) rather than making porn worth sticking around for. (//NOTE))
:END
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Updated:
01-04-1201:45pm (Update History) Reason: Rewrote review on the basis of negative trust rating left on my profile
Pros:
- Nikky looks fantastic with a nice, slim figure and fantastic natural boobs and a great ass
- Nice mix of content with majority being photos and videos, but also a few webcam shows too
- Nice amateur content consisting generally of BJs with a few sex scenes, footjobs and tit jobs
- Everything is downloadable, and there are ZIPs of photo galleries
- Good customer service - got a message from webmaster when I cancelled membership asking whether I was a satisfied customer and wondering why I cancelled
Cons:
- No longer updating (despite saying 'regular updates' in the preview pages
- Not much personality to the site, very little dialogue (might be because she's not as fluent in English as French, though)
- Not as much content as some other websites
- Navigation is pretty basic, but this isn't a huge problem as there's not terrabites of member content
Bottom Line:
I think it's fair to say the preview pages on Nikky's website give a good idea of what content is in the member's area, and aside the fact the website is no longer updating, it really is a great website. The only negative point in this respect is that it says 'regular updates' and sadly that's no longer the case. Clearly that's a bit misleading.
The member's area is pretty easy to navigate with content divided into Videos, Pictures, Webcams and Bonus content.
There is also membership to 7 bonus websites, most offering several models covering a niche (anal, clits etc) but also Briana Devil, another solo model. You have full membership to all these websites, although one, (blowjob related I think) seemed to be dead.
Picture content is pretty modest, there are a few blowjob galleries, but most are solo with her either playing with toys or (more often) posing. Some galleries are shot outside which I always enjoy, several of her in the snow stripping down which is great.
Nikky I think has an outstanding body, really outstanding. I wouldn't describe her as pretty, but she definitely has a distinctive look about her. She's actually French-Canadian, and most of the text on the website is in English and also French.
Photos and Video content are all shown with a thumbnail and a rather generic scene-setting introduction. The galleries are thumbnails with pictures measuring about 1600px on their longest side. Quality is good and the pictures are pretty well shot. They have a small watermark in the corner, nothing major.
ZIPs of the photos are available under bonus, so if you want the galleries in their entirety, head straight to that section rather than graze through the actual galleries.
Videos are downloadable as WMV files. Most range from 50-100mb, a few are larger. The videos are only about 640x480px but the quality is fine for an amateur website.
Content-wise Nikky I would say about 65% of the videos are blowjobs, 10% sex, 10% other (handjobs, tit jobs, footjobs) and 15% solo masturbation.
Nikky uses the same male talent throughout the site. It's hard not to sound gay when saying this, but he's pretty well endowed and shoots a good load. Her facials are really good, and I really enjoy her B/G content.
She does a good tit job too, there are several footjob and handjob videos. Most of the videos follow a familiar formula of her posing etc, starting a blowjob/footjob/whatever, stripping and finishing off the job. Having said that, her videos definitely aren't generic or repetitive, certainly not compared to some amateur websites.
There are about five downloadable camshows. These are generally solo stuff with her on a bed. Nothing too exciting although probably enjoyable when she did the shows live (which she no longer does).
This is a good amateur website. I really enjoy amateur content, and the only thing that would keep me from rejoining is that it no longer updates. Nikki is a great performer, and although the website is a bit soulless for an amateur website, I definitely enjoyed my membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
01-02-1207:33am (Update History) Reason: Changed review on the basis of negative trust rating left on my profile
Pros:
- Tia is very hot with athletic body, large (fake) boobs and a very pretty face
- Good mix of content - movies and pictures
- Lots of niches and fetishes catered for - B/G, G/G, blowjobs to anal with anything in between, gangbangs and orgies
- Fairly good update schedule for Tia, and also updates for other sites in the network including Asian Sex Club, Tera Lee, All Asians, Filipino Fuck etc
- Navigation is pretty good and you can sort updates in different orders (by date, title etc)
- Members can now rate updates and leave comments
Cons:
- Not all exclusive content which means quality is inconsistent, ranging from good quality photos to screengrabs from movies
- Video quality also varies, and you can't tell filesize until you download (it does have running time on the update though)
- Not much in the way of introduction for videos/updates, but not a big problem as you can view a Flash video before downloading
Bottom Line:
This is a pretty large, comprehensive website, and caters for possibly the largest range of niches and fetishes that I know of from a solo website.
Tia Ling seems to try her hand at pretty much anything. There's inter-racial, blowjobs, footjobs, handjobs, masturbation, orgies, gang bangs (one of which she gets 10 facials), anal and also domination if that's your thing.
This is Tia's website so she appears in pretty much all updates, but there's a few guest stars, plus daily updates from the network her site is a member of. Honestly not many were particularly of interest to me as I'm generally a fan of solo sites, but if you like Asians, Filipinos etc, then this is obviously a huge selling point.
Tia is a constant in updates (obviously), but there's a lot of different male talent (and female talent too, of course). There are a few solo videos of Tia, also 'fan fucks' which frankly I'm always a bit cynical about, but it's obviously a different guy and adds to the variety. I know a lot of people don't like seeing the same guy in every video, so the fact there's a lot of guys at Tia's disposal is obviously a big plus point in that respect.
Navigation is pretty much as you'd expect. It has vastly improved since I was a member 4 months ago, and all content is downloadable. You can download WMV files (most seemed to be in the region of 100-500mb) and ZIPs of photos. I am normally only a member of one website at a time, and I cannot afford to stay a member of every website that doesn't let you save content, so it's really good this has been changed.
The updates are displayed as simple thumbnails with the title of the update, a 5-star rating which you can contribute to, and how long the video is/how many photos there are. Future updates also appear at the top of the page to give you an idea of what's to come.
If you hover over the thumbnail, it scrolls through 5-or-so different screenshots/images to give you an idea of what is in the update. The only problem I've found is that if the video is long, it only shows scenes from the first half of the video, so it doesn't necessarily give an accurate representation of what's in the video. But there's a Flash version of the video online, so no big issue.
When you click on the thumbnail you have the choice of playing a Flash version of the video or downloading a WMV (in the case of videos), or browse through thumbnails or downloading a ZIP (in the case of photos).
The Flash version of the video is good in that you can click anywhere on the timeline while it's loading and it will skip to that point. It's like Youtube in that you don't have to wait for the entire video to load before being able to skip to the middle and end to see what the video's like.
Most of the recent videos are excellent quality, with older videos being more inconsistent as I think some are from other websites that Tia's done shoots for.
Photo-wise, you can browse thumbnails, view them in a slideshow or download a zip. There are watermarks, but generally not too intrusive on the larger images, but obviously are proportionally larger on the poorer quality images.
Image-wise it's a mix. The proper photos are really good quality, very sharp and very clear. These are very good. Gallery size ranges from 40-200 photos.
But there are a fair few galleries comprising of screenshots - these range from adequate to poor in quality. I personally think updates like this could do with being separated from the main photo updates and maybe clumped with the actual video updates. It's not a huge issue to me as the good quality photos are there, and the good quality videos are there, it's just the screenshots kinda dilute the photo offerings somehow.
Other features include the ability to sort updates by Most Recent, Most Popular (as scored by members) and by Title Name. You can also add tags to updates, but I'm not sure if this means you can then view by tags.
There is a search box at the top where you can type in the name of an update etc, but also select the category (Lesbian, BJ etc), and the site (network-wide or Tia's site). Unfortunately leaving this blank and selecting 'Blowjobs' and 'Tia Ling' doesn't seem to display all Tia's blowjobs, but admittedly this could be a work in progress (hope it is, as it will really improve navigation).
Finally, there's a basic bio with her vital stats plus turn ons/offs, store (autographed photos of Tia etc), Tia's wishlist (from suitcases to lingerie!) and FAQs which touches on the essential things like how to cancel membership etc.
'Live Webcam Shows' is currently unclickable and coming soon, so hopefully that will be live soon (will update if it does become available).
Tia's website is really good. It has a huge mix of niches, lots of large videos and lots of photos. Navigation is FAR improved but could be slightly more refined here-and-there, plus I think keeping the poor quality screenshots separate would be another positive step to take. Well worth joining!
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Updated:
01-02-1203:33am (Update History) Reason: Changed review on the basis of negative trust rating left on my profile
Pros:
- Curvy Latina who's easy on the eyes with nice (if fake) boobs
- Excellent BJs, loves swallowing, so great for people who like that niche
- Lots of different genres catered for; handjobs, BJs, sex, footjobs, solo etc
- Very good customer service, they always reply to emails from my experience
- Seems genuinely interested in interacting with members - lots of polls to establish what people like, always replies to comments left on updates
- Easy to navigate in a blog format with tags so that you can browse by niche, user ratings on each update, thumbnail galleries with each video
- Good blog that has been consistently updated with candid photos from Chica's various trips/nights out
- One update a week which includes video and photos. Very reliable with a long history of updates
- Videos available in two different sizes (LD and HD), also embedded as a flash video on the site. Photos downloadable as ZIP files
Cons:
- Older updates only have a single thumbnail preview (as opposed to a gallery of thumbnails plus embedded Flash video)
- If you prefer H/C sex then there's probably other sites. She does do sex scenes, but the majority are BJs
Bottom Line:
This is definitely one of my favourite websites to be a member of at the moment.
It has the positive qualities of a smaller website to keep me interested; good interaction from Chica, good customer service, apologies *if* an update is going to be late (can only remember this happening once).
It also has the qualities of a major website, such as well-shot videos, good quality content, polished navigation etc. It also has years' worth of content.
I love BJs and softer stuff like that, and if you're the same as me then this website is really outstanding. If you like what Chica looks like from the previews, then you will love the website.
If you prefer harder stuff, then her website might disappoint, but she seems to listen and respond to requests, and there's so many years' worth of content that for a one-month membership there should be more than enough to whet your appetite.
Navigation-wise, it's very much like a blog. The website preview is good in that it allows you to see how often Chica updates her site, so it's clear even before joining that it's always updated.
Each update will have a short written synopsis about the update, plus an embedded flash video which you can now skip to any point within without it fully loading (much like Youtube). Older updates don't have this functionality so you have to wait for the entire video to load.
The embedded video is good in that you can skip through it to see whether the video is worth downloading.
There are three different options for downloading videos: for the iPad (M4V, approx 125-150mb), Low Def (WMV, approx 75-100mb) and High Def (WMV, approx 300-350mb). File sizes given next to the download link.
For the majority of updates, there's also a thumbnail gallery with anything from 30-100 pictures. Some galleries are a bit small, some are fine, but photography is always top-notch. All galleries are downloadable as a ZIP.
All updates are navigatable in a blog format with each update essentially being a post. You can click on tags underneath the update to see similar updates, so you can see all Facials, BJs etc.
Older updates unfortunately just have a short text intro and a thumbnail preview of the video. It's not a huge problem (many sites still ONLY have this) but obviously it comes as bit of a shock having been so spoilt elsewhere.
Now and again Chica will have guest videos which are generally the same kind of fayre that Chica offers. There don't seem to be as many of these lately, but you can find them easily when you browse the different genres anyway.
So, if you want a website that is high quality with an amateur feel, then Chica's Place is hard to beat. I've yet to find a website that's still updating that comes close to ticking all the right boxes for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
11-28-1112:56pm (Update History) Reason: 28/11/2011: Downgraded by five points. Renewed membership is disappointing because so many sites still update in DVD quality and worse.
Pros:
The dirty sister of 21Sextury with lots of contents even after it split off. Today (8th August) 21Sextreme lists 5120 scenes as well as 2032 models in total.
36 sites in total. 18 primary sites and 18 bonus sites.
Will appeal to the pervert in you with plenty of fetish material. This may not be to everyone's liking but they even list 7 Trannie sites as well as one gay site (highly unusual in most “straight” networks.) Not to forget my personal favorites, the “very” mature sites like “Lusty Grandmas,” I believe there are at least four sites like it which counts as a plus ... however, see below.
New picture sets are available zipped in regular size, as well as in Hi-Resolution at 1696x2544px, while the scenes are being offered in medium wmv and mp4, high wmv and mp4 (720x540 with a 3500 bitrate) as well as in two HD sizes, 1280x720p and 1920x1080p.
21Sextury and 21Sextreme excel when it comes to quality because even the non-HD scenes are quite watchable even in full screen.
Cons:
While updates come regularly, an average of 11 updates a week is a bit meager for a network of 36 sites. This is because many of the sites stopped updating some time ago and others update only infrequently.
Our users should also be aware of the fact that not all updates are in HD because some of the sites, even though they are still active, have not yet switched to the higher grade material.
Especially galling for me is the fact that only one mature site updates on a weekly basis while the others are slumbering, awaiting a wake up call by the site owners. You might find that this is also the case in connection with your favorite niche!
Bottom Line:
All in all I like this “darker” sister of 21Sextury a lot. I never did visit the individual model sites as well as the more “glamorous” teenie sites all that often in the olden days, so, to me, the fact that they split into two has actually encouraged me to concentrate on the rest of the 21Sextremes contents more closely and I like what I see.
For the fan of the unusual, this fetish site will be quite satisfying. For a low price you will get a satisfying share of lesbians, trannies, grannies, granddads and BDSM and some other kinky stuff, with even a gay site thrown into the mix, and the technical quality of the more recent material is great.
28/11/2011: Took out a new subscription and noticed how many of the prime sites are still updating in an outdated format. Today's update was marked HD but the quality is far from HD like. This update does not even look like DVD quality as it is blurry when viewed in full window. This is the case with many updates that are not marked Super HD. So, high quality updates are fewer and farther between than I thought when I first wrote this review. Downgraded by five points.
- Good speed download, different video options (mp4, wmv, HD videos only for recent ones, iPod, mpg, single clips)
- Good surfing ! For each scene you have: preview, pics, screen caps, trailer, comments, clips...
- Good monthly price
- Regular daily updates (only for half network)
Cons:
- Download limit of 10gb daily (per site) makes impossible to dwn (and storage) or watch the HD videos (2 Gb size each) ! It is a nonsense...
- There isn't the size of the video files (it would be important with the presence of the daily limit)
- RK HAVE TO EXPLAIN IN THE NETWORK HOW THE DWN LIMIT WORKS (because without sense in one day you can dan more than 10gb files from more sites, and other day NOT). WHY ?
- A lot of sites aren't longer update (half of the sites of the network)
- In my opinion, the US-niche sites of the Net contains only few anal scenes...
Bottom Line:
It is a huge network collection of AM and EU videos/pics ! There are about 30 sites but I've joined the network especially for some of those sites: Pure18, Mikesapartment, Welivetogether, Eurosexparties, Cumfiesta and Firstimeauditions that in my opinion worth the price of th entire Network.
At the beginning I was in doubt if join or not the site cause of the "download limit" of 10 gb/daily that the Netw impose for each site of the Net.
That is if you download/watch HD videos (about 2 Gb per video) it is very annoying, but if you download only the mp4 or wmv "midsize" videos (about 3-600 Mb per video, 768x432 format) you can see all the collection in two-three months !!
Yes there are a lot of amazing contents !!
The quality of the HD videos (only the most recent, 2011-2010 nd half) is very impressive, but you can collect only the most beautiful video in this format....(in my opinion) cause the limit of your personal storage size !!
I said that there are 2-3 site that are very very amazing !! That is Pure18 and Welivetogether; in my opinion they are the most worthy sites of the net. They deserve theirs reviews that I'do later....
But in few words: Pure18 i impressive for the girls. All the girls are very young, US-girls, semi-pro or at the first appearance but very very skilled !! Welivetogether is a lesbian site and it is very impressive for the variety of the scene-locations, for the climax (the most video are 3 way lesbians), and for the kind of shoot (few toys, a lot of wet kisses and tongues, tongues, and a lot of tongues...).
The prices is good and it is right; I think that the Huge Network can't have a high prices cause it is impossible to view all their video collection in 1-2 months; with low prices you easy going on join the site for the time you want without spend an exaggeration !
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
09-21-1101:12pm (Update History) Reason: There are 155369 pictures to be exact.
Pros:
Very High Quality.
Updates Very Often.
Original Content
Fast Downloads
Decent Pricing $24.95
Cons:
Navigation is ok.
Not Really Hardcore, as more Erotic then Hard Core.
Although there is Full Sex, Anal etc.
Very Much Like X-Art !
Bottom Line:
Good Site, Lots of stuff. The quality alone is worth a peak at this site.
Will I rejoin? Not sure as some stuff becomes semi-repetitive, this may appear this way to the lighter type of hardcore. Very hard site to review. Because its great in many areas, but hard to grade it.
The Stuff:
Over 1300 videos about 30 minutes each (download and stream)
DRM: No restrictions
+ Full Movies, Multi-Bandwidth
Format:
WMV Flash (640x360)
QuickTime
DIVX
Pictures:
Most photo sets contain 80-90 individual pics and each one is perfect — great lighting, excellent composition, and showing you exactly what you want to see in long shot and closeup.
Over 15000 ( correction 155369 ) pictures " wow"
+ Fullscreen pictures, Zip archives
Extras:
3rd Party Feeds, Model Index, Message Board, Blog, Interviews, Live Chat.
Movies:
If you like girl/girl, you are going to love Viv Thomas. This site has a huge amount of girl/girl scenes, but more than just volume, they just know how to do lesbian sex right. The winning formula seems to be: find two hot girls who like each other and let them enjoy themselves.
Boy/Girl. Erotic hardcore,straight and anal.
both types start off light and then get down to business.
Originality:
Beauty of this site is it is 100% original stuff.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Updated:
09-19-1109:30am (Update History) Reason: Further editing to keep updated reivew within 60-line limit.
Pros:
UPDATED FOR SEPT 2011 WITH NEW EXPERIENCES!
* Good concept - straight guys interviewed for porn and you often see them on the sister sites.
* Going since 2005 and has hundreds of men and videos
* Roleplay is often surprisingly convincing, and many of the guys do appear genuinely straight.
* Lots of sexy British guys but also good selection from around the world.
* No DRM, all downloadable for keeps.
* Mac Friendly.
* Unique Content.
* Some bonus content from sister studios - CFNM, CMNM, Straight Hell and Brutal Tops
* Cool "Groping Hands" scenes add extra spice.
Cons:
- NEW UPDATE SEPT 2011 "Second Audition" concept hot but only 1 video so far a month from launch. Still no new "Groping Hands", and no new guest studio stuff since May 2011.
- Expensive - $39.95 first month, then $34.95 p/m
- Recurring billing has to be manually cancelled
- Site is chaotic with few search options.
- Majority of early 2005/06 shoots are photos only. Most shoots to 2009 haveno streaming.
- Camerawork can be shoddy
- Very "samey" - little variation in each video.
- Little feedback - no forum, can't rate/comment on most videos
- Choice of tiny 480x270 "standard" video or small 640x360 so-called "high quality" WMV files, though newer ones also have Quicktime MOV files at 850x480
Bottom Line:
First Auditions is a pretty unique site. Many cater for the whole "gay for pay/auditions" thing, but this site does it in a uniquely sexy, degrading way - and you see which men made it to make porn for their other sites.
All the models are "straight" men who are supposed to be auditioning for porn - so far, so normal. This site is unique in that the men are interviewed clothed, then made to strip and pose in the most undignified positions by a fully clothed gay cameraman, who asks probing questions about their personal lives and how far they'd be willing to go in porn with other men.
They're also great at finding men who are hot, but who come from a wide range of backgrounds, really do look like ordinary guys and really do look (mostly) straight or bi-curious - these guys are real, not models and haven't done porno before.
They also have the "Groping Hands" concept - each guy is made to stand and be groped and felt up by male hands - the men themselves are not seen. Later, they have to be strapped in a examination chair with their legs spread to take a dildo up the ass, then be masturbated until they cum. There's a hot little scene at the end where they ask them if they feel ashamed of what they did, would they suck a mans cock for money, etc. which is really sexy.
It doesn't sound like a lot - there's no actual sex happening here, but it's refreshingly new and works well. The majority of the guys appear convincingly straight. They are made to pose, answer questions, be measured and weighed and generally pretty well humiliated.
Groping Hands is the best part of the site, but seems to have been introduced for 2010 and then dropped. The camerawork can be shaky and shoddy due to the guy having to film and interview and touch the guys all at the same time.
The organisation is a bit chaotic and whilst they now allow you to search by models nationality, you can't search by age etc. There's some bonus material from their sister sites - especially good for us UK viewers who get to see some from sites supposedly not available in the UK!
UPDATE 19.9.2011
I rejoined First Auditions when they added a new "Second Auditions" feature, which involved persuading the models to have sex with men, doing all things they said they wouldn't do in their "First Audition" interview. It sounded kinda cheesy as a concept but when I joined the first "Second Audition" video was extremely hot, but after a month it remained the only one of the site - all the updates after that were standard First Auditions.
As they've stopped the guest studios and Groping Hands, and don't seem to be committed to the new Second Auditions feature, I was very disappointed as Second Auditons was my only reason for rejoining and they made such a big deal out of it.
The updates have also become less frequent and more erratic - you more often wait a whole week The quantity is dropping off majorly too - I noticed in March 2011 there were no less than 19 updates - on average more than every 2 days - but it steadily declined from then on - 14 in April, 8 in May, 7 in June and July and a dismal 6 in August - and when I left the site on Sept 18th they'd only done 4 so far that month.
The best content was always the more unusual Groping Hands, Second Auditions or even guest studio stuff - the plain old First Auditions are as samey and dull as ever. Now they're focusing almost exclusively on that and doing a lot less of it, I feel they've just given up on this site and are doing the bare minimum to keep it going.
I've downgraded the site to a 69 from 75. It would be even lower but it's worth joining once just to download the archived Groping Hands, guest studio and (one!) Second Auditions stuff - but then cancel your membership - nothing more to see here!
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Updated:
09-08-1109:34pm (Update History) Reason: Who knew I could become this disinterested in naked chicks? Whatever kind of help this site needs, my money definitely can't provide. Avoid for now.
Pros:
- Well organized, easy to navigate
- Massive amounts of content collected over many years
- Wide selection of females, many of which are harder to find on other porn sites
- Wide selection of photographers
- ZIP downloadable image sets
- New, customizable layout
Cons:
- Some girls may be too hairy for some
- Lately the hottie-to-bland ratio has gone downhill
Bottom Line:
O.K. I've been frequenting this site regularly since 2004 or so, soon after discovering ATK Galleria. I'd say for every 2 months spent at ATK Galleria, I spend one at Natural and Hairy, just to see what's new while letting new sets accumulate at Galleria.
This site is definitely worth joining: there are some serious hotties there, many "bookstore"-type chicks without getting into cartoon makeup territory. I recommend this site way, way, way above Suicide Girls. They're new layout is incredibe, btw.
However, as a longtime fan, I must agree with the recent reviews here - it's in a mild slump. Some of these new girls can be rather uninspiring. I don't care if she has hair - she still needs to be cute and NATURAL. I have pretty chill tastes concerning women (I don't mind tattoos, I LOVE short hair, etc), but freaky doesn't always mean better. Let me add, a lot of people here love the photographer Sean R. I like him, but I prefer BMB, Afterglow, and Atomic W. Sean R gets cuties, but shoots too many contorted crotch shots for my taste.
In summary - I always come back to this site and stock up on the new cuties that don't look like dive bar sailors. I'm usually bored by the time my subscription expires though, at which point I rejoin ATK Galleria and rejoice at the abundance of NATURAL beauty! Call me old-fashioned...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
08-26-1105:51am (Update History) Reason: Minor score change in light appreciation of hardcore material
Pros:
- (Almost) daily updates
- Zip sets
- Recent videos are 720p
- Most photo sets have matching video
- Good quality photography
- Many well-known models
- Notes on shoots, and links to models' sites
Cons:
- Picture resolution of 1600px could be better
- Style arguably a little generic
- Some overuse of retouching and/or makeup
- Inconsistent/unhelpful naming of zips
- Often daft music in videos
Bottom Line:
Here's another site that's been on my list for a while and was accelerated - this time by getting an email from them with reduced pricing. The Randall name is familiar - I remember seeing Suze Randall's name on many photoshoots in, er, reading material procured in my youth, and while still going strong, Holly has been continuing very much in her footsteps.
The members area - although a little busy with a few too many ads and affiliate links - is good and informative. We have the expected timeline of all updates, model index, and separate photo and video lists, as well as searching by categories in each. It looks like there are approx 350 photo sets and 250 videos, and growing quickly with maybe 5 or 6 updates a week.
Some other features I like include:
- notes from the photographer on each set/video
- matching photo/video sets for each shoot, it's good to see both sides
- the model index has links to the model's sites - although I see quite a few missing there
- a fairly active forum, a good dialogue with the photographer
There are also links to the other sites in the network included in the subscription; about 15, a combination of solo model sites (including the ubiquitous Faye Reagan) and live/recordings-of-live videos of interviews and photo shoots. They may have some appeal to some; the one that mainly grabbed me was Forever Vamp, which I'll review separately.
So, generally, a good site, although I have slightly mixed feelings about the content. It inevitably draws comparison to Stagg Street, which I reviewed recently; both are sites of female glamour photographers, and in fact there are many of the same models and porn stars featured on both sites - including a few popular fetish/pinup models which was one of the main lures for me here.
On one hand, this is the better site; I found Stagg Street lacking in many areas - mainly fairly low-res pics and lack of zip downloads, the only videos there are low-res behind-the-scenes - fun in themselves, but of limited appeal.
On the other hand is the material - here is a bit more explicit, which is certainly no bad thing; we see sets and videos of masturbation, with fingers and toys; and some hardcore material which, although generally not my thing, is enjoyable, well-executed and well-balanced between the guy and the girl involved - likely as a result of being the work of a female photographer.
But at the same time, to me it's a mainstream, centrefold style of glam, that's arguably a little generic - admittedly with very good photography. To my eyes, Ms Stagg, although less explicit, takes many of the same models and gives them more personality, uses more inventive lighting/clothing/sets, and focuses a little more on the alt/pinup/fetish genres. However, that's very much a personal preference and this is still a good site - recommended if the material appeals to you, and as such I find myself scoring it a little higher.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
08-21-1104:03pm (Update History) Reason: Split movies in g/g section plus .. see below!
Pros:
1384 beautiful, natural models.
Latest movies are available in Lo, Regular, High and HD. High is very good at 1024x576p while HD is at 1280x720p and also very nice and crisp.
Pictures are available in two sizes, 3888x2592px and 1470x980px, zipped. The sets are huge but for those who think less is more there are also “the best of” reduced sets available of the same models.
I love the fact that so many pictures and videos are heavily tagged, it really encourages one to browse and I've come across some incredible material via the tag method already.
Homepage layout is a joy, even giving one a preview of what's to come for the whole month ahead complete with samples.
Download Manager friendly, plus ample bandwidth given to the user. I downloaded 5 videos at a time and was still able to move freely around the site and even watch smooth streaming while downloading.
Download speed for me was over my max at 2.3 MB/s, either for one file or for the five combined.
Cons:
I am looking hard for one! Oh, yes, b/g content .. I hate it. Will be a plus for others so will not count against the site.. In any case there is not THAT much of it, so I'll find it easy to avoid it.
I'm also not particularly keen about the “rump” shots found in many of the picture sets. I would prefer to see more of the model than just a picture of hip down to top of upper thighs.
When considering the first 100 I ever gave a site please be kind and remember that TBP states that site "could do little to improve" and I agree with that wholeheartedly.
Bottom Line:
I know that a lot of us were discontent and disappointed a while ago because many movies took too long to get to the point, but I don't find this to be the case this time around.
All the videos I have looked at so far take me back to my first subscription, and to the awe and delight I felt in connection with this site. Except that this time around the videos are in one piece and in HD and the picture sets are awesome in their Ultra High Resolution size.
AW appear to keep improving with age and don't look (judging by the updates) as if they have any intention of slowing down in the foreseeable future.
The girls look and act so incredibly natural and appear to enjoy themselves so much that I am almost reluctant to describe this site as a porn site even though it was given an award by AVN.
It was my favorite site then and is in danger of quickly becoming so again.
What happened to my love of older women and fine lingerie, you may ask?
Well, this site is so enchanting that I don't find it hard at all to forgive them the lack of the above mentioned, and give AW the highest mark I've ever given anyone.
No glamour, no excessive make up, no porn star mannerisms here, just young women of all stripes and sizes who are highly erotic to me because of the fact that everything they do seems so unstaged and natural.
If the discount through TBP is still valid I would strongly recommend the “three pack” of Abby Winters to all of our users who prefer wholesome and natural.
August 21, 2011: Have reduced my score of 100 by five points because,
a) as I found out in the meantime, not all movies are in one part. In the girl-girl section they are still as a rule in four parts: "before, part 1, part 2, after." I would like for at least the main action to be in one part only. Before and after I can do without.
b) this past week's updates were exceptionally bad, in MY eyes I agree, but that's the only way I can judge a site.
Because of these two factors I have reduced my score slightly from 100 to 95.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
08-12-1106:49pm (Update History) Reason: Problems with canceling
Pros:
- A site based around mostly amateurs, the female orgasm and real masturbation. As a plus, if you have a wife or girlfriend, that likes porn, you also get access to their site that is focused on male masturbation.
- Price is good through TBP
- Newer videos are 1280x720, will further this in BL
- Newer pictures are near 3000 long end and come zipped.
- Taking a shot at around 400 models, surprisingly, for an amateur site, nearly all the women are attractive. I think that's a big plus. Even the older (mid and up 40s) models that would normally not appeal to me, do here.
- Call it a pro or con, there are some pornstars on here. Ramona Luv seems to have been on nearly all amateur sites in 2004-06 and she's here, Aaliyah Love is here as a guest model, I don't mind them, but some might. I would love to see more Ramona.
- Decent search, it works, but the whole navigation of the site could be updated, reminds me of Little Mutt in how the site works.
- Very good download speeds
Cons:
- The videos are not that clear, not even the 1280x720 ones. It could be lighting, could be the amateur "effect", but the older videos are hard to watch on a big monitor.
- Inconsistencies, one model, Isabella, has a high video download option, it's 720x480 and a bit blurry. A newer model doesn't have high video download option and the medium option is clearer than Isabella's high option.
- If I could convince them of one thing, please stop the video from streaming when I click on it to download. Firefox users should turn to No Script, trust me, some of these videos are orgasm focused so there's nothing like one starting and a loud moan roaring through your house at 4 in the morning.
- My main feeling here in the cons is that it needs updating, not the actual content updates, but the site. It took me 10 minutes to find the download link for photo sets.
Bottom Line:
We had discussed a little about this site being like I Feel Myself. It's not a lot like it, but it does have short 40-60 second videos of the woman's orgasm face that are spliced from the actual full body videos. So if you're into I Feel Myself and just seeing the face during orgasm, you will like those, I really didn't since they are so short.
Next up, interview videos. They're everywhere. Since they don't an interview tag, I scanned through the videos archives and these interview videos look to come about every 5th update. I really don't like interview videos and they take up the space of an update too. I do understand the use of them on a site like this since it's more convincing that these girls are not pros, but the pros have ruined interviews for most of us. For what it's worth, most of the girls on here seem genuinely sweet and playful.
I don't know what the deal is with the videos not looking good.
But wait a minute, the content is really good. If you're into strip, tease, which I am, you may not like these videos. There is almost no tease, it's get naked, masturbate for 7-10 minutes, orgasm. This isn't as bad as it sounds. It does add to the girls probably being filled with anxiety, nervousness. Some of the girls are much more confident and have more fun with it.
The unusual masturbation techniques used in some are interesting, erotic even, but I'm not for sure how sexually arousing they are to watch. Maybe that's me, I don't find a girl rubbing her clit against the corner of a bathroom sink to be arousing. I'm guessing what is being shown here though is that this is how the girls are comfortable masturbating. I don't believe there is a fake orgasm on the site. You get some squirters, some that make a milky mess in minutes and what I think they have going for them the most, the girls are really good-looking girls. There are few here and there that don't really appeal, but most look like regular, cute to really pretty girls.
They're all not skinny or in perfect shape. I was really surprised that I liked the 45 year old Barbie Lynn's bathtub shoot. I think they are going to sell most of these models on being real, erotic instead of drop dead gorgeous.
These are the numbers I'm coming up with based on their search engine.
Nearly 1,000 videos, and as said earlier the interview ones and short orgasm face ones are included here. Still, the site has grown since I was last on it. From the way I read it, they had several sites and decided to put all the content on them on this site. I don't remember them having over maybe 400 videos last year.
I will say they could be more clear about what you get. When I click "our sites", it shows me having access to the male masturbation site Club Stroke and having access to Whispering Lily, this is a community site that has a forum, shows the new updates at Yanks.
This is where it gets confusing. Also listed in "our sites" is Solo Touch. This shows as being a male and female masturbation site. Well, to enter it, I have to register a profile on Whispering Lily. When I go to Whispering Lily it says that all their content has been put on Yanks or Club Stroke, so I have no clue what this Solo Touch is or if its female content is already on Yanks.
A little frustrated that some of the models only have pictures. I understand that not all are willing to do videos, but I still want to mention that to potential members. Another frustrating one that I think is very important, some of the picture sets are only 15-25 pictures. Again, I understand that those are older sets.
May sound like I have mostly negative feelings here, but it's not true. The frustration comes from how good this content is and how much better it could be.
They stick with the solo theme really well. There are even dozens of videos of two girls masturbating together, but not really touching each other. This is a whole other level of erotic since you get the feeling they are drawing some inspiration from looking at the other masturbating. A few do go into girl/girl and those scenes are really good if you're into lesbian porn.
Updates don't seem to follow a set schedule. For the last month there are 25 updates, those 25 breakdown like this, 8 photo sets, 10 masturbation videos, 5 interview videos and 2 of the orgasm face only videos.
Overall, I really like the site because of the models. I will be keeping the majority of what I download, which is rare for me. And it's nice in a way that the videos are short 7-10 minutes, even at HD, are only 200 MB or so.
On recommending it, if you need tease in every video then maybe not. If you're looking for something different than the normal porn these days, this site is highly recommended. I think it's much better than I Feel Myself and would compare it more to Little Mutt or maybe even FTV in some ways without the glam. I would recommend it. I'm enjoying it and it will slip into my normal rotation of sites. More of Ginger P would be nice too!
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Updated:
08-08-1108:00am (Update History) Reason: just thought more relavent info would help.
Pros:
+ Content added daily
+ Video download & Mobile streaming quality can be as high as 720p/MP4 (HD)
+ Streaming quality as high as 540P (Web HD)
+ Large catalog of content
+ Broad range niches
+ Large number of top notch directors
+ 1,072 photo sets available(as of this review)
+ High Value cost through Porn Users
+ Good download & streaming speed
+ A few times a year they have a bonus day where multiple titles are added
Cons:
- Slack online management as in:
- Has "Add Your Comment" link but they NEVER add a comment (have made many personally).
- scene descriptions have "Starring", "Category" & "Director" which on older content is sorely missing or mislabeled.
- MANY older EA titles missing
- Older content isn't HD
- Only 2 formats - wmv & mp4
- My personal bone is the use of the descriptor "deepthroat" on some directors' scenes which do NOT measure to the accepted standard of the word as popularly defined by Ms. Linda Lovalace. To bang the top of the throat because she can't get it further down, due to either her gag reflexes or the size of the instrument (or receptacle), is NOT deep throating. Maybe throat gagging or throat banging but NOT deep throating. Capice?
Bottom Line:
This site has a lot of directors (and their fetishes) from Jay Sin's extreme evil anal (lots of anal on this site) to Jonni Darlko's deepthroat extravaganzas. Yes it does have some kink factor niches, like Joey Silvera's she/male obsession or Belladonna catering to the foot crowd. Plenty of girl/girl, gang bang, anal excretions (no skat), rough sex and Euro romping. Other notable directors include John Stagliano (Buttman), Rocco Siffredi, Jake Malone, Manuel Ferrara, Nacho Vidal, Mike Adriano and, while her titles have not appeared on the site yet, the newly added porn feminist director/actor Bobbi Starr.
One of the things I especially like about some of the directors is their accessibility in interacting with their fans and taking suggestions from them to create new projects (notably Jonni Darkko). [One such example was the inclusion of Rebecca Blue in TF3 when suggested by fans on another (un-named) forum].
Once a member, they will offer you access to Live Shows - and while I have never taken them up on this, I believe some of it to be free and others an extra $ item.
While other people want more for their $10, at a 1/3 the cost of a regular membership, I personally think it's a bargain able to fill the fetish needs of any reasonable person. In looking at their published numbers, they have 4,915 "straight porn" scenes (as of 8/8/2011) and 296 "shemale/tranny" scenes (about 5% of the total scenes available).
One would find that it takes six months or longer for most of the new EA releases to make it from DVD purchase to scene download. For instance, J.Darkko released Suck Balls 11/19/4 2010 but the first scene doesn't appear for download until 8/11/2011.
I recommend it highly which would really give it a 90 but for some reason doesn't seem inline with other reviewers numbers.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
08-04-1111:20am (Update History) Reason: HD is no longer available
Pros:
-All exclusif content.
-They currently have 114 videos and these can all be downloaded in WMV 640x480 2300kbps as well as HD 1280x720 5400kbps.
-All the girls appear to be unknowns and they are all cute to drop dead gorgeous.
-You can stream videos in 512x288, 740x405 and 1024x576.
-Most of the videos have a little synopsis of the scene.
-Videos are well filmed with good camera angles and there is actual sex sounds instead of music or silence.
Cons:
-Quite a few of the performers have tattoos and the placement is less than desireable.
-The interview part is sometimes more BS than possible truth.
-Navigation is basically pages at the bottom of the screen. You have a couple of search options but none of them seem to work.
-The male performer(s) are used as stunt cocks because you never see their faces. That limits some of the shots that can be used.
-For whatever reason some of the videos can only be streamed.
-There are no pics on this site.
-Fan mail section of site is disturbing and only makes the site owner appear like a douchebag.
**I'm adding this to the Cons because I can download the videos in HD but the site still states that only premium members are suppose to have access and I'm not one**
Bottom Line:
-The site reminds me a lot of exploited college girls but better filmed, far better sex scenes and better looking girls. Those are all great things but the one thing they have in common is the way they treat the girls in the synopsis of the scenes. There is a certain level of disdain and disrespect in the words used. This is even more obvious in the "fan mail" section of the site because all it is are request from the girls to have their videos removed for different reasons. Of course this disdain is not anywhere in the videos so can be overlooked as being someone idea of a joke.
-This is a very good site for anyone looking for new/amateur girls making their first foray in the porn biz. They may be new to porn but they are definetely not new to sex because the scene are for the most part really hot. Ashley is the only girl on this site that I'm aware that as done other porn shoots.
**I'm again adding a warning about HD videos. I can download them from the site but I don't know if it's a glitch or a change of policy. My hope is that it's a permanent change.**
***I've amended my score to reflect that the HD videos are no longer available. For whatever reason they were available even though they clearly state that these are only available to members with more than one month membership.
When I first joined the site***
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Updated:
07-17-1105:41pm (Update History) Reason: Wanted to add more detail
Pros:
Has potential. Not much airbrushing.
Cons:
Over the top photo editing. Diminished detail due to photo editing.
Bottom Line:
My biggest gripes are with the:
1)pic's quality 2)photographers who ruins the pics (content) with way too much editing 3)whoever directs the poses, setting, lighting, etc.
Photo editing / manipulation. So often I ran across photos that were over edited, they were edited so much that I couldn't edit them to make them look better on my computer. These photos were so much that the models hair would have no detail and would blend in with black backgrounds. There would be deep dark shadows on their skin ruining details. Too much editing takes away detail. Natural photos are wonderful.
There were plenty occasions that some of the models had unnatural colors. Such as, red or orange skin. They looked more alien that natural. Those were mainly older pics, but some of the newer ones had similar features. I think that was probably due to editing.
Poses / Setting...ect
For the most part, every model has the same expression. All they do is smile, some smile really hard. Nothing wrong with smiling – but they need to mix it up. Like: frown, smile, no expression, lick tongue out. Most importantly, try to look sexy or nasty.
The same hair style, especially on the black woman. A model will have 10 different photo shoots and will have the very same hair style on every single shoot. Example: Amber . Mix it up for crying out loud. I don't care if they wear a wig – just mix it up.
Every photo shoot should have at least one good shot with great clarity of:
1)(full body nude shot with good clarity/detail) standing or lying down
2)(boob shot) from the waist up to include the cute face of the model
3) (vagina shot) model laying down on back with legs spread open, but also with her face in view without being out-of-focus. Kind of like a missionary pose.
There were some many times that I was waiting for a good shot of a model with legs spread, but I was left dissapointed because the model would have her hand covering up her vagina on 10 pics with none of her fully exposed. It's ok to tease, but show me what I want to see somewhere in there.
Quality:
The are times that you want to see a model nude laying on her back, but on ATK they would either have the vagina in focus with the face out of focus or the other way around. Very frustrating.
Sometimes there are pics put on the site and the whole picture is out of focus or with the face blurry as if the photographer or the model was moving while pic was being taken. Why would something be put on the site like that.
The lighting in much of the photos is so bright that I cannot see any detail off the boobs. This is mainly for the white woman. A good photographer can compensate for that during the shoot.
Wide screen pics. In these days computer monitors and TVs are wide screens – not square.
If a model is sitting against the wall with her legs spread, why would you clip off the legs. The full pic would fit perfectly on a wide screen tv. Legs are nice – don't take them out of the pic.
Why are there so many pics of just one body part? So many times while I'm looking for one good pic of a model that I like, I can't find one, yet there's 10 pics of her leg, foot, or of a single tit.
Other:
There are two different sign-ins for the forums and the actual atk photo site. What gives? If I want to comment on a photo, I don't want to have to log in to a different site.
There should be a link were we can ask a question directly to the photographers or at least were we can give feedback. There should be an option to comment on a photo or photo sets while viewing it without having to go to another site.
The entire site needs a new design. I have never gone to a porn site were everything seems old. The navigation is terrible. The site seems like a forgotten site where no one cares to update it.
Every single gripe that I wrote about are wide spread throughout the website – yes every single gripe!!
I just had to write something about my experience there, because I believe the site has a lot of potential, if only they would work on these issues that I wrote about. Every single gripe that I wrote about are wide spread throughout the website – yes every single gripe!!
***Please give access to more than one ATK website with a membership, or at least offer a big discount to second website. I think membership would then go through the roof****
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Updated:
07-10-1108:23am (Update History) Reason: Decided 79 was too generous given massive flaw on site
Pros:
* Loads of exclusive content
* True to CFNM concept - most CFNM sites aren't
* Handsome models, good range of guys
* Surpisingly well-acted by male & female models
* Really good range of imaginative scenarios
* Streaming and downloading options
* No DRM as far as I can see - but see review for full details as there are some issues here
* British-based with mainly sexy British guys and women
* Lots of content suitable for gay male viewers too
* Regular updates
* Lively user forum
Cons:
- Very pricey - $39.95 first month, then $34.95
- Recurring subscription - needing manual cancel.
- Usual chaotic site design from this studio.
- No access or discounts to other sister sites.
- Some videos only available on sister site - costs same again to join, not updated, uses intrusive DRM AND expires downloads after 30 days!
- Forum interesting, but no feedback to comments, though some evidence they do read/act on them.
- Many of the stories are photosets only in basic galleries - no way of knowing which ones will be video and which photoset-only.
- Could do with some slightly older guys.
Bottom Line:
Another potentially awesome site from this studio that gets the porn so right but basics so wrong!
First the good - CFNM.net provides the absolute best, most imaginative, well-acted scenarios with great models. No other site comes close - period.
They understand the CFNM concept perfectly. Clothed Female/Naked Male means just that - the women's clothes stay on, fully, all the time - and are attractive without being so revealing that the women might as well be naked too.
I know I'm writing from a gay man's point of view, but to me, those sites miss the point. The clue is in the name- it's about men being shown off naked for the enjoyment of clothed women.
There's two camps with CFNM - some focus more on humiliating the men and some more on him showing off and enjoying it too. I like both - but prefer the former which this site does lean more towards. It provides a good choice though - some confident men, most humiliated but in a teasing way and some more hardcore with some moderate S&M.
I won't dwell on the usual flaws from the studio - crap search, chaotic layout, and very expensive.
However this site is unique in one famous problem. Apparently it used to have all the content, then they spun off all the video content to a sister site, CFNM.TV, so you had to join both sites - no discount - to see the video content you used to get from one.
I've been a member of this site and CFMN.TV and it seems that they spun off about 30 titles to CFMN.TV but then had partial change of heart.
CFNM.TV hasn't been updated in ages and CFMN.net now seems to get videos posted on it again - but the best videos remain on CFNM.TV. You can't even just sign up to CFMN.TV once to download them becuase they have vile, intrusive DRM which deletes downloads after 30 days if you leave the site, and won't work on any other OS than Windows.
This, and their odd policy of some scenarios having video and some not, means you can see a great story only to find it either has no video, or the video is at CFNM.TV.
If they'd just admit their mistake, close down CFMN.TV and make the videos non-DRM on CFMN.net I'd rejoin like a shot - despite the flaws I'd gladly pay just for the quality of the content.
A deeply flawed site I so want to love but can't!!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
06-29-1104:18pm (Update History) Reason: Speed is generally much better than first experienced. And the longer I am with this site the more I discover its depth and how much I like it!
Pros:
+ 7250 DVDs, 62000 Videos (Scenes).
+ 1080p HD Videos (251 at present).
+ 59 Extra Sites.
+ Good Navigation.
+ Speed is good for me most of the time but tends to fluctuate.
+ Zipped Picture sets.
Cons:
- Very unfriendly when it comes to my Firefox DTA, speed tends to be blazing at around 4MB/s but will shut down every 20 seconds or so and report a server error until I click on resume.
This forces me to stay with the download all the way. Downloads are fine with the ordinary Browser Downloader. At first I experienced much slower speeds but this must have been a fluke because now they do approach my maximum speed.
- Many videos are only available in avi, or mpg format but wmv is also available, except for the HD content which is in mp4.
- Talking about HD, I think most people would not even be aware that there is such a thing. I stumbled across them by hitting the "advanced search" link and seeing 1080p HD listed right beside the small window listing "videos" on the new page.
- Had to sign back into the site twice in the space of an hour.
Bottom Line:
I like this site. It has plenty of good stuff, some of it previously unseen by me and that's unusual for what is primarily a DVD (Video) site. Especially a site so closely related to Videosz.
HD videos are of nice quality!
Their ordinary videos are not bad but could stand an upgrade. By comparison to other DVD sites and this, strangely enough, includes Videosz, they don't appear to be quite as sharp and clear.
But I am only a couple of days into my subscription so maybe I have just looked at the wrong videos so far.
It requires a bit of time to get used to the basic lay-out of the site but what's wrong with clicking a few buttons to see what's behind them.
Picture sets are generally small and taken from the beginning of a video shoot. They are, however downloadable in High Resolution at 1600x1200p size. In other words better than the general vidcaps.
All in all a good subscription at a fair price through TBP. Recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
06-18-1109:27am (Update History) Reason: I rejoined the site and I find that their updates have slowed.
Pros:
-Acces to 5 other sites with one membership.
-All the girls are popular newbies in the porn world.
-All videos come in 3 formats: iphone 480x320,
standard AVI 1024x576, and HD MKV 1280x720.
-You can stream the videos in Flash.
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a single zip file.
-Content is dated.
-You can use a download manager but are limited to only 2 and sometimes 3 downloads at a time.
Cons:
-This is a very small site with only 24 videos.
-They now appear to only update with one new video every month.
-Some of the content on the other site might have limited appeal.
-Many performers have the same first name only. The people behind this site have simply added a number to their first name ie: Lena 8, Lera 5 and so forth.
-You can only download about 2 videos at a time and you cannot surf within the site or network until one of the downloads is complete.
Bottom Line:
-This was a small site within a network of 5 other sites in January and at the time I gave it an 85 for potential but the network has not gotten better but worse. Most of the other sites except for pickupgilrs almost never update.
The theme of the videos are mini gangbangs with one girl and 3 guys. Anal in all of them with most getting a dp.
-The first 8 videos were all shot outside and that is consistent with content shot in the summer or early fall while the most recents are all inside and that makes sense as it is winter overthere.
-The 35$ join price may be a little too high for what you will get.
-It's hard to say if this is now a network worth joining because of the update schedule. In January I would have said yes but now it's not so clear. You should only join for what you will find on this site and the others within the network and not for what might be coming up in future updates.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
06-15-1102:24am (Update History) Reason: Original score increased by 5 points to take into consideration the new site design and additional bonus sites added to the network.
Pros:
TBP/PU Discount join price of $19.95
No regional pricing
Some bonus sites included such as Rachel Aziani, Lexxi Tyler, Dakota Rae Patrick, Racquel Devonshire and Amber At Home.
No separate login required for bonus sites
Mostly exclusive content
Large archive going back 10+ years currently 1168 movies and 1392 photo sets
235 mostly US based models
Daily updates
Content dated
Nice sized 1200 x 1800px photos since around 2008 and updates prior to that still a respectable 933 x 1400px
Zip downloads and slide show feature for photos
Choice of download options and streaming for the videos
Cons:
Unfamiliar billing processor
Watermark/site logo on photos could be smaller
Photo sets released over the last 6 months now have 2 watermarks, bottom right corner and another half way up the right hand side which IMO is over the top
Aziani branded clothing
Ads in the member’s area
Some errors, e.g. missing zip downloads, thumbnails and photos that don’t display
Those looking for hardcore action will find little of interest as this is probably around 95% solo action here.
Too many fake tits (personal preference for the natural look)
No photo zips in the bonus sites which makes them of little value to this photo collector
Bottom Line:
I have to admit I was hesitant about joining this site due to Denner’s previous review mentioning the billing system being too complicated to cancel the rebill but on the day I went to join I guess their regular billing system must have been down because I was directed to CCBill so I went ahead and signed up with confidence.
Aziani is a multi model site, not to be confused with the Rachel Aziani solo site, featuring 235 mostly US models in professional glamour style photo sets and videos featuring posing, masturbation, toys and sybian action. I found little to complain about with the quality of the content or navigation features provided by the site. You can browse by model index, photos, videos and each section has a feature to sort the models, videos or photos either alphabetically, most recent date added or by rating. There is also an updates calendar which gives you the opportunity to see what updates are coming along in the future
I guess some people would argue the 1800px photos can’t compare to the super high res 4-5000px photos produced by similar sites but I never go for those anyway where there is an option in the 1600 to 2000 range so for me they are just perfect and here those photos are crisp and colourful and well lit with the models having professionally done hair and make up and a good variety of indoor and outdoor locations. The thing I found most annoying was that most models have at least 1 photo set wearing the Aziani branded clothing which to me became rather repetitive. It feels like I am constantly having the site advertised to me on the models clothing, I don’t need to see advertising for this site as I’m already a member and just incase I should happen to forget where I am there’s 2 great big watermarks on every damn photo to remind me!
My preferred model type is the 18 to 25 year old natural body type so I was on short rations here. Those who prefer the big boob fake tits American pornstar look will probably enjoy this site more than me but I did manage to find enough models to make the 20 bucks worthwhile. Some of my favourites here would include Capri Anderson, Carli Banks, Celeste Star, Georgia Jones, Jana Jordan and Shay Laren.
As for the videos they come in a choice MP4 1280 x 720, WMV 960 x 540 or Mobile download options along with Flash streaming. Looking back through the archive the 1280 x 720 option tends not to be available for those videos released prior to late 2009 and as with any site which has been around as long as this the quality drops off the further you go back.
Overall there’s a huge amount of content to check out when taking into consideration the bonus sites which has recently been increased to 12 with a new site design giving you a network hub where all updates from the network can be seen in one place.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
06-09-1108:06pm (Update History) Reason: The longer I am in this site the more I notice its flaws. See update below:
Pros:
Surprising amount of pictures and videos for a Solo Model Site
I counted approx. 150 picture sets (1024 px), 110+ movies (720x576), anywhere between 20 and forty minutes long judging by the samples I downloaded. There are over 100 shorter clips for download as well.
Vidcaps
Short sex stories containing pictures of model.
Model is a happy amateur exhibitionist (the site is run by her and her husband) and it shows.
Mostly softcore. Hardcore content is mainly role playing between husband and wife.
No streaming, but because the videos are also offered in very short 1 minute clips with pictures for those with slower speed one can get a good idea what the video contains. Still I miss being able to preview a video.
Large and very obvious watermarks.
Pictures are not offered in zipped form.
No search engine.
Bottom Line:
The site is run by a Lady called Daniella English and her husband and it should be everything I hate: no zips for the pictures, large water marks, no streaming, no HD videos.
If I saw this mentioned in anyone else's review I would say, no thanks, yet there is something very appealing to this site and I confess that, despite the above mentioned shortcomings, I like it. Probably because it is not run by professionals which is a welcome switch.
Daniella has an incredible posterior - and be warned that in most videos and picture sets the emphasis is on showing off this large booty. She also has lovely big natural breasts and nipples and you truly get the feeling that she really enjoys showing off both. Those who expect a glamor model will not like this site but those who enjoy an ordinary housewife doing "rude" things for our sexual gratification will be glad they joined.
Because of the above mentioned cons I could not in clear conscience give the site a higher score but I like it nevertheless.
Update 09/06/2011: I was willing to overlook quite a few of the flaws of this site because I was so thrilled to run into a real amateur for a change but the longer I am with it the more I discover its flaws.
Many videos are too formulaic concentrating mostly on the butt of the model while there are very few prolonged frontal shots, or even shots of the English Milf's face.
Updates may be regular but are turning out to be too infrequent for my taste. Some updates (today's) could hardly be called an update at all because it consists of a very inferior series of small vidcaps.
And so, regrettably there's less to this site than I first hoped for and I am reducing my original score accordingly.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
06-06-1102:57pm (Update History) Reason: Gave credit for a site that's on another network I'm currently on too, removed that part, sorry about the confusion if anyone saw it.
Pros:
- A re-review that sees a +15 points change from previous review. A big network that focuses mainly on big boobs, many that are implants, but not all and some fun niches have been added or have grown since I was last here.
- Going to be impossible for me to figure out where the 720p and 1080p videos started, but I do know as far back as September 2009, from browsing, so about two years of those HD and true HD videos. 5 points added to score for this since it was required to stay a member 6 months when I was last on it to get HD downloads.
- Newer HQ pictures, not screenshots, go up to 2500 high end, which are real studio shot photo sets with each movie. Screenshot packs are also available and both are zipped.
- Download speeds hit right at my maximum I can receive, though at times, I do notice a slight 15% dip in speed.
- Navigation is good enough for a network.
- Network updates on average twice per day, 14 since last Monday.
- Doing better with the ethnic models too!
Cons:
- The obvious big con here is the amount of implants. I did a estimation once before of 50% of models on here having implants. I am seeing newer more natural models like Abella Anderson, also seeing more Latina, bi-racial models. So this is still a con, since if someone doesn't like implants, tattoos, it's not the best site to jump right into, but there are some really nice, natural models starting to show up.
- I won't beat this to death, but they still have my favorite hardcore exhibitionist site, Asses In Public, but it hasn't been updated in nearly 3 years. I'm sure there is good reason for it.
- I think like with the other networks, if you get bored easily, join for a month, come back for a month 6 months later and so on. The niche/story heavy sites will get boring to most of us after a month or so.
Bottom Line:
I guess you could say Brazzers took a little blue pill on their score. Though I should mention on my original review of Brazzers, I gave them a 90, first re-review dropped to 77, now up to 92.
The previous time I joined Brazzers it was to download the Asses in Public content since the external hard drive I had it on had crashed and I loved the AIP content. Once done with downloading those again, I downloaded exactly one scene from the rest of the site in a month. After that frustration I then went through the 8 page cancellation process that annoyed the hell out of me. Good news on that too.
Now when you cancel, it makes you one offer, which is the same as the price you get going through TBP, if you pass the offer up, it confirms your screenname/password, you click ok and it's canceled and received a cancellation email within seconds. Much better.
I've been able to access the HD and true HD files since the start of my membership, so they've removed the 6 month recurring member rule to receive access to these. I do think these more honest, professional changes warrant 5 points added back to the score.
On the content, I really don't remember Brazzers having the Doctor Adventures site, but they may have and my past frustration led me not to look at them. More ethnic models have helped offset the blonde implant bimbo Barbie look I had complained about previously. I also think being away for two years has helped since I've forgotten most of the niches and can see that they are as original as any of the other networks out there.
Besides the improved video quality, there are the improved HQ photo sets with each scene that have some nice 2500 long end photos of the model by herself even if it is a hardcore scene. Everything works smoothly, clear links for zip downloads, click to download a video and all the options/formats show up.
In total you get 29 sites, including what looks to be a short trip to Budapest, for a site called ZZ Series, only has 16 scenes in it, but it has some of the top tier Euro models like Cindy Hope, another favorite Aleska (Diamond) and Blue Angel. Got some rougher niche/light dom sites like Hot and Mean, Pornstar Punishment, so there is a sign of Brazzers trying to develop some new niches for their network instead of how it used to be with nearly every site having "Big Tits in/at..." or "...Like it Big".
To me, it's a marked improvement all-around. The shady business practices are gone, the focus on nothing but boobs mentality is gone, asses in public content is still there if you don't have it and the addition of more brunettes, at least some less implants, added to the improvement in the video quality without the wait and improvement in pictures, it has earned that 15 point boost from the previous review and has made its way back into my network rotation. Definite recommend for anyone, especially boob lovers.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-23-1101:30am (Update History) Reason: Added another point for dropping the frame-based navigation, which was a bit awkward and glitchy. Revised navigation is much easier!
Pros:
- Great clothing and strips
- Wonderful lingerie
- Beautiful models with personality - good mix of shapes and types
- Good lighting and sets
- Outdoor shoots are fun and voyeuristic
- Great quality - most videos 1080, most pics up to 4000px
- Interview videos are fun and sexy
- Daily updates
- Consistent quality as the work of just one photographer
- Much sexier than most art-nude material
- Helpful and responsive webmaster/photographer
Cons:
- Navigation enhanced since I reviewed! Now more than enough options for the size of the site
- Would be nice if zips were named uniquely
- I'd be happy to see more late 20s models
- Would like more girls with at least strips/triangles of pubic hair (but there are some!)
- Studio/nude only shots are a little bland to me
- Some interviews in French are missing english subtitles (some have them)
- Update schedule is centred around specific models
Bottom Line:
I've been a collector of erotic photo books for a few years now; I like the tactileness of flicking through them, and there is some good material around that's more evocative than most porn (although porn does have it's own attractions, as I'm discovering online :) ). Such books come in two basic varieties:
- Those depicting the curves of the female form; or naked, shaved (and photoshopped) young girls cavorting on beaches
- Those that are actually arousing
From what I've seen of the well-known art photo sites - Hegre Art, Met Art etc - they fall more into the first camp and so, although featuring very beautiful girls and excellent photography, don't really work for me. This site - at least for me - is different and quite erotic, thanks to a number of things:
- Models - mostly natural girls, 19-28, most in early and mid 20s. Sophisticated French girls, glamorous eastern European models, and quirky girls with eg, tattoos, piercings, mops of curly or dyed hair. The photographer makes the most of them all; I've found sets to interest me for every model I've looked at so far.
- Clothing - the girls look great, comfortable and relaxed in what they are wearing (even if only briefly). And the lingerie... it's expensive, smart, sexy and different... in most cases the kind that girls themselves like and would buy, nothing gaudy or tacky.
- Lighting - the scenes are all well lit - but not harshly so; it looks natural, and the colours aren't oversaturated as we so often see.
- Premise - the shots are centred around various themes, eg: waking up, showering, trying on lingerie, getting dressed - a bit voyeuristic and quite sexy (somehow dressing more so than undressing). The settings are either modern, smart hotel rooms, actual apartments (more voyeurism!), and quite a few outdoor scenes - some quite risqué stuff in Paris.
About 50 or so models, each with, approx 8 photo sets (80 each?) and 6 videos of 5-10 minutes. The videos are worth mentioning - similar in tone to the shoots, and some fun truth-or-strip interviews; for once I don't mind a guy doing the interviewing, maybe his French accent gets the best out of the girls.
It's not all perfect; each model has a couple of fully nude and/or studio shoots - for me these fall into the arty category and don't work as well without the atmosphere of clothing/premise/location. These are spiced up a little, though, with some shibari (Japanese-style rope bondage) and liquid latex (!)
Content is quite soft, maybe too soft for some folk; you will see:
- Pussy close-ups, stroking with fingers, hands slipped into panties and tugged aside
You will not see much (although a little) of:
- Fingers/toys inserted, spread open shots
Also, some minor cons as above; and I find a few glitches - eg thumbnails linking to the wrong sets - but they've been corrected as I've mentioned them on the forum.
But these are minor gripes and not really important. Overall, a really great site that sets the bar for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-17-1111:07am (Update History) Reason: Since this is primarily a picture site the consistent blurriness (softness) of the HR pictures forces me to downgrade my original score.
Pros:
Beautiful models. Some of them very well known and sought after.
Good selection of picture sets and videos.
Pictures come in three different sizes with the biggest ones weighing in at 3000x2000. Typical set is rather small though.
Videos come in two sizes: a smaller one at 640x360p, but very crisp, and an HD one at 1280x720p.
Both sizes are very nice when it comes to clarity of the picture. Videos vary in length. Some can be as short as 3-5 minutes or as long as 11 minutes. There might be longer ones but I haven't come across them. On the other hand, if you have a solo model slowly divesting herself of her lingerie you don't really need a 30 minute video.
Pictures and Videos are downloadable with no restrictions!
Daily Updates alternating between picture and video.
Cons:
The naming is horrible. A combination of numbers and letters plus the size you downloaded, that's about it. (eg. 2180-zzD-Ultra.zip) It forces you to stop and rename each and every file when it has finished downloading so that you will remember the name of the model inside the zip.
I am a picture person at heart but was disappointed with the quality of the High Resolution pictures at 3000x2000. They almost reminded me of Twisty's or Only Tease. Too much body make-up, too much air brushing, too much photo shop? Picture became way too soft because of the way it was treated.
It's presented in a size where one should be able to count every pore and hair and fold of garment on a model but in my sample sets I couldn't.
Focus was in the wrong place at times as well. But I guess that's where the "art" comes in.
I had very slow speeds when using DTA and was surprised to find that I was doing better with my ordinary Firefox downloader .. but even then I barely managed more than 500-600KB/s
Bottom Line:
A very nice, user friendly site for lovers of erotic lingerie. It has the same basic lay-out as Only Tease and if you've ever been a member of that site you will know that it has to be excellent.
I liked the idea that in some sets and videos the model started out with more than just bra, panties, garter belt and stockings (sadly many of them ARE like that) but would have liked them to finish fully nude.
They don't hide anything, as opposed to OT, but be warned the site is very softcore! Don't expect spreading or masturbation or insertions, you won't find it here.
The models are very appealing to me despite their youth. I guess that touch of fine lingerie helps. Too bad about the pictures, though. I will restrict myself to downloading videos until someone decides to do away with all that powder and sharpens the pictures a bit.
It is my opinion that they built themselves a very nice site here with lots of content considering they are only a couple of years old and I would recommend it to lingerie lovers, if for nothing else than the HD videos that can be found right from their beginning in 2009. I would even recommend it to picture lovers if they don't mind that soft look!
If they renamed their zip files to something more practical like "Eufrat01HR.zip" for instance I would happily give them a higher rating because the models and lingerie are truly stunning, but the present way of naming files is annoying me no end.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-09-1103:23pm (Update History) Reason: Upped to original score because refund was promptly issued after a Billing France mistake.
Pros:
59 models by my count, (I might be off by a couple) who are generally quite appealing. Most have at least seven picture sets and 6 - 8 videos.
HD videos being offered at 720p and 1080p.
Picture sets being offered zipped at 1000, 2000 and 4000px.
Multiple downloads possible.
Detailed search, once you have figured it out, allowing you to search by every possible criterion, from body shape to setting of shoot and everything in between.
Original concepts in some shoots.
Regular daily updates alternating between picture sets and videos.
Cons:
I hate to say it but I found most of the sets very bland, and even those containing lingerie were far from what I expected from the camera of a lingerie fetishist.
Many of the shoots are ill-lit, greyish in tone or too soft. (See Anais update, January 11, this one was definitely not ready for prime time unless the photographer was being artistic.) The wrong color is often used in the studio shoots. One model who was shot in front of a blue background looks ghastly, like a drowning victim.
The same question might be asked when it comes to focus. Is the photographer doing it for artistic effect or is it a mistake that the head of the model is blurred while the genitals are in sharp focus, and vice versa. One sample set even contained a foot in focus while everything around it was blurred. Affectation or artistry?
Many of the 4000px photo shoots I downloaded lacked detail and looked more like enlargements than Ultra High Resolution.
Videos are only between 2 and five minutes long.
Bottom Line:
Okay, I could have kept on going about many of the videos being nothing but an actual photo shoot being filmed, or that most picture sets look more like screen caps when it comes to composition and positioning of the models, or that the navigation is highly confusing to the newbie, or that the file naming could be improved, but I think you get the point by now that I liked very little about this site.
I also believe it is in search of an identity:
There is artistic nude modeling, there are outdoors, exhibitionist shoots, there is lingerie etc.
I would say there are eight different categories in all, because most models have that many sets, all with a different motif from the others.
This would make it awfully hard for anyone, no matter what their taste, to like this site for very long because with only 50+ models one can download one's personal niche in a day or two.
Of course if you are less discriminating than I and like every setting, or if you tend to download models rather than themes, then you would be fine for the month.
I did like a lingerie set or two (talking about my own niche) but even there I was greatly disappointed. A flimsy wrap or nylons and garter belt in a handful of pictures does not an erotic set make.
Especially if so many pictures of the short sets (60 - 90 pics approx.) are out of focus in important places.
I did like the originality of having some models start out nude and then get dressed in their finery, rather than the other way around.
I also enjoyed the way their short interviews were conducted (4 - 5 minutes) by giving the model a handful of cards with questions on them and they could reply, or not, if they felt like it. No pressure put on, no offensive questions by the interviewer .. a nice change.
A change of a different kind: one model even confessed that she wasn't all that keen on sex. Her honesty is to be admired but doesn't exactly get the juices flowing.
Bottom Line:
I would say this is a softcore site for the artistically inclined, because all of that "softness" and out of focus material MUST have been shot that way intentionally (see the site's Forum for the exquisite equipment used by the photographer) and would appeal to a special, more refined taste than mine.
I really hate to say this (thinking of my good friend's review below) but I got more good material out of the sites I like to complain about than out of this one, and wish once again that I could give away a membership that others who like experimental photography might enjoy more than I do.
Added on the second last day of my subscription to this site (Feb. 20):
If you like crisp, clear, well-lit pictures with natural flesh colors do not waste your money on this site because you won't find them here.
The models are pretty but could look a lot prettier in someone else's hands. Subjective, I know, that's why I am really looking forward to some future review(s) to see how far off I was in my assessment.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
04-28-1103:10pm (Update History) Reason: The longer I am a member of this site the more I appreciate its qualities. Raising score by Two (2).
Pros:
A large selection of very beautiful models from Europe and North America.
Impressive photography, mostly solo or g/g. Available in approx. 930x1400 px, Normal Resolution and 2200x3500 px High Resolution, zipped. Slight changes in resolution from picture to picture. Enormously large sets giving you the choice of keeping only the very best.
Most recent videos are in HD format in 720p dvx and mp4 format, as well as the extra large videos at 1080p wmv. All are downloadable!
Streaming is also available for previews or watching the whole video on-line if you so desire. Streaming picture is HD and very clear as well. I experienced no buffering problems.
Speed of download was also very good for me at 3.5 MB/s. This was for a single file through Firefox's DTA. Normal downloads through the browser downloader were much slower but still around 600 KB/s but as a plus this way of doing things seemed to allow multiple downloads.
Nice bonus material (auditions, blogs, bts etc.)
Cons:
Huge picture sets will require a large amount of time to prune. I never thought I would consider a set containing approx. 300 pictures a con. Well, it isn't really - see above under pros, but some of you might be a bit more impatient when it comes to downloading or editing a 500 MB picture set so be warned.
I desperately want a search engine for this site. You practically have to go from update (arranged in chronological order) to update to find something that fits your taste.
Model directory is in alphabetical order but it would be nice if the pictures of the models contained the dates when her sets and videos were published. This would prevent the frustration of finding a beautiful model and then realize that her pictures are not High Resolution and her videos are split up into various parts .. something most of us aren't interested in nowadays unless we collect the complete works of a model.
Continued below:
Bottom Line:
It would be nice to be able to go to a point where publishing HD videos and HR pictures first started and work one's way up to the present from there.
Close attention is required when looking at the updates themselves, some are an invitation to rate sets, some are bonus material from other sites, some are masturbation videos or g/g videos, some are picture sets, but there are also videos of photoshoots .. something I dislike heartily, but others might enjoy.
Because I didn't pay attention originally I downloaded a hefty HD file (g/g content) expecting hot action and found myself listening to the distracting remarks of the director as he gave his instructions for the shoot. I don't like to have my illusions destroyed. But, as I said, some might like that sort of thing.
BOTTOM LINE:
This is a well-respected, well run site that offers top quality material. I did not see one single unattractive model, I'd even take the ones they had to reject during their auditions. Most would be between 18-25 in age.
The material is shot indoors, as well as in more exotic locations. Lovers of glamorous videos and picture sets will be well pleased.
There is also the added eroticism of a bit of kink. Fisting, insertion of large objects (mostly dildos), peeing, some public exposure scenes. Good stuff for most.
I also loved the fact that I did not come across one single pair of enhanced breasts. They MIGHT be there but I didn't come across them. This is so refreshing when compared to most sites!
I am adding my usual plaint, and yes, all of you who know me knew it would come:
I wish they featured some mature women, and I wish that their models would wear more than the bare necessities. Sometimes the girls don't even wear those, because I very seldom came across a bra or even a pair of panties during many of my spot checks of the picture sets and videos, but then I shouldn't go to a site like this one and expect it to be something it wasn't meant to be.
You can't expect to find cougars in a cubs' playpen.
After all this site is not meant for lovers of a leisurely strip by mature women but for those who revel in beautiful young, glistening bodies, and for them ALS SCAN does its job very well.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
RSS Feed
