Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ unique amateur MILF content
+ weekly updates
+ mostly good picture quality (even for the oldest sets)
+ no download limit, no DRM but clumsy navigation
+ fast server with very good download speed (about 2.5 MB/s)
Cons:
- older picture series may only contain about 50 pics and have 1024 pixels on the long side
- only a few sets together with other girls
- videos come as WMV only
- no ZIP files for the picture series
- poor navigation on the member pages
- Billing through CCBILL only but at least no regional pricing
Bottom Line:
DISCLAIMER
First of all I have to point out that I'm a fan of Michelle for several years now. Nonetheless I do hope to be professional enough to write an honest review about her second site.
ABOUT MICHELLE
Michelle is a 50 year old girl from the UK now living in Spain. She IMHO is a drop dead gorgeous lady with a very pretty face and a killer smile. Her firm 32FF boobs and round ass are so delicious I would never think that she's already that old not to forget her wonderful legs and smooth skin. If someone would ask me for a prototype of a genuine British or western European MILF I could only name her.
In the beginning she was always shaved but it seems to me that she now wears her pubic hair with pride. She wanted just to grow it and do a shaving special for one of her members but that was months ago.
Michelle loves her little hobby and as one can see it did her good the last 5 years as she now looks more sexy and absolutely self-confident. She simply enjoys to be watched and to tease.
ABOUT THE WEBSITE
Michelle started this site in October 2007 and until now she made more than 200 picture updates (with more than 130 matching videos) showing her in- and outdoors wearing elegant dresses and of course nylons and girdles. She loves short skirts, elegant heels, playful lingerie, nylons and girdles, oral sex, to masturbate using toys or her fingers alone, posing nude outdoors in the countryside and to tease. The updates are different to what can be seen on Southern Charms she may use the same dresses or lingerie but the content differs.
Only a few sets show her together with some other girls mostly her friend Julie who shares her interest in nylons and hot lingerie.
ABOUT THE PICTURES
The preview area gives you a very good idea of what can be found in the member's area. Starting end of 2010 (updates 189 dated 2010-12-18 to 211 dated 2011-05-02) the pictures now have 1280 pixels on the long side. The JPG quality is good enough to blow them up even on a very large screen.
But beware because some of the newer sets contain pictures that aren't sharp enough guess her husband had some trouble with his camera. The latest sets are crisp again. I use one of her landscape pictures as background for my PC and therefore blew it up to 2401x1600 pixels from the original 1277x851 size and the quality is still good.
ABOUT THE VIDEOS
Her videos are mostly 4:3 aspect ratio with 720x576 pixels resolution and come a bit grainy but still enjoyable. I have to sit about 2 metres away from my screen to be able to enjoy her teasing me. The videos show her doing solo teasing, masturbation with fingers and dildos, doing handjobs, blowjobs or having intercourse.
CONCLUSION
This website is recommended for MILF lovers that like to see a nylon lady sharing her passion for sex. The site has some points that would need some improvements but is worth a try.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-17-1111:07am (Update History) Reason: Since this is primarily a picture site the consistent blurriness (softness) of the HR pictures forces me to downgrade my original score.
Pros:
Beautiful models. Some of them very well known and sought after.
Good selection of picture sets and videos.
Pictures come in three different sizes with the biggest ones weighing in at 3000x2000. Typical set is rather small though.
Videos come in two sizes: a smaller one at 640x360p, but very crisp, and an HD one at 1280x720p.
Both sizes are very nice when it comes to clarity of the picture. Videos vary in length. Some can be as short as 3-5 minutes or as long as 11 minutes. There might be longer ones but I haven't come across them. On the other hand, if you have a solo model slowly divesting herself of her lingerie you don't really need a 30 minute video.
Pictures and Videos are downloadable with no restrictions!
Daily Updates alternating between picture and video.
Cons:
The naming is horrible. A combination of numbers and letters plus the size you downloaded, that's about it. (eg. 2180-zzD-Ultra.zip) It forces you to stop and rename each and every file when it has finished downloading so that you will remember the name of the model inside the zip.
I am a picture person at heart but was disappointed with the quality of the High Resolution pictures at 3000x2000. They almost reminded me of Twisty's or Only Tease. Too much body make-up, too much air brushing, too much photo shop? Picture became way too soft because of the way it was treated.
It's presented in a size where one should be able to count every pore and hair and fold of garment on a model but in my sample sets I couldn't.
Focus was in the wrong place at times as well. But I guess that's where the "art" comes in.
I had very slow speeds when using DTA and was surprised to find that I was doing better with my ordinary Firefox downloader .. but even then I barely managed more than 500-600KB/s
Bottom Line:
A very nice, user friendly site for lovers of erotic lingerie. It has the same basic lay-out as Only Tease and if you've ever been a member of that site you will know that it has to be excellent.
I liked the idea that in some sets and videos the model started out with more than just bra, panties, garter belt and stockings (sadly many of them ARE like that) but would have liked them to finish fully nude.
They don't hide anything, as opposed to OT, but be warned the site is very softcore! Don't expect spreading or masturbation or insertions, you won't find it here.
The models are very appealing to me despite their youth. I guess that touch of fine lingerie helps. Too bad about the pictures, though. I will restrict myself to downloading videos until someone decides to do away with all that powder and sharpens the pictures a bit.
It is my opinion that they built themselves a very nice site here with lots of content considering they are only a couple of years old and I would recommend it to lingerie lovers, if for nothing else than the HD videos that can be found right from their beginning in 2009. I would even recommend it to picture lovers if they don't mind that soft look!
If they renamed their zip files to something more practical like "Eufrat01HR.zip" for instance I would happily give them a higher rating because the models and lingerie are truly stunning, but the present way of naming files is annoying me no end.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+++ 10 years of content online
++ Decent sized pics (all with zip) at 1300x2000 for the newer stuff
++ Good quality 1280 x 720 video
+ Choice of stream, wmv and mp4 downloads on newer vids
+ Some older material has been remastered for better size and quality
+ Updates 2 - 3 times a week
+ Good mix of solo, lez and hardcore (each about 1/3 although about half the HC scenes are just footjobs)
+ 2 day full access trial for $7 through TBP
+ Allows for DL managers (12 channels - 6 channels if downloading manually)
+ Many pic sets are set up for 3-D viewing if you download an app and have the glasses (I didn't try it).
+ Overall good quality production and lighting
+ Exclusive DDF material (not a lot taken from other DDF sites either)
Cons:
-- Quality takes a dive once you get back to 08 and 07
-- Navigation and website need a big overhaul
-- The "casting" section of the site shows numerous updates but many sets have no material in them.
- Slow movie downloads (I rarely got above 200 kb/sec with a broadband connection)
- Many photo scenes seem incomplete (set abruptly ends when it looks like it should continue)
- Some recycled content from other DDF sites and earlier HL&F scenes
- No search function and no scene tags
- Only a few screen caps (get more)
- Newest vids only allow full scene downloads, no clips available
- Newer content doesn't have as many hot models, not as much true HC (as opposed to footjobs) and less costume/lingerie focus.
- No email confirming membership and they bill through vxsbill which is fine but canceling was easy and done through the website (I did get a cancel confirmation email).
Bottom Line:
When I first found this site about 7 years ago I loved it. Hot girls, good lingerie and costume setups, good photography with some unique angles and frequent updates. While I wanted to give HL&F a 90 or better I just can't do it because the DDF boys just aren't putting out what they're capable of. Here's the lowdown:
PICS: Sets have about 100 to 120 pics and all have zips though only in the largest size. Newest pics go up to 2000x1300 but drop off to 1600x1080 starting around '08 and the oldest are only 800x600. Zip labels are actually good here and don't need relabeling. As noted, a bunch of photosets feel like they've been randomly ended. Quality is very good but more pics would be appreciated. 3-D is option on many sets that I didn't try. Watermarks present but not too big.
VIDS: Flash stream available for about the last 5 years of material (usually at 960x540). Newest vids are 1280x720 but before 08 tend to only be 850x480 or 7620x400. MP4 and WMV options available for the last two years but '08 and earlier only WMV, DiVX and QT available. Smallish watermarks on all vids. Vid sizes seem somewhat random for their release dates between '05 and '08 (one update will be small while the prior one will be large). Download speeds were a bit slow too. I don't know why they do this but the recent vids don't allow for clip downloads, only full scenes. Quality, again, is very good.
OTHER: The website needs an overhaul. Very plain looking and getting around takes some clicking. No real preview available. There are only a few search categories that are useless. No search function or scene tags also hurt with this much content available. They need a calendar update page or they need to better sort their material to make it more user friendly. There are brief model bios but it's pretty sparse.
The site seems to have lost some mojo the last year or so. Less focus on lingerie and more on the feet is not a great improvement by my standards. A lot of the recent hardcore and lez scenes focus more on footjobs as opposed to leg and sex worship. The girls aren't as hot as they once were either. The photography also seems more vanilla as opposed to unique and interesting which may be because DDF farms out more of their shoots maybe (not sure on this).
If it were up to me, I'd update the site look, add a search function and scene tags, make the videos more uniform in size, while adding more screen caps and allowing for clip downloads, remaster their oldest content, make sure their "casting" updates actually have content in them, and bring back more of the lingerie/hosiery focus and limit the amount of pseudo domination and foot emphasis they've recently been doing.
I know DDF can do better than this and I hope they do because this is a great site rivaled only by footsiebabes. I'd like to come back in another year or two and see things improved. Right now they need to do a little work but it's still a pretty good site.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Quantity, quantity
A few downright amazing pix and really nice looking models.
Cons:
This has the look of a pantyhose fetish site set up by breast men. Leg festishists like a teasing process (see Onlyallsites.com), with a gradual removing of clothes. This site has the skirt off almost always by the third pic. There's precious little leg crossing,hemline hiking, shoe dangling or foot dipping--all prized by leg fetishists.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large collection of pictures and videos with beautiful women in nylons and high heels (few bare legs)
-Emphasis on legs/nylons/lingerie/high heels. Mainly solo girls.
-High quality videos.
-Models talk a lot during the videos.
-Beautiful lingerie, outfits and nylons on the models.
-The models keep their shoes on!
-Frequent updates (2 or video/picture updates per week)
-Fast downloads.
-Great selection of awesome shoes. Mainly platforms and high heels.
-Fairly priced.
-Easy site navigation and simple design.
-95% beautiful girls.
Cons:
-The older videos are fair quality, but like most sites, getting better all the time.
-The site limits the amount you can download in a day.
-Only two lesbian sets.
-No zip downloads.
Bottom Line:
-This is by far my favorite leg/nylon/high heel web site! I have belonged to Altaheels almost continuously since it started. It has practically every component of a leg site that I look for – Super pretty girls with long legs, terrific outfits, fantastic stockings and pantyhose, amazing high heels. For you guys out there who like bare legs, there is some of this here too. Some unique things on this site:
-A bunch of sets with seamless pantyhose! These are always the best!
- Several sets of “layered” stockings over pantyhose. These are tremendous to us leg guys.
-Tons of different high heels. They range from 6 inch pumps to 8 inch platforms.
-A couple of shoots with some crazy high heels (with like 6 inch platforms and 12 inch heels)!!! I have never seen these kinds of shoes on any other site!!!
-Girls who “talk” or tell a story during the videos! These are very unique among all leg sites. There is nothing more of a turn on then to hear a girl talking to you; trying to turn you on, with nylons and heels? The best! I hate leg videos that just show a girls sitting there like a lump. I want to get to know her a little or just see that she is a real person.
-The overall size of the site content is great.
-The pictures are better than average quality, 700x1000 pixels, about 225 kb. Most sets have 30 to 60 pictures. For me, more important that the size of the pictures is the content.
-The video quality of the older stuff is average, but the newer videos appear to be getting much better. Most of the videos last 5 to 11 minutes.
-The price is a good value because of the content and frequent updates (24.95 for 30 days then 21.95 reoccurring every 30 days). I do see that they do split some of the content to other sites, but this is the one I really like to see.
-For me, the key to this site is the complete overall substance. Sure, blahblahblahlegs.com has a few prettier girls but ALTAHEELS has every girl in super high heels; blahblahblahnylons.net may have higher video quality but half the girls aren’t wearing nylons or lingerie; blahblahblahstockings.ru has nice outfits but the in the videos the girls can’t speak English…. I guess my point is that the pieces of the puzzle that I am looking for come together here.
BTW – As I was writing this, I looked through my hard drive at some of the videos and there are a couple videos (sam_geo_001, heather202 and celeste_303) which alone would be reason enough to join! Absolutely mind-blowing for leg men!
-I give it a 96. I took some points off because of the download volume limiter and no zip files, but if you are a leg guy; you should definitely check it out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
12-06-1009:43am (Update History) Reason: Score adjusted upward because complaint about slow speeds appears to have been an abberation rather than the rule.
Pros:
Great looking British models.
Sexy vintage lingerie. Latest videos and picture sets are of good quality. Videos at present come in at 1280 x 720 px at 5000 kbps. Picture sets are of good quality as well and are available in zipped format.
Content not overwhelming but 470 Picture Sets and 244 Videos (many of the older ones are, of course, of lesser quality) isn't too bad either.
Love British accents.
Additional three bonus sites.
Cons:
Site does not allow you to stop and then resume a download.
Not download manager friendly. My trusty DownThemAll gave me the same speed as the regular browser downloader.
Awful, inadequate search engine. I saw one picture on the tour and it was this picture that enticed me to subscribe. Do you think I can find that set? Rhetorical question! I suppose I will before the month is up.
Only one update every five days.
The three bonus sites do not offer a great deal of content.
Access to bonus sites requires a separate sign-in.
Bottom Line:
Despite some of the negatives a nice site.
The few videos I downloaded yesterday were great. Lovely vintage lingerie (full size panties, nylons and garter belts, girdles, bras etc.) I am looking forward to downloading quite a bit more of their great videos (at least the newer ones) because just about every one of them looks tempting. The "dirty" talk by the models doesn't hurt either!
The three bonus sites "Pantyhosed4U" (305 photo sets, 138 videos), "VFAcademy" (69 photo sets, 70 videos), and "VintageFlash.Archives" (236 photo sets, 1 video!) are nice to have but aren't big enough, or update often enough, to make subscription to this site worthwhile for more than one month.
I like the mother site (reviewed), it does have its flaws but at least, for once, I don't have to condemn a site out of hand which is refreshing.
Recommended to fans of vintage lingerie and British models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-CCbill is their CC processor.
-They have a wide variety of sites that target specific fetishes like: anal, mature, shemales, feet, nylon & pantyhose, gays, lesbian and toys.
-They have a pretty impressive library of videos.
I stopped counting at 2000 videos because the content on the other sites did not appeal.
-Some sites offer both videos and photo sets.
-Many of the videos come in a single file but not all of them.(see Cons)
-You can download photosets as a single zip file.
-You can use a download manager(see Cons).
-They rebill at almost half the original cost.
-Some of the videos have little scenarios but it's all in Russian.
Cons:
-You have to log in to each site individualy from the main members site everytime you visit that main site. The only redeeming thing is that as long as you go back to the main ferro page and you've log on to a specific site once then you won't have to log in again.
-Once you've logged on to a site then there is no way of going back to the main ferro page except if you use the back button as many times as you did going forward or logging back on to the main screen.
-You can use a download manager but since you can only download about 4 videos at a time then why bother.(I didn't see a difference in speeds either way).
-There is no search option of any kind.
-The updates are not dated so no way of knowing if or when the sites update.
-There is only one video download option.
-Some videos are broken in 3 or more sections.
-The price is way too high for what this network offers.
Bottom Line:
-I've been curious about ferro since the moment I heard about the network. The cost always made it a near impossible option for me but since I recently won the top draw then I thought this would be the time.(No you can't use your winning for that but I could buy Christmas gifts with them and that left me some extra cash).
-This network might have been a great find about 8 to 10 yrs ago. All that porn under one roof and such an amazing selection to chose from but this is 2010 and a network that doesn't date their updates, offer better download options, lowering their exorbitant join cost should not exist.
Possibly the best thing about the join price is that it makes it very hard for most porn surfers to join and seeing the content makes me think that's not a bad idea. If they drop their price then more people will be tempted to join this site and franky that would be a bad idea for most customers.
I debated which score to give this network and I stuck with 62 only because there are still quite a few good videos. You'll just have to do some serious research to find.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Extremely large collection of pictures and videos. I mean, this site has been around forever.
- Caters to leg/nylon/high heel guys. Tons of content for leg-lovers.
-Frequent updates and new models (approximately 1-2 per week)
-High quality videos.
-The downloads come pretty fast (I don’t know much about internet server speed but I would say it is somewhere between amazon and computer support site in India)
-Nice outfits and nylons on the models.
-Good selection of shoes. Nice platforms and high heels.
-Discounts on DVD purchases from their online store.
-Steaming video and live shows (available at certain times)
-Fairly inexpensive (about $30 per month) for the amount of content.
-Navigation of the site is easy and straight forward. I like sites that allow you to go right back to the home or updates pages without having to go through 50 pages first.
-Wide variety of girls (Caucasian, Black, Asian, Hispanic…..Younger, little older…)
-Approximately one lesbian scene a month.
Cons:
-A lot of the early stuff is so so quality and content.
-No zip downloads
-50% of the girls are good looking, 10% are much less. (Remember – 40% are smoking hot)
-Way too many sets of JB himself in what he calls “POV shoots”. I am a leg man and I want to see hot girls in nylons! I just don’t want to see a guy’s junk being jacked off by an Asian chick every forth photo set.
-Many of the videos just have a girl sitting on a bed or pole dancing in pantyhose. No talking at all. I just think videos that have the girl talk to you, interact with you.
-Some of the photo sets could be larger. They range from 40 to 80 pictures in a set.
-The older videos are fair quality, but like most sites, getting better every day.
-No model or content search engine. I would love to be able to search for “seamless pantyhose” or “2 girls in pantyhose” on the site because of the large content.
-No rating system for pictures or videos.
Bottom Line:
-As any leg guy can tell you, JB Video is one of the oldest and often one of the first leg sites that most of us join (it was my first and I have re-joined dozens of times over the years). So in many ways I feel like I am reviewing the Eifel Tower. It is a great nylon/leg/high heel site with a monstrous collection of pictures and videos. Lots of hot girls in nylons and heels to please any leg guy. I would give it an 85 rating and say that if you love legs; you should join.
-A few suggestions:
-Too few sets with seamless pantyhose! As all us leg guys know; we search for seamless pantyhose sets like the Holy Grail.
-Too few sets of “layered” stockings over pantyhose. Again, super awesome but few and far between.
-One of the very few leg sites that have videos showing girls changing shoes. An excellent bonus!
-A couple of the DVDs for sale (like Sky and Summer’s Foot Tease, Foot Seduction 14 Goldie and Isabella and Foot Seduction 24 Emily and Darenzia and a couple of the other lesbian videos) are worth the price of admission alone. True masterpieces! There should be more lesbian sets like these! I love these videos because the girls are talking the whole time, talking about their legs and nylons.
-Pretty good shoe collection. Nice sets with 6 inch platforms. I would like to see a few sets with some 8 inch heels.
-Need to get rid of a lot of the “less pretty” girls.
-Way fewer of the “POV” sets of a guy getting a foot job from a girl. These aren’t very good and not very exciting.
I know a will be re-joining JB Video on a regular basis. A very solid leg site and a good value with a few kinks.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
10-19-1010:50am (Update History) Reason: This site is starting to seriously annoy me. Today's video update was at an unacceptable 640x480px at 1469 total bitrate. Lousy picture!
Pros:
At present 657 models, 913.663 images and 1854 videos according to their tour .. that's a lot.
Mostly beautiful girls. Sexy lingerie and hosiery.
Frequent updates.
Excellent picture quality offered in three different resolutions (largest 2000x3000px).
Zipped downloads.
Easy navigation and elaborate search engine.
Most recent videos are in 720p HD with a bitrate over 10000.
Cons:
The most disappointing con: I found a real sexy model with tons of picture sets and videos and her most recent video, published as recently as August 2010, is in 640x480 AVI format (approx 50MB) and of horrible quality.
In general the older videos, and you don't have to go back far, are just terrible. I have watched plenty of videos with the same technical specifications on other sites that were much better in clarity and quality.
Catering to a younger crowd only. There are tons of picture sets featuring thongs and stay ups but very few featuring full back panties or camisoles etc. There is not one mature face in the crowd.
Picture sets in general spend too much time on the fully clothed.
Bottom Line:
Quite frankly the eighty I gave this site is for the technical quality of its picture sets and for its elaborate search features.
The high resolution picture sets are great even though most did not appeal to me because they are too "young" for my taste when it comes to lingerie. See above.
I am managing to get my money's worth from the recent HD movies because, even though they might not exactly feature the lingerie I was craving to see, I love the girls and their British accents!
A good tease only site for softcore lovers, especially younger ones who grew up with thongs and stay-ups and pantyhose. For me it is a disappointment. Too bad I really had high hopes!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Gorgeus European women
-Amazing foot fetish action (solo, g/g and some b/g)
-Really huge archive, updated every day (one day with a picture set, next day with the corresponding videos)
-Several video download options
-zip archives for pictures sets
-Part of the ddfprod network
Cons:
-Best days of this site are long gone
-If bought indepentently it's quite pricy
-Some "new" sets are just re-editions of older ones
-Older sets have not been improved since they first appeared and have quite low quality
Bottom Line:
Hot Legs and Feet continues to be my favorite foot fetish site, although I think that it's "golden days" are now over. I remember when I first joined, Sophie Moone was in her full splendor and making tons of videos for DDF; the same could be said about Eve Angel, Anetta Keys, Sandra Shine... Now most of those models are retired, working for 21st Sextury or in the US, and the new models that have appeared since then don't have the same sex appeal or charisma. Or maybe it's just me...
In any case, this site works very well for someone who is looking for foot fetish action: it has quite a lot of solo sets; many girl/girl action sets, and quite a few boy/girl sets. It is updated very regularly (three new sets a week, consisting on pictures and video) and in its new sets it offers different download options and qualities. Only good things can be said about directing, lighting, editing, etc. None knows how to capture the beauty of female feet in action like these guys.
My last consideration is a quite obvious one: this site is included in the DDF Productions network deal, so if you are interested, I would recommend joining the whole network for a bit more money, because you will get access to other good sites too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
hot leggy models
intimate situations
models talk to camera
Cons:
Download limit disables your account. They should at least warn you that you are approaching limit.
Limited selection.
Model Tiffany removed and yet she is still shown on the front page (before joining)
Instead of consolidating sites to bring more content for less money, they decided to split off content to multiple sites.
No ZIP files for pics.
Bottom Line:
If you are into intimate videos of leggy women, then this site has some better models.
On the other hand, they are taking a rip off the customer approach with download limits that shutdown customer accounts, and splitting up the content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
# I have been a member for about ten times and still am excited enough about it; taken my breath away enough to do another review.
# Only Tease is one of the most erotic brands of softcore I have seen; a must see database for softcore and panty, hosiery, and foot and shoe fetish lovers.
#Prestige section which is premium quality glamour
#711 x 1066; 1365x2048; 2000x3000 photos
# enormous amount of photos over 850,000
#collection of models and overall photo quality
#price: only 24.95 a month
# offers fastrcks that members can use to see future updates Each membership starts with about 10 to see 10 future shoots or vids
# I look at all of the updates; just a solid amount of models-
Cons:
# the same set is usually the same for a lot of the photo shoots
# this is not a hardcore site. Its a niche site dedicated to softcore, hosiery, and foot fetish.
videos are outnumbered about 4 or 5 to one
Bottom Line:
The power of Only Tease- I've done so many reviews; even redoing and updating a review for the main site Only Tease; and I have spent a lot of time doing so.
I hope that softcore lover geared towards erotic softcore photos and videos won't miss out on such a fine database of gorgeous and mostly uk models. For only 24.95- its a great buy. I hope people won't miss out- but some will because they may think that softcore is too soft to be erotic but OT has proven to be the opposite of that Its taken my breath away just as much as some of my prior fav site reviews.
I have spent around 24.95 x 10 months for Only Tease member ships or about $250
without thinking much about it and probably will keep the 24.95 a month going though I should join the multi month or only all sites to save a little.
plenty of panty and bum closeups, uniform; tennis, ballerina, cheerleader; hosiery; premium prestige section shich is where they have the models pose in the nice sets. Vids are done both inside and outside and usually consist of the model primping and stripping their clothes off
but I would suggest Only Tease membership for any softcore lover- its really a reliable site in terms of overall quality and I have still yet to see all of the updates- more than I have time to look at.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- down and dirty masturbation
- vids are reasonable quality, lighting ok
- provides access to a range of other Ferro Cash sites
- navigation straightforward, easy to get to content
- seemed like it would get regular updates
Cons:
- selection was small: don't believe the tour come on
- bored looking models: clinical, disinterested
- repetitive scenes
- mostly East European girls, so not much in the way of understandable talk
- zero interaction with models
Bottom Line:
There's plenty of better sites giving you solo or girl-girl masturbation which are better value than this. Twistys or Suze would do.
On the plus side, you do get access to a big load of other content. However, that content is much the same.
It would be nice to have the girl come on to the camera. But, on sites like these I get the feeling that most of the "models" are street pros who are bored stiff. There's no need to speak English, but a bit of lust directed at the camera would help.
This was not money well spent and I will be steering clear of Ferro Cash sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- growing selection of photoshoots and videos
- daily updates
- very good search feature based on clothing type
- model index
- each set has a good selection; well composed and well lit
- generally pretty models, mostly smiling and seemingly enjoying the shoot
- videos also nicely lit
- zipped photoshoots
- most recent shoots have a selection of photo sizes; "ultra size" are 3000x2000, 250 dpi
- videos in several formats including HD
- nice selection of clothing, lingerie, stockings, pantyhose, shoes and boots
- reasonably active forum
- seems like there's feedback from the producers
Cons:
- some of the sets/videos are a bit repetitive
- some of the outfits are repeats
- not much more than topless
- videos are on the short side
- some of the videos lack direction - girls don't really know what to do
- could do with more videos
- not much interaction with models
- creeping cross sales
- irritating FastTrack feature
Bottom Line:
Only Silk and Satin delivers. You get a very good and expanding selection of pretty girls in a variety of sexy, silk and satin outfits.
Don't expect hardcore. This is strictly soft, not much more than the famous Page 3 range of UK tabloids newspapers. But, then, that's why you signed up, isn't it?
Well, that said, from comments I've seen and from my own taste, I would like to see a site that caters for clothing fetishes that provides some good masturbation scenes. Stripping from fully clothed is great, but I do want a little bit more. I guess Only is not going to give that.
As with other Only sites, there's a biased towards photoshoots. One or two videos a week and some of these look familiar to some of the photosets.
The Only brand has established itself well and is providing a regular stream of good quality product. It perhaps needs to take things to the next level. I've got a bit tired of the creeping repitition of sets and models. Perhaps Only can branch out into Only Boots or something like that. (Now that would really sell me!)
I really don't like the FastTrack feature which allows previews of content for a month at a time. Don't think this adds to the site and detracts from what is otherwise a good value site.
Overall? I've had a couple of bites of Only sites. I might come back again later. Only Boots would be a great sell. I guess we're going to have to wait for another provider to give that extra bit.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- tasteful stuff, videos and pictures
- good amount of stuff
- the "right" kinky viewing angles for nerds in pictures and videos
- mostly european-style, well-proportioned models
- site seems to update regularly
Cons:
- videos not in HD, video-quality varies according to release date
- picture resolution varies, not state of the art of today
- picture-sets not as zip-files
- explicit download-limit of 3 GB per day
- defacto download-limit is clearly much less and lesser, you download 10 or 12 videos and your account gets disabled, account then has to get reanimated by sending email to webmaster, this game repeats every day
Bottom Line:
Site has some good approach but needs to strain according to content quality and customer friendlyness.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Exclusive content
Very attractive girls
Large archive
Frequent updates
Good communication
Cons:
Some older content is non-nude
Videos need some work
Updates sometimes late
Bottom Line:
Nylon Stockings online is run by Lynne, a blonde MILF who has featured on several mature websites.
As far as content goes, it's pretty much a case of what it says on the tin. Most of the content consists of picture sets of women undressing from fully clothed to just nylons and suspenders. Sometimes these are removed also, but others, the suspenders are unfastened to allow the nylons to fall naturally down around the model's ankles (am I the only guy in the universe that finds that a massive turn-on?!?).
The explicitness of nudity varies between sets. A lot of the admittedly huge archive before 2009 consists of non-nude content, with slightly stronger stuff coming at the beginning of last year. In terms of explicitness, I would put the site somewhere around the Fets.com range.
Videos appear on the site only very occasionally and the quality isn't very good at all for this day and age.
Very occasionally (and this happened when I was a member back last year) the two-weekly updates seem to dry up for no reason. For example I am typing this at 2330 local time and today's update has yet to appear. That said the communication from the website owner has in the past been very prompt in responding to queries. The same could be said for the member guest book on the site.
Bottom line? I really like this site; there are some fantastic looking models who really look like they're into it, and I feel the glitches are very minor. If you're a leg man like me I urge you to take a look!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Nice discount through TBP.
-Huge network of sites with a similar theme.
-No download restrictions. A nice plus considering the sheer quantity that is available.
-Nice photosets with three choices of photo quality, including ultra large.
-Some HD quality videos, but not enough.
-Mostly very attractive models. However, about one third were not. Seem to be classy women that you might see or even know. I didn't see a single boob job.
-Very active member forum that takes requests from members.
Cons:
-Glamour type photography. Often the women have too much makeup and seem very stiff. They don't often seem into what they are doing.
-Most videos are not at all erotic. Not much in the way of sensuous movements. Rubbing an arm or a leg is not teasing.
-Many videos and photo sets don't even get to topless.
Bottom Line:
The site sells itself as 100% erotic, 100% tease and 100% exclusive. They also say they are about the erotic, not the extreme. In order to be erotic without being explicit, they need to appeal to the members ability to be mentally stimulated. Without explicit photos and videos, the models themselves have to be special in a way that other sites don't often attempt.
Since this is so unusual in pornland, comparisons are difficult, if not impossible. The question to be answered is, do they succeed? Is their goal of being erotic successful?
I was a member of onlytease.com in 2006. I was somewhat disappointed by the lack of heat I saw. However times change and so have my tastes in porn. Since I love nice legs and pantyhose, I felt that maybe I should give the network a try at the newly discounted price.
I found quite quickly that the network is a LOT larger than what I had subscribed to in 2006. The quality of both the videos and the photos has greatly improved. Navigation is easy, but the search function is still inadequate.
Did they reach their goal of being erotic? Yes and no. Yes some of what you see is truly great and I love it a lot. However, the site promises a lot more than it delivers. I thought the tease referred only to the content, but the site itself could be a lot better.
Regarding the outfits, the models all too often wear pants or use opaque pantyhose. I like dresses showcasing great legs that look like legs, in other words sheer pantyhose. I don't much care for cheerleaders or bunnies either.
Overall, problem number one is that nearly all the videos simply do nothing for me. In all fairness photo sites usually have poor videos. What I feel the problem here is that the models don't have much of a feel for teasing. For the most part, European models get into this type of photo and video modeling without first doing any stripping or other live shows. They may be quite beautiful, but don't master the art of sensuous movements. For example, I see a lot of scenes with hands rubbing arms or legs, but very little in the way of quick flashes. I rarely see a glimpse of panties that seems to be an accident or are intended to build up my interest. The strip sequences are usually quite dull and often end without being even topless. A lot of sizzle, but very little steak. There is an active thread in the forum about whether models who will not even do topless should be on the site.
In my opinion,the site is very much hit and miss. You would have to go through a lot of photo sets and videos to find the true gems. If you have the time and energy, you may fall in love with the site. As for me, I am happy to find a few truly enjoyable downloads, but the site is just too much work.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 24 videos, the most recent of which go all the way up to an impressive resolution of 1920x1080, and down to 320x 240 if you want the video fast. And the videos DO download fast. this network has one of the fastest download speeds I have seen.
- 32 photo sets at 1440px × 810px with zipped archives available. Each set has around 200+ photos and they look very good.
- the girls are very varied and you can see them in several scenes around the network. We have girls from the barely legal category all the way to borderline MILF. Which is really nice.
- each scene is focused on the girls legs and the panties they are wearing. There is an impressive variation in the girls outfits and stockings are ripped open quite often AKA the sex is pretty energetic, but much tamer than the Facial Abuse stuff.
- the girls often play with themselves before the sex scene, there is oral sex, I believe some anal and some groupsex as well, so that's nice and varied.
Cons:
- a network wide search would have been nice. I really like Amai Liu and I would have liked to find all her scenes at once. Also a category search for videos would be nice. Something to allow me to select anal scenes without having to browse the thumbnails...
- you can see the difference between the older sets both in quality of video as well as how beautiful the girls are. The site is definitely improving, but I only enjoyed the more recent stuff, to be honest...
- sometimes the preview thumbnail was not the bets shot out of the scene. I'd like it if there was a way to maybe make the previews interactive (roll mouse over) or if there was a model page or something similar...A lot of hot girls didn't stand out like this...
Bottom Line:
As part of the network and with the discount from PU this site will be interesting for any leg lover. However the fact that there are only 24 videos doesn't make it a must. It's more of a nice bonus if you joined the network for another, bigger site.
However, many scenes are well done and the variation makes it interesting. After a few more updates this site will be a really great place for anyone who wants to see girls having sex in pantyhose. If you're looking for more softcore stuff, this isn't really the place for you. The girls won't strip for half the video and turn around showing off their but through pantyhose. Sex and cumming on stockings is the big draw. Also there aren't any footjobs, really, which in my book is a big bonus, but some people might dislike it.
Finally, I'd like to say that I noticed a tendency of having more Asian models among the recent updates. Which is also a good thing in my opinion, but maybe others will disagree. Up to personal preference I guess.
Bottom line: not a deal maker here but definitely a nice bonus to an overall decent network for those who prefer hardcore porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
# one of my top five softcore sites that I've been a member of this year for overall selection of models and outfits; shoot quality
# forums; fastracks
# $19.95 per month; $10 off 90 day nonrecurring- 49.95
# about 50,000 pics; 140 videos
# outfits selection very good
#specializes on silk and satin dresses; panties and lingerie.
#vids come in HD; hirez AVi/ or lo rez flash
#one update per day.
#sets average 120-130 pics; vids average 5 minutes
# very good selection of models leaning towards full figured; big busts with curves
# offers tight fetish, shoe fetish, feet fetish;
# very provocatively shot sets; lots of close-ups of bums and feet, legs, breasts
#shoe lovers site
#very good resolution pics: 711x 1066; 1365 x 2048; 2000x3000;
Cons:
# site is a little new- started Nov 2008
# about 9 videos per month
# no full nudity- though models do go topless; with a few going bottomless.
# most models are not exclusive.
#silk and satin theme is limiting
# sets are often shot in the same setting
# I wish some of the models had more sets.
Bottom Line:
I have been quite taken by OSS and all the OT sites.
I went from trying OT out for a month a year ago because I liked softcore. Going into it, I didn't think I'd be back. I was blown away by their set- beautiful models. The poses were awful hot for a softcore site.
Now I am an only all sites member. This time reviewing Only Silk and Satin. OSS is a sister site of OT coming in the package. Though if joined seperate- $20. I have access to OSS because I paid 44.95 for all the sites- and it delivers I love it.
OSS has my respect- its my third review for the only all site. Its still a good deal for $20; though it is the smallest of the sister sites.
I love the outfits
Its for those who like softcore- may have panty hose; shoe or foot fetish.and close ups of bums busts, and beautiful feet in cute pumps and stockings.
and for those who like teasing in videos.
of course Only Silk and Satin focuses on silk and satin lingerie; and outfits.
Honestly, I think its better to join all the sites and be a member through the package deal- because OSS is still a small site.
I give this site just a 91 for its small size. But they are only asking $20 for it so not much should be taken off for that.
OSS has a great model collection; sexy outfit selection. The sets are shot in the same room but thats not important to me.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The dude below me gave the stats so I will concentrate on content, service and overall 'delivery of goods'.
Excellent quality and fast download speeds(4MBit) 1280x720
Multi formats
Decent sets
Nut burstingly horny babes
Good support (now)
Good camera work
Classy and pro presentation
Exclusive content
'Casting' shorts are a great addition
Stockings (about fukin time)
Cons:
REGIONAL damn pricing
Not enough updates
Some 'movement' of content from other DDF sites and some recycled older low res quality, although both are not repeated content
Not enough ethnic babes
Too many solos and same 'format' dudes
Not enough location shoots although the shoots are classy
Older films are low res and many models not repeated again
Bottom Line:
If you're into legs n shit, like I am, then this site is the leader in it's genre/field.
Stunning babes wearing hot gear in cool locations and emphasis being on feet and legs they do not disappoint.
The exclusive content is one of it's attractions. You will get the odd 'known' babe but the scenes are still exclusive.
I could do with more variety in terms of ethnic babes, guys who don't 'machine-gun' rump the babes as sometimes it's nice to 'see' the sex, maybe some better location shoots and re-introduction of babes from their back catalogue would be a winner.
The regional pricing stinks and I for one am really fukin sick of this shit. You can't call a 'small person' a midget any more unless you want your nuts torched and your house sold in compensation, but you can charge what the fuk you like when it comes to us in the UK.
I love this site but due to their slow updates and regional pricing it's not one I would stay a member of on a monthly and regular basis.
I also believe, much like other 'umbrella' sites, that there should be a discounted membership for those who want to sign up to all the DDF sites. It makes sense and keeps the variety and update aspect manageable.
Had it not been for the updates and regional pricing practices I would have thrown a few more points on the overall score. And until sites realise that we ARE their income streams and they stop treating us as if they are doing us favours then maybe the scores would grow and sites would establish a long and loyal paying customer base.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Many, many beautiful women
+No toys and almost no “messy” stuff with food or bath goop
+Intuitive interface
+Fast downloads, sometimes over 2Mbps
+Can preview the content of upcoming 3-4 updates on each site
+Earned or purchased ” FastTracks” allow full access to galleries or videos of your choosing ahead of their posting schedule
+VOLUMES of all-exclusive content available now, plus several hundreds of updates yet to be posted (Coming soon --> select “View all sets available for FastTrack”)
+Very user-friendly site/network. You get 10 free “FastTracks” in a calendar month (whole network, not per site); set several viewing and browsing preferences; and go from one site in the network to another with ease once your use/passes are stored in your browser.
+Photos from the past couple of years come in three sizes: 1066, 2048, and 3000 pixels.
+Consistently good lighting and clarity in photos from Jan. 2007 on.
+No DRM
+Model pages list other sites, outside the network, she appears in
Cons:
-Occasional slow navigation and sudden timeouts
-Thumbs with dead links (rare)
-Must train browser to auto-enter use/pass for downloads on subsequent logins (separate for pics and videos); doable with Firefox, but it’s still 18 times for everything in the network: (access + zips + vids) x 6
-Zips before Dec. 2007 require drilling through five levels of folders to get to the images folder (hold cntrl down while drilling to prevent desktop clutter).
-Some unattractive women
-Quite a few women never get fully undressed, like Gemma Massey (too bad!)
-High monthly network access price ($44.95)
-The “fast track” system is rather complicated; note expiry dates and other restrictions
-Boring videos: Only avi, 640x480, 3-6 minutes long. 40-50 per month (whole network) in 2009. (Image quality improves through the years, but it’s never nearly as good as the photos. Sound might be techno muzik, the girl talking, or just the air near the mic.)
Bottom Line:
I thought this network would be nothing but undressing to panties, if that, so I stayed away. But one day at OnlyTease, I tried their search (for visitors) and found nearly 2000 items that were at the “figure” level of nudity.
Now I’m glad that I waited -- and that I finally joined. Mind you, it’s usually the same women who do get fully naked and fun with it: Angel Dark, Elen (the blond Russian with the devilish smirk), Eve Angel, Jana D (Jamie J), Lola, Lucy Stratilova, Misa/Michaela Kaplanova, Mili Jay, Zuzana (Deny Moore), ETC. Considering the volume here, it’s been a bona fide candy store for yours truly (or “drooly,” I suppose).
Special mention goes to “Tammy” (aka Vendula). She’s the BEST.
The “Only” sites are photo sites, and the photos are DAMN good. If most models on this network showed off their asses the way Misa does, I’d be totally hooked! It would have EVERYTHING: great outfits, great stripping, and satisfying full nudity in excellent quality.
But they’d rather specialize at putting foreplay at the forefront, and this they do very well. I found myself grabbing “stripping only” sets of a few girls for whom I have “nude onlys” to combine them with. Kind of like “FemJoy and OnlyTease – together at last!” ;)
Here are some stats on the “Only” network sites: OnlyTease: started July 2002. Around Nov. 2007, began occasional 3000 px photos, which became standard in March 2008. 3 updates per day! OnlyOpaques (dark hose): started Aug. 2006; 3000 px photos most of the time from July 2007; 1 update per day OnlySecretaries: started October 2007, with 3000 px photos from the start; 1 update per day OnlySilkAndSatin: started Nov. 2008, with 3000 px photos from the start; 1 update per day OnlyCarla: started Sept. 2005, stopped in April 2009 (lots of photosets, all it of tease-stripping) OnlyMelanie: started April 2005, stopped in Feb. 2009 (same as with Carla, but REALLY cute!)
Finally, a little more about those FastTracks. One can be obtained by recommending three sites (not previously listed) that a model is on. (Must be used by the end of the current month.)
NB: You can view the thumbs of a set before deciding to FastTrack it.
I got a few that way, thanks to my application of library and information science, Lucy Lee, Tereza Ilova, etc. in the subject index.
But remember, it’s best not to join at the beginning of a month since you get 10 for free each calendar month. That’s a nice touch!
BUT be sure to download your FastTracked stuff right away, because access to it expires at the end of the month!
You can also buy 10 “Permanent FastTracks” for $9.95. These don’t expire as long as you stay a member, but they can only be used on the site you buy them on.
AND redeeming them on the site is a hassle: find the page before the billing page, click to redeem, get authorization code ... sheesh!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Entirely exclusive british softcore "porn" - but with masturbation.
A pretty rare mix of wellknown uk-models and totally amateurs.
Dirty talk in most videos - with british accents, of course.
Ok amount of videos - right now it's: 379
The newer videos and photosets are what most PUs will consider: Fine/ok - even crisp
For Michelle Thorne-fans this is just a great site - she has a LOT of videos and photosets.
One fine bonus-site: Pantyhosed4u.com
One other bonus site - not worth anything.
Old time lingerie - if you like that.
Cons:
The navigation here is almost a bummer - even if there is a search-machine and a model base.
But no way to search for "only videos" or "only photosets.
Price a bit high.
Updates come only once a week - BUT it now includes both videos and photosets.
Too many of the better looking girls have only photosets.
Very broad variation i model-quality/goodlooking - too many on the ordinary site.
A bit slow download.
Only solo stuff (apart from ONE video with bj) - well, only found one after browsing for weeks.
Bottom Line:
Joined the site because I found some stuff from it with Michelle Thorn and Linda Leigh - great britts - and both damn sexy.
The style here is - like the name indicates: Vintage.
That means that the models are all in lingerie from the 50's, 60's and 70's - and some is really outstanding.
The videos are now up to almost 380 - BUT it's only half of that amout that count to something - in viewing quality.
The newer videos are: 1024x760 - older ones goes down to: 640x480 and even 320x240.
All in WMV only.
The photosets are the same. New ones: 1600x1071 - older ones: not worth it.
But the main deal - apart from the outfit (lingerie) is the style in the videos. They are just dirty - for the solo kinds.
Most models does a fine dirty-talk - in a natural way - and in a way I ALMOST never see in US- solovideos.
If it was not for this dirty-talk, my score here would be quite a bit lower.
But listening to Michelle Thorne or even one video with Lucy Zara telling how horny she is and want to get fucked is worth it all.
Alas there are a little too many of the models that looks quite ordinary (not GOOD looking) - BUT still: even some of these girls end up being very sexy in their performance.
And the fact that they only have photosets of Linda leigh and Misty McCain is a bummer - so even if I'm probably not comming back - I can recommend a months membership - AND it looks like the site is growing - and new models are comming in, so who knows - maybe I'll try it again in six months or a year or so...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
# Only Opaques is hot: a sister site of OT; now they have my money also going to them.
# photosets and models are hot; and have me looking at their sets two hours at a time.
#beautiful models that are on the full figured side and less on the skinny side
#top three softcore picture site that I've been a member of this year- I love these photosets
#not too softcore; Only Tease sister site; i joined this site because i was so taken by Only Tease.
# foot fetish, stocking fetish; boot fetish; foot worship
# updates one photoset a day
# some recent select videos are shot in HD quality
#you can earn fast tracks easily; and see future updates in advance- have not seen this anywhere else
# $19.95 for 30 days- very nice deal for softcore
#Hi rez photos are hi quality in all sizes: 711 x 1066, 1365 x 2048; 2000 x 3000
# forums to give opinions; interact with models
# one of the best collection of models I've seen- top five sites for overall quality of models- they are beautiful
Cons:
# get about 8-9 videos per month; secondary to photosets
# Hd quality is not the super HD variety; and is only applied to select shoots.
# site is not huge- been shooting since August 2006
# this site is not for those who only want to see models naked though there are a few exceptions but for the most part- no.
Bottom Line:
Only Opaques is a great site for softcore lovers who lean towards pictures; and who love full figured models in tights; and in both silky and cotton panties. I also like to see beautiful women in pretty dresses; cute pumps; and cute outfits and you get a lot of that as well as well as close ups of boots; shoes; lovely busts toes and feet.
I found out about Only Opaques because I was a member of Only Tease first- and this is one of their sister sites. For one, the selection of models is great- I dont pass over models like I do other sites. I love their clothes; pretty dresses, the way they pose. Its a site for those who enjoy the way a womans body looks like in clothes; lingerie; garter belts; socks.
I'd recommend this site as a starter site for the whole series of OT sites- for under $20.
If you have read my past reviews- you'd see that i have seen a lot of hardcore; Yes, the softcore that Only Opaques offer is hot enough. and enjoyed this as much as hardcore.
Its the same shoot style as OT. But specializes in hosiery. Lots of super close ups of rear ends; big lovely bras; toes encased in silky hosiery; lovely garter belts and tights in your face; snug panties over volutuous bums; boots in your face; lovely tight skirts over vloutuous bums; nice portrait shots; tight opaque tights stretched over silk and cotton panties; some topless shoots; open leg shots in hosiery; bent over- round rear end in face shots and beautiful models.
I respect Only Opaques. The beauty of their models took my breath away and now have taken my money!!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots and lots of great looking girls, simply spoilt for choice.
Mega sexy outfits, these girls are very well dressed.
Shed loads of content, thousands of photosets and in choice of sizes too.
Good value for money (for a month, maybe not on an ongoing basis).
Easy to navigate and find what you want.
Cons:
Many of the videos are a bit naff.
The photos although good big size, can be blurry a lot of the time.
For a British site there seem to be too many non-british girls here.
Bottom Line:
Wasn't sure if this site was going to do it for me what with it being very soft core, but I was very pleasantly surprised. I do like my British girl sites and this one is up there as the best of them when it comes to the quality of the girls, there is babe after babe after babe, there really is a glut of great looking girls here and more often than not they are well presented in sexy feminine outfits. My only complaint with the girls is that there seems to be rather a lot of non-british girls which isn't necessarily a problem but when you consider this is supposed to be a british girl site you do feel just slightly cheated, they are however gorgeous so maybe I'm just being picky.
The photosets are great with a choice of sizes and very big pictures, but there's a lot of blurry pictures and not sure why this is, is it the compression or the standard of photography I'm not expert enough to know. The sets can be very repetitive and boring when they needn't be, it's like you get photosets with well over 100 photos and so many shots for a set where the girl is only getting topless or mild nude means a lot of very samey shots, it's almost as if they they are doing all they can to go for quantity over quality at times, several shots of the same pose for every pose just to bump up the figures and boast how many images the site offers.
One thing that gets right up my nose, is the fact they deceive and rate a set as nude when infact the model doesn't get nude, maybe that's intentional as part of the whole 'tease' thing but I'm not convinced, if they don't get nude then don't call it nude as it's misleading.
The videos are ok, but for a site of this size and standing I must admit to expecting better. I surprisingly prefer getting off to these great looking sexily dressed girls teasing and stripping slowly more so than the usual rude straight to it porn, but the general picture quality is lacking somewhat for a site as big as this.
Anyway am running out of characters so better sum up and say that this site is one of the best I've seen despite it's few negative points, it is well well worth a months subscription to as you get lots for your money and the girls are awesome, but although there appears to be plentiful updates I'm not sure they would justify a permanent recurring sub (that's not me anyway unless I win the lotto). You won't regret joining this site, so if you haven't already then go do it.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
