Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Many, many beautiful women
+No toys and almost no “messy” stuff with food or bath goop
+Intuitive interface
+Fast downloads, sometimes over 2Mbps
+Can preview the content of upcoming 3-4 updates on each site
+Earned or purchased ” FastTracks” allow full access to galleries or videos of your choosing ahead of their posting schedule
+VOLUMES of all-exclusive content available now, plus several hundreds of updates yet to be posted (Coming soon --> select “View all sets available for FastTrack”)
+Very user-friendly site/network. You get 10 free “FastTracks” in a calendar month (whole network, not per site); set several viewing and browsing preferences; and go from one site in the network to another with ease once your use/passes are stored in your browser.
+Photos from the past couple of years come in three sizes: 1066, 2048, and 3000 pixels.
+Consistently good lighting and clarity in photos from Jan. 2007 on.
+No DRM
+Model pages list other sites, outside the network, she appears in
Cons:
-Occasional slow navigation and sudden timeouts
-Thumbs with dead links (rare)
-Must train browser to auto-enter use/pass for downloads on subsequent logins (separate for pics and videos); doable with Firefox, but it’s still 18 times for everything in the network: (access + zips + vids) x 6
-Zips before Dec. 2007 require drilling through five levels of folders to get to the images folder (hold cntrl down while drilling to prevent desktop clutter).
-Some unattractive women
-Quite a few women never get fully undressed, like Gemma Massey (too bad!)
-High monthly network access price ($44.95)
-The “fast track” system is rather complicated; note expiry dates and other restrictions
-Boring videos: Only avi, 640x480, 3-6 minutes long. 40-50 per month (whole network) in 2009. (Image quality improves through the years, but it’s never nearly as good as the photos. Sound might be techno muzik, the girl talking, or just the air near the mic.)
Bottom Line:
I thought this network would be nothing but undressing to panties, if that, so I stayed away. But one day at OnlyTease, I tried their search (for visitors) and found nearly 2000 items that were at the “figure” level of nudity.
Now I’m glad that I waited -- and that I finally joined. Mind you, it’s usually the same women who do get fully naked and fun with it: Angel Dark, Elen (the blond Russian with the devilish smirk), Eve Angel, Jana D (Jamie J), Lola, Lucy Stratilova, Misa/Michaela Kaplanova, Mili Jay, Zuzana (Deny Moore), ETC. Considering the volume here, it’s been a bona fide candy store for yours truly (or “drooly,” I suppose).
Special mention goes to “Tammy” (aka Vendula). She’s the BEST.
The “Only” sites are photo sites, and the photos are DAMN good. If most models on this network showed off their asses the way Misa does, I’d be totally hooked! It would have EVERYTHING: great outfits, great stripping, and satisfying full nudity in excellent quality.
But they’d rather specialize at putting foreplay at the forefront, and this they do very well. I found myself grabbing “stripping only” sets of a few girls for whom I have “nude onlys” to combine them with. Kind of like “FemJoy and OnlyTease – together at last!” ;)
Here are some stats on the “Only” network sites: OnlyTease: started July 2002. Around Nov. 2007, began occasional 3000 px photos, which became standard in March 2008. 3 updates per day! OnlyOpaques (dark hose): started Aug. 2006; 3000 px photos most of the time from July 2007; 1 update per day OnlySecretaries: started October 2007, with 3000 px photos from the start; 1 update per day OnlySilkAndSatin: started Nov. 2008, with 3000 px photos from the start; 1 update per day OnlyCarla: started Sept. 2005, stopped in April 2009 (lots of photosets, all it of tease-stripping) OnlyMelanie: started April 2005, stopped in Feb. 2009 (same as with Carla, but REALLY cute!)
Finally, a little more about those FastTracks. One can be obtained by recommending three sites (not previously listed) that a model is on. (Must be used by the end of the current month.)
NB: You can view the thumbs of a set before deciding to FastTrack it.
I got a few that way, thanks to my application of library and information science, Lucy Lee, Tereza Ilova, etc. in the subject index.
But remember, it’s best not to join at the beginning of a month since you get 10 for free each calendar month. That’s a nice touch!
BUT be sure to download your FastTracked stuff right away, because access to it expires at the end of the month!
You can also buy 10 “Permanent FastTracks” for $9.95. These don’t expire as long as you stay a member, but they can only be used on the site you buy them on.
AND redeeming them on the site is a hassle: find the page before the billing page, click to redeem, get authorization code ... sheesh!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Entirely exclusive british softcore "porn" - but with masturbation.
A pretty rare mix of wellknown uk-models and totally amateurs.
Dirty talk in most videos - with british accents, of course.
Ok amount of videos - right now it's: 379
The newer videos and photosets are what most PUs will consider: Fine/ok - even crisp
For Michelle Thorne-fans this is just a great site - she has a LOT of videos and photosets.
One fine bonus-site: Pantyhosed4u.com
One other bonus site - not worth anything.
Old time lingerie - if you like that.
Cons:
The navigation here is almost a bummer - even if there is a search-machine and a model base.
But no way to search for "only videos" or "only photosets.
Price a bit high.
Updates come only once a week - BUT it now includes both videos and photosets.
Too many of the better looking girls have only photosets.
Very broad variation i model-quality/goodlooking - too many on the ordinary site.
A bit slow download.
Only solo stuff (apart from ONE video with bj) - well, only found one after browsing for weeks.
Bottom Line:
Joined the site because I found some stuff from it with Michelle Thorn and Linda Leigh - great britts - and both damn sexy.
The style here is - like the name indicates: Vintage.
That means that the models are all in lingerie from the 50's, 60's and 70's - and some is really outstanding.
The videos are now up to almost 380 - BUT it's only half of that amout that count to something - in viewing quality.
The newer videos are: 1024x760 - older ones goes down to: 640x480 and even 320x240.
All in WMV only.
The photosets are the same. New ones: 1600x1071 - older ones: not worth it.
But the main deal - apart from the outfit (lingerie) is the style in the videos. They are just dirty - for the solo kinds.
Most models does a fine dirty-talk - in a natural way - and in a way I ALMOST never see in US- solovideos.
If it was not for this dirty-talk, my score here would be quite a bit lower.
But listening to Michelle Thorne or even one video with Lucy Zara telling how horny she is and want to get fucked is worth it all.
Alas there are a little too many of the models that looks quite ordinary (not GOOD looking) - BUT still: even some of these girls end up being very sexy in their performance.
And the fact that they only have photosets of Linda leigh and Misty McCain is a bummer - so even if I'm probably not comming back - I can recommend a months membership - AND it looks like the site is growing - and new models are comming in, so who knows - maybe I'll try it again in six months or a year or so...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
# Only Opaques is hot: a sister site of OT; now they have my money also going to them.
# photosets and models are hot; and have me looking at their sets two hours at a time.
#beautiful models that are on the full figured side and less on the skinny side
#top three softcore picture site that I've been a member of this year- I love these photosets
#not too softcore; Only Tease sister site; i joined this site because i was so taken by Only Tease.
# foot fetish, stocking fetish; boot fetish; foot worship
# updates one photoset a day
# some recent select videos are shot in HD quality
#you can earn fast tracks easily; and see future updates in advance- have not seen this anywhere else
# $19.95 for 30 days- very nice deal for softcore
#Hi rez photos are hi quality in all sizes: 711 x 1066, 1365 x 2048; 2000 x 3000
# forums to give opinions; interact with models
# one of the best collection of models I've seen- top five sites for overall quality of models- they are beautiful
Cons:
# get about 8-9 videos per month; secondary to photosets
# Hd quality is not the super HD variety; and is only applied to select shoots.
# site is not huge- been shooting since August 2006
# this site is not for those who only want to see models naked though there are a few exceptions but for the most part- no.
Bottom Line:
Only Opaques is a great site for softcore lovers who lean towards pictures; and who love full figured models in tights; and in both silky and cotton panties. I also like to see beautiful women in pretty dresses; cute pumps; and cute outfits and you get a lot of that as well as well as close ups of boots; shoes; lovely busts toes and feet.
I found out about Only Opaques because I was a member of Only Tease first- and this is one of their sister sites. For one, the selection of models is great- I dont pass over models like I do other sites. I love their clothes; pretty dresses, the way they pose. Its a site for those who enjoy the way a womans body looks like in clothes; lingerie; garter belts; socks.
I'd recommend this site as a starter site for the whole series of OT sites- for under $20.
If you have read my past reviews- you'd see that i have seen a lot of hardcore; Yes, the softcore that Only Opaques offer is hot enough. and enjoyed this as much as hardcore.
Its the same shoot style as OT. But specializes in hosiery. Lots of super close ups of rear ends; big lovely bras; toes encased in silky hosiery; lovely garter belts and tights in your face; snug panties over volutuous bums; boots in your face; lovely tight skirts over vloutuous bums; nice portrait shots; tight opaque tights stretched over silk and cotton panties; some topless shoots; open leg shots in hosiery; bent over- round rear end in face shots and beautiful models.
I respect Only Opaques. The beauty of their models took my breath away and now have taken my money!!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- as of today: pics come in 2000x 1331 or 1331x2000.
- Videos: Good looking 1280x720 4162kbps Wmv. Downloads in: Dvix; mpg; quicktime, and Wmv in hi resolution -as stated above- and in a nice 852x480 2000kbps. New videos weigh around 500-800 mb's.
- Due to their camerawork we get to watch female legs in rather pleasing perspectives, thus, enhancing their appeal.
-boy vs girls scenes of: Aneta keys with his boyfriend, i believe, a rather ugly guy, this one comes in 704x396 2500kbps ; Sophie Moon, this one comes in 704x528 2650kbps, what a treat is to watch this women in a b/g scene!
-The girls are not loud and are very skilled teasers. male talen't don't batter the women.
- Very good customer support, although they could even reply faster to e-mails.
- Vids of stunning women such as: Zuzana Drabinova; Veronica De Souza, two of them riveting on account of being recent, and therefore looking great; Ines Cudna, Verona aka veronica fasterova; Susana Spears; Maya, LEA TYRON, GOOGLE HER!
Cons:
-Disgusting regional pricing. They apply double standards when it comes to billing their members. i took that into account when i scored the site.
- Videos prior to 2007 don't look good.
-Pictures and videos watermarked.
- Some of the models look downright bored. i assume that the notion of men aroused watching them rubbing their feet bores them stiff.
- they should revamp the quality of their older videos since the models are amazing.
-Downloads didn't come fast for me.
Bottom Line:
- if you're a leg man or you like good looking women you can't miss this site. Barring their freaking regional-pricing practices the site is next to perfect.
-You can add to the above list of stunning models: Monica Sweetheart; Merylin Sekova; Silvia saint (three episodes); Simony Diamond in boy/girl scenes; Regina Ice; Peaches, Kathia Nobili and the list goes on.
-i'd like to add that there are a ton of girl/girl scenes.
- you can stream the vids.
- this is a pro i couldn't add above: to the best of my knowledge, there are no DL limits and i belive that you can use a DL manager if you so choose.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM or other download restrictions.
-Combination of two niches I like, Asian women and pantyhose. Not exclusively Asians though.
-Updates almost every day going back to 8/1/2008.
-Photos are 1200x780 and decent crispness.
-297 photo sets. Each has 50 to 70 photos.
Cons:
-105 videos. The quality is completely unacceptable at 320x240 for nearly every video. A few are 720x480, but with a bitrate of 327.
-Most videos have only one option-WMV. Some are only Realtime.
-No whole video downloads, only clips.
-No streaming options.
-Photos cannot be zipdownloaded.
Bottom Line:
Even without high expectations, the site was a disappointment. Since I am much more into videos than photos, I consider the site to be a disaster. I basically agree with the review by Cucuta, but I feel that it is incomplete regarding some aspects that I very much care about.
The videos are a complete waste of time as well as hard drive space. The quality is as weak (320x240 and grainy) as you can find anywhere, even on amateur sites. The camerawork is invariably poor, missing that quality of eroticism that they should be aiming for. Many of the videos and photosets are overexposed, or have poor coloring, even oversaturation. For a site with many attractive models, this is simply incredible.
The photos are ok and the quantity is good for a niche site. They are softcore, glamour type sets that tease and sometimes are a little more explicit.
The site was first listed on TBP in June 2005, but the oldest material is from 8/2008. There is some older "guest" photo sets from 2004 to 2006. They are promos for other sites, so they are definitely not exclusive. What happened from 2006 to 2008?
After downloading a few videos and a peek at the photos, I complained to the site about the lack of quality. Days later, I have no response, no offer of a refund, only silence. In the email I got from the site after signing up, I was assured of a one hour response time to customer emails. Not recommended for video lovers, and only a weak maybe for those interested in glamour photos.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Mix of asian and non asian models in pantyhose and lingerie
- A terrific, albeit small sight that really 'gets' the slow striptease.
-Also a small collection of videos, mostly of slow stripping.
- Clothing and posing are the strong suites of this sight. The women pose erotically IN THEIR CLOTHES - than continue through each phase of undress -
- Host AkirsLane is very friendly. There is also a forum with free previews.
-Also includes some mild bondage pics.
- Each model has from one to a max of about five photo sets. Each set has about 50-75 picutres.
- Good mix of models and body types with light and dark asians, and cute American girls. Also some more mature women.
-Akira Lane, a voluptuous Asian women with nice round hips is featured in dozens of photo sets and
videos herself.
Only 21.95
Cons:
-Quantity is pretty limited with only about 100 or so models, about half of which are asian.
- This is a softcore sight. Some masterbation, but no sex shots
- Most of the clothing is sexy but some may find some of the sets cheesy. For instance, Akira dressed like a stewardess.
No bonus or additional content
Bottom Line:
I made it through the first 45 years of my life without ever craving Asian girls, however on a trip to Las Vegas one year I noticed a bunch of sexy well dressed Asian girls and came back with "yellow fever". As I explored Asian porn sights I found most were pretty hard core.
This off the beaten path sight is one of the few that I have joined more than once. I like it as it takes beautiful asian women, dresses them in classy clothing and slowly strips them. On the way there are a generous number of pantyhose and sexy undergarment shots.
There is a decent amount of content, I counted 120 models, but not enough to last more than a week or so for a hungry downloader.
The videos are similar to the photos with slow striptease being the forte.
Some of the most beautiful asian ladies are to be found here. Both lighter skin Japaneese typss and darker skinned south Asians, Hawaiins etc. Some models may be familiar to those who frequent Asian sights -Mika Tan, Sanny Aung etc.
Of the non Asians, some are familiar faces like Kordelia Devonshire, and there is a good mix of different types here also.
If you like pantyhose and Asians and are seeking a sight that delivers in a very understated erotic way, I highly recommend it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A good sized archive of pictures. Probably 400-700 models
- A large variety of model types from every category (young/old, vanilla/ethinic, skinny/voluptous etc.
- picture sets are sorted by either model or by "specialty sets" including peeping Tom, Socks, Panty pudding, undercurrent, hose beast etc.
- There is a real paper and ink magazine (remember those) that goes with the site and you can also navigate that way.
- Models go from good to excellent
- Content also has a large variety including sets featuring generic stripping, toys, and boy/girl, girl/girl scenerios.
- There are sets with slow peeling of clothes and many photos in various stages of undress.
- Well maintained site - includes forum, frequent updates, what's new, etc.
Videos are presented by model or directly in video window. There are both short and long videos and most can be either downloaded or viewed streaming.
- Got in on the 19.95 special
-Picutres are avaiable in medium or large size (800 vs 1600)
Cons:
- Picture quality was not always up to current standards. Many pictures are small and washed out looking.
- Also many pictures look highly air brushed. Others have white clothes on white background which lose definition.
- Many models have only a single 20 picture photo set. Others have only a single 60 picture photo set. Very few have more than one or two photo sets, so when you find a model you really like you don't have the quantity of her to go after.
-Pictures appear out of sequence. The girl many strip down and the next ten photos have her with here clothes on again.
- I am not sure what a leg fetish sight is. I was looking for a little harder edged version of the "only tease" type sights/
Bottom Line:
I am not sure what a leg fetish sight is. I was looking for a little harder edged version of the "only tease" type sights and came away a bit disappointed. I am a photo guy not a video guy and about half the pictures are too old and washed out to be useful. The most recent content is much better and there are about 5 or 6 models that hit it right on the nail - Extravagant lingerie or tight clothing, slow stripping, nice posing in clothes and out.
My bottom line is I think in this age of specialization, this sight is too broad based. Are they a lingerie/glamour sight? Are they a foot fetish sight? (What is a leg fetish anyway)
Are they a standard photo sight? Are they a pantyhose sight?
I don't want to trash LEGSEX because I got some really good photos out of it - just not enough.
For example I am just about done with my membership and I have downloaded 403 pictures from LEGSEX. I went to my Only Tease directory and the total from there was 1,919.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ 3 day full access trial for $6 through TBP
+ Full access to 8 other sites (Swankpass network)
+ 960 photo shoots and 343 vids
+ Zip download available
+ No download limits or DRM
+ Smallish watermarks
Cons:
- Search function doesn't work & no model directory
- Pic sizes max out at 1020 x 680
- Vids max out at 640 x 480
- About 50% of vids downloadable in clips only
- Mostly nonexclusive contact
- Updates about once a week
Bottom Line:
For the price I figured this one was worth a trial. I figured it wouldn't be HotlegsandFeet but I was still hopeful of getting some decent leg shots. As they say "hope springs eternal" ... and this site is just another mediocre pit stop on that long eternal road.
Legaction started as a magazine (the other 8 network sites are also mag oriented). These sites never seem to have their act together enough put out a quality web based product and this one is no different.
Most of this stuff is nonexlusive as they farmed out a lot of the photography. For the hardcore stuff, most of this comes from Deny DiFranco (DDF) so if you've been to his sites recently skip this place. The rest of the hc is stuff you've probably already seen on other mega sites. The solo material has more stuff I haven't seen before but I can't vouch for exclusivity.
The girls here range from known pornstars to amateurs to milfs. The quality of the sets/scenes varies greatly from poor to good.
Pictures: As I said, pics max out at 1020 x 680. The photo archieves date back to 1997 but the sets prior to 2006 are crap. You get about 8 - 16 shots per set there (aka: worthless). The newer stuff spreads out to about 60 to 250 shots. Unfotunately, most of the good stuff (aka newer) is also the stuff you've probably seen already. The quality is average (nothing HQ about it). Most of the pics are solo with about 25% being HC and lez.
Video: There is only a couple years worth of video but only half have full length downloads available. The full downloads range from about 20 to 90 minutes. You can download in wmv, ipod or watch in flash. The older clip based stuff is strange in that you get 3 or 4 short clips with the last clip having most of the content and length. Again, you've probably seen a lot of this stuff from the DDF sites and other megasites. Quality is so-so; the full length clips at, say, 40 minutes long only come in at about 250 mb in file size. About half the vids are HC and the rest solo or lez.
The search function looks good but it doesn't work. You can only search under vids or pics and even then the layout is random, not by date. A lot of models, especially in the pics, have only a first name or no name at all or a "wrong" name so good luck there. There is a model directory.
As a bonus you get a slew of crappy 3rd party streaming feeds that I thought went extinct years ago (thus providing proof of "nonintelligent design" at this site): When's the last time you've seen a streaming vids options at 56k, 128k or 250k? The 8 other network sites are similar to here but have their own content and niches.
As another mild downer, when I ran my card the confirmation page didn't appear. Thus, I had to venture to my email to confirm everything.
Basically, for you leg lovers this site is more like a hamhock then a beautiful gam. The only reason this one scores in the 70's is because of the volume of content and network availability.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ $8, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ No DRM
+ Mostly exclusive content
+ Mostly attractive shaved Eastern Eurpean hotties in stockings
+ 296 photo sets of about 100 pics each with no watermarks
Cons:
- Update schedule irregular (3+ months since the last update at the time I joined)
- Photo quality a bit grainy
- No zips on photo sets
- No search function and no model info
- Only 46 vids of mediocre quality
- Some cross marketing for their other sites
Bottom Line:
No way to sum this one up other than your standard eastern european goulash. The site caters to the 18-23 hotties who parade around in their stockings. The offerings are pretty softcore.
Pictures: This is basically a pic site. All pics come in at 1200 by 800 with "nyet" zips. I counted about 15 h/c sets, a couple of lez and the rest were solo with only about 30 playing with toys out of the 296. I was a little miffed because a lot of the pics appeared a bit grainy to me. Part of this is because I'm thinking these are old sets and some may be scanned. I recognized some of the sets (it's mostly exclusive from what I can tell) and they date back to maybe around the year 2000. A few sets were obviously nothing but screen caps. Still the quality was acceptable for the most part.
Videos: You'd have more fun eating undercooked borscht than watching these things. I only downloaded a few but they were grainy, come only in WMV format, and clocked in size-wise at 350x290. They also chew up a lot of space for the quality you get (100 to 500 mb per clip). Most are split scenes, not whole vids. You get about 20 h/c scenes. Most of these scenes do not have picture set equivalents.
The site has an amateurish feel to it. No search, no model info. Just 15 pages of photo sets and 4 pages of vids. There are about 65 models here so most have multiple sets to offer. Most of the girls were cute and I admit that I did download about 50 sets but what a pain given the lack of zips.
This site gets a 73 for iffy quality, irregular updates (we all like to be regular, don't we?), no model info or search function, no zips and lack of quantity and quality of video. What saves it from dipping below the Mendoza Line of 70 is the quanity of decent looking babes.
It costs you $8 for a 3 day trial. Don't worry, you'll be done in a day if you decide to go. Don't bother going back.
I will note that when you cancel (billing through ccbill) you get an offer to continue at $15 a month. If you join up you'll also get access to 10 other sites that the webmasters own. Assuming what they have to offer on those sites is like here, I obviously opted to save a few bucks. Somebody needs to call the Kremlin and tell that the USSR is kaput and they need to get with the times.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A site that is reasonably true to its niche.
Mostly mature amateur models.
Picture and Video quality, while not outstanding, is reasonable. New videos are 640x480 at 1000 bitrate.
Picture sets are zipped, however ... see below.
Cons:
The more I look and download the more I realize that the site is actually nothing but a tease to encourage you to purchase their DVDs. at a steep price in my opinion. I saw one that sold for 35 British Pounds.
Video segments are poorly organized and it takes a lot of searching to find part one or part two of a series. Once all the parts are found it usually amounts to no more than a ten - fifteen minute excerpt of a Video that has no beginning or end for the above mentioned reasons.
Most picture sets are duplicates of the incomplete videos and can be downloaded zipped but beware, most sets are small and still require multiple zips .. one per page of pictures.
Bottom Line:
I must confess to having mixed feelings about this site. On the one hand it is refreshing to see mature women in old-fashioned underwear, something very appealing to someone over fifty, well, appealing to me, anyway and I'm enjoying the "teases", as frustrating as they are in their incompleteness.
On the other hand, however, I have seen some of the models on other mature sites and, most importantly, I really don't like having spent a subscription fee just to be used by a site shilling their products.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ZIP downloads of both 800 and 1600px versions of the galleries offered
+A lot of models
+Star directory with headshots
+There is a model search but it is only accessed on the model directory page
+They have all the picture sets categorized by model, yes, but they also categorize them by magazine issue, going all the way back to their 2001 series.
+Good mix of American and Non-American models
+All updates are archived back to 2004, retaining their addition date (however that date is not displayed on the actual page for the update)
+A little fun addition - feet around the office. A few feet pics every couple of days. This is a leg/feet site.
+Downloads work with download managers
Cons:
-A good portion of the galleries are small...very small
-All images watermarked
-All videos watermarked
-Because LegSex has been around for a while (in magazine form, not so much for the website) they feature girls before their prime, and as such the girls use very old aliases (or other unknown ones). Maxxx=Brooke Stone, Scotti Andrews=Clare, Sheila Rossi=Tina.
-Most models are one-and-done, meaning only one update.
-They have movies, but they are so hard to find. You click the section titled "Move it!". Nope, its not called "videos" or "movies"..."Move it!"
-Downloads have generic file names (scene.wmv, 1600.zip)
-Videos offered only in WMV
-Solo content outnumbers hardcore content by a wide margin
-Update schedule stinks...2-3 updates per week, most are just image updates, not many video updates
-The tour page looks better than the actual members page.
Bottom Line:
Just another porn site...put it that way. Not enough is offered to put it in the same league as DDF Productions' HotLegsAndFeet.
There are some old models on here who I certainly like and were looking for (Sheila aka Tina, Brooke aka Maxxx, Scotti aka Clare, etc.) but the site does not offer much OF THEM. It is one gallery here, one gallery there...and all the galleries are 20 pictures, standard. I think the pictorals are more, but there aren't many pictorals...most galleries are just the pics which were featured in their magazine, in other words, 20 pictures :P.
It says a lot when the TOUR page looks better than the MEMBERS page. The TOUR model directory looks so much better than the MEMBERS model directory.
It also is a pain in the neck that everything is so hard to find. I spend quite some time looking for the movies, briefly going so far as just assuming there were none. Everything is not named properly...Videos section is called "Move it", pictorals are called "Pic-toe-rals". Quit the fancy and just stick with what works.
If you want a Legs and Feet site, stick with HotLegsAndFeet from DDF Productions...its a hell of a lot better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill.
-No DRM, download restrictions or other unnecessary problems.
-Download managers supported.
-Part of network with 8 sites with unusual focuses.
-Attractive girls for the most part. Not the usual pornstars either. Spanish or Portuguese girls.
-Nice quality videos. Neither my computer or the website provides any details.
Cons:
-Site appears to be without a focus. The girls don't always start with baby dolls. With so few videos, I expect them to stay within the niche.
-Only 13 movies and no photo sets at all. Needs serious growth.
-Only four download options. Ipod, low mpeg, high mpeg and flash.
-Ordinary sex.
Bottom Line:
The name of the site is very misleading, as it is not a clothing fetish site in the way it is presented. The baby dolls are not the focus, in fact the action starts without any clothing teasing at all. It struck me as just an ordinary gonzo site, but with better quality videos. The other clothing sites in the network were much hotter, better presented and unusual if not unique. I could see jeans, or miniskirts as a clothing fetish, and baby dolls should work as well. A disappointment compared to those, but otherwise an ok site that is just too small. Thirteen videos is not much by anyone's standards.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Epoch.
-Fairly attractive girls for the most part. All have nice legs, a necessity for a leg site.
-Inexpensive trial option.
-Access to 12 other sites. Mostly they are very small and not very interesting though.
-No DRM or other download restrictions.
-Updates weekly.
Cons:
-Not enough teasing for a site of this genre. Nearly every video has a dildo being used about halfway through it.
-No BG or GG. I thought this would be a plus, but all you get is the same old, same old masturbation without any enthusiasm. Dull.
-Could use a little variety in age, body shape.
and ethnicity. Only one model is not white, for example.
-Could use a search engine. Many models have multiple videos and photo sets.
Bottom Line:
This site surprised me in several ways. The biggest surprise is that without any sex, just masturbation, that they could make a site so lacking in tease and erotic buildup. The main page states: "show off what you like best, long sexy legs." It is not really very good at that. It is occasionally explicit, but I joined for the legs and the costumes. If seeing split open pussy and ass while wearing nylons is your thing, you may like this site more than I did. Lots of sites feature explicit nudity; I could have joined one of them. The next surprise was that I liked the photos (95 sets) better than the videos (40). The photos (1024x682) are zipdownloadable by page, but not for the whole set. The videos are wmv only, 640x480, 2211 kbps and about 10 to 20 minutes each, so there just isn't much quantity at 40 videos. They are not available to stream and only downloadable as whole movie. There are two choices as to quality. I am a video guy and found them very dull and predictable. Typical gonzo style with overly made up pornstars, overacting, stereotypical clothes and poor camerawork. In contrast, the photos include not only sets of screenshots, but also sets with the models wearing a variety of the usual costumes e.g. teacher, secretary, etc. The bottom line here is that I feel there just isn't enough quality or even quantity to keep my interest.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Site is amazing if you love character. When you join the site, you immediately get access to a bonus site, then, after each 7 day period as a member, you get access to another. There are some really bizarre bonus sites that are way not my style, but there are at least 4 or 5 that make this site worthwhile.
Models always have clothing on, and typically panty hoes. There is an appearance of role playing, but it's in another language, so who knows what they're saying.
Very little vag penetration, almost entirely anal. Definitely a sense of submission in the female models.
If you're looking for something new and want the girls to keep some clothes on, this is a must join.
The male models don't get in the way, nor are they objectionable.
Cons:
The bonus sites are really bizarre. Lots of gay/tranny/girl on guy stuff, but you don't have to add them.
Video quality isn't HD or even crystal clear, but it's decent.
Not many updates, nor a ton of pre-existing content. But again, the stuff that's on there is great.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Full access trial membership.
-Bill through CCBill.
-The newest videos can be downloaded in one file. DVD quality AVI but 640x480.
-306 photo sets. Zipdownloadable 1505x1000. Mostly if not all screenshots.
Cons:
-Not many models, about a dozen. They each have multiple videos and photo sets.
-Most videos on the site, 127 out of 143, are not downloadable as one link and are 320x240.
-Not download manager supported. Very slow downloads.
-The models are not much to look at but most have nice legs. Two models have too skinny, shapeless legs.
-The site is in English, but the actors speak a Slavic language that I don't recognize. Some may see this as a plus as many sites blab too much and this can detract from the eroticism.
-No model information or search engine. There is no way to easily find videos of a particular model, except by scrolling through all the videos on the site. The contents are listed as the site updates.
-There is no update schedule.
-Uninspired sex. I was expecting an emphasis on the leg and nylon aspects, but that seems to be unimportant here. I want legs and great girls, not dull sex while wearing nylons.
Bottom Line:
This site is not better than the usual for the genre; it may even be weaker than the others. I have yet to find a good site with a legs and nylons theme. Even for a trial I was expecting more. The visuals were just not exciting. I was expecting a lot more of great legs in nylons with attractive models, but this site just doesn't deliver that elusive quality that makes a site work. Uninspired sex with plain models, with too many low quality videos that you need to download in parts. Not recommended even as a full access trial.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
This review will repeat at the other OT sites as they are all part of 1 network (I joined for $44.95 per month to all 5).
OnlyTease is a teasing site (Not a porn site - no hardcore, minimal full nudity, light play, softcore content). Most of the models are British. Videos average around 40-70 megs per peice and there will be 1 video per photoshoot. Most if not all photoshoots will be shot in both film and video (posted separately on the site). Videos last 4-6 minutes mostly and are almost always the same - striptease. Sometimes there is music and sometimes talking/teasing.
Photos are well done. Most sets are available via Zip download in 3 different formats - up to very high quality - 50-70meg zip files for 100 photos.
Models - Many beautiful women are available here. Many models will appear on other sites - ie Kate Harrington or Lucy Zara - many will not. For many, you will only find them on the OnlyTease family of sites.
Cons:
Content is generally the same. Do not join the site looking for moaning and groaning etc. This is about all types of hosiery and outfits on sexy girls...doing sexy British girl type things! That's it! Videos could be longer...scenes could be more original!
Bottom Line:
This site has one of my highest ranks because it's f'ing fantastic at what it aims to be.
OnlyTease has the largest collection of this kind of tease on the net. Some of the content is boring...some is just f'ing hot. Women like Emma Harper, Natalia, Natasha Marley, Nikki F, Sophia Smith...there are hundreds of models - they are just so sexy...sometimes this hits the spot.
You will not be disappointed if you have the funds to spare. All of their sites are worth joining.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Discounted price through TBP.
-Part of a network of 14 sites.
-15 nice quality about a half hour long videos that range from 720x480 to 1920x1080, 3595kbps.
-14 of the videos also have photos. They can be zipdownloaded and recent ones are 1440x965. Nice photos, but they are not enough.
-DRM and download limit free.
-Download managers are supported.
Cons:
-Only 15 about half hour long videos. The site was started in April and only recently began weekly updates.
-The sex focuses on women's feet getting guys off and then they come on their feet. Not my fetish.
-It is not clear if the videos are exclusive.
Bottom Line:
This site has well known pornstars that wear erotic outfits and emphasizes their pantyhose. The stars are sexy, but the scenes are too focused on feet for my taste. I like pantyhose, but not foot fetish material. This site is part of a network, but doesn't have anything much in common with the older sites facialabuse.com and ghettogaggers.com. The other network sites have completely unrelated focuses, so if you like foot fetish videos, you don't get much in the network. The bottom line is that the tiny quantity of videos that they do have appeal to a particular fetish and don't have enough general appeal, unless perhaps if you are interested in a particular pornstar. They are too few to make this site a reason to join the network.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exclusive content.
- High quality photosets.
- Good videos quality.
- Great website design.
- Navigation is way to easy.
- ZIP download format for photosets offered.
- Daily updates.
- No DRM videos protection.
- No download limit.
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
- Good collection.
- Good looking models.
- Cool members forum and search models feature.
- Content is daited.
- Good monthly subscription price.
Cons:
- No network access offered with standart membership.
- No trial option.
- More videos download options needed.
- Videos quality could be better.
- No hardcore content.
- No interaction with models.
- No models info.
Bottom Line:
Only-Opaques is a very adult website.
First of all, members gain access to a good sized collection which can surely make them happy for a month or even more. Photosets can be downloaded in three formats (standard, extra large and ultra large format) so their quality is awesome. ZIP download option is offered making is simple and easy. Videos can be downloaded only in one format (.avi) in high or low resolution but there quality could be even better at my opinion. Also, more download options in here would be cool.
Website design is very good and navigation is very easy especially with models search feature offered. Updates come daily and content is daited. From the other hand, there is no interaction with site's models or models info.
Monthly subscription price is good for the content offered but there you must pay extra for network access. Moreover, there is no trial option offered which would be very cool. Content is solo so there is no hardcore offered. Models, generally, look very good. Also, there is a cool members forum.
There is no DRM videos protection or download limit. Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day). Content is exclusive.
In conclusion, if you are into such content then you should definitely try Only-Opaques.com
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is a great web-site if you like pantyhose sex or anything to do with nylons. I stayed a member of this site for about 3 months and downloaded pretty much all of the content I wanted.
These are mostly russian girls. The models are pretty good looking and the sex is hot. I liked that the models were NOT the super perfect type Some of the models were ordinary women dressed in hot outfits ready for sex.
Each week a new site is added to the original site. They go from e-pantyhose, stocking sex, anal pantyhose, lesbian pantyhose, mature, etc. The pictures are downloaded via zip files. The videos are pretty sharp but are downloaded in about 5 minute parts. Usually about 4 or 5 parts to a clip.
I thought many of the video stories were interesting. Often office sex or seduction themes, some bondage.
I thought my money was well spent on this unique site. I haven't found anything else as good as this site so I rated it highly.
Cons:
I would prefer the videos be downloaded as a single file.
I would have stayed longer if the content was kept up but it doesn't look like they add stuff very often. But there is a lot to download so you can enjoy for at least a few months.
No customer service. I sent a couple of questions to the company and no response. Maybe they don't speak English.
They use the same models alot. This is both good bad. If you like the models its great seeing them over and over again. I think more new ones along with more content would have been nice
Bottom Line:
If you like nylons and pantyhose this site is great! The sex is hot and it's was a real turn-on for me many times over. Well worth the monthly fee in my opinion. This is the best nylon/pantyhose site I have seen.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Does a good job catering to ALL aspects of the
leg and foot fetish.
- Excellent video and picture quality for most of the content.
- Plenty of content overall
- Zip sets in large and small sizes
- Frequent updates.
- Wide variety of models
- Easy to use (and varied) navigation features.
- Distinctive personality touches throughout the site.
Cons:
- No network access
- Older videos and pic sets lacking a bit in quality (definitely in the minority however).
- No site interaction (forums, fellow users)
- A few major inaccuracies in the "search" functions, forcing users to use alternative methods to get to certain content.
Bottom Line:
Overall this site has to be considered one of the top two or three leg and foot fetish sites out there. The videos look great, and have that uniquely bright studio like quality that the Score Group is known for. Obviously the pics are also very good with this being a magazine related site. The content is varied nicely between solo and hardcore; with just the right amount of unpredictability and flair.
HOW DOES IT COMPARE TO SITES OF ITS KIND:
Some might compare this site negatively to a site like HotLegsandFeet. Now I have to admit I have never been a member there (HotLegsandFeet), but I think that Legsex, while not better, should be looked at a bit differently. It really depends on what you're into. HotLegsandFeet focuses almost soley on young Euro models, with heavily airbrushed styled content. Legsex OTH has a much wider variety of models in terms of both age and ethnicity. And while Legsex's content does have high production values, it doesn't come off as being overly staged; they do an excellent job walking that fine line.
I won't bother to mention any other sites in this niche, as to me most of them are not "full service". Meaning they usually will cater to only ONE aspect of the fetish,(such as pantyhose/nylons or feet alone).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site has a couple of beautiful models
- Exclusive content
- Videos of some "hard to find" models
- Access to a forum where you can talk to the models and other members of the site
- Resolution choices vary from 640x480 to 3888x2592
Cons:
- Navigation is a bit akward
- No Zip-sets of the galleries (which can be over 300 pics/set)
- Otherwise a pretty good photoset viewer
- Poor quality on some videos
- only 42 models to date
- Overpriced based on contents ($39.99/1 month)
Bottom Line:
As most of these new sites that offers "nude art" it's obvious that it's a rip off of good ol' Met art. But this site features new models and is in my mind worth a try. Of course it's a bit on the pricy side, but be sure to check out the preview before you decide - http://www.glamourflower.com/models.php
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some models have really pretty feet and no how to pose them.
Cons:
Lighting in most cases is extremely poor. One set had a model with gorgeous feet, but most of the shots were made with the sliding door in the background. The light streaming in completely silouhetted the subject. Terrible.
When shooting, the photographer is constantly leaving the feet OUT of the frame! Very frustrating. Your following the models feet. She's posing them really well, you're ready to pop, and GOODBYE, there out of the frame. Start over.
Bottom Line:
Save your money until the photographer gets his lighting and subject down. Hello? FOOT Factory?! I go elsewhere for T and A.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ gorgeous Brandi doing special shoots for foot-fetishists incl. feet in heels and stockings, wearing jewellery on her feet, cum on feet and foot jobs.
+ picture size is 960x1280 pixels since 07/2006 and 768x1024 for updates since 05/2005. Older updates have lower resolution.
+ updates start in 2003.
+ trial option at $9.95 for 2 days works.
+ membership gives access to brandi4u.com and the whole Wild Rose Network.
Cons:
- not enough updates and content if there wasn't the membership to the other sites.
- content might not be specific enough for those who love feet but at least she does have nice feet.
- sometimes repetitive content
- video sizes and quality are an issue.
- no ZIP files (but friendly to download managers)
Bottom Line:
As written above I would consider footprints4u.com as an addition to her first site brandi4u.com. She does a lot to satisfy her customers being focused on female feet but I'm not sure if this is enough to satisfy them. Any foot lovers here that can give a more detailed statement?
Even fewer updates as on her other site with 50 in 2003, 21 in 2004, 23 in 2005, 15 in 2006 and less than that in 2007. Still the quality and size (since 05/2005) is more than o.k. with me.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- High Quality, DDF site
- Pictures go up to 2000 on high end and are available to download in zips.
- Newer movies are HD and there are over 900 video clips
- Site has a classy feel to it, maybe it is because of the emphasis on legs and feet?
- I'm getting some of my best download speeds, over 1100kb/s on a 10M connection
- Just about every great model you know who Europe that are the other DDF sites, and there is a lot of content overall!
Cons:
- You know things are good when I start nitpicking on the first con, I'm not going to say the price is too high, but I guess it is just seems that way at first, price on TBP despite having an American dollar sign is in Euros. So, as of now, what is listed as $24.95 on TBP is actually $36.74.
- Older movies are a lower quality than average, this can be a slight negative if your favorite model has a lot of older material.
- More fishnet, can never get fishnet!
Bottom Line:
Let me start by saying that I love this site. The quality is top level, very few sites can even match it. The emphasis of leg and feet kind of worried me since I don't have a real leg or feet fetish. The model list pulled me in though. If you can name her and she is a Euro star, she is on here.
The biggest and best surprise for me was the amount of content. I really hadn't seen much of this site before joining. It reminds me a great deal of 1byday, DDF's big site. There is less hardcore here, but you get a new kind of porn from this site. One that lets you look at the women as beautiful. It has a very high tease factor in every video that I downloaded. Which for me is very important.
The HD videos are incredible. My only complaint there is that I have to keep buying external hard drives to store all of the content I download.
Pictures are very clear, let me add the word, "clean". No blurriness, just clear, well-lit pictures in 2000 resolution. Some of the models really show that they belong on a runway, moreso than in front of a camera with a dildo. Eve Angel's clip with Eufrat, both in nurses outfits, made me want to check in the hospital for a month or so!
The negatives are far and few between. Price will catch US members off guard, but I've been to enough crappy $20 per month sites, that I don't mind putting out the $36 for this high quality content that I keep and watch more than 1 time.
I recommend this site with as much enthusiam as possible!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ full trial access 3days/5,77€
+ regular membership access to 9more sides
+ no dl limit
+ no dmr
+ regular updates
+ pics 1200*797
+ 225 fotosets with >90 fotos
+ exclusive content
Cons:
- 16 x 1 up to 3 videos
- webpage design looks strange
- no extras
- average video quality
- could use more content
- only mpeg format
Bottom Line:
a side to download totally exclusive material. i do prefer video dowloads. the girls are the type of next door girls, so it`s content is like an amateuer page which makes the videos crispy for me. even if some of the girls are not that pretty the action gives you a good feeling.
i do not know if the other sides are worth making the regular membership. if they are like this side, i think you can give it a try.
For me interesting, the video sets are devideed into one up to three girl contended sets. you have solo styles, toy styles and hardcore. sadly some of the video material has got poor quality.
i am pleased with the stocking side, but in my opinion it needs some more growth especially in the video section. why no hd videos?
All in all this side is because of his low trial price and of the exclusive videos worth a try and i will come surely back when they rise theire amount of videos , quality of videos and lifted up to hd quality.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
