Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 24 videos, the most recent of which go all the way up to an impressive resolution of 1920x1080, and down to 320x 240 if you want the video fast. And the videos DO download fast. this network has one of the fastest download speeds I have seen.
- 32 photo sets at 1440px × 810px with zipped archives available. Each set has around 200+ photos and they look very good.
- the girls are very varied and you can see them in several scenes around the network. We have girls from the barely legal category all the way to borderline MILF. Which is really nice.
- each scene is focused on the girls legs and the panties they are wearing. There is an impressive variation in the girls outfits and stockings are ripped open quite often AKA the sex is pretty energetic, but much tamer than the Facial Abuse stuff.
- the girls often play with themselves before the sex scene, there is oral sex, I believe some anal and some groupsex as well, so that's nice and varied.
Cons:
- a network wide search would have been nice. I really like Amai Liu and I would have liked to find all her scenes at once. Also a category search for videos would be nice. Something to allow me to select anal scenes without having to browse the thumbnails...
- you can see the difference between the older sets both in quality of video as well as how beautiful the girls are. The site is definitely improving, but I only enjoyed the more recent stuff, to be honest...
- sometimes the preview thumbnail was not the bets shot out of the scene. I'd like it if there was a way to maybe make the previews interactive (roll mouse over) or if there was a model page or something similar...A lot of hot girls didn't stand out like this...
Bottom Line:
As part of the network and with the discount from PU this site will be interesting for any leg lover. However the fact that there are only 24 videos doesn't make it a must. It's more of a nice bonus if you joined the network for another, bigger site.
However, many scenes are well done and the variation makes it interesting. After a few more updates this site will be a really great place for anyone who wants to see girls having sex in pantyhose. If you're looking for more softcore stuff, this isn't really the place for you. The girls won't strip for half the video and turn around showing off their but through pantyhose. Sex and cumming on stockings is the big draw. Also there aren't any footjobs, really, which in my book is a big bonus, but some people might dislike it.
Finally, I'd like to say that I noticed a tendency of having more Asian models among the recent updates. Which is also a good thing in my opinion, but maybe others will disagree. Up to personal preference I guess.
Bottom line: not a deal maker here but definitely a nice bonus to an overall decent network for those who prefer hardcore porn.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
With over 34,000 images, Elise Erotic can boast a huge catalog of fetish images, dedicated primarily to lovers of pantyhose, stockings, heels and feet. Most recent images are 1177×1704 pixels and of a generally high technical standard. Updates appear on a regular basis, each one split over two weeks.
There's no doubting Elise looks fantastic in hose and heels – she has great legs – and there are some really excellent galleries, the location shoots being particular highlights. A wide variety of outfits means there should be something for everyone, but if not, you can always contact Elise with your own request.
Although the premise of the shoots hasn't changed, there has been a recent trend towards more nudity. Whereas previously Elise's vagina would be only barely visible through various types of sheer material in one or two images per set (if you were lucky), now there's some clear frontal nudity creeping in, although still a far cry from spreading or hardcore.
Cons:
When the site was founded, Elise had a beautiful, natural figure, but using the gallery dates as a guide, at some point in late 2003 she underwent surgery and returned with some really horrible and pretty weird-looking breast implants. Although (thankfully) they're never fully revealed – sheer tops are as far as Elise will go – they don't suit her at all. The huge library of pre-op images only serves as a reminder of what a beautiful, natural figure she once had.
The other major negative is the site design, which is woefully out-of-date and does nothing to enhance the user experience; photo sets aren't dated and zip files, the links for which aren't on the gallery pages, are few and far between. There is also a complete lack of meaningful supplementary content. There are a handful of tiny videos in an antiquated format, an ancient guest book page and a few member galleries. The live chat has been off-line for as long as I can remember and the last webcam show was in 1999.
Bottom Line:
Elise Erotic really is hit-and-miss. On the positive side, Elise has great legs and there is a huge number of images. Unfortunately there is also a general lack of imagination and variation when it comes to shoots, so while the outfits may vary, the locations rarely do.
The trend towards more nudity is welcome, but it's about eight years too late. Personally speaking, the less of Elise's fake tits I see the better, seriously, she's a lot sexier when she keeps them covered up. Given the strengths of the older galleries, when Elise was a more natural-looking, girl-next-door type, a few more daring shoots back then would've been just the ticket.
Say what you like about the subject and Elise herself, there's no arguing that the website itself is dreadful. Quite apart from it appearing to be designed fifteen years ago, the navigation is misleading and in some cases dysfunctional. For example, currently there are twenty-six main galleries but the left-hand navigation only extends to twenty-four, and on some pages to only twenty-one, so it's easy to miss the latest additions. Each main gallery is divided into (on average) nine separate shoots, but none are dated. Only the most recent galleries have zip files but their download links are located on a different page entirely.
It's annoying that each set is posted in two halves, on average fifty/sixty images at a time over a period of a week. But here's a tip; although the HTML navigation pages for each gallery go on-line in two halves, all the images are uploaded in one go, so if you use a download manager or guess at their URLs, they're easy to find. That means you can view all the images in a set without a long wait, but effectively reduces the number of site updates to a paltry two per month.
In terms of video, the site is light years behind what everyone else is doing. With three exceptions, all thirty-six clips are presented in Real Media versions 3 and 4, formats that all but died out back in the last century. In addition, they're all the size of postage stamps, none larger than 320×240, including the most recent posting in Windows Media format. The video content itself is acceptable, in fact Elise's voice reminds me of Jodie Foster and she has a fun, personable nature, but the technical aspects of the video let the whole side down.
Would I recommend the site? Err... tough call. It's inexpensive to join and if you don't expect much you'll probably be pleased with the huge number of photos, especially if you're a fan of the genre. Recent shoots have more spice, and that'll hopefully continue, but if you're looking for video content you'll be sorely disappointed and if you're troubled by disfigured chests, look away or concentrate on the older material. For a month or two the site is worth a try, but probably doesn't have much mileage. If you're a fan of Elise, rejoin every twelve months or so, with just one month's subscription you'll be caught up in next to no time.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Hard pushed to list any. 400+ galleries
Cons:
Very badly laid out
No formats or catagories
Cannot download in zip format
Sets look like pictures are missing and almost like they only bought 1/2 of a complete set.
HardCore images miss out the cumshot! WTF?
Bottom Line:
Dont bother wasting your money. I am very dissapointed by this site and feel very let down.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The dude below me gave the stats so I will concentrate on content, service and overall 'delivery of goods'.
Excellent quality and fast download speeds(4MBit) 1280x720
Multi formats
Decent sets
Nut burstingly horny babes
Good support (now)
Good camera work
Classy and pro presentation
Exclusive content
'Casting' shorts are a great addition
Stockings (about fukin time)
Cons:
REGIONAL damn pricing
Not enough updates
Some 'movement' of content from other DDF sites and some recycled older low res quality, although both are not repeated content
Not enough ethnic babes
Too many solos and same 'format' dudes
Not enough location shoots although the shoots are classy
Older films are low res and many models not repeated again
Bottom Line:
If you're into legs n shit, like I am, then this site is the leader in it's genre/field.
Stunning babes wearing hot gear in cool locations and emphasis being on feet and legs they do not disappoint.
The exclusive content is one of it's attractions. You will get the odd 'known' babe but the scenes are still exclusive.
I could do with more variety in terms of ethnic babes, guys who don't 'machine-gun' rump the babes as sometimes it's nice to 'see' the sex, maybe some better location shoots and re-introduction of babes from their back catalogue would be a winner.
The regional pricing stinks and I for one am really fukin sick of this shit. You can't call a 'small person' a midget any more unless you want your nuts torched and your house sold in compensation, but you can charge what the fuk you like when it comes to us in the UK.
I love this site but due to their slow updates and regional pricing it's not one I would stay a member of on a monthly and regular basis.
I also believe, much like other 'umbrella' sites, that there should be a discounted membership for those who want to sign up to all the DDF sites. It makes sense and keeps the variety and update aspect manageable.
Had it not been for the updates and regional pricing practices I would have thrown a few more points on the overall score. And until sites realise that we ARE their income streams and they stop treating us as if they are doing us favours then maybe the scores would grow and sites would establish a long and loyal paying customer base.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Many, many beautiful women
+No toys and almost no “messy” stuff with food or bath goop
+Intuitive interface
+Fast downloads, sometimes over 2Mbps
+Can preview the content of upcoming 3-4 updates on each site
+Earned or purchased ” FastTracks” allow full access to galleries or videos of your choosing ahead of their posting schedule
+VOLUMES of all-exclusive content available now, plus several hundreds of updates yet to be posted (Coming soon --> select “View all sets available for FastTrack”)
+Very user-friendly site/network. You get 10 free “FastTracks” in a calendar month (whole network, not per site); set several viewing and browsing preferences; and go from one site in the network to another with ease once your use/passes are stored in your browser.
+Photos from the past couple of years come in three sizes: 1066, 2048, and 3000 pixels.
+Consistently good lighting and clarity in photos from Jan. 2007 on.
+No DRM
+Model pages list other sites, outside the network, she appears in
Cons:
-Occasional slow navigation and sudden timeouts
-Thumbs with dead links (rare)
-Must train browser to auto-enter use/pass for downloads on subsequent logins (separate for pics and videos); doable with Firefox, but it’s still 18 times for everything in the network: (access + zips + vids) x 6
-Zips before Dec. 2007 require drilling through five levels of folders to get to the images folder (hold cntrl down while drilling to prevent desktop clutter).
-Some unattractive women
-Quite a few women never get fully undressed, like Gemma Massey (too bad!)
-High monthly network access price ($44.95)
-The “fast track” system is rather complicated; note expiry dates and other restrictions
-Boring videos: Only avi, 640x480, 3-6 minutes long. 40-50 per month (whole network) in 2009. (Image quality improves through the years, but it’s never nearly as good as the photos. Sound might be techno muzik, the girl talking, or just the air near the mic.)
Bottom Line:
I thought this network would be nothing but undressing to panties, if that, so I stayed away. But one day at OnlyTease, I tried their search (for visitors) and found nearly 2000 items that were at the “figure” level of nudity.
Now I’m glad that I waited -- and that I finally joined. Mind you, it’s usually the same women who do get fully naked and fun with it: Angel Dark, Elen (the blond Russian with the devilish smirk), Eve Angel, Jana D (Jamie J), Lola, Lucy Stratilova, Misa/Michaela Kaplanova, Mili Jay, Zuzana (Deny Moore), ETC. Considering the volume here, it’s been a bona fide candy store for yours truly (or “drooly,” I suppose).
Special mention goes to “Tammy” (aka Vendula). She’s the BEST.
The “Only” sites are photo sites, and the photos are DAMN good. If most models on this network showed off their asses the way Misa does, I’d be totally hooked! It would have EVERYTHING: great outfits, great stripping, and satisfying full nudity in excellent quality.
But they’d rather specialize at putting foreplay at the forefront, and this they do very well. I found myself grabbing “stripping only” sets of a few girls for whom I have “nude onlys” to combine them with. Kind of like “FemJoy and OnlyTease – together at last!” ;)
Here are some stats on the “Only” network sites: OnlyTease: started July 2002. Around Nov. 2007, began occasional 3000 px photos, which became standard in March 2008. 3 updates per day! OnlyOpaques (dark hose): started Aug. 2006; 3000 px photos most of the time from July 2007; 1 update per day OnlySecretaries: started October 2007, with 3000 px photos from the start; 1 update per day OnlySilkAndSatin: started Nov. 2008, with 3000 px photos from the start; 1 update per day OnlyCarla: started Sept. 2005, stopped in April 2009 (lots of photosets, all it of tease-stripping) OnlyMelanie: started April 2005, stopped in Feb. 2009 (same as with Carla, but REALLY cute!)
Finally, a little more about those FastTracks. One can be obtained by recommending three sites (not previously listed) that a model is on. (Must be used by the end of the current month.)
NB: You can view the thumbs of a set before deciding to FastTrack it.
I got a few that way, thanks to my application of library and information science, Lucy Lee, Tereza Ilova, etc. in the subject index.
But remember, it’s best not to join at the beginning of a month since you get 10 for free each calendar month. That’s a nice touch!
BUT be sure to download your FastTracked stuff right away, because access to it expires at the end of the month!
You can also buy 10 “Permanent FastTracks” for $9.95. These don’t expire as long as you stay a member, but they can only be used on the site you buy them on.
AND redeeming them on the site is a hassle: find the page before the billing page, click to redeem, get authorization code ... sheesh!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Entirely exclusive british softcore "porn" - but with masturbation.
A pretty rare mix of wellknown uk-models and totally amateurs.
Dirty talk in most videos - with british accents, of course.
Ok amount of videos - right now it's: 379
The newer videos and photosets are what most PUs will consider: Fine/ok - even crisp
For Michelle Thorne-fans this is just a great site - she has a LOT of videos and photosets.
One fine bonus-site: Pantyhosed4u.com
One other bonus site - not worth anything.
Old time lingerie - if you like that.
Cons:
The navigation here is almost a bummer - even if there is a search-machine and a model base.
But no way to search for "only videos" or "only photosets.
Price a bit high.
Updates come only once a week - BUT it now includes both videos and photosets.
Too many of the better looking girls have only photosets.
Very broad variation i model-quality/goodlooking - too many on the ordinary site.
A bit slow download.
Only solo stuff (apart from ONE video with bj) - well, only found one after browsing for weeks.
Bottom Line:
Joined the site because I found some stuff from it with Michelle Thorn and Linda Leigh - great britts - and both damn sexy.
The style here is - like the name indicates: Vintage.
That means that the models are all in lingerie from the 50's, 60's and 70's - and some is really outstanding.
The videos are now up to almost 380 - BUT it's only half of that amout that count to something - in viewing quality.
The newer videos are: 1024x760 - older ones goes down to: 640x480 and even 320x240.
All in WMV only.
The photosets are the same. New ones: 1600x1071 - older ones: not worth it.
But the main deal - apart from the outfit (lingerie) is the style in the videos. They are just dirty - for the solo kinds.
Most models does a fine dirty-talk - in a natural way - and in a way I ALMOST never see in US- solovideos.
If it was not for this dirty-talk, my score here would be quite a bit lower.
But listening to Michelle Thorne or even one video with Lucy Zara telling how horny she is and want to get fucked is worth it all.
Alas there are a little too many of the models that looks quite ordinary (not GOOD looking) - BUT still: even some of these girls end up being very sexy in their performance.
And the fact that they only have photosets of Linda leigh and Misty McCain is a bummer - so even if I'm probably not comming back - I can recommend a months membership - AND it looks like the site is growing - and new models are comming in, so who knows - maybe I'll try it again in six months or a year or so...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
# Only Opaques is hot: a sister site of OT; now they have my money also going to them.
# photosets and models are hot; and have me looking at their sets two hours at a time.
#beautiful models that are on the full figured side and less on the skinny side
#top three softcore picture site that I've been a member of this year- I love these photosets
#not too softcore; Only Tease sister site; i joined this site because i was so taken by Only Tease.
# foot fetish, stocking fetish; boot fetish; foot worship
# updates one photoset a day
# some recent select videos are shot in HD quality
#you can earn fast tracks easily; and see future updates in advance- have not seen this anywhere else
# $19.95 for 30 days- very nice deal for softcore
#Hi rez photos are hi quality in all sizes: 711 x 1066, 1365 x 2048; 2000 x 3000
# forums to give opinions; interact with models
# one of the best collection of models I've seen- top five sites for overall quality of models- they are beautiful
Cons:
# get about 8-9 videos per month; secondary to photosets
# Hd quality is not the super HD variety; and is only applied to select shoots.
# site is not huge- been shooting since August 2006
# this site is not for those who only want to see models naked though there are a few exceptions but for the most part- no.
Bottom Line:
Only Opaques is a great site for softcore lovers who lean towards pictures; and who love full figured models in tights; and in both silky and cotton panties. I also like to see beautiful women in pretty dresses; cute pumps; and cute outfits and you get a lot of that as well as well as close ups of boots; shoes; lovely busts toes and feet.
I found out about Only Opaques because I was a member of Only Tease first- and this is one of their sister sites. For one, the selection of models is great- I dont pass over models like I do other sites. I love their clothes; pretty dresses, the way they pose. Its a site for those who enjoy the way a womans body looks like in clothes; lingerie; garter belts; socks.
I'd recommend this site as a starter site for the whole series of OT sites- for under $20.
If you have read my past reviews- you'd see that i have seen a lot of hardcore; Yes, the softcore that Only Opaques offer is hot enough. and enjoyed this as much as hardcore.
Its the same shoot style as OT. But specializes in hosiery. Lots of super close ups of rear ends; big lovely bras; toes encased in silky hosiery; lovely garter belts and tights in your face; snug panties over volutuous bums; boots in your face; lovely tight skirts over vloutuous bums; nice portrait shots; tight opaque tights stretched over silk and cotton panties; some topless shoots; open leg shots in hosiery; bent over- round rear end in face shots and beautiful models.
I respect Only Opaques. The beauty of their models took my breath away and now have taken my money!!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots and lots of great looking girls, simply spoilt for choice.
Mega sexy outfits, these girls are very well dressed.
Shed loads of content, thousands of photosets and in choice of sizes too.
Good value for money (for a month, maybe not on an ongoing basis).
Easy to navigate and find what you want.
Cons:
Many of the videos are a bit naff.
The photos although good big size, can be blurry a lot of the time.
For a British site there seem to be too many non-british girls here.
Bottom Line:
Wasn't sure if this site was going to do it for me what with it being very soft core, but I was very pleasantly surprised. I do like my British girl sites and this one is up there as the best of them when it comes to the quality of the girls, there is babe after babe after babe, there really is a glut of great looking girls here and more often than not they are well presented in sexy feminine outfits. My only complaint with the girls is that there seems to be rather a lot of non-british girls which isn't necessarily a problem but when you consider this is supposed to be a british girl site you do feel just slightly cheated, they are however gorgeous so maybe I'm just being picky.
The photosets are great with a choice of sizes and very big pictures, but there's a lot of blurry pictures and not sure why this is, is it the compression or the standard of photography I'm not expert enough to know. The sets can be very repetitive and boring when they needn't be, it's like you get photosets with well over 100 photos and so many shots for a set where the girl is only getting topless or mild nude means a lot of very samey shots, it's almost as if they they are doing all they can to go for quantity over quality at times, several shots of the same pose for every pose just to bump up the figures and boast how many images the site offers.
One thing that gets right up my nose, is the fact they deceive and rate a set as nude when infact the model doesn't get nude, maybe that's intentional as part of the whole 'tease' thing but I'm not convinced, if they don't get nude then don't call it nude as it's misleading.
The videos are ok, but for a site of this size and standing I must admit to expecting better. I surprisingly prefer getting off to these great looking sexily dressed girls teasing and stripping slowly more so than the usual rude straight to it porn, but the general picture quality is lacking somewhat for a site as big as this.
Anyway am running out of characters so better sum up and say that this site is one of the best I've seen despite it's few negative points, it is well well worth a months subscription to as you get lots for your money and the girls are awesome, but although there appears to be plentiful updates I'm not sure they would justify a permanent recurring sub (that's not me anyway unless I win the lotto). You won't regret joining this site, so if you haven't already then go do it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- as of today: pics come in 2000x 1331 or 1331x2000.
- Videos: Good looking 1280x720 4162kbps Wmv. Downloads in: Dvix; mpg; quicktime, and Wmv in hi resolution -as stated above- and in a nice 852x480 2000kbps. New videos weigh around 500-800 mb's.
- Due to their camerawork we get to watch female legs in rather pleasing perspectives, thus, enhancing their appeal.
-boy vs girls scenes of: Aneta keys with his boyfriend, i believe, a rather ugly guy, this one comes in 704x396 2500kbps ; Sophie Moon, this one comes in 704x528 2650kbps, what a treat is to watch this women in a b/g scene!
-The girls are not loud and are very skilled teasers. male talen't don't batter the women.
- Very good customer support, although they could even reply faster to e-mails.
- Vids of stunning women such as: Zuzana Drabinova; Veronica De Souza, two of them riveting on account of being recent, and therefore looking great; Ines Cudna, Verona aka veronica fasterova; Susana Spears; Maya, LEA TYRON, GOOGLE HER!
Cons:
-Disgusting regional pricing. They apply double standards when it comes to billing their members. i took that into account when i scored the site.
- Videos prior to 2007 don't look good.
-Pictures and videos watermarked.
- Some of the models look downright bored. i assume that the notion of men aroused watching them rubbing their feet bores them stiff.
- they should revamp the quality of their older videos since the models are amazing.
-Downloads didn't come fast for me.
Bottom Line:
- if you're a leg man or you like good looking women you can't miss this site. Barring their freaking regional-pricing practices the site is next to perfect.
-You can add to the above list of stunning models: Monica Sweetheart; Merylin Sekova; Silvia saint (three episodes); Simony Diamond in boy/girl scenes; Regina Ice; Peaches, Kathia Nobili and the list goes on.
-i'd like to add that there are a ton of girl/girl scenes.
- you can stream the vids.
- this is a pro i couldn't add above: to the best of my knowledge, there are no DL limits and i belive that you can use a DL manager if you so choose.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
amazing pictures
amazing models
nice site layout
updated daily
and amazing models again, lol because they are so sexy
Cons:
bad videos
needs to be a bit more sexual, ie more nude instead of mainly tease and topless
Bottom Line:
onlytease is an amazing site with possibly the best pictures around but what really lets this site down is the movies, the lighting is poor and does not match the pictures whatsoever, also once the video is better it would be great to see more video updates like the same amount of picture updates.
The girls are amazing but the site needs to push past the PG a little bit more than it is. This is a site I join once every 2-3 months, sometimes a little longer
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM or other download restrictions.
-Combination of two niches I like, Asian women and pantyhose. Not exclusively Asians though.
-Updates almost every day going back to 8/1/2008.
-Photos are 1200x780 and decent crispness.
-297 photo sets. Each has 50 to 70 photos.
Cons:
-105 videos. The quality is completely unacceptable at 320x240 for nearly every video. A few are 720x480, but with a bitrate of 327.
-Most videos have only one option-WMV. Some are only Realtime.
-No whole video downloads, only clips.
-No streaming options.
-Photos cannot be zipdownloaded.
Bottom Line:
Even without high expectations, the site was a disappointment. Since I am much more into videos than photos, I consider the site to be a disaster. I basically agree with the review by Cucuta, but I feel that it is incomplete regarding some aspects that I very much care about.
The videos are a complete waste of time as well as hard drive space. The quality is as weak (320x240 and grainy) as you can find anywhere, even on amateur sites. The camerawork is invariably poor, missing that quality of eroticism that they should be aiming for. Many of the videos and photosets are overexposed, or have poor coloring, even oversaturation. For a site with many attractive models, this is simply incredible.
The photos are ok and the quantity is good for a niche site. They are softcore, glamour type sets that tease and sometimes are a little more explicit.
The site was first listed on TBP in June 2005, but the oldest material is from 8/2008. There is some older "guest" photo sets from 2004 to 2006. They are promos for other sites, so they are definitely not exclusive. What happened from 2006 to 2008?
After downloading a few videos and a peek at the photos, I complained to the site about the lack of quality. Days later, I have no response, no offer of a refund, only silence. In the email I got from the site after signing up, I was assured of a one hour response time to customer emails. Not recommended for video lovers, and only a weak maybe for those interested in glamour photos.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Mix of asian and non asian models in pantyhose and lingerie
- A terrific, albeit small sight that really 'gets' the slow striptease.
-Also a small collection of videos, mostly of slow stripping.
- Clothing and posing are the strong suites of this sight. The women pose erotically IN THEIR CLOTHES - than continue through each phase of undress -
- Host AkirsLane is very friendly. There is also a forum with free previews.
-Also includes some mild bondage pics.
- Each model has from one to a max of about five photo sets. Each set has about 50-75 picutres.
- Good mix of models and body types with light and dark asians, and cute American girls. Also some more mature women.
-Akira Lane, a voluptuous Asian women with nice round hips is featured in dozens of photo sets and
videos herself.
Only 21.95
Cons:
-Quantity is pretty limited with only about 100 or so models, about half of which are asian.
- This is a softcore sight. Some masterbation, but no sex shots
- Most of the clothing is sexy but some may find some of the sets cheesy. For instance, Akira dressed like a stewardess.
No bonus or additional content
Bottom Line:
I made it through the first 45 years of my life without ever craving Asian girls, however on a trip to Las Vegas one year I noticed a bunch of sexy well dressed Asian girls and came back with "yellow fever". As I explored Asian porn sights I found most were pretty hard core.
This off the beaten path sight is one of the few that I have joined more than once. I like it as it takes beautiful asian women, dresses them in classy clothing and slowly strips them. On the way there are a generous number of pantyhose and sexy undergarment shots.
There is a decent amount of content, I counted 120 models, but not enough to last more than a week or so for a hungry downloader.
The videos are similar to the photos with slow striptease being the forte.
Some of the most beautiful asian ladies are to be found here. Both lighter skin Japaneese typss and darker skinned south Asians, Hawaiins etc. Some models may be familiar to those who frequent Asian sights -Mika Tan, Sanny Aung etc.
Of the non Asians, some are familiar faces like Kordelia Devonshire, and there is a good mix of different types here also.
If you like pantyhose and Asians and are seeking a sight that delivers in a very understated erotic way, I highly recommend it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A good sized archive of pictures. Probably 400-700 models
- A large variety of model types from every category (young/old, vanilla/ethinic, skinny/voluptous etc.
- picture sets are sorted by either model or by "specialty sets" including peeping Tom, Socks, Panty pudding, undercurrent, hose beast etc.
- There is a real paper and ink magazine (remember those) that goes with the site and you can also navigate that way.
- Models go from good to excellent
- Content also has a large variety including sets featuring generic stripping, toys, and boy/girl, girl/girl scenerios.
- There are sets with slow peeling of clothes and many photos in various stages of undress.
- Well maintained site - includes forum, frequent updates, what's new, etc.
Videos are presented by model or directly in video window. There are both short and long videos and most can be either downloaded or viewed streaming.
- Got in on the 19.95 special
-Picutres are avaiable in medium or large size (800 vs 1600)
Cons:
- Picture quality was not always up to current standards. Many pictures are small and washed out looking.
- Also many pictures look highly air brushed. Others have white clothes on white background which lose definition.
- Many models have only a single 20 picture photo set. Others have only a single 60 picture photo set. Very few have more than one or two photo sets, so when you find a model you really like you don't have the quantity of her to go after.
-Pictures appear out of sequence. The girl many strip down and the next ten photos have her with here clothes on again.
- I am not sure what a leg fetish sight is. I was looking for a little harder edged version of the "only tease" type sights/
Bottom Line:
I am not sure what a leg fetish sight is. I was looking for a little harder edged version of the "only tease" type sights and came away a bit disappointed. I am a photo guy not a video guy and about half the pictures are too old and washed out to be useful. The most recent content is much better and there are about 5 or 6 models that hit it right on the nail - Extravagant lingerie or tight clothing, slow stripping, nice posing in clothes and out.
My bottom line is I think in this age of specialization, this sight is too broad based. Are they a lingerie/glamour sight? Are they a foot fetish sight? (What is a leg fetish anyway)
Are they a standard photo sight? Are they a pantyhose sight?
I don't want to trash LEGSEX because I got some really good photos out of it - just not enough.
For example I am just about done with my membership and I have downloaded 403 pictures from LEGSEX. I went to my Only Tease directory and the total from there was 1,919.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Exclusive content.
Large amount of great and average looking british models.
Fine updates - daily. Either photosets or videos - MOSTLY photosets.
Good mix in styles of different outfits - well, this is a SOFTCORE FETISH-KIND of site.
Zip for photosets.
Photos in ok quality/size.
Ok navigation and layout.
Fair/average price-level.
Cons:
NOT 2009 kind of videos.
Generally low/average video-quality.
Too few videos compared to photosets.
Very softcore - but ok, you can see that from the previews - that's the style of this site.
Marketing-promiss of HD-videos do NOT stick.
Some scenes are a bit stereotype - with re-use of same outfits too many times.
Some models do not even go topless.
Too many videos are photo-shoot-style.
Anoying password repeat when you download.
Bottom Line:
This site sure does a lot for marketing the product.
Wish they'd do the same for the videos and especially the quality os those videos.
At the latest PR-mail I got in March, they claimed:
"Now HD-videos".
Empty words!
Because the new videos are no more viewing-HD or even in bigger file-size or bottomline NOWHERE near HD. BTW the size of those newer files are the same as it's been for the last couple of years.
For a major 2009-site their videos sucks - I normally do not use words like that in a review - but with this site: it's the case.
It's a pity with the whole video-deal at Only Tease, because the concept is/could be very good.
Those videos:
Average file-size: 50-60 Mb.
640x480 (that ought to say it).
Only avi.
But ok, apart from the frustrations about videos in 2009 at this site, the photosets are way better.
Three sizes of zip-download: Standard, Extra and Ultra. From aproxx. 10 Mb over 35 Mb and up to 100 Mb (2048x1056).
And even the standard photo-sizes are ok.
NB: When writing this review and scanning the site again, I now see ONE new video placed today (17th of april 2009) where the size suddenly is more like it: 285 MB - and NOW: wmv. Cheers! - ONE out of 1500.
The video is with one Ashley Massey and the viewing-quality is decent - not more. (and this one is quite boring).
But, ok - if Only Tease - finally - does videos this quality, I'd sneak my score up to 80 - next time. If I ever be back after 3-4 terms - doubt it, though.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ 3 day full access trial for $6 through TBP
+ Full access to 8 other sites (Swankpass network)
+ 960 photo shoots and 343 vids
+ Zip download available
+ No download limits or DRM
+ Smallish watermarks
Cons:
- Search function doesn't work & no model directory
- Pic sizes max out at 1020 x 680
- Vids max out at 640 x 480
- About 50% of vids downloadable in clips only
- Mostly nonexclusive contact
- Updates about once a week
Bottom Line:
For the price I figured this one was worth a trial. I figured it wouldn't be HotlegsandFeet but I was still hopeful of getting some decent leg shots. As they say "hope springs eternal" ... and this site is just another mediocre pit stop on that long eternal road.
Legaction started as a magazine (the other 8 network sites are also mag oriented). These sites never seem to have their act together enough put out a quality web based product and this one is no different.
Most of this stuff is nonexlusive as they farmed out a lot of the photography. For the hardcore stuff, most of this comes from Deny DiFranco (DDF) so if you've been to his sites recently skip this place. The rest of the hc is stuff you've probably already seen on other mega sites. The solo material has more stuff I haven't seen before but I can't vouch for exclusivity.
The girls here range from known pornstars to amateurs to milfs. The quality of the sets/scenes varies greatly from poor to good.
Pictures: As I said, pics max out at 1020 x 680. The photo archieves date back to 1997 but the sets prior to 2006 are crap. You get about 8 - 16 shots per set there (aka: worthless). The newer stuff spreads out to about 60 to 250 shots. Unfotunately, most of the good stuff (aka newer) is also the stuff you've probably seen already. The quality is average (nothing HQ about it). Most of the pics are solo with about 25% being HC and lez.
Video: There is only a couple years worth of video but only half have full length downloads available. The full downloads range from about 20 to 90 minutes. You can download in wmv, ipod or watch in flash. The older clip based stuff is strange in that you get 3 or 4 short clips with the last clip having most of the content and length. Again, you've probably seen a lot of this stuff from the DDF sites and other megasites. Quality is so-so; the full length clips at, say, 40 minutes long only come in at about 250 mb in file size. About half the vids are HC and the rest solo or lez.
The search function looks good but it doesn't work. You can only search under vids or pics and even then the layout is random, not by date. A lot of models, especially in the pics, have only a first name or no name at all or a "wrong" name so good luck there. There is a model directory.
As a bonus you get a slew of crappy 3rd party streaming feeds that I thought went extinct years ago (thus providing proof of "nonintelligent design" at this site): When's the last time you've seen a streaming vids options at 56k, 128k or 250k? The 8 other network sites are similar to here but have their own content and niches.
As another mild downer, when I ran my card the confirmation page didn't appear. Thus, I had to venture to my email to confirm everything.
Basically, for you leg lovers this site is more like a hamhock then a beautiful gam. The only reason this one scores in the 70's is because of the volume of content and network availability.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ $8, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ No DRM
+ Mostly exclusive content
+ Mostly attractive shaved Eastern Eurpean hotties in stockings
+ 296 photo sets of about 100 pics each with no watermarks
Cons:
- Update schedule irregular (3+ months since the last update at the time I joined)
- Photo quality a bit grainy
- No zips on photo sets
- No search function and no model info
- Only 46 vids of mediocre quality
- Some cross marketing for their other sites
Bottom Line:
No way to sum this one up other than your standard eastern european goulash. The site caters to the 18-23 hotties who parade around in their stockings. The offerings are pretty softcore.
Pictures: This is basically a pic site. All pics come in at 1200 by 800 with "nyet" zips. I counted about 15 h/c sets, a couple of lez and the rest were solo with only about 30 playing with toys out of the 296. I was a little miffed because a lot of the pics appeared a bit grainy to me. Part of this is because I'm thinking these are old sets and some may be scanned. I recognized some of the sets (it's mostly exclusive from what I can tell) and they date back to maybe around the year 2000. A few sets were obviously nothing but screen caps. Still the quality was acceptable for the most part.
Videos: You'd have more fun eating undercooked borscht than watching these things. I only downloaded a few but they were grainy, come only in WMV format, and clocked in size-wise at 350x290. They also chew up a lot of space for the quality you get (100 to 500 mb per clip). Most are split scenes, not whole vids. You get about 20 h/c scenes. Most of these scenes do not have picture set equivalents.
The site has an amateurish feel to it. No search, no model info. Just 15 pages of photo sets and 4 pages of vids. There are about 65 models here so most have multiple sets to offer. Most of the girls were cute and I admit that I did download about 50 sets but what a pain given the lack of zips.
This site gets a 73 for iffy quality, irregular updates (we all like to be regular, don't we?), no model info or search function, no zips and lack of quantity and quality of video. What saves it from dipping below the Mendoza Line of 70 is the quanity of decent looking babes.
It costs you $8 for a 3 day trial. Don't worry, you'll be done in a day if you decide to go. Don't bother going back.
I will note that when you cancel (billing through ccbill) you get an offer to continue at $15 a month. If you join up you'll also get access to 10 other sites that the webmasters own. Assuming what they have to offer on those sites is like here, I obviously opted to save a few bucks. Somebody needs to call the Kremlin and tell that the USSR is kaput and they need to get with the times.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A site that is reasonably true to its niche.
Mostly mature amateur models.
Picture and Video quality, while not outstanding, is reasonable. New videos are 640x480 at 1000 bitrate.
Picture sets are zipped, however ... see below.
Cons:
The more I look and download the more I realize that the site is actually nothing but a tease to encourage you to purchase their DVDs. at a steep price in my opinion. I saw one that sold for 35 British Pounds.
Video segments are poorly organized and it takes a lot of searching to find part one or part two of a series. Once all the parts are found it usually amounts to no more than a ten - fifteen minute excerpt of a Video that has no beginning or end for the above mentioned reasons.
Most picture sets are duplicates of the incomplete videos and can be downloaded zipped but beware, most sets are small and still require multiple zips .. one per page of pictures.
Bottom Line:
I must confess to having mixed feelings about this site. On the one hand it is refreshing to see mature women in old-fashioned underwear, something very appealing to someone over fifty, well, appealing to me, anyway and I'm enjoying the "teases", as frustrating as they are in their incompleteness.
On the other hand, however, I have seen some of the models on other mature sites and, most importantly, I really don't like having spent a subscription fee just to be used by a site shilling their products.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ZIP downloads of both 800 and 1600px versions of the galleries offered
+A lot of models
+Star directory with headshots
+There is a model search but it is only accessed on the model directory page
+They have all the picture sets categorized by model, yes, but they also categorize them by magazine issue, going all the way back to their 2001 series.
+Good mix of American and Non-American models
+All updates are archived back to 2004, retaining their addition date (however that date is not displayed on the actual page for the update)
+A little fun addition - feet around the office. A few feet pics every couple of days. This is a leg/feet site.
+Downloads work with download managers
Cons:
-A good portion of the galleries are small...very small
-All images watermarked
-All videos watermarked
-Because LegSex has been around for a while (in magazine form, not so much for the website) they feature girls before their prime, and as such the girls use very old aliases (or other unknown ones). Maxxx=Brooke Stone, Scotti Andrews=Clare, Sheila Rossi=Tina.
-Most models are one-and-done, meaning only one update.
-They have movies, but they are so hard to find. You click the section titled "Move it!". Nope, its not called "videos" or "movies"..."Move it!"
-Downloads have generic file names (scene.wmv, 1600.zip)
-Videos offered only in WMV
-Solo content outnumbers hardcore content by a wide margin
-Update schedule stinks...2-3 updates per week, most are just image updates, not many video updates
-The tour page looks better than the actual members page.
Bottom Line:
Just another porn site...put it that way. Not enough is offered to put it in the same league as DDF Productions' HotLegsAndFeet.
There are some old models on here who I certainly like and were looking for (Sheila aka Tina, Brooke aka Maxxx, Scotti aka Clare, etc.) but the site does not offer much OF THEM. It is one gallery here, one gallery there...and all the galleries are 20 pictures, standard. I think the pictorals are more, but there aren't many pictorals...most galleries are just the pics which were featured in their magazine, in other words, 20 pictures :P.
It says a lot when the TOUR page looks better than the MEMBERS page. The TOUR model directory looks so much better than the MEMBERS model directory.
It also is a pain in the neck that everything is so hard to find. I spend quite some time looking for the movies, briefly going so far as just assuming there were none. Everything is not named properly...Videos section is called "Move it", pictorals are called "Pic-toe-rals". Quit the fancy and just stick with what works.
If you want a Legs and Feet site, stick with HotLegsAndFeet from DDF Productions...its a hell of a lot better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill.
-No DRM, download restrictions or other unnecessary problems.
-Download managers supported.
-Part of network with 8 sites with unusual focuses.
-Attractive girls for the most part. Not the usual pornstars either. Spanish or Portuguese girls.
-Nice quality videos. Neither my computer or the website provides any details.
Cons:
-Site appears to be without a focus. The girls don't always start with baby dolls. With so few videos, I expect them to stay within the niche.
-Only 13 movies and no photo sets at all. Needs serious growth.
-Only four download options. Ipod, low mpeg, high mpeg and flash.
-Ordinary sex.
Bottom Line:
The name of the site is very misleading, as it is not a clothing fetish site in the way it is presented. The baby dolls are not the focus, in fact the action starts without any clothing teasing at all. It struck me as just an ordinary gonzo site, but with better quality videos. The other clothing sites in the network were much hotter, better presented and unusual if not unique. I could see jeans, or miniskirts as a clothing fetish, and baby dolls should work as well. A disappointment compared to those, but otherwise an ok site that is just too small. Thirteen videos is not much by anyone's standards.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Epoch.
-Fairly attractive girls for the most part. All have nice legs, a necessity for a leg site.
-Inexpensive trial option.
-Access to 12 other sites. Mostly they are very small and not very interesting though.
-No DRM or other download restrictions.
-Updates weekly.
Cons:
-Not enough teasing for a site of this genre. Nearly every video has a dildo being used about halfway through it.
-No BG or GG. I thought this would be a plus, but all you get is the same old, same old masturbation without any enthusiasm. Dull.
-Could use a little variety in age, body shape.
and ethnicity. Only one model is not white, for example.
-Could use a search engine. Many models have multiple videos and photo sets.
Bottom Line:
This site surprised me in several ways. The biggest surprise is that without any sex, just masturbation, that they could make a site so lacking in tease and erotic buildup. The main page states: "show off what you like best, long sexy legs." It is not really very good at that. It is occasionally explicit, but I joined for the legs and the costumes. If seeing split open pussy and ass while wearing nylons is your thing, you may like this site more than I did. Lots of sites feature explicit nudity; I could have joined one of them. The next surprise was that I liked the photos (95 sets) better than the videos (40). The photos (1024x682) are zipdownloadable by page, but not for the whole set. The videos are wmv only, 640x480, 2211 kbps and about 10 to 20 minutes each, so there just isn't much quantity at 40 videos. They are not available to stream and only downloadable as whole movie. There are two choices as to quality. I am a video guy and found them very dull and predictable. Typical gonzo style with overly made up pornstars, overacting, stereotypical clothes and poor camerawork. In contrast, the photos include not only sets of screenshots, but also sets with the models wearing a variety of the usual costumes e.g. teacher, secretary, etc. The bottom line here is that I feel there just isn't enough quality or even quantity to keep my interest.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Site is amazing if you love character. When you join the site, you immediately get access to a bonus site, then, after each 7 day period as a member, you get access to another. There are some really bizarre bonus sites that are way not my style, but there are at least 4 or 5 that make this site worthwhile.
Models always have clothing on, and typically panty hoes. There is an appearance of role playing, but it's in another language, so who knows what they're saying.
Very little vag penetration, almost entirely anal. Definitely a sense of submission in the female models.
If you're looking for something new and want the girls to keep some clothes on, this is a must join.
The male models don't get in the way, nor are they objectionable.
Cons:
The bonus sites are really bizarre. Lots of gay/tranny/girl on guy stuff, but you don't have to add them.
Video quality isn't HD or even crystal clear, but it's decent.
Not many updates, nor a ton of pre-existing content. But again, the stuff that's on there is great.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Full access trial membership.
-Bill through CCBill.
-The newest videos can be downloaded in one file. DVD quality AVI but 640x480.
-306 photo sets. Zipdownloadable 1505x1000. Mostly if not all screenshots.
Cons:
-Not many models, about a dozen. They each have multiple videos and photo sets.
-Most videos on the site, 127 out of 143, are not downloadable as one link and are 320x240.
-Not download manager supported. Very slow downloads.
-The models are not much to look at but most have nice legs. Two models have too skinny, shapeless legs.
-The site is in English, but the actors speak a Slavic language that I don't recognize. Some may see this as a plus as many sites blab too much and this can detract from the eroticism.
-No model information or search engine. There is no way to easily find videos of a particular model, except by scrolling through all the videos on the site. The contents are listed as the site updates.
-There is no update schedule.
-Uninspired sex. I was expecting an emphasis on the leg and nylon aspects, but that seems to be unimportant here. I want legs and great girls, not dull sex while wearing nylons.
Bottom Line:
This site is not better than the usual for the genre; it may even be weaker than the others. I have yet to find a good site with a legs and nylons theme. Even for a trial I was expecting more. The visuals were just not exciting. I was expecting a lot more of great legs in nylons with attractive models, but this site just doesn't deliver that elusive quality that makes a site work. Uninspired sex with plain models, with too many low quality videos that you need to download in parts. Not recommended even as a full access trial.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
This review will repeat at the other OT sites as they are all part of 1 network (I joined for $44.95 per month to all 5).
OnlyTease is a teasing site (Not a porn site - no hardcore, minimal full nudity, light play, softcore content). Most of the models are British. Videos average around 40-70 megs per peice and there will be 1 video per photoshoot. Most if not all photoshoots will be shot in both film and video (posted separately on the site). Videos last 4-6 minutes mostly and are almost always the same - striptease. Sometimes there is music and sometimes talking/teasing.
Photos are well done. Most sets are available via Zip download in 3 different formats - up to very high quality - 50-70meg zip files for 100 photos.
Models - Many beautiful women are available here. Many models will appear on other sites - ie Kate Harrington or Lucy Zara - many will not. For many, you will only find them on the OnlyTease family of sites.
Cons:
Content is generally the same. Do not join the site looking for moaning and groaning etc. This is about all types of hosiery and outfits on sexy girls...doing sexy British girl type things! That's it! Videos could be longer...scenes could be more original!
Bottom Line:
This site has one of my highest ranks because it's f'ing fantastic at what it aims to be.
OnlyTease has the largest collection of this kind of tease on the net. Some of the content is boring...some is just f'ing hot. Women like Emma Harper, Natalia, Natasha Marley, Nikki F, Sophia Smith...there are hundreds of models - they are just so sexy...sometimes this hits the spot.
You will not be disappointed if you have the funds to spare. All of their sites are worth joining.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+High Quality photos
+Great mixture in styles of clothing.
+Updated daily.
+Has a nice catalog style. Makes it easy to search for what you want, rather that be full nude or blonde or etc.
Cons:
-Really softcore. Too many models that don't even get full nude or if they do, they don't give you a good shot of their pussy.
-Videos are pretty much useless. Seem to be nothing more then behind the scenes videos of the photo shoots.
Bottom Line:
I really like OnlyTease and the other Only sites. The one and only huge downside for me was that there were way too many photo sets that were either non nude or only topless. Being a fan of full frontal nudity, it seems 1 outta 5 models/sets would show full frontal nudity. Only Tease does have a option to search for "Full Figure Nude" but the problem with that is, that anytime a model takes off her panties, they label it as full figure nude. Even if they do nothing with the panties down but show ass.
Overall the Only Sites are ones that I'd sign up for once every 6 months for a month. There just isn't enough content to please me to stay a member month after month.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
