Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Art-Lingerie

Art-Lingerie (2)

Active
80
messmer (137) 04-25-11  04:05pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 05-17-11  11:07am  (Update History)
Reason: Since this is primarily a picture site the consistent blurriness (softness) of the HR pictures forces me to downgrade my original score.
Pros: Beautiful models. Some of them very well known and sought after.

Good selection of picture sets and videos.

Pictures come in three different sizes with the biggest ones weighing in at 3000x2000. Typical set is rather small though.

Videos come in two sizes: a smaller one at 640x360p, but very crisp, and an HD one at 1280x720p.

Both sizes are very nice when it comes to clarity of the picture. Videos vary in length. Some can be as short as 3-5 minutes or as long as 11 minutes. There might be longer ones but I haven't come across them. On the other hand, if you have a solo model slowly divesting herself of her lingerie you don't really need a 30 minute video.

Pictures and Videos are downloadable with no restrictions!

Daily Updates alternating between picture and video.
Cons: The naming is horrible. A combination of numbers and letters plus the size you downloaded, that's about it. (eg. 2180-zzD-Ultra.zip) It forces you to stop and rename each and every file when it has finished downloading so that you will remember the name of the model inside the zip.

I am a picture person at heart but was disappointed with the quality of the High Resolution pictures at 3000x2000. They almost reminded me of Twisty's or Only Tease. Too much body make-up, too much air brushing, too much photo shop? Picture became way too soft because of the way it was treated.

It's presented in a size where one should be able to count every pore and hair and fold of garment on a model but in my sample sets I couldn't.

Focus was in the wrong place at times as well. But I guess that's where the "art" comes in.

I had very slow speeds when using DTA and was surprised to find that I was doing better with my ordinary Firefox downloader .. but even then I barely managed more than 500-600KB/s
Bottom Line: A very nice, user friendly site for lovers of erotic lingerie. It has the same basic lay-out as Only Tease and if you've ever been a member of that site you will know that it has to be excellent.

I liked the idea that in some sets and videos the model started out with more than just bra, panties, garter belt and stockings (sadly many of them ARE like that) but would have liked them to finish fully nude.

They don't hide anything, as opposed to OT, but be warned the site is very softcore! Don't expect spreading or masturbation or insertions, you won't find it here.

The models are very appealing to me despite their youth. I guess that touch of fine lingerie helps. Too bad about the pictures, though. I will restrict myself to downloading videos until someone decides to do away with all that powder and sharpens the pictures a bit.

It is my opinion that they built themselves a very nice site here with lots of content considering they are only a couple of years old and I would recommend it to lingerie lovers, if for nothing else than the HD videos that can be found right from their beginning in 2009. I would even recommend it to picture lovers if they don't mind that soft look!

If they renamed their zip files to something more practical like "Eufrat01HR.zip" for instance I would happily give them a higher rating because the models and lingerie are truly stunning, but the present way of naming files is annoying me no end.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Mr Fountain (50) I like Onlyteases photos too...they only ask 24.95.and they deliver good photos. Since you are a sharp/ nude photo lover probably you'd like sites like inthecrack or simonscans. But Sharp usually entails a higher monthly membership price. Simonscans is 29.99 and inthecrack goes for 34.95. You may even like watch4beauty.
04-27-11  01:06pm

Reply To Message

2

messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - Mr Fountain :

Hi Mr. Fountain, in my experience Ultra High Resolution Pictures are usually extremely "sharp" otherwise their size wouldn't make any sense, at least in my eyes. Every single picture site I have belonged to, expensive and cheap, had crystal clear pictures with the exception of Twisty's (they might have improved in the meantime because the webmaster agreed publicly with some of the criticisms) and Only Tease. With the latter I must add "I think" because I didn't keep any pictures. I am going strictly by memory, and mine tends to be not so hot! :-) I was a member of ITC but frankly was more interested in their fabulous videos. Simonscans I have yet to try. Thanks for the tip!
04-27-11  02:35pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.