Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Only All Sites

Only All Sites (0)

Active
75
mbaya (356) 03-21-10  08:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice discount through TBP.
-Huge network of sites with a similar theme.
-No download restrictions. A nice plus considering the sheer quantity that is available.
-Nice photosets with three choices of photo quality, including ultra large.
-Some HD quality videos, but not enough.
-Mostly very attractive models. However, about one third were not. Seem to be classy women that you might see or even know. I didn't see a single boob job.
-Very active member forum that takes requests from members.
Cons: -Glamour type photography. Often the women have too much makeup and seem very stiff. They don't often seem into what they are doing.
-Most videos are not at all erotic. Not much in the way of sensuous movements. Rubbing an arm or a leg is not teasing.
-Many videos and photo sets don't even get to topless.
Bottom Line: The site sells itself as 100% erotic, 100% tease and 100% exclusive. They also say they are about the erotic, not the extreme. In order to be erotic without being explicit, they need to appeal to the members ability to be mentally stimulated. Without explicit photos and videos, the models themselves have to be special in a way that other sites don't often attempt.

Since this is so unusual in pornland, comparisons are difficult, if not impossible. The question to be answered is, do they succeed? Is their goal of being erotic successful?

I was a member of onlytease.com in 2006. I was somewhat disappointed by the lack of heat I saw. However times change and so have my tastes in porn. Since I love nice legs and pantyhose, I felt that maybe I should give the network a try at the newly discounted price.

I found quite quickly that the network is a LOT larger than what I had subscribed to in 2006. The quality of both the videos and the photos has greatly improved. Navigation is easy, but the search function is still inadequate.

Did they reach their goal of being erotic? Yes and no. Yes some of what you see is truly great and I love it a lot. However, the site promises a lot more than it delivers. I thought the tease referred only to the content, but the site itself could be a lot better.

Regarding the outfits, the models all too often wear pants or use opaque pantyhose. I like dresses showcasing great legs that look like legs, in other words sheer pantyhose. I don't much care for cheerleaders or bunnies either.

Overall, problem number one is that nearly all the videos simply do nothing for me. In all fairness photo sites usually have poor videos. What I feel the problem here is that the models don't have much of a feel for teasing. For the most part, European models get into this type of photo and video modeling without first doing any stripping or other live shows. They may be quite beautiful, but don't master the art of sensuous movements. For example, I see a lot of scenes with hands rubbing arms or legs, but very little in the way of quick flashes. I rarely see a glimpse of panties that seems to be an accident or are intended to build up my interest. The strip sequences are usually quite dull and often end without being even topless. A lot of sizzle, but very little steak. There is an active thread in the forum about whether models who will not even do topless should be on the site.

In my opinion,the site is very much hit and miss. You would have to go through a lot of photo sets and videos to find the true gems. If you have the time and energy, you may fall in love with the site. As for me, I am happy to find a few truly enjoyable downloads, but the site is just too much work.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Capn (28) I was a member of OnlyTease a couple of years back and got very frustrated by the lack of full nudity.
Even sets that were billed as full nude often weren't! :0E
At one point I asked that they were flagged more accurately, but received no response.

Striptease I love, but for me, it HAS to go to full nudity.

It sounds like little has changed in that regard. :0(

IIRC I seem to remember seeing another negative fairly recently; the use of CCBills regional pricing 'service.'?

Cap'n. :0E

03-21-10  08:54am

Reply To Message

2

mbaya (356) REPLY TO #1 - Capn :

CCBill still has a regional price. I signed up through Epoch and got the TBP deal price. For the quantity on the network the price is a good deal. Their idea of figure nude is often with nylons and/or garter belt. Lots of photos are profiles. Very few sets are really nude.
03-21-10  09:08am

Reply To Message

3

Capn (28) REPLY TO #2 - mbaya :

Yep, that is pretty much as I expected. :0/

I do appreciate that different folks like different things, but I really would have thought that a so called striptease site would feature a lot more frequent full nudity at the conclusion of the items.

Cap'n. :0(

03-21-10  09:15am

Reply To Message

4

Denner (233) Fine review of this 'old timer' - been a member three or four times in the past years.
And as a videomanic, I have to agree with mbaya - the videos are close to lame - the photosets are much better...
AND BTW: Do not criticize the site for the lack of nudity - it was never the purpose here - this is and has always been a site with 'outfits' and the tease - it's a niche - and I think it's quite clear even in the previews.

03-21-10  09:24am

Reply To Message

5

mbaya (356) REPLY TO #4 - Denner :

I tried very hard to leave out the lack of nudity as a criticism. I think that they did not succeed very well at presenitng the erotic within their own self imposed restrictions.
03-21-10  09:26am

Reply To Message

6

Denner (233) REPLY TO #5 - mbaya :

Mbaya - I think you've made that quite clear - the 'BTW' in my reply was referring to the Capn's replies...
03-21-10  09:28am

Reply To Message

7

Capn (28) REPLY TO #6 - Denner :

A tease is no good without the pay-off!

I made that point a few years back when I was a member.

My main beef with them is when they claim sets to be nude when they are not.

Cap'n. :0)

03-21-10  02:06pm

Reply To Message

8

Denner (233) REPLY TO #7 - Capn :

"A tease is no good without the pay-off!"

A fine line!

And I agree - still in rare cases - maybe like Only Tease and the bonus sites - the tease itself can be a pay-off.

Personally I go for full nudity, too - AND if a site claim that and not live up to it, I'll have a problem with that, for sure....

03-27-10  07:19am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.