Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Ferro Network

Ferro Network (0)

pat362 (373) 12-05-10  09:04am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -CCbill is their CC processor.
-They have a wide variety of sites that target specific fetishes like: anal, mature, shemales, feet, nylon & pantyhose, gays, lesbian and toys.
-They have a pretty impressive library of videos.
I stopped counting at 2000 videos because the content on the other sites did not appeal.
-Some sites offer both videos and photo sets.
-Many of the videos come in a single file but not all of them.(see Cons)
-You can download photosets as a single zip file.
-You can use a download manager(see Cons).
-They rebill at almost half the original cost.
-Some of the videos have little scenarios but it's all in Russian.
Cons: -You have to log in to each site individualy from the main members site everytime you visit that main site. The only redeeming thing is that as long as you go back to the main ferro page and you've log on to a specific site once then you won't have to log in again.
-Once you've logged on to a site then there is no way of going back to the main ferro page except if you use the back button as many times as you did going forward or logging back on to the main screen.
-You can use a download manager but since you can only download about 4 videos at a time then why bother.(I didn't see a difference in speeds either way).
-There is no search option of any kind.
-The updates are not dated so no way of knowing if or when the sites update.
-There is only one video download option.
-Some videos are broken in 3 or more sections.
-The price is way too high for what this network offers.
Bottom Line: -I've been curious about ferro since the moment I heard about the network. The cost always made it a near impossible option for me but since I recently won the top draw then I thought this would be the time.(No you can't use your winning for that but I could buy Christmas gifts with them and that left me some extra cash).

-This network might have been a great find about 8 to 10 yrs ago. All that porn under one roof and such an amazing selection to chose from but this is 2010 and a network that doesn't date their updates, offer better download options, lowering their exorbitant join cost should not exist.

Possibly the best thing about the join price is that it makes it very hard for most porn surfers to join and seeing the content makes me think that's not a bad idea. If they drop their price then more people will be tempted to join this site and franky that would be a bad idea for most customers.

I debated which score to give this network and I stuck with 62 only because there are still quite a few good videos. You'll just have to do some serious research to find.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


messmer (137) Hey, Pat, your 62 is well deserved. I subscribed, not to the network, but to one of their other sites (Lesbians kissing, or some such thing) and was deeply disappointed. The technical quality was there but the videos themselves were in Russian and mostly cookie cutter and therefore extremely boring.

The two bonus sites I got within a short time of subscribing were older - younger themed but were a farce because one could never tell who was the older and who was the younger, sort of defeats the purpose and fantasy of the whole thing. :-) Good review, sorry about your disappointment.

12-05-10  02:25pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (373) REPLY TO #1 - messmer :

I'm easy going when it comes to language because I'd rather hear a Foreign language spoken than nothing at all so the Russian wasn't a problem. There is a lot of content but it's so hard to get and time consumming that it's almost not worth bothering. Once you add the awful navigation then you have a mess of a network.

There's so much work involve in fixing what's wrong with the network that I don't think they'll be able to do it and that's of course if they feel they should. All I hope with this review is that no one else waste their money on this network.

12-05-10  07:17pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #2 - pat362 :

Just a short remark agreeing with you re. language. This is not of major importance to me either, because I too prefer it to deafening silence, so the Russian by itself wasn't half as bothersome as the Russian along with a very predictable story line. I don't think I kept a single video.
12-06-10  08:52am

Reply To Message


pat362 (373) REPLY TO #3 - messmer :

I agree that they won't get accused of coming up with an original scenario. I think that some of the scenarios might have been more interesting if I understood some Russian but not by much. I think I downloaded about 20 to 30 videos but I haven't watched many yet so the jury is still out on whether any make the cut.

The one thing that they have is that I don't recognize most of their models so it's quite possible that most are exclusive to this network. I know that many of them have more than one video and on more than one site.

12-06-10  02:50pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.