Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Only Tease

Only Tease (0)

Active
72
messmer (137) 10-18-10  01:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 10-19-10  10:50am  (Update History)
Reason: This site is starting to seriously annoy me. Today's video update was at an unacceptable 640x480px at 1469 total bitrate. Lousy picture!
Pros: At present 657 models, 913.663 images and 1854 videos according to their tour .. that's a lot.

Mostly beautiful girls. Sexy lingerie and hosiery.

Frequent updates.

Excellent picture quality offered in three different resolutions (largest 2000x3000px).

Zipped downloads.

Easy navigation and elaborate search engine.

Most recent videos are in 720p HD with a bitrate over 10000.
Cons: The most disappointing con: I found a real sexy model with tons of picture sets and videos and her most recent video, published as recently as August 2010, is in 640x480 AVI format (approx 50MB) and of horrible quality.

In general the older videos, and you don't have to go back far, are just terrible. I have watched plenty of videos with the same technical specifications on other sites that were much better in clarity and quality.

Catering to a younger crowd only. There are tons of picture sets featuring thongs and stay ups but very few featuring full back panties or camisoles etc. There is not one mature face in the crowd.

Picture sets in general spend too much time on the fully clothed.
Bottom Line: Quite frankly the eighty I gave this site is for the technical quality of its picture sets and for its elaborate search features.

The high resolution picture sets are great even though most did not appeal to me because they are too "young" for my taste when it comes to lingerie. See above.

I am managing to get my money's worth from the recent HD movies because, even though they might not exactly feature the lingerie I was craving to see, I love the girls and their British accents!

A good tease only site for softcore lovers, especially younger ones who grew up with thongs and stay-ups and pantyhose. For me it is a disappointment. Too bad I really had high hopes!

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (194) I've never joined this site.

What percentage complete nudity (including photos with lingerie that shows all the good bits) is there in the photoshoots? A wild guess is fine by me.

What is the name of your "real sexy model with tons of picture sets and videos"? Or is she part of your private stash?

Also, why would a recently posted video (August 2010) be of such low quality? Is this a file they dug up from their unused historical trash? Most sites that post updates use files that are their average quality or above average quality. Why would a site post a below average quality file, unless it had some historical or collector interest?

Wild guesses on my part, because I have no knowledge of this site, except for its name. :)

But unless there is a significant amount of nudity, I doubt I would be interested in joining. I like softcore, but I still want to see the "good" bits. (Bits is a British term, you understand. LOL.)

Edit01: I just looked up "bits". I want to see everything interesting, not just the cunny.

10-18-10  02:48pm

Reply To Message

2

messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

Hi lk2fireone, I have yet to come across anything that offers any good bits other than breasts. It might be there but I doubt it because I have the feeling the answer is in the word "tease" .. I was prepared for that but expected to get my satisfaction from a lot of slow stripping. Except they didn't strip down to what I was looking forward to. :-)

As to the model's name I must confess I have no idea because the numbering of the files is so awkward. The name is usually listed at the beginning of a video but I deleted the file after only a quick look I was so disgusted! Especially since here was such a nice brunette with tons of picture sets plus a fair number of videos and I figured I had found my treasure trove! It was a shock to see a two months old video of her of such poor quality.

I would say, steer clear. The excitement is in the partial stripping. As I said I have yet to see a complete strip and am probably not meant to on this site!

10-18-10  03:19pm

Reply To Message

3

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #2 - messmer :

Thanks for the quick reply and the helpful information. You told me everything I need. I will give this site a skip, as you suggested.
10-18-10  03:32pm

Reply To Message

4

mbaya (356) REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone :

I did not see anything resembling bits or any real nudity. I felt the teasing was not all that well done either.
10-18-10  07:14pm

Reply To Message

5

Capn (28) I know I have been banging on about this for years, but this site would be sooo much better if they consistently proceeded to full nudity in each set.

They have great outfits & models, and I appreciate that some won't do nude, but there are plenty that would & do.

A tease is no good without the pay off for me.

They have a very shaky definition of nude too, as some of the sets they claim to be nude aren't.

Cap'n. :0/

10-19-10  10:06am

Reply To Message

6

messmer (137) REPLY TO #5 - Capn :

This site is seriously starting to p... me off, Cap'n. I'm on my way to reduce my score even further. See revised review!
10-19-10  10:45am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.