Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Vintage Flash

Vintage Flash (0)

messmer (137) 12-05-10  01:40pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 12-06-10  09:43am  (Update History)
Reason: Score adjusted upward because complaint about slow speeds appears to have been an abberation rather than the rule.
Pros: Great looking British models.

Sexy vintage lingerie. Latest videos and picture sets are of good quality. Videos at present come in at 1280 x 720 px at 5000 kbps. Picture sets are of good quality as well and are available in zipped format.

Content not overwhelming but 470 Picture Sets and 244 Videos (many of the older ones are, of course, of lesser quality) isn't too bad either.

Love British accents.

Additional three bonus sites.
Cons: Site does not allow you to stop and then resume a download.

Not download manager friendly. My trusty DownThemAll gave me the same speed as the regular browser downloader.

Awful, inadequate search engine. I saw one picture on the tour and it was this picture that enticed me to subscribe. Do you think I can find that set? Rhetorical question! I suppose I will before the month is up.

Only one update every five days.

The three bonus sites do not offer a great deal of content.

Access to bonus sites requires a separate sign-in.
Bottom Line: Despite some of the negatives a nice site.

The few videos I downloaded yesterday were great. Lovely vintage lingerie (full size panties, nylons and garter belts, girdles, bras etc.) I am looking forward to downloading quite a bit more of their great videos (at least the newer ones) because just about every one of them looks tempting. The "dirty" talk by the models doesn't hurt either!

The three bonus sites "Pantyhosed4U" (305 photo sets, 138 videos), "VFAcademy" (69 photo sets, 70 videos), and "VintageFlash.Archives" (236 photo sets, 1 video!) are nice to have but aren't big enough, or update often enough, to make subscription to this site worthwhile for more than one month.

I like the mother site (reviewed), it does have its flaws but at least, for once, I don't have to condemn a site out of hand which is refreshing.

Recommended to fans of vintage lingerie and British models.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (14)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Capn (28) I think I to find this site irritating rather than rewarding.
Not fully clothed to full nude, I take it?

Cap'n. :0/

12-05-10  02:37pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - Capn :

And you would be right, Cap'n. At least that's the case with the videos I've looked at so far. There was one that started fully clothed but did not end up in complete nudity. There was another that featured the model in her lingerie already but she, as well, did not take off everything. A couple more videos wait for a detailed inspection on my part.

Mind you, I might come across some sets/videos that would be more to your liking as I go along in my subscription but with the emphasis of this site being on vintage lingerie, I really doubt it.

12-05-10  02:43pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #2 - messmer :

I thought that most likely.

Many thanks for your prompt response, my friend.

Cap'n. :0)

12-05-10  02:59pm

Reply To Message


PnP Media (2)
As owner of this site and the linked in bonus sites, just wanted to make a couple comments.
I. These sites are are hosted in the US, with one of the most respected adult hosts, and very high spec server. Downloads should not be an issue. I will bring this up with my hosting company, but their tests usually show very good results, so I'm frustated as this reviwer was with the reported download speed he suffered.

2. All the three main sites, are nylon/lingerie/heels fetish first of all, and then split into seperate sub niches. Unless you are into nylons, lingerie and 'dressing up' to 'dress down', ie: strip, you will miss the point of my sites. Full nudity, is absolutely NOT the point, and most sets end with masturbation with the model in nylons and heels.

Vintageflash updates every 5 days, the others weekly, all updates on these are a full video and matching image set. 16 nylon fetish sets added a month...plus the Vintageflash archive mini updates, overall around 26 updates/month in total.

3.Dialog is a key to the videos, it's a fantasy site, you have to like a story line, albeit maybe cliched, our members really like this.

4. If members have a problem, (like download speed), I respond via the sites ticket system as promptly as possible, and help and inform them as required.

5.The search is yes, truly awful, I agree. On the sites next rebuild early 2011, it will be 100& what is needed.

Have your say, thats what I want, and we all help things improve where needed..but full nudity? Check the site name.

12-05-10  07:37pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #4 - PnP Media :

Thanks for your reply, PnP media. I know it was addressed to the Cap'n but let me say that I am quite happy with the fact that the models keep something on. I did join the site for the vintage lingerie and not to get sets of nudes. This is one area of disagreement I've always had with my friend. Both of us like a set that teases but he prefers full nudity at the end while I like it if a model keeps her stockings or some other lingerie on, as long as she is nude in the right places. As to the speed, I went back to your site later on in the evening, 11 p.m. Atlantic Time and had great download speeds, anywhere between 1.5 and 2 MB/s but in the afternoon it was truly horrendous. I attempted to download one set three different times and finally gave up.

And I fervently thank you for getting ready to improve the search.

One more thing, could you do me a huge favour and have a look at your tour pages. A sample picture is being offered of a model walking outside, clad in a white/beige very plain garter belt (almost small girdle) and stockings. I want that set but don't know the model name and haven't found her so far. And I love your site. Once you improve the search I'll love it even more!

12-06-10  08:27am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) First, messmer - as I took the risk to recommend the site to you - sorry to hear about that very annoying download situations.
Maybe and maybe not it's got something to do with North America/Canada - do not know. But I never had that problem when a member.

Still I'm glad, that in spite you're somewhat content with the material - I got quite a collection of - what I think - fine vids from the site..

BTW: Oh, yes - we all seems to have that question about full nude in the last part of the vids - but here I think the deal is generally just fine - well, at least I really like my collection - HOPE you will too, amigo!!!!

12-06-10  09:22am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #6 - Denner :

Hi Denner, you did well in recommending this site to me. I enjoy it very much because it gives me exactly the models in vintage lingerie I was looking for. I think yesterday's poor download speed must have been a temporary blip somewhere because last night's speeds were fine. I had assumed it might have been because it was during European "prime time" but if the server is not located in Europe then it must have been a glitch somewhere. I think I will adjust my score upward a bit based on that fact.
12-06-10  09:35am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #7 - messmer :


BTW, messmer - do not know if Michelle Thorne is your cup of tea or not (I think she's got that old-time-dirty about her) - BUT really like that vid: "Perfect Tease" and the/her audio/talk that goes with it. (the quality for this particular vid is not the best, still.......)

12-06-10  10:44am

Reply To Message


PnP Media (2)
REPLY TO #5 - messmer :

I'm glad to see you joined for all the right reasons! ;o)

The search is being changed, and the new version will first appear on the new upgrade of Pantyhosed4u.com in the next couple weeks.

For the set you seek, if you use the free search box, enter flashing or outside and it will appear in the results. Hope that helps, it was a fun set to shoot in the back streets of south London!

You are welcome to contact me, as is any member, via the site ticket system, you will find I respond quickly.

12-06-10  12:22pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #9 - PnP Media :

Thanks for the reply and the tip re. "my" set. I have the feeling we are talking about the same one because it was definitely in a city setting, so off I go looking under flashing. BTW, you may have noticed that in order to be fair I've adjusted the score upward and removed all references to slow speed. Cheers,


P.S. Just came back. Didn't take long at all. It was Jess Wood(s?) (2007).

12-06-10  01:39pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #8 - Denner :

Anything / anyone my pal Denner likes must be good. I'll have a look at Michelle Thorne and see if our tastes are alike in this instance. :-)
12-06-10  01:41pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #4 - PnP Media :

"Unless you are into nylons, lingerie and 'dressing up' to 'dress down', ie: strip, you will miss the point of my sites. Full nudity, is absolutely NOT the point, and most sets end with masturbation with the model in nylons and heels."

I love striptease but.....

That is where the premise falls apart for me.
Proper full nudity is out, with emphasis, but masturbation is in?

Full nudity is a lot softer than masturbation IMO.

Cap'n. :0/

12-08-10  10:34am

Reply To Message


PnP Media (2)
REPLY TO #12 - Capn :

Correct. Full nudity is whatever level the producer wants it to be, there are from tease to torrid out there in that genré...

Vintageflash is for those that want to see women getting off after a nice strip and teasing British dialog, but with some vintage underwear and always the real deal nylons still on. Thats our fetish.

Our site premise is not for you wanting, 'completly naked' women at the end...sorry!

Ditto our pantyhose fetish site and ditto our uniform fetish site.


12-08-10  11:00am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #13 - PnP Media :

If it is that emphatic, 'Nude Photography' really needs taking off the PU description then.

Cap'n. :0/

12-09-10  11:30am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.