Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Jeffrey99 (29)  

Feedback:   All (98)  |   Reviews (18)  |   Comments (14)  |   Replies (66)

Other:   Replies Received (65)  |   Trust Ratings (26)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 66 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes, I have a PS3. However I"m one that has no interest in the whole digital only format. Maybe it's because I have horribly slow internet, so actually downloading a HD movie will take me days. Not to mention all the DRM that is included with purchased movies from places. I have no interest in watching a HD movie on a 19" computer screen when I have a PS3 and a 51" HD TV in the next room over.

However I will admit that due to financial reasons I haven't rented Blu Ray in a while. As of right now I can't see it worth the price increase over a place like RedBox where you can get a regular DVD for $1 a night.

03-20-10  11:04pm

N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

About the most editing I've ever done is joining files together.

I just don't care enough to take the time to edit what parts out of the video that I don't like. Instead what I normally do is fast forward to the part(s) I want.

I've done editing before of video I've captured form TV or 360, so I've got experience doing it. Just feel it's too much of a hassle and time consuming without some nice ($$) software. Using the software I've used, the new video never looks as good as the original.

02-22-10  04:12pm

N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I'm cool with 2-3 mins as long as it's a streamable preview. Due to my POS ISP, I have no interest in downloading a trailer. Takes long enough to download the full movies as is.

10-23-09  07:20pm

N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

I wish I could even sniff 500. LOL I live in a small town with crappy DSL. So, I'm really happy if I'm running in the 120 range bur normally it's between 80-100.

08-22-09  06:36am

N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

It was a tough one between video and picture quality but in the end I went with Picture quality. It seems if sites have great HD qualty vieos, the photos suffer and if they have great qualty photos then the videos suffer. Seems to be hard to find one that has both.

05-28-09  02:10pm

N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

I think I've joined maybe two sites that were not based in the US and with the conversion rate made it $40+.

At this point and time, $30 is the max I'll spend per month and even then it must be a great reviewed site. As typically I stick to the $15-$25 price range.

05-18-09  07:07am

N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

What few sites I've found like that has some of the worst quality I've seen in a while. I'm too much of a high quality fan to even waste my time on streaming video with a quality that looks like it's from the 90's.

03-27-09  04:08am

N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I guess my question is, would it have been considered porn before the interent? And I think most people would say yes.

In uptight America, I would still consider it porn but it's about as soft as you can go. Other countries where nudity is more acceptable, then I don't think it would be.

01-08-09  07:29am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Most of the time, within a week. Unless it's a site that I really dislike or that doesn't update anymore, then I cancel pretty much days, if not hours within singing up.

01-04-09  08:49am

N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

My first is price. Second would be if they use Epoch. The rest don't really bother me, as there are ways around DRM and/or streaming only video.

01-02-09  06:25am

N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

No. Mainly for two reasons. My dsl isn't the fastest out there and it really isn't a realistic option for me to stream hi quality/HD videos.

Most videos I download, I like to skip around or fastly skim through it.

The only way I'd realistically think about doing it, was if it was only $10 or less per month. AS there are always ways around streaming only videos. It's just normally more of a pain in the ass then needed.

12-23-08  08:03am

N/A Reply of sitsat's Poll

My number one has to be dumbass guys talking in the background. I don't mind it too much on some sites like FTV where most of the talking is more of a interview kinda thing. But I hate the cameraman telling the girls exactly what to do.

My 2nd would have to be the camera snapping away. Mainly just because it normally follows a 3,2,1 or the guy telling the model how to pose.

12-16-08  01:01pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm a newb here but is there anyway to tell what a person gave you a positive or negative review for? For example if I post 2-3 reviews in a couple days time, can I tell which of those reviews got me positivea and which of those reviews got me negative?

11-07-08  03:12am

N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

Have to agree the system sucks.

I voted for Barr. We really need a 3rd party. It's completely stupid to only have 2 choices.

11-04-08  04:58am

Visit Alison Angel

Alison Angel
Reply of somedays's Comment

Damn that sucks. Guess nows a good time to sign back up to get all of her content.

11-05-08  12:28pm

Visit All Teen Rev Pass

All Teen Rev Pass
Reply of OneMan's Comment

They also instantly cancel your access to the sites when you cancel. So even though you paid for 30 days, if you cancel 10 days into your month, you lose access instantly. So I agree with OneMan, I'd highly recommend stay away from. They are a disgrace of a company. And on top of it all, the website they list for "Customer Service" responses doesn't exist.

11-04-09  06:32am

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
Reply of turboshaft's Comment

"It involves the model deep throating the cock, and then when the guy is about to shoot his load, he rams his cock down her throat thereby directly depositing his entire load into her stomach."

That quote right there is enough to make me never visit either ALS site again. While I'm not against hardcore per se, the whole ramming or slamming just isn't for me.

03-21-10  06:36am

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
Reply of mr smut's Reply

You might be right, anything above a B might be on ALS Angels. If they'd just merge both sites into one, then it'd probably be alot better. Seems they are just trying to milk people out of money.

12-12-08  06:57am

Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure
Reply of Jack P's Comment

I've always wondered, is it mainly just a BJ site or does he normally fuck every girl? Or does it just depend?

05-12-09  07:13am

Visit Babelicious

Reply of badandy400's Reply

Videos do work fine. And you can use download managers to download both the videos and the zips, it's just that you can't pause/resume or zips. So you'll have to download 3 zips at a time.

01-30-09  04:00pm

Visit Bring Me Your Sister

Bring Me Your Sister
Reply of theswedish's Comment

Are you downloading or streaming? Sounds to me like your streaming the video. If your actually downloading, sounds like the video file is messed up. But either way, I don't see how download speed would affect the quality of the video.

02-25-10  06:51am

Visit Brooke Lee Playmates

Brooke Lee Playmates
Reply of Denner's Reply

You have to have a password to extract the files? That sucks. Guess it's okay as long as your a member but what happens if over time you wanna check them out again, you'll prety much be screwed if you can't remember the password. Guess you could always just always extract the rars and then rezip them with no password but that's a step that shouldn't be needed.

05-07-09  05:12am

Visit Finest Models

Finest Models
Reply of Drooler's Review

Nice review. The whole not being able to save image by image and the low resolution of the images will probably keep me from giving the site a try. Sucks too, as it sounded like one I'd probably like if they fix those two things.

05-09-09  04:40am

Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
Reply of james4096's Comment

I agree 100% with what both of you said. While I love the videos style and quality, the pics and website design/navigation could really use some work. Overall a good site, unfortunately too many flaws in my eyes for $30 a month, $20 maybe but not today for me at $30.

07-26-09  04:08pm

Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
Reply of Denner's Reply

Nice review roseman but I have to disagree with a few points that people are making.

People actually complain about 25 Gb a day limit? Who the hell can seriously hit that? That's pretty much impossible for 99% of people to hit.

As for the updates, do you guys realize he could do what sites like Nubiles does and seperate each gallery into seperate updates. Would that make you happier? He'd be updating the site daily but it'd just be galleries that are included in the big weekly update now.

How it's overrated in quality is beyond me. The videos can't get any better looking at 8000kbps. I'll give you that the pictures could stand to be bigger and the price for a single site is a bit steep these days.

I think FTV is a 85-90 rated site but again, good review Roseman. Nice and full review.

05-01-09  01:00pm

Shown : 1-25 of 66 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.89 seconds.