Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan (1)

Active
86
Jeffrey99 (29) 12-11-08  02:17pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +Helps a charity (The only site I've ever known to do so)
+Great quality images(2592x3888 portrait/3888x2592 for landscape).
+Great quality videos. Had Divx (which my pc wouldn't play smoothly) and 720p MP4 videos.
+Most models are small chested and pretty skinny. Very seldom are any models C cup or bigger.
Cons: -Website must have been one of the first ever built and boy does it show. WAY past due for a upgrade.
-No easy navigation.
-Most vidoes are just behind the scenes of the photo shoots.
Bottom Line: As you can tell by the name of the site, every model is 100% shaved. At first it's pretty cool but then it starts to make every photo set and every model start to look the same. I love the fact that they have alot of smaller chested girls but after a while, they start to feel the same. Could really use some variation.

There are normally 100 or so photos per set. And the photos are great high quality images. The first 3/4 of the set is your normally glam style shoots but the last quarter can get pretty strange. From sticking normal every day items (food, end of a shovel, etc) in the pussy to pissing. Pissing seems to be a pretty big niche on the site, as it seems to happen alot.

The videos are great quality but most are behind the scens of the photo shoots. So you've always got the lovely cameraman talking through out the whole thing. When will these companies learn? Get rid of that shit.

Navigation for the site is complete crap.You've got either updates or all models. No way to search by cup size, hair color or even model name. To find certain model you have to go to the all models page and do a find within IE or Firefox.

For the price ($29.95 1st month/then $24.95) I think the site is past due for a upgrade. While the images are great quality, due to the navigation and the constant talking during videos, unless a your a image fan you'll probably be disappointed. If your a video fan like me, you'll quickly get sick of hearing the dumbass guys talking.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

badandy400 (103) You are dead on with respects to the site's navigation and look. 10 year old kids do better than this site with their Myspace pages! They need to wake up and realize that this will not cut it and it does not do justice to the good content they produce.
12-11-08  04:24pm

Reply To Message

2

mr smut (42) Hi Jeffrey,

are you sure that there's at least one girl with cup size C featured on ALS Scan? I think that B is the maximum because they have ALS Angels for the busty models :-)

Pissing is in fact a big niche. I started a poll on All Over 30 for the most favourite fetish and peeing is #1 even with those that love mature girls!

As for the number of pics per set it's not 100% correct for the new shoots. I'd say that around 200 is a normal number but there's a lot of sets having +300 pics and even some with more than 400 pics for one series.

Thanks for your thoughts on ALS Scan.

Cheers,
Eddie

12-11-08  10:00pm

Reply To Message

3

Drooler (220) REPLY TO #1 - badandy400 :

Whoa! 10-year-olds do better?

Yes! That makes the point. I agree that the navigation at ALS needs improvement, though it used to be worse! At least now you can go to the other parts of the site from within galleries and vids, at least from the newer ones. And they have update archives that go back longer than 1.5 months, which used to be the case.

One thing they should do is just put all of a model's gallery links on the model's page. There, they can indicate whether it's redone stuff or not.

Another thing is the page widths. I happen to like 1024x768, but their gallery thumbs always extend past the right side of the screen, even the most recent stuff.

ALS has always had a problem in making their site too complicated to navigate. It was really much worse than it is now, but they ought to think about taking the next step.

12-12-08  01:54am

Reply To Message

4

Jeffrey99 (29) REPLY TO #2 - mr smut :

You might be right, anything above a B might be on ALS Angels. If they'd just merge both sites into one, then it'd probably be alot better. Seems they are just trying to milk people out of money.
12-12-08  06:57am

Reply To Message

5

mr smut (42) REPLY TO #4 - Jeffrey99 :

I wouldn't say so because both sites are running for many years now and Alex surely has a lot of expenses. Anyhow this was a thought I also had this morning after I've read your review ... why not merge both sites together or give at least long term members like me the chance to get the second site for a few bucks more. I'd be happy to spent some extra $ to be a member of ALS Angels too :-)
12-12-08  09:37am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.