Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : bacardiancoke (22)  

Feedback:   All (35)  |   Reviews (20)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (15)

Other:   Replies Received (17)  |   Trust Ratings (28)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 35 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The trouble with the holiday period, spending time with family.

If you give yourself the present of a site membership, then it sits there doing nothing until you can finally get rid of the people that you didn't want to see in teh first place. *xmas rant*


12-24-11  03:53am

Reply
2
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Jessica Rabbit by a mile.

Of course, my decision may have been influenced a little bit by the POV roleplay feat. Gianna Michaels.


12-22-11  01:21am

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

If the site is specialist in some way (niche, performer etc.) then signing up as a one off is no bad thing.

12-22-11  12:53am

Reply
4
N/A Reply of littlejoe's Poll

Hi res is great, but there has to be something to give.

By that I mean the models. There are models who have hard bodies and figures of a goddess, but in real porn there is a huge cross section of models, from goddess to average.

Natural markings (stretch marks etc) make little difference to anyone in standard def, but give high def with a poor camera operator and you will rapidly find yourself staring at things that you really don't need to see.


04-07-10  06:28am

Reply
5
N/A Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

Though, to be fair, it could have been any number of different reasons.... guess we'll never know what it was that prompted them to choose you.

I get picked on a lot at security, though nearly always in lands foreign to mine. Guess I just have that kind of face......


03-17-10  12:00pm

Reply
6
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

Considering the sheer amount of data and the general ineptitude of my (British) govt to actually keep hold of data without it being misplaced on public transport, I highly doubt it.

There will be intelligence gathering on individuals if they fit a certain criteria to be a person of interest, but in general they couldn't give a bollocks as long as you are paying your taxes.

The people who issue store loyalty cards have more personal information on you than the govt ever will.

AND, we brits really have the edge when it comes to snooping on our own govt, search "secret bases" and see how we identify our own installations!!!!! Try that in the US and you'd never be heard from again.


03-17-10  11:57am

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Duante Amorculo's Poll

Reality shows are essentially voyeurism without actual sex/porn.

Why would I want to watch a show about a Porn* that doesn't involve porn at some point?


11-02-09  02:17am

Reply
8
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I think that the poll is interested, but fatally flawed as the answers don't cover enough of the options.

If the site has a good review, then sure I'll consider it, but for $35 or more p.m. it would have to be more than just reviews that'd do it for me.

Quality of content
Quantity of content
Interactivity

To name but a few of the things that I'd be demanding in return for my hard earned cash


02-21-09  08:10am

Review
9
Visit 5-Guy Cream Pie

5-Guy Cream Pie
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Easy Navigation
- Wide Range of video scenes
- Access to 9 other sites
- Good quality videos
- Good range of models
- Appears to be exclusive content
- No DRM
Cons: - Few pic galleries
- Pic galleries don't have enough "money shot" content, they try to be met art with the model!!!
- Older videos split into 2 parts
- Newer Videos have interviews with all actors
Bottom Line: It is definately a niche area and to an extent well worth an investment.

But, for a professional site the scenes look too amateur. And this isn't in a good way, they just look poorly organised.

As for the interviews, perhaps these could be consigned to another part of the site..... I'm not that bothered about what the women do etc and I couldn't give a shit about what the men are upto!

It has the potential to be a good, if not great site, but they really need to look at how they organise their shoots (positions, better camera operators etc) because until then it will just carry on looking like a student party shot by the geek who's dad gave him a camcorder for Christmas.

01-16-09  02:13am

Replies (0)
Review
10
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30
(1)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good Variety of Content (types etc)
- Good range of models
- Not a one trick pony
- good image and video quality
- No DRM
- No Download Limits
- Images in .zip option
- Newer vids have variety of formats
- Fantastic layout and organisation
Cons: - Some non exclusive content
- The video watermark is appalling
- er............ nope, I'll give up on that one
Bottom Line: If you've read any of my other reviews, you know it takes a lot to impress me. Well, here's a site that has.

The layout and organisation of the site makes it easy to navigate around and find exactly what you are looking for, be it a particular model, situation, type of nipple (I love that!) So, it is a site that is well designed which is always a fantastic place to start.

AS the site has developed over the years it has evolved and is making what appears to be continuous improvements which makes it stand out against some less able competitors.

There is a good range of models (by that I mean age, look etc) and there is a very good range of situations that they are in.

As an Englishman I must find fault, and I have found one. The watermark for the videos is terrible. I agree, mark your property out to prevent piracy, but at least be discreet.

Apart from that, a highly recommended site if you like your women older. Top of its class.

08-05-09  06:07am

Replies (0)
Review
11
Visit Amateur Sex Outdoors

Amateur Sex Outdoors
(0)

70.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - fairly extensive level of content
- good video quality
- easy to navigate
- .zip download pic sets
- good download rate
Cons: - non-exclusive content
- extensive duplication across sister sites
- pic sets are more solo models (perhaps rename amateur exhibitionism outdoors)
- no real effort made in site structure (generic and faceless)
- comes across as Met Art's poor cousin!
Bottom Line: As a niche site it caters fairly well to outdoor sex, if that's your thing.

Nearly all vids are hardcore action, and of a good quality. But the content is not exclusive, and this fast becomes apparant if you have had memberships to other sites.

The webmasters also copy and at times recycle content to make things appear fresh, which is pretty insulting.

All in all, not bad, but certainly nothing special.

07-08-08  01:20am

Replies (0)
Review
12
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Well planned, well executed site
- Good, logical, easy navigation
- Always high standard of content
- Good value for money
- Regular updates
Cons: - File sizes for pics / vids
- Stop bothering us with x sales...
- Some sub sites stopped updating. Why?
Bottom Line: Welcome to the infamous BangBros, a male driven hedonistic landscape where the men are purile, and the women are hot.

What comes of this coupling is mainstream, but still unique and consistently high quality content.

Whether you want to fill your boots with the Boys of Bang Bus picking up hot girls to fuck around town (literally) to watching some well known faces taking hot creampies, this is your testosterone powered wank material....

There are a couple of things to pick at:

The picture zip files are huge! (the same size as the videos in some cases.) Why not offer us a stripped down version instead? I mean, when you're looking at pics on a mobile device, why do we need something ~4000 pixels in size?

Some of the sites have stopped updating. These tend to be the more niche sites or behind the scenes efforts. That's a pity, as (behind the scenes esp.) is a simple and effective tool that keeps viewers interested, and would certainly keep my subscription for longer.

The bottom line: One of the market leaders, and rightly so.

12-22-11  01:10am

Replies (1)
Review
13
Visit British Doggers

British Doggers
(0)

55.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Features outdoor activities.
Cons: - Non exclusive content
- "British" is inaccurate in nearly all sets.
- It isn't actually about dogging!!!!
- I don't expect a site to which I am giving money to have ads!
- They are recycling their own content from 4 years ago.
- Poor pic and vid quality.
- Appaling site layout and navigation.
Bottom Line: Before now I have been able to offer a fairly balanced view of porn sites and have points of merit as well as critique. With British Doggers though, disappointed doesn't even begin to describe my experience.

So, I'll start with the positives. It is a site that features outdoor activities of others.

Previously being a member of this site, I decided to pay it a re-visit to see what the modern content looks like.

And......... it's exactly the same content that I saw 4 years ago recycled.

It is not actually about dogging (I would recommend that the site creators take a look at just what dogging is, or look to Killergram for tips.)

It is recycling content from the turn of the century (and some looks like it is from before.)

The bottom line - it is the first site that I have ever subscribed to where I have cancelled my subscription on the same evening.

This content was fresh in 2004 - maybe it is time that British Doggers closed its doors for good?

If you are looking for dogging in the meantime then I'd recommend that you look elsewhere, you won't find it here.

02-17-09  07:19am

Replies (0)
Review
14
Visit ChickPass Amateurs

ChickPass Amateurs
(0)

68.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Huge Collection of material
- Proper amateur work, very natural with no visible known porn stars
- good download speeds
Cons: - Very poor navigation
- Search facility is more basic than a Jungle toilet
- inconsistent material
- Can't decide if the site is value for money or not
- Updates are nothing to write home about
- X Sales. Sign of a con artist, not a good way of building my trust!
Bottom Line: If you are looking for amateur (sometimes user submitted porn) then this is certainly a place to entertain for one subscription period.

It is generally passable and for those who like their amateurs then it will keep you entertained for a while.

I won't go into individual "stars" due to the way that the portal is structured and will instead take an overall view of presentation and content.

Presentation

I grow tired of portals and sites that are stuck firmly in their "pre-2005" type design and layout. It is lazy and insulting to those of us who pay good money to use your sites. PLEASE will you start modernising!

Design - poor and confusing. They appear to have tried to make it simple and have instead left it with a bizarre structure that is confusing, even to someone who's seen hundreds of porn sites.

Navigation - a hatefully basic search facility where you can click on "tags" but cannot exclude and results are limited when committing to a genreal search. Please sort it out, a tag cloud and improved search function isn't that difficult to magic up.

Content - inconsistent and varied. Of course you would expect that with an amateur site, but some are directed by a fairly professional team yet are still inconsistent. How does that work? If the webmasters offered hints and tips to the models then submitted content would very much improve to those who aren't sure.

Value for money - this I'm really struggling with. They say you get what you pay for in content, but I'm a little pissed off that the design and navigation qualities of the site make me NOT want to look in the first place.

Conclusion

Chick Pass is in bed with TAC Amateurs and is very much the poor relation. This is intended in reference to the state of the site not the content. If I'd known that a site would put me off visiting it then I wouldn't have visited in the first place.

Models of Chick Pass, make your voices heard. This is your revenue that the bone idle webmasters are costing - the portal needs investment and modernising, badly!

Webmasters of Chick Pass. Please stop insulting those who invest in your business and crack on with the much needed work. If your portal was easier on the eye and to navigate then your result would have been closer to the one that TheBestPorn offered (which I bitterly disagree with at present).

03-07-10  04:53am

Replies (0)
Review
15
Visit Cum On Wives

Cum On Wives
(0)

50.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Wide selection of videos and pics
- Good download speeds
Cons: - Much looks non-exclusive
- Content doesn't appear to be all amateur (known pornstars are in the sets)
Bottom Line: So, what is the site?

Billed as being run by "Rebecca" a swinger wife from Florida, the content is all "submitted" by visitor and site members.

Now call me cynical, but if me and my wife (also swingers) submitted our content then we'd expect something in return, there's no evidence (although I can be corrected) that any consideration is offered in return for the submission.

Not only that, but I rapidly came across content of pornstars. So either our webmistress hasn't researched the internet and sex industry or doesn't bother to check what "she" is willing to upload and sell to others.

At best this is copyright breaching by sheer ineptitude, at worst this site is one of those despised by those who work hard and at great expense to create their content only for it to be lifted by an opportunist. I do not know which applies here, although I have my suspicions.

The content itself is just as advertised, sets of 50 single cumshot pics in various positions of various quality, and videos of varying quality (well it is "submitted" stuff.)

Bottom line? The best I can say about the site is that it is a TGP that charges you to use it. Sorry, but you really need to get things together here.

04-07-10  06:34am

Replies (0)
Review
16
Visit Killer Gram

Killer Gram
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - High quality videos
- Features several under-utilised niches
- Gives names of models
- Regular updates
Cons: - No model bios
- None-exclusive content
- Picture collections poor
- Navigation can be confusing
Bottom Line: The Killergram collection aims squarely at British niche porn.

It achieves what it sets out to do (entertain and titillate) with a collection ranging from that most British of pastimes, dogging through hard-fi, cream pies, street hookers and good ol' glory holes.

This site has it all for many of your perversions out there. And let's face it, there's no more dirty a slut than a British one!!!!

Bottom line - highly recommended. There are aspects to improve upon, but not bad, not bad at all

09-29-08  11:16am

Replies (0)
Review
17
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)

86.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Extensive collection of sets
- Excellent video quality
- Good choice of pic quality (recent galleries 36 MP+)
- Good range of photographers
- Excellent quality of models (although everybody will have their favourite.)
- Simple navigation
- No DRM
- Good search function
- Good download speed
- Sticks to its principles
Cons: - Model bios could be a little more detailed
- Perhaps the general theme of the videos could move away from the shoot environment?
- Larger sets are repetitive (almost identical pics one after the other)
- Splitting a single shoot over 3 or more sets is a bit of a con.
Bottom Line: Will it get your dick hard? Well, if you are a red-blooded hetero man (or bi/gay woman) who appreciates the beauty of teen glamour modelling, then YES, it will.

Will you be cracking one off to it? Well, if you are of a very limited sexual experience, maybe, otherwise no.

Art is the best way of describing it. As a site it really does celebrate beauty of the female form (although in a very biased way) and you will spend a lot time simply staring (and probably wishing that you had these girl's number!!!!!)

You will come away with a renewed perspective of how beautiful women are.

Be warned though, if you are looking for something to wank off to, you are in the wrong place!

01-16-09  03:21am

Replies (1)
Reply
18
Visit Nadine France

Nadine France
(0)
Reply of turboshaft's Reply

I wouldn't like to speculate as to the exact reasons, for that I'd recommend e-mailing the webmaster and asking them directly.

Judging by the content and the time span that it covers, it is simply a case of the site coming to a natural end. Which with a site which is exclusively personal content, it is incredibly impressive that Nadine has been so busy to have such a varied range.

I'm very respectful of the decision, there are many out there who would simply keep things going without update until dwindling subscription fees no longer covered server upkeep costs. I would be very surprised if NadineFrance was no longer profitable for two reasons. Firstly, in many respects it sets the benchmark for others to follow in this particular niche. Secondly, there isn't that much said about the site in English speaking nations (in fact I only fell across it by accident.)

There is still material being uploaded though this is now on an "as and when" basis and there will no doubt be notification of the final date of shutdown.


10-28-09  11:54am

Reply
19
Visit Nadine France

Nadine France
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Reply

Yeah, she's still uploading vids that she hasn't had time to previously put up.

10-27-09  08:55am

Review
20
Visit Nadine France

Nadine France
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Original and Exclusive content
- Fairly easy navigation
- Broad range of material (within niche)
Cons: - It is soon to be retired (so get in while you can)
- No .zip downloads
- Older Vids have poor quality
- Older pics have poorer quality
Bottom Line: Nadine France is basically a site dedicated to a natural exhibitionist who takes a great deal of pleasure in documenting her perversion for others to see.

It appears to be a site that has endured a lot of longevity with updates going back to the beginning of the millenium.

From the very basic site design to the quality of some of the material, I should be quick off the mark to offer criticism and perhaps not a score so high.

But, it is so radically different from other sites in the same niche that you quickly warm to it and focus on the quality of the content which is remarkable.

Remarkable for one reason. This site (and its star) do it because they enjoy it, not because a photographer has offered them a quick buck for getting their tits out in public. And this stands the site apart from the rest.

This is amateur reality porn of the highest order. There is imagination in the shoots (you don't get the same old poses recycled as much as in other sites) the varying locations are mindboggling, from laboratories, to museums, to airports, to bars and the list goes on. And the list of action goes from solo flashing to couple action through to gangbangs (although the majority is solo)

Nadine is a natural exhibitionist who is showing her lifestyle to the world and it is a refreshing sidestep from the mediocrity of exhibitionism out there.

I do have criticism (after all it wouldn't be balanced.) The quality is amateur (but as an amateur site then this is expected) but I would hasten to observe that as an amateur site, pricing it as a pro site is a little cheeky.

And it is a shame to let a site that is soon to be retired miss out on some of the great potential that it had (and still does) to develop.

The bottom line: if you have a taste for amateur exhibitionism then you'll love Nadine France. Just make sure you get in before she takes the final steps of retirement and consigns a simply brilliant site to the great server in the sky!!!

10-25-09  11:18am

Replies (5)
Review
21
Visit POV Fantasy

POV Fantasy
(0)

71.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Does what it says on the tin
- Good general quality of models
- No time wasted in pointless interviews
- Part of a larger collection of sites
- DRM Free
- Fairly good download speeds
- .zip pic downloads
Cons: - Navigation pretty poor
- Pic sets are an after thought
- Infrequent updates
- Tempters for "Non- Exclusive" sites
Bottom Line: Considering the price (discount through TBP) perhaps I shouldn't have expected so much?

Whilst the site is exactly what it says it is and does achieve its aim in a roundabout way, it could be more.

The average update is weekly (though the saying does go that you get what you pay for.)

The navigation is basic but workable, the site is let down in the end by content (few updates) and treating the pic galleries as an afterthought (although if vidcaps are available these tend to be very good)

01-16-09  03:12am

Replies (0)
Reply
22
Visit Public Flash

Public Flash
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Reply

yeah I agree and I think that it is a great pity that a site with such great potential has been allowed to stagnate.

09-10-09  04:56am

Review
23
Visit Public Flash

Public Flash
(0)

74.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Models seem to know what they're doing
- Site created by people who understand the niche
- Good range of models / situations
- Appears natural (not forced or heavily scripted)
Cons: - Photos cannot be downloaded in .zip format
- Vids have to be watched/downloaded in clips only
- Appears to be no recently update photo sections
- Average number of shoots
- Get impression of recycled content
- Some content non-exclusive
- Site needs some work to bring it up to the standards that other sites have adopted as they have evolved over the years.
Bottom Line: As a brand new user (not a former site member who's returned) this content all looks new to me, although the odd shoot with 1999/2000 imprinted on it is a bit of a give away with a lot of video quality and a few other artefacts in the background.

If you are a previous member, my advice, stay away there is a very good chance that you've seen all this material already and would be wasting your money reinvesting. This is no Met-Art when it comes to purity of archiving.

For new members though; I'm glad to say that the site is what it sets out to be, with a broad section of models and the producers make the most of the fairly limited number of variables that you can have in public exposure.

However, the site does then begin to let itself down in its presentation.

The design of the site tells you that it has seen little updating to code etc in the years that it has been live. Navigation is reasonable with a rudimentary gallery for each section.

Picture and vid quality then begins to show the age of both the site and shoots, and the lack of .zip downloads for photo galleries and only being able to view vids as clips leaves the site out there with other turn of the millenium businesses that have failed to move on. It is a shame really as with a few basic updates and more shoots this could be a great site that is already aiming well at a niche category.

Overall quality of shoots (other than viewing quality) is good, although it is bizarre that on some shoots where a model has clearly been out for about an hour there are only about 12 pics???? With basic flashing, maturbation, public participation and even oral sex/facials so plenty to go round and the site producers know exactly where to be aiming (unlike some sites who aim for a niche and completely miss as they've no idea or interest in it themselves, so well done there.

My view. Not bad; with a bit of work it could be great, but not bad.

09-10-09  03:19am

Replies (3)
Reply
24
Visit Real Sex Pass

Real Sex Pass
(0)
Reply of Denner's Reply

Yeah, used to be a member of Killergram. If I remember back I think I gave them a very favourable review.

07-28-09  04:24pm

Reply
25
Visit Real Sex Pass

Real Sex Pass
(0)
Reply of Denner's Reply

I see what you are getting at, and it did take me a while to come to my decision to give RealSexPass such a low rating.

I respect that there are a couple of things you enjoyed, and there are the collectables, but do you really think that it is worth so much for only a few things?

It has been asked what I would rate it if it were half the price....... my answer was that it would be 70+.

But for the price that I paid, I am NOT getting value for money, and that is what prompted me to be so critical......... I paid a lot for it, I expect a lot from it, and I'm simply not getting what I paid for, and that is the basis of my score.


07-25-09  04:36pm


Shown : 1-25 of 35 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.04 seconds.