Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ChickPass Amateurs

ChickPass Amateurs (0)

Active
68
bacardiancoke (22) 03-07-10  04:53am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Huge Collection of material
- Proper amateur work, very natural with no visible known porn stars
- good download speeds
Cons: - Very poor navigation
- Search facility is more basic than a Jungle toilet
- inconsistent material
- Can't decide if the site is value for money or not
- Updates are nothing to write home about
- X Sales. Sign of a con artist, not a good way of building my trust!
Bottom Line: If you are looking for amateur (sometimes user submitted porn) then this is certainly a place to entertain for one subscription period.

It is generally passable and for those who like their amateurs then it will keep you entertained for a while.

I won't go into individual "stars" due to the way that the portal is structured and will instead take an overall view of presentation and content.

Presentation

I grow tired of portals and sites that are stuck firmly in their "pre-2005" type design and layout. It is lazy and insulting to those of us who pay good money to use your sites. PLEASE will you start modernising!

Design - poor and confusing. They appear to have tried to make it simple and have instead left it with a bizarre structure that is confusing, even to someone who's seen hundreds of porn sites.

Navigation - a hatefully basic search facility where you can click on "tags" but cannot exclude and results are limited when committing to a genreal search. Please sort it out, a tag cloud and improved search function isn't that difficult to magic up.

Content - inconsistent and varied. Of course you would expect that with an amateur site, but some are directed by a fairly professional team yet are still inconsistent. How does that work? If the webmasters offered hints and tips to the models then submitted content would very much improve to those who aren't sure.

Value for money - this I'm really struggling with. They say you get what you pay for in content, but I'm a little pissed off that the design and navigation qualities of the site make me NOT want to look in the first place.

Conclusion

Chick Pass is in bed with TAC Amateurs and is very much the poor relation. This is intended in reference to the state of the site not the content. If I'd known that a site would put me off visiting it then I wouldn't have visited in the first place.

Models of Chick Pass, make your voices heard. This is your revenue that the bone idle webmasters are costing - the portal needs investment and modernising, badly!

Webmasters of Chick Pass. Please stop insulting those who invest in your business and crack on with the much needed work. If your portal was easier on the eye and to navigate then your result would have been closer to the one that TheBestPorn offered (which I bitterly disagree with at present).

Reply To Review

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to bacardiancoke!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.