Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : bacardiancoke (22)  

Feedback:   All (35)  |   Reviews (20)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (15)

Other:   Replies Received (17)  |   Trust Ratings (27)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-17 of 17  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A REPLY TO #4 from otoh: (bacardiancoke's Reply)

Once again, bacardiancoke has echoed my sentiments. Maybe a membership a new year present would be better!

12-24-11  06:30am

Reply
2
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(6)
Reply of bacardiancoke's Review from roseman:

nice

12-23-11  06:55am

Reply
3
Visit Teen Sex Couple

Teen Sex Couple
(0)
Reply of bacardiancoke's Review from fairguy112:

I joined about 2 months ago when it was a new site. I was very disappointed about a number of things. Firstly, the length of the videos - a great number of them are less than 9 minutes. Secondly, there is no real talking between Jessica and Dave it's very boaring to me. Lastly the reason why it is POV is he is trying to conceal his identity, in a number of the clips he has a sheet over his face. I usually like to archive content, but with this I just deleted it from my hard drive and felt like I wasted 20 dollars. Ofcourse, this is just my opinion, but I would never in a million year's rejoin this site.

12-22-11  10:11pm

Reply
4
Visit Teen Sex Couple

Teen Sex Couple
(0)
Reply of bacardiancoke's Review from tboy:

Thanks for the review, all things considered I'll give this site a trial and see how I get on, sometimes the real gems are hidden in the rough!

12-21-11  11:17am

Reply
5
Visit Torbe Network

Torbe Network
(0)
Reply of bacardiancoke's Review from JustThy:

thanks for your feedback, just one question... about the cross sales you mention, it was un-checked on the join form right? you had to manually activate it yourself...
thanks.
thy


04-07-10  07:53am

Reply
6
Visit Public Flash

Public Flash
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from rearadmiral: (bacardiancoke's Reply)

Excellent review. Thanks for making it so detailed. I had been a member a year or so ago and downloaded most of what was there and I was actually thinking about joining again this weekend, but based on your review I think I'll skip it. You just saved me some cash. The bad news is, as has been pointed out, that this site had so much potential. This is a poorly served niche - U.S. publio nudity. I hope they come back with some new stuff soon.

02-19-10  12:48pm

Reply
7
Visit Nadine France

Nadine France
(0)
Reply of bacardiancoke's Review from dracken:

Great review. It's a shame that another good amateur site is going down...Hopefully she has enough videos around that she will update teh site for a while :)

10-30-09  04:17pm

Reply
8
Visit UK Flashers

UK Flashers
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from WeeWillyWinky: (bacardiancoke's Reply)

Same as RB here. Thanks for the review. I won't be bothering with this one.

10-28-09  10:59pm

Reply
9
Visit Nadine France

Nadine France
(0)
Reply of bacardiancoke's Review from turboshaft:

Great review!

I'm not a big fan of exhibitionism, but when and why is she ending the site, or at least claiming to?


10-27-09  10:14pm

Reply
10
Visit Nadine France

Nadine France
(0)
Reply of bacardiancoke's Review from mbaya:

I checked out the tour and I must agree it looks really good. The site states that it will end in December of 2008, but is still going. I have to wonder if she still plans to end it soon.

10-27-09  08:12am

Reply
11
Visit UK Flashers

UK Flashers
(0)
Reply of bacardiancoke's Review from RagingBuddhist:

This is a great review - and a very generous score for a site that's outdone by user-submitted sites. This was always one of those "should I or shouldn't I" sites for me. I see I shouldn't. Thanks for the warning.

10-25-09  08:53pm

Reply
12
Visit Public Flash

Public Flash
(0)
Reply of bacardiancoke's Review from mbaya:

Nice, fairly complete review of a site that I liked. You did a better job than mine did, but that was my first review. I am sorry to say that the site is not growing much or evolving and keeping up with the times. I thought the videos were not the best quality and I didn't appreciate that there was no option for a whole video download.

09-10-09  03:48am

Reply
13
Visit Real Sex Pass

Real Sex Pass
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from Denner: (bacardiancoke's Reply)

Well, your're right - about the price.
At the time of my short membership - skipped it after a month - I found some good stuff. But a price like maybe $19.95 would be more fair...
Then again, have you seen Killergram?
Also a british site - very expensive ($39.95) and with a LOT of material - and in many ways great quality. But even if you get a heap of stuff here, it tends to become stereotype - the same style all over. Never saved anything from here - and I was a member twice.
It's not always so simpel, that the price follows the content/quality - but we all got different taste and views - and that's good...


07-28-09  07:20am

Reply
14
Visit Real Sex Pass

Real Sex Pass
(0)
Reply of bacardiancoke's Review from Denner:

I have NOT been at this site for over a year or more - no, sorry - almost two years - see my review.
Still it was then - not THAT bad a site - not bad enough to put is a a ripoff - actually I still have 3-4 of the best damn hc-videos (exclusive) of Michelle Thorne and Veronica Cruz (aka this and this) from that site - and a couple of others.
Especially those hc/bg videos of those two named models are worth a lot for a collector - you'll not find them anywhere else...
But ok, if the site has lived up to 2009 - it's NOT good.
Anyway - guess I'd have to take another look....


07-25-09  07:57am

Reply
15
Visit Real Sex Pass

Real Sex Pass
(0)
Reply of bacardiancoke's Review from Jay G:

Good review, but another reminder that "You get what you pay for" does NOT apply to Porn. ALL the worst sites I have ever joined were expensive compared to good sites.

I believe bad sights know they can only rip off smaller numbers of people than quality sights and up their prices to make up the difference. Quality sites can charge a reasonable or even bargain price because they get large quantities of customers including many repeat customers. I go back to quality sites on a regular basis myself on a regular basis.

But, yes, I've been fooled many times into paying higher prices with the false promise of something better.....thanks for the warning!


07-25-09  02:39am

Reply
16
Visit Real Squirt

Real Squirt
(0)
Reply of bacardiancoke's Review from Brainpat:

Hi,

thanks for the review. For what it's worth, I wanted to add Kream is the coolest chick and she even has done a tutorial to make girls squirt on a member's request.

She has tons of scenes since her site's been updated weekly for years.

The pornsrarnetwork also has two other sites dedicated to squirt: pornstarsquirt and swallowsquirt!

Thanks again for taking the time to review!


02-23-09  10:42am

Reply
17
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(1)
Reply of bacardiancoke's Review from lk2fireone:

Nice solid review of met-art. Welcome to PU, from one newbie to another.

01-16-09  06:25am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-17 of 17  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.11 seconds.