Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : bacardiancoke (22)  

Feedback:   All (35)  |   Reviews (20)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (15)

Other:   Replies Received (17)  |   Trust Ratings (28)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 35 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The trouble with the holiday period, spending time with family.

If you give yourself the present of a site membership, then it sits there doing nothing until you can finally get rid of the people that you didn't want to see in teh first place. *xmas rant*


12-24-11  03:53am

Reply
2
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Jessica Rabbit by a mile.

Of course, my decision may have been influenced a little bit by the POV roleplay feat. Gianna Michaels.


12-22-11  01:21am

Review
3
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Well planned, well executed site
- Good, logical, easy navigation
- Always high standard of content
- Good value for money
- Regular updates
Cons: - File sizes for pics / vids
- Stop bothering us with x sales...
- Some sub sites stopped updating. Why?
Bottom Line: Welcome to the infamous BangBros, a male driven hedonistic landscape where the men are purile, and the women are hot.

What comes of this coupling is mainstream, but still unique and consistently high quality content.

Whether you want to fill your boots with the Boys of Bang Bus picking up hot girls to fuck around town (literally) to watching some well known faces taking hot creampies, this is your testosterone powered wank material....

There are a couple of things to pick at:

The picture zip files are huge! (the same size as the videos in some cases.) Why not offer us a stripped down version instead? I mean, when you're looking at pics on a mobile device, why do we need something ~4000 pixels in size?

Some of the sites have stopped updating. These tend to be the more niche sites or behind the scenes efforts. That's a pity, as (behind the scenes esp.) is a simple and effective tool that keeps viewers interested, and would certainly keep my subscription for longer.

The bottom line: One of the market leaders, and rightly so.

12-22-11  01:10am

Replies (1)
Reply
4
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

If the site is specialist in some way (niche, performer etc.) then signing up as a one off is no bad thing.

12-22-11  12:53am

Review
5
Visit Teen Sex Couple

Teen Sex Couple
(0)

74.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Genuine amateurs
- Exclusive content
- Regular updates (at least 1 per week)
- All videos available in HD
Cons: - No pics, only video menu
- No screen caps offer for videos
- No biog other than quick site overview
- No interactivity on site (other than e-mail address.)
- No categorisation of videos, just chronological order
Bottom Line: I have come to Teen Sex Couple with an open mind. It is a brand new site billed as run by the couple (Jessica and Dave) themselves with only their content.

This has come to pass, and the collection of content is their own, and won't be found anywhere else.

There is a full range of activities available (outdoor, anal, facials, creampies etc.) so this is definately a well planned venture for the couple who are happy to show off the sexuality, making this a very refreshing site to see.

But, there are also downsides to how they have presented both the site and themselves.

The member's area exists on one page, there is no categorisation of videos and no interactivity at all.

This is a great shame as they have an opportunity to make the site about their lifestyle as a whole as well as their exhibitionism.

Whilst the content of the videos is generally high, the method of shooting (from wherever Dave is holding the cam) is more of an acquired taste, a sort of gonzo meets POV and can get the worst of both worlds rather than the best. I'm not suggesting that the shooting of the vids is poor, but tends to focus very heavily on close ups, especially on Dave's cock, which is a great pity as it prevents the viewer from seeing more of Jessica.

In the videos (and site in general) interactivity is paid lip service with a few quotes from other members and a couple of videos at member requests.

Considering the site is presented to you by Jessica and Dave, it can be confusing at times that it is shot in a manner to give the viewer the impression the POV impression that they are fucking Jessica. Take for example, Dawn's Place, where the site is presented to you by her and little is mentioned of her partner. By contrast, Jessica and Dave seem to operate in a perspective no man's land.

In general, this site has solid content, which has the opportunity to be great content.

As the site develops, I really do hope that Jessica and Dave work on their sometimes questionable camera shots, introduce screen caps and photoshoots and work on interactivity which is frankly the standard for amateur sites like this to survive.

The bottom line: for a new site with genuine amateurs; not bad, not bad at all. I hope to see it develop further as I'd love in the future to give it a much higher score.

12-21-11  06:43am

Replies (2)
Rating
6
Visit Sarah 4 You

Sarah 4 You
(0)

58.0
No Review.
05-02-10  07:24am

Reply
7
Visit Torbe Network

Torbe Network
(0)
Reply of JustThy's Reply

Yes, it was one that you have to manually activate yourself.

However, I mention it because in the rush to complete the sales procedure people can misread an invitation for an opt-out.

It kinda covers all bases and is kinder than "Read what you're doing, numbnuts!" :)


04-09-10  03:41am

Review
8
Visit Torbe Network

Torbe Network
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good selection of models
- Good amateur content
- Good download speeds
- Exclusive content
Cons: - Odd navigation
- Updates are bitty
- Some sites haven't seen updates in a long time
Bottom Line: The Torbe Network is a collection of sites that range from solo models to bukkake and the old chestnut "meet a chick on a street, offer her cash and take her back to your place to fuck"

Not hugely different to other network sites, Torbe has its strengths and its weaknesses.

Going for it is some originality in some of its content mixed with a great ability to get real, amateur, attractive models. Well done there.

Downloading content is easy enough and fairly quick. Pic sets come in .zip form. Various vid types (wmv, mp4, mpg and mov available.)

On the downside, pic sets are few and far between and vidcaps and only available on some sets which is a pity.

The only thing that lets it down for me is the male models. I am of the opinion that the male models (unless in a specific storyline) ought to be like spooks - unobtrusive, invisible etc. Unfortunately this isn't really the case in many of the vids here which is a great shame considering they are otherwise almost all great examples of how amateur content can look.

The bottom line? If you like your european (and some argentinan) amateur models in different situations then this is certainly for you.

Oh, and keep a watch out for cross sales (which are an opt in though.) Though by now you should all be watching out when you sign up for sites anyway!

04-07-10  06:43am

Replies (2)
Review
9
Visit Cum On Wives

Cum On Wives
(0)

50.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Wide selection of videos and pics
- Good download speeds
Cons: - Much looks non-exclusive
- Content doesn't appear to be all amateur (known pornstars are in the sets)
Bottom Line: So, what is the site?

Billed as being run by "Rebecca" a swinger wife from Florida, the content is all "submitted" by visitor and site members.

Now call me cynical, but if me and my wife (also swingers) submitted our content then we'd expect something in return, there's no evidence (although I can be corrected) that any consideration is offered in return for the submission.

Not only that, but I rapidly came across content of pornstars. So either our webmistress hasn't researched the internet and sex industry or doesn't bother to check what "she" is willing to upload and sell to others.

At best this is copyright breaching by sheer ineptitude, at worst this site is one of those despised by those who work hard and at great expense to create their content only for it to be lifted by an opportunist. I do not know which applies here, although I have my suspicions.

The content itself is just as advertised, sets of 50 single cumshot pics in various positions of various quality, and videos of varying quality (well it is "submitted" stuff.)

Bottom line? The best I can say about the site is that it is a TGP that charges you to use it. Sorry, but you really need to get things together here.

04-07-10  06:34am

Replies (0)
Reply
10
N/A Reply of littlejoe's Poll

Hi res is great, but there has to be something to give.

By that I mean the models. There are models who have hard bodies and figures of a goddess, but in real porn there is a huge cross section of models, from goddess to average.

Natural markings (stretch marks etc) make little difference to anyone in standard def, but give high def with a poor camera operator and you will rapidly find yourself staring at things that you really don't need to see.


04-07-10  06:28am

Reply
11
N/A Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

Though, to be fair, it could have been any number of different reasons.... guess we'll never know what it was that prompted them to choose you.

I get picked on a lot at security, though nearly always in lands foreign to mine. Guess I just have that kind of face......


03-17-10  12:00pm

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

Considering the sheer amount of data and the general ineptitude of my (British) govt to actually keep hold of data without it being misplaced on public transport, I highly doubt it.

There will be intelligence gathering on individuals if they fit a certain criteria to be a person of interest, but in general they couldn't give a bollocks as long as you are paying your taxes.

The people who issue store loyalty cards have more personal information on you than the govt ever will.

AND, we brits really have the edge when it comes to snooping on our own govt, search "secret bases" and see how we identify our own installations!!!!! Try that in the US and you'd never be heard from again.


03-17-10  11:57am

Review
13
Visit TAC Amateurs

TAC Amateurs
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Fairly extensive range of content
- Good cross section of different women
- No DRM
- Good d/l speed
Cons: - Navigation
- Network design
- Range of recent content
Bottom Line: TAC, is a network of amateur porn stars. Basically women who could live next door to you who upload their own content.

As such you can find different and at times refreshing content in different situations ranging from cute sets up to bukkake gangbangs.

But (and this you'll know if you read other reviews of mine) I'm heading rapidly to my biggest set of bugbears with amateur portals and many porn sites in general.

The webmasters at TAC are sorely letting the side down. They appear to be afflicted by the same level of laziness or apathy that is sweeping through porn sites 3yr old+ across the whole of cyberspace.

The design is tired, navigation is infuriating thanks to quite possibly the worst breakdown of categories that I have ever seen, no tags or a search function!!!! That's abysmal.

The individual sites vary in quality according to age and willing of the models so I'll not get too bogged down with content and instead stick with the appeal of the network and management.

There are very few updates for a network style of site, this is because I can find very few newer models. And I think I know why; and it points straight back to the design and implementation of the main portal.

If me and my wife were to launch a swing site we'd probably want to shelter of a network such as TAC as we are no webmasters by any stretch of the imagination.

But we wouldn't in a million years choose TAC to host our content. It looks neglected, disinterested and don't feel that we would be able to promote our work enough.

MANAGERS OF TAC, hear your public speak! Until you modernise your portal you are stopping content providers from signing up and keeping your revenue down. You have the potential of a great network, but not until you get your arses in gear and breathe life back into your project.

03-09-10  10:52am

Replies (0)
Review
14
Visit ChickPass Amateurs

ChickPass Amateurs
(0)

68.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Huge Collection of material
- Proper amateur work, very natural with no visible known porn stars
- good download speeds
Cons: - Very poor navigation
- Search facility is more basic than a Jungle toilet
- inconsistent material
- Can't decide if the site is value for money or not
- Updates are nothing to write home about
- X Sales. Sign of a con artist, not a good way of building my trust!
Bottom Line: If you are looking for amateur (sometimes user submitted porn) then this is certainly a place to entertain for one subscription period.

It is generally passable and for those who like their amateurs then it will keep you entertained for a while.

I won't go into individual "stars" due to the way that the portal is structured and will instead take an overall view of presentation and content.

Presentation

I grow tired of portals and sites that are stuck firmly in their "pre-2005" type design and layout. It is lazy and insulting to those of us who pay good money to use your sites. PLEASE will you start modernising!

Design - poor and confusing. They appear to have tried to make it simple and have instead left it with a bizarre structure that is confusing, even to someone who's seen hundreds of porn sites.

Navigation - a hatefully basic search facility where you can click on "tags" but cannot exclude and results are limited when committing to a genreal search. Please sort it out, a tag cloud and improved search function isn't that difficult to magic up.

Content - inconsistent and varied. Of course you would expect that with an amateur site, but some are directed by a fairly professional team yet are still inconsistent. How does that work? If the webmasters offered hints and tips to the models then submitted content would very much improve to those who aren't sure.

Value for money - this I'm really struggling with. They say you get what you pay for in content, but I'm a little pissed off that the design and navigation qualities of the site make me NOT want to look in the first place.

Conclusion

Chick Pass is in bed with TAC Amateurs and is very much the poor relation. This is intended in reference to the state of the site not the content. If I'd known that a site would put me off visiting it then I wouldn't have visited in the first place.

Models of Chick Pass, make your voices heard. This is your revenue that the bone idle webmasters are costing - the portal needs investment and modernising, badly!

Webmasters of Chick Pass. Please stop insulting those who invest in your business and crack on with the much needed work. If your portal was easier on the eye and to navigate then your result would have been closer to the one that TheBestPorn offered (which I bitterly disagree with at present).

03-07-10  04:53am

Replies (0)
Reply
15
N/A Reply of Duante Amorculo's Poll

Reality shows are essentially voyeurism without actual sex/porn.

Why would I want to watch a show about a Porn* that doesn't involve porn at some point?


11-02-09  02:17am

Reply
16
Visit Nadine France

Nadine France
(0)
Reply of turboshaft's Reply

I wouldn't like to speculate as to the exact reasons, for that I'd recommend e-mailing the webmaster and asking them directly.

Judging by the content and the time span that it covers, it is simply a case of the site coming to a natural end. Which with a site which is exclusively personal content, it is incredibly impressive that Nadine has been so busy to have such a varied range.

I'm very respectful of the decision, there are many out there who would simply keep things going without update until dwindling subscription fees no longer covered server upkeep costs. I would be very surprised if NadineFrance was no longer profitable for two reasons. Firstly, in many respects it sets the benchmark for others to follow in this particular niche. Secondly, there isn't that much said about the site in English speaking nations (in fact I only fell across it by accident.)

There is still material being uploaded though this is now on an "as and when" basis and there will no doubt be notification of the final date of shutdown.


10-28-09  11:54am

Reply
17
Visit Nadine France

Nadine France
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Reply

Yeah, she's still uploading vids that she hasn't had time to previously put up.

10-27-09  08:55am

Reply
18
Visit UK Flashers

UK Flashers
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

I'm glad to be of service!!!!

I thought personally that the score I gave was fair as a gesture towards the fact that the site had stuck to it's niche. The quality beyond that dragged the score down heavily.

Another site I reviewed bore little to zero resemblance to its niche and that got a worse score.


10-26-09  06:41am

Review
19
Visit Nadine France

Nadine France
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Original and Exclusive content
- Fairly easy navigation
- Broad range of material (within niche)
Cons: - It is soon to be retired (so get in while you can)
- No .zip downloads
- Older Vids have poor quality
- Older pics have poorer quality
Bottom Line: Nadine France is basically a site dedicated to a natural exhibitionist who takes a great deal of pleasure in documenting her perversion for others to see.

It appears to be a site that has endured a lot of longevity with updates going back to the beginning of the millenium.

From the very basic site design to the quality of some of the material, I should be quick off the mark to offer criticism and perhaps not a score so high.

But, it is so radically different from other sites in the same niche that you quickly warm to it and focus on the quality of the content which is remarkable.

Remarkable for one reason. This site (and its star) do it because they enjoy it, not because a photographer has offered them a quick buck for getting their tits out in public. And this stands the site apart from the rest.

This is amateur reality porn of the highest order. There is imagination in the shoots (you don't get the same old poses recycled as much as in other sites) the varying locations are mindboggling, from laboratories, to museums, to airports, to bars and the list goes on. And the list of action goes from solo flashing to couple action through to gangbangs (although the majority is solo)

Nadine is a natural exhibitionist who is showing her lifestyle to the world and it is a refreshing sidestep from the mediocrity of exhibitionism out there.

I do have criticism (after all it wouldn't be balanced.) The quality is amateur (but as an amateur site then this is expected) but I would hasten to observe that as an amateur site, pricing it as a pro site is a little cheeky.

And it is a shame to let a site that is soon to be retired miss out on some of the great potential that it had (and still does) to develop.

The bottom line: if you have a taste for amateur exhibitionism then you'll love Nadine France. Just make sure you get in before she takes the final steps of retirement and consigns a simply brilliant site to the great server in the sky!!!

10-25-09  11:18am

Replies (5)
Review
20
Visit UK Flashers

UK Flashers
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Content appears original
- Fairly easy to navigate
- Can use download manager
Cons: - Videos poor quality
- Complete vids not available
- Updates very few and far between (doesn't appear to be much new at all)
- Basic design
- Content is poorly directed
Bottom Line: I have a biased view when it comes to my porn (anyone who doesn't needs professional help imho) and when it comes to sites that rely on pics as much or more than vids it is about the quality and eroticism.

Exhibitionism can be very erotic and not something that has to "hit you in the face" with its bluntness. Unfortunately for UK Flashers, it falls sqaurely into the category of "blunt" in its approach.

Before I get onto the aspects of quantity, I'd like to look at the quality of the content, mostly as it is what is sticking out most to me.

Many of the models are not actually models by trade (yeah, obvious to many that they are working girls, but there are still those out there who believe that they are simply models trying to break into the industry.)

Whilst the models will have a concept of poses etc, a majority of the work and direction is carried out by the photographer. The photographer used for this site appears to have a complete lack of imagination (or interest) and the results are the same poses with the only variation being the location.

As for the poses themselves and the camera angles used? Unflattering on the models to say the very least, amateur in production, completely lacking in eroticism (many are plain seedy.) It's as though a bored 18 year old has gone out with his dad's camera, collared a few girls and led with the direction, "Show us yer gash!" There are user submitted sites out there with more professional content than here!

Harsh? Maybe, but combined with so few updates, a basic and tired design and layout and vid quality from early dsl days, this is a site that I'd struggle to recommend for even half the price that I paid.

10-25-09  11:01am

Replies (3)
Review
21
Visit Sammy4U

Sammy4U
(0)

81.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Great real unscripted porn
- Good selection of vids and clips
- Navigation reasonable
- Good selection of scenes / situations
- Excellent restrained use of extra stars
Cons: - Very few recent updates
- x Selling
- more focus on selling other sites than concentrating on own
Bottom Line: So, as a fan of swinger porn (as a swinger myself it is always a pleasure to watch) it was inevitable that sooner or later I would darken the doorstep of Sammy4U.

All in all the site achieves what it sets out to do and it is completely evident that the site is put together by a team of people who know what they are doing, and more importantly, enjoy what they are doing. Anyone who's been a member of some of those faceless generic porn sites created by a geek just hoping to make some money by raiding the porn libraries will know EXACTLY what I mean by that.

The problem that many solo sites suffer from has shown its face in Sammy4U........ mainly updates.

Now, as a human being and not a robot, it is of course to be expected that Sammy won't be out banging away all day everyday, but in the time that I've been a member updates have been infrequent with more focus on twitter updates and stories rather than the key galleries and vids that are why so many of us join.

Granted, there are updates to the "freebies" section, but I really don't count this area as the content is quite different from that of the main site and not the reason I joined.

The content is absolutely fantastic, no complaints from me there!

It is a shame that there isn't more otherwise the score would have been beyond 90.

09-11-09  06:23am

Replies (0)
Reply
22
Visit Public Flash

Public Flash
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Reply

yeah I agree and I think that it is a great pity that a site with such great potential has been allowed to stagnate.

09-10-09  04:56am

Review
23
Visit Public Flash

Public Flash
(0)

74.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Models seem to know what they're doing
- Site created by people who understand the niche
- Good range of models / situations
- Appears natural (not forced or heavily scripted)
Cons: - Photos cannot be downloaded in .zip format
- Vids have to be watched/downloaded in clips only
- Appears to be no recently update photo sections
- Average number of shoots
- Get impression of recycled content
- Some content non-exclusive
- Site needs some work to bring it up to the standards that other sites have adopted as they have evolved over the years.
Bottom Line: As a brand new user (not a former site member who's returned) this content all looks new to me, although the odd shoot with 1999/2000 imprinted on it is a bit of a give away with a lot of video quality and a few other artefacts in the background.

If you are a previous member, my advice, stay away there is a very good chance that you've seen all this material already and would be wasting your money reinvesting. This is no Met-Art when it comes to purity of archiving.

For new members though; I'm glad to say that the site is what it sets out to be, with a broad section of models and the producers make the most of the fairly limited number of variables that you can have in public exposure.

However, the site does then begin to let itself down in its presentation.

The design of the site tells you that it has seen little updating to code etc in the years that it has been live. Navigation is reasonable with a rudimentary gallery for each section.

Picture and vid quality then begins to show the age of both the site and shoots, and the lack of .zip downloads for photo galleries and only being able to view vids as clips leaves the site out there with other turn of the millenium businesses that have failed to move on. It is a shame really as with a few basic updates and more shoots this could be a great site that is already aiming well at a niche category.

Overall quality of shoots (other than viewing quality) is good, although it is bizarre that on some shoots where a model has clearly been out for about an hour there are only about 12 pics???? With basic flashing, maturbation, public participation and even oral sex/facials so plenty to go round and the site producers know exactly where to be aiming (unlike some sites who aim for a niche and completely miss as they've no idea or interest in it themselves, so well done there.

My view. Not bad; with a bit of work it could be great, but not bad.

09-10-09  03:19am

Replies (3)
Review
24
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30
(1)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good Variety of Content (types etc)
- Good range of models
- Not a one trick pony
- good image and video quality
- No DRM
- No Download Limits
- Images in .zip option
- Newer vids have variety of formats
- Fantastic layout and organisation
Cons: - Some non exclusive content
- The video watermark is appalling
- er............ nope, I'll give up on that one
Bottom Line: If you've read any of my other reviews, you know it takes a lot to impress me. Well, here's a site that has.

The layout and organisation of the site makes it easy to navigate around and find exactly what you are looking for, be it a particular model, situation, type of nipple (I love that!) So, it is a site that is well designed which is always a fantastic place to start.

AS the site has developed over the years it has evolved and is making what appears to be continuous improvements which makes it stand out against some less able competitors.

There is a good range of models (by that I mean age, look etc) and there is a very good range of situations that they are in.

As an Englishman I must find fault, and I have found one. The watermark for the videos is terrible. I agree, mark your property out to prevent piracy, but at least be discreet.

Apart from that, a highly recommended site if you like your women older. Top of its class.

08-05-09  06:07am

Replies (0)
Reply
25
Visit Real Sex Pass

Real Sex Pass
(0)
Reply of Denner's Reply

Yeah, used to be a member of Killergram. If I remember back I think I gave them a very favourable review.

07-28-09  04:24pm


Shown : 1-25 of 35 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.85 seconds.