Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Incredible Quality
Simple Easy Menu
Often Update
HUGE, amount of pic/ vids
The quality is the best out here.
Cons:
The site downloads were average speed.
The price is average
Bottom Line:
If you like other quality sites like Twisties and others you will love this site.
The quality alone will blow you away.
I was amazed at the detail and quality.
This is a must membership.
Sadly I didn't hear about this site, until recently but I would put as the top 10 sites on the INTERNET.
There is a great variety, even a tad hard thrown in for the liking.
If you like quality HD pics and vids then come her, you have no idea what your missing this is a hidden treasure.
Follow-Up:
NEW FOLLOW UP . I did this last review 7 months ago I was new member at the time and reviewed it before spending more time on the site the quality impressed me so I went with that and thats where I made the error. so here goes. Digital Desire is a good site, I still stand by the fact the pic quality is very good. That said after being a member I found out some short falls. The menu system I complimented is actually very confusing and file saving is just about as hard to figure out. I had to to rate it a 79 as its average after seeing its many short falls. The cost is high, after being a past member the ask me to rejoin at $18.00 but I declined.
Bottom line is the women are very pretty over all a good selection, but I get the impression the are trying to make the site seem bigger and better then it is. As many files are the exact same ones only tammed up. With the same shoot same outfit so are in my mind duplicates. Pretty looking site, just it skin deep MO,deeper looks disapoited me.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The girls of very many lovely healthy teens.
Many big photographs and many HD movies.
Great originality !!
Cons:
An imperfect search service.
Models with two or more names.
Movies with two names.
A complicated kind of photographs.
All the names of ZIP are the same.
Login for which I am asked repeatedly.
Bottom Line:
The site which I love most.
Lovely couples' wonderful photographs.
I wrote the review of this site several years ago.
The site improved greatly.
Having a lot of movies, a lot of photographs had ZIP.
It is wonderful. Their photographs and movies became my treasure.
My favorite Pascalle C (seventeenspecial 671)
Special wonderful power of this site.
Such a lovely couple's photographs are not seen at other sites.
The photographs of her kiss are very lovely.
I love sweethearts' kiss photographs.
The kiss photographs which this site has are wonderful.
It is difficult to look for it at other sites and others.
Annabella(seventeenspecial 397)
Jenny N(winterspecial 18)(seventeenspecial 660)
Bella E(seventeenspecial 646,629,598)
Klaris(seventeenspecial 380)
Their photographs are my treasures similarly. These girls' movies as well as photographs are wonderful.
Since I desire such photographs and movies, I become a member of this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
12-01-1202:09am (Update History) Reason: Ran into another con.
Pros:
-2000x3000 resolution on latest photo sets
-Around 720 of those photosets are 3000px.
-Around 540 720p videos
-Interview videos
-updates once a day video every 5th update.
-Low price
Cons:
-Older sets 1600x1024 or under.
-Around 1900 of the photosets are 1600px or under.
-Around 500 videos are 420p.
-Videos have music.
-Majority of pictures are in the outdoors with natural lighting which I'm not a fan of but is personal taste
-Video links expire when using download manager. Makes downloading videos exponentially time consuming.
Bottom Line:
Based on the latest 3000px photos, technically the photo sets are well shot and composed. Personally I'm not a fan of the lighting. Most photosets are outdoors and most of the indoor sets have natural lighting from outside through the window. This might be a plus for some but for me it is not my style. I prefer the controlled lighting and indoor scenes.
Based on the latest 720p videos, the videos have a hazy dream sequence look to them. The videos have a music track to them. Both of which are not my style. Aside from that there are interviews with some of the models which are always a plus.
Search is done by broad categories hair color, breast type, shaved/unshaved, styles(wet,girlfriends, backstage, xxx stars etc). You can organize sets by publishing date or rating. There is also a checkbox for hd only so you only see 720p videos.
The models are more playboyesque type of models and they are photographed in that style. If you are looking for this style then this site is worth a try for the price offered. If you are looking for the amateur girl next door style this is not it. Whether or not you like this site depends on what style you like.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Alot of models, most are extremely hot 9's-10's
+ Among the best solo video content on the web
+ Huge amount of content
+ No DRM
+ High quality images and videos
+ Easy to navigate, alphabetical model index is well organized
+ Only $18 until October 1
Cons:
- Too many confusing categories: Dreamgirls, Dreamheat, Creamgirls, Raw Heat, Girlz-on-Girlz, Toi Story, Seasonal Spotlight, ????
- Photo sets tend to be split across categories
- Different mixes of the same video: a very softcore version as well as an "Extreme" version
- Some women look bored or overly posed in the photo sets
- Alot of makeup and airbrushing
Bottom Line:
Stephen Hicks has set many standards for photography, and this site illustrates the reasons why. Extremely beautiful, almost surrealistic women perform for your enjoyment. I won't belabor this point, if you haven't checked the site out and you're a glamour or solo model fan, then this site is a must see, for at least 1 month.
Also old news is that this site has dropped the DRM, which is a huge improvement.
Where the site falls apart in a bad way is with the categories and the division of content. The category names I listed above are real (believe it or not) and it is difficult to tell which is which. Perhaps these are just artifacts of when the site was split into an "extreme" section that used to cost extra, and the "normal" (read: softcore) section. What makes no sense at all is with all of the closeups of lubed up women, many of which you can find in the "normal" section, I do not understand why similar content is split off into "extreme" - which often just has more closeups or more "spread-eagle" shots. Don't get me wrong, the photos are hot, but the split up of photo sets and videos into the different confusing categories gets tiresome fast.
However, if you're willing to put up with the categories, and stick to the model index, you can find some excellent content, you just have to piece together the photo sets on your own. Also, the "extreme" solo videos are among the best I've seen.
Bottom line: Very hot solo models, tedious categories.
UPDATE: No major changes to my comments, but a score increase from 84 to 88, and also for continuing to offer the $18/month deal. Compared with other glamour sites, this is one of the best, in spite of the crazy categories.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very attractive models
Lots of variety
Good if you like young/european models
Decent picture resolution
Very large collection
Cons:
Very limited video, need to join an additional site to download full video
No zips
Extraordinarily poor organization, picture names are terrible and not in order, hard to keep track
Server seems relatively slow
Expensive
Bottom Line:
Probably not worth it unless you have a lot of spare time to search through all of the photosets and save (and probably rename) all of the pictures you like.
Great selection and very beautiful women, but hard to recommend given the limited video content and expense.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Very Large Library
-NO DRM
-Ability To Edit Scenes
-Good D/L Speed
-Great Extra Site (Caballero)
Cons:
-Only One Video Format (.wmv)
-Not Many Photos
-Star Index Could Be Better
-Only about 4 updates a month
Bottom Line:
Pornstar Classics is for the lover of the good old days. If you weren't alive in the good old days, you may find it interesting, but of course the film/video is aged. This site has improved a lot since I was a member a few years ago.
I don't count the aged look of the film/video as a negative, because this is a classic site. Some of the stuff is about 40 years old. Personally I sort of like it, because it brings me back. All the old great stars are here: Ginger Lynn, Annette Haven, Johnny Wadd, Tina Russell, etc. In the old days, this stuff was very expensive, first as film, then early VHS. It was difficult to collect a lot. Now it's all at your fingertips. They have tons of full features, but also a lot of the old "loops", like the Showgirl series.
The main extra site here is Caballero Classics, a great extra. They have a huge library as well, all their own titles. All told, so far they have about 700 films. They only update about 2 films every 2 weeks though.
They only have .wmv available here, but in 3 sizes, the largest being 640X480 927kbps. It's too bad they don't have many photos---scans of the old mags would be great if they could manage it. I'm downloading here at 1.2MB/s. The star index needs to be improved, but is functional.
A great feature of these sites is the Videobox style scene editor. All sites need this.
I give this a high score because the material is so great. Only the old timers may like this site, but newbies may want to check out what Dad was watching!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Tons of content.
- Very cute models.
- Stays within the teeny niche.
- *Some* of the video content is top notch.
- Newer pics are decent at 800x1200, and there are quite a few, to say the least.
Cons:
- What the hell does Seventeen mean?
- Way ! too expensive for us yanks. 40+ buckaroos.
- Choices are great, but this site overwhelms you with choices, causing navigational havoc. See BL.
- Pic size could (should) go up a notch. Older pics are just too small for the jaded collector of 2008.
- No zips
- "High" quality option for vid downloads not so high, at least for the vids I checked. In fact, at 604 kbps, it looks dismal at full screen.
- Pages take too long to load because of all the fancy but useless pic-frame borders and variously-colored backgrounds.
Bottom Line:
I was turned down at first by this site but they took me on my second try. So here goes:
I'm disappointed. Main problem: the site needs Organization. Categories are a good thing, but this place is category mayhem. There are 35+ picture-gallery categories, and a few of these are split into "gallery" and "archive". Some categories have separate numbered archives. In the vid section (which is called Seventeen Cinema [I think] and requires another log-in) there are 42 categories, or "labels". The vids are taken from full-length DVDs which you can order and are not entities unto themselves. Most vids offer high and low downloads. Some offer "full", which means highest quality: 2100 kbps, 720X540. These vids look great.
For pic collectors like Willy, who has short term memory loss in spades, all these categories are too much: blondes, brunettes, redheads, wet teens, shaved teens, kinky teens, schoolgirls, highschool girls, dirty teens, anal teens, left-handed teens, vertically-challenged teens, teens who read Proust.... you get the idea. There are some great sets and tons of cute models, but while I'm browsing and clicking I keep wondering what I might be missing someplace else. There is a model directory, but each name I clicked on merely took me to a set of four or five pics: not thumbs leading to sets or vids, just pictures! What's the point of a directory if it doesn't direct you to the model's content?
I'm running low on characters. BL: save your dough, yanks.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They've had a special discount of $9.95 for the first month for a while now. If you don't see that price listed, I'd wait for a holiday special price of $9.95 for the first month, since there are all kinds of holidays they offer that price at.
-They have an outstanding collection of beautiful and lovely models in the 18-early 20s age range.
-They have both photo sets and videos. The photo sets are offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-The videos are also offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-If you know what the site is, a stand-alone softcore glamour site of lovely young women, your expectations should be met. Don't expect hardcore action.
-The biggest con is probably that they constantly delete older material. Members often complain about it. I don't know why they delete when it irritates their members so much.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for most porn sites.
-No information on the models, except for the model's name.
-If you spend $75 at their on-site store, you get a free cock ring. Flash this cock ring at your local gay bar, and you can be the life of the party (sick joke?).
-This is a stand-alone site. No bonus sites are included with your membership.
-Video resolution goes up to 1080p. There are a few 4K videos, but they are definitely in the minority. Many PU members want a 4K option at the sites they join.
-Zip file for photosets is only offered in one definition. Strange for a glamour photosite.
-Some hot links don't work correctly.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Photosets: 3,800+
Videos: 1,000+
Models: 700+
Stephen Hicks died in 2013. He was the main photographer and owner of the Digital Desire website.
He specialized in high quality glamour photography over a decades long career.
His work appeared in such adult magazines as Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler, High Society and many more when those types of magazines were in their heyday (late 1960s through the 1980s).
He had an eye for beautiful women. And he presented them lovingly in softcore glamour photography.
One common complaint from the site members is that a lot of the content has been disappearing for many years. Not sure why. You have memories of some outstanding photographs, you come to the site, and it's not there any more. Which can be disappointing. This can happen at different websites, but the Digital Desire site is almost famous for deleting content.
They have over 700 models, most range from attractive to lovely.
Lena Anderson, Lexie Fox, Bailey Rayne, Keisha Grey, Shyla Jennings, Jade Couture, Kenze Thomas, Kasey Chase, Victoria Valmer, Aubrey Belle, the list of gorgeous women just goes on and on.
How a model is presented can make a world of difference in how attractive she looks. Digital Desire, under Stephen Hicks, was famous for its softcore glamcore approach.
Since he died in 2013, the site has featured a harder edge: it's not hardcore, but what you could call midcore, with female masturbation, lesbian. But I couldn't find what you would normally call hardcore, which features men having sex with women. No men at the site (except for the photographers).
Note: the site did feature female masturbation and lesbian before 2013, but it was with a softcore approach. I'm not explaining this very well. Let's call this a softcore site featuring some female masturbation and lesbian activity.
If you are a fan of the Playboy and Penthouse magazine photo layouts from the 1970s, then this site will probably appeal to you. Stephen Hicks contributed to those magazines. He had an eye for beautiful young women, and presented them in a loving glamcore setting. In both indoor and outdoor shoots.
Many photographers seem to have a problem with outdoor shoots. With the lighting or sound control or other factors. But the Digital Desire site has a professional approach that showcases the photo sets and videos and they are just a pleasure to view. And the soundtrack, which can often be annoying with random sounds or over-loud music at some sites, is not distracting. The Digital Desire site just presents you with a polished, softcore product, which is what you are looking for.
Although this site does not compare in amount of content versus such mega-sites as MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, I think it's definitely worth a join, if you are a fan of softcore glamcore photography.
Especially with the $9.95 price for the first month of membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Small, but kinky and perverse threesomes to group sex.
With such a small collection you can at least say you liked every scene.
All 24 scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p
Some of these scenes reach new highs or lows in how believable and perverse they are.
I received a promo for it after being a member of Granddadz and Grandparents X. This is similar to those sites and really would like to see them combine them all into one network.
Updating twice per month.
Cons:
I’ve seen some young male porn stars that seem overworked, but there’s a guy on here that I see in scenes all across this company’s sites named Gunther. He looks 60s, maybe 70s. I only list this as a con because he has trouble keeping it up.
I take this type of porn with the belief it’s in humor. At least one scene on this site is nearing disgusting.
There are some scenes that I don’t know who is supposed to be related or married or what they’re even doing.
Bottom Line:
This disgusting scene features Gunther, see con #1 and a much younger male with a much older woman who I would describe as Marilyn Manson, 20 years from now, after a sex change. The subject of the scene even recognizes it, “Nasty present for youngest sonâ€. A lot of these scenes are good. A few of them push the bad taste envelope.
I thought the best scene on the site was the best of any of their older/younger sites, it’s titled, “Luxury Wellness Receptionist†and has a very attractive man with a very pretty woman while Gunther joins in. He’s like a little Leprechaun.
I have had one common problem with their older/younger scenes and that is how short the scenes are. They have one scene here that has 9 people in it and it lasts barely 20 minutes.
The good thing with these sites is the high quality videos. 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The navigation doesn’t have to be that good. Every scene is on one page. I don’t recognize any of the models except Gunther. The main theme here starts with some sort of family connection. One is a family that is going to swinger’s club. I don’t know that I like admitting it, but the attraction for me is in the perverse nature of this niche. And they have such a broad range in looks between the models that it’s hard to imagine it being any less perverse, even without relation.
I’ll give it a decent score for the high quality everything and continuing to make scenes that seem near impossible to talk the younger people into. If they would combine this site with Grandparents X, Granddadz, Grandmams, I think it would be a major hit and at the top the older/younger genre.
Maybe it’s just my mind working in a bad way, but what happens – you know, when Gunther and the older stars kick the bucket? Of course, they can replace them, but he’s in so many of these scenes. The changes I would like to see made is either creating a network out of all their older/younger sites or speeding up the updates. I think if they combined the sites into a network you would be looking at a md-90s score. As it is, with a slow update schedule and a few really good scenes they have a chance to have a good to great site as the new updates come in, but it’s still going to take 3-4 years for them to just reach 100 total scenes.
It’s worth trying if you have tried and liked their other older/young scenes, especially if you get one of the cheaper promos, otherwise, I would wait a while and see what direction they take these sites into.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good camerawork, lighting
- Great quality pics, and HD videos
- Multiple video formats
- Lots and lots of very pretty girls
- Large archive of material
- Frequent updates
- Many well-known models and porn stars
- Excellent value
Cons:
- Slightly random selection of codecs for past videos
- Too many thongs
- Some fake boobs
- Not enough teasing
- Possibly too slick
- Slightly formulaic material
- Tagging and search sometimes lacking
- Not really any model details, stats etc
Bottom Line:
The esteemed tangub's recent review is excellent and gives you a good idea of the stats and type of material here, so I'll try not to repeat that and instead be quite subjective.
I joined mainly for the videos here, which have the level of explicitness that I like; some teasing, undressing, before masturbating; either with fingers or toys. The lighting, camerawork, atmosphere of them is very good (some may find the shadows too arty, but I don't mind), but my main problem is that they are a little too formulaic. The large majority of the videos go like this; ambient music as the model cavorts/gyrates in lingerie; often backlit and/or wind blowing through her hair; slow-motion and crossfades; then the music dies out and the model takes over, showing no shyness at all about pleasuring herself for the camera, underwear discarded (but heels inexplicably still on, why do they keep doing that?).
It's actually not a bad formula - they are produced very well and the girls seem fairly genuine, but I'd like to have seen a bit more variety; more teasing, more undressing from clothed, different lingerie styles, a bit less slow-mo and soft-focus. The category of videos I enjoyed the most were the flirt - where the model talks to the camera and teases; and perhaps also the toys - not generally my interest but it provided an angle.
The girls themselves here are stunning; a mix of well-known US porn stars and models, some familiar East European girls, and some amateur first-time models. Again, it's subjective, but I found myself pining for at least a little imperfection; although arguably guess I found it in the ones that have fake boobs - the focus is on natural girls and enhancements aren't in the majority, but still more than I'd expect given how often Mr Hicks states in the shoot notes how he prefers a natural look.
There's also, of course, a huge library of photo sets, going back many years. Although the models are biased slightly towards the 19-22 range (I prefer at least a little older) I found more sets that I liked than expected. The Flashback section is quite amusing, showing his earlier Penthouse era pics of girls with lip gloss and big hair; a contrast to the more subtle style and more natural looking girls Mr Hicks employs now. I did find a few inaccuracies in the search; eg when looking for unshaved models and finding shaved sets; but overall the search/browse options are useful. One minor niggle though, was in the models's profile page there is no info and sets don't seem to be in any particular order; some models are popular here with material from multiple shoots; it would be good to see it in date order.
So, a tricky one to score. It's an excellent site and great value; the material has a good level of explicitness and if I was being more objective, this would get a 90, and higher if I really connected with the content. As it is, it didn't grab me quite as much as I'd predicted; I do like glam material, but with an angle of some sort, which - other than lots of stunning girls - I don't see much of here. If I had to compare it to any other sites I've visited, I guess the centrefold glam theme places it closest to Holly Randall; DD is possibly more slick, but Ms Randall gets a bit more flirt, a bit more cheekiness from the models, so she keeps the edge for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Long scenes
- Mix of indoor and outdoor scenes
- Mix of American and Eastern European/Russian models
- Unique exclusive content
- Fun to watch
- ‘Bonus’ streaming scenes from other sites
Cons:
- Download speeds vary but tend to be lower than average
- No TBP discount
- Huge file sizes on some downloads
- Some non-English scenes with subtitles
Bottom Line:
The title of this site isn’t misleading. The scenes are all about games that lead to group sex. The games can be obvious, like strip poker but they are also innovative with various dice games, croquet, volleyball, etc. Most of the scenes spend a lot of time on the games before the sex begins. There may be challenges or dares with clothes being removed well before any sex happens. As the games progress the dares become more daring and fondling or even oral sex can happen briefly. Overall the scenes have a fun atmosphere and the games part of the scenes can be interesting to watch – for a while at least. One convention used in many of the scenes is an animated card is held up so the viewer can see what the dare or challenge is.
While most of the group sex involves men and women there are several scenes with only women.
One detail that should be noted early in any review is that many of the scenes here are quite different from ‘regular’ porn in one important way: they are loooong. I’m not saying that this is good or bad; I’m just stating it as a fact. There are some scenes here that are over four hours long. The average scene length is probably around two hours. This should give some indication as to how much time they spend on the games that lead up to the sex. To be fair though, the games quickly progress into sexual situations including nudity and touching so it isn’t like you have to wait three hours to see anything happen.
The scenes certainly look to be exclusive, and that fact combined with the overall uniqueness of them makes this an interesting choice for a membership.
The production values on the scenes are excellent. I had no issues with the camera work, the lighting, the sound or the editing. Many of the scenes are shot outdoors and they were great too, which can be a bit of a challenge.
Obviously with scenes averaging two hours that means that file sizes can be large. There are 720p scenes here that are in excess of 10GB. Downloading from this site is only for people who like this niche a lot, who have no concerns about file sizes and who have a fast internet connection.
Most of the models who appear on the site are well known porn models. TBP lists the site as being in the European niche but approximately a third of the scenes (and perhaps more) feature American models. All of the scenes with American models are, obviously, in English. Many of the scenes with non-American models use English but it isn’t uncommon to have the scene subtitled in English. I don’t find that this detracts from the scenes in any significant way.
The site currently has 126 scenes uploaded. This number may appear low at first when you look at the site because on each page there are 40 scene thumbnails. But many of the scenes are ‘bonus’ scenes from other sites. The bonus material is streaming only. There are currently 86 bonus scenes from sites such as Archangel, German Goo Girls, Perfect Gonzo, Porndoe Premium, Groupbanged.com and Jim Slip. (I recently had a membership at GGG and the file resolutions here are actually better than I could download on their own site.)
TBP noted that at the time of their review the site was updating with one new exclusive scene every two weeks. I don’t know if this will continue, but the update schedule has improved with the past few months bringing a new exclusive scene every week.
The exclusive scenes are available to be streamed or downloaded. Those are both available in three resolutions – 540p, 720p and 1080p. I downloaded the 720p scenes and those have a 7000kb/s bitrate and 30fps. I downloaded one 1080p scene to check the specs and those have a 9000kb/s bitrate and 25fps.
I used a download manager to queue the scenes and had no issues using it. I didn’t have any links time out on me – bet… given the file sizes I also didn’t queue many scenes at one time. I found download speeds to be the same as I get on other porn sites.
The price of the site is $27 USD which is on par with most adult sites. Unfortunately there is no TBP/PU discount. The primary biller is VXS Billing, a biller I have used in the past. While I’d prefer a more well known biller they do have an online form for cancellation and I don’t expect any issues on cancelling.
As with any niche site giving it a broad recommendation is difficult. If you like playful scenes with a sexy setup followed by some steamy group sex then this is a site you should check out. If you prefer to skip ahead to the action on all the scenes you watch then this site may not be the best choice for you. For what the site has I think it offers a very good value and if you’ve been sitting on the fence over a membership you should give it a try.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
The photography is excellent and unlike some sites (ahem, MetArt) they avoid putting the models into uncomfortable looking positions in uncomfortable places. Seeing models posing on beds or couches is far more common than the photographer trying to drape the model over a rock in a forest.
They have a great selection of glamor models. Even better, while many sites only give you their older photos in smaller, lower resolutions (I'm looking at you Twistys), this site keeps the photos, and the videos, in their original full size and high resolution.
The videos are visually well done and tend to avoid the cheesy music that mar other sites. They tend to be a bit unoriginal though (see "cons" below)
The models are a nice selection of races and ethnicities, although they could do better.
Cons:
They are increasingly relying on older (1980s) photo sets, which probably appeal to a smaller section of their subscribers. Expect to see lots of models with 1980s hair and stockings.
The videos follow a fairly standard pattern that becomes repetitious after awhile. Unfortunately they stopped their series of "Flirt" videos where the girls talked to the camera. I wish they'd bring them back.
They briefly tried a few hard core videos. They were well done and should be continued.
The search function is pretty good to adequate. Seen some better, but have seen many which are worse worse.
I have not come across the deleted content yet, but the "Extreme" material that apparently was removed did not appeal to me. Be aware that some older material is gone now.
Bottom Line:
Great glamor site with hundreds and hundreds of beautiful women. However, it's best days may be behind it. Well worth it if you like to go back and see models that have retired from the business especially as you'll find good high resolution videos and photos whereas other sites will only show you the older, low-res archival files. Keep in mind about 99% is soft-core material so if you want hard core, this is not the site for you.
I have not had the download problems others have complained about. The videos and photos files I have downloaded have done so smoothly and quickly.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Healthy, lovely girls.
A lot of girls.
Beautiful, large photograph.
A lot of photographs.
Cons:
The price is high.
There is no zip the greater part of photographs.
Layout and retrieval function not understood easily.
Bottom Line:
There is a good work in this site.
Girls are healthy and lovely. They are not too thin.
The boobs girl of the imitation is very few.
The photograph is rich in variety, and good.
I wanted more B/G photographs. Moreover, it is a little regrettable that the photograph that exists in one episode is not a large amount of.
I cannot satisfy a lot of photographs of certain without zip.
The movie can obtain only a part of Seventeen video.
As for this, information on TBP is wrong.
The number of DVD that can be completely obtained is 18.
Additionally, a few scenes from among one DVD. However, there is something that ends the scene on the way. Unkindness.
I like B/G movie, a lot of masturbations and G/G movies are dissatisfied.
In the B/G movie, there are a lot of good works.
Teeny hot spots 9, Spicy teens 4, and Sporty teens 4, etc.
I like photograph and movie on this site.
However, a lot of other problems are on this site. It is regrettable.
DL method, retrieval function, and layout, etc.
I hope for them to reform those problems, and to make the price cheap only a little.
I think that more people come to love this site.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Very good looking young females
Many thousands of pictures
Photographers are very good
European females
Really teens
About 100-150 DVDs included (most hardcore)
Quality of DVDs is very good (3MBit DVD quality)
Many updates
Live chat
Cons:
Females in public chat cams are often only "whispering"
Pictures are often softcore
High price
Bottom Line:
I do not know why this site has ranked only 73 on Porn Users. IMHO it is one of the best sites about teens.
Club Seventeen is a site about Holland teens, but I think that they are using teenage (18 years and more) female models from all the Europe. Club Seventeen has many thousands of pictures. Pictures are of very good quality, work of photographers is very good too. Most of pictures are without hardcore action, but IMHO more recent pictures have more of action.
I really liked DVDs on the site. I do not know if it is full access to Seventeen Video, but I have counted from 100 to 150 DVDs available for download. DVDs can be downloaded in scenes, in good DVD quality in 3MBit. Video work is very good, similar to photographer work.
Female models in pictures and DVDs are very good looking. IMHO many are really from 18 to 20 years old.
They also have chat rooms with good looking females for members. I did not like that many of models are only trying to "whisper" to you, so you pay for private chat. I liked how females look in chat room, I did not like that often text in public chat is empty. Models typed, but nothing was shown because they were "whispering" to somebody. It was a problem for me.
I really liked the rest of site and want to recommend it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+All exclusif content.
+All content is dated and they add one new scene per week.
+They started to offer videos in a single file rather than in small clips in 2009. That's about 175 videos out of 469.
+The 185 newer videos are offered in at least 720x408 resolution and they also offer them in 1280x720.
+All the photosets since October 2009 are now offered with a resolution of 2000x1343.
+They hire a good selection of models from most European Countries.
+They now offer Lara latex site with your membership.
+The addition of Lara's site means that you get some lesbian content as well as b/g.
Cons:
-The biggest problem with this site is that they have never considered remastering their older content to at least offer the videos in a single file format rather than in multiple clips.
-Although you now get Lara's site. She does not update very often and the total number of scenes is only 32.
-The performers are only Jim and Lara so you may get tired of seeing only them in the scenes.
Bottom Line:
*I keep returning to this site because they still put out decent suff and I keep hoping that they will remaster their older content. Until they do that then the site will always suffer a lower score than it could get if theyr tried to make some changes. The good news is that you now also get Lara's site included with your membership and that's not bad. Lara is Jim's wife and the person responsible for shooting his scenes in the same way that he's responsible for shooting her's. I wish she would update more often because she is a good performer and she does add some lesbian content which is always nice.
*The site hasn't done any changes since my last review (except adding Lara's site) so I can't really add more info than what's on my previous review. I will only say that Jim is geting older while the models he hires remain at about the same so you are getting an older man with young girls. I guess the same can be said for Lara except that she tends to go for older males and females over younger ones.
I've added a couple of points to my previous score because of the addition of Lara's site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Huge site
- Multiple updates daily
- Great value for video and photo collectors
- Multiple download and streaming options
- Photos available as singles and zips
- TBP discount
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- Mostly non-exclusive
- Model names are often incorrect
Bottom Line:
I can’t really explain why I waited so long to join this mega site but now that I have I wish I had more information. I hope that my comments might make PU reader more informed about what the site has to offer. Club Seventeen is a generic porn site that focuses on young models (18 to early 20s) and covers all of the main porn niches that you’d expect. The site is pretty good but is much better for the casual porn collector rather than the serious porn hoarder like me. I’ll start with the bad news.
I think the biggest drawback to the site is that most, if not all, of the material here is non-exclusive. The vast majority of the models are Eastern European and Russian and having subscribed to many EE/Russian model sites over the years I saw a lot of repeats. This isn't all bad since joining this site gives you access to a lot of porn from other sites so this may be a cost-effective way to get some popular EE/Russian models.
The bad news about joining to get stuff from specific models is that the site seems to pretty much make up model names as they go along. Yes, I know that EE/Russian models change their names more often than American models change their socks but most of the model names here don’t line up with any known aliases for these models. There are several dozen American pornstars on the site too and even they have made up names. So if you’re looking for a specific model you’ll likely be going on facial recognition.
The site offers some ‘bonus’ material from other porn sites. It is clearly identified when it is part of the bonus and the original site is also identified. While it is possible to see this as advertising since you can join the ‘bonus’ site through Club Seventeen you should note that it is more than an ad because you are giving streaming access to those scenes. (It should be noted that Club Seventeen doesn’t use the same trick that Bang Bros is notorious for and when you click on a bonus here you are not deemed to have joined the additional site and have it billed to your card.)
The site has a lot going for it too. For one thing, it’s huge. There are over 3100 models here with almost 5000 videos and almost 8500 photo sets. For the subscription fee (with a great TBP discount, BTW) this is an amazing value for your porn dollars.
The site updates daily with multiple uploads per day. Both videos and photos are added each day.
The site offers a lot for both video and photo collectors. Overall the video quality is better than average. All the newer videos are available to be streamed or downloaded in multiple resolutions, most often in 540p, 720p and 1080p. I downloaded the 1080p videos because the file sizes were reasonable and bitrates for those varied from 12,000 to 8,000 kb/s. Older videos can top out at 1280x720 with bitrates around 5,000 kb/s. The really old videos (the site started in 2000) are mostly 540p but that’s to be expected.
Photos are available as zips and as singles. I don’t collect photos but the newest sets (dating back about a year) are offered with a 2667x4000 resolution. They look great. Older sets are lower resolutions obviously.
One feature I like is that the site shows you the videos and photo sets that will be released over the coming two weeks.
The site allows download managers and I had no problems using IDM. The links didn’t time out quickly. I didn’t find any download limit either and I downloaded 70GB in a day with no issues.
As for a recommendation, the answer is both yes and maybe. I’d definitely recommend a membership here to someone who dabbles in porn collecting. For the casual collector this site offers a huge amount of non-exclusive porn on an easy-to-use site with an amazing discounted price. This is likely one of the best values available. But I think the answer has to be different for the serious porn collector: I think the best I can say is that a serious collector may want to consider joining. The reason I say that for the serious collector is that you may find that you already have a lot of what’s offered here and if you’re trying to add scenes and photos of your favorite models you’ll be frustrated that the names are made up. But even for the serious collector, this is an amazing deal. So count that as a conditional recommendation and if you join you’re at least aware of what you’ll get, and what limitations there are, when you do.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+Vast collection of professional quality pics by Stephen Hicks and his fellow photographers
+Many, many beautiful models from all over
+Some photos in 1600px; first set of each month has 3000px at least from start of 2006
+DDGX subsite offers extra pink, toying, and hardcore
+Returning member price of 15.95 for both DDG and DDGX combined (use same username and password as last time)
+Zip files (but only in largest pic size available)
+Quick model search, but some models have 2 names
Cons:
-Some exclusive, some seen elsewhere (Twistys, Penthouse, etc.)
-Too many categories of pics
-Piece-mealing: “Daily” pics in 1-per-wk segments over 4-6 wks, or “themed” in one gallery with 4 models having about 5 pics each from shoots already or not yet published; DDGX has small sets taken from same shoots as featured galleries
-With “Daily” pics, you never know if max size will be 1024 or higher
-Softcore videos are often boring, overly edited, DRM restricted, and music tracked
Bottom Line:
I’ve been a member many times off and on since 2002. The photography by Mr. Hicks & Co. is usually very professionally done and has signature elements of lighting and color that make it identifiable on sight. For awhile, it was my absolute favorite site.
Actually, though, I’m pretty burned out on it now. Here’s why:
1. All of that piece-mealing of photo content is really annoying!
2. Quite of lot of the “new” content each month as actually older content in larger sizes. (“Seen it before. Find older gallery on hard drive. Replace it?” – over and over again)
3. I’m tired of the inconsistencies in pic sizes and in number of pics per gallery.
4. I’m tired of seeing old, 3rd-party content showing up here, some of which is really mediocre.
5. With truly new content, they just don’t often do the great belly-down-flat and standing ass shots they used to. And that’s the final blow! ;)
At least they’ve toned down their hype. In ’06, they were pasting “3000px” and “exclusive” on their public pages, as if lots of that awaited the would-be subscriber. Glad they’ve cut that crap.
And the good news for photo lovers who have never been is that they’ll be getting better versions of the older content -- and probably won’t even know that they are.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Epoch is not reliable but VirtualXS is better biller
-7 BDSM sites
-The network has over 740 scenes
-Many Eastern European models that are eye candy and perform very well.
-Comes with the ability to create your own clips and playlists
- Comes with a portal site https://www.secretfriends.com/portal/videos over 14, 000 streaming only samples of videos from other sites
-Comes with cam girls section with 8000 models called Club Seventeen Live
-Hands on customer service from the webmaster
-Tag system for searching
Cons:
-Prechecked cross sale on sign up page
-Slow and irregular update schedule. About two or three new scenes a month
-Poor use of scene descriptions
-No trailers in members area.
Bottom Line:
The Submissed network of seven BDSM sites has in total over 740 updates, including bonuses. Within the network nearly every video is available in HD, as well as a photo set for every video.
The sites are:
MachineDom. Mechanized dildo machine fucked women. 43 updates, may not be updating.
BallGagger. Ball gagged dominated women over 98 updates with no schedule, irregular.
HogTiedUp. Women tied up and immobile. Almost an archive site 29 updates, only 1 for 2019.
Subamateur. Submissive dominated amateur women. Archive site and not updating. Has 8 videos.
Boundmenwanked. Femdom handjobs. In all honesty I am not a fan of femdom or male humiliation, so this was a complete surprise. I loved it as the female dom used her man as a sex object and got great pleasure from the handjobs. I think this is a hidden gem of a site and would have joined for this one alone if I had known I would have liked it so much. Over 38 updates, barely a few in 2019.
Femdum where women dominate men with strap on punishment and cock milking. Archive and not updating. 17 updates.
Struggling Babes has over 427 scenes and updates two or three times a month. Recent videos have just a little lesbian or male/ female sex, or in some scenes none at all. Women are powerless and bound and you see light use of floggers, paddles, toys, and Magic Wands. Although I did not recognize many of the models, I saw Antonia Sainz, Ashley Ocean, Cindy Dollar, Delirious Hunter, Eveline Dellai, and British ebony model the beautiful Kayla. I did not know any of these did BDSM scenes. This is the anchor of the network and the reason most members join for.
If you are looking for wild and crazy BDSM scenes with lots of sex, this is not for you. Also true is that if you are a hardcore BDSM fanatic, this is not for you either. The BDSM is not terribly forceful and the subs never get welts. I don’t think it is much more than light pain that never leaves a mark. This is soft by BDSM standards and will not make you uncomfortable or squeamish if you are not a hardcore BDSM fan.
Some of the extras are truly fantastic quality and quantity both. For example you get content from 556 DVDs, a Secret Spinners game, a cam girls site called Club Seventeen Live with 8000 models, a portal site https://www.secretfriends.com/portal/videos with over 14, 000 streaming only samples of videos from other sites, as well as a feature I have only seen on International Media sites.
You can create your own clips and playlists. Often there is a certain part of a video that you like best. Whatever part you prefer, you can select it from the video and save it. This way you can enjoy your favorite parts whenever you want or loop them to play over and over. A single clip can be up to 5 minutes which should be more than enough to get the good parts.
One huge plus is the webmaster is very hands on with customer service, and is helpful even on the weekend. He has told me no problem goes unresolved and is interested in suggestions for the network as well as new scenes or models.
The site navigation is easy to use and there is no advertising on the members pages.
The billers are Epoch as well as Virtual XS. These are very reliable and safe to use. I have used both many times in the past and never had any problems.
Unless you are into much harder BDSM, this network can be an interesting way to enjoy some content that is very different from mainstream porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-There are no download limits.
-The site has easy navigation.
-Eastern European amateur models
-The link to “network sites†is for streaming only samples from other websites. There are 13, 692 in total.
-Updates are about one a week recently.
-Ability to shorten a video and save your own clip of less than five minutes.
-Recent updates can be downloaded in 4K
Cons:
-No PU discount
-Model attractiveness is very much hit and miss.
-No advanced search engine. There are enough tags so that it works reasonably well though.
-The biller is Epoch.
Bottom Line:
The Best Porn reviewed Grandmams at 80 and Rabbits Reviews gave it 78. There have never been any reviews or comments on Pornusers.
The site has an extensive archive of 94 old/younger themed videos. Obviously a bigger archive would be better, but these scenes are in a fairly rare niche. An interesting scene involved an 80 year old woman publicly giving a blow job to a 19 year old guy. Other videos feature gangbangs, threesomes, foursomes and even larger groups, anal, rimming, blow jobs, pegging, domination, and public sex. Most of the models are 60 and older with younger lovers, mostly male but sometimes female. This variety of extreme sexual scenarios makes this site different from others in the old/young niche.
Included with the membership you also get what they call network access. The link is to the portal website SecretFriends.com. The videos are streaming only and there are two sites there that also have an old/young theme. One is GrandparentsX with 19 scenes and the other is Beauty and the Senior with 119 scenes. The links to “network†sites takes you to videos from so many sites that I have to believe that it is intended as advertising for those sites.
Recent downloads are available in 4K and updates are about one a week. So far there have been 34 updates in the seven months of 2019. There are no download limits and the download speeds maxed out my capacity. The site is easy to navigate and there is no advertising on the member’s pages.
The models are Eastern European and I think are amateurs. While I think most are not fantastically beautiful, there are some that I could call attractive. I would expect that the model pool is rather small. How many women of 65 or 70 would do a gangbang or public sex? In all fairness, your opinion of their attractiveness probably makes or breaks your decision to join. I thought the scenes to be entertaining in a fantasy kind of way.
I saw something here that I have never seen on any site ever. You have the ability to shorten a video and save your own clip of less than five minutes. There are 131 user generated clips available for download that other members have made that focus on the important highlights of the videos.
The site lacks a discount through Pornusers, but is worth joining at the regular price.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Decent size archive. There are 123 videos and a photo set of screenshots for each.
-The biller is Epoch.
-Every video is at least HD quality and the most recent are in 4K
-Extremely creative. Some of the most interesting fantasies I have ever seen. Imagine you have a submissive maid who does whatever you want or you are walking in the park and a gorgeous girl notices you and basically rapes you.
-Great editing. I am sure guys this age take a lot longer to cum than in these videos. Barely a wasted moment made it to the final cut.
-The heat may be a testimonial to Viagra, but I think the natural beauty of the women was equally important. There are consistently great looking women. There is hardly a plain one on the entire site.
-There are no download limits or dead links. Everything works-even these old guys!
-The webmaster is very active on Pornusers.
-The link to “network sites†is is for streaming only samples from other websites. There are 13,692 in total.
Cons:
-The guys are often repulsively ugly. However, I like the contrast with the gorgeous females. The fantasy here is that this could be you. If these guys could get these girls to do these things, so could you.
-Updates average three a month. Usually niche sites can do once a week.
-The preview page does not show the high quality of the site. It would work better with trailers.
-No discount through Pornusers.
Bottom Line:
The site Grandadz has been rated at 80 by the Best Porn and 77 by Rabbits Reviews . It has never been reviewed here on Pornusers. However this was listed and reviewed years ago when it was still called “Beauty and the Senior.†As such I reviewed it in 2009 with a score of 90. In those days HD was not available yet. I am very happy that the site is much bigger and a lot better now.
There is plenty to see here with 123 downloadable videos and weak screenshot photosets. There are also 130 non downloadable bonus videos from other sites. The oldest date I saw was for 2012. Every video is at least HD quality and the most recent are in 4K. Some I recognized as on the site in 2009 but now remastered to full HD quality.
Included with the membership you also get what they call network access. The link is to the portal website SecretFriends.com. The videos are streaming only and there are two sites there that also have an old/young theme. One is GrandparentsX with 19 scenes and the other is Grandmams with 88 scenes. The portal lists Beauty and the Senior with 119 videos, which are all available for download on the Granddadz site.
What you get here are great looking Eastern European models with guys that are really old. They advertise them as starting in their fifties, but most look a lot older. While the guys may look old, the girls are not. Mostly in their early twenties, I cannot believe they agreed to do this stuff with these guys.
There is a lot of nude eye candy, a lot, and I also mean a lot of oral. I have not seen one scene that was not mostly blow jobs with oral cum shots inside the girl's mouth. The guys don't jerk into their mouth, the girls suck them off until they cum and they then show it to the camera. These guys I am sure need a lot of oral stimulation from these girls and they do provide it in spades. There is only a small amount of vaginal in each scene, but they all have some. I didn't see any anal though. However, there is some pussy licking as well as rimming by the guys. Some of the scenes have the girls rimming the guy's ass as well.
The fantasies are great. They have so many scenarios, ranging from scenes where the guy is in a park with a young woman and she seduces him, sometimes there is a power imbalance like boss and employee or teacher and student, to others where he innocently is talking to a girl, she finds herself daydreaming about him and just starts to undress him. There are a great many scenes where the woman is the instigator, in fact that seems to be the norm. This can be very hot and imaginative, considering I would never expect this in real life.
The customer service is excellent and the webmaster is active on Pornusers.
As a guy close in age to most of the male performers, it was a truly unique experience to be a member here. I would highly recommend the site to anyone who may find this type of content interesting.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
High quality photos and video. Hot scenes of sexy couples - the women are beautiful (and the guys are too, for the ladies out there)
There’s a range of payment options, and billing is via Epoch or vsxbill; cancelling was easy.
Download speeds are as good as any other site I’ve used.
Cons:
Some of the videos are cross-posted content from other sites, like tasters with links to get you interested – at least one I recall was from SexArt and others from larger sites. These are definitely the minority though, most is original. Some, but not all, of the cross-posted videos are streaming only, but others are downloadable and 1080p just like the original content.
One funny thing is the studio doesn’t seem to be fully soundproofed and must be in the middle of town – every now and then you can hear a truck or something in the background. But it’s in the back and not too much of a distraction.
There’s a “Live Cams” link, which actually just goes to www.secretfriends.com - not so much of a 'con' for me, as I'm not really into cams and typically sign up to sites for the photos or videos; if I want cams, I'll just up direct to a cams site - but every site these days seems to have a cams section/link.
Bottom Line:
I find the idea of “female friendly” or “couples porn” a slightly strange concept. If anything the women I know who like porn are just as keen as any guy on seeing some hard core action, explicit sex and maybe a bit of extra fantasy like threesomes or group sex that wouldn’t be part of their everyday sex life. Looking around at all the content out there these days I’ve realized if anything, my tastes are actually fairly vanilla. I like seeing beautiful females undressing, naked, playing with themselves and having hot sex. And I even get a bit of vicarious pleasure from seeing a guy really enjoying something like a Hegre-art style boner massage. An as it happens, hot women naked and couples enjoying each others bodies is exactly what you get on most “female friendly” porn. Hence why I find the name weird: because “female friendly” porn ticks all the right boxes for this heterosexual male.
“Couples” porn is really just about finding something that tickles both your fancies – and luckily my partner and I have similar tastes and have watched a lot of SexArt, X-Art and other offerings such as Daring Media.
So when I stumbled across SinfulXXX I knew I’d found something right on the money for our tastes. I’m not even sure how I found it. It’s a small site and doesn’t seem to have been around that long. In a one month membership I probably downloaded the whole site. So it’s not huge but I thought I should throw out a review – when I was looking to sign up, there didn’t seem to be any info out there I could find about it
They update once a week – usually with a video and photos from the same shoot. The photos are well done, only one size, but at 4000 x 2667 they have all the resolution you need without taking up too much disk space. The videos are usually around the 20+ minute mark and are shot well, and in 1080p.
Where the site excels is in its “black background with sweaty/oiled bodies” original content. You can see gifs of what I’m talking about on the site’s home page. As is often typical, the videos start with a few minutes of background music/foreplay content, and this build up probably does go on longer than other sites, but then the music drops out and it’s just the sounds of the sex. They’re usually a bit of a slow burn – some long handwork and oral scenes before getting into the penetration. The focus is on slow, prolonged pleasure, and it looks and sounds like the actors are genuinely enjoying it, which is a big turn on for me. There’s some interesting angles in places – e.g. a woman standing with her legs in an A-frame, shot from behind with pussy on full view, but head bent down and slowly but surely working her lips up and down the member of a guy lying on the ground.
Some of the shots, especially during oral scene, are real close up, such as graphic slow segments of women wrapping their mouths around the guy’s members in an almost macro-video style, which is surprisingly hot! (there’s also some examples of this on the gifs playing on the home page as I write this review). Facials are out, but I think every scene I’ve watched ends with the guy pulling out and shooting his load over the woman’s torso or back, or even standing up and coming over her while she’s kneeling or lying on the ground. So there’s no shortage of explicit sex, female orgasms and happy endings for both parties.
The models, including guys, are often familiar faces, e.g. from SexArt or the similar European scene. While the black background with dripping bodies theme is probably my favorite, they do vary the setting – e.g. a “Saints and Sinners” series with content starting a church (starting at least, not the full act right there in the church unfortunately!), or over a dinner table, etc.
It’s a fairly small site: I’ve got 30 videos and 20 folders of photos - approx. 50 GB in total – downloaded after a one month membership, and there were a few more available. For the month I was a member the weekly updates appeared without fail, and really 30 videos of 20+ minutes each is plenty of content for this price – currently 20 euros/month. I do hope they continue and don’t just get bought out by a bigger outfit as I think they’re doing some great, simple content shot really well.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Content appears original
- Fairly easy to navigate
- Can use download manager
Cons:
- Videos poor quality
- Complete vids not available
- Updates very few and far between (doesn't appear to be much new at all)
- Basic design
- Content is poorly directed
Bottom Line:
I have a biased view when it comes to my porn (anyone who doesn't needs professional help imho) and when it comes to sites that rely on pics as much or more than vids it is about the quality and eroticism.
Exhibitionism can be very erotic and not something that has to "hit you in the face" with its bluntness. Unfortunately for UK Flashers, it falls sqaurely into the category of "blunt" in its approach.
Before I get onto the aspects of quantity, I'd like to look at the quality of the content, mostly as it is what is sticking out most to me.
Many of the models are not actually models by trade (yeah, obvious to many that they are working girls, but there are still those out there who believe that they are simply models trying to break into the industry.)
Whilst the models will have a concept of poses etc, a majority of the work and direction is carried out by the photographer. The photographer used for this site appears to have a complete lack of imagination (or interest) and the results are the same poses with the only variation being the location.
As for the poses themselves and the camera angles used? Unflattering on the models to say the very least, amateur in production, completely lacking in eroticism (many are plain seedy.) It's as though a bored 18 year old has gone out with his dad's camera, collared a few girls and led with the direction, "Show us yer gash!" There are user submitted sites out there with more professional content than here!
Harsh? Maybe, but combined with so few updates, a basic and tired design and layout and vid quality from early dsl days, this is a site that I'd struggle to recommend for even half the price that I paid.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU DISOCUNTED MEMBERSHIP PRICE OF $10.51/MONTH RECURRING.
-A HUGE AMOUNT OF CONTENT-PHOTOS AND VIDEOS. CLUB SEVENTEEN HAS BEEN AROUND SINCE 1975, SO IT HAS THOUSANDS OF HARDCORE PHOTOS, THOUSANDS OF VIDEOS, THOUSANDS OF MODELS.
-NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS.
-MOST OF THE OLDER MATERIAL IS FROM CLUB SEVENTEEN. MUCH OF THE NEWER MATERIAL APPEARS TO BE LEASED CONTENT.
YOU ALSO GET BONUS MATERIAL FROM OTHER PAYSITES LIKE NUBILES, METART, ETC.
Cons:
IMPORTANT CONS:
-YOU CAN NOT CHOOSE YOUR USERNAME AND PASSWORD. THEY ARE ASSIGNED TO YOU.
NOTE: THE JOIN PAGES STATE THAT THE LOGIN INFORMATION WILL BE SENT TO YOU BY EMAIL. HOWEVER, THE MEMBERSHIP CONFIRMING EMAIL THAT I RECEIVED, DID NOT SHOW MY LOGIN DETAILS, OR THE MEMBERSHIP PRICING.
SO WRITE DOWN YOUR LOGIN DETAILS AND THE PRICING FROM THE JOIN PAGE.
-NON STANDARD PAYMENT PROCESSOR: IMCBILL.COM. I PREFER CCBILL OR EPOCH, WHICH ARE RELIABLE PROCESSORS.
WHEN CCBILL OR EPOCH SENDS YOU A MEMBERSHIP CONFIRMING EMAIL, THEY INCLUDE YOUR LOGIN DETAILS, AND THE MEMBERSHIP PRICES YOU AGREED TO.
-NON-SECURE LOGIN PAGE.
THERE IS A POP-UP WARNING ON THE LOGIN PAGE (WHERE YOU ENTER YOUR LOGIN DETAILS TO ENTER THE SITE) THAT STATES:
THIS CONNECTION IS NOT SECURE. LOGINS ENTERED HERE COULD BE COMPROMISED.
THEY GIVE YOU A WARNING THAT IF YOU WANT TO ENTER THE MEMBERS AREA, YOU DO SO THROUGH A NON-SECURE PAGE, THAT CAN BE HACKED. FUCK THEM.
CONS CONTINUED BELOW:
Bottom Line:
STANDARD CONS (COMMON TO MANY PORN SITES):
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS SALE ON JOIN PAGE.
-MANY OF THE VIDEOS ARE NON-EXCLUSIVE.
-GENERIC FILE NAMES. HAVE TO MANUALLY RENAME THE DOWNLOADED FILES TO CATEGORIZE THEM.
-CANCELLATION CAN BE A PROBLEM. YOU DON'T GET A CONFIRMING EMAIL ON CANCELLATION, SO CANCELLATION STATUS IS UNCERTAIN.
-NAVIGATION AND SITE STRUCTURE IS BASIC.
YOU GET A LOT OF TINY THUMBNAILS, THAT LOOK LIKE THEY WERE MADE ?IN THE 1980s.
THE THUMBNAILS ARE TINY, AND POOR QUALITY.
-DOWNLOAD SPEEDS ARE OK. 2-3 MB/sec. NOT SLOW, NOT FAST. I NORMALLY GET 3-5 MB/sec AT MANY PORN SITES. MY RATED ISP MAX DOWNLOAD SPEED IS 6.25 MB/sec.
-YOU CAN VIEW THE PHOTOSETS ONLINE IN A SLIDE SHOW. THE INDIVIDUAL PHOTOS ARE PRESENTED SMOOTHLY.
HOWEVER, THE SIZE OF EACH PHOTO ONLY TAKES A SMALL PORTION OF THE COMPUTER SCREEN. SO IT'S MUCH BETTER TO DOWNLOAD THE PHOTOSET ZIP, AND VIEW THE PHOTOS OFFLINE.
BOTTOM LINE:
IT SEEMS THIS SITE HAS BEEN AROUND FOREVER. THEY ADVERTISE THEY'VE BEEN AROUND SINCE 1975.
A TON OF HARDCORE TEEN CONTENT.
FOUR MAIN PORTALS FOR CLUB SEVENTEEN
-CLUB SEVENTEEN (THE MAIN SITE, VIDEOS AND PHOTOSETS)
-SEVENTEEN LIVE (LIVE CAM GIRLS)
-BONUS ARCHIVE(VIDEOS FROM OTHER PAYSITES LIKE NUBILES, METART, ETC.)
-DVD ARCHIVE (DVDs FROM CLUB SEVENTEEN, PLUS OTHER SITES)
-I DON'T WANT TO BE OVERLY CRITICAL. BUT THE PHOTOSETS LOOK LIKE THEY WERE MADE BY AN AMATEUR BACK IN THE 1980s. IF YOU ARE INTO COLLECTING CLASSIC PORN, THE SITE PRESENTS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO DOWNLOAD A BOATLOAD OF VIDEOS AND PHOTOSETS.
BUT THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS AND PHOTOSETS IS POOR, COMPARED TO WHAT IS BEING OFFERED AT MANY COMPETING PORN SITES. CLUB SEVENTEEN IS BEST VIEWED AS AN ARCHIVE SITE THAT HOLDS A HUGE AMOUNT OF LOW QUALITY CONTENT.
THAT IS A SHAME. BUT ALSO AN OPPORTUNITY.
BECAUSE OF THE VAST AMOUNT OF CONTENT OF MODELS FROM YEARS PAST.
I ONLY WISH THE QUALITY WAS BETTER.
THE GIRLS ARE MAINLY CUTE. BUT THE PHOTOS AND VIDEOS ARE LOW-GRADE: CHEAP SETS, AMATEUR-STYLE VIDEOS. THERE ARE MUCH BETTER SITES THAT CATER TO THE EARLY-PORN OF THE 1990S AND EARLY 2000S. WHERE THEY HAVE CUTE GIRLS AND THE PHOTOS ARE MUCH BETTER QUALITY. THE NEWER MATERIAL, LIKE THE VIDEOS, ARE LOW-BUDGET VIDEOS WHERE THE SETS ARE CHEAP, THE CLOTHES ARE CHEAP, THE TYPE OF VIDEOS THAT TEEN MEGA WORLD MADE 10 YEARS AGO AND HAS SINCE MOVED ON TO MORE EXPENSIVE SETS, BETTER CAMERA-WORK, BETTER LIGHTING, MORE ATTENTION PAID TO THE APPEARANCE OF THE MODELS.
THERE ARE FREE TUBE SITES WHERE MOST OF THE VIDEOS ARE HIGHER QUALITY THAN THE VIDEOS AT CLUB SEVENTEEN.
WHICH IS RIDICULOUS. WHY PAY FOR A SITE THAT GIVES YOU LOW-QUALITY PHOTOS AND VIDEOS WHEN YOU CAN GET BETTER QUALITY PHOTOS AND VIDEOS FOR FREE?
HOWEVER, THEY DO HAVE THOUSANDS OF MODELS, MANY OF THEM EXTREMELY CUTE, AND YOU CAN BROWSE THROUGH THE MODEL LISTING TO SEE YOUR OLD FAVORITES HERE, IN GALLERIES AND VIDEOS.
SO, IF YOU'RE NOT EXPECTING HIGH GRADE PHOTOS OR VIDEOS, AND WILL BE SATISFIED WITH A BOATLOAD OF HARDCORE TEEN PORN, CLUB SEVENTEEN MIGHT BE WORTH A ONE-MONTH MEMBERSHIP. OR NOT.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good amount of videos and photosets for the price.
Some HD-videos in very fine quality.
Zip for photos
Ok price
Cons:
Not much new - even some of the updates seems old.
Not all exclusive - quite a few video-sets/photo sets seen elsewhere
Confusing navigation - hard looking for the real updates.
To much content with video-interviews
Bottom Line:
Had a comment resently where I spoke against the quality and non-exclusive updates.
In the "Current Member" and how long - I've cheated. I have not been a steady member for 12 month, but be a member on and off for 12 months and quite a bit more.
Still I get the feeling, that this site has quite a low standard all in all.
The updates and content in general are NOT up-to-date in what you should expect from a site like this - They still live on retro.
The small video-files are sometimes quite sexy, but mostly boring. Nothing new here concerning better filming, better and more sexy scenes and above all: Find some entirely new models - like a lot of the better sites are able to.
Maybe this site was somewhat of a pioneer at one time, but, man - that was a long time ago.
Too bad, 'cause some of the videos are still great - there is just too far between them.
Good that DD has quit DRM, but that's not enough to return a 6th, 7th or 8th time to this site.
And DD, your socalled HD (hardcore extreme) are a laugh - old, non-exclusive and worse - and you can call it "extreme" from here to Kingdom Come - it's still boring and older stuff.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
TBP/PU discount
No regional pricing
Lots of exclusive content
Daily updates
No download limits or DRM
Browse photos online in a choice of up to 5 sizes (800, 1024, 1280, 1600 & 3000px) or view slideshow.
Zip download but only in the largest available size for each set.
Latest videos have 6 download options, H.264 format in HD720p, 480p, 260p and Mobile plus WMV in HD720p and 480p. Streaming also available in high and low quality.
Cons:
Some of these are not really cons for me but may or may not be for others depending on your personal preferences:
Unfamiliar billing processor but no problem with the cancellation process for me.
Content may be too softcore or too artistic for some tastes.
No file sizes listed for zips or video downloads
Those with a slow connection or struggling for disk space might be disappointed at the lack of a zip option for the smaller sized photo sets.
Many of the photo updates are years old recycled sets simply re-released in a larger size. (These photo sets usually have a maximum resolution of 1600px)
The sequence of photos in some sets seems mixed up.
Some non exclusive content.
Bottom Line:
This is the site of glamour photographer J.S.Hicks who has been taking photos of beautiful women since way back in the 80s and whose work has been associated with names such as Playboy and Penthouse. I’ve been a member here a couple of times before but not since 2006 and although I’ve been a big fan of his photography certain issues with the old site such as the DRM and meagre download limits as well as constantly recycling old photo sets as new updates had put me off going back until now when I was tempted back by the special offer price of $9.95 for a month Thankfully the DRM is long gone and I didn’t hit any D/L limits but I did recognise that many of the photo updates are recycled enlarged versions of sets I’ve already downloaded prior to 2006.
Ignoring the recycled sets I did manage to find plenty of new models and content which have been added in the last 5 years since I’ve been away. The site now boasts a collection of over 800 models and I found many of my favourites here including Ariel, Faye Valentine (Reagan), Georgia Jones, Jana Jordan and Shay Laren to name a few. They have a well organised model index where you can easily find all the photos and videos of your favourite models or you can simply browse photos or videos separately and sort them by date order or ranking. The content is also tagged with some of their dozen different category listings such as Dreamgirls, Young & Fresh, Toy Lovers, Girlfriends or Ethnic if you wish to search the content via a specific niche and you can refine your model search within the niche by hair colour, boob size or shaved/bush/landing strip. You can also rate the models and create a favourites list.
The photos here have more of an artistic feel to them than your usual glamour site often making use of natural light and shadows to create some dramatic effects. Also they don’t go overboard with the airbrushing so the pictures tend to have a more natural feel to them than the artificial looking glossy pics you get at some glamour sites. Overall I was highly impressed with the quality of the 3000px photo sets. The only slightly annoying thing for me was that sometimes the sequence of pictures seems muddled and doesn’t always run in the expected order from clothed to naked. A prime example of this is the July 1st update of Malena Morgan, she starts off wearing a sexy white see through lace dress with matching bra and panties underneath, picture 27 the dress is off and she’s removing the bra, pic 29 the bra and dress are back on again. Pictures 52 and 53 she’s almost naked and removing her panties, pics 54 and 55 the bra, panties and dress are back on again. Is this the deliberate intention of the photographer? Surely not?….or is it just laziness on the part of the webmaster not ensuring the photos are uploaded in the correct order?
The site also has a collection of 787 videos to date, 407 of which come with an HD option. When searching the video library you are able to check a box to include only HD videos in your results if you so wish. Most of the videos I’ve watched so far range from around 8-12 minutes in length and usually feature the model in a slow sensuous striptease accompanied by music followed by masturbation session. As the model begins to pleasure herself the music fades away so you can hear her moans and groans. You can also find some videos featuring sex toy use and some girl/girl videos although these are in the minority here. The 1280x720 wmv option I chose had a bitrate of around 3400kbps. On average 8-9 new videos added per month as part of the daily updates.
Extra features include the Daily Word, over a thousand desktop wallpapers, backstage features, talent search, forum and a Twitter feed. Overall a highly recommended site for fans of solo glamour photography especially if you can grab one of their special join offers. If I go back in another 5 years I wonder if they will be recycling all those 3000px photos I just downloaded in a bigger size again?
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
