Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Digital Desire

Digital Desire (1)

Denner (235) 12-09-07  09:07am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (77), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Good amount of videos and photosets for the price.
Some HD-videos in very fine quality.
Zip for photos
Ok price
Cons: Not much new - even some of the updates seems old.
Not all exclusive - quite a few video-sets/photo sets seen elsewhere
Confusing navigation - hard looking for the real updates.
To much content with video-interviews
Bottom Line: Had a comment resently where I spoke against the quality and non-exclusive updates.
In the "Current Member" and how long - I've cheated. I have not been a steady member for 12 month, but be a member on and off for 12 months and quite a bit more.
Still I get the feeling, that this site has quite a low standard all in all.
The updates and content in general are NOT up-to-date in what you should expect from a site like this - They still live on retro.
The small video-files are sometimes quite sexy, but mostly boring. Nothing new here concerning better filming, better and more sexy scenes and above all: Find some entirely new models - like a lot of the better sites are able to.
Maybe this site was somewhat of a pioneer at one time, but, man - that was a long time ago.
Too bad, 'cause some of the videos are still great - there is just too far between them.
Good that DD has quit DRM, but that's not enough to return a 6th, 7th or 8th time to this site.
And DD, your socalled HD (hardcore extreme) are a laugh - old, non-exclusive and worse - and you can call it "extreme" from here to Kingdom Come - it's still boring and older stuff.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Drooler (220) Good review Denner. I don't get why you've been given 99 points instead of the 100 (i.e., 2 pts for this review), so you can graduate cum laude with the Hardcore User badge. It's a hellava lot better than the average review here.

I think what's lacking at this site is the spark of excitement. The girls are lovely but they pose as directed and are shot from the photographer's POV. I just saw Jamie Lynn's latest at DD, and it was just another disappointment! It could have been a real sweetie, 'cause I've seen her turn on the charm before. But these gets have the girls looking down, looking away, keeping their eyes closed, being too detached. 3000px don't matter then!

And there's not enough good ass either. At least the very recent redux of Phoenix Ray had a nice one of her in a futt-buck pose, now at 1600px. And she was alive enough before the camera. Doesn't happen nearly enough at this site.

12-09-07  10:47am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :

Well, Drooler
Tha Admin at PU did not find it great, just GOOD, according to a reply from Khan.
So I live with 99 for the time beeing.

Congrat. with the new HD badge - I'll come after it, I think -but for a period I'll be out on the road....


12-11-07  10:13am

Reply To Message


zachvenice (19)
Sorry to hear that you weren't completely satisfied with our site, Denner. I would only like to add that we do not boast ourselves as being a hardcore site. And even though some of our sets are from our archives (we have been shooting for over 20 years), we focus on quality rather than quantity. We shoot only the best models and take time to produce exquisite images. Nonetheless, atleast half of our monthly updates are new and exclusive. If you check out our tour, you'll see we have nothing to hide.
04-23-08  02:36pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.