Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Digital Desire

Digital Desire (2)

Newbie
79*
Hooliganzo (4) 11-30-12  10:46pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 12-01-12  02:09am  (Update History)
Reason: Ran into another con.
Pros: -2000x3000 resolution on latest photo sets
-Around 720 of those photosets are 3000px.
-Around 540 720p videos
-Interview videos
-updates once a day video every 5th update.
-Low price
Cons: -Older sets 1600x1024 or under.
-Around 1900 of the photosets are 1600px or under.
-Around 500 videos are 420p.
-Videos have music.
-Majority of pictures are in the outdoors with natural lighting which I'm not a fan of but is personal taste
-Video links expire when using download manager. Makes downloading videos exponentially time consuming.
Bottom Line: Based on the latest 3000px photos, technically the photo sets are well shot and composed. Personally I'm not a fan of the lighting. Most photosets are outdoors and most of the indoor sets have natural lighting from outside through the window. This might be a plus for some but for me it is not my style. I prefer the controlled lighting and indoor scenes.

Based on the latest 720p videos, the videos have a hazy dream sequence look to them. The videos have a music track to them. Both of which are not my style. Aside from that there are interviews with some of the models which are always a plus.

Search is done by broad categories hair color, breast type, shaved/unshaved, styles(wet,girlfriends, backstage, xxx stars etc). You can organize sets by publishing date or rating. There is also a checkbox for hd only so you only see 720p videos.

The models are more playboyesque type of models and they are photographed in that style. If you are looking for this style then this site is worth a try for the price offered. If you are looking for the amateur girl next door style this is not it. Whether or not you like this site depends on what style you like.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

tangub (151) Good review Hooliganzo, can't really disagree with anything you wrote there. Personally I love their style of photography with the natural light and it's a site i'm likely to return to time and time again as long as it stays at the great value for money price of $10.
12-02-12  01:43am

Reply To Message

2

Cybertoad (104)

Really nice review keep up the good work.

12-03-12  12:56pm

Reply To Message

3

gaypornolover (38) Very good first review have added you to Trust List and hope you stick around!
12-03-12  03:32pm

Reply To Message

4

fuzzyham (0) From a value-per-dollar perspective, this is one of my favorite sites. I love the videos. Well shot and the girls look comfortable and relaxed and really seem to be enjoying themselves. The pics are good from a quality perspective but I don't like the format the thumbnails are presented in. I also don't like that the pics and videos are mixed together and are not in date order when you look at a models portfolio. I do like that when I emailed them to suggest some layout changes that they replied the next day saying that they would investigate. Nothing happened, so I'm not sure they really took a serious look but at least they responded.
I always download from this site using FireFox with a download manager and have never had any problems.

12-31-12  12:08pm

Reply To Message

5

Hooliganzo (4) REPLY TO #4 - fuzzyham :

The zipped picture sets downloaded for me fine with the a Download manager but the videos did not. Probably more to do with expiring links then the download manager itself. My guess is that if a link is not actively downloading it expires within the minute. So queuing videos up for download in the download manager would not be possible.

I had to download each video one by one without queuing them. When I try queuing the downloads, the first video and then stop downloading when it got to the second.

12-31-12  10:43pm

Reply To Message

6

fuzzyham (0) REPLY TO #5 - Hooliganzo :

If by queuing you mean setting them up so that when one finishes the next one starts, I've never tried this. I usually do one at a time. However, if I start one, then start another, then they will run concurrently without problems. I'm using a FireFox add-in called DownThemAll! Works great. I'll try the queue thing sometime and let you know.
Happy New Year.

01-01-13  07:27am

Reply To Message

7

Hooliganzo (4) REPLY TO #6 - fuzzyham :

Yes, that is what I meant. I do use Downthemall. The reason I queue up downloads is because I don't want to be at my computer trying to manually download each file one at a time waiting for the the previous file to finish.

What you describe supports my theory that video download links expire if they are not actively used. So concurrent downloads would work but not queued up links that remain inactive until the previous download is finished.

The Problem with Concurrent downloads is that I don't want dozens of files downloading at the same time at a couple of kilobytes a second which takes longer to view anything. I like to download them in queue and watching them as the finish downloading.

01-02-13  11:39am

Reply To Message

8

fuzzyham (0) REPLY TO #7 - Hooliganzo :

Just tried it and it seemed to work ok for me. I started one video and made sure it was running. I then queued up a second video and made sure it was not running. When the first video finished (elapse time approx 20 minutes), the second video started up right away.

In the Network tab of the DownThemAll preferences, my settings are:

Concurrent Downloads - set to 1 (Set this way just for the test)
Automatic retries - set to 5 min (I think this is the default)
Max. Retries - set to 10 (set this way for the test)

Couldn't find much in the way of help on-line for these settings, but what may be happening is this: If your auto-retries and max-retries expire before the first video ends, it may not start the second video. Don't know how long it takes you to download a video but try setting those 2 switches so they exceed that time frame. Also, there is a menu option (and hot-key combo) to force start a video, which may be another option (just right-click the video you want to start). I may have time to test my theory but not for a while, so give what I suggest a try and let me know.

01-03-13  06:21am

Reply To Message

9

Hooliganzo (4) REPLY TO #8 - fuzzyham :

They may have changed it. I can't verify since my subscription expired more than a month ago.

When I was subscribed I did try and resume the failed downloads and they did not start. It only initiated when I went back to the site and added the link to the queue fresh from the website.

I would give the site 1 more point to my score if they did fix that issue.

01-03-13  12:09pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.