Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- very nice models, many new faces.
- almost 500 videos in many niches including anal, deviations (bondage/peeing, etc), lesbian, and hardcore. Quality of videos ranges from 320 x200 to HD. Different formats including ipod are available, although more options such as mov or mp4 would have been nice
- around 553 photos in a large variety of niches. Images range in between 1600px × 1067px (newer ones especially) and 600px × 800px (older ones). Zipped galleries available
- exclusive content.
- good-ish download speeds (around 200kb for 4 videos) and the whole canceling/ customer service experience was great. E-mailed them about a password issue and it got fixed within a day.
-nice forum
Cons:
- navigation and downloads were a bit slow. Nothing unacceptable, but better speed would be nice.
- some of the older content is really disappointing blurry images and fuzzy videos are sad compared to the high quality more recent stuff.
- some girls don't really seem into it, which I guess is more of a subjective issue, for me it was a bit disappointing.
Bottom Line:
Overall this site was a nice experience. It's an American site that offers a lot of young girls in many varied scenes, somewhat similar to Euro/Russian sites like tryteens.com and teensexmovs.com. However customer support is superior to those sites and the bonus features like the active forum and the confession/interview videos make this site stand out as more than just a clone of a Russian network.
I would recommend it to anyone out there who has seen what most teen sites have to offer and want more new faces in the same niche (slender bodies, young faces and small tits). Also many of the scenes involve very innocent looking girls in some very hot hardcore action (they still have more photos than videos and more solo than boy/girl but the updates are relatively regular and of good quality).
The nice thing is that unlike many Russian sites you can be certain that you won't have trouble canceling or contacting the webmaster; even more the content is exclusive so you won't see the same scene again and again. Also there are some great quality bondage scenes, unlike many other sites.
Overall I would recommend this site wholeheartedly to anyone into teens. The large amount of content guarantees it that you will find something you like.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Epoch.
-Very original and creative concept of mixing realistic competitive nude wrestling with lesbian sex.
-Videos as good as 1280x720, 7158 kbps. Advertised as HD and very crisp.
-298 hour long videos. The archive goes back to August 2004.
-Streaming available. There are four download options-HD WMV, WMV, MP4 and Ipod.
-No DRM or download restrictions. I downloaded most of the site in one day with no problems.
-Download manager friendly.
-Updates are five times a month.
-Photo sets for each video. Zipdownloadable, both high and low resolution, about 200 per set. 1200x675, but fairly sharp.
Cons:
-Not part of any network. All kink.com sites are priced individually, but there is a discounted price for second and more websites joined at the same time.
-Only occasionally clear explicit nudity. The videos mostly are shot from too far away with no closeups.
-The penalty of getting fucked with a dildo is not much of an incentive to avoid losing. Try to imagine if you were wrestling and the penalty was a handjob. Would you try hard to avoid such a fate? In the post scene interviews the girls sometimes mention how much they enjoyed the fucking they got. One girl had a big smile and said she is in love. She went further to say she wouldn't mind a repeat as long as she loses.
Bottom Line:
I knew it was a long time since I was last a member, but I did not realize it was three years. The site has dramatically changed for the better in that time.
The most obvious change is growth. With five updates a month, there is a lot to see here. Next, there are now fine quality HD videos. This is a distinct improvement as some of the oldest videos are not up to today's standards. Additionally many of the older videos have been recoded and play much better than they did years ago.
Another area of improvement is in the quality of the girls. In the beginning, many of the better wrestlers had that look that is the stereotype of lesbians-short hair with tattoos, mean and tough looking. In essence they were not sexy unless that is specifically your taste and I doubt most guys would prefer that look. My how things have changed. Mostly the girls are much sexier than in the past. Many are pornstars, with the looks and bodies that most guys like(I can't speak for lesbians who may like this kind of site).
Another change is that anal scenes have become much more common. About 25 feature anal. Since many scenes are very similar I feel that adds some variety.
There are also many more videos where the matches are more even. In the past most scenes had a weak wrestler being paired with a much better one. Too predictable for my taste. Now, some of the girls beat others of equal proficiency level. It is boring to never get to see a girl you like to win, or to lose for that matter.
The biggest change for the better is that there are many tag team scenes. When last I was a member, there were none. Now there are 26. Recently these scenes are being filmed in front of a live audience that reacts to the action and occasionally interacts, but only to a small degree. The tag team concept gives the weaker girls a chance to go after the better ones with some pussy fingering, pussy rubbing etc.
The action is much more about wrestling than it is about lesbian sex, but that is my only real criticism. That is the niche that the site has chosen, so it really does deliver what it promises. Overall recommended, but not necessarily the sexiest site you have ever seen.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Women wrestling, clothed, partially clothed and nude. One of Kink's oldest sites.
- Has more content than I'll ever get to.
- Tag team live matches in front of a crowd are some of my favorite scenes in all of pornland.
- Working Isis Love in as ref and extra strap-on is a great idea. I could just watch her walk around.
- Scripted and non-scripted are very subjective words, but I will give them credit for being the most physical of the wrestling sites.
- Nice photo sets, but see the cons and BL for more on this.
- Download speeds are usually extremely good, but there was one day of 1/20th regular download speed and just today the site had a few maintenance issues.
- Dragon Lily. It's not just a site with her on it, but she's a real star here. One of the sexiest, curvy, Asian/Pacific Islander models I've ever seen.
- Get a discount to most of their other sites while a member, believe it's $19.95 on each one you add.
Cons:
- Site design. This doesn't just apply to Ultimate Surrender, but most of the Kink sites I've been on. Have a membership to two right now and both suffer from the same problems.
- Trying to find a balance. I've competed in martial arts, Greco Roman wrestling and mixed martial arts. Dragon Lily really stands out here because she seems to be very skilled in grappling and flexibility. The combination of athleticism and sexy is perfect with her. A lot of the matches end up being more like foreplay for a lesbian porn scene.
- And those mutli-zip photo sets. There is a reason and defined reason for this, round 1, round 2, round 3, round 4, but each one is only 10-20 MB and requires multiple clicks to download each. I have a round downloaded before I can get back and start another round's zips downloading.
Bottom Line:
I like Kink sites as a diversion for me. I've almost always liked only glam sites, solo sites, but Kink has me convinced they are "good guys" when it comes to hard, dominating sex and they are perfect for me when I start getting bored with the softer porn.
I do stay frustrated with the site design and the way the photo zips work. Kink does listen so I'm hoping they at least will consider this. To download one match's photos you have to go through this process, click on photos, click on which round, there are 4 rounds in each match, click on download zip, back click, click on round 2, click download, back click, click on round 3, click on download, back click, click on round 4, click download, back click. That's 12 clicks to get one full match's photos. If I'm wrong for complaining about that have Dragon Lily and Isis Love punish me!
This click-a-thon does make the photo sets less appealing to me. Maybe put a full set download link? Or how about even a little zip icon beside each round? Full set would allow one click downloading. Zip icon beside each would be 4 clicks. I could put up with 4, but 12 is just frustrating. Though not applying directly to this site, I've also seen other Kink sites using this multiple click per photo set download.
The site itself is believable to a point. Some of the girls look like they are giving their all to win a match, others look like they just want to lose and have sex. Dragon Lily, Isis Love are both very competitive in it and both are also funny. Sorry Lily, but you telling a woman, "You cannot cum yet" is funny to me and strangely, kind of cute.
The live matches are the standouts. These do seem to be a little less realistic from a competitive view, because they allow double teams, which are always fun. I won't criticize the site for being scripted though. Girls do get injured. Some matches stopped because of injury even.
Where the site succeeds the most. Quality, quantity and hard lesbian sex. I have always had problems watching the harder boy/girl scenes with slapping, but it's pretty hot when it's two sweating, naked women. I do now understand the scoring better than I did on my last review of this site and can see how they are trying to create a real athletic competition with erotic additions.
Video quality can be varied and confusing, which goes back to site design. These are the options on newer ones, Most Compatible (wmv), Highest Quality HD (mp4), Smaller Screens iPod, iPad (mp4), Windows Media HD (wmv). Some of the times, I have downloaded the most compatible option and gotten mid level wmv files in the 720x480 range. So I finally just selected Highest Quality mp4 and it will remember that from scene to scene, but because the site has so much content on it, some of the scenes highest quality mp4 is 640x360. That can be frustrating since on those, the wmv is usually 720x480. It would probably be way too much of a pain to list the resolution beside of each, but it should be mentioned since you have to check each file to see if you got the best quality one available for that scene.
Search could be improved. If you go to "All Seasons" there are 8 listed previous seasons, but they have started season 10. Most of all though, I would love to see an option to just select the live scenes, but it's not here unless I'm overlooking something. I instead go through the updates looking for ones I can see a crowd in. Sounds easy enough, but each page only lists 7 shoots and the live ones are released by round, so you have to dig even more to find the full live scenes and if you want the pictures to those, it's back to looking for each round. Why the full scene video download doesn't have a full scene photo zip download doesn't make much sense.
The Kink sites I have been on all have these different problems with photo sets being split up to maybe tell a story or make sure if you're not OCDC, you will be. The design and frustration has lowered my score from a 90 a few years ago, but if you're not interested in the photos, the score would be in the lower 90s.
Using my most basic method of figuring up how much content, I'm going to multiply the number of pages of updates multiplied by how many scenes per page. There are 84 pages of updates, 7 scenes per page, so that's 588, but the live ones are split, so the number isn't that high. The site has updates dating back to 2004, they update every week.
The live scenes are what brings me back though. Having Isis being more active as a ref, joining in the sex part has really helped the site. Her performance as an unknowing spectator in one live scene is my personal favorite scene of my porn collection.
It's different, it's the hardest lesbian content I've found and it even has some genuine laughs in it. Once you get beyond the site design problems and search issues, you have one of the most original sites on the internet. Recommended to those who are looking for something different and lesbian fans.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-nice selection of models
-variety in sets (bedroom,livingroom,etc etc)
-Most of the sets feature anal sex
-fairly large selection of movies
-video quality on newer vids is good
-dominate/submissive type scenes
Cons:
-some of the models don't use the strapon that well
- more or less the same femdom scenarios per scene
- each scene could do with screencaps
- not enough variety in the positions or dildo size
- not everyone is a fan of submissive/dom sex
Bottom Line:
this is a pretty good strapon site, in that it's movies are exclusive and not ripped from DVDs, and that the models are all pretty hot and there are some good pairing ups. unfortunately though allot of the models aren't that good at using the strapon, and don't give that hard of a fucking to the other girl, and usually the positions are the same, no kinky or hard pounding postions for the most part.
There's plenty of anal which is great to see, and the quality/resolution of the vids (the newer ones) are great. Bottom line, if you like anal strap on sex with a femdom edge to it, you'll most likely love the site.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Lesbian from india oh! is it real or is it fake but after looking this site things change. Now i know how much indian porn get familiar with western world. But girls from indian dont kno how to act in lesbian action.
Membership to lesbian from india gives you access to not only 1 site but an entire network of premium porn sites including 45 exclusive reality sites, 110 bonus sites 4100 DVDs and over 15000 movies.
- 10 Video run time around 30 min.
- video ok to accept.
- easy browsing
- small to full length available
* Authentic Indian Girl * real plus point of this site not latin girls named as indian girls.
Cons:
Very few stuff available only 10 videos.
- bad resolution
- high res video missing
- high rs images missing
- VHS transfed to digital
- instead of indian stuff showing more white hardcore stuff + showing datign and macthing stuff
- for only 10 indian video i cant pay 29$ + trial fee.
- Trial is restricted agian
- its network site of one site i already reviewed.
- Promoting other site inside members area asking for more money. Bad
- The quality of the DVD movies was not great, in most of them the camera work was extremely shaky, while the picture quality was below average
Bottom Line:
please get more stuff its agian not exclsuive as you mentioned in site. There are site available showing more stuff than your. please reduce price and make video or shot video with HD camera easily available in market and at cheap price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1)Price is good compared to other sites I have belonged to.
2)Originality is its best suit. You are allowed to use your imagination.
3)I take snap shoots of my work and the size and quality are good.
Cons:
1)Learning to use the system. Actually doing the scenes is very easy. It is just creating the initial characters that can be cumbersome.
2)You also need to down load the game and you require a good graphics system. If you don't play games with your computer you may have to purchase the a good graphics card and software. So that is more cost.
Bottom Line:
3D Lesbians was a new idea to me. You are not subscribing to a site that has 1,00's of photo sets or HD videos to look at.
What you get is a very good 3D system that allows you to create your own photo or video scenes.
You are initially given three models. One model is yourself, Maya. The second is your partner, Cindy. A third may be added if you want threesomes. As you play and get your partner to orgasm you get coins. More orgasms more coins. You take these coins and buy sets like an office or motel room. There are an assortment of toys and extra outfits. And you may buy new models if you get tired of banging the same old Cindy.
So as you play and make Cindy orgasm and you get coins that you use them to buy items to increase the range of your fantasies.
You may alter any model. Change hair style and color. Breast size and shape. You decide what makeup she will have. So you may want one model to be 27 with long black hair and another to be 20 with blond hair and pigtails.
There are different personality traits. Your models may be romantic, dominant and the list goes on. For each of these variables there is a directory to save them. Save them!
This is work. You are the creator of your own porn movie. So for those who complain about bad camera angles and effects this is your chance to learn what it takes.
Now you pick a set and start the scene. Typically you will have to alter the costumes after you start. The system likes to use the costumes given with the set. Just hit the arrow in the top right corner that brings up the models and pull up the outfits you saved and load them on your models. Now return to the set and start the creating your fantasy. Pick a pose and use your mouse to aim your camera. There is a tutorial for using the camera, so I won't get into that. Choose another pose. This is your scene. Use your imagination to create what you want. This is what this site is all about. Your chance to create your own fantasies.
Bottom Line: If you are tired of sites that have one bedroom scene after another then this is where you control what you would like to see. Of course there are limits. The models do not get up and change positions. The scene jumps from one pose to the next. You do not get to watch them remove their clothes. You pick the model, a window opens and you may choose to remove or add a garment. But when you are done you will have a set of photos that follow the progression of the scene you imagined. I could not cover everything here. But you will learn. If you want to try your creative juices then here's your chance.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Excellent value for money;
Beautiful, (yet natural) models;
High-quality videos and still photography;
Excellent customer support.
Cons:
Site layout is slightly dated - but that's just me being a little picky.
Bottom Line:
This is, quite simply, a brilliant pay-site. From my experience Abby Winters offers by far the sexiest action on the web. Don't expect plastic, pancake-makeup Barbie-fake models here - these girls are REAL, and they are obviously (VERY OBVIOUSLY, judging by the noises they're making on the vids) - having a really great time... And so will you if you subscribe - especially any ladies out there...
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Really interested, perky, even dare I say sweet models
- Great TBP price, which I'm starting to take as a sign of confidence from the site that gives the discount!
- Some of the models are very cute, and again, they have personalities that show
- The quality on videos and pics are both well above average
- My wife likes it better than I do! Hint there to you men who have wifes that like porn, very normal, down to earth models on here, so wife has no reason to be insecure!
Cons:
- Anyone who has read my reviews knows this site is not my usual join, the amateur sites just don't do it for me.
- I feel bad about saying this, but I'm trying to be honest, I only found maybe 35% of the models attractive
Bottom Line:
I probably should have let my wife write this review. First of all, if you like amateurs, no overly done beauty makeovers, nothing really extravagent, just your average girls that you could speak to in any city across the world, this is an excellent site!
My wife loves the site. I told her to let it cancel for a month, so I can check out some new sites. I won out, but will be back again in a month or two. Having grown up in a city that is based on glamour, image, I never really knew many just normal girls, so I guess that effects me and my perception of this site. I actually bumped the score up since I'm taking my wife's view of the site into account.
I don't require a woman to be shaven in the pubic area, but I personally can't get into women who don't even trim.
I know this may sound crazy, and probably goes against what the site is about, but I would just like to throw this out there. Is it possible that the site might throw in a really gorgeous woman for one of the average women to maybe seduce? I'd sign up for a year for that! My complaints are just some personal issues with hygeine, I'm one of those over-reacting germ people.
I will recommend it as highly as possible, it really is a great site that I wish the "pro" sites would take notes from. But if you are into glam like I am, I'd still say try it out, it has a charm about it. Just don't expect to see the big name actresses, but don't be surprised that some of these cute girls get your attention!
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is a well organised site, very user-friendly with loads of information available to members. Customer support, unlike many other sites, is superb. When I had a log-in problem it was resolved immediately. Images are good quality and video excellent-if you choose the higher resolution. There is a huge archive which is well worth searching as the best stuff is now quite old. They used to have some gorgeous models who were carefully paired for their compatability and this worked very well. I would say most of the amateur models appearing on the site are heterosexual or 'Bi' and this makes for more interesting video as they are still experimenting with same sex experiences. There is only one obvious dyke involved as far as I could see, and she is a member of the staff. A few of the better looking models regularly return to the site, but there is a constant turnover as they move on to other things. You never know when logging on if a real stunner is going to turn up.
Cons:
Unfortunately it seems the good times are over for this site. They do not seem able to find attractive models like they used to. There are a few exceptions of course, but most of their recent models are distinctly ordinary. I used to look forward to the daily updates which usually featured exiting and sexy new girls, but nowadays I very often don't even bother to open the image set or video having seen the header picture. They insist on sticking to the same old format month after month and this becomes tedious after a while. Their 'Intimate Moments'(solo or 2 girl masturbation) videos were an exciting inovation several years ago but are now stale and boring. The girl on girl videos, whilst often very good depending on the attractiveness of the girls, tend to be too 'staged', ie.two girls, very lightly clothed, kneeling on a bed waiting to start a sex session for the cameras. Not exactly spontaneous! Any suggestions for improvement by the members seem to fall on deaf ears.
Bottom Line:
Their big mistake was splitting the site into three parts, no doubt to increase their income. This meant they had to increase output at the expense of quality and use models which previously they wouldn't have entertained. Staff appear to have become complacent and need to bring in new blood with imagination and drive to 'kick some ass'. It's not too late!
A unique aspect of this site however is the surprisingly busy forum or message boards, which are split into several subject headings with lots of threads running in each section. This sounds like a good thing until you realise that these boards are dominated by a handful of strange characters who appear to devote all their spare time to the site and seem to be involved in just about every thread. They are totally sychophantic and heap praise on everything on the site. Some of the slush they write to the models is quite nauseating and must be embarrassing for those of the girls who read the boards. They take it upon themselves to welcome new members to the boards, then dictate to others what they may or may not say in their posts. (WE do this and WE do that). If you dare to post the slightest criticism of the site they will immediately jump to its defence and take the thread off topic to lose your post. One of these characters posts a weird review of just about every update, rambling about the wonderful lighting, composition and colours, then goes on to thank each member of staff involved by name. These must be very sad people and the phrase 'get a life' springs to mind. If the management could put a stop to all this nonsense and listen to the more sensible members, the site could be put back on track and returned to its position as the leading site of its genre.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge variety of "real" amateurs
Nice variations in locations and style
Girls have personality
Great Picture and Video Quality (HD)
Huge Collection
Nice community feel to the site
Girls start fully clothed and strip to nude
Regular updates
Cons:
The only thing I find frustrating is that often the models often do not dress sexily enough.
I don't think that the models should 'Glam Up', but it would be nice to see the girls stripping out of work outfits,nightclub or dinner party outfits and wearing more sexy underwear. After all, this is still real life clothing. There is too much TShirt\Shorts and cotton underwear for my liking. Many models have multiple shoots so I think the site could add this variety and still maintain its amateur feel, in fact I think it would enhance it.
Bottom Line:
In my opinion, Abbywinters is quite simply the best site on the net for shoots of real amateur girls.
What I love about the site is the great variety in models and shoot locations and style.
No other site does it better. Other 'amateur sites' e.g Karup, Amkingdom have wave after wave of similar looking semi-pro models with the shoots all looking similar and with little personality whereas with abby you really feel like you are browsing the girl next door in her own environment rather than a procession of models with lap-dancers figures.
The models also all look like they are all enjoying themsleves and this makes a big difference, the site has a great community feel to it.
The photoshoots are great with the girls starting off fully clothed and then stripping to full nudity. Some shoots are softcore and some explicit and this must simply depend on how confident the model is.
The videos follow a similar vein with the model chatting for a while and then undressing and perhaps getting explicit.
The girl/girl shoots are great although I have noticed that these seem to be less prolofic recently.
Abbywinters has come in for a lot of critisism recently and I think a lot of it is unfair. True, I did notice myself that the site become a little more softcore and there seemed to be a larger amount of outdoor shoots but having said that I still preferred it to any other site of its type on the net. It's still way ahead of its closest copycat sites.
I certainly did not notice that the models were any less attractive as some people have mentioned. This of course is subjective so I am not undermining other people's opinions. Part of abbys appeal is the variety of its material so there are bound to be fluctuations around peoples personal tastes.
For me this site right now is as good as it has ever been, in fact you have to say it is better considering the advances in picture and video quality.
The picture and video quality is terrific and the HD videos compare favourably with any on the net. My only critisism on some videos is that the girls can spend too long chatting and only get fully nude in the last 10% of the video. I'm sure another user though would say they enjoyed this for the 'tease' factor though :-)
If you are looking for babe after babe then try sites like Karup or AmKingdom or one of the many european magazine style sites but if you are after more realistic
Bottom line is that I would heartily recommend this site for anybody looking for real next door type models. You won't be disappointed.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Unusual niche.
-Very attractive women for the most part.
-Sexy English accents.
-Nice quality videos. The most recent are 960x540, 4068 kbps. Not HD but sharp. Even the older videos are quite watchable.
Cons:
-Some fake boobs and or tattoos.
-Poor acting, not very realistic fights.
-The dull photos don't do justice to the action. They are zipdownloadable, but only 960x1440.
Bottom Line:
This is an unusual niche, so felt I had to cut it some slack regarding my score. Although there are a few other female fighting sites, few are any good.
In these videos we see British pornstars and nude models fight with each other. In many cases, they start off nude. In others there is a bit of clothing that comes off by the end of the fight. I liked these better.
The fighting is hesitant and definitely tentative. In only a few cases do these models really get into the spirit and show some real enthusiasm. Sometimes the action is so transparently not real that it would make a WWE wrestler blush-and that is not easy.
At about five minutes per video, I felt that they were long enough. Many of the videos were so similar that I thought that I had seen them before. Not true, its just that there isn't much variety in the plots.
The true plus here is the quality of the models. With cute English accents, they generally are quite pretty with bodies that make you forget about the negatives to the site.
My feeling is that the site is worthwhile if you enjoy topless,some full nudity, and almost no cases of lesbian sex. If you want more, Ultimate Surrender is a much better site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill.
-64 half hour long videos, WMV 720x540 2550kbps. Streaming and download options, but only whole clip.
-Has 960x540 screenshots available for almost every video.
-No DRM or download restrictions.
-Can use Download Acclerator Plus, but not Flashget or Free Download Manager.
-Simple navigation. Videos are listed by date with a screenshot, or you can click on a different link to search by star.
-Updates once a week.
-Part of a small network of three lesbian sites.
Cons:
-Only two download options, high and medium quality. Only WMV available.
-Screenshots are not zipdownloadable.
-Many of the videos are gonzo style with either no plot or it is minimal.
-Well known black pornstars which means most of the girls have too much makeup, many have fake boobs, too much artificial moaning that simply sounds fake. Most are not really into the sex.
-Probably not much exclusive material. Some I have seen before, or I have seen the set used in similar videos.
Bottom Line:
In spite of the fact that the sex was mostly uninspired, by the numbers gonzo with well known stars, I enjoyed the videos. Scenes like this are not easy to find in any quantity, let alone a whole site. I believe it may even be unique on the net, as I don't know of another site that focuses on black women. In all fairness though, there are similar DVD's. Much of the sex is somewhat interesting and holds your attention. Further, many scenes have three or more girls. The photography is mostly done in an erotic way, focusing on the pussy. There is a minimum of diagonal shots and there are very few cases where the focus is on the face or the background when it is inappropriate. The sex is a good mix of soft and hard, with a lot of pussy and breast licking, as well as the use of toys. There is even a little variety within the genre, such as footplay and toe licking. Overall an enjoyable site with not much competition on the net.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Every scene in 1920x1080 resolution FullHD video
-Very hot models, some of the best East Europeans available at the moment in my opinion
-This is one of the few sites in the 21Sextury network (along with LezCuties, AnalTeenAngels and CutiesGalore) that offers the photo sets in the original 21MP format. Cannot really ask for more than the originals
-It's as hardcore as it gets with only girls without going into stranger fetishes
-Sexy underwear in almost every scene, stockings, garter belts etc.
-Standard 21S network pros: No DRM, unlimited downloads, well working streaming, super fast downloads (up to 11 megabytes per second which is over the stated rate of my connection) with manager all in a very reasonably priced huge package
Cons:
-Only 14 scenes available so far but update rate is weekly
-Couldn't spot any strap-ons or very unusual insertions even though those two were specifically mentioned in the advertisement on the network main page. It's dildos, bigger dildos and double headed ones. Hope to see more of the strap-on variety in the future
-Slightly smudgy video image, at least on the highest resolution. Far from the extreme sharpness of sites like DominatedGirls and PixAndVideo. I guess if one's short on storage, it's best to compare 720p and 1080p before deciding if it's worth it downloading the highest resolution
-I couldn't get any video on this network play back on my cell phone
Bottom Line:
This is the latest addition to the steadily growing 21Sextury.com network. Like someone already commented, this one could be described as a more slutty and grown up version of their site LezCuties. There are many models that have been featured on that site as well but here you will find them wearing more makeup, sexy underwear (never too much of that in my opinion) and if possible being even more hardcore with each other and their toys.
Currently the site has 14 scenes, 13 with two girls and one threesome (tomorrows update appears to be another threesome featuring Logan with two other girls doing some strange looking golf ball pushing). It's mostly anal and gaping heavy material which may not be everyone's favorite but if it works for you, this is as good as it gets. Every scene features many toys, dildos, plugs etc. I just wish they had those advertised strap-ons in use too.
Pictures are available in two varieties of zips like on the sister sites. High resolution appears to be slightly compressed jpg's straight out of a 21 megapixel camera so there is more than enough to zoom for anyone. Video resolution is the standard choices up to 1080p which unfortunately isn't the best this network has to offer. It's little soft and lacks contrast at times. Still good compared to many other sites and doesn't lose a bit to the standard Blu-Ray 720p quality porn I've seen.
The odd problem with video files corrupting popped up again some months ago but I remember having trouble with it only for a week or two. Ever since then the downloads have been fast and working. Only some strange hiccups where my download manager jumps from 100% dl completion back to somewhere in 20-30% to eventually download it all.
The rating of 85 reflects in part the fact that there are not that many scenes yet and unlike on DailySexDose, there isn't a ready update list stretching months into the future. I will raise the score eventually if the site keeps pushing out quality material like that already available.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Tons of girl-next-door type models
+ Very clear update schedule
+ Latest videos are even higher resolution (what seems to be a second step up for AW)
+ Lots of user input with their inclusion of User Lists on top of the already established forum
+ As is, a decent ammount of variety, although boy/girl action is almost non-existant
+ Several video options
+ Full zip and custom zips for pictures
+ Download Manager/Accelerator friendly
Cons:
- A lot of repetition in the pic sets - including long strings of pics that seem to have been taken with a motor drive
- Surprising amount of slightly out of focus and/or shadowed pictures
- The logo on videos, though smaller than before, still seems intrusive to me - in more than a few cases, the model is shot off-center and towards the logo
- It's really not their forté, but I still wish they'd include more boy/girl content
Bottom Line:
Ever the fan of just about anything amateur, and as it is now, I like Abby's. This is my second signup there. My biggest concern about the site is the impending split that's in the works. The details haven't been ironed out, but it seems they're going to split the different parts of their site into separate pay-for-what-you want segments. Tentatively, this will put all their girl/girl material in one section, the masturbation videos in another, with the rest of their material in yet another. One of the things I like about Abby's right now IS the variety and I, for one, would hate to see it get broken up. Unless each individual segment is going to be dirt cheap, it'll definitely wind up costing more to get the same variety as you get now. I just hope they don't price themselves out of my reach.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Unbelievable amount of content
Excellent organization of trends, fetishes, and themes
First-class amateur photography
Frequent updates
Incredibly user-friendly
Personalizable zipsets!
Cons:
Extremely slow load-time for North American members
Bottom Line:
Abby Winters is the pinnacle for me in the amateur porn realm. It's the only site I've made consecutive memberships with, and can only say that it has impressed me time and time again with its incredible dedication to providing its users with the best customer-quality on the net; it is truly user-friendly, and ultimately user-dedicated. On the downside, however, it loads very slowly on North American computers (the site is out of Melbourne), which really slows down the enjoyment when more than one window is open. Still, if the teaser content has you interested, the site itself is extremely true to what it advertises, and always puts its members first. While it may run slow, you will not be disappointed.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
04-24-0912:38pm (Update History) Reason: Updated score - see notes in reply
Pros:
***EDITTED REVIEW***
+ Amateur lovers delight
+ Newer video available in: flv - 120, 400 & 900kbps/ LQ mp4 512x288 @ 1536 bitrate /HQ mp4 1024x576 @ 1536 /mpg 512x288 @ 2165 /wmv 768x432 @ 2189
+ Drop down menus & "Jump to buttons" everywhere. A small sampling: Recently viewed pages, pics & vids, membership & account management links, lists to sort by model, body feature, video shot by _____, pictures shot by ______, lists by activity (masturbation, outdoors, kissing, etc.) You can reorder most lists by name, by date & reverse order.
+ At the time of this review there are: Images: 364,327/ Videos: 3,844 (570 hours, 54 minutes)/ Pic sets: 2,964/ Models: 1,139/ Solo shoots: 1,534/ Girl-Girl shoots 293/ Intimate Moments shoots: 566
+ pic sets average 100-150/set @ 1472 x 981 resolution. 202 sets available in extra large @ 3504 x 2336
+ zip files - complete sets or customized
+ download manager compatible (with con below)
+ TBP discount
Cons:
- Going to the sitemap to get a full list of shoots/models, it takes over a half minute to load the list - and that's every time you go back to it. Find a model, go to her page, click the back button & the whole list has to reload.
- Too many videos and picture sets where you have to get halfway through to see "the fun bits"
- Unless I'm missing an attempt at being artistic, I've never understood how a closeup shot could be clear at the top, blurry at the bottom and still considered "postable". If the equipment you're using doesn't make a clear shot, either don't post the pic or get equipment that can make it clear.
- Download manager seems to randomly kick out videos with a message that user name and password are invalid. Go back to the file and retry it and it downloads (I use FreeDownloadManager)
- Even with the size of the site, the regular price $39 a month for full access is steep!
- System resource hog!!! (See notes in reply)
Bottom Line:
Right after I posted my comment, asking for details, I went digging around on their tour pages and saw just what messmer mentioned - former members can get the old rate with access to all 3 sections. Plus a TBP discount? Nice! I'm in for another 3 months.
This was a hard review to wrap up. My first list of pros was over 2000 characters and I had to pare it down to what you saw above. This is my fourth time in for this site and, for the most part, I like what I see. But, while it's one the most feature laden sites out there, it does seem to be losing some of it's appeal. The choice of video formats is really nice and picture lovers should definitely appreciate the custom zip option. I'm also glad to see they've long done away with the past practice of almost deliberately covering the action with an obtrusive logo. (A bit of a side note on that - Abby! Impress us! Reissue the old videos with the new, smaller logo!) The navigation, though slightly overwhelming at first because of all the options, is really fairly simple and straightforward. But, with another nod to messmer's reply to my comment, I agree that the people doing the shooting need to change what they're doing. A 7 page set shouldn't get to skin on page 4. Then there's their choice of shots. "Okay - here's a closeup pussy shot. Now here's the same shot from 2 inches to the left. Whoa - same shot from 6 inches up and over. Now a little to the right..." And, unless I'm missing an attempt at being artistic, I've never understood how a closeup shot could be clear at the top, blurry at the bottom and still considered "postable". If the equipment you're using doesn't make a clear shot, either don't post the pic or get equipment that can make it clear. In the same vein, I'm not a big fan of a 10-minute video with 5 minutes of watching a girl walking and talking. If there really are people who want non-nude, interview-type video, there should be a separate video for that. I tend to save everything I download, so I'd really like to see shorter videos and smaller, less repetitive picture sets, resulting in less hard drive space being taken up.
Since I got the grandfathered rate, I'm not displeased with this latest membership. But I think I'd have a hard time recommending this to anyone but people who've never seen the site or haven't been there in a long time. As big as it is, $39 a month for full access is steep. And $25 for single niche access just seems high, given the erratic updates. I still rate it high because, even with what I see it lacking, it's still amateurs and a lot of 'em.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Decent amount of content around 5,606 videos (although most girl-girl and boy-girl scenes have three videos each) around 1,427 models and daily updates.
- Exclusive models
- More recent videos are available in multiple formats up to 1280x720
- All shoots have images available as ziped files, they also have a best of, which highlight the best photos in a nice gallery.
- All models look very natural, little make-up many are not shaved, just trimmed almost all look very next door girl
- The sex looks very natural, there are some awkward pauses, no insane penetration angles, the blowjobs look realistic.
- Overall the site has a fun, softcore feel with some close-ups of vaginas and blowjobs.
- A lot of the scenes have a before and after where they interview the models and the girls seem pretty relaxed (although there are some serious language barriers at times)
-In a lot of scenes the orgasms are or look real.
- Good download speeds
- Decent forum with many members
Cons:
- Almost all of the videos have an old school feel to them, with highlights overblown and colors a bit faded. Even the highest resolutions feel a bit grainy.
- A lot of videos are broken up into various parts. Also the before and after interviews could have easily been lumped with the actual scene.
- Scenes tend to have a slow intro (I remember one video where the boy texts the guy for 3 minutes)
- The site's navigation is decent but takes some getting used to. There are videos labeled "intimate moments" which are basically solo masturbation shots, but there are also "solo shots" and "after dark" shots and when I say shot I don't mean a video I mean a collection of videos... trust me it makes sense but it takes some getting used to
- The girls are very natural looking and some could use a bit more make-up. I was expecting the same kind of models Backroomcastingcouch or Exploitedcollegegirls has, but the girls here seemed less attractive (IMO)
Bottom Line:
Man, this site is something else. I've been a member of most major porn sites over the years and have seen many styles and combinations of content, but Abbywinters stands out as a unique product. If I had to compare it to anything else I'd say it's close to suicide girls in their focus on fun, softcore stuff and community (at least that's how suicide girls used to be back when I joined it a few year ago)
The great selling point of the site are the exclusive, natural looking models and the realistic settings and action. The site claims that all scenes are shot in the girls homes with their outfits and only (supposedly) with their boyfriends and/or girlfriends. To cement this claim there are before and after sex interviews where the girls explain what felt good and what they were nervous/ excited about, where they met the boyfriend, how often they have sex in private and so on.
Aside from scenes with boy-girl, girl-girl sex the site has "Intimate moments" scenes where supposedly the girls are alone with the camera and can be themselves as well as solo shots where the director interviews them a bit before the action. They also have a handful of "after dark" scenes where the girls are supposed to be dressed in nicer clothes and be more romantic. I hope they get more of these as some of the outfits were very nice, but for right now they only have a dozen or so.
Overall the site has a decent premise, unique content and a strong community of followers (and a great forum btw). If you like their style and the girls this place will be a great find and the 3 month membership a steal. However the scenes are far from perfect and you could easily end up disliking the site for how different it feels.
The navigation is efficient, but somewhat different from other porn sites and can get a bit confusing at first. The homepage shows the updates, but the preview images are not animated. The easiest way to browse is by looking at shoots and then either video shoots or image shoots (this way you get animated previews), but you can't easily view all models that video or only images and there is no way to search for top rated models or Russian models. Not to mention that older videos tend to be split into 10 parts and even more recent ones often have 2 parts.
Speaking of videos, I have to say that the girls look great in photos but in many of the videos they end up looking average, even a bit disappointing. I suspect that in order to maintain the vibe of the site everything is filmed with minimal equipment and it shows. Overexposed shots, some blurry close-ups, the sound of the camera taking photos in the background. It all contributes to make the site feel unprofessional. Don't even ask me how many scenes are shot in an extremely bright room with perfectly clean white walls or how overexposed reds look in half the scenes. Overall for me the technical quality was a huge disappointment.
The content itself is decent with a lot of the girls really into it and believable orgasms
However it's a bit slow paced for my taste. All sex scenes take several minutes before anyone gets naked. I personally don't see the need for a little make believe story (oh I'm a photographer, get naked. Oh we're watching tv, get naked) when there is a before interview where the girls say they are excited to have sex (especially when some scenes are only 25 minutes long).
Speaking of the interviews. Some have captions to translate the interview and those are great, the British accents on some girls are even better, but the broken English most girls have coupled with giggling every two seconds when they don't understand the question can get frustrating and took me out of the mood.
At the end of the day I see the appeal of Abby Winters, but I don't think I saved more than a handful of videos. The image sets are very good, but the technical quality and the poor set-up make this feel like old, old Pierre Woodman casting videos. I don't regret joining the site but it's not my cup of tea, I'll stick with Nubiles, which has a similar feel but much better navigation and quality videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Beautiful models, virtually tatoo-free
-Hundreds of exclusive videos/pictures
-Plenty of downloading options
-Many ways to nagivate the site
-Frequent updates
-PU discount
Cons:
-The action is still not 100% convincing
-No site tour before you join (though there are plenty of preview clips on the web)
Bottom Line:
This site has been around a while now, but when it first came out it was the best in it's niche. The girls were stunners (unlike another particularly highly-rated site), and for the most part, natural. But, more importantly, the girls actually seemed to be really 'going for it', justifying the site's tagline: 'pretty girls doing it right'.
The site's aim is to deliver realistic, passionate lesbian action, a far cry from some of the unconvincing and even 'nasty' lesbian porn that existed previously, and ALMOST delivers. Yes, the action is more realistic and more intense than what most viewers were used to, but let's face it, that wasn't really hard to achieve was it?
Personally, I feel that although the action on this site is hot, many other sites have caught on to what viewers want in lesbian porn and are rapidly catching up, and in some cases, even overtaking the passion and realism displayed on this site.
In terms of overall quality, however, you still won't find a better site out there. This site updates frequently and has been around for 5+ years now. It has over 720 videos, which can be downloaded in clips, or as a full scene with a choice of video quality. As far as I know, most if not all of these scenes are exclusive to this site, although you will find many of their previews out on free clip sites. Not being interested in photos, I can't say what you will find on here, but I doubt you will be disappointed - there are thousands upon thousands.
You can search through the members area by the models in alphabetical order, by video/photos, or by a specific set of criteria (such as whether the scene contains tribbing or 69-sex, by hair colour or breast size of the models, or even whether it takes place outdoors, in the bedroom, or whatever). My only problem with this is that when searching by model, it's only by trial and error that you discover which models have photos and/or videos (it can be frustrating to discover an incredibly beautiful model, only to find that there are no movies of her).
Having been a member several years ago, I feel the site has gone downhill a bit as of late. Don't get me wrong, the database is continuously increasing in size and you can always download content from earlier years, but it just seems like lately the passion isn't as intense as it was. I get the impression that toys are being introduced more and the site is becoming less focussed on 1-to-1 intimacy and more on group scenes, etc.
Overall, I still think it's the best value-for-money lesbian site on the Net, but it's competitors are closing in. Also, if you're looking for passion, there are now better sites out there (which are unfortunately still very small and new).
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Over 540 videos.
-They update with one new scene each week.
-Very good selection of models.
-Very good chemistry between doms and subs.
-Videos can be downloaded in either wmv or mp4 and each version comes in standard & HD quality.
-You can use a download manager.
-Navigation between each Kink site does not require you to log in each time.
-Membership to one site gives you deals on the access to the other Kink sites.
-Less pain inducing BSDM.
Cons:
-The photosets are broken down into four section
and although can can download each section in one zip file. It would be nice if you could download the entire shoot as a single file.
-Their older content did not age well and I find that it contained a little too much pain and not enough sex.
Bottom Line:
I did this review in large part because of the last review that was done. I'm not sure what daniel saw that made him give this site such a low score but it can't have been what I saw.
I find that over the years the site has moved away from the intense pain giving BSDM porn to intense pleasure giving. The BSDM is still there but I find that it's more subdued. For me that is a plus because that was the one thing that always bothered me about the older content.
I took a look at the 30 most recent updates and Half the girls are newbies to this site and a large part of them are newbies to Kink. As well many of these are up and coming girls in the biz.
This site is for people that like lesbian porn with a BSDM twist and anal sex.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Crissy is hot!
While Crissy is now retired, the site is still adding 1 photoset a week
Nice variety of Crissy material - a whole section of her fetish material - several bondage photosets - plus lez and some material of Crissy having hetero sex - seeing her incredible bootie bouncing while she's being fucked is a sweet sight!
Lots of bonus sites - LonnieWaters.com, NataliaCruze.com, AmateursGoneBad.com & GlamourGirlsGoneBad.com
Cons:
Crissy is retired. When it comes to a site focused on a particular model and that model is retired, well the level of interaction with that model is going to be nil - of course, that is the case with this site.
b/g Hard-core material is limited - 6 photosets and 2 vids
Non-exclusive content. There is not a lot of exclusive content in this whole collection of sites. Probably the AmateursGoneBad.com stuff has been seen the least - and they have some hot stuff there - Nautica Thorn for example
Bottom Line:
If you've got a jones for Crissy and you haven't been a member of sites such as Twisty's or SexyBabes.tv, you're going to be more impressed than if you have seen her work at those other sites, because you'll have seen a lot of the stuff here before.
But with the sheer quantity of quality content available through joining this site, I've got to give it at least an 80 - If you've got the mind-set where bonus sites count to value, there's quite a bit of value here - I was happy to see the number of porn star shoots included in the AmateurGirls site - these are sets with lower production values, of course, but when you're talking about babes as hot as Nautica Thorn, for example, it's fun to see her simpler photo sets.
On the other hand, the lack of exclusive content is keeping me from staying past 2 months - virtually everything here is out there far and wide on other sites - for people who aren't members of other sites, this is a fine place to find it.
Navigation is simple - very few bells and whistles. Some links on Crissy's site are glitchy.
If Crissy ever decides that being a devout Christian and showing us her fine bod aren't a huge contradiction or she just misses being naughty, I for one will welcome this hot babe back with completely open arms. Crissy is hot!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- original concept; pretends to be "real reality" (with no script) but frankly I'm not 100% convinced
- variety of games
- quality is ok
- cameraguy work is quite good
Cons:
- I'm not 100% convinced that it is not scripted;
- undressing only
- photos only
- site design is pretty poor
Bottom Line:
These guys seem to promote the idea of softcore specifically distancing themselves from hardcore; they're part of a bigger initiative to promote softcore (but "NO PORN") described on KeepItNice.com.
Overall, the site produces very mixed feelings; while the concept is very good, you need to be a really big fan of girls undressing and playing games while half-dressed or in nude to overcome 'undressing only' and 'stills only' issues. On the other hand, if they would add videos, personally I could try to join them back.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Lovely models (mostly)
- HQ pics & vids
- Site well organized
Cons:
- Too much the same formual
- Fight rounds too long, hence total shoots FAR too long. Should be cut by half and spent more time on final round where trhe victor has her way with the loser.
- Too many scene have rough sex, I understand that this is a BDSM site, but for me, gagging, sudden spinal jolting, hair pulling, has no erotic appeal. Spanking is fine, but anything which endangers the sub's spinal alignment or her airway is a no-np
- Instead of the current MC (Matt), I would prefer to see one (or two) super-fit, leanly built mean-looking guys, dressed up to the nines.
Bottom Line:
Site has good potential, but makes serious and pnvious blunders, which rob it of real erptic spice.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Very cute young Euro babes
-Lots of really hot analingus
-Good long anal gape shots too
-The girls seem to genuinely enjoy their activities
-Movie and gallery content quality is consistently very good IMO
-General production values (lighting, camera work, editing) is excellent
-High quality zipped galleries
Cons:
-Updates come in bits; takes ten days to get a full 'all in one' update. Apart from for a few dial-up users in outer Mongolia, the small parts are pointless.
-Not a massive archive - but reasonable (was about 70 movies 4 months ago)
-Movie technical quality is not excellent - but still more than reasonable
Bottom Line:
For me, weighing up the pros and cons, the pros have it by a mile. I really enjoyed my first visit to the site about 6 or 7 months back, so much so that I re-visited to get a few updates about 3 or 4 months later - although regretted this, as the value for money was obviously much decreased by that time for me.
Still, I now have a little under 70 quality lesbian-anal niche movies on my hard drive that I still like to re-visit when I need something that is guaranteed to give some quick no-nonsense relief. This is one collection that I can't see myself deleting in a hurry.
Pic galleries are nice and crisp and detailed and have some fine anal close-ups. Movies are all in small-screen format of the same kind of res as you'd find on the average 20 Sextury site (i.e. not excellent, but still good), and there's a refreshing lack of bullshit, just consistently hot all-girl fun, well filmed to capture all the detail you crave. And roughly a quarter of the content features threesomes. Even hotter!
A bigger archive and faster updates would push the score well into the 90s for me.
Bottom line:- Like lesbians? Like anal? Like cute Euro-babes? Then you'll love Lez Cuties!
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
If this were a normal porn site I would think the models are very attractive, the thing that makes this site so amazing is that these beautiful women do the nastiest things.
Content is great for those that are into this sort of fetish. Pissing, food play and puking are the main themes.
Membership includes access to their sister site. As the site is not listed here and the content is controversial I won't mention it in this review. I have listed it as a pro because it doubles the amount of content available.
The technical aspect of the content is pretty good but not normally HD. There are 1 or 2 720P MP4's on the site but they are not regularly updating in HD although the quality of the 480P videos is still good.
Cons:
Download limits. Having a limit per 24 hours is bad enough but also having an hourly limit makes it a real chore to download the content.
Updates used to be a full scene once or twice a week. Recently a update counts as a 5 minute clip from a scene. They are usually posting clips from several scenes at once so it can take weeks for a full scene to be available.
Older content is not only poor quality technically (looks like it was transferred from VHS) but also very old. Some of the scenes are from the mid 90's and haven't aged at all well.
Scenes are not accompanied by photo sets.
In some of the scenes the ladies seem to have downed a couple of bottles of vodka beforehand, I don't know why but that makes me feel kind of uneasy.
Bottom Line:
There are 2 things that would instantly get this site a score of 80 from me:
1. Get rid of the download limits.
2. Update complete scenes
The (newer) content itself is excellent, I don't know of any other sites that have this sort of quality of women pissing and throwing up over each other, it's like a car crash, you know you shouldn't look but something makes you anyway :)
If this is the sort of content you are into it is worth a membership but beware, beware, beware the download limits.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
