Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Ultimate Surrender

Ultimate Surrender (0)

Toadsith (48) 01-08-08  12:58pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (47), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * A Whopping 205 Matches (4 videos each, one per round)
* Multiple Vid Formats (iPod, WMV, Real, Streaming Real Hi/Low)
* High Res WMV Video (960x540, 856kbps) – NO DRM
* Download Managers work - approx. 500kbps down
* Large photos for each match (1200 x 802)
* Intense sexually themed, lesbian nude wrestling matches – refereed with points
* Each match has 3 rounds of wrestling
* The 4th Round features hardcore lesbian sex (strong domination theme)
* Wrestler stats pages great for finding matches
Cons: * Older videos are much lower quality
* Search engine has some issues
* New video has a low bit rate – looks a little fuzzy
Bottom Line: Ultimate Surrender has a massive amount of real, sexually themed, lesbian nude wrestling. It isn’t uncommon for the models to get hurt – it’s bad when it happens, but it goes to show how aggressively they are wrestling.

The recent seasons have great production values (multiple cameras, great lighting) and many of the wrestlers are veterans of the site now. Each match has 3 wrestling rounds – a side earns points for controlling the other and gets “style points” awarded for sexual molestation of the dominated wrestler. 4th round lets the winner(s) fuck the loser(s) any way they please (usually dominating strap-on sex).

The site design is simple, practically retro – the search engine isn’t hot, but the wrestler stats pages work very well, making it is easy to find any match. Video quality is good, but the bit rate is low, resulting in fuzzy video. Large photos come with each match.

Ultimate Surrender merges the sport of wrestling and the appeal of dominating lesbian sex, and approaches the wrestling very seriously – pre & post match interviews generally focus on strategy. It’s easy to cheer for one side – despite match outcomes being revealed (though some live matches happen too). The site delivers what it advertises very well – unique content by a reputable and customer focused company. Highly recommended.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


pat362 (375) Hi Toadsmith. I've been curious about this site. I know that the winner of the wrestling match gets to abuse the other girl, but is there a lot of strap on anal sex between the performers.
04-06-08  10:32am

Reply To Message


Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :

While there is a ton of strap-on sex - seriously, seriously rough strap-on sex - anal sex is a less common. Only a few of the models do it - largely I think because since strap-ons haven't any nerve-endings the model controlling it doesn't exactly know how rough she is being. That said, it isn't too uncommon. Anytime Amber Rayne loses you can expect to see copious anal sex - as she is a big fan of it. In fact, tag-team matches with her often see her getting DPed. It kind of pains me to know that she keeps becoming a better wrestler, as we see less and less of her on the receiving end.

None-the-less, this is still some of the most aggressive strap-on action I've seen - complete with gagging and all. And the wrestling matches themselves are quite engaging. Some point in the future I'll be rejoining to check out their new super-sized wrestling mat and how that changes the competition.

04-06-08  10:41am

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #2 - Toadsith :

Thanks for the info. I'll have too keep this one in mind. I've enjoyed some of their other sites like Whipped Ass, and Sex and Submission. I like a little S & M, but sometimes they seem to go beyond my comfort zone. Like most modern porn. The interaction between actors in some of their scenes is lacking any kind of chemistry. I joined earlier this Year Chanta's Bitches, and I find that she has good chemistry with most of the girls that go on her site.
04-06-08  06:57pm

Reply To Message


Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #3 - pat362 :

I really do like Kink and their policies - while granted it is pretty difficult in publishable porn to go beyond my comfort zone, I do really appreciate Kink's policy of pre and post interviews to show that everything is done in good spirit. I have to say that Sex And Submission is one of those sites I'm really looking forward to joining in the future - I just have some other high priorities picks ready first.

I do have to say though, in regards to my experience with Ultimate Surrender and my limited experience with Fucking Machines - their production style and capability has come so mind-bendingly far that you don't want to really look at the old content. It is sort of like looking at younger pictures of yourself when you thought you looked awesome with that Dukes of Hazzard t-shirt stretched across your stomach - you just cringe and desperately find something better to look at.

04-06-08  07:20pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #4 - Toadsith :

Come on who doesn't look good in a "General Lee" T-shirt? My issue odly enough isn't so much with the content as much as the fact that girls get off on being, for lack of a better word, tortured. I'm sure it's consentual, but on some scenes I still have a hard time with it. You are correct that the newer stuff is one step higher, than most of the prior material.
04-07-08  06:18pm

Reply To Message


Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #5 - pat362 :

Indeed the brutality of some of the scenes is quite too much for a large percentage of the porn audience; and that is the reason you really need to look through Kink's stuff, check out the free site and make damn sure you know what content you'll be getting access to. Otherwise it's just a bloody waste of money and might upset your day as well.

Of course for me, I'm part of the audience they are pandering to - so its all good, lol.

04-07-08  07:08pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #6 - Toadsith :

I can't claim that I don't enjoy what they offer since I've been a member of some of their sites and might join more often if it weren't for the high price. I just find that some scenes are too intense to turn me on. At least the intensity is not for shock value like I've seen on some other sites.
04-08-08  06:19pm

Reply To Message


Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #7 - pat362 :

I agree that the pure shock value stuff bores me to tears. When I was a member of Suicide Girls, so many girls did suicide themed sets that it was just ridiculous. The very first one to do it was inspired; the rest needed their heads banged together.
04-08-08  06:31pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #8 - Toadsith :

I did visit suicide girls a couple of times, but I've never been a big fan of extreme pierceings and tatoos. Unlees I'm mistaken that his most if not all their models. Actually there are 4 things that make me lose interest in a girl. Fake breasts (because most usually exagerate to a size that alters their entire body shape), Tattoos because most distract from the girls natural beauty, extreme body
piercings, and finally cosmetic surgery that alters the shape of the face.

04-09-08  05:29pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.