| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
manast's Reply
I have the same problem. (Oops, Bill Gates says we have to call them "issues," not "problems")
I cannot make the PU link work at all using FireFox. I just tried by going into PornUsers.com as a visitor using IE and was successful getting the preview site and the $9.95 PU price to show up on the JOIN link.
So it appears that the issue may be associated with using FireFox as your browser, if that's what you are doing.
|
05-22-13 09:53am
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It depends on all other aspects of the total package.
I love the super huge tits on Christy Marks and Hitomi Tanaka but I also love the teeny tiny A tits on Jana Jordan (aka Jana Foxy).
Fake tits that were stuck in by an artistic surgeon (Memphis Monroe, for example) are perfect but most aftermarkets are ridiculous.
|
05-21-13 09:51am
|
Comment
3
|
Prime Cups
(0)
|
|
05-11-13 11:27am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's a common element of most websites these days and have become a whole lot less annoying these days. But too many kills my tolerance.
|
05-11-13 11:20am
|
Reply
5
|
Nubile Films
(1)
|
Reply of
luv lickn clit's Reply
I don't think so. Reading through all of the details on TBP, it looks like the two sites are totally different and are shown as being owned by different companies.
Unfortunate that the newer site (Nubile Films)chose that name.
|
05-09-13 11:09am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
With some girls glasses are a nice enhancement. On others they are a distraction.
|
05-07-13 08:52am
|
Reply
7
|
Nicole Peters
(1)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree. I probably gave too much weight to the nice titty action by Nicole which was, in turn, nicely recorded by the cameraman.
I've given 50's to totally worthless sites like Angelica Costello's site (aka Venus) and one of Jana Foxy's lousy sites.
On reflection, this site is probably worth a 60 overall, not 69.
|
05-06-13 10:42pm
|
Review
8
|
Nicole Peters
(1)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Nicole Peters has a tremendous rack that is on display in every one of the 14 videos and 26 photo sets.
Her boob displays are well done for us titty fans with good angles and massaging.
The production quality is OK; no HD but even the older stuff is reasonably good.
That's about it for the "Pros" list. |
| Cons: |
Dormant site. As far as I can tell the last posting on the site was early 2011 but I suspect the material was created much earlier than that.
No hard core. In fact, now that I say that I don't recall seeing any males in any of the content doing anything at all.
Nicole has a furry bush (some would prefer that) that hides her pussy quite effectively. While I like neatly trimmed pubic hair, her bush looks like she has never shaved. It's conceivable, but unlikely, that her material was produced when wild bush was the standard rather than the exception.
It has a deceptive tour site that suggests the site has a lot of content. But at a bit more than $1.15 per very tame and rather short length video available for download it certainly ain't worth it. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is a "throw-in" site that is part of the Score network. It can be selected as an additional site (free) by being a renewing Score member. That's how I became a member.
If you like videos/pix of nice, very large natural mammaries on well proportioned bodies, you'll like Nicole, but as with many "throw-in" sites this one definitely isn't worth the TBP discounted price of $18.
The four videos available on the parent site, Scoreland, are of equal quality so if you want to check out Nicole, sign up with Scoreland and select the Nioole Peters site when you get the opportunity to sign up for the bonus sites.
The 69 score is based on the meager quantity of material, the lack of any updates, the absence of any mid-core or hardcore action and the ridiculous price.
The site does get some minor props for good, not great, video/photo quality. |
|
05-05-13 10:17am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
9
|
My Horny Asians
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
The folks at 21Sextury produce a superb site from a content and quality standpoint but have been ethically challenged (or worse) for several years in their business practices. Apparently they don't understand that, when they piss off a Porn User, they do serious damage to their profitability. There's enough money in the jizz biz that they don't need to use deceptive practices to boost their profits.
Many other sites use the same gambit, but always preceded with "price as low as..." 21Sextury doesn't do that, but the PU/TBP price is accurately stated.
That's why I won't sign up for any site that isn't listed in Porn Users.
|
05-05-13 09:29am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Absopositively do. I want to know what the site was like two or more years ago and what PU member replies were back then...then compare those observations to the current ones.
Some (a few) sites actually show some improvement but most seem like nothing has changed.
|
05-05-13 09:13am
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Bottom line, based on this series of experiences, and my own, signing up for any site is a gamble and requires the new member to be willing to lose their investment because most support functions are incompetent at best, and a pure fiction at worst.
The sites that have a responsive and effective support function (and are user friendly) will maintain a loyal fan base and will thrive.
|
04-28-13 08:13am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
My experience with tech support for sites ranges from abysmal (21 extury, Danni.com, DDF Network, Hustler, Reality Kings, Bang Bros., for example) to wonderful (VideoBox, Score, Naughty America, for example), so I answered "other."
I would say any site that provides an answer to a support issue within 24 hours and the answer actually makes sense and is responsive to the issue qualifies as "wonderful." "Abysmal" means no response at all, or a canned response such as "we received your ticket and will get back to you with a response within ...(period of time) an no response ever shows up.
Not the question, but CCBill is always superb and Epoch is a very close second for billing services.
|
04-27-13 11:43am
|
Reply
13
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
That's exactly why I always check TBP and PU before signing up for any new site. I have saved a lot of money doing that.
|
04-20-13 10:40am
|
Reply
14
|
Roxy Raye
(1)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I just discovered this babe and I agree with Pat's comments about Roxy. In what I've seen on Evil Angel, where she's done a lot of stuff, she's really into messing with her butt in ways I've never considered. She's one super cute babe who doesn't look like she'd ever be into anything as kinky as this extreme anal stuff.
In any case as with Pat, I also don't quite get the erotic appeal of shoving bottles, large dildoes, even miniature basketballs, either as an observer or a participant.
But I am really into Roxy as a total babe!
|
04-15-13 08:26am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I completely agree. Some sites give you the whole magilla (just short of actual downloadable content) so you can test navigation, check out the babes and get familiar with their content and quality. Right away that makes the site a great shot at getting my money.
|
04-11-13 06:58am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I usually switch it off (power off) because that clears almost everything and secures my computer (requires a password to start up. However occasionally I'll leave it on, but only when I have a large set of D/L's working.
|
04-03-13 09:35am
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I enjoy the interviews if the questions are well thought out and not mad up as the interviewer goes along. Otherwise a waste of time.
|
03-23-13 09:53am
|
Reply
18
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
I booted the site after experiencing a lot of frustration with their lousy, bordering on fraudulent, business practices. When I signed up there was only the one network and the longer you stayed a member you could access more sites in the network. Then they split into two networks and they picked the sites. In my case they were sites I seldom visited.
When I complained I was told, in so many words, buzz off. So that's what I did.
I loved the excellent quality of the content and of the range of talent they had but like you I really found the lousy search function to be very annoying.
I miss the good stuff but don't miss the folks that run the site.
|
03-18-13 09:02am
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Normally only the "best stuff" but on a few smaller single girl sites or genre specific sites, I might try for a total drain of everything.
|
03-18-13 08:51am
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I usually have the sound switched off when watching the babes because for some strange reason I'm more interested in the visual stimulation and not whatever dialog might be associated with the scene. However when I do switch on the audio, I go nuts over any accent. Even a Brooklyn accent.
One exception. For some reason, when Gianna Michaels laughs, which is often, it's very distracting. So I switch it off and enjoy her best feature, those absolutely fabulous fun bags.
|
03-15-13 08:21am
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Provided they all have PTA, I'm good.
PTA = Pussy, Tits and Ass
|
03-12-13 09:31am
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Ditto RB's comments. There is one site I really like with assholes in charge of the service function.
But apart from that, I will stay with a site that provides good support/webmaster interest and will drop a site after one month with a shitty webmaster when I have a need to contact him/her.
|
03-08-13 09:28am
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Ditto. I have "favorited" some sites that I forget about. Looking through the list I have checked em out again and actually signed up as a result.
|
03-05-13 08:31am
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Dracula's Poll
Doc says no. So it's no.
|
03-03-13 07:55am
|
Reply
25
|
Wet And Puffy
(4)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
My experience is discussed in a comment I made last August.
All problems were resolved but not easily. There is no support function available to members. Fortunately the webmaster reads posts on the PU site and posted a reply with his email address. He was on it immediately.
I decided not to renew mainly because of limited time, but once I was able to access the site (and the two sister sites) I was impressed with both the quality of the material and the natural beauty of the models.
I hope that the webmaster has since added a support capability to address issues that arise.
|
02-28-13 11:59pm
|
