Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit abbywinters

abbywinters (0)

buckdaddy1 (0) 01-20-08  02:09pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (5)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site is the best site i have ever been a part of. I have several lesbian and bi friends that also feel the same way. It's better than Porn. It's a bunch of lovely ladies making love. The way they touch,the way they take charge is evident they know exactly what there doing. I started by buying several DVD's Then bought a membership ,which may be the best thing i've ever done. Great downloads ! The most beautiful women on the net , All natural ,Just Plane Beautiful, Thank You Abby and Thank You Abby Winters Girls!
Cons: NONE
Bottom Line: Simply The Best!

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


congestus (Disabled) Excellent review.

I think that my membership was the best subscription I'd ever taken out. Certainly will keep renewing as long as they keep things natural!

01-20-08  08:13pm

Reply To Message


buckdaddy1 (0) REPLY TO #1 - congestus :

I see i got some no's as far as trust,but i stand firm .This is the best (site) because of the natural way they go about it.Plus i think the girls are beautiful.
None of those high heel shoes in bed like most porn vid's.
These girls at Abby Winters are the Real McCoy! I don't like calling it a porn site.It's something much better than just a porn site

01-22-08  05:48pm

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) REPLY TO #2 - buckdaddy1 :

Perfect scores are always suspect here. Even the best sites have issues, albeit small ones, that detract from their being perfect. But I think you're getting negative trust ratings more for the way your Pros section reads more like a bottom line. Your review wasn't very detailed. My suggestion would be to read the guidelines on what a good review should include and rewrite it. Maybe some of those negatives will be changed.
02-14-08  08:17am

Reply To Message


buckdaddy1 (0) REPLY TO #3 - RagingBuddhist :

Thanks for the reply but for sure i'm not a writer never claimed to be,but i still feel like what i said about the subject at hand was really how i felt.
I have to many other important things in my life to worry about negatives,when it comes to porn sites. I love the abbywinters site .
Thank You again

02-18-08  09:34am

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) REPLY TO #4 - buckdaddy1 :

I didn't think I was asking you to become a writer. You did take the time to note the negative trust ratings, so I figured, however incorrectly, that it was an issue for you. I was merely trying to be helpful. Forgive me.
02-18-08  01:39pm

Reply To Message


buckdaddy1 (0) REPLY TO #5 - RagingBuddhist :

Thank You for the help
Abby is still Number One here.
I'm giving it another perfect score.
Thanks again RagingB

03-01-08  07:18am

Reply To Message


mbaya (364) Every site has some cons,even the best. In order for a review to be trusted as objective you have to help those who may have a different opinion from yours.
11-18-08  03:22pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.