Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Twistys

Twistys (3)

nadiencendia (83) 07-28-10  11:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (42), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Amazing ammount of content: many more pictures than videos, but that's quite usual, isn't it...
-Good update rythm: two-three picture sets and two videos a day
-Really beautiful girls (mostly American big-titted actresses, but also some European cuties)
-Easy navigation and different search options
-Good picture and video quality, specially in recent sets
-No download limits
-Good pricing, considering the content they offer
-Full trial membership (I received a special 1$ discount for "old customers: best deal ever).
Cons: -Downloads are at times a bit slow
-Content may be too softcore for some viewers, specillay after a while (and the hardcore part of the site is really minimal)
-Not all content is exclusive
-Some company ads, not too annoying though
Bottom Line: I rejoined this site thanks to a trial membership offer that I received in my email, for being and "old customer": 1$ for three days, renewable at 14.95$ a month. Probably the best invested buck in my whole life.

The archive is huge. That's probably Twisty's most salient quality. Being one of internet's "classics", it has so much content (more picture sets than vids, but that's quite usual, isn't it) that you would need months to download and browse it all -specially considering that download speeds aren't always the best. The quality of the videos varies depending on their release date, newer videos being offered in three different qualities.

The models/actresses are mostly American girls with huge tits -a lot of them, fake-, but you will also find a handful of sets by some of our favorite European models, such as Sophie Moone, Eufrat, Eve Angel or Nella (here as Nellie Hunter). Most girls are absolutely stunning, so no complains there.

The only possible dissapointment about Twistys is that it is too softcore, or too regularly softcore: most sets and vids are solo masturbation sets, very beautifully lit, acted, filmed and edited. This is great, but it can get a little too repetitive once you've watched it a dozen times with a dozen different girls, and the bunch of lesbian or hardcore videos available are just not enough to balance this feeling.

But this is just to say something bad about a good site: good in ammount of content, in quality of pics and videos, in model selection and even in price, if you are lucky enough to get a discount (PU's offer or other one). It could be a good holiday idea, to get a Twistys one month membership and download as much as you can...

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Capn (28) A useful review, but I would disagree with you on masturbation & toy use. That really isn't softcore. It falls in that midcore area.

Cap'n. :0)

07-28-10  12:42pm

Reply To Message


nadiencendia (83) REPLY TO #1 - Capn :

Ok, it could be a useful distinction. For me, almost any solo action is softcore; most lesbian action (specially kinky stuff excluded) could be midcore; and any boy/girl action with penetration etc., hardcore; anyway, thanks for commenting :D
07-28-10  12:50pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #2 - nadiencendia :

Yes, I think so. I am trying to promote its use as I think it could be a useful time & money saver.

Quite a few softcore fans don't want masturbation or toy play. ;0)

Cap'n. :0)

07-28-10  01:00pm

Reply To Message


Monahan (44) REPLY TO #1 - Capn :

The characterization of toys and finger play as "midcore" is associated with the pornography standards of magazines over the latter part of the 20th Century.

Playboy was the first mainstream porn mag to show muff back in the late 1960's, creating a mild firestorm. Penthouse grabbed the momentum by showing modest amounts of genitalia, usually somewhat hidden by bush and, by today's standards, very mild.

Content in mainstream porn mags with any form of insertion arrived in the late 1990's in Hustler who toyed with the process earlier with solo labia lip activity.

We old farts look at insertions as going more hardcore than the PG (pretty girl) genre we grew up with where all there was was babes showing their bodies with no overt sexuality.

That's a long way of saying I understand where Capn is coming from and agree completely.

07-31-10  11:26am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #4 - Monahan :

A very comprehensive reply!

No overt sexuality, no.....

...but scope for plenty of eroticism.

Thanks for the support. It is appreciated! ;0)

Cap'n. :0)

08-01-10  09:27am

Reply To Message


Shap (40)
Thanks for the Review nadiencendia :)
01-19-11  08:15am

Reply To Message


nadiencendia (83) REPLY TO #6 - Shap :

You are welcome :)
01-19-11  10:23am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.