Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 51-75 of 258 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Boobs.pl

51. Boobs.pl (0)

timeac1 (0) 09-22-10  04:59pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of contents, no issues with navagation, no flash or java required. No DRM and zip files for photos.
Cons: Loud music before each video clip (as part of the clip), older content of poor quality, infrequent updates. Also new content is of lower grade (models) than the past, site appears to have a more hardcore feel to it based on recent updates.
Bottom Line: Has been site. Dropped from it's glory days 2-3 years ago.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Only Big Melons

52. Only Big Melons (0)

nostromo (12) 09-21-10  10:35am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Very good looking models, and there are a few that i had never seen before who have an amateurish look.
-Download speed is fine but it could be even better. You can dowload multiple files at a time.
-There seems to be no DL. No DRM.
-Video quality is uniform since the first video they posted in April 30 2007.
-You can DL full scenes or minute 10-20mbs files.
-Off the top of my head the only model that i can think of who has fake boobies is Lucy, although some of them have suspect boobies, however, for the most part, boobies look soft and natural.
-You have to login every once in a while, but it doesn't get annoying
-There are over 200 scenes. they have been updating once every week since April 2007. Sometimes every 4 or 5 days.
-Movies last between 5mins and 25mins, i don't know if that's a pro or a con. There is B/G content on the site, although B/G scenes are not as common as the solo scenes. G/G scenes are almost non existant, i downloaded one and it wasn't hardcore.
Cons: -The videos are not equipped with state of the art technology: 680x480, and a 2000Kbps bitrate. bad lightning abounds. If they are shot outdoors just forget it. Pretty visible pixelation.
-There are not pictures, only screencaps and their quality is awful.
-Given the material that they offer 24.95 euros seems pricey to me.
- Some models, although downright stunning, look terribly bored on their scenes and basically limit themselves to fondle their imposing titties: Alina, katya and adrianne Black spring to mind; they can't fathom how is that men look at their bodies devoutly, or perhaps they are shy and therefore irrelevant in the porn business, IMHO.
-The best looking models don't do B/G, as if that were a surprise.
-They could do with some category/niche filters.
Bottom Line: -If you are a big boob models completist i'd recommend this site without hesitating. If you are just a big boob fetishist there are ather sites that can cater to your needs much better.

-nevertheless, being a Shione Cooper, Zuzana drabinova and Monica Benjar junkie, i couldn't disregard this site, especially, if you are running out of sites like me.

-The memebership includes full access to BustyBritain and BigTitParadise, none of wich are superlative pornsites, and, incidentally, you have to log-in every time you switch from site to site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Pinup Files

53. Pinup Files (0)

nostromo (12) 09-20-10  09:34am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Great looking models.
-Download speed is ok: i got 350kps and the best that i've ever gotten from my connection with a website is 650kps.
-You can download multiple files at a time.
-There seems to be no DL limit. No DRM.
-One of their last videos uploaded: stunning Jordan Carver (who is waiting to take the step of showing her boobies) with a red bra; it lasts 6 mins and 9 secs, weighs 175mbs, the bitrate is 3977 and it displays as 960x540.
-A recently added set of pictures of Erica Campbell: i clicked on properties and it reads 557kbs and 2144x3152 pixels, i completely ignore if that's a pro or a con because i don't care much for pictures. You can download zipfiles.
-You can add models to a favourites folder.
-The total number of videos is 298 and the total number of photosets is 482.
-No regional pricing, i'll write it again: no regional pricing, that must constitute a pro in this poor reviwer's book.
Cons: -You need to login numerous times throughout an evening.
-their last set of Miss. Campbell's pics adds up to 33 images -althoughy i counted only 30- ; if i were a picture lover i'd rather have more pics per set.
-If you go back in time the quality of the videos drops too fast. September 29, 2008
Jana Defi video ("Red fishnet") lasts 5 mins and 58 secs weighs 66,7mbs, its bitrate is of 1551 kps and it displays as 320x240. The picture quality seems to diminish pretty fast to: Jana Defi pic from January 26, 2007 356x537 pixels
and weighs 302 kbs.
-terribly annoying music for the most part.
-Not very many models, although it has to be said that the ones they feature or stunning.
Bottom Line: I'd recommend the site to any big boobs lover, without a doubt, even if you're not a pin-up fan, the looks of their models are fantastic, but... beware! the music in their videos is so off-putting that perhaps you'll end up watching the videos muted, which is a shame, because i'd enthusiatically listen to whatever Miss Campbell or Miss Defi have to say and i'd also love to hear Miss Merylin Sekova speaking in a slavic language regardless of if she talks about shoes, politics, or marital questions. Nevertheless, i guess the music is required in order to mantain the pin-up glam fantasy. However, IMHO, it would be much more arousing to listen to Miss Campbell's contempt towards male filthy instincts.

And, last but not least, they don't resort to nasty geo-targeting pricing practises and that speaks volumes of their sense of decorum.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Polish Busty

54. Polish Busty (0)

Roy Stone (1) 09-03-10  09:24am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Visit once only! There is some good content but almost nothing added in the last year. Ewa Sonnet is absolutely stunning but (very) soft core only - likewise Maria Swan aka Jana Delfi. Big breasts with pretty faces, long hair and stunning slim bodies - very rare combination. There is some Bustyl Merilyn aka Anya with similar assetts and stronger material, but is on almost every other big-breast site too. Nelli Roono has the biggest breasts, but not the slim figure of the others.
Cons: No new material since March - and then only a few minutes of Nelli Roono and bikini photos (not even topless) of Ewa Sonnet. BIG disappointment! In the “Whats New” section is the following statement dated 28 August 2010:
Busty.pl LEGEND - EWA SONNET !!!
The truth is - she's a STAR for 7 years now !!!
The truth is - she does pose topless only !!!
The truth is - she's still active and never crossed the borders of her own CLASS !!!
The truth is - You won't find a WOMAN who's near of what EWA SONNET was, is and always'll be - FOREVER !!!
The SENSATION is - Welcome to a new era of EWA SONNET's LEGEND !!!”

Perhaps to give the impression there is new material of Ewa Sonnet – but there is not a single new photo or minute of video – a total fraudulent rip-off! I get the impression they’ve stopped paying for content. I sent a complaint but got no reply. My only hope is a big site like Scoreland will take Ewa Sonnet and pay her enough to do stronger material.
Bottom Line: Not worth the money - the material is very old and most good bits are on free softcore sites like dailymotion.com

Many stunners have said they will never do hardcore but ended up doing it on Scoreland and other sites. I only hope Ewa Sonnet, as well as Lorna Morgan, Yulia Nova, Maria Swan and Millena Velba follow suit. Likewise it would be good to see Hitomi Tanaka and Fuko (on Japanese sites) un-pixellated.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Flashy Babes

55. Flashy Babes (0)

nadiencendia (83) 08-06-10  07:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 08-13-10  03:53am  (Update History)
Reason: Horrible customer service
Pros: -Very professional-looking site, with a personal touch
-Very artistic pictures
-Some really cute girls
-Around 480 video scenes and many more picture sets
-Full trial
Cons: -Very few search options
-No zip files for pictures
-Some models are just not that hot
-Extremely softcore content: solo scenes, sometimes not even nude scenes
-Most videos are backstage clips, which are really not that hot
Bottom Line: I have to say that I joined this site with a trial membership of just 1$ for 2 days, as an ex-member of Twistys. And it's a good thing that I did, because if I had paid the whole 14.95$ to join it, I would probably be very dissapointed right now (and most probably, my rating for this site would have been lower too).

In general, I would say that this site has more cons than pros: although the photography and video direction are good, and the clips and pics look classy enough, they are just too softcore for my taste, being all solo sets, and not even masturbation sets: just the girls posing and teasing, sometimes without even taking all their clothes off.

Also, the navigation of the site could use some improvement, by adding some search options or classifying the sets by category (posing, teasing, stripping, backstage, for example), or offering the girls in alfabethical order, as well as in order of preference and order of appearance.

Another major con for this site, as other reviewers have pointed out already, is that they don't offer .zip files for pictures. I am not a picture fan myself, but for a site that, like this one, seems to depend so much on pictures, it's a really big mistake.

The girls featured in this site are, generally speaking, quite regular, and most of them are complete strangers to me (the only exception being Sunny Leone, who in any case is not one of my favorites). Some girls are really cute; others are not. I feel as if the site was missing at least half a dozen extra-hot models (American or European) to make up for a complete catalogue: the famous ones, the cute unknown ones and the fillers.

All in all, I am not truly satisfied with this site: although the photographer and director does a good, professional job, I don't feel like this site excels at anything in particular. Only if you are into softcore (and I mean, really soft), you may enjoy the treats that this site has to offer.

Update: I have downgraded this site from 78 to 70 due to their horrible (and I mean abysmal) customer support. I joined with a trial membership, and cancelled it (three times!!!)during the first two days; however, I was charged for the whole next month. I have emailed them four or five times, and still no response. I am wondering if this is just a coincidence, or if it's a premeditated strategy to lure you with the trial membership and then charge you the whole month no matter what... Anyway, I would recommend staying away for this site unless you really, really don't mind paying for a one month membership.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply

Visit XL Girls

56. XL Girls (0)

Darrow (8) 06-10-10  04:49am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: 1) This site features all natural, large breasted, really heavy women. There are no skinny women here, but I like women with curves and there are lots of curves here. Most, if not all of these overweight woman are very beautiful.

2)It has a really large selection of photos. There are around 1500 sets; each of them are zipped for easy downloading and there is a good mix of hardcore and softcore material.

3) The video streams since about November 2009 have been decent quality: 480p and 720p.
Cons: 1) The streaming video content since November 2009 is not uniformly high quality. About 6 or 7 are lower quality streams (including two in June 2010).

2) The quality of downloadable videos is quite bad. They are 640 x 360 for both WMV and MP4 files that are somewhat grainy. Not a bother for me as I like streaming, but this would be an issue for others.

3)The older videos are utterly crappy in terms of quality and there has been no move to replace them.

4) The price: TBP lists the price as 39.99 per month recurring and it may be 29.99. This is fairly high for what this site offers. This is a bonus site when you are a member of scoreland for more than one (or maybe two) months. I find scoreland to be worthwhile to keep as a site for extended periods of time, so I get XL girls for free.

5) Updates are a bit slow. You get two or three a week.
Bottom Line: Really good site if you like your women heavy. This is an excellent photosite for looking at pictures and downloading them. In the last year, the site has become excellent for streaming video, but it is still mediocre for donwloadable videos.

Not worth the price as a stand-alone site, however as part of the Scoreland loyalty package it is excellent.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Young Busty

57. Young Busty (0)

kyote1 (1) 06-09-10  08:52pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Nice selection of busty girls.
Good navigation. Good variety
Surprisingly great video quality!!
I got a response on a customer a support issue.
I was able to cancel easily, no hidden charges.
Cons: No zips on the pics
Sometimes the downloads were slow. Maybe a bit restrictive. They were down for a little bit but got it fixed quickly. Download manager does not play well there.
Bottom Line: I am a new member on the 3 day trial plan. Not near enough time to finish my review. I'll get a new gift card and be back soon with more results. I'm looking forward to seeing more. There are links to other company sites. I'm going to take a closer look at those
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Busty Babes Pass

58. Busty Babes Pass (0)

yadayada321 (8) 05-02-10  05:24am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 05-02-10  04:24pm  (Update History)
Reason: Forgot to consider the update schedule in my grading.
Pros: * Cute, nice-looking models.
* "Busty" models are not too skinny but not too fat either.
* Most of the sites are HD. One site though has HD vids but it's really 720x480 with a big black border added around the video just wasting space.
* Videos come in high and low quality, multi-part and complete versions.
* Picture sets are zipped.
* So far, the non-"Busty" solo, lez, and hardcore sites is where this network shines.
* A good mix of solo, toy, lesbian, and hardcore sites.
* Mostly exclusive content; some models like Abelinda are on other sites as well.
Cons: * Not enough "Busty" girl videos.
* "Busty" girl videos are boring; "Here are my tits, watch me take off my shirt and fondle my breasts for 3 to 5 minutes while I say nothing."
* Expensive relative to other "better" network "Busty" sites.
* Relatively new site, not a lot of content.
* A few sites haven't updated since last December.
* Site doesn't feel like a "network" of 40 different sites, but rather a single site with 40 models.
* "Busty" models on average only have 3 to 5 pics and video sets. "Sexy," "Teen," and other sites have around on average 10 - 20 picture and video sets.
* A lot of the non "Busty" model sites contain women with "Small" tits LOL! For example, Abelinda, Mary Private, Teen Solita, Paris Rain, Little Amy, Nikky 18, Olivia Pain, Sweet Lili, Punky Jaine, all have small tits!
* Download limits on ZIP files, but apparently, not on WMV files (I downloaded 20 GB in one day and while the ZIP files died quickly the movie clips kept on downloading away).
Bottom Line: -- 10% of score DOWNLOADS
90%: DOWNLOAD SPEED: 300-1000 KB/sec no dl manager.
90%: DOWNLOAD OPTIONS: Download manager worked, but all movie files named the same so I kind of stopped using one and just download and rename stuff manually.
75%: DOWNLOAD LIMIT: Download limit on ZIP (picture) files but apparently not for WMV files. "Your daily limit on download zips has been expired!"

-- 10% of score MISCELLANEOUS
70%: PRICE: Expensive; for $30 DDF is better and cheaper.
80%: NAVIGATION: Model database -> Model page -> Three video/picture sets per page.
90%: SUPPORT: Two questions I asked were answered in one to two days, respectively and problems were solved. Good.

-- 10% of score VIDEOS
90%: VIDEO SIZE: 1280x720 and 4,096 kbps for most videos.
80%: VIDEO QUALITY: Kind of grainy video on some (indoor) videos, but mostly great quality.
90%: VIDEO OPTIONS: Videos come in high, low, and iPod quality; multi-part and full versions available.
80%: WATERMARKS: For Busty sites, large ugly watermark on lower-right corner. On other sites size of watermarks vary from small to medium.

-- 10% of score PICTURES
90%: PICTURE SIZE: 1067x1600, 2000x1333.
90%: PICTURE QUALITY: Pictures are nice and clear.
90%: PICTURE OPTIONS: Pictures are zipped and come in small, middle, and large.
80%: WATERMARKS: For Busty sites, large ugly square black watermark on upper-right corner. On other sites size of watermarks vary from small to medium.

-- 60% of score CONTENT
75%: CONTENT SIZE: New website, so not a whole lot of content yet.
75%: CONTENT QUALITY: Busty site videos just have 3 to 5 minutes of boob play; other sites have 10 to 15 minute videos.
60%: BONUS CONTENT: Sucks; the 100 bonus sites they mention on the sign-up page are made up of 50 garbage video sites and 50 garbage game sites that are not worth anything.
80%: UPDATES: Once every couple of days; once a week. Pretty good.


Higher quality bonus content and better "Busty" videos + more "Busty Videos" and this site is easily in the middle 80's.

I really like this site, and hope it continues to get better. But as it stands right now it looks like it's just another hit-and-run, download everything you can in one month and then see you later maybe in a year or two type site.

The fact that this network is named "Busty" although it contains a lot of non-"Busty" content is a real score killer. However, since I like all types of women I found this to be quite acceptable and enjoyable (you may not though).
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Boob Exam Scam

59. Boob Exam Scam (0)

shooterbo (6) 03-08-10  11:57am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: ..Site has developed its material substantially, and now has one of the most erotic presentations in the business. The girls are genuine, and love what is taking place, despite their initial reaction to the ploy.
..Downloads available, high def is pretty much standard.
..Vid quality is pristine and camera work is customer-oriented.
..There have been a couple of episodes involving a female nurse of late, and one of them is absolutely the most erotic 3-way ffm you will ever find.
..Updates are frequent, and the parent, Pink Visual, is super consumer oriented.
Cons: More ffm will be welcome, but they appear to already be headed that way.
Bottom Line: Just an outstanding turn-on for your dollar.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Milena Velba

60. Milena Velba (1)

Karasek (8) 02-18-10  06:45am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Updated: 06-04-10  08:34am  (Update History)
Reason: Score reassessed because of missing interaction
Pros: + huge natural boobs, beautiful smile
+ lots of pics and videos, usually 2 sets and vids/month
+ large pics (1600x1100)
+ HD videos (since 05/10)
+ both WMV and Quicktime format
+ great production values, but still amateur feel
+ relatively low price ($19)
Cons: - no interaction (like webcams)
- no Zip files
- vids could be longer (usually only 5-10 min long), older HD vids are only 848x480px
- very softcore
- older content has small resolution
- site design very basic, some information outdated
- very little changes over the years, might be boring to some
- no private pics despite advertised
Bottom Line: This site is all about boobs, and its very softcore. Milena is never completely naked. She's a very charming model, and although the production values are pretty high especially the videos still have a nice "girl next door" feel. She speaks Czech and German, but no English, which isn't important since there is absolutely no interaction anyway. This is the weakest point of the site. Usually amateur models offer lots of interaction, like forums, webcams or a blog, but not this site. You don't get answers either, which is kind of frustrating for a personal site.

The site offers two sets and videos per month. The sets have ~60 pics and are sometimes pretty creative. Most of them are solo sets, but some also feature a second model and show mostly tit sucking. You will never see her private parts, but some older sets (smaller resolution) offer lactating.
The videos mostly show her pulling or shaking her boobs. All very tame, but somehow all quite charming.

$19 looks fair to me. The price hasn't changed in the last 7(!) years, which is quite amazing if you ask me. Most amateur sites charge more these days.

Bottom line: if you like huge natural breasts and quality softcore content then this site is for you. The lack of any interaction however is a big disadvantage. The site just doesn't feel personal, and without a chance to talk to the model or express your wishes you may opt for the non-recurring membership and save some money.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Dylan Ryder

61. Dylan Ryder (0)

james4096 (126) 11-21-09  02:23pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Dylan interacts quite a bit with the fans.
- Bonus access to network of 11 sites(including this one) featuring a different pornstar.
- Zip downloads of photosets
- No DRM
- Sale price of $17.95 for the site/network is a good deal
Cons: - This is a new site so there isn't much content yet.
- Content doesn't seem to be all exclusive.
- This is a new site but there are no HD vids
- There could be more updates
Bottom Line: This appears to be the official site of pornstar Dylan Ryder. This is a newish site so there isn't much content. As of this review there are 6 videos and 18 photosets. The vids are hardcore g/g, b/g and threesome. The photos are either the accompanying pics for the videos or solo sets. Some of the stuff seems to be exclusive to this site, but I recognized at least one video from somewhere else. However from what I gather Dylan will be adding more exclusive content to this site. Like I mentioned before, Dylan does interact with the subscribers. She posts on her blog every other day or so and if you comment on a photo or video she'll usually reply. Let's see if she can keep it up. Updates come usually once a week. I'd like to see more frequent updates. I know it's work for the girl but if I'm joining a single model site I expect 2 updates a week minimum.

There's a link for webcam, but I'm not into webcams much and I never caught a show. They don't have any archive shows either. You'll also find a few candid shots and other photos set up like a myspace photo album. Nothing much.

Joining give you access to the following pornstar sites:
Devon Lee
Dylan Ryder
Abbey Brooks
Hanna Hilton
Cassandra Calogera
Aaliyah Love
Ashley Fires
Monica Mayhem
Puma Swede
Hailey Young
Sweet Leah Luv

They're all similar in quality, but some of the have a lot of content like Puma Swede and others have very little like Devon Lee(brand new site). Right now this is what adds value to any otherwise tiny site.

Photos are 1000x1500 with zip downloads.
The videos come in 2 sizes of wmv (640x480 1500kps & 320x240 600kbps) and one mpg (320x240 750kbps). You can download or stream(play in browser) all 3 types. I will stress again that they need to offer HD videos soon. This is a new site and it's almost 2010. Step up your game girl.

If you're like me and you like this girl this site is promising. If it grows and they get some 720p or 1080p vids this site might be decent. But for now it's still a small site so I can't really recommend it alone right now, but joining the network is more than worth it for at least a month.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Big Tits At Work

62. Big Tits At Work (0)

oxymoron (7) 11-18-09  05:56pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of updates on the Brazzers network(4 per day). Lots of different scenarios in the various sites.
Big Tits at Work is one of the sites in Brazzers that I enjoy the most because they feature women in lingerie quite often (a personal fetish).
Attractive, busty models are featured. They are mostly full-featured girls, the corn-fed American style body seems to be prevalent.

Many different video formats are available. I tend to favor the mp4 as it is great quality and small file size. HD in 720p and 1080p are also available but 1080p only after six months continuous membership. Prior to that you can buy credits and purchase them individually.

On-site blogging by members is available and can be quite entertaining if you're bored with the porn.

2-3 years worth of content available. I've never attempted to count the number of videos on the Brazzer's site, but if they told me it was in the thousands I would say that is a fair estimate.

More anal is being featured lately.
Cons: Actresses tend to be a little on the chunky side. Skinny aficionados will have a hard time filling their needs on Brazzer's.

You have to wait to d/l the HD videos.

Some bonus content is unavailable for d/l.
Bottom Line: A good deal in terms of updates and archive content. Lots of big tits. I would recommend to big tit lovers. Brazzer's just made 780p available for free to all members, so the limitation on HD d/l now only applies to 1080p. This is still not competitive with other sites such as 21st Sextury, but the 780p looks good on an HD television.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Polish Big Boobs

63. Polish Big Boobs (0)

mbaya (356) 08-06-09  09:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through Epoch.
-No DRM, download limits, broken links, etc.
-60 models, 587 zipdownloadable photosets, 460 video clips, 5 to 10 minutes each. Recent photos are 767x1024. Nice mix of landscapes and portrait shots. Professional photography.
-Recent videos are WMV 852x480, 3172 kbps. Not HD but very nice quality.
-Updates every five days.
-Advertises itself as exclusive and appears to be true. I am familiar with Kerry Marie from the UK and have never seen these photo sets or videos on any site or DVD.
Cons: No serious negatives, basically I am just nitpicking here.
-Poor use of English on the site. Sometimes laughable, sometimes incomprehensible.
-Unnecessarily difficult navigation. Too many steps to download and then too many steps to go to the next one. Each click is to go up or down a level.
-I would love to see an option for HD videos.
Bottom Line: While the girls here are not all Polish, two are from the UK and three are Czech, they all have big NATURAL boobs. No fake ones to be found here at all. The sizes start at D, but these are only four out of the 60 on the site. Most are DD or EE and range up to H, HH and even J. These are seriousy huge. While the sheer size may be a cause of back problems for the girls, your problem may become eye strain.

The girls here are overall top quality with only two I found boring. Natural is the key word, not only in breast sizes, but also pretty much in hair color, piercing or tattoos. There is close to zero of these turnoffs to be found on the site.

The content ranges from clothed (why bother?) to teasing to pantyhose, to stripping sequences, to oudoor scenes, to public nudity. There are scenes of exercising with some very explicit posing, that compares favorably with nudesportvideos.com. There is b/g, blow jobs as well as vaginal, g/g just posing together, as well as lesbian. The photos range from artsy glamour shots to explcit to downright raunchy. A few photosets focus on the girl getting makeup before a glamour shoot, or simply clothed posing. Then there is an entire photoset devoted to the girls face and mouth after a messy blow job. The variety is sometimes surprising and nearly always interesting.

One aspect of the site that I liked is that they are whole girl, whole body focused. It would be easy to center the photos and videos just on their astonishing boobs. This site emphasizes the girls overall sexiness and that they are more than just a body to hang boobs from. Compared to XLGirls.com, this is simply superior. Those girls for the most part have big tits because their bodies are large size. Many of the scenes are them rubbing their tits and that is all you get. This site has so much more, featuring attractive girls with reasonably slim bodies, who mother nature blessed for our benefit.

With updates every five days, I am happy to give this a big thumbs up, in addition to other body parts.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Tits And Tugs

64. Tits And Tugs (0)

james4096 (126) 08-03-09  12:58pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Nice HD quality videos
- Several video options to choose from
- No DRM
- Zip Photoset downloads
Cons: - Small Library(but growing)
- Already repeating models
- A little bit pricey
- not all exclusive content
- image rez could be better
- Site design isn't great
Bottom Line: What we have here is your basic titty fucking and handjob site. You might also see a little bit of penetration. The models are all pornstars and are attractive with big breasts. The videos are mostly shot in POV. Scenes end with the man unloading on the girl's boobs. The content okay if you like big tit titty fucking.

There are only 31 scenes and the site adds a new scene every Friday. So it's going to be a while before this site is worth the money. One suggestion that I have is that they make sure to try to repeat models as little as possible. I've noticed girls already reappearing in scenes for the site, and for an niche that is so specific and repetitive that can be a bad thing. I was pleased that they had 5 or so different black girls on the site. Some sites seem to be afraid to have black too many black girls.

They do offer quite a few video options. First you have the regular 640x360 in wmv and mp4. The HD videos are 1280x720(2100kbps) wmv. There is also a "medium HD" that is 854x480 wmv. Any of the above mentioned are come in full scene or split into clips. They also have full scene downloads specifically for 3 different mobile devices, Ipod/iPhone, PSP and Windows Mobile. Lastly, you can stream it in flash in your browser.

I was not extremely impressed by the resolution of the images. The were 800x1200, and don't ask me why but you can also download them in 400x600. I don't know what they were thinking. Anyway, you can download either in a zip. At least these are actual still photos, not screen caps.

This isn't a terrible site just a small one, and in time it will grow and get better. I got this site as a bonus from Score HD. I could not imagine nor would I recommend anyone pay 29.95 for this site alone. Though I cannot suggest any at this time, there has to be some cheaper or bigger titty fucking sites out there. If you can get it from Score HD via loyalty bonus do that, but don't pay. IMHO, a site this small and specific belongs in a network, not standalone.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Young Busty

65. Young Busty (0)

james4096 (126) 07-20-09  09:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content
- Decent sized library
- Newer video quality is good
- Image rez is pretty good
- Daily Updates
- No DRM
Cons: - One billing option and site is a little pricey.
- No zips of the photosets
- Not download manager friendly.
- Site logs you out too frequently
- Older videos are poor quality and split
Bottom Line: This is a site featuring models in their early 20's who happen to be busty. The girls are European, but I'm not sure from where exactly. Don't expect to see huge tits, the models range between C and E, though they may add a cup size on to most girls to make them seem more appealing. It's a mix of hardcore B/G, lesbian and solo/masturbation. I liked the content. The are a lot of hot women in there. There are 277 videos scenes and 532 photosets. The site updates every day and the schedule seems to one photoset two days in a row then a new video, then repeat.

Joining gives you bonus access to Seventeen Live and Seventeen Cinema. I don't think that those sites are worth much. There are more like preview sites.

Downloading photos is a problem. First there are no zip files of the photosets. On top of that all the photo file names are "image," nothing descriptive or even unique. There were a lot of girls pics I wanted to download too, but I don't feel like going though the hassle. If you are mainly a photo guy, take this warning seriously, you will need much patience to get what you want. The latest images are 1333x2000 which is pretty good and even the oldest ones are 1600x1066.

The latest videos are 1280x720, 5120kbps wmv files. There is also a medium and low res option. You can download the full scene or split into 3 parts. Older videos are much lower in quality and split into clips. Streaming is available for newer videos.

It can actually be pain to download the videos. I mentioned that the site is not download manager friendly and I mean it. The comment made by badandy400 explains the problem in detail. Basically you can't even surf the site while downloading, and you're only allowed one download at a time with no resuming. So when downloading a file, resist the urge to even browse the site or you'll have to keep restarting your download.

Let me explain the problem with the billing. When you join there is one option, 3 day trial for €4.95($7 US) renewing into a 30 day monthly membership at €19.95 ($28 US). That is the only option so that means you pay about $35.00 for the first month, which is expensive. I think they need to offer the trial or the regular one month rate.

The problems this site has with actually getting the content really hurt the score. Everything badandy400 said in his comments is on point. It's a shame because I liked the content. I definitely do not recommend this site for picture collectors. I have no choice but to give this site a low recommendation until they fix the problems I outlined.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Overdeveloped Amateurs

66. Overdeveloped Amateurs (0)

jeebus (1) 06-28-09  10:47am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some of their women are unique to them and quite interesting (e.g., Doreena and Ingrid).
Cons: Site is outdated, has patently laughable web design that reeks of 'my first Microsoft Frontpage attempt', has videos split into small files (~3MB) as though most Internet users are still using 56k lines, and has very poor video quality (320x240) because the videographer is apparently too cheap or impecunious to purchase a better recording device.

Its "picture archive" is based on technology from 2001 and has a small number of pictures from 2002. Quite pathetic.
Bottom Line: The site is a borderline fraud. There is no indication prior to spending ~$20USD that there is *no* video archive.

That is, unless you check the site (and pay) every month, you will *never* have access to previous videos. For example, there is a mesmerizing amateur named Christy from 2007 who made two videos. One I have, one I wanted. Only after signing up was it apparent I would never find the other video.

As another reviewer noted, the only reasons for having no archive are to 1) bleed patrons for money each month 2) lower overall bandwidth costs 3) invest no money in allocating more hard drive storage.

It is a site run by a lazy, aesthetically-challenged, niggardly, dishonest pornographer. And that's being generous. He may have access to some interesting girls but he has no idea of how to run a website that keeps patrons returning--instead he leaves them with a decidedly foul taste of being ripped off.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Divine Breasts

67. Divine Breasts (0)

roseman (253) 04-06-09  02:57am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good collection.
- Nice monthly subscription price.
- ZIP download option for photosets offered (for new content and for a limited period of time).
- Good website design.
- Navigation is easy.
- No DRM videos protection.
- Downloading was fast for me.
- Regular updates.
- Exclusive content.
- Bonus access to 1 website (Massive Melons).
- New models are hot.
Cons: - More video download options needed.
- No trial option offered.
- Old content's quality is average.
- ZIP download option for photosets needed (not new content).
- Videos quality is average.
- Videos length is small (5+ minutes).
- Download limit (1/2 Gb per day).
- Annoying adds in members area.
Bottom Line: Divine Breasts is one of my favourite boobs adult websites but site still has room for improvements.
First of all, members gain access to a good collection with plenty of photosets and videos, plus access to another website (Massive Melons) with steaming video content.
Website design is good and you will not have a problem with navigation. Content is exclusive and daited (you will easily understand which photoset or video is new).
Videos can be downloaded only in one format (.mpg) so surely more download options are needed.
New videos can be downloaded in HD quality (which needs improvement at my opinion) as full length movies and the old ones in parts (improvement is needed in here as well). New photosets can be download in ZIP format, thing that is not available for old ones. Quality is good but has room for improvement as well.
There is no DRM videos protection but there is a download limit of 500 Mb per day, so be careful :-)
Monthly subscription price is cool but there is no trial option offered. There are a few annoying adds in members area. Site updates twice per week.
New Divine Breasts models as Ginger look very hot.
In conclusion, Divine Breasts is good adult website that every big boob lover will enjoy but surely needs improvements. Recommended.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Big Boobs POV

68. Big Boobs POV (0)

roseman (253) 04-06-09  02:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - HD videos.
- ZIP download option available for photosets.
- Multiple download formats for videos.
- No DRM video protection.
- No download limit.
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
- Exclusive content.
- Good looking models.
- Regular updates (weekly).
- Bonus videos offered (Just 3).
Cons: - Very expensive for the content offered.
- Needs growth.
- Website design could be better.
- Navigation needs improvement.
- Not enough bonus content offered.
- Download manager use not allowed.
- Downloading problems.
- Slow updates.
- Limited trial option.
Bottom Line: Big Boobs Pov is an interesting adult website that surely needs improvement.
First of all, it's collection is small at the moment about 30 scenes available for download and 3 bonus ones.
Website design is simple and surely needs improvement. Navigation is not hard but has room for improvements as well.
Photosets can be downloaded in ZIP format and quality is very good. Videos have no DRM video protection and can be downloaded in multiple formats or can be streamed online, quality is very good. There is no download limit and downloading was fast for me (most hours of day). At this point, I have to say that download managers use is not allowed and I had a few downloading problems.
Monthly subscription price is expensive for the content offered. Site updates slowly once per week with a new scene and content is exclusive. Trial option gives only limited access.
In conclusion, I believe that this sites content is interesting but it's monthly subscription price is very expensive. Your decision.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Emily Saint

69. Emily Saint (0)

roseman (253) 04-01-09  12:22am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - ZIP download option for photosets.
- No DRM videos protection.
- No download limit (at least I didn't notice it).
- Content seems exclusive.
- Some bonus galleries offered.
Cons: - Tiny collection.
- Broken links in members area.
- Emily Saint seems too tiny (is it just me?)
- No boy/girl or girl/girl scenes.
- Photosets quality needs lots of improvement.
- Videos quality is below average.
- Videos duration is about 1-2 minutes.
- Photosets collection amount is small.
- Not sure when site updates.
- Website design needs improvement.
- Navigation is not so easy.
- Downloading was slow for me (most hours of day).
- Content is not daited.
- Content seems the same.
- Content doesn't worth the price for a full month membership.
Bottom Line: All that I have to say about EmilySaint.com is a big '' l o l ''.
I joined this one as I saw one / two nice pics in free tour area but I was very dissapointed.
Members gain access to 27 photosets and 8 videos, so collection is tiny and surely doesn't worth the price of a full month membership.
Photosets quality is not very bad, their size seems small and surely lost of improvement is needed. Videos quality is the worse I have ever seem, so improvement is needed in here as well.
There is no DRM videos protection or download limit (at least I didn't notice as website's collection is tiny at the moment).
Website design is too simple and navigation is kinda confusing. Content is not daited and I am not sure if site updates and when. From the other hand, content is exclusive (at least).
There are lots of broken links in members area especially in videos section, thing that dissapointed me a lot.
There is no hardcore or girl/girl content just Emily taking of her shirt or skirt, it's the same and the same again besides she looks too tiny in my eyes (I dunno maybe it's just me). Downloading was slow for me (most hours of day).
Videos duration is about 1-2 minutes and photosets amount is small, about 25 pics each.
In conclusion, after what I have seen I wouldn't recommend this one.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Meat Melons

70. Meat Melons (0)

kman1982 (13) 03-15-09  04:03am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Around 50 High Definition videos at the current time of this review
+ High video bit rate of 4200kbits which is a lot higher than some other HD sites which can be as low as 1500kbits
+ Full image galleries supporting each scene
+ Attractive European girls with C and D cup boobs
including established busty pornstars such as Tarra White, Laura Lion and Anastasia Christ.
+ All videos have the option of streaming
+ Scenes are long - around 25-30 minutes and nicely shot
+ All videos are DRM free, no download restrictions
+ A variety of video options are available including low quality 300kbps and 700kbps if you have a slow computer but I feel that this takes the whole idea away from high defintion which is what the site is about.
+ Reasonable Subscription price
Cons: - Updates are infrequent
- Image galleries cannot be downloaded in ZIP files and when you consider there's around 300 images for each scene, it can be a real nightmare if you wanted to download the entire image set.
-Site navigation is not the clearest and can sometimes be difficult to find what you want.
- Nothing here to require a subscription for more than a month or so
- No diversity in content
- Videos are large files due to the high bit rate and 800mb - 1gb for each video might put some people off, especially if they're struggling hard drive space!
- No option for ipod and psp videos
Bottom Line: Overall I liked the idea of a High Definition site aimed exclusively at big boob lovers, I think there's defintely a place for it in the market and initially meatmelons.com looks promising with a collection of nice busty models presented in excellent quality HD video for you to see every inch of their beautiful bouncing boobs. However before you get too carried away there are several drawbacks to this site and the major problem at the moment is the serious lack of updates, whether the site has hit some problems or more content is being developed for their other sites I don't know but it's not a good thing if you want to keep customer's subscriptions.

One nice bonus feauture comes in the form of access to a series of other HD sites when you subscribe, most of them are boy/girl hardcore sites but also feauture some other niches such as milf and gangbangs so you're getting a bit more value for money here.

One nice bonus feauture comes in the form of access to a series of other HD sites when you subscribe, most of them are boy/girl hardcore sites but also feauture some other niches such as milf and gangbangs so you're getting a bit more value for money here.

It would also have been a nice idea to include a variety of different scenes. Instead of all hardcore scenes, they could add some solo or lesbian scenes and maybe some anal. Each scene is a bit repetitive with little or no difference between scenes - just the models.

The site is worth a quick look though and if you're a boob lover then you shouldn't be dissapointed added with the reasonaby priced subscription fee it makes the site worth joining but you probably won't want to stay too long.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Fantasy Girl Carmella

71. Fantasy Girl Carmella (0)

ControllingMind (Disabled) 03-10-09  12:13pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - A lot of exclusive content(but not all)
- Reputable biller (epoch)
- About a dozen sites on the network.
- Most Vids and pics decent quality(vids e.g 640x480, 720x540, 800x440. Pics 1280x853)
- Zip files for pics.
- No DRM or download limits and download manager friendly to an extent(see bottom line)
- Live regular Cam shows as part of the network, from Catalina Cruz and occasionally some of the other girls sites.
- Regular updates (but they are network updates - see cons)
Cons: - Vids can be sometimes split into 2 parts for next updates.
- Some network sites have not been updated for a while.
- Older pics and vids on the network are lesser quality.
- Indifferent pattern of network updates (bit of a lucky dip as to which site updates next or stops updating for a while)
- A little expensive.
Bottom Line: Billers are Epoch, $8.99 - 3 Day Trial, $29.99 - 1 Month, $59.99 - 3 Months. Non Recurring Options are - $75.00 - 3 Months, $99.95 - 6 Months

I have based the Pros, Cons and score on the entire network, not just Carmella's site alone. Carmella's site alone would not be worth joining as you could download all the content in about 3 hours. The poor quality older stuff is on Catalina's and the Ultimate fantasy girl sites, that go back a few years.

A lot of content seems exclusive, but some seems to be the scenes from feature movies, e.g. 'juicy juggs' which I think you would find on the likes of videobox.com and videosz.com etc. One of the other sites catalinacruz.com, is the biggest on the network and holds the major slice of overall content, which also looks to be more exclusive than the rest. TBH Carmella's and the rest of the sites, just seem smaller additions to Catalina's site.

Other sites as well as Carmella and Catalina's which are part of the network are - fantasygirlsandra.com(Sandra Romain), fantasygirlsienna.com(Sienna West), licencedtolick.com(Lesbians), licencedtoblow.com(take a wild guess), ultimatefantasygirls.com(mixed bag of scenes and pics), clubaustinkincaid.com, fantasygirlbrooke.com(Brooke Banner), fantasygirljessica.com(Jessica Jaymes), fantasygirlpuma.com(Puma Swede). Lela Starr's site was also just added about a month ago.

At first there seems to be loads of content, but some vids are split into different updates and small pic sets updated seperately, so you could download the entire network easily in a months membership. You could problably fit all the content of carmella's site on 3 DVD's, but I guess There would be around 100GB content in the total network. There is little bits of bonus stuff on the network such as Behind the scenes, candid stuff, sound files and stories. Download manager worked without any fiddling or restriction to the amount of simultanious downloads. The network however must time the downloads, as some at the back of the que bombed out a 5kb file. So not good for sticking tons of links into the download manager, letting your comp do all the work while you go out for the evening with some crack whores. The site appears to advertise 1080 full HD. I never noticed any 1080 HD vids on the site when I was there?

I can't vouch for the $8.99 3 day full trial, actually being full, as I was on monthly membership. Worth a trial? - Definately yes, if it is full. Worth a month? - Probably Yes, if you've never joined any of the network sites before. Worth more than a month - nope, do a 1 month spash and dash.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Tits Burger

72. Tits Burger (0)

stangace20 (2) 03-04-09  05:03am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Fresh Content

Hot girls

It reminds me of Big Naturals from Bangbros
Cons: New Members can only download 2 full movie files a day, though they don't restrict downloading the 1-min segments, but you need fast internet for that to not be a pain.

Their navigation is not very straight forward, you can find links to their other sites, but you have to do a lot of scrolling on the home page.

They also aren't very consistent with telling you who is in the videos. Looking around I had no idea who at least half the models were.
Bottom Line: A lot of fresh content, though if you want to download it, you'll either have to accept the 2-movie a day, rule or suck it up and download all the 1-min clips, and go from there.

Any fan of the Bangbros sites will like this one, and the other sites you get with it.

Given time and some refinement this could turn into a decent site
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Visit Mastasia

73. Mastasia (0)

xyzzy (11) 03-02-09  09:43am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - enormous, unreal, comic-book boobs!
- enormous, unreal, comic-book nipples!
- the "added-on" boobs are pretty darn impressive. I can't even tell if it's plastic, CGI, or both
- lots of lactation (albeit fake)
- models are on the whole slender and attractive
- some girl-girl action too (softcore)
- kinky costumes
- clean, well-designed, easy-to-navigate site
- billing using CCBill so easy cancellation etc
- you get what you expect from the preview page, no bait and switch tactics here
Cons: - no full nudity or hardcore, as far as I could tell
- arguably, not even any topless models! since the boobs are all faked...
- lack of real eroticism. Even the lesbian scenes are pretty tame
- not a huge amount of content
- gets a bit repetitive after a while
- the videos get "rotated" off the site. To get ones not currently listed, you have to buy them individually from a different site
Bottom Line: Okay, this is one of those sites where you get pretty much what you expect from the free tour. It has a very simple premise: pretty girls in bright, colourful sets, with bright, colourful clothes, with enormous, added-on boobies.

The content consists mainly of pictures and videos of the girls strutting their enormous udders both solo and with each other, with a healthy dose of lactation and liquids thrown in. There's a small additional area on the site with some token boob-related cartoons and animations too.

The "extra boobage" on the models is very well done and surprisingly realistic, and if you're a bit of a breast fanatic (and let's face it, if you're not, why on earth have you signed up to this site?!?) it is a genuine turn-on.

The problem is, there just isn't enough variety to really keep your interest. Download a few picture sets and videos and you'll realise they're all pretty much the same - same studio setup, same poses, etc. The lack of harder content doesn't help, and also the fact that the models always just look like they're models playing a silly game. If the site had some harder content with a little bit more "mood" I think it would be a lot better.

So, if you're a big boob fanatic, it's definitely worth signing on for a month to see slender young women with the proportions we can only dream of - but I don't think it's worth staying longer. They just need more variety, pure and simple.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Busty Britain

74. Busty Britain (0)

ace of aces (179) 02-14-09  06:22am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + great boobs
+ wmv videos, quicktime, mpeg
+ download in one part or splitted
+ videopart preview pics
+ videos files between 50 mb and 500mb
+ video duration arround 5-15minutes
+ plenty videos
+ 2 bonus sites
+ high downloadspeed
+regular updates
+ good video quality
+ no drm
+ dl manager supported
Cons: - high monthly fee 24,12 €
- navigation is not as good as it could be
- some videos are to big
- semi exclusive (but site semi exclusive)
- some fat(ugly) gilrs but the bigger the natural boobs...
Bottom Line: last but not least the third site of the membership and it`s also a must for boobs lovers.

Gigantic boobs(all kind of cup sizes) fine nice boobs, in all kind of content. You got boy girl action, mastrubation, stripping e. g..
The often nice girls are wearing stockings, socks, high heals, are naked, with any kind of pubic hair. sadly but naturally, the bigger the boobs the fatter the girls, even if there aree not a lot of volumtions girls.

There mass videos and the site is updated regular. The video files are in wmv, and the earlier in mpeg and quicktime, and are downloadable in one part. The site got small video preview scene pics which makes the decision easy if you want to downlad the file.
The downlaodspeed is good (12.580 kbit/s) and the videos have good quality and the files are with arround 50mb - 500 mb good portioned. the older the videos the smaler they are.( like on every site :) )

I am not realy sure if the content is exclusive some of the content you can also find of the other sites of that membership, what makes the deal a little bit bad. but with the two extra sites Big Tits Paradise and Only Big Melons this is a round package..

the other cons are the high monthly membership price and the navigation. It could be easier like getting a site overtaking update system, which makes it possible to see at one click the updates.

Getting that site to 90 it must have more videos, more regular updates and overworking the rest of the cons…
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Visit DDF Busty

75. DDF Busty (0)

ramscrota (12) 02-05-09  10:35pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Well organised site. All scenes have pics & vids
-Easy navigation
-No phony tits
-Big tits not just on over-weight girls; many have average build & large tits
-HQ pics. Most sets have a choice of size
-Pic sets not too large (ie not too many pics)
-Photography: they bother to snap the moment the guy comes (sister site 1 by day tends to do it better). Too many sites ignore important nuances like this. If sites bother with pics, they should do it properly, like this one
-Range of vid size selection
-Range of scene types: solo, GG & HC - toys, anal insertions, 69, anal sex, etc
-Some variety of scene type: occasional hints of dom/sub, or Melanie D & Emily Cartright, who slop glue on each others' tits!
-Tasteful, clean decor & settings. (many sites have dingy, messy settings, or ugly decor completely devoid of any erotic feel)
-PRICE: good value & payment options
-LOGIN & PW is sensible: they let you choose your own easy to remember word Also no 'enter the code' rubbish
Cons: -Although variety of vid sizes, only lower Q vids are broken into separate clips
-Although there is variety, much of the action is cliche, formula stuff. EG phoney-looking squirming around, licking through clothing/lingerie, and rubbing & jiggling of boobs before model has removed clothing. Also annoying is single-lick oral, single-lick kissing, etc.
-Often the ladies don't undress properly befer the action starts. ACtion with knickers still on (crutch pulled aside for cock, dildo, or licking. Looks like standard, drab formula, instead of rampant lust. This kind of thing is okay every now and then, but on this site it seems to be the norm.
-TOO MUCH LOOKING AT THE CAMERA Especially the photos
-Too many scenes begin with model(s) stripped down to lingerie (more evidence of formual approach)
-silly positioning for close-ups. Happens most often in doggie, but also in missionary where guy positions himself out of line so we can see entry. An annoying tendency in porn, this.
Bottom Line: Summary
A good-value, high-quality site, easy to navigate, easy to find good models, and user friendly. The site focuses on models with large boobs, but it's not a fetish site - you get the full menu (pussy, sex, cum-shots, oral, etc). But they make good use of the large tits - eg boucing them around, self-licking, etc. The doggy sex scenes are particularly good, because these give scope for the ladies' udders to swing around like sets of wrecking balls. Usually the cum shots are over the tits, something which I find a bit limited. I prefer them to be in the mouth or face, preferably with the girl jacking the guy off.
Nevertheless, it's one of the better sites around, value-wise. The only thing that prevents it from being a top-rating site are several of
those irritating formula aspects which seem to come not from a sense of natural erotica, but the girls doing what they're told (see above in the 'cons'). If the site organizers freed themselves of much of this nonsense, this really would be a top-rating site.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 51-75 of 258 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Easy Site Search
Advanced Search

Most Reviews
1. Porn Megaload (1)
2. Christy Marks (1)
3. XX Cel (1)
4. Nadine Jansen (1)
5. Cassandra Calogera (1)
6. Sara Jay (1)
7. Nicole Peters (1)
8. Milena Velba (1)
9. Catalina Cruz (1)
10. Busty Brits (1)

View All : Most Reviews

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.29 seconds.