Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Top Heavy Amateurs

Top Heavy Amateurs (1)

Active
50
BubbaGump (18) 06-01-12  01:01pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: None
Cons: -- Photo quality is abysmal.
-- Photosets are largely screen captures of grainy videos and are saved with high JPEG compression.
-- Video quality is even worse.
-- Site frequently freezes.
-- Advertusing bares no resemblence to actual site content.
Bottom Line: Anyone who has read my reviews in the past knows I am pretty fair and impartial. In an effort to maintain this reputation, I will limit my comments to the facts.

I am hard-pressed to say anything positive regarding my experience at this site.

The site design and layout is extremely primitive. When I was able to access the content, I was exceedingly dissapointed with the content and quality of images and videos.

The vast majority of images are small resolution photos that are saved with extremely high JPEG compression. The Pixelation is severe in the majority of images. Sets that are displayed as HD image quality consists of one or two images saved with 1400x800 resolution, with the remainder at 700x400 or below. I did not come across an image that did not contain compression artifiacts. More than half the images are blurry enough to be useless and appear to be nothing more than screen captures of videos.

The video quality is, in many cases, worse than the photo image quality and at times appears to be video captured with an older cell phone.

Connecting to the site is problematic. I frequently locked up and often could not access video content.

The advertising images are high-quality, but this kind of content is nowherre to be found in any of the actual content in the members area.

In short, I could not in good faith reccomend this site to anyone interested in this genre, whether it be photos or videos. I would even go so far as to supply an entirely subjective opinion, which is that sites like this give online porn a bad name.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

gaypornolover (38) Excellent review, it's good to read reviews warning people off poor quality sites and as TBP has yet to review it, yours is particularly helpful.
06-02-12  07:56am

Reply To Message

2

BubbaGump (18) REPLY TO #1 - gaypornolover :

Thanks. I usually try to supply whatever info I can to try to help people get an honest opinion. In this case, there was only so much to supply and it is all negative. I honestly can't think of a positive.

I really feel bad for anyone who actually signed up on the 3 or 6 month plan. I just signed up for the 30 day and always do this as I will cancel it right away if I find it is not for me or not what was advertised. In this case, I got burned for $23. Certainly not the end of the world and it is much better than getting taken for $60 for the 3-month plan.

IMO, there should be something like a warning list that sites like this put together to let people know that people are reporting questionable practices or content. Sites certainly can't ban a site just because one person like me says so and I wouldn't expect them too.

I couldn't write anyone and demand money back because their is nobody to write. No customer service or contact info. I am partly to blamew. I should have paid more attention that this info was missing and with any business, I always like to know someone will field an inquiry.

It is technically difficult to call thease guys crooks as they did not falsely rerpresent what you will see at the site--busty amateurs. However, the total lack of qualtiy of the material and the problems with access is such that it is hard to not believe you were taken and that there is someone accepting the payment from CCBill and thinking, "Enjoy, sucker."

I could let CCBill know but obviously the sensitive nature of this and the stigma makes that unpalitable. What do you say? "The nude photos of boobs are mostly small images that are out of focus and grainy shit" ?

IMO, these kinds of vendors do a disservice to the legit vendors out there and gives the business a bad name. It also causes consumers to lose trust. It just reinforces the stereotype that some people hold that porn is run by crooked and unethical cretens looking for a quick dollar. I do not aggree with that opinion for the entire industry but regarding this vendor, it's hard not to make that judgement.

06-02-12  01:03pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.