Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (367)  

Feedback:   All (2808)  |   Reviews (173)  |   Comments (32)  |   Replies (2603)

Other:   Replies Received (1253)  |   Trust Ratings (68)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 51-75 of 1253 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)
REPLY TO #5 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

Agreed. I currently have memberships to Hardcore Gang Bang (which now includes Bound Gangbangs ) and Public Disgrace. Some of the scenes are incredible.

01-02-14  01:35pm

Reply
52
Visit Device Bondage

Device Bondage
(1)
REPLY TO #3 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

Agreed. One of the reasons I avoid tube sites and gladly pay for porn is to assist the sites in staying in business and making more of it for me to buy and enjoy. In this case, they offer a premium product and are likely justified in charging a premium price.

01-02-14  01:32pm

Reply
53
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)
Reply of pat362's Comment from rearadmiral:

And I meant to add... your title to this comment was worth a great laugh. I hope you intended it that way!

01-01-14  07:42am

Reply
54
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)
REPLY TO #2 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

I agree. When I first became a Kink customer they really seemed to be different. Back then I wouldn't have been surprised if they reported the glitch and extended memberships by two weeks to compensate people.

01-01-14  07:41am

Reply
55
Visit Device Bondage

Device Bondage
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

I think I'm going to retract my surprise at the price increase here. Based on the information from the webmaster back in '07 and your information this sounds much more reasonable. Besides, I've paid $65 for a membership to Infernal Restraints and still found that to be a fair value.

01-01-14  07:39am

Reply
56
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)
Reply of pat362's Comment from rearadmiral:

pat:

Coincidentally I stumbled on your comment when I came here to post the same thing. I'm not a member now, and haven't been for about a year, but I noticed that the December 30th update was "The Star Player" starring Amy Brooke and Isis Love. This was immediately apparent to me because this is my favorite EB scene, and among my favorite Amy Brooke scenes. (Boo to new boobs!!!) But I have it already and therefore I know it's a repost.

Back a year or so ago I also noticed that they removed the upload dates from all the scenes at Water Bondage so it isn't immediately apparent that this site hasn't updated in a long time.

I always felt that Kink seemed to be much more ethical than this. When I joined my first Kink site maybe four or more years ago I screwed up my account and I was very impressed with how quick and helpful they were.

I hope all of these signs don't point to trouble at the best BDSM sites on the internet.


12-31-13  04:24pm

Reply
57
Visit Back Room Casting Couch

Back Room Casting Couch
(1)
REPLY TO #7 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

That's a good price. I doubt I'll take the leap though since it was only a few days ago that my membership expired.

As for the models, some of them could easy become A-list models without much effort.


12-31-13  11:23am

Reply
58
Visit Naughty Webcams

Naughty Webcams
(0)
REPLY TO #19 from NoHagsHere: (pat362's Reply)

I get that, but I think definitions of "real relationship" are changing as of late.

12-31-13  09:46am

Reply
59
Visit Back Room Casting Couch

Back Room Casting Couch
(1)
REPLY TO #3 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

I agree that I'd like to see many of these girls join the business and make more porn. Both this site and Exploited College Girls have some really attractive unknowns.

I find both Back Room Casting Couch and Exploited College Girls to be among the best in this niche. Broke Amateurs could have been a contender but instead of improving file resolution they've actually reduced it.


12-30-13  01:53pm

Reply
60
Visit Back Room Casting Couch

Back Room Casting Couch
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

I found the shooting style has improved. The static cameras get repositioned depending on the action and where it's happening in the room, so that helps too. I find that his POV abilities are very good.

The male performer still uses the circle to obscure his face. I don't find that to be a deal breaker because he mostly manages to keep his face out of the shots anyway.

What's the cost of the special offer?


12-30-13  01:39pm

Reply
61
Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club
(3)
REPLY TO #3 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

I saw those and that prompted me to ask the question. I think I'll err on the side of caution and not join. I'd be willing to take a risk if the price were lower, but not with it as high as it is.

12-30-13  10:26am

Reply
62
Visit Hardcore Video Network

Hardcore Video Network
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from jberryl69: (pat362's Reply)

Thanks Pat though I had no intention of joining. And honestly I can't even tell you what motivated me to even go look, though I'm sure it's something from the thread Jook started. At any rate, as soon as I hit the page, alarms started to go off so I just thought I'd mention it on the PBP site page. Appreciate your support.

12-26-13  01:05pm

Reply
63
Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club
(3)
REPLY TO #6 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

Thanks pat. I haven't joined yet and will take your advice and look at Try Teens instead.

12-26-13  11:06am

Reply
64
Visit Hardcore Video Network

Hardcore Video Network
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from jberryl69: (pat362's Reply)

Besides the pop-up it feels like a tube site just from the way it looks upon looking at the front page. And a cheap tube to boot. I didn't really stick around to find out.

12-26-13  05:53am

Reply
65
Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club
(3)
REPLY TO #3 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

Thanks pat. This is helpful information. I think I'll follow TheSquirrel's advice and join a single site (with free ones added) rather than the whole network. Since this is my first time joining the lack of updates won't be an issue, though that will also mean that I likely won't rejoin. I'll probably join in January since I've got three Kink.com memberships on the go as of yesterday with more planned. I haven't been to a Kink site in almost two years and I can't explain why since their material is among the best on the internet for that niche.

12-26-13  05:48am

Reply
66
Visit Naughty Webcams

Naughty Webcams
(0)
REPLY TO #17 from NoHagsHere: (pat362's Reply)

But what relationship IS real?

12-15-13  08:53pm

Reply
67
Visit Naughty Webcams

Naughty Webcams
(0)
REPLY TO #15 from NoHagsHere: (pat362's Reply)

Dude, I know, but you should see the followings some of these ladies have. It's amazing and some of them don't even do anything. Almost literally. I think it really becomes about a psychological attachment of sorts with guys who frequent cam girls online. I'm pretty attached to one particular cam girl myself but she's the only one I give a shit about. Some guys have multiple girls they visit regularly, and some are
gaga over one. It's weird, I know, but it's not really about sex, or titillation.


12-12-13  09:41pm

Reply
68
Visit 18X Girls

18X Girls
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from messmer: (pat362's Reply)

I wish I had known that before I subscribed, Pat. I naively believed that I would find all of the models on the tour page in the site. Haven't found one yet. Anyway, after a couple of downloads yesterday, with one video looking like the other, with only the faces changing, I once again wish I could give away a subscription because I have no desire to go back.

12-10-13  11:32am

Reply
69
Visit Naughty Webcams

Naughty Webcams
(0)
REPLY TO #13 from NoHagsHere: (pat362's Reply)

If you're getting your money's worth of $13/minute, I'd think that's fine. I think the most I ever paid was maybe $5 or $6/minute. That must be one hell of a show for 13 bucks a minute.

12-10-13  09:09am

Reply
70
Visit Naughty Webcams

Naughty Webcams
(0)
REPLY TO #9 from NoHagsHere: (pat362's Reply)

It doesn't always for for me. I have to be in the mood, although lately, I get more of an emotional connection than anything else (yeah, I have to pay chicks to chat with me online). And you'd be lucky to find any decent cam chicks at $2/minute.

12-08-13  10:02pm

Reply
71
Visit Naughty Webcams

Naughty Webcams
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from NoHagsHere: (pat362's Reply)

1) I actually don't know how the rates compare.
2) Yes, there are porn performers on there as well as the same cam girls from other cam sites. It seems most if not all the cam girls use multiple platforms simultaneously.
3) There is a lot of variety, yes, but it seems most are Russian and Colombian.
4) Many cam girls milk the time and try to engage you in chat. I have spent literally hours just chatting with no nudity whatsoever making the scene. The better ones get right to it and don't waste your time asking you what you want to see. One thing I know - it's illegal in the Ukraine for cam girls to be naked, so you might want to avoid any from there (UA) unless you're ok with mostly chatting.
5) Most girls just sort of dance around or basically spread their legs and ass, alternating between positions. Some get right into dildo play. And some just chat at length.


12-05-13  07:54pm

Reply
72
Visit 50Plus MILFs

50Plus MILFs
(1)
REPLY TO #9 from messmer: (pat362's Reply)

Well, I can sympathize in a way, Pat. I know your interest in classic Porn and it would be awfully hard to come up with HD, in this case. I have kept some vintage movies myself and don't mind the picture because that's all that's available. But if given a choice in Porn and TV between analog and digital I go HD every time. My wife can't see what the fuss is all about but I've waited for HD TV half of my life and now that I have it there's no way I am going back to the old format.

12-05-13  02:53pm

Reply
73
Visit 50Plus MILFs

50Plus MILFs
(1)
REPLY TO #4 from messmer: (pat362's Reply)

I understand, Pat. For some reason I only want to watch the latest and the best. I even feel that I compromise if I download 720p instead of 1080p. :-) So far I have 82 of this site's scenes in 720p which is a pretty good indication that they had HD from the very beginning. But I am the same when it comes to watching TV. I don't go to the non-HD channels any more. But different strokes ... and all that. :-) Gee, it's good to be back!!!

12-04-13  11:31am

Reply
74
Visit 50Plus MILFs

50Plus MILFs
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from messmer: (pat362's Reply)

Hi Pat, every single scene I downloaded was 720p if I remember correctly. Some of the earliest material might have been non-HD but if that was the case I wouldn't have bothered.

12-03-13  09:25pm

Reply
75
N/A REPLY TO #2 from turboshaft: (pat362's Reply)

You can easily get bad lighting outside on a sunny day because natural lighting is a single, super strong source--the sun, which no artificial light can truly replicate, and certainly not on a shoestring porn budget. The problem is that this can create really harsh shadows depending on the season and time of day. So performers are squinting, unevenly lit, and the setting becomes less than picturesque.

Shooting inside near a window as you mentioned brings up other problems. The light sources are different color temperatures and the picture will be white balanced for the indoor source (or on auto balance, which will adjust to the inside), probably a warmer tungsten or incandescent light. The light coming from the window will look blue and kind of weird, but not exactly out of place for a porn video.


12-03-13  09:11am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 51-75 of 1253 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.34 seconds.