| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
The Classic Porn
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Cybertoad:
I have 2gigs of old material, sadly quality did not transfer well to new technology sites. I was kinda surprised at the high price. There would only be server and sale cost as production and porn staff would not exist. My opinion great site concept slight high price for old poor quality porn.
|
03-07-13 06:12am
|
Reply
52
|
Janet Exposed
(1)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Cybertoad:
Site like these often exist when the owners have no idea of their target market audience. And is a sign of poor management in my opinion. A site should never charge or charge a high price to get a discount. The result will be huge revenue loss far exceeding what membership brings. My opinion charge 4.99 a month and allow discount. Members will stay members longer and in turn buy more stuff. That's been my side job for over 15 year straightening out misguided businesses.
he looks smokin but I won't join a site with these limits.
|
03-07-13 06:00am
|
Reply
53
|
The Classic Porn
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from lk2fireone:
Stag films, when I was growing up, just mean a porn film. Mainly a low-budget production with nudity that was far more revealing than what a commercial movie would show. A sex movie.
The video quality of those days was poor to horrible, compared to whatg is available today on the internet.
So when you say "stag films", what do you mean? I assume you mean low-quality porn films. Correct?
I've bought DVDs of movies that were not stag films, but early erotica fromt the 1970s. And the DVD quality is poor. I am talking about a copy of Emanuelle, and The Story of O. I saw those two movies at a movie theater when they came out. And the quality was vastly superior to the DVD quality of those copies that you can buy at Amazon.
I assume that they didn't bother to keep prisine copies of those movies, even though the movies were both moneymakers, I assume.
That was a real shame.
So finding pristine copies of older movies from the 1970s or 1980s would be a hit or miss situation. They just didn't have the foresight to keep good copies of these types of movies.
|
03-05-13 11:32am
|
Reply
54
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I see your point now. Thanks for clarifying that. I haven't noticed that yet and probably won't until I rejoin for the second or third time. Good point though...
|
03-01-13 04:31am
|
Reply
55
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
This is an amazing site! I agree that it is entirely possible that the scenes will seem repetitive after I watch a lot more. I have to add that this happens with other sites too so it really isn't a fault of this network. My cure for that is to watch other stuff for a while and then come back to the stuff that I was starting to find repetitive.
I should make it clear though, that this is no reason to not join the site. (And I know that isn't what you were trying to say but I want others who might misinterpret what we're saying.)
|
02-26-13 03:01pm
|
Reply
56
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Dracula:
(pat362's Reply)
No problem. It's nice to see another site at least offering Roku. I'll keep an eye out for more content. I do that searching too. It's like finding a diamond in the rough when you find something. The search is a lifelong venture!
|
02-24-13 12:48pm
|
Reply
57
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Dracula:
(pat362's Reply)
I signed up last night with Hot Movies. The list of vampire films was impressive. Then I ran into two problems. The first was most of the vampire titles that came up on my internet search were not available through Roku. Then of those titles that I could see only via my PC, I had to buy the scene to watch it. The site didn't offer streaming of the titles. I also noticed some titles used the same pictures too.
I was so hopeful too! But still, thank you for letting me know about this site. I'll check back. Hopefully they will stream more titles as time goes.
|
02-24-13 10:38am
|
Reply
58
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Dracula:
(pat362's Reply)
Thank you for this information. I will have to take a look at this site.
|
02-23-13 07:39pm
|
Reply
59
|
Lela Star
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RLane:
(pat362's Reply)
Thank you for your reply and information and I'll take that into consideration when I'm looking into solo models.
|
02-23-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
60
|
Natasha Belle
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RLane:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the heads up about it and I'll try to ask around.
|
02-23-13 04:44pm
|
Reply
61
|
Teens Analyzed
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from joekramer08:
(pat362's Reply)
I've been wanting to join this network for a while and I probably will in the next month or so. I like the look of their scenes. The lighting is kind of amateurish, but I like how they shoot their scenes zoomed out to show off the girl's body. I can get over an amateurish look if the scene does a good job of showing me the girl.
|
02-18-13 04:55pm
|
Reply
62
|
Teens Analyzed
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from lk2fireone:
I just joined this network today, because, like you, I have been interested in a few sites in the network, and this seemed like a cheap way to get access. Since I just joined today, I have to get used to navigation at these sites. I click on a thumbnail, and instead of loading a video I want to see, I am re-directed to a site that I can sign up for. You weren't kidding when you wrote that: -Each page on the site is loaded with third party advertising.
I signed up through the Young Sex Parties site, but it's all part of the same network, I assume.
I think your description of the network/site is very accurate, from what I've seen so far. I've only watched 2 videos, but they both have a very amateur feel to them.
But I do believe there are more professionally shots videos at this network, because I've seen some of them in the past.
Do any of these sites have a simple model listing with nice-sized thumbnails to show what the models look like?
|
02-16-13 04:07pm
|
Reply
63
|
Teen Mega World
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
I posted a comment a few weeks back that Wow Orgasms, their newest site, has good videos that I think are new to the network. I can't swear to that, because the network has so many sites, and I certainly haven't seen all their videos. But I think the videos at Wow Porn all are new. That's currently 30 videos at the site. The update rate is irregular, sometimes one video a day, other times they might skip a few days with no updates, and then add a video.
But the videos at Wow Orgasm are worth watching.
|
02-16-13 12:45pm
|
Reply
64
|
Teens Analyzed
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from elephant:
Nice review Pat
Yeah some sites you think, looks kinda good, you save it and when you do eventually join often never quite what you had hoped it would be or really low res and no updates, loads of sites like still taking peoples money but never update.
|
02-12-13 01:14am
|
Reply
65
|
Wow Girls
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from dieselman:
(pat362's Reply)
Hello Pat! I am sure you wont get bored on WowGirls. I agree with elephant, we have lot's of scenes which worth the membership fees alone!
Now, regarding your question:
At this moment, we have the following scenes:
Hardcore films without anal - 77 films (36 girls)
Hardcore films with anal - 16 films (12 girls)
Girl-Girl films - 51 films (49 girls)
Solo films with anal - 3 films  (3 girls)
Girl-Girl films with anal - 2 films (4 girls)
Lots of more scheduled ahead of course.
Thank you for your comment!
|
02-10-13 12:35pm
|
Reply
66
|
Tushy Lickers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ILiekIke:
(pat362's Reply)
I call BS on you, Pat, because I too had the same experience that the original poster did, and in no way shape or form does this website send you to CCBill to create your membership (I even just tried it again now since it's been a while). The only mention of any billing at all is a generic reference to "Netbilling" at the bottom banner.
to the original poster, they seem like fraudsters. I've had to get all charges reversed by my CC company as they've ignored my emails, and Ocelot's "24/7 number" is really just a voicemail dump which they don't reply to.
|
02-07-13 11:37pm
|
Reply
67
|
Oldje
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(pat362's Reply)
You are just reinforcing what I am saying.
Price is important.
Everything has to be marketable.
ie, Worth it's price.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-03-13 02:43pm
|
Reply
68
|
Oldje
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the added background.
Price is always a factor. It has to be.
Otherwise we would all be driving around in top of the range cars.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-03-13 02:14am
|
Reply
69
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
I've always figured that it's the studio that makes the demands for premium pricing and not the site. Which is why you'll see some studios use it for most of their movies, but others never use it at all.
|
02-03-13 12:43am
|
Reply
70
|
Oldje
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Capn:
The subscription is a hefty price.
85 is a high rating.
Do you honestly think it is worth it?
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-02-13 05:34pm
|
Reply
71
|
Elegant Angel
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I hope that is the case. I try to avoid having to use VOD sites for obvious reasons but in some cases I just can't wait to see a particular scene. They seem to have put the "Lexi" title up pretty quick so I'm hoping for the same with BWA 22. My fingers are crossed!
|
01-29-13 01:36pm
|
Reply
72
|
Elegant Angel
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks pat. I'll keep an eye on the EA site. I most certainly did see her first! I just watched the scene from BWA 22 and it is definitely a good one. I rented the VOD at Adult DVD Empire.
|
01-27-13 11:05am
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
You hit the nail right on the head, Pat.
|
01-21-13 10:10pm
|
Reply
74
|
Jules Jordan
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from manast:
Thanks for a great review Pat. I have been thinking of joining for a long time but have been put off by the high price for this site and the fact that he's split his work into two sites. However, I do like his work but I know there are other gonzo/anal sites that are far, far cheaper and have just as good a content. I'll probably join for a month and then move on.
|
01-20-13 01:19pm
|
Reply
75
|
Jules Jordan
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the info, pat. I will probably put off joining here until it is a bit cheaper or I come into some extra cash.
|
01-18-13 08:58pm
|
