| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Teen Mega World
(4)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from Stas RC:
Hi, thanks for your opinion.
We keep working on our main page in order to add new previews immediately after they are added in our members area.
We wave daily updates in our members area.
|
04-01-13 03:31am
|
Reply
27
|
Little Caprice
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
yeah, I was planning on joining it years ago, but somehow never got around to it, guess I should have back then, at least it would have been a better deal.
|
03-30-13 10:18am
|
Reply
28
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Marcus:
(pat362's Reply)
It's not MUCH worse, but for me yes, it is worse. If it's a trial, call it a trial - but I think to pass it off as some 'age verification' fee is pretty dishonest. I agree with your sentiment about trials, though.
|
03-29-13 11:34am
|
Reply
29
|
House Of Taboo
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from RustyJ:
This site is the main reason I rejoin DDF time and time again. It's really quite unique although as you said, many different niches mean that half of the scenes are a miss. I also wish they released scenes as whole and not as parts as it is just artificially inflating the total scenes number.
|
03-29-13 04:51am
|
Reply
30
|
House Of Taboo
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
Oh, cool. I always get worried when I see "euro models". Thanks for replying!
|
03-29-13 04:28am
|
Reply
31
|
House Of Taboo
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from marcdc1:
Thanks Pat for mentioning their are some British Models. I myself don't go for porn I can't understand so English speakers is important to me. Glad to know some of that is available here.
|
03-28-13 07:20am
|
Reply
32
|
Hands on Hardcore
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from RustyJ:
When you say, they use remastered content, do you mean recycled lower resolution videos from the past or are they actually scaling it up to larger files now?
|
03-25-13 10:24pm
|
Reply
33
|
Teen Mega World
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Dracula:
(pat362's Reply)
No she didn't. Just that MP4 downloads were available. Comparing file sizes, the MP4 looks a little larger than the FLV type the downloads default to.
|
03-24-13 05:39pm
|
Reply
34
|
Teen Mega World
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Dracula:
(pat362's Reply)
I did notice that. Some movies don't look very good. I thought they were older, but it could be the resolution, which in a way is the same thing. Thanks!
|
03-24-13 05:19pm
|
Reply
35
|
Teen Mega World
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Dracula:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks Pat362. TeenMegaWorld tech support emailed me the same answer about a few minutes ago. They offer MP4 downloads for portable devices, so I'm good. Thanks for your feedback!
|
03-24-13 05:06pm
|
Reply
36
|
First Anal Quest
(3)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from benmar51:
Thanks Pat, for another terrific review. . . Just 1 question. . .I was just looking at the sample (1:00) videos on their site and I noticed that they all had slo-mo segments in them. I was just wondering if this is something they did for their trailers, or are there slo-mo segments in the actual scenes (which I can`t stand). Thanx.
|
03-20-13 08:26pm
|
Reply
37
|
Whoring Out My Wife
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
Your words of wisdom were too late for me.
I'm going to do full reviews of the sites in the network so others will see what they're getting. I don't know how much I can bitch for the low price. But it's certainly not a competing website.
Like you said it looks like they abandoned it years and years ago and are now trying to milk the last drops from the videos/pix that they have the right to.
|
03-17-13 08:29am
|
Reply
38
|
VideosZ
(5)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
I completely agree with your assessment, Pat! That's why no more DVD sites for me once my long term subscription to VB expires.
|
03-11-13 02:07pm
|
Reply
39
|
Ann Angel XXX
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Marcus:
(pat362's Reply)
Yep, definitely, hence my '...if it wasn't for the terrible download restrictions on there' comment. Will not be letting my membership recur, but will keep an eye on the preview area of her XXX site to see if it looks like there's any improvements in time.
|
03-10-13 08:35am
|
Reply
40
|
Ann Angel XXX
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Marcus:
(pat362's Reply)
Yes, I'd definitely agree with that assessment.
I think for nearly 5 months' of content, the radio of hardcore is pretty disappointing, but beyond that the quality of hardcore is pretty bad too.
I would definitely recommend her other site over this one if it wasn't for the terrible download restrictions on there. There's more content, it's easier to navigate and it was one of the best in its niche excepting the fact you can't download anything.
|
03-10-13 07:05am
|
Reply
41
|
Ann Angel XXX
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Marcus:
(pat362's Reply)
It's definitely disappointing, but I wouldn't call it a scam.
Photo-wise it's pretty bad really. Only 4 galleries are 'hardcore' with the hardcore aspect in each gallery only making up for about 10% of the content, and like I say, the pictures are all kinda the posed HC pics (dick in mouth, after the cumshot etc)
Video-wise the recent street walker one is definitely hardcore by any definition with them having sex in bed. It does feature quite a bit of action including a moneyshot, but that's the only video like that.
The outdoor fuck video is OK, but it just kinda ends, no conclusion or moneyshot and same with a lingerie BJ video which was shot outside - the description said they were interrupted and to look out for part 2 'soon' but it was posted in November and no sign of it yet...
I'm sure it'll get better, but if anybody's joining for the hardcore aspect I think they'll be disappointed.
|
03-10-13 12:28am
|
Reply
42
|
Girls Do Porn
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
My guess is the guys that run the site are just lazy, video editing and site design are very amateur, it seems like they just film it and throw it up there. It is a pity, as they have many attractive ladies there, they just don't present the material well.
|
03-09-13 11:42am
|
Reply
43
|
Janet Exposed
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Nor me. But even if I were interested in the female model the business model is enough to keep me away.
|
03-09-13 04:47am
|
Reply
44
|
Janet Exposed
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the review Pat. I've had janet on my radar for a while, having seen some of her other work in other places.
Glad I've put off buying long enough to see it's not worth the membership.
|
03-08-13 08:49am
|
Reply
45
|
Janet Exposed
(1)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from rearadmiral:
Interesting review, pat. I'm definitely not in her target market, not being interested in MILFs. But even if I was, the need to download in segments would keep me away. I really don't understand how a webmaster could get a site so wrong.
|
03-07-13 01:33pm
|
Reply
46
|
Janet Exposed
(1)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Denner:
Funny, special, interesting to read this review - been a fan of Janet Mason for years - a cute, american milf - no a bit more than that - and that her own site is still alive - it was the site that turned me on a long time ago.
Later and now she's got zillions of material out there - and most of it great - got about 50 or more vids with Janet - love her.
And thanks to pat362 for bringing the site up again - even if it's gone down the drain.
|
03-07-13 07:26am
|
Reply
47
|
The Classic Porn
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Cybertoad:
I have 2gigs of old material, sadly quality did not transfer well to new technology sites. I was kinda surprised at the high price. There would only be server and sale cost as production and porn staff would not exist. My opinion great site concept slight high price for old poor quality porn.
|
03-07-13 06:12am
|
Reply
48
|
Janet Exposed
(1)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Cybertoad:
Site like these often exist when the owners have no idea of their target market audience. And is a sign of poor management in my opinion. A site should never charge or charge a high price to get a discount. The result will be huge revenue loss far exceeding what membership brings. My opinion charge 4.99 a month and allow discount. Members will stay members longer and in turn buy more stuff. That's been my side job for over 15 year straightening out misguided businesses.
he looks smokin but I won't join a site with these limits.
|
03-07-13 06:00am
|
Reply
49
|
The Classic Porn
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from lk2fireone:
Stag films, when I was growing up, just mean a porn film. Mainly a low-budget production with nudity that was far more revealing than what a commercial movie would show. A sex movie.
The video quality of those days was poor to horrible, compared to whatg is available today on the internet.
So when you say "stag films", what do you mean? I assume you mean low-quality porn films. Correct?
I've bought DVDs of movies that were not stag films, but early erotica fromt the 1970s. And the DVD quality is poor. I am talking about a copy of Emanuelle, and The Story of O. I saw those two movies at a movie theater when they came out. And the quality was vastly superior to the DVD quality of those copies that you can buy at Amazon.
I assume that they didn't bother to keep prisine copies of those movies, even though the movies were both moneymakers, I assume.
That was a real shame.
So finding pristine copies of older movies from the 1970s or 1980s would be a hit or miss situation. They just didn't have the foresight to keep good copies of these types of movies.
|
03-05-13 11:32am
|
Reply
50
|
21Sextury.com
(9)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I see your point now. Thanks for clarifying that. I haven't noticed that yet and probably won't until I rejoin for the second or third time. Good point though...
|
03-01-13 04:31am
|
