Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (373)  

Feedback:   All (3007)  |   Reviews (176)  |   Comments (36)  |   Replies (2795)

Other:   Replies Received (1333)  |   Trust Ratings (67)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 1333 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A REPLY TO #6 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

I know a guy who specializes in pre-1995 and vintage, VHS, mags, reels, whatever, so hit me up if you are interested.

02-08-15  06:59pm

Reply
2
N/A REPLY TO #4 from Jay G: (pat362's Reply)

Totally agree about being picky.... I already have more porn that I will probably ever view..... now am looking for new & different, interesting and creative.....always looking for that special item that makes the heart race with excitement like it did when I first saw porn so many years ago.

Kind of like mining for gold.... have to look through a lot of mud, clay, and rock to find those glittering objects.


02-08-15  05:04pm

Reply
3
N/A REPLY TO #15 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

Sad but true about the drop off in new content. There were years when there were over a hundred new sites featuring peeing, now last year I don't think I could name ten new ones, and many more closed than opened.

01-27-15  08:20pm

Reply
4
N/A REPLY TO #13 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

The taboo nature is part of the fun too. If it weren't for people opposed to it, and you are entitled to your own opinion, then it wouldn't have quite the same thrill.

01-26-15  07:01pm

Reply
5
N/A REPLY TO #11 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

If only people could keep a more open mind. Anything that can be enjoyed between consenting adults should be able to be portrayed.

01-25-15  06:06pm

Reply
6
N/A REPLY TO #9 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

Dude, I wouldn't touch that stuff with a 10 foot pole, and if I could delete it all with a keystroke right now I would.

Off the top of my head, here's some of the legal stuff that's been censored:

PornstarPunishment.com

This has been beat to death on other forums. Posts supposedly from a Brazzers.com employee have implicated it to VISA, of course, you can take that with a grain of salt. This same poster, who is supposedly charged with reviewing Brazzers content, wrote about some the other criteria for removal which include models in pigtails, because it is too suggestive of underage, and models drinking alcohol on the set.

SickPuppy.com

They constantly posted about all the pressure from credit card processors, now almost all of their content is removed.

WatersportsSluts.com (Hard Glam Network)

Owner wrote in an article on XBiz.com how he was forced to close when his payment processor cut him off. This actually wasn't because the content was too extreme, but he was a UK operator, and he failed to comply with ATVOD. Rather that allow him to work it out, his payment processor just terminated his account, and rather than try to find another processor, he just closed up shop.

Along this note, sites forced to close or remove content by ATVOD could be added to the list, and there are many of those.

YellowDiscipline.com

It is relatively common knowledge that F2M peeing may be permissible in small quantities on US sites, but M2F peeing is off limits. This is one of many US sites that specialized in M2F peeing that have closed over the years. Do I like M2F peeing - not at all - but it still proves my point. Some people do enjoy it though, and these sites shouldn't have had to close.


There's another huge group of sites totaling in the 100's that have categorically been censored by the credit card processors. Sites that featured #2, which I am not into, but also had tons of other content that was legit. I won't list them all, because these sites pushed the limits too much for mention here. I will just mention one.

Veronica-Moser.com

This is the best example, because if you go to her new page on Hightide (ask me if you want the link, but be warned), she explains in detail how credit card processors forced her to take down her site. She did lots of straight up peeing shoots that were legit, but they went down with the ship. We have talked about her peeing content, although not about this idea, but she is an example of someone who might be open to this distribution model.


01-25-15  11:43am

Reply
7
N/A REPLY TO #5 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

Bringing back the older stuff owned by people that left the industry is a long shot as you say, because those people are checked out and unreachable.

My other idea was licensing stuff that was censored by the payment processors though, and that may be an interesting discussion, so I am moving it to the forum.


01-24-15  07:37am

Reply
8
N/A REPLY TO #3 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

I think that you, me, and lots of people feel this way. There are so many posts on all the porn forums looking for this or that video that someone saw 10 years ago that they can't for the life of them find anymore. For lots of porn fans, it seems that these old videos are actually the most sought out content.

It gets me thinking, if only there were a way to purchase the older stuff together with the rights and necessary documents for distribution, or license it, and bring more of it back. Or, for the older stuff that went down due to payment processor restrictions, to find alternative methods of monetizing its distribution. There could be huge potential here, if anyone could figure this one out.


01-23-15  08:49pm

Reply
9
N/A REPLY TO #4 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)

Ditto. No interest at all.

12-17-14  09:21pm

Reply
10
N/A REPLY TO #6 from host2626: (pat362's Reply)

"All the time. Thank God I have it because I would stop watching porn right now if I had to watch the bulk of what gets made these days."
^ THIS! :)


11-04-14  11:36pm

Reply
11
N/A REPLY TO #3 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)

A brief BJ is OK, but a BJ that exceeds about a minute causes a fast forward. Cunnilingus, not a choice in this poll, is always worth a watch, especially if the labia lips are hanging down and available for nibbling.

Another fast forward situation is too much focus on a guys dick and/or hairy ass during the basic fuck makes me wonder about the sexual orientation of the cameraman.

I came to see the babe(s), not the dude(s).


10-31-14  05:22pm

Reply
12
N/A REPLY TO #5 from Jay G: (pat362's Reply)

Soft-core for me always covers everything that is sexy but not explicit. The clips I've downloaded from 21st sextury and several other sites, for example, have several minutes of girls walking sexily, slowly disrobing, etc, before the male walks in.

When the male arrives there are often a few minutes of foreplay that I would also consider softcore until there is an actual hard dick or explicit sexual act. Kissing and fondling before explicit acts I would also consider "soft-core" but may be seen by others as borderline hard-core when the mouth gets near the genitals.

An interesting discussion, at any rate.


10-25-14  05:43am

Reply
13
N/A REPLY TO #5 from Cybertoad: (pat362's Reply)

No LOL

10-04-14  04:59pm

Reply
14
N/A REPLY TO #2 from Cybertoad: (pat362's Reply)

Women after 40 tend to be more horny then those in there 20's not sure about that as men tend to lose interest in there later years and fish and hunt but will not pass up a BJ. LOL

10-03-14  04:16pm

Reply
15
N/A REPLY TO #1 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)

Ditto.

The only exception is when I have a problem of some kind and contact the support function. Don't know whether the response comes from the webmaster or a support person...if there is a response.


09-27-14  11:07am

Reply
16
N/A REPLY TO #6 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)

Ditto.

Much more stuff for much less $$$. The old video rentals were great at 3 tapes/ 3 days / $7 but with an average of 5 scenes per video that meant about 50 cents per scene. VideoBox offers 150+/- scenes per month at about 10 cents a scene.

Best part is storage. Tapes took up a tom of space and trying to locate a favorite scene required a precise indexing system.


09-01-14  12:56pm

Reply
17
N/A REPLY TO #3 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)

I'm with Pat. My answer is I review both TBP and PU before considering a site as suitable. If the write-ups are good, then I'll check out the site and take the dive if appropriate.

Incidentally, I do the same when I'm returning to a previously subscribed to site.


08-04-14  03:20pm

Reply
18
N/A REPLY TO #4 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

It's dishonest when that happens, but I think it's great when sites remaster their older stuff, bring it up to modern quality, and clearly label it as remastered.

07-21-14  08:16pm

Reply
19
N/A REPLY TO #5 from turboshaft: (pat362's Reply)

Don't forget razor burn, pat362! ;-)

In fact pubic shaving in general can show all kinds of flaws when presented in HD: the redness, bumps, and those annoying missed spots. I'll gladly volunteer myself for select--highly select--shaving of female performers if pussy and ass depilation is too delicate a task to be done alone. And even if you deplore the bush-free look do you honestly also want a fully forested ass?


05-01-14  05:44pm

Reply
20
N/A REPLY TO #11 from turboshaft: (pat362's Reply)

Sucks that Seymore had to waste his time and money on that case, especially considering that there was plenty of this and even harder content on American sites by then, but apparently DVDs are sacred media.

I seem to remember reading that most of the jury who had to watch the offending scene at trial--you know, "evidence"--were more bored than offended, plus it's something you have to seek out to really get all worked up about. Of course that's how so many of the concerned moralists of the world work; leaving no stone unturned until at least one fragile person finds something offensive.


04-21-14  03:12pm

Reply
21
N/A REPLY TO #6 from turboshaft: (pat362's Reply)

Yeah, I remember a few fleeting moments of android-assisted pleasure followed by unstoppable Yul Brynner murderousness--we've been warned!

Of course such things never seemed to have stopped anybody once they get an erection, though count me out as I'm still having nightmares from this fucking insane Japanese robot mouth of terror.


04-14-14  06:58pm

Reply
22
N/A REPLY TO #5 from turboshaft: (pat362's Reply)

I was watching something recently that was shot only a few months ago with Amber Rayne, and I guess I'd kinda forgotten she's been in the business for nine years now. And amazingly in that time--a veritable eternity in porn careers--she's bucked the trend of so many veteran performers and hasn't destroyed her body, gotten married, or softened her performances one bit! :-)

04-10-14  08:52pm

Reply
23
N/A REPLY TO #4 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)

Ditto pat362.

02-01-14  11:19am

Reply
24
N/A REPLY TO #2 from turboshaft: (pat362's Reply)

You can easily get bad lighting outside on a sunny day because natural lighting is a single, super strong source--the sun, which no artificial light can truly replicate, and certainly not on a shoestring porn budget. The problem is that this can create really harsh shadows depending on the season and time of day. So performers are squinting, unevenly lit, and the setting becomes less than picturesque.

Shooting inside near a window as you mentioned brings up other problems. The light sources are different color temperatures and the picture will be white balanced for the indoor source (or on auto balance, which will adjust to the inside), probably a warmer tungsten or incandescent light. The light coming from the window will look blue and kind of weird, but not exactly out of place for a porn video.


12-03-13  09:11am

Reply
25
N/A REPLY TO #10 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

Agreed. But I still can't imagine a world without facials!

10-31-13  11:04am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 1333 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 3.73 seconds.