Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (371)  

Feedback:   All (2951)  |   Reviews (175)  |   Comments (36)  |   Replies (2740)

Other:   Replies Received (1311)  |   Trust Ratings (67)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 1311 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
N/A REPLY TO #5 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

Bringing back the older stuff owned by people that left the industry is a long shot as you say, because those people are checked out and unreachable.

My other idea was licensing stuff that was censored by the payment processors though, and that may be an interesting discussion, so I am moving it to the forum.

01-24-15  07:37am

N/A REPLY TO #3 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

I think that you, me, and lots of people feel this way. There are so many posts on all the porn forums looking for this or that video that someone saw 10 years ago that they can't for the life of them find anymore. For lots of porn fans, it seems that these old videos are actually the most sought out content.

It gets me thinking, if only there were a way to purchase the older stuff together with the rights and necessary documents for distribution, or license it, and bring more of it back. Or, for the older stuff that went down due to payment processor restrictions, to find alternative methods of monetizing its distribution. There could be huge potential here, if anyone could figure this one out.

01-23-15  08:49pm

N/A REPLY TO #4 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)

Ditto. No interest at all.

12-17-14  09:21pm

N/A REPLY TO #6 from host2626: (pat362's Reply)

"All the time. Thank God I have it because I would stop watching porn right now if I had to watch the bulk of what gets made these days."
^ THIS! :)

11-04-14  11:36pm

N/A REPLY TO #3 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)

A brief BJ is OK, but a BJ that exceeds about a minute causes a fast forward. Cunnilingus, not a choice in this poll, is always worth a watch, especially if the labia lips are hanging down and available for nibbling.

Another fast forward situation is too much focus on a guys dick and/or hairy ass during the basic fuck makes me wonder about the sexual orientation of the cameraman.

I came to see the babe(s), not the dude(s).

10-31-14  05:22pm

N/A REPLY TO #5 from Jay G: (pat362's Reply)

Soft-core for me always covers everything that is sexy but not explicit. The clips I've downloaded from 21st sextury and several other sites, for example, have several minutes of girls walking sexily, slowly disrobing, etc, before the male walks in.

When the male arrives there are often a few minutes of foreplay that I would also consider softcore until there is an actual hard dick or explicit sexual act. Kissing and fondling before explicit acts I would also consider "soft-core" but may be seen by others as borderline hard-core when the mouth gets near the genitals.

An interesting discussion, at any rate.

10-25-14  05:43am

N/A REPLY TO #5 from Cybertoad: (pat362's Reply)


10-04-14  04:59pm

N/A REPLY TO #2 from Cybertoad: (pat362's Reply)

Women after 40 tend to be more horny then those in there 20's not sure about that as men tend to lose interest in there later years and fish and hunt but will not pass up a BJ. LOL

10-03-14  04:16pm

N/A REPLY TO #1 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)


The only exception is when I have a problem of some kind and contact the support function. Don't know whether the response comes from the webmaster or a support person...if there is a response.

09-27-14  11:07am

N/A REPLY TO #6 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)


Much more stuff for much less $$$. The old video rentals were great at 3 tapes/ 3 days / $7 but with an average of 5 scenes per video that meant about 50 cents per scene. VideoBox offers 150+/- scenes per month at about 10 cents a scene.

Best part is storage. Tapes took up a tom of space and trying to locate a favorite scene required a precise indexing system.

09-01-14  12:56pm

N/A REPLY TO #3 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)

I'm with Pat. My answer is I review both TBP and PU before considering a site as suitable. If the write-ups are good, then I'll check out the site and take the dive if appropriate.

Incidentally, I do the same when I'm returning to a previously subscribed to site.

08-04-14  03:20pm

N/A REPLY TO #4 from LPee23: (pat362's Reply)

It's dishonest when that happens, but I think it's great when sites remaster their older stuff, bring it up to modern quality, and clearly label it as remastered.

07-21-14  08:16pm

N/A REPLY TO #5 from turboshaft: (pat362's Reply)

Don't forget razor burn, pat362! ;-)

In fact pubic shaving in general can show all kinds of flaws when presented in HD: the redness, bumps, and those annoying missed spots. I'll gladly volunteer myself for select--highly select--shaving of female performers if pussy and ass depilation is too delicate a task to be done alone. And even if you deplore the bush-free look do you honestly also want a fully forested ass?

05-01-14  05:44pm

N/A REPLY TO #11 from turboshaft: (pat362's Reply)

Sucks that Seymore had to waste his time and money on that case, especially considering that there was plenty of this and even harder content on American sites by then, but apparently DVDs are sacred media.

I seem to remember reading that most of the jury who had to watch the offending scene at trial--you know, "evidence"--were more bored than offended, plus it's something you have to seek out to really get all worked up about. Of course that's how so many of the concerned moralists of the world work; leaving no stone unturned until at least one fragile person finds something offensive.

04-21-14  03:12pm

N/A REPLY TO #6 from turboshaft: (pat362's Reply)

Yeah, I remember a few fleeting moments of android-assisted pleasure followed by unstoppable Yul Brynner murderousness--we've been warned!

Of course such things never seemed to have stopped anybody once they get an erection, though count me out as I'm still having nightmares from this fucking insane Japanese robot mouth of terror.

04-14-14  06:58pm

N/A REPLY TO #5 from turboshaft: (pat362's Reply)

I was watching something recently that was shot only a few months ago with Amber Rayne, and I guess I'd kinda forgotten she's been in the business for nine years now. And amazingly in that time--a veritable eternity in porn careers--she's bucked the trend of so many veteran performers and hasn't destroyed her body, gotten married, or softened her performances one bit! :-)

04-10-14  08:52pm

N/A REPLY TO #4 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)

Ditto pat362.

02-01-14  11:19am

N/A REPLY TO #2 from turboshaft: (pat362's Reply)

You can easily get bad lighting outside on a sunny day because natural lighting is a single, super strong source--the sun, which no artificial light can truly replicate, and certainly not on a shoestring porn budget. The problem is that this can create really harsh shadows depending on the season and time of day. So performers are squinting, unevenly lit, and the setting becomes less than picturesque.

Shooting inside near a window as you mentioned brings up other problems. The light sources are different color temperatures and the picture will be white balanced for the indoor source (or on auto balance, which will adjust to the inside), probably a warmer tungsten or incandescent light. The light coming from the window will look blue and kind of weird, but not exactly out of place for a porn video.

12-03-13  09:11am

N/A REPLY TO #10 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

Agreed. But I still can't imagine a world without facials!

10-31-13  11:04am

N/A REPLY TO #7 from graymane: (pat362's Reply)

Speaking of cum play ....... Your answer is right on the money.
BTW ..........
Do'ya suppose the aforementioned phrase "right on the money" has anything to do with how "the money shot" got its name?

Anyway, your poll answer reminded me of a clip I have of an older man that , like the usual pussy-starved loser who, striking out more times with women than the whole Yankee roster does in a major league season against opposing pitchers, seized on the idea to effortlessly have his pussy-cup never more to run dry.
All it took was an ad for aspiring models who wanted to get into films, apply for additions at his home, hereafter called Hollywood gateway studio.
Later, with apps and pictures stacked almost to the ceiling, his next step was hiring a competent cameraman, and at the same time tap his hefty monetary resources for State-of-the-art equipment to embellish his new Sodom and Gomorra acquiescence.

The clip I was referring to was one of his sessions wherein this woman taught the old man some new tricks, the more memorable of which she'd collect his semen in a cocktail glass and gulp it down. ....

you've been around the block a few times collecting your keen knowledge and observance into the mecca of porn ........got any thing to add or top concerning the weird behavior of porn-related cum antics?
About all I know is the nutritional value of a cocktail glass of the stuff.

10-29-13  12:11am

N/A REPLY TO #6 from rearadmiral: (pat362's Reply)

That surprises me about you. You and I have a lot of the same interests so I just assumed that you were into facials and cum play too. I learned something new...

10-28-13  04:48pm

N/A REPLY TO #2 from jberryl69: (pat362's Reply)

Wow Pat, If I'd read the question correctly I would have picked no also, but alas, I failed, both with my pick and my comment. Shamed.

I changed my vote but my comment cannot be fixed.

Perhaps "known" could be considered the connection between eyes and hand.

09-27-13  05:49am

N/A REPLY TO #4 from graymane: (pat362's Reply)

Thanks, Pat, for providing the link. It gives one of the more comprehensive reports that I've come across.
Of course these reports can be found all over the place.
Among others you have Google, youtube, or any browser will point you to a slew of choices to get information on porn actor's and actress deaths.

09-24-13  04:29pm

N/A REPLY TO #4 from Monahan: (pat362's Reply)

I voted Face because that's more significant by a narrow margin over the other choices.

08-27-13  08:18pm

N/A REPLY TO #7 from turboshaft: (pat362's Reply)

Pat, it's more than just a cultural thing, it's the law, or at least how the law is most widely interpreted, as they worry that showing the genitals, or even pubic hair, is legally considered obscene. It does seem crazy in 2013 and in a modern, socially liberal country at that, but the U.S. has plenty of equally crazy morals-and-decency type laws on the books at the local and state levels that most likely wouldn't pass the smell test with the 1st Amendment if seriously challenged in court.

The odd thing is the genitals are a legal no-no but the ass apparently isn't...so there are some weird looking anal videos out there where the lady's vagina is either pixelated or covered with what look likes a giant Band-Aid (which I think is way more disturbing, but it's probably a fetish at this point) and her backdoor is uncensored in all it's glory.

08-23-13  03:25pm

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 1311 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 3.08 seconds.